ML15244A318: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* the malfunction(s) that are ent ered to initiate the event tJ' rJ/;I | * the malfunction(s) that are ent ered to initiate the event tJ' rJ/;I | ||
* the s ymptom s/cues that will be visible to the c rew w., . the expected opera tor actions (by s hift pos iti on) | * the s ymptom s/cues that will be visible to the c rew w., . the expected opera tor actions (by s hift pos iti on) | ||
* the e vent termination point (i f applicable) | * the e vent termination point (i f applicable) | ||
: 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario " r "'J,o.. without a cre dible preceding incident such as a seismic event. C-PJ 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. rJ/A c.p., 6. Sequencing and t iming of events is reasonable , and allows the examination team to obtain rJ /,A aJ; comp let e eva lu ation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 7. If time compression techniques are used , the scenario summary cl ea rly so indicates. Op erators have suffic i ent time t o carry out expected activit i es without undue time cons trai nts. rJ/p. Cues are given. 8. The simu l ator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator Y t I perform ance deficien c ies or deviation s from the referenced plant h a ve been evaluated tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained whil e runnin g the pl anned s cenario s. " t I 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new o r sig n ificantly mod ifi ed scenario. f'I If. All other scenarios have been alte r ed in accordance with Sect i on D.5 of ES-301. 11. All individ ual operator competencies can be evaluated , as verified using Form ES-301-6 rJ/A (submit the form along w i th the s imul ator scenarios). | : 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario " r "'J,o.. without a cre dible preceding incident such as a seismic event. C-PJ 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. rJ/A c.p., 6. Sequencing and t iming of events is reasonable , and allows the examination team to obtain rJ /,A aJ; comp let e eva lu ation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 7. If time compression techniques are used , the scenario summary cl ea rly so indicates. Op erators have suffic i ent time t o carry out expected activit i es without undue time cons trai nts. rJ/p. Cues are given. 8. The simu l ator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator Y t I perform ance deficien c ies or deviation s from the referenced plant h a ve been evaluated tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained whil e runnin g the pl anned s cenario s. " t I 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new o r sig n ificantly mod ifi ed scenario. f'I If. All other scenarios have been alte r ed in accordance with Sect i on D.5 of ES-301. 11. All individ ual operator competencies can be evaluated , as verified using Form ES-301-6 rJ/A (submit the form along w i th the s imul ator scenarios). | ||
Vt>-] 12. Each appl i cant will be s i gnificantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eve nt s "'/I\ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the si mul ator scenarios). | Vt>-] 12. Each appl i cant will be s i gnificantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eve nt s "'/I\ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the si mul ator scenarios). | ||
"' 13. The lev e l of diffi c ul ty is appropriate to sup port licensing decisio n s for each c r e w position. t'9" r'/A (#", I Targe t Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes | "' 13. The lev e l of diffi c ul ty is appropriate to sup port licensing decisio n s for each c r e w position. t'9" r'/A (#", I Targe t Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes | ||
------1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f 9-"'/,A WJ ;l.. I I \ 'Y9--r' '4 I 2. Malfunctions after EOP en try (1-2) I Ctr/ 3. Abnormal e vent s (2-4) 3 I 5 I .;}. r'fA 4. Major tran s ients (1-2) I I I I I w tJ/A L. 5. EOPs e ntered/requir i ng substantive actions (1-2) i I I I ;).. Y o---rl IA , J. 6. E OP co ntingencies requiring substantive ac ti ons (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr J_ ,.t ' 7. Cr iti ca l tasks (2-3) C!tW"t I}} | ------1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f 9-"'/,A WJ ;l.. I I \ 'Y9--r' '4 I 2. Malfunctions after EOP en try (1-2) I Ctr/ 3. Abnormal e vent s (2-4) 3 I 5 I .;}. r'fA 4. Major tran s ients (1-2) I I I I I w tJ/A L. 5. EOPs e ntered/requir i ng substantive actions (1-2) i I I I ;).. Y o---rl IA , J. 6. E OP co ntingencies requiring substantive ac ti ons (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr J_ ,.t ' 7. Cr iti ca l tasks (2-3) C!tW"t I}} | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 27 April 2019
| ML15244A318 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/2015 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | NextEra Energy Duane Arnold |
| Zoia, C D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15118A364 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML15244A318 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist form II Facility: Duane Arnold Energy Center Date of Exam: 4/6/15-4/17/15 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I:, Operating Test No.: 20 15301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c# 1. The initial conditions a re realistic , in that some equipment and/or ins tru menta ti on may be out of se rvi ce, but it does not c ue the operators into expec ted events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. rJ/A C41/ 3. E ach event description consists of . the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
- the malfunction(s) that are ent ered to initiate the event tJ' rJ/;I
- the s ymptom s/cues that will be visible to the c rew w., . the expected opera tor actions (by s hift pos iti on)
- the e vent termination point (i f applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario " r "'J,o.. without a cre dible preceding incident such as a seismic event. C-PJ 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. rJ/A c.p., 6. Sequencing and t iming of events is reasonable , and allows the examination team to obtain rJ /,A aJ; comp let e eva lu ation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 7. If time compression techniques are used , the scenario summary cl ea rly so indicates. Op erators have suffic i ent time t o carry out expected activit i es without undue time cons trai nts. rJ/p. Cues are given. 8. The simu l ator modeling is not altered. Jr!)/ "'/,o. c., 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator Y t I perform ance deficien c ies or deviation s from the referenced plant h a ve been evaluated tJ/A to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained whil e runnin g the pl anned s cenario s. " t I 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new o r sig n ificantly mod ifi ed scenario. f'I If. All other scenarios have been alte r ed in accordance with Sect i on D.5 of ES-301. 11. All individ ual operator competencies can be evaluated , as verified using Form ES-301-6 rJ/A (submit the form along w i th the s imul ator scenarios).
Vt>-] 12. Each appl i cant will be s i gnificantly involved in the minimum number of transients and eve nt s "'/I\ specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the si mul ator scenarios).
"' 13. The lev e l of diffi c ul ty is appropriate to sup port licensing decisio n s for each c r e w position. t'9" r'/A (#", I Targe t Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
1. Total malfunctions (5-8) b ,5,5 'f 9-"'/,A WJ ;l.. I I \ 'Y9--r' '4 I 2. Malfunctions after EOP en try (1-2) I Ctr/ 3. Abnormal e vent s (2-4) 3 I 5 I .;}. r'fA 4. Major tran s ients (1-2) I I I I I w tJ/A L. 5. EOPs e ntered/requir i ng substantive actions (1-2) i I I I ;).. Y o---rl IA , J. 6. E OP co ntingencies requiring substantive ac ti ons (0-2) I I I I I 'Fr J_ ,.t ' 7. Cr iti ca l tasks (2-3) C!tW"t I