ML17249A406: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/06/2017
| issue date = 09/06/2017
| title = NRC Appeal Response to Davis-Besse Force on Force Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-02
| title = NRC Appeal Response to Davis-Besse Force on Force Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-02
| author name = Bailey M G
| author name = Bailey M
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR/DSO
| author affiliation = NRC/NSIR/DSO
| addressee name = Ellis J D
| addressee name = Ellis J
| addressee affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| docket = 05000346
| docket = 05000346
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000346/2017201]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000346/2017201]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION 
{{#Wiki_filter:SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
  September 6, 2017
                                          September 6, 2017
Mr. James D. Ellis
Director, Fleet Security Program
Mr. James D. Ellis Director, Fleet Security Program  
341 White Pond Drive
341 White Pond Drive  
Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1
Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1  
Akron, OH 44320
Akron, OH 44320 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED  
SUBJECT:         RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH
OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE  
                  ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED
EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND 05000346/2017201-02 Dear Mr. Ellis:
                  OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE
The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017, appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's decision to continue to use two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force exercise. Your original dispute was submitted on August 29, 2017, and the NRC staff's initial decision was issued on August 31, 2017.  
                  EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND
                  05000346/2017201-02
In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data,  
Dear Mr. Ellis:
(3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and  
The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017,
controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy.  
appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs decision to continue to use
The NRC's detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item  
two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force
05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards  
exercise. Your original dispute was submitted on August 29, 2017, and the NRC staffs initial
Information. The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.
decision was issued on August 31, 2017.
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION  J. Ellis 2  SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch, DSO, of the NRC's decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to
In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC
appeal the decision to me.  I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017.  After
force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and
further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed
concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the
item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise.  Sincerely,  /RA/ 
following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data,
Marissa G. Bailey, Director
(3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and
Division of Security Operations
controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy.
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
The NRCs detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to
  Enclosure:
Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item
NRC Response to Disputed Item
05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards
  05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02
Information.
  The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated
cc w/enclosure:  William Willis, Manager, Site Security 
  from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION J. Ellis 3  SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED
                                    SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE
EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND 
05000346/2017201-02  DATE:  SEPTEMBER 6, 2017
  DISTRIBUTION:  K. Riemer, DRS, RIII
ADAMS Accession No. ML17249A406 OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO NAME J. Berry  C. Johnson  M. Bailey DATE 9/ 6  /17    9  / 6  /17    9  / 6  /17    OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 


                                    SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
J. Ellis                                        2
Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch,
DSO, of the NRCs decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to
appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017. After
further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed
item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise.
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
                                              Marissa G. Bailey, Director
                                              Division of Security Operations
                                              Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
Enclosure:
NRC Response to Disputed Item
  05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02
cc w/enclosure: William Willis, Manager, Site Security
                                    SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
ML17249A406
OFFICE      NSIR/DSO/SPEB      NSIR/DSO/SPEB        NSIR/DSO
NAME        J. Berry          C. Johnson          M. Bailey
DATE        9/ 6 /17          9 / 6 /17            9 / 6 /17
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:01, 29 October 2019

NRC Appeal Response to Davis-Besse Force on Force Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-02
ML17249A406
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/2017
From: Marissa Bailey
Division of Security Operations
To: Ellis J
- No Known Affiliation
Josh Berry
References
2017201-01, 2017201-02
Download: ML17249A406 (3)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000346/2017201

Text

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

September 6, 2017

Mr. James D. Ellis

Director, Fleet Security Program

341 White Pond Drive

Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1

Akron, OH 44320

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH

ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED

OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE

EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND

05000346/2017201-02

Dear Mr. Ellis:

The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017,

appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs decision to continue to use

two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force

exercise. Your original dispute was submitted on August 29, 2017, and the NRC staffs initial

decision was issued on August 31, 2017.

In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC

force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and

concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the

following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data,

(3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and

controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your sites protective strategy.

The NRCs detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to

Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item

05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards

Information.

The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated

from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

J. Ellis 2

Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch,

DSO, of the NRCs decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to

appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017. After

further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed

item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Marissa G. Bailey, Director

Division of Security Operations

Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

Enclosure:

NRC Response to Disputed Item

05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02

cc w/enclosure: William Willis, Manager, Site Security

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

ML17249A406

OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO

NAME J. Berry C. Johnson M. Bailey

DATE 9/ 6 /17 9 / 6 /17 9 / 6 /17

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17249A406&oldid=2000906"