ML22144A075
| ML22144A075 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold |
| Issue date: | 02/22/2019 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | NextEra Energy Duane Arnold |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17214A865 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22144A075 (1) | |
Text
- ~
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: April 8, 2019 Scenario Numbers: 1/ 2 /3 Operating Test No.19-1:
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c'
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,.@ i\\t_v/\\
but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
e..tl:7
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
~, '
JlJ-<-\\ on
- 3.
Each event description consists of the following:
the point In the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event cjJ the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
~
c.s-,
the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
(~ b.v\\ (;,z:)
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete I
evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
~( ~w C-,11"1_
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
~! ~
ce; Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
& ~
~
\\
/
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance
- 8.
deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional
~
~v.~
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
~
~w Ol>"l I
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the
~( ~
I~
form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 9r ~
c~
rating factora. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
21!..
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified YI!/' ~\\ CIJ?
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when 6i-- (p..V'\\ i~
possible.
- 14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
~I ~'-"1 Vi(
Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
- 2 I? I ?.
~
,.b,,A dP'(
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I '21 4,
~
~ 0.-w\\ t~
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 5 I --Z, I 4
~
~
lbr
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
?..,-z, z.
~.~
I~
- 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario 2 / 2 / i
'fP, ~
I~
set)
- 6.
Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2)
~ I ;1 *-1 9" Qtt.w ~
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column *c*; chief examiner concurrence is required.