ML15244A318: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15-4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I:, Operating Test No.: 20 15301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# 1. The initial conditions a re realistic , in that some equipment and/or ins tru menta ti on may be out of se rvi ce, but it does not c ue the operators into expec ted events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. rJ/A C41/ 3. E ach event description consists of . the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301                                     Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist                                   form       ES~301-4 II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center                           Date of Exam: 4/6/15- 4/17/15           Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I :,
* the malfunction(s) that are ent ered to initiate the event tJ' rJ/;I
Operating Test No.: 2015301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES                                                         Initials a   b*       c#
* the s ymptom s/cues that will be visible to the c rew w., . the expected opera tor actions (by s hift pos iti on)
: 1.       The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.                                   ~~ tJ/~              ~
* the e vent termination point (i f applicable)
: 2.       The scenarios consist mostly of related events.                                                           ~          rJ/A C41/
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario " r "'J,o.. without a cre dible preceding incident such as a seismic event. C-PJ 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. rJ/A c.p., 6. Sequencing and t iming of events is reasonable , and allows the examination team to obtain rJ /,A aJ; comp let e eva lu ation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 7. If time compression techniques are used , the scenario summary cl ea rly so indicates. Op erators have suffic i ent time t o carry out expected activit i es without undue time cons trai nts. rJ/p. Cues are given. 8. The simu l ator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator Y t I perform ance deficien c ies or deviation s from the referenced plant h a ve been evaluated tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained whil e runnin g the pl anned s cenario s. " t I 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new o r sig n ificantly mod ifi ed scenario. f'I If. All other scenarios have been alte r ed in accordance with Sect i on D.5 of ES-301. 11. All individ ual operator competencies can be evaluated , as verified using Form ES-301-6 rJ/A (submit the form along w i th the s imul ator scenarios).
3.
Vt>-] 12. Each appl i cant will be s i gnificantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eve nt s "'/I\ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the si mul ator scenarios).  
          .*Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
"' 13. The lev e l of diffi c ul ty is appropriate to sup port licensing decisio n s for each c r e w position. t'9" r'/A (#", I Targe t Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes  
                                                                                                                      ~v-tJ'   rJ/;I
------1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f 9-"'/,A WJ ;l.. I I \ 'Y9--r' '4 I 2. Malfunctions after EOP en try (1-2) I Ctr/ 3. Abnormal e vent s (2-4) 3 I 5 I .;}. r'fA 4. Major tran s ients (1-2) I I I I I w tJ/A L. 5. EOPs e ntered/requir i ng substantive actions (1-2) i I I I ;).. Y o---rl IA , J. 6. E OP co ntingencies requiring substantive ac ti ons (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr J_ ,.t ' 7. Cr iti ca l tasks (2-3) C!tW"t I}}
          .**     the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) w.,
: 4.         No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.                                        "r          "'J,o.. C-PJ
: 5.       The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.                                           ~t' rJ/A c.p.,
                                                                                                                    ~
: 6.       Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.                                               rJ /,A  aJ;
                                                                                                                    ~
: 7.       If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
rJ/p.     ~
: 8.       The simulator modeling is not altered.                                                                     Jr!)/ "'/,o. c.,
I
: 9.       The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated                     Yt tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.                                       ~
I
: 10.         Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 .                       "t          f'I If.  ~
11 .       All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
                                                                                                                    ~9""      rJ/A    Vt>-]
: 12.         Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events
                                                                                                                    ~9Y "'/I\
13.
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.             t'9"       r'/A     "'
(#",
I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)                     Actual Attributes           --     --     --
: 1.       Total malfunctions (5-8)                                                                 b ,5,5           'f9-       "'/,A WJ I
: 2.      Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)                                                    ;l.. I I \     'Y9--       r' '4   Ctr/
: 3.       Abnormal events (2-4)                                                                 3 I5      I .;}. I~          r'fA     ~
: 4.       Major transients (1 - 2)                                                                 I I I I I     w         tJ/A L.
: 5.       EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 - 2)                                     i   I I I ;).. Yo--- rl IA ,J.
: 6.       EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)                                   I I I I I     'Fr t'~ J_             '
: 7.       Critical tasks (2- 3)                                                                 ~ / ;l / ).          ).'t"'~    ,.t ~  C!tW"t I}}

Latest revision as of 08:08, 31 October 2019

2015 Duane Arnold Energy Center Initial License Examination Form 301-4
ML15244A318
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/2015
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
Zoia, C D
Shared Package
ML15118A364 List:
References
Download: ML15244A318 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form ES~301-4 II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15- 4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I :,

Operating Test No.: 2015301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~~ tJ/~ ~
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ rJ/A C41/

3.

.*Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event

~v-tJ' rJ/;I

.** the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) w.,

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. "r "'J,o.. C-PJ
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~t' rJ/A c.p.,

~

6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. rJ /,A aJ;

~

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

rJ/p. ~

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c.,

I

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated Yt tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ~

I

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 . "t f'I If. ~

11 . All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

~9"" rJ/A Vt>-]

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events

~9Y "'/I\

13.

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. t'9" r'/A "'

(#",

I Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f9- "'/,A WJ I
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) ;l.. I I I \ 'Y9-- r' '4 Ctr/
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 I5 I .;}. I~ r'fA ~
4. Major transients (1 - 2) I I I I I w tJ/A L.
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 - 2) i I I I ;).. Yo--- rl IA ,J.
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr t'~ J_ '
7. Critical tasks (2- 3) ~ / ;l / ). ).'t"'~ ,.t ~ C!tW"t I