ML15244A318: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15-4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form ES~301-4 II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15- 4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I :, | ||
1 / 2 I:, Operating Test No.: 2015301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# 1. The initial conditions are realistic | Operating Test No.: 2015301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# | ||
, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. rJ/A C41/ 3. Each event description consists of | : 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~~ tJ/~ ~ | ||
: 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ rJ/A C41/ | |||
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew | 3. | ||
.*Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event | |||
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario | ~v-tJ' rJ/;I | ||
, and allows the examination team to obtain | .** the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) w., | ||
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. "r "'J,o.. C-PJ | |||
: 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~t' rJ/A c.p., | |||
Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., 9. The scenarios have been validated | ~ | ||
. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), | : 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. rJ /,A aJ; | ||
any open simulator | ~ | ||
, as verified using Form ES-301-6 | : 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | ||
Vt>-] 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events "'/I\ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). | Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. | ||
Cues are given. | |||
------1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b,5,5 ' | rJ/p. ~ | ||
: 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., | |||
I | |||
: 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated Yt tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ~ | |||
I | |||
: 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | |||
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 . "t f'I If. ~ | |||
11 . All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). | |||
~9"" rJ/A Vt>-] | |||
: 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events | |||
~9Y "'/I\ | |||
13. | |||
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). | |||
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. t'9" r'/A "' | |||
(#", | |||
I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- -- | |||
: 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f9- "'/,A WJ I | |||
: 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) ;l.. I I I \ 'Y9-- r' '4 Ctr/ | |||
: 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 I5 I .;}. I~ r'fA ~ | |||
: 4. Major transients (1 - 2) I I I I I w tJ/A L. | |||
: 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 - 2) i I I I ;).. Yo--- rl IA ,J. | |||
: 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr t'~ J_ ' | |||
: 7. Critical tasks (2- 3) ~ / ;l / ). ).'t"'~ ,.t ~ C!tW"t I}} |
Latest revision as of 08:08, 31 October 2019
ML15244A318 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Duane Arnold |
Issue date: | 08/20/2015 |
From: | NRC/RGN-III |
To: | NextEra Energy Duane Arnold |
Zoia, C D | |
Shared Package | |
ML15118A364 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML15244A318 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form ES~301-4 II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15- 4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I :,
Operating Test No.: 2015301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~~ tJ/~ ~
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ rJ/A C41/
3.
.*Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
~v-tJ' rJ/;I
.** the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) w.,
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. "r "'J,o.. C-PJ
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~t' rJ/A c.p.,
~
- 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. rJ /,A aJ;
~
- 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
rJ/p. ~
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c.,
I
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated Yt tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ~
I
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 . "t f'I If. ~
11 . All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
~9"" rJ/A Vt>-]
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events
~9Y "'/I\
13.
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. t'9" r'/A "'
(#",
I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f9- "'/,A WJ I
- 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) ;l.. I I I \ 'Y9-- r' '4 Ctr/
- 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 I5 I .;}. I~ r'fA ~
- 4. Major transients (1 - 2) I I I I I w tJ/A L.
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr t'~ J_ '
- 7. Critical tasks (2- 3) ~ / ;l / ). ).'t"'~ ,.t ~ C!tW"t I