ML18018A946: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18018A946
| number = ML18018A946
| issue date = 02/27/1978
| issue date = 02/27/1978
| title = Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 - Letter Enclosing a Pleading Entitled Request for Extension of Latest Completion Date.
| title = Letter Enclosing a Pleading Entitled Request for Extension of Latest Completion Date.
| author name = Thomas E B
| author name = Thomas E
| author affiliation = LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| author affiliation = LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| addressee name = Case E G
| addressee name = Case E
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000410
| docket = 05000410
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)D1STRIBUT ION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-4i0 REC: CASF E 6 NRC QRG: THOMAS E B LEBOEUF LAMB LEIBY ET AL DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
YES  
D1STRIBUT ION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL                         50-4i0 REC: CASF E 6                         QRG: THOMAS E B                   DOCDATE: 02/27/78 NRC                                LEBOEUF LAMB LEIBY ET AL         DATE RCVD: 02/27/78 DOCTYPE:     LETTER     NOTARIZED: YES                                     COPIES RECEIVED


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
FQWARDING PLEADING ENTITLED: "REQUEST FOR EXTENSION QF LATEST COMPLETION DATE" i RE CONSTRUCTION CQMPLETIQN OF UNIT 2.DOCDATE: 02/27/78 DATE RCVD: 02/27/78 COPIES RECEIVED LTR i ENCL i0'LANT NAME: NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2'REVIEWER INITIAL: X JM DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL: DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS REQUESTS FQR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)(DISTRIBUTION CODE B006>FQR ACTION: FOR INFO: FOR INFO: INTERNAL: EXTERNAL: BR CHIEF VARGA++W/ENCL LIC ASST SERVICE4+W/ENCL MQQR~t f/ENG CL.G FILE~~~W/ENCL I~HF~NCL T ABELL++W/ENCL LPDR S OSWEGO.NY4~<W/ENCL ACRS CAT 34H~W/ib ENCL PROJ MGR KANE>+W/ENCL REGAN~+W/ENCL DUNCAN~~~W/ENCL NRC PDR4~+W/ENCL J MILLER~~W/ENCL DISTRIBUTlON:
LTR i    ENCL i0 FQWARDING PLEADING ENTITLED: "REQUEST FOR EXTENSION QF LATEST COMPLETION DATE" i RE CONSTRUCTION CQMPLETIQN OF UNIT 2.
LTR 30 ENCL 30 SIZE: iP+5P+2P".I+88%0l%%%%%%+%%W%+%%%%%%%%+SHHI
'LANT       NAME: NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2                       'REVIEWER INITIAL: X JM DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL:
%%%%%%CONTROL NBR: 780600004 if THE END J't~g$l~
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS REQUESTS FQR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)
3 il I i" 22(I I757 N STREET, N.W.WAsHINGTQN, D.C.20036 LEBoEUFI LAMB, LEIBY 8c tvtAGRAE LEON A.ALLKNi JR.JOSEPH E.BACHCLDER, II2 ERNEST S.BALLARD.JR.G.S.PCTER BERGEN 4 GCOFFRY D.C.BEST DAVID P.BICKS TAYLOR R.BRIGGS CHARLES N.BURGER THOMAS C.BURKE ROGER D.FELDMAN 04 CVGENE R.FIDELL ic JACOB FRIEDLANDCR GCRARD GIORDANO DONALD J.GREENE JAMES A.G REER,IZ 4 JOHN L.GROSE 4 DOUGLAS W.HAWCS CARL D.HOBELMAN MICHAEL IOVCNKO JAM CS F.JOHNSON, 4&#x17d;RONALD D.JONES LCX K.LARSON i 4 GRANT S.LCWIS K IM BA W.LOVE JOY CAMERON F.MAC RAK 4 CAMCRON F.MACRACgxX 4 GCRARD A.MAHCR SHEILA H.MARSHALL JAMES G, McCLROY JAMES P.McGRANERY, JR.i 4 PHILIP PALMER McGVIGAN HARVEY A.NAPIKR JAMCS O'ALLEY,JR.4 J~MICHAEL PARISH WILLIAM W.ROSEN BLATT JOHN A.RUDY PAUL G.RUSSELL PATRICK J.SCOGNAMIGLIO HAROLD M.SCIDEL HALCYON G.SKINNER JOSEPH S.STRAUSS SAMUEL M.SUGDKN CUBE NC B.THOMAS.JR.I.EONARD M.TROSTEN~4 HARRY H.VOIGT ic H~RICHARD WACHTKL GCRARD P.WATSON THOMAS A.2ICRK TKLCPHONK 202 457 7500 CASLK ADDRK88 LCSWIN<WASHINGTONi 0 C.TCLKX: 440274 TELECOPIER 202 457 7543 RANDALL J.LtSOKVF,JR.
(DISTRIBUTION CODE B006>
I929 I975 HORACE R.LAMB l934 I977 ADRIAN C~LKIBY I952 I975 I40 BROADWAY NKW YORK,N.Y.I0005 TELKPHONK 2I2 259 IIOO CABLE ADDRESS LKBWIN>NKW YORK TELEX: 4234IO RESIDENT PARTNERS WASHINGTON OFFICE 4 ADMITTCD TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR Mr.Edson G.Case Acting Director office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Cori;ssiOn Nashington, D.C.20555 i.,0~3%H I I+~i l II i 4 j3dl~~II.:1 7 Re: Niagara, mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mfle Poi'.nt Uni,t 2 Docket.No.50-43.0.
FQR ACTION:       BR   CHIEF VARGA++W/ENCL            PROJ MGR KANE>+W/ENCL LIC ASST SERVICE4+W/ENCL FOR  INFO:        MQQR~t f/ENG                       REGAN~+W/ENCL FOR  INFO:                      CL                   DUNCAN~~~W/ENCL INTERNAL:          .G FILE~~~W/ENCL                NRC PDR4~+W/ENCL I     ~HF~NCL                     J MILLER~~W/ENCL T ABELL++W/ENCL EXTERNAL:          LPDR S OSWEGO. NY4~<W/ENCL ACRS     CAT 34H~W/ib ENCL DISTRIBUTlON:         LTR 30       ENCL 30                       CONTROL NBR:  780600004 SIZE: iP+5P+2P
            %%%%%%+%%W%+%%%%%%%%+SHHI %%%%%%
if
".I +88%0l                                      THE END


==Dear Mr.Case:==
J't
As counsel for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, X enclose herewith an ori;ginal and 10 copies of a pleading entitled"Request foz Extension of Latest Completi.on Date." Very truly yours, LEBOEUFq LAMBF LEXBY 8(MACRAE Eugen B.Thomas, Jr.Partner Attorneys for Niagara Mohawk Power Corpoxat.ion Enclosures
~     g$ l ~
,<>@<>000<
\I~m I II f lp I BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of))NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION
)(Nine Mile Point Unit 2))Docket No.50-410 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE Pursuant to Section 2.109 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Section 50.55(b)of the Commission's Regulations, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, holder of Construction Permit No.CPPR-112, hereby requests an extension of its latest completion date for Nine Mile Point Unit 2.In support of such request, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows: (1)In the aforesaid construction permit, the latest completion date specified is July 31, 1978.At this time, the project is about 20 percent complete and cannot be finished within the time specified in the construction permit;(2)Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation requests that the latest completion date in the construction permit be extended to December 31, 1984; C~~l~~
(3)In late 1973, the then President of the United States publicly announced the seriousness of the energy crisis confronting'the United States.Immediately thereafter and continuing to, this time, there has been.a reduction in'the,.use of electricity and, consequently, for power demand in Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's service area.Accordingly, the need forthis facility to produce power has been postponed.
(4)Niagara Mohawk Power, Corporation, along with other P privately owned public utilities, experienced difficulty in obtaining,, funds for, construction." at rates which were considered reasonable.
This lack of funds at reasonable rates has caused the, construction of the facility to be delayed.(5)In addition to the above, the following unanticipated causes.for delay have occurred during the construction period.Additional time is required,due to design changes, such as safety/relief valve piping relocation, required.to mitigate Mark II containment dynamic loads.This area is under Commission review, and additional requirements may result from that review.
~~
~~Additiona1 time is required due to intensive study of geological features and phenomena as.reported, to the Commission in Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's letter dated December 13, 1976.iii.Additional time is required due to a change , from once-through to closed loop circulating water cooling.This change, was reported to the Commission by letter dated July 19, 1976.iv.Additional time is required due to complete redesign of.electrical raceway systems and major structural changes in the Reactor Building, Control Building, and cable tunnels to implement the Regulatory Guide 1.75 separation requirements.
v.Additional time is required due, to labor problems including work stoppages in 1976 and 1977.vi.Additional time is required due to shortage of qualified welders, and material procurement delays, such as for the primary containment liner.
~~
vii.Additional time is required due to a delay in the granting of the original Construction Permit which was not reflected in the previously revised dates for earliest and latest completion of the facility (see Attachment 1).viii.Additional time is required to implement NRC requirements for flood, protection of ECCS pumps.ix.Additional time is.required due to the implementation of pipe whip protection require-ments similar to those expressed in Regulatory Guide 1.46 which impacted the schedule for completion of pipe stress analysis and liner fabric'ation.
xo Additional time is required due to the imposition of" Regulatory Guide 1.89 requirements on Class IE Equipment Vendors which has resulted in shortages of acceptable vendors.
t~~
(6)In Niagara.Mohawk Power Corporation's opinion, the requested action involves no significant hazards consideration; good.cause..has been, shown for the delay;and the extension'f the latest completion date which has been, requested,.
is for a reasonable period.WHEREFORE, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.requests that the latest date.in.,Construction Permit No.CPPR-112 be.extended until December 31, 1984.Respectfully submitted, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION B Gerald.Rhode Vice President--System Project Management Subscribed and sworn to before me this~~~day of February, 1978.NOT Y PUBLIC HAZEL J.CARRICK Notary Public in tho Stato of Now YorR Qualified tn Onon.Co.No.4524460 My Commission spires March 30,19;gg (s~I 4
~(" ARVIN K.UPTON KUQKNK 8.THOMASl JR.LKONARO M, TROSTKN HARRY H.VOIQT LKX K.LARSON WAIIIINOTON PAATNCIIS 0 LAW OFFICKS OF LEBOEUF, LAMB,LElBY 8 MACRAE l787 N STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON,D.
C.2OOG6 Max'ch 12, 1974 ONC CHASK MANHATTAN O'ZA NCW YORKl N, Y, IOOOS WASHINGTON TCLCPNONC 202-872 8888 CASLC AOORCSS LALALUl WASHINGTON O.C Daniel M.Head, Esq.Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S.Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.20545 Re: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 AEC Docket No.50-410


==Dear Mr.Head:==
3 il I
During our conference call this morning wi'th counsel for all parties except the Environmental Defense Pund, I mentioned that Niagara Mohawk had one revision to the foxm of proposed construction permit which was distributed by the AEC Regulatory Staff on Pebruaxy 28, 1974.The Applicant's proposed change concerns the earliest and latest completion dates mentioned in paragraph 3.A.on page 3 of the proposed construction permit.Under the pxesent circumstances, Applicant believes and thereby requests that the earliest completion date be October 1, 1978 and the latest date for completion of the facility be April 1, 1980.We would appreciate having the Board revise the construction permit in this xespect.Very truly yours, T EBOEUP, IAMB, LEIBY Sc MACRAE cc: See page 2.(l E.B.Thomas,.Jr.Partner 0~~C~'(  
i" LEBoEUFI LAMB, LEIBY 8c tvtAGRAE                                                            22(I I757 N STREET, N.W.
~~S I 1~y cc: Dr.Narvin M.Mann Dr.William E.Martin Richard I.Goldsmith, Esq.Carmine J.Clemente, Esq.Mrs.Suzanne Weber Anthony Z.Roisman, Esq.Bernard M.Bordenick, Esp.Secretary, U.S.Atomic Energy Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board 0 E C'(I lt I'}}
WAsHINGTQN, D. C. 20036 TKLCPHONK 202 457  7500 CASLK ADDRK88 LEON A. ALLKNiJR.        CAMERON F. MAC RAK 4                                                                  RANDALL J. LtSOKVF,JR. I929 I975 JOSEPH E. BACHCLDER, II2  CAMCRON F. MACRACgxX 4      LCSWIN< WASHINGTONi 0 C.
ERNEST S. BALLARD.JR. GCRARD A. MAHCR                                                                            HORACE R. LAMB l934 I977 G. S. PCTER BERGEN 4      SHEILA H. MARSHALL              TCLKX: 440274 GCOFFRY D.C. BEST        JAMES G, McCLROY                                                                          ADRIAN C LKIBY I952 I975
                                                                                                                              ~
DAVID P. BICKS            JAMES P. McGRANERY, JR.i 4        TELECOPIER TAYLOR R. BRIGGS          PHILIP PALMER McGVIGAN CHARLES N.BURGER          HARVEY A.NAPIKR                  202 457 7543 THOMAS C.BURKE 04 JAMCS O'ALLEY,JR.4 ROGER D.FELDMANic        J MICHAEL PARISH
                            ~
CVGENE R. FIDELL          WILLIAMW. ROSEN BLATT JACOB FRIEDLANDCR        JOHN A.RUDY GCRARD GIORDANO          PAUL G. RUSSELL                                                                                  I40 DONALD J. GREENE          PATRICK J. SCOGNAMIGLIO                                                                              BROADWAY JAMES A. G REER,IZ 4      HAROLD M. SCIDEL JOHN L. GROSE 4          HALCYON G. SKINNER                                                                            NKW YORK,N.Y. I0005 DOUGLAS W. HAWCS          JOSEPH S.STRAUSS CARL D. HOBELMAN          SAMUEL M.SUGDKN                                                                            TELKPHONK 2I2  259 IIOO MICHAEL IOVCNKO          CUBE NC B. THOMAS. JR.~
JAM CS F. JOHNSON, 4'    I.EONARD M. TROSTEN    4                                                                      CABLE ADDRESS RONALD D. JONES i        HARRY H. VOIGT ic LCX K. LARSON 4          H RICHARD WACHTKL
                            ~                                                                                          LKBWIN> NKW YORK GRANT S. LCWIS            GCRARD P. WATSON K IM BA W. LOVEJOY        THOMAS A. 2ICRK                                                                                  TELEX: 4234IO RESIDENT PARTNERS WASHINGTON OFFICE 4 ADMITTCD TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR i.,0~3%
Mr. Edson G. Case                                                H I I +~
j3dl ~~II.:1 i lIIi4 Acting Director office of Nuclear Reactor                                                                7 Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cori;ssiOn Nashington, D.C.              20555 Re:      Niagara, mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mfle Poi'.nt Uni,t 2 Docket. No. 50-43.0.
 
==Dear Mr. Case:==
 
As    counsel      for Niagara            Mohawk Power                    Corporation, X enclose herewith an ori;ginal and 10 copies of a pleading entitled "Request foz Extension of Latest Completi.on Date."
Very truly yours, LEBOEUFq LAMBF LEXBY                            8(  MACRAE Eugen                    B. Thomas,          Jr.
Partner Attorneys for Niagara                              Mohawk Power Corpoxat.ion Enclosures
                                                                                                      , <>@<>000<
 
              \ I ~
m I
II f lp I
 
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of                    )
                                    )
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER  CORPORATION )                    Docket No. 50-410 (Nine Mile Point Unit 2)          )
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE Pursuant to Section 2.109 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and  Section 50.55(b) of the Commission's Regulations, Niagara  Mohawk Power  Corporation, holder of Construction Permit No. CPPR-112, hereby requests an extension of  its latest completion date for Nine Mile Point Unit 2. In support of such request, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows:
(1)  In the aforesaid construction permit, the latest completion date specified  is July 31, 1978. At this time, the project is  about 20 percent complete and cannot be finished  within the time specified in the construction permit; (2)  Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation requests  that the latest completion date in the construction permit be extended to December 31, 1984;
 
C      ~ ~
  ~
    ~ l
 
(3) In late  1973, the then President      of the United States publicly  announced  the seriousness    of the energy crisis confronting'the    United States.      Immediately thereafter  and  continuing to, this time, there has been. a  reduction in'the,.use of  electricity    and, consequently,    for  power demand  in Niagara    Mohawk Power  Corporation's service area.      Accordingly, the need for  this facility to    produce power has been postponed.
(4) Niagara Mohawk Power, Corporation, along with other P
privately  owned  public  utilities,    experienced  difficulty in obtaining,,  funds for, construction." at rates which were considered reasonable.      This lack of funds at reasonable rates has caused the, construction of the facility to    be delayed.
(5) In addition to the above, the following unanticipated causes  .for delay  have occurred during the      construction period.
Additional time is required,due to design changes,  such as  safety/relief valve piping relocation, required. to mitigate      Mark  II containment dynamic loads.        This area  is under Commission review, and    additional requirements may  result from that review.
 
~ ~
~ ~
Additiona1 time is required due to intensive study of geological features and phenomena as. reported, to the Commission in Niagara Mohawk Power    Corporation's  letter  dated December 13, 1976.
iii. Additional time  is required    due to  a change ,
from once-through to closed loop      circulating water cooling. This change, was reported to the Commission by  letter  dated July 19, 1976.
iv. Additional    time is required due to complete redesign of. electrical raceway systems and major structural changes in the Reactor Building, Control Building,      and cable tunnels to implement the Regulatory Guide 1.75 separation requirements.
: v. Additional time is required    due, to labor problems including work stoppages in      1976 and 1977.
vi. Additional    time is required  due  to shortage of qualified welders,  and  material procurement delays, such as for the primary containment liner.
 
~
  ~
 
vii. Additional  time is required  due  to  a  delay in the granting of the original Construction Permit which was not reflected    in the previously revised dates for earliest      and latest completion of the facility      (see Attachment 1).
viii. Additional time is required to implement        NRC requirements  for flood, protection of    ECCS pumps.
ix. Additional  time  is .required due  to the implementation of pipe whip protection require-ments  similar to those expressed in Regulatory Guide 1.46 which impacted the schedule        for completion of pipe stress analysis and liner fabric'ation.
xo  Additional time is required    due  to the imposition of" Regulatory Guide 1.89 requirements on Class IE Equipment Vendors which has resulted  in shortages of acceptable vendors.
 
t
~ ~
 
(6)    In Niagara.      Mohawk Power      Corporation's opinion, the requested action involves no            significant  hazards consideration;          good. cause.. has been, shown  for the delay; and the extension'f the latest completion date which has been, requested,.          is for  a reasonable period.
WHEREFORE,        Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation .requests            that the latest date. in.,Construction Permit                  No. CPPR-112 be. extended    until December 31, 1984.
Respectfully submitted, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION B
Gerald  . Rhode Vice President    -System  Project Management Subscribed and sworn to before me this~~~day of February, 1978.
NOT      Y PUBLIC HAZEL J. CARRICK Notary Public in tho Stato of Now YorR Qualified tn Onon. Co. No. 4524460 My Commission spires March 30,19;gg
 
(s
~ I 4
 
~ ("                                          LAW OFFICKS OF 0
LEBOEUF, LAMB,LElBY8 MACRAE l787 N STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON,D. C. 2OOG6 ARVIN K. UPTON                                                              ONC CHASK MANHATTAN O'ZA KUQKNK 8. THOMASl JR.                                                          NCW YORKl N, Y, IOOOS LKONARO M, TROSTKN                        Max'ch 12, 1974 HARRY H. VOIQT                                                                  WASHINGTON TCLCPNONC LKX K. LARSON                                                                      202-872 8888 WAIIIINOTON PAATNCIIS CASLC AOORCSS LALALUlWASHINGTON O. C Daniel      M. Head,  Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Re:     Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 AEC Docket No. 50-410
 
==Dear Mr. Head:==
 
During our conference call this morning wi'th counsel for all parties except the Environmental Defense Pund, I mentioned that Niagara Mohawk had one revision to the foxm of proposed construction permit which was distributed by the AEC Regulatory Staff on Pebruaxy 28, 1974.
The Applicant's proposed       change concerns the earliest and latest completion dates mentioned in paragraph 3.A. on page 3 of the proposed construction permit. Under the pxesent circumstances, Applicant believes and thereby requests that the earliest completion date be October 1, 1978 and the latest date for completion of the facility be April 1, 1980.
We would appreciate having the Board revise the construction permit in this xespect.
Very   truly yours, T EBOEUP,   IAMB, LEIBY Sc MACRAE
(
l E. B. Thomas, .Jr.
cc:      See page  2.                            Partner
 
          ~
0
        ~
C
  ~ '
(
 
  ~ ~
S I 1 ~
y cc: Dr. Narvin M. Mann Dr. William E. Martin Richard I . Goldsmith, Esq.
Carmine J. Clemente, Esq.
Mrs. Suzanne Weber Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Bernard M. Bordenick, Esp.
Secretary, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board
 
0 I
E C'
(
lt I'}}

Latest revision as of 04:36, 22 October 2019

Letter Enclosing a Pleading Entitled Request for Extension of Latest Completion Date.
ML18018A946
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/1978
From: Eric Thomas
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Case E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18018A946 (18)


Text

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

D1STRIBUT ION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-4i0 REC: CASF E 6 QRG: THOMAS E B DOCDATE: 02/27/78 NRC LEBOEUF LAMB LEIBY ET AL DATE RCVD: 02/27/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED: YES COPIES RECEIVED

SUBJECT:

LTR i ENCL i0 FQWARDING PLEADING ENTITLED: "REQUEST FOR EXTENSION QF LATEST COMPLETION DATE" i RE CONSTRUCTION CQMPLETIQN OF UNIT 2.

'LANT NAME: NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 'REVIEWER INITIAL: X JM DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL:

DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS REQUESTS FQR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)

(DISTRIBUTION CODE B006>

FQR ACTION: BR CHIEF VARGA++W/ENCL PROJ MGR KANE>+W/ENCL LIC ASST SERVICE4+W/ENCL FOR INFO: MQQR~t f/ENG REGAN~+W/ENCL FOR INFO: CL DUNCAN~~~W/ENCL INTERNAL: .G FILE~~~W/ENCL NRC PDR4~+W/ENCL I ~HF~NCL J MILLER~~W/ENCL T ABELL++W/ENCL EXTERNAL: LPDR S OSWEGO. NY4~<W/ENCL ACRS CAT 34H~W/ib ENCL DISTRIBUTlON: LTR 30 ENCL 30 CONTROL NBR: 780600004 SIZE: iP+5P+2P

%%%%%%+%%W%+%%%%%%%%+SHHI %%%%%%

if

".I +88%0l THE END

J't

~ g$ l ~

3 il I

i" LEBoEUFI LAMB, LEIBY 8c tvtAGRAE 22(I I757 N STREET, N.W.

WAsHINGTQN, D. C. 20036 TKLCPHONK 202 457 7500 CASLK ADDRK88 LEON A. ALLKNiJR. CAMERON F. MAC RAK 4 RANDALL J. LtSOKVF,JR. I929 I975 JOSEPH E. BACHCLDER, II2 CAMCRON F. MACRACgxX 4 LCSWIN< WASHINGTONi 0 C.

ERNEST S. BALLARD.JR. GCRARD A. MAHCR HORACE R. LAMB l934 I977 G. S. PCTER BERGEN 4 SHEILA H. MARSHALL TCLKX: 440274 GCOFFRY D.C. BEST JAMES G, McCLROY ADRIAN C LKIBY I952 I975

~

DAVID P. BICKS JAMES P. McGRANERY, JR.i 4 TELECOPIER TAYLOR R. BRIGGS PHILIP PALMER McGVIGAN CHARLES N.BURGER HARVEY A.NAPIKR 202 457 7543 THOMAS C.BURKE 04 JAMCS O'ALLEY,JR.4 ROGER D.FELDMANic J MICHAEL PARISH

~

CVGENE R. FIDELL WILLIAMW. ROSEN BLATT JACOB FRIEDLANDCR JOHN A.RUDY GCRARD GIORDANO PAUL G. RUSSELL I40 DONALD J. GREENE PATRICK J. SCOGNAMIGLIO BROADWAY JAMES A. G REER,IZ 4 HAROLD M. SCIDEL JOHN L. GROSE 4 HALCYON G. SKINNER NKW YORK,N.Y. I0005 DOUGLAS W. HAWCS JOSEPH S.STRAUSS CARL D. HOBELMAN SAMUEL M.SUGDKN TELKPHONK 2I2 259 IIOO MICHAEL IOVCNKO CUBE NC B. THOMAS. JR.~

JAM CS F. JOHNSON, 4' I.EONARD M. TROSTEN 4 CABLE ADDRESS RONALD D. JONES i HARRY H. VOIGT ic LCX K. LARSON 4 H RICHARD WACHTKL

~ LKBWIN> NKW YORK GRANT S. LCWIS GCRARD P. WATSON K IM BA W. LOVEJOY THOMAS A. 2ICRK TELEX: 4234IO RESIDENT PARTNERS WASHINGTON OFFICE 4 ADMITTCD TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR i.,0~3%

Mr. Edson G. Case H I I +~

j3dl ~~II.:1 i lIIi4 Acting Director office of Nuclear Reactor 7 Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cori;ssiOn Nashington, D.C. 20555 Re: Niagara, mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mfle Poi'.nt Uni,t 2 Docket. No. 50-43.0.

Dear Mr. Case:

As counsel for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, X enclose herewith an ori;ginal and 10 copies of a pleading entitled "Request foz Extension of Latest Completi.on Date."

Very truly yours, LEBOEUFq LAMBF LEXBY 8( MACRAE Eugen B. Thomas, Jr.

Partner Attorneys for Niagara Mohawk Power Corpoxat.ion Enclosures

, <>@<>000<

\ I ~

m I

II f lp I

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )

)

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION ) Docket No. 50-410 (Nine Mile Point Unit 2) )

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE Pursuant to Section 2.109 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Section 50.55(b) of the Commission's Regulations, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, holder of Construction Permit No. CPPR-112, hereby requests an extension of its latest completion date for Nine Mile Point Unit 2. In support of such request, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation states as follows:

(1) In the aforesaid construction permit, the latest completion date specified is July 31, 1978. At this time, the project is about 20 percent complete and cannot be finished within the time specified in the construction permit; (2) Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation requests that the latest completion date in the construction permit be extended to December 31, 1984;

C ~ ~

~

~ l

(3) In late 1973, the then President of the United States publicly announced the seriousness of the energy crisis confronting'the United States. Immediately thereafter and continuing to, this time, there has been. a reduction in'the,.use of electricity and, consequently, for power demand in Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's service area. Accordingly, the need for this facility to produce power has been postponed.

(4) Niagara Mohawk Power, Corporation, along with other P

privately owned public utilities, experienced difficulty in obtaining,, funds for, construction." at rates which were considered reasonable. This lack of funds at reasonable rates has caused the, construction of the facility to be delayed.

(5) In addition to the above, the following unanticipated causes .for delay have occurred during the construction period.

Additional time is required,due to design changes, such as safety/relief valve piping relocation, required. to mitigate Mark II containment dynamic loads. This area is under Commission review, and additional requirements may result from that review.

~ ~

~ ~

Additiona1 time is required due to intensive study of geological features and phenomena as. reported, to the Commission in Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's letter dated December 13, 1976.

iii. Additional time is required due to a change ,

from once-through to closed loop circulating water cooling. This change, was reported to the Commission by letter dated July 19, 1976.

iv. Additional time is required due to complete redesign of. electrical raceway systems and major structural changes in the Reactor Building, Control Building, and cable tunnels to implement the Regulatory Guide 1.75 separation requirements.

v. Additional time is required due, to labor problems including work stoppages in 1976 and 1977.

vi. Additional time is required due to shortage of qualified welders, and material procurement delays, such as for the primary containment liner.

~

~

vii. Additional time is required due to a delay in the granting of the original Construction Permit which was not reflected in the previously revised dates for earliest and latest completion of the facility (see Attachment 1).

viii. Additional time is required to implement NRC requirements for flood, protection of ECCS pumps.

ix. Additional time is .required due to the implementation of pipe whip protection require-ments similar to those expressed in Regulatory Guide 1.46 which impacted the schedule for completion of pipe stress analysis and liner fabric'ation.

xo Additional time is required due to the imposition of" Regulatory Guide 1.89 requirements on Class IE Equipment Vendors which has resulted in shortages of acceptable vendors.

t

~ ~

(6) In Niagara. Mohawk Power Corporation's opinion, the requested action involves no significant hazards consideration; good. cause.. has been, shown for the delay; and the extension'f the latest completion date which has been, requested,. is for a reasonable period.

WHEREFORE, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation .requests that the latest date. in.,Construction Permit No. CPPR-112 be. extended until December 31, 1984.

Respectfully submitted, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION B

Gerald . Rhode Vice President -System Project Management Subscribed and sworn to before me this~~~day of February, 1978.

NOT Y PUBLIC HAZEL J. CARRICK Notary Public in tho Stato of Now YorR Qualified tn Onon. Co. No. 4524460 My Commission spires March 30,19;gg

(s

~ I 4

~ (" LAW OFFICKS OF 0

LEBOEUF, LAMB,LElBY8 MACRAE l787 N STREET, N.W.

WASHINGTON,D. C. 2OOG6 ARVIN K. UPTON ONC CHASK MANHATTAN O'ZA KUQKNK 8. THOMASl JR. NCW YORKl N, Y, IOOOS LKONARO M, TROSTKN Max'ch 12, 1974 HARRY H. VOIQT WASHINGTON TCLCPNONC LKX K. LARSON 202-872 8888 WAIIIINOTON PAATNCIIS CASLC AOORCSS LALALUlWASHINGTON O. C Daniel M. Head, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 Re: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Unit 2 AEC Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Head:

During our conference call this morning wi'th counsel for all parties except the Environmental Defense Pund, I mentioned that Niagara Mohawk had one revision to the foxm of proposed construction permit which was distributed by the AEC Regulatory Staff on Pebruaxy 28, 1974.

The Applicant's proposed change concerns the earliest and latest completion dates mentioned in paragraph 3.A. on page 3 of the proposed construction permit. Under the pxesent circumstances, Applicant believes and thereby requests that the earliest completion date be October 1, 1978 and the latest date for completion of the facility be April 1, 1980.

We would appreciate having the Board revise the construction permit in this xespect.

Very truly yours, T EBOEUP, IAMB, LEIBY Sc MACRAE

(

l E. B. Thomas, .Jr.

cc: See page 2. Partner

~

0

~

C

~ '

(

~ ~

S I 1 ~

y cc: Dr. Narvin M. Mann Dr. William E. Martin Richard I . Goldsmith, Esq.

Carmine J. Clemente, Esq.

Mrs. Suzanne Weber Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Bernard M. Bordenick, Esp.

Secretary, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board

0 I

E C'

(

lt I'