ML071230745

Various Checklists for the Monticello Initial Examination - February 2007

ML071230745
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	05/03/2007
From:	Valos N NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML070660508	List: ML071230730 ML071230735 ML071230739 ML071230740 ML071230743 ML071230745 ML071230748 ML071230773
References
50-263/07-301
Download: ML071230745 (12)

Text

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE MONTICELLO INITIAL EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2007 ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 1 11 Facility: Monticello Date of Examination:

02/12 - 19/2007 Examinations Developed by: (Fd / NRC (circle one)

I -1 4 7 Chief Examiner's Initials 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l .j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >lo) applications audited to confirm qualifications

/ eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) Target Date* Task Description (Reference) 11 -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l .a; C.2.a and b) 11 -120 I 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) -1 20 3. 4. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 77& J -120 [-901 (5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] 31a J (-75) 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.l .e and f; C.3.d) (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l .e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

(-45) -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l .I; C.2.g; ES-202) 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.l .I; C.2.i; I[ --14 I ES-202) 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 11 -14 1 (C.2.h; C.3.f) -1 75. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by- case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[ADDlies only1 {Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.

Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT Commtffed to Nuclear NM~ Excellence - 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Pre-Examination (Review FP-TSAT-71, Attachment I for pre-job briefing requirements)

I nJAC ZL-r I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the so' 2/1t!o9 - ald*%s of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of this examination administration.

Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager facility management any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

examination scheduled for the date(s) of 1 Post-Examination To the best of my knowled e I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) of 2 11 2 - 2 114 7 d 3 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of this examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with their examination administration.

I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me. examinee until the completion of DATE DATE NOTE

//- 9-a 3 -/s -0: 3bk2 +age I of2

( 9F-1071-05 .ev. 0 (FP-T-SAT-71)

Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT commned to Nudenr NM~ Exceuence The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

NOTES: Page 2 of 2

( ( QF-1071-0, \ev. 0 (FP-T-SAT-71) Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT commnod to Nudo~rrErcWuhw NM~ The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-TSAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I d4k~ I ackn wledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the aoo7 iL'T A/ I 97 0 '7 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of this examination administration.

Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee.

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager facility management any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

'c examination scheduled for the date(s) of I 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date(s) ofJl42 4 2 administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

I o 7 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of this examination Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until the completion of their examination administration.

I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination andlor enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

1. Pte-ExarrrSnarton

~KWIWV rr-i wmi -I ., ---.... __ for prejob briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have aquired specialized knowledge about the 2 DO 7 IhAJa 7 as of !he dale of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboul these exaniinalions to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor.

I understand ha\ I am no! lo instruct, evaluale, or provide performance feedback to !hose individuals scheduled to be administered Ihese examinations from this dale until comptetion of examination administration.

Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do nol select Ihe training content or provide direct or inchrect feedback lo an examinee.

Furthermre, I an aware uf the physical secunty measures and requirements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the condilions d thts agreernenl may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor ZYI errforcement adion againsl my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indicztions or suggeslions that exarninalion security may have been compromised.

examinalionts) scheduled for the dale(s) of 2. PostSmlnatlon To the best of administmtion, I did mot insbuct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered these examindions.

e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examhalions administered during I 0 '? . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the complelion of examinalron

1. 2 3 4 5 6. 7. 8. DATE gGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 3 ot

\ QF-1071-0\, .ev. 0 (FP-T-SAT-71) Nuclear Management Company MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT CMI- lo Nudear NMC) Excdlmcs The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-TSAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired speciatized knowledge about the 2 OD '/ 'I L-T &11a/o 7 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration.

Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. examination@) scheduled for the date@)

of 2. Post-Examination To the best of m knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the date(s) of A- zl\c:loq administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered these examinations. . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the Completion of examination

( ( QF-1071-0-1

.\ev. 0 (FP-T-SAT-71) Nuclear Management Company MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

Page 2 of 2

Tier I Grow 1 I1 21 1 21 1 211 G G G G G G 211 212 211 21 1 1 12 1 I1 111 211 212 212 112 111 1 I1 Selected Randomlyl WA Reason for Rejection 21 1000 K2.03

~2.5 IR 209001 K.05 ~2.5 IR 223002 No K2 290003 No K5 2.1.5 ~2.5 IR 2.1.3 ~2.5 IR 2.2.9 ~2.5 IR 2.1.7 2.3.5 ~2.5 IR 2.3.6 ~2.5 IR Not suitable for written exam Al.02 rejected as no UPS MG exist at MNGP, no other A1 were >2.5, reselected A2.01. Reselected A3.01 vice A3.08 as no suitable question could be written. Reselected Al.07 vice Al.01 as the first selection topic was too close to first in this system (system was a double selection).

262002 245000 261 000 223002 Reselected 1.1 1 vice 1.08 as this was too close to exam question

2. I Reselected 295014 as could not write a valid SRO question from previous selection.

295002 ~ 295001 600000 21 5003 272000 Reselected AA2.05 as original was too close to RO exam question Reselected 2.4.46 as could not write a valid question from 2.1.7. Reselected 400000 to enable writing of a valid SRO question. Reselected K1.09 to be able to write a valid RO question.

272000 I Reselected 2.2.1 1 to be able to write a valid SRO question. Reselected 295033 as generic WA selection made question similar to SRO question 80. 29501 7 Reselected generic 2.1 .I 1 vice 2.4.14 to facilitate writing an appropriate question.

295026 295001 Reselected WA to facilitate writing an SRO level question. Selected WA 295025 295001 Reselected WA to facilitate writing an SRO level question. Selected WA 295025 ES-401, Page 27 of 33 ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Monticello Date of Exam: February 19,2007 Exam LeveflTGl SRC Item Description

1. 2. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented I1 3. 4. 5. 6. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check

> 25% of examinations) Grading for all borderline cases (80 &Yo overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4Y0 on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameKignature

/I a. Grader ~ Initials I I Date 3LZbF E3Qc I b4 9 b. Reviewer(*) c. NRC Chief Examiner

(*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) 3 jsb 7 (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Rev.

9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Monticello Date of Exam: February 19,2007 Exam Level: RO /a item Description

~ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check

> 25% of examinations) Grading for all borderline cases (80 QYo overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, k4Y0 on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameKignature Initials -k C Date (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.