ML16333A231: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Lyon, Fred Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:34 AM To: MATZKE, ERICK P
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                                 Lyon, Fred Sent:                                 Monday, November 28, 2016 8:34 AM To:                                   MATZKE, ERICK P


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)By letter dated November 14, 2016, OPPD submitted a request to rescind Interim Compensatory Measure (ICM) B.1.a for Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No. 1 related to EA-02-026, "Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures." The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)
By letter dated November 14, 2016, OPPD submitted a request to rescind Interim Compensatory Measure (ICM) B.1.a for Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No. 1 related to EA-02-026, "Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures." The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
1


Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         3181 Mail Envelope Properties  (c438274acf11418e8e1be7ac10128c18)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
 
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. 
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3181   Mail Envelope Properties  (c438274acf11418e8e1be7ac10128c18)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843) Sent Date:   11/28/2016 8:34:16 AM Received Date: 11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM From:   Lyon, Fred Created By:   Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:     "MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)
Tracking Status: None  
Sent Date:           11/28/2016 8:34:16 AM Received Date:       11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM From:                 Lyon, Fred Created By:           Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>
Post Office:   HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   3140     11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM
Tracking Status: None Post Office:         HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files                         Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                       3140                 11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
 
Recipients Received:}}
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 12:36, 30 October 2019

Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)Fort Calhoun, Unit 1, Request for Rescission of Interim Compensatory Measure B.1.a from EA-02-026, Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures.
ML16333A231
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 11/28/2016
From: Lyon F
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Matzke E
Omaha Public Power District
References
EA-02-026, MF8843
Download: ML16333A231 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Lyon, Fred Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:34 AM To: MATZKE, ERICK P

Subject:

Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)

By letter dated November 14, 2016, OPPD submitted a request to rescind Interim Compensatory Measure (ICM) B.1.a for Fort Calhoun Station (FCS), Unit No. 1 related to EA-02-026, "Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures." The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is November 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3181 Mail Envelope Properties (c438274acf11418e8e1be7ac10128c18)

Subject:

Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8843)

Sent Date: 11/28/2016 8:34:16 AM Received Date: 11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM From: Lyon, Fred Created By: Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:

"MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS03.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3140 11/28/2016 8:34:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16333A231&oldid=2015011"