IR 05000027/2017201: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/17/2017
| issue date = 08/17/2017
| title = Washington State University - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Routine Inspection Report 05000027/2017201
| title = Washington State University - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Routine Inspection Report 05000027/2017201
| author name = Mendiola A J
| author name = Mendiola A
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DPR/PROB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DPR/PROB
| addressee name = Keane C
| addressee name = Keane C
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000027
| docket = 05000027
| license number = R-076
| license number = R-076
| contact person = Morlang G M
| contact person = Morlang G
| document report number = IR 2017201
| document report number = IR 2017201
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:ust 17, 2017
[[Issue date::August 17, 2017]]


Dr. Christopher Keane
==SUBJECT:==
 
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-027/2017-201
Vice President for Research
 
Washington State University
 
Pullman, WA 99164-6525
 
SUBJECT: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-027/2017-201


==Dear Dr. Keane:==
==Dear Dr. Keane:==
From July 17 - 20, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted an  
From July 17 - 20, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted an inspection at your Washington State University TRIGA research reactor located in the Nuclear Science Center. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on July 20, 2017, with Dr. Donald Wall, Director of the Nuclear Science Center, and members of your staff.
 
inspection at your Washington State University TRIGA research reactor located in the Nuclear  
 
Science Center. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed  
 
on July 20, 2017, with Dr. Donald Wall, Director of the Nuclear Science Center, and members of  
 
your staff.
 
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your
 
license. The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and
 
interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of noncompliance
 
were identified. No response to this letter is required.


In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations , Section 2.390, "Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of noncompliance were identified. No response to this letter is required.


response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public  
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Mr. Gary Morlang at 301-415-4092 or electronic mail at Gary.Morlang@nrc.gov.
 
Document Room or from the NRC's document system (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this in spection, please contact Mr. Gary Morlang at 301-415-4092 or electronic mail at Gary.Morlang@nrc.gov.


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/
Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief  
Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-27 License No. R-76 Enclosure:
 
As stated cc: w/enclosure: See next page
Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch  
 
Division of Policy and Rulemaking  
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Docket No. 50-27  
 
License No. R-76  
 
Enclosure:  
 
As stated  
 
cc: w/enclosure: See next page  
 
ML17215B522; concurrence via e-mail NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB NAME GMorlang NParker AMendiola DATE 8/14/17 8/14/17 8/17/17
 
Washington State University Docket No. 50-027
 
cc:
 
Director Division of Radiation Protection
 
Department of Health
 
7171 Cleanwater Lane, Bldg #5
 
P.O. Box 47827
 
Olympia, WA 98504-7827
 
Mr. David Clark, Director
 
Washington State University
 
Radiation Safety Office
 
P.O. Box 641302
 
Pullman, WA 99164 1302
 
Dr. Ken Nash Chair
 
Washington State University
 
Reactor Safeguards Committee
 
Nuclear Radiation Center
 
P.O. Box 641300
 
Pullman, WA 99164 1300
 
Mr. Corey Hines, Reactor Supervisor
 
Washington State University
 
Nuclear Radiation Center
 
P.O. Box 641300
 
Pullman, WA 99164 1300
 
Test, Research and Training
 
Reactor Newsletter
 
P.O. Box 118300
 
University of Florida
 
Gainesville, FL 32611-8300
 
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
Docket No. 50-027
 
License No. R-076
 
Report No. 50-027/2017-201
 
Licensee: Washington State University
 
Facility: Nuclear Science Center
 
Location: Pullman, WA
 
Dates: July 17 - 20, 2017


Inspector: Gary Morlang
ML17215B522; concurrence via e-mail NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB NAME GMorlang NParker AMendiola DATE 8/14/17 8/14/17 8/17/17


Approved by: Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch
Washington State University Docket No. 50-027 cc:
Director Division of Radiation Protection Department of Health 7171 Cleanwater Lane, Bldg #5 P.O. Box 47827 Olympia, WA 98504-7827 Mr. David Clark, Director Washington State University Radiation Safety Office P.O. Box 641302 Pullman, WA 99164 1302 Dr. Ken Nash Chair Washington State University Reactor Safeguards Committee Nuclear Radiation Center P.O. Box 641300 Pullman, WA 99164 1300 Mr. Corey Hines, Reactor Supervisor Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center P.O. Box 641300 Pullman, WA 99164 1300 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8300


Division of Policy and Rulemaking  
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Docket No. 50-027 License No. R-076 Report No. 50-027/2017-201 Licensee: Washington State University Facility: Nuclear Science Center Location: Pullman, WA Dates: July 17 - 20, 2017 Inspector: Gary Morlang Approved by: Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Washington State University Nuclear Science Center NRC Report No. 50-027/2017-201  
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Washington State University Nuclear Science Center NRC Report No. 50-027/2017-201 The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the on-site review of selected aspects of the Washington State University (the licensees) Class II research and test reactor safety program including: (1) operations logs and records, (2) surveillance and limiting conditions for operation, (3) experiments, (4) committees, audits and reviews (5) emergency preparedness, (6) maintenance logs and records, and (7) fuel handling since the last U.S.


The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the on-site review of selected
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection of these areas. The licensee's program was acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety and in compliance with NRC requirements.


aspects of the Washington State University (the licensee's) Class II research and test reactor
Operations Logs and Records Operational activities were consistent with applicable technical specifications (TSs) and procedural requirements.
 
safety program including: (1) operations logs and records, (2) surveillance and limiting
 
conditions for operation, (3) experiments, (4) committees, audits and reviews (5) emergency
 
preparedness, (6) maintenance logs and records, and (7) fuel handling since the last U.S.
 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection of these areas. The licensee's program was
 
acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety and in compliance with
 
NRC requirements.
 
Operations Logs and Records  
 
Operational activities were consistent wi th applicable technical specifications (TSs) and procedural requirements.


Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations The program for tracking and completing surveillance checks and limiting conditions for operation satisfied TS requirements.
Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations The program for tracking and completing surveillance checks and limiting conditions for operation satisfied TS requirements.


Experiments  
Experiments Conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements specified in the TSs, the applicable experiment irradiation authorizations, and associated procedures.
 
Conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements specified in the TSs, the applicable experiment irradiation authorizations, and associated procedures.
 
Committees, Audits and Reviews


The review and audit program was being conducted by the Reactor Safeguards Committee.
Committees, Audits and Reviews The review and audit program was being conducted by the Reactor Safeguards Committee.


The composition and meeting frequency satisfied requirements specified in the TSs.
The composition and meeting frequency satisfied requirements specified in the TSs.


Emergency Preparedness  
Emergency Preparedness The Emergency Plan (E-Plan) and Implementing Procedures were being reviewed and updated as required.
 
The Emergency Plan (E-Plan) and Implementing Procedures were being reviewed and updated as required.


Emergency response facilities and equipment were being maintained as required and responders were knowledgeable of proper actions to be taken in case of an emergency.
Emergency response facilities and equipment were being maintained as required and responders were knowledgeable of proper actions to be taken in case of an emergency.
Line 198: Line 62:
Off-site support was acceptable and communications capabilities were adequate.
Off-site support was acceptable and communications capabilities were adequate.


Annual drills were being conducted and critiques were being held as required by the E-Plan. Maintenance Logs and Records Maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements.
Annual drills were being conducted and critiques were being held as required by the E-Plan.


Fuel Handling
-2-Maintenance Logs and Records Maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements.


Fuel handling activities and documentation were in compliance with the requirements specified in the TSs and procedures.
Fuel Handling Fuel handling activities and documentation were in compliance with the requirements specified in the TSs and procedures.


Enclosure REPORT DETAILS Summary of Facility Status The Washington State University (WSU, the lic ensee's) one megawatt (MW) TRIGA research and test reactor continued normal, routine operations. A review of the applicable records  
REPORT DETAILS Summary of Facility Status The Washington State University (WSU, the licensees) one megawatt (MW) TRIGA research and test reactor continued normal, routine operations. A review of the applicable records indicated that the reactor was operated as needed in support of education, operator training, and irradiation of various materials. During the inspection, the reactor was operated at levels up to one MW and in accordance with applicable procedures to support ongoing irradiation activities.
 
indicated that the reactor was operated as needed in support of education, operator training, and irradiation of various materials. During the inspection, the reactor was operated at levels up  
 
to one MW and in accordance with applicable procedures to support ongoing irradiation  
 
activities.


1. Operations Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (Inspection Procedure (IP) 69001)
1. Operations Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (Inspection Procedure (IP) 69001)
The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to verify compliance  
The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to verify compliance with technical specification (TS) Section 6.2 and the applicable procedures:
  * WSU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TSs dated September 30, 2011
  * Observation of selected operations activities on July 19, 2017
  * Scram Summary Log (S.1) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
  * Pulsing Summary Log (S.2) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
  * Washington State University Nuclear Science Center (WSUNSC)
Maintenance Log (O.8) from January 2016 to present
  * Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 14, 2017, entitled WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log, NRC Form Number (No.) 22, latest form revision (March 2015)
  * Selected entries on Reactor Start-Up Check-off (O.3) forms entitled WSUNSC Form No. 34, WSU Reactor Start-Up Check-off, latest form revision (October 2016) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  * WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
  * WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015
  * WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 1, entitled Responsibilities and Authority of Reactor Operating Staff, (not dated)
  * WSUNSC Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) No. 1, Standard Procedure for Use of the Reactor, (May 9. 2017)
  * WSUNSC SOP No. 2, Standard Procedure for Startup, Operation, and Shutdown of the Reactor, (May 9, 2017)
b. Observations and Findings Enclosure


with technical specification (TS) Section 6.2 and the applicable procedures:
  -2-Reactor operations were carried out following written procedures and in accordance with TS requirements. Shift staffing satisfied the minimum requirements for duty and on-call personnel. Quarterly audits were conducted by Reactor Safeguards Committee (RSC) personnel. Accurate correlation between reactor logs, scram logs, pulse logs, and maintenance logs was noted.
* WSU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TSs dated September 30, 2011
* Observation of selected operations activities on July 19, 2017
* Scram Summary Log (S.1) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Pulsing Summary Log (S.2) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Washington State University Nuclear Science Center (WSUNSC)
Maintenance Log (O.8) from January 2016 to present
* Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 14, 2017, entitled "WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log,"


NRC Form Number (No.) 22, latest form revision (March 2015)
Equipment problems and events were well documented and resolved, with the senior reactor operator (SRO) approval if required for restart of the reactor.
* Selected entries on Reactor Start-Up Check-off (O.3) forms entitled WSUNSC Form No. 34, "WSU Reactor Start-Up Check-off," latest form


revision (October 2016) for 2016 and to date in 2017
c. Conclusion The operational activities were found to be consistent with applicable TS and procedural requirements.
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor,"
 
for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated
 
August 19, 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for
 
the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 1, entitled "Responsibilities and Authority of Reactor Operating Staff," (not dated)
* WSUNSC Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) No. 1, "Standard Procedure for Use of the Reactor," (May 9. 2017)
* WSUNSC SOP No. 2, "Standard Procedure for Startup, Operation, and Shutdown of the Reactor," (May 9, 2017)
b. Observations and Findings Reactor operations were carried out following written procedures and in
 
accordance with TS requirements. Shift staffing satisfied the minimum
 
requirements for duty and on-call personnel. Quarterly audits were conducted by
 
Reactor Safeguards Committee (RSC) personnel. Accurate correlation between
 
reactor logs, scram logs, pulse logs, and maintenance logs was noted.
 
Equipment problems and events were we ll documented and resolved, with the senior reactor operator (SRO) approval if required for restart of the reactor.
 
c. Conclusion The operational activities were found to be consistent with applicable TS and  
 
procedural requirements.


2. Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
2. Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed  
To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
* Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 2017, entitled WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log, NRC Form No. 22, latest form revision May 2017
* Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 thru July 2017
* Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158
* Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and 2017
* Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equipment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC Form No. 40, entitled Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist, latest form revision July 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015 dated August 7, 2015
* WSUNSC SOP No. 5, Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, Removal, and Replacement, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 20, Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 23, Standard Procedure for Annual Fuel Inspection, dated May 9, 2017


selected aspects of:
  -3-
  * Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 2017, entitled "WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log," NRC
  * WSUNSC SOP No. 24, Standard Procedure for Fuel Burnup Calculation, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 25, Standard Procedure for Core Changes and Fuel Movement, dated March 12, 2015 b. Observations and Findings The Inspector determined that the daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual, annual, and other periodic checks, tests, and verifications for TS required limiting conditions for operation (LCO) were being completed as required. Extensive checklists were used to track completion of the various required surveillances and LCO verifications. The checklists included the date and name that each activity was completed. All recorded results observed by the inspector were within prescribed TSs and procedure parameters and in close agreement with the previous surveillance results.


Form No. 22, latest form revision May 2017
c. Conclusion The surveillance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements. The program for tracking and completing surveillance requirements was detailed and thorough.
* Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 thru July 2017
* Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158
* Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and 2017
* Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equi pment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC
 
Form No. 40, entitled "Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist,"
 
latest form revision July 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor,"
 
for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated
 
August 19, 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for
 
the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015 dated August 7, 2015
* WSUNSC SOP No. 5, "Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance," dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 11, "Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, Removal, and Replacement," dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 20, "Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations," dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 23, "Standard Procedure for Annual Fuel Inspection,"
dated May 9, 2017 * WSUNSC SOP No. 24, "Standard Procedure for Fuel Burnup Calculation,"
dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 25, "Standard Procedure for Core Changes and Fuel Movement," dated March 12, 2015
 
b. Observations and Findings The Inspector determined that the daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual, annual, and other periodic checks, tests, and verifications for TS required limiting
 
conditions for operation (LCO) were being completed as required. Extensive
 
checklists were used to track completion of the various required surveillances
 
and LCO verifications. The checklists included the date and name that each
 
activity was completed. All recorded results observed by the inspector were
 
within prescribed TSs and procedure parameters and in close agreement with
 
the previous surveillance results.
 
c. Conclusion The surveillance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and  
 
procedure requirements. The program for tracking and completing surveillance  
 
requirements was detailed and thorough.


3. Experiments a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
3. Experiments a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
To verify compliance with the licensee's program for conducting experiments and  
To verify compliance with the licensees program for conducting experiments and irradiations as outlined in TS Sections 3.6, 4.6, and 6.4.7 and in various procedures, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
 
  * WSUNSC Irradiation Data Log sheets for the period from January 2016 to the present
irradiations as outlined in TS Sections 3.6, 4.6, and 6.4.7 and in various  
* WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to the present
 
* Experiment approvals documented on WSUNSC Form No. 1, entitled Project Initiation Request Form, latest form revision dated March 2011, with the associated experiment overviews, safety reviews and analyses, isotope production data, accident analyses, and approvals
procedures, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:  
* SOP No. 1, Standard Procedure For Use Of The Reactor, latest revision dated March 12, 2015
  * WSUNSC Irradiation Data Log sheets for the period from January 2016 to the present * WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to the present * Experiment approvals documented on WSUNSC Form No. 1, entitled "Project Initiation Request Form," latest form revision dated March 2011, with the  
* SOP No. 2, Standard Procedure For Startup, Operations and Shutdown of The Reactor, latest revision dated May 9, 2017
 
* SOP No. 3, Standard Procedure For Performing Experiments Using The Reactor, latest revision dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings
associated experiment overviews, safety reviews and analyses, isotope  
 
production data, accident analyses, and approvals  
* SOP No. 1, "Standard Procedure For Use Of The Reactor," latest revision dated March 12, 2015  
* SOP No. 2, "Standard Procedure For Startup, Operations and Shutdown of The Reactor," latest revision dated May 9, 2017  
* SOP No. 3, "Standard Procedure For Performing Experiments Using The Reactor," latest revision dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings Various new experiments had been proposed since the last inspection. The


inspector verified that new experiments were reviewed and approved by a SRO  
  -4-Various new experiments had been proposed since the last inspection. The inspector verified that new experiments were reviewed and approved by a SRO and by either the Assistant Facility Director or the Facility Director. Certain experiments were also approved by the RSC when required. The inspector also verified that the experiments were completed under the supervision of the SRO and in accordance with TS requirements.


and by either the Assistant Facility Director or the Facility Director. Certain
The inspector reviewed the existing experiment and irradiation authorization documents, Irradiation Data Log sheets, Reactor Logbook, and interviewed staff members. It was noted that the information typically entered on the Irradiation Data Log sheets was now being entered into a data base developed by facility personnel. The appropriate data was recorded and the radioactive material produced was handled and controlled as required.


experiments were also approved by the RSC when required. The inspector also
c. Conclusion The conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements specified in the TSs, the experiment irradiation authorizations, and applicable procedures.
 
verified that the experiments were completed under the supervision of the SRO
 
and in accordance with TS requirements.
 
The inspector reviewed the existing experiment and irradiation authorization
 
documents, Irradiation Data Log sheets, Reactor Logbook, and interviewed staff
 
members. It was noted that the information typically entered on the Irradiation
 
Data Log sheets was now being entered into a data base developed by facility
 
personnel. The appropriate data was recorded and the radioactive material
 
produced was handled and controlled as required.
 
c. Conclusion The conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements  
 
specified in the TSs, the experiment irradiation authorizations, and applicable  
 
procedures.


4. Committees, Audits and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
4. Committees, Audits and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
In order to verify that the licensee had established and conducted reviews and  
In order to verify that the licensee had established and conducted reviews and audits as required in TS Section 6.4, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
* WSU RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Safety review and audit records documented on WSUNSC forms entitled, Reactor Safeguards Committee Facility Records Quarterly Audit, for the period from January 2016 through the present
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015 b. Observations and Findings The RSC membership satisfied TS requirements and the Committee's procedural rules. The RSC, or a subcommittee thereof, was required to hold semi-annual meetings each year. It was noted that three committee meetings were held in 2016, and two committee meetings to date in 2017.


audits as required in TS Section 6.4, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
Review of the committee meeting minutes indicated that the RSC provided appropriate guidance and direction for reactor operations. Additionally, the annual review of the radiation protection program and the biennial reviews of the
* WSU RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Safety review and audit records documented on WSUNSC forms entitled, "Reactor Safeguards Committee Facility Records Quarterly Audit," for the  


period from January 2016 through the present
  -5-standard operating procedures, the emergency plan (E-Plan), and the security plan had been conducted and documented.
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for


the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
Since the last inspection, audits of reactor facility records and reviews of operating abnormalities, changes to procedures, equipment changes, and proposed tests or experiments had been completed and documented. The inspector noted that audits were conducted during the meetings held by the RSC.
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for
 
the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015 b. Observations and Findings The RSC membership satisfied TS requirements and the Committee's procedural
 
rules. The RSC, or a subcommittee thereof, was required to hold semi-annual
 
meetings each year. It was noted that three committee meetings were held in
 
2016, and two committee meetings to date in 2017.
 
Review of the committee meeting minutes indicated that the RSC provided
 
appropriate guidance and direction for reactor operations. Additionally, the
 
annual review of the radiation protection program and the biennial reviews of the standard operating procedures, the emergency plan (E-Plan), and the security
 
plan had been conducted and documented.
 
Since the last inspection, audits of reactor facility records and reviews of  
 
operating abnormalities, changes to procedures, equipment changes, and  
 
proposed tests or experiments had been completed and documented. The  
 
inspector noted that audits were conducted during the meetings held by the RSC.


c. Conclusion The review and audit program was being completed acceptably by the RSC.
c. Conclusion The review and audit program was being completed acceptably by the RSC.


5. Emergency Preparedness a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
5. Emergency Preparedness a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
To ensure that the licensee was acceptably implementing the various aspects of  
To ensure that the licensee was acceptably implementing the various aspects of their emergency preparedness program, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
 
* WSUNSC SOP No. 15, Standard Procedure for Action in the Event of an Alarm, dated May 9, 2017
their emergency preparedness program, the inspector reviewed selected aspects  
* Emergency Preparedness Plan for the WSUNSC dated May 21, 2015
* Emergency drills and exercises for the past two years
* Administrative Requirements Schedule Log (A.4) sheets
* Training records for licensee staff and support personnel
* Emergency response facilities, supplies, equipment, and instrumentation
* Offsite support as documented in the Letter of Agreement with the hospital
* WSUNSC Short Form Emergency Procedure, latest revision dated November 21, 2008
* WSUNSC SOP No. 14, Standard Procedure in the Event of an Emergency Situation, dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings The E-Plan in use at the facility, entitled Emergency Preparedness Plan for the Nuclear Science Center, Washington State University, was being reviewed and updated as required by TSs.


of: * WSUNSC SOP No. 15, "Standard Procedure for Action in the Event of an Alarm," dated May 9, 2017
Emergency facilities, instrumentation, and equipment were being maintained and controlled, and supplies were being inventoried as required in the Emergency Preparedness Plan.
* Emergency Preparedness Plan for the WSUNSC dated May 21, 2015
* Emergency drills and exercises for the past two years
* Administrative Requirements Schedule Log (A.4) sheets
* Training records for licensee staff and support personnel
* Emergency response facilities, supplies, equipment, and instrumentation
* Offsite support as documented in the Letter of Agreement with the hospital
* WSUNSC Short Form Emergency Procedure, latest revision dated November 21, 2008
* WSUNSC SOP No. 14, "Standard Procedure in the Event of an Emergency Situation," dated May 9, 2017


b. Observations and Findings The E-Plan in use at the facility, entitled "Emergency Preparedness Plan for the
The Inspector determined through records review and through interviews with licensee personnel that emergency responders were knowledgeable of the proper actions to take in case of an emergency. The agreement with the Pullman Regional Hospital, which had been updated May 24, 2016.


Nuclear Science Center, Washington State University," was being reviewed and  
-6-Communications capabilities with the various campus, city, and county support groups were acceptable and off-site support for the facility was verified to be acceptable and in accordance with the Emergency Preparedness Plan. The alarm system had been tested weekly and monthly as stipulated in the Emergency Preparedness Plan.


updated as required by TSs.
The inspector determined that the emergency drills were being conducted as required by the Emergency Preparedness Plan. Critiques were written following the drills and they addressed problems noted during the conduct of the drill with assigned corrective actions.


Emergency facilities, instrumentation, and equipment were being maintained and
c. Conclusion The emergency preparedness program was conducted in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the E-Plan.
 
controlled, and supplies were being inventoried as required in the Emergency
 
Preparedness Plan.
 
The Inspector determined through records review and through interviews with
 
licensee personnel that emergency responders were knowledgeable of the
 
proper actions to take in case of an emergency. The agreement with the
 
Pullman Regional Hospital, which had been updated May 24, 2016. Communications capabilities with the various campus, city, and county support
 
groups were acceptable and off-site support for the facility was verified to be
 
acceptable and in accordance with the Emergency Preparedness Plan. The
 
alarm system had been tested weekly and monthly as stipulated in the
 
Emergency Preparedness Plan.
 
The inspector determined that the emergency drills were being conducted as
 
required by the Emergency Preparedness Plan. Critiques were written following
 
the drills and they addressed problems noted during the conduct of the drill with
 
assigned corrective actions.
 
c. Conclusion The emergency preparedness program was conducted in accordance with the  
 
requirements stipulated in the E-Plan.


6. Maintenance Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
6. Maintenance Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed  
To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:
 
  * Reactor Operations Summary Sheets for 2016 and to date in 2017
selected aspects of:  
* Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  * Reactor Operations Summary Sheets for 2016 and to date in 2017  
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and to date in 2017  
* Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and to date in 2017  
* Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158  
* RSC meeting minutes 2016 and to date in 2017
* Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017  
* Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
* RSC meeting minutes 2016 and to date in 2017  
* Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equipment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC Form No. 40, entitled Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist, latest form revision June 2016
* Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017  
* WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to date in 2017
* Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equi pment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC  
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
 
* WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015
Form No. 40, entitled "Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist,"
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 5, entitled Surveillance Documentation Review, (not dated)
 
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 6, entitled Performance of Maintenance Activities, (not dated)
latest form revision June 2016  
* WSUNSC SOP No. 5, Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to date in 2017  
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for  
 
the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016  
* WSU Annual Report entitled "Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor," for  
 
the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015  
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 5, entitled "Surveillance Documentation Review," (not dated)  
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 6, entitled "Performance of Maintenance Activities," (not dated)  
* WSUNSC SOP No. 5, "Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance," dated May 9, 2017 * WSUNSC SOP No. 11, "Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance," dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 20, "Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations," dated May 9, 2017  
 
b. Observations and Findings The Inspector noted that routine and preventive maintenance was controlled by, and documented in, the maintenance or reactor operations logs and the monthly
 
Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklists consistent with the TSs
 
and licensee procedures. Unscheduled maintenance or equipment repair was
 
reviewed to determine if the work required a Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.59 evaluation. Verifications and operational systems checks were performed following completion of the maintenance to ensure system
 
operability before the equipment was returned to service.


c. Conclusion The maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and  
  -7-
* WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 20, Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations, dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings The Inspector noted that routine and preventive maintenance was controlled by, and documented in, the maintenance or reactor operations logs and the monthly Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklists consistent with the TSs and licensee procedures. Unscheduled maintenance or equipment repair was reviewed to determine if the work required a Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.59 evaluation. Verifications and operational systems checks were performed following completion of the maintenance to ensure system operability before the equipment was returned to service.


procedure requirements.
c. Conclusion The maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements.


7. Fuel Handling a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
7. Fuel Handling a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)
The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to ensure that the  
The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to ensure that the licensee was complying with TS Sections 4.1.6, 5.2, 6.8, and 6.9:
 
  * Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017
licensee was complying with TS Sections 4.1.6, 5.2, 6.8, and 6.9:  
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and 2017
  * Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017  
* Core Change Log (O.6) through July 2017
* Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and 2017  
* Fuel handling equipment and instrumentation
* Core Change Log (O.6) through July 2017  
* Selected WSUNSC Reactor Log sheets from 2016 through the present
* Fuel handling equipment and instrumentation  
* WSU special nuclear material Physical Inventory Log sheets dated March 21, 2012, from 2016 through the present
* Selected WSUNSC Reactor Log sheets from 2016 through the present  
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 9, entitled Special Nuclear Material Accountability Plan, (not dated)
* WSU special nuclear material Physical Inventory Log sheets dated March 21, 2012, from 2016 through the present  
* WSUNSC SOP No. 23, Standard Procedure Annual Fuel Inspection, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 9, entitled "Special Nuclear Material Accountability Plan," (not dated)  
* WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
* WSUNSC SOP No. 23, "Standard Procedure Annual Fuel Inspection," dated May 9, 2017  
* WSUNSC SOP No. 11, "Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance," dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings Procedures for refueling, fuel movement, and TSs required surveillances ensured
 
controlled operations for Core 35-A. A detailed plan for performing fuel
 
movement was required to be developed prior to each fuel movement operation.
 
The inspector noted that the data recorded for fuel movements that had been
 
conducted in the past were acceptable and were required to be cross referenced
 
in the operations logs. Log entries, indicating fuel movements, were completed
 
under the direct supervision of a SRO as required.
 
Through records review and interviews with licensee personnel, the inspector
 
determined that various fuel movement operations had been conducted since the
 
last inspection in this area. The most significant fuel movement involved
 
removing fuel bundles from the core to allow for fuel inspection in
 
January 2016. The inspector verified that a detailed plan had been completed for
 
the fuel movement activities as required. The plan had been reviewed and
 
approved by the Facility Assistant Director and the Facility Director as required.
 
c. Conclusion The fuel handling activities and documentation were as required by facility TSs
 
and procedures.
 
8. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on July 20, 2017, with members of
 
licensee management. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in
 
detail the inspection findings. The licensee acknowledged the inspection results
 
presented and did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed


by the inspector during the inspection.
  -8-b. Observations and Findings Procedures for refueling, fuel movement, and TSs required surveillances ensured controlled operations for Core 35-A. A detailed plan for performing fuel movement was required to be developed prior to each fuel movement operation.


PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee Personnel
The inspector noted that the data recorded for fuel movements that had been conducted in the past were acceptable and were required to be cross referenced in the operations logs. Log entries, indicating fuel movements, were completed under the direct supervision of a SRO as required.


C. Hines Assistant Director, Nuclear Science Center T. LaVoie Senior Reactor Operator D. Wall Director, Nuclear Science Center H. Bennet Senior Reactor Operator C. Jackson Administrative Assistant
Through records review and interviews with licensee personnel, the inspector determined that various fuel movement operations had been conducted since the last inspection in this area. The most significant fuel movement involved removing fuel bundles from the core to allow for fuel inspection in January 2016. The inspector verified that a detailed plan had been completed for the fuel movement activities as required. The plan had been reviewed and approved by the Facility Assistant Director and the Facility Director as required.


INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors
c. Conclusion The fuel handling activities and documentation were as required by facility TSs and procedures.


ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened None
8. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on July 20, 2017, with members of licensee management. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. The licensee acknowledged the inspection results presented and did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during the inspection.


Closed None PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED E-Plan Emergency Plan IP Inspection Procedure LCO Limiting Condition for Operation MW Megawatt No. Number NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RSC Reactor Safeguards Committee SOP Standard Operating Procedure SRO Senior Reactor Operator TS Technical Specification WSU Washington State University WSUNSC Washington State University Nuclear Science Center
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee Personnel C. Hines Assistant Director, Nuclear Science Center T. LaVoie Senior Reactor Operator D. Wall Director, Nuclear Science Center H. Bennet Senior Reactor Operator C. Jackson Administrative Assistant INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened None Closed None PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED E-Plan Emergency Plan IP Inspection Procedure LCO Limiting Condition for Operation MW Megawatt No. Number NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RSC Reactor Safeguards Committee SOP Standard Operating Procedure SRO Senior Reactor Operator TS Technical Specification WSU Washington State University WSUNSC Washington State University Nuclear Science Center
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:47, 29 October 2019

Washington State University - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Routine Inspection Report 05000027/2017201
ML17215B522
Person / Time
Site: Washington State University
Issue date: 08/17/2017
From: Anthony Mendiola
Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch
To: Keane C
Washington State Univ
Morlang G
References
IR 2017201
Download: ML17215B522 (16)


Text

ust 17, 2017

SUBJECT:

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-027/2017-201

Dear Dr. Keane:

From July 17 - 20, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) conducted an inspection at your Washington State University TRIGA research reactor located in the Nuclear Science Center. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on July 20, 2017, with Dr. Donald Wall, Director of the Nuclear Science Center, and members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of noncompliance were identified. No response to this letter is required.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Mr. Gary Morlang at 301-415-4092 or electronic mail at Gary.Morlang@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-27 License No. R-76 Enclosure:

As stated cc: w/enclosure: See next page

ML17215B522; concurrence via e-mail NRC-002 OFFICE NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB* NRR/DPR/PROB NAME GMorlang NParker AMendiola DATE 8/14/17 8/14/17 8/17/17

Washington State University Docket No.50-027 cc:

Director Division of Radiation Protection Department of Health 7171 Cleanwater Lane, Bldg #5 P.O. Box 47827 Olympia, WA 98504-7827 Mr. David Clark, Director Washington State University Radiation Safety Office P.O. Box 641302 Pullman, WA 99164 1302 Dr. Ken Nash Chair Washington State University Reactor Safeguards Committee Nuclear Radiation Center P.O. Box 641300 Pullman, WA 99164 1300 Mr. Corey Hines, Reactor Supervisor Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center P.O. Box 641300 Pullman, WA 99164 1300 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-8300

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Docket No.50-027 License No. R-076 Report No. 50-027/2017-201 Licensee: Washington State University Facility: Nuclear Science Center Location: Pullman, WA Dates: July 17 - 20, 2017 Inspector: Gary Morlang Approved by: Anthony J. Mendiola, Chief Research and Test Reactors Oversight Branch Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Washington State University Nuclear Science Center NRC Report No. 50-027/2017-201 The primary focus of this routine, announced inspection was the on-site review of selected aspects of the Washington State University (the licensees) Class II research and test reactor safety program including: (1) operations logs and records, (2) surveillance and limiting conditions for operation, (3) experiments, (4) committees, audits and reviews (5) emergency preparedness, (6) maintenance logs and records, and (7) fuel handling since the last U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection of these areas. The licensee's program was acceptably directed toward the protection of public health and safety and in compliance with NRC requirements.

Operations Logs and Records Operational activities were consistent with applicable technical specifications (TSs) and procedural requirements.

Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations The program for tracking and completing surveillance checks and limiting conditions for operation satisfied TS requirements.

Experiments Conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements specified in the TSs, the applicable experiment irradiation authorizations, and associated procedures.

Committees, Audits and Reviews The review and audit program was being conducted by the Reactor Safeguards Committee.

The composition and meeting frequency satisfied requirements specified in the TSs.

Emergency Preparedness The Emergency Plan (E-Plan) and Implementing Procedures were being reviewed and updated as required.

Emergency response facilities and equipment were being maintained as required and responders were knowledgeable of proper actions to be taken in case of an emergency.

Off-site support was acceptable and communications capabilities were adequate.

Annual drills were being conducted and critiques were being held as required by the E-Plan.

-2-Maintenance Logs and Records Maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements.

Fuel Handling Fuel handling activities and documentation were in compliance with the requirements specified in the TSs and procedures.

REPORT DETAILS Summary of Facility Status The Washington State University (WSU, the licensees) one megawatt (MW) TRIGA research and test reactor continued normal, routine operations. A review of the applicable records indicated that the reactor was operated as needed in support of education, operator training, and irradiation of various materials. During the inspection, the reactor was operated at levels up to one MW and in accordance with applicable procedures to support ongoing irradiation activities.

1. Operations Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (Inspection Procedure (IP) 69001)

The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to verify compliance with technical specification (TS) Section 6.2 and the applicable procedures:

  • WSU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TSs dated September 30, 2011
  • Observation of selected operations activities on July 19, 2017
  • Scram Summary Log (S.1) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Pulsing Summary Log (S.2) entries for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Washington State University Nuclear Science Center (WSUNSC)

Maintenance Log (O.8) from January 2016 to present

  • Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 14, 2017, entitled WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log, NRC Form Number (No.) 22, latest form revision (March 2015)
  • Selected entries on Reactor Start-Up Check-off (O.3) forms entitled WSUNSC Form No. 34, WSU Reactor Start-Up Check-off, latest form revision (October 2016) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015
  • WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 1, entitled Responsibilities and Authority of Reactor Operating Staff, (not dated)
  • WSUNSC Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) No. 1, Standard Procedure for Use of the Reactor, (May 9. 2017)
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 2, Standard Procedure for Startup, Operation, and Shutdown of the Reactor, (May 9, 2017)

b. Observations and Findings Enclosure

-2-Reactor operations were carried out following written procedures and in accordance with TS requirements. Shift staffing satisfied the minimum requirements for duty and on-call personnel. Quarterly audits were conducted by Reactor Safeguards Committee (RSC) personnel. Accurate correlation between reactor logs, scram logs, pulse logs, and maintenance logs was noted.

Equipment problems and events were well documented and resolved, with the senior reactor operator (SRO) approval if required for restart of the reactor.

c. Conclusion The operational activities were found to be consistent with applicable TS and procedural requirements.

2. Surveillance and Limiting Conditions for Operations a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 through July 2017, entitled WSU Nuclear Science Center Reactor Log, NRC Form No. 22, latest form revision May 2017
  • Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017
  • Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 thru July 2017
  • Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158
  • Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and 2017
  • Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equipment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC Form No. 40, entitled Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist, latest form revision July 2016
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015 dated August 7, 2015
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 5, Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, Removal, and Replacement, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 20, Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 23, Standard Procedure for Annual Fuel Inspection, dated May 9, 2017

-3-

  • WSUNSC SOP No. 24, Standard Procedure for Fuel Burnup Calculation, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 25, Standard Procedure for Core Changes and Fuel Movement, dated March 12, 2015 b. Observations and Findings The Inspector determined that the daily, weekly, monthly, semiannual, annual, and other periodic checks, tests, and verifications for TS required limiting conditions for operation (LCO) were being completed as required. Extensive checklists were used to track completion of the various required surveillances and LCO verifications. The checklists included the date and name that each activity was completed. All recorded results observed by the inspector were within prescribed TSs and procedure parameters and in close agreement with the previous surveillance results.

c. Conclusion The surveillance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements. The program for tracking and completing surveillance requirements was detailed and thorough.

3. Experiments a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

To verify compliance with the licensees program for conducting experiments and irradiations as outlined in TS Sections 3.6, 4.6, and 6.4.7 and in various procedures, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • WSUNSC Irradiation Data Log sheets for the period from January 2016 to the present
  • WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to the present
  • Experiment approvals documented on WSUNSC Form No. 1, entitled Project Initiation Request Form, latest form revision dated March 2011, with the associated experiment overviews, safety reviews and analyses, isotope production data, accident analyses, and approvals
  • SOP No. 1, Standard Procedure For Use Of The Reactor, latest revision dated March 12, 2015
  • SOP No. 2, Standard Procedure For Startup, Operations and Shutdown of The Reactor, latest revision dated May 9, 2017
  • SOP No. 3, Standard Procedure For Performing Experiments Using The Reactor, latest revision dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings

-4-Various new experiments had been proposed since the last inspection. The inspector verified that new experiments were reviewed and approved by a SRO and by either the Assistant Facility Director or the Facility Director. Certain experiments were also approved by the RSC when required. The inspector also verified that the experiments were completed under the supervision of the SRO and in accordance with TS requirements.

The inspector reviewed the existing experiment and irradiation authorization documents, Irradiation Data Log sheets, Reactor Logbook, and interviewed staff members. It was noted that the information typically entered on the Irradiation Data Log sheets was now being entered into a data base developed by facility personnel. The appropriate data was recorded and the radioactive material produced was handled and controlled as required.

c. Conclusion The conduct and control of experiments and irradiations met the requirements specified in the TSs, the experiment irradiation authorizations, and applicable procedures.

4. Committees, Audits and Reviews a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

In order to verify that the licensee had established and conducted reviews and audits as required in TS Section 6.4, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • WSU RSC meeting minutes for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Safety review and audit records documented on WSUNSC forms entitled, Reactor Safeguards Committee Facility Records Quarterly Audit, for the period from January 2016 through the present
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015 b. Observations and Findings The RSC membership satisfied TS requirements and the Committee's procedural rules. The RSC, or a subcommittee thereof, was required to hold semi-annual meetings each year. It was noted that three committee meetings were held in 2016, and two committee meetings to date in 2017.

Review of the committee meeting minutes indicated that the RSC provided appropriate guidance and direction for reactor operations. Additionally, the annual review of the radiation protection program and the biennial reviews of the

-5-standard operating procedures, the emergency plan (E-Plan), and the security plan had been conducted and documented.

Since the last inspection, audits of reactor facility records and reviews of operating abnormalities, changes to procedures, equipment changes, and proposed tests or experiments had been completed and documented. The inspector noted that audits were conducted during the meetings held by the RSC.

c. Conclusion The review and audit program was being completed acceptably by the RSC.

5. Emergency Preparedness a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

To ensure that the licensee was acceptably implementing the various aspects of their emergency preparedness program, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • WSUNSC SOP No. 15, Standard Procedure for Action in the Event of an Alarm, dated May 9, 2017
  • Emergency drills and exercises for the past two years
  • Administrative Requirements Schedule Log (A.4) sheets
  • Training records for licensee staff and support personnel
  • Emergency response facilities, supplies, equipment, and instrumentation
  • Offsite support as documented in the Letter of Agreement with the hospital
  • WSUNSC Short Form Emergency Procedure, latest revision dated November 21, 2008
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 14, Standard Procedure in the Event of an Emergency Situation, dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings The E-Plan in use at the facility, entitled Emergency Preparedness Plan for the Nuclear Science Center, Washington State University, was being reviewed and updated as required by TSs.

Emergency facilities, instrumentation, and equipment were being maintained and controlled, and supplies were being inventoried as required in the Emergency Preparedness Plan.

The Inspector determined through records review and through interviews with licensee personnel that emergency responders were knowledgeable of the proper actions to take in case of an emergency. The agreement with the Pullman Regional Hospital, which had been updated May 24, 2016.

-6-Communications capabilities with the various campus, city, and county support groups were acceptable and off-site support for the facility was verified to be acceptable and in accordance with the Emergency Preparedness Plan. The alarm system had been tested weekly and monthly as stipulated in the Emergency Preparedness Plan.

The inspector determined that the emergency drills were being conducted as required by the Emergency Preparedness Plan. Critiques were written following the drills and they addressed problems noted during the conduct of the drill with assigned corrective actions.

c. Conclusion The emergency preparedness program was conducted in accordance with the requirements stipulated in the E-Plan.

6. Maintenance Logs and Records a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

To verify compliance with TS Sections 3, 4, and 5, the inspector reviewed selected aspects of:

  • Reactor Operations Summary Sheets for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Maintenance Log, Volume 1 (O.8), pages 148-158
  • Preventative Maintenance Checklists (O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • RSC meeting minutes 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Power Calibration Log forms (also in O.2) for 2016 and to date in 2017
  • Monthly Console and Auxiliary Equipment Checklist Log (O.9) containing documentation of equipment maintenance as indicated on the WSUNSC Form No. 40, entitled Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklist, latest form revision June 2016
  • WSUNSC Reactor Operating Log (O.1) sheets from January 2016 to date in 2017
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, dated August 19, 2016
  • WSU Annual Report entitled Annual Report on the Operation of the Washington State University Nuclear Radiation Center TRIGA Reactor, for the periods from July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015, dated August 7, 2015
  • WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 5, entitled Surveillance Documentation Review, (not dated)
  • WSUNSC Administrative Procedure, Section No. 6, entitled Performance of Maintenance Activities, (not dated)
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 5, Standard Procedure for Performing Preventive Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017

-7-

  • WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 20, Standard Procedure for Performing Power Calibrations, dated May 9, 2017 b. Observations and Findings The Inspector noted that routine and preventive maintenance was controlled by, and documented in, the maintenance or reactor operations logs and the monthly Console Auxiliary Equipment Maintenance Checklists consistent with the TSs and licensee procedures. Unscheduled maintenance or equipment repair was reviewed to determine if the work required a Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.59 evaluation. Verifications and operational systems checks were performed following completion of the maintenance to ensure system operability before the equipment was returned to service.

c. Conclusion The maintenance logs, records, performance, and reviews satisfied TSs and procedure requirements.

7. Fuel Handling a. Inspection Scope (IP 69001)

The inspector reviewed selected aspects of the following to ensure that the licensee was complying with TS Sections 4.1.6, 5.2, 6.8, and 6.9:

  • Control Element Inspection Log (O.5) for 2016 and 2017
  • Monthly Core Reactivity Parameters Log (O.7) for 2016 and 2017
  • Core Change Log (O.6) through July 2017
  • Fuel handling equipment and instrumentation
  • Selected WSUNSC Reactor Log sheets from 2016 through the present
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 23, Standard Procedure Annual Fuel Inspection, dated May 9, 2017
  • WSUNSC SOP No. 11, Standard Procedure for Control Element Maintenance, dated May 9, 2017

-8-b. Observations and Findings Procedures for refueling, fuel movement, and TSs required surveillances ensured controlled operations for Core 35-A. A detailed plan for performing fuel movement was required to be developed prior to each fuel movement operation.

The inspector noted that the data recorded for fuel movements that had been conducted in the past were acceptable and were required to be cross referenced in the operations logs. Log entries, indicating fuel movements, were completed under the direct supervision of a SRO as required.

Through records review and interviews with licensee personnel, the inspector determined that various fuel movement operations had been conducted since the last inspection in this area. The most significant fuel movement involved removing fuel bundles from the core to allow for fuel inspection in January 2016. The inspector verified that a detailed plan had been completed for the fuel movement activities as required. The plan had been reviewed and approved by the Facility Assistant Director and the Facility Director as required.

c. Conclusion The fuel handling activities and documentation were as required by facility TSs and procedures.

8. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on July 20, 2017, with members of licensee management. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. The licensee acknowledged the inspection results presented and did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during the inspection.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee Personnel C. Hines Assistant Director, Nuclear Science Center T. LaVoie Senior Reactor Operator D. Wall Director, Nuclear Science Center H. Bennet Senior Reactor Operator C. Jackson Administrative Assistant INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 69001 Class II Research and Test Reactors ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened None Closed None PARTIAL LIST OF ACRONYMS USED E-Plan Emergency Plan IP Inspection Procedure LCO Limiting Condition for Operation MW Megawatt No. Number NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RSC Reactor Safeguards Committee SOP Standard Operating Procedure SRO Senior Reactor Operator TS Technical Specification WSU Washington State University WSUNSC Washington State University Nuclear Science Center