ML17097A562: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[ULNRC-06349, Callaway, Unit 1 - Enclosure 3 to ULNRC-06349 - Document A22-1690-001, Rev. 0, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Callaway Energy Center, Section 5, Page 3 of 6 - Appendix C, Page 3 of 10]]
{{Adams
| number = ML17097A562
| issue date = 03/16/2015
| title = Enclosure 3 to ULNRC-06349 - Document A22-1690-001, Rev. 0, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Callaway Energy Center, Section 5, Page 3 of 6 - Appendix C, Page 3 of 10
| author name =
| author affiliation = TLG Services, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = Ameren Missouri, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000483
| license number = NPF-030
| contact person =
| case reference number = ULNRC-06349
| document report number = A22-1690-001, Rev. 0
| package number = ML17097A555
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 26
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ULNRC-06349  Page 75 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5, Page 3 of 6 FIGURE 5.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSITION EnergySolutions Cute, Utah Oak Ridge, TN TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 76 of 173 CaUaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document M2-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5, Page 4 of 6 FIGURE 5.2 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE DESTINATIONS RADIOLOGICAL TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 77 of 173 Catlaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 5 of C TABLE 5.1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Waste Volume Mass V,.,......c L ic*feet)ounds)Low-Level Rathoactive ESitjA 176 272 14,265249 Waste(near-surface disposal)wcs B 1,750 191,469 wc$_____C 393 47,411 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel tcpcP_9)qyp_GTçC 22L7 43?P ProcessedfConthtioned Recycling Vendors A 286,787 10,788,070 2725,38O Eli Waste is classified accorthng to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 t2]Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 78 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Anaiysis Document A224690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5,Page CofC TABLE 5.2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
 
==SUMMARY==
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (near-surface disposal)EnervSolutions WC$Wes A B C 148.204 501 406 11,859,238 50254 46,747 Waste Volume Mass----ic..ProcessedlConthtioned Recycling i:ccgccpjc!L
......Totals[21 464,594 24,309,290 Greater than Class C (geologic repository)
Spent Fuel Equivalent GTCC 2,217 433,180[11 Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[2]Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349 Page 79 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 1 of 5 6.RESULTS The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Callaway relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis prepared in 2011.While not an engineering study, the estimates provide the plant owner with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.
The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the station's spent fuel pooi for a minimum of five and on-half years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.
Once sufficiently cooled, the assemblies will be moved to the I$F$I for interim storage and to await transfer to a DOE facility (e.g., geologic repository).
The cost projected to promptly decommission (DECON)Callaway, assuming a 40-year operating life and the use of off-site low-level radioactive waste processing to reduce the volume requiring controlled disposal, is estimated to be$836.6 million.The majority of this cost (approximately 82.8%)is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the operating license can be terminated.
Another 3.5%is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel.The remaining 13.7%is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.The cost projected for deferred decommissioning (SAF$TOR), assuming a 40-year operating life and the use of off-site low-level radioactive waste processing to reduce the volume requiring controlled disposal, is estimated to be$1,091.8 million.The majority of this cost (approximately 81.3%)is associated with placing the unit in storage, ongoing caretaking of the unit during dormancy, and the eventual physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the operating license can be terminated.
Another 8.2%is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel.The remaining 10.5%is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 and 6.2, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost.The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program.It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that Ameren Missouri will oversee the TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 80 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 2 of 5 decommissioning program, using a DOC to manage the decommissioning labor force and the associated subcontractors.
The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.
However, once the operating license is terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site (for the DECON alternative).
As described in this report, the spent fuel pooi will remain operational for a minimum of five and one-half years following the cessation of operations.
The pool will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created.This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area.Over the five and one-half year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into multi-purpose canisters and transferred to the I$F$I.The I$F$I will continue to operate until such time that the transfer of spent fuel to a DOE facility is complete.The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste.As described in Section 5, disposition of the low-level radioactive material required controlled disposal is at the Energy$olutions' facility.Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment (GTCC), are packaged for geologic disposal.The cost of geologic thsposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility.Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction.
The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities.
The cost identified in the summary tables for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon prevailing union wages.Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process.The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage.With a work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license.Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 81 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 3 of 5 can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report.For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.Decontamination is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure.Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ.Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear unit.License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency.This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings.The status of any plant components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance.
While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349 Page 82 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 4 of 5 TABLE 6.1 DECON ALTERNATWE 40-YEAR PLANT OPERATING LIFE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2014 dollars)zzzEzz::::
ntjZ Decontamination 18,461 2.2 Removai-173,424J 20.7-Transportation____________________
15,934j1.9
--------OffsiteWastePrpçss 25,790 3.1 3O7O4 3EL2-----__?_CoiporateAllocations 9273 1.1 Spent Fue1Management[]
29,564J 3.5[Insurance
çgyç_--------I----Characterization andLicensingSurveys 2424 2?2pcy9!Q?9llJc-------,-6,956 OS Total[31 836,582 100 cp_JI__T2L_j License Termination 692,622j 82.8 2964_?:-Site Restoration 1 14396J 13.7 Total[3]836,5821 100[1]Includes engineering costs[21 Direct costs only.Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/spent fuel pooi O&M and Emergency Planning fees[3]Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 83 of 173 Cuflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 6, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 6.2$AF$TOR ALTERNATIVE 40-YEAR PLANT OPERATING LIFE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2014 dollars)CostElement T otal Percentage Decontamination 16,533 1.5 Removal 174,946 16.0.------Transportation 13, 139 1.2 w.-....'Th%Off-site Waste Processing 28,471 2.6 1,_gp1.,,..,.,,..--Security 155,033 14.2 CopateAllocations 9,891 O pIfpI1t icm ,___--.J4_[21""z i_cq Fees 6.7-----,---ChnzationandUSmes 24,327 22?9pcyT.-2qpca.--21,784 2.0 Total[3]1,091,753 100 PerçLicense Termination 887, 947 81.3 SpentFue1Mangçit 89388 8.2 Site Restoration 1 14,417 10.5 Total[3]1,091,753 100[1]Includes engineering costs[2]Direct costs only.Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/spent fuel pooi O&M and Emergency Planning fees[3]Columns may not add due to rounding (41 Includes percentage of Period 2a (dormancy) plant operating costs until spent fuel pool is emptied, in addition to the direct costs.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 84 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis.Section 7, Page 1 of 3 7.REFERENCES 1."Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Callaway Energy Center,"Document No.A22-1644-OO1, Rev.0, TLG Services, Inc., August 2014 2.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72,'General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities,"
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 53 Fed.Reg., 24018-, June 27, 1988 3.U.s.Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159,"Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"
Rev.2, October 2011 4.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E,"Radiological Criteria for License Termination" 5.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50,"Entombment Options for Power Reactors,"
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 66 Fed.Reg.52551, October 16, 2001 6.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50 and 51,"Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,"
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 61 Fed.Reg.39278, July 29, 1996 7."Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments,"
U.S.Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982 8.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50,"Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,"
Subpart 54 (bb),"Conditions of Licenses"9."Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act,"Public Law 96-573, 1980 10."Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985,"Public Law 99-240, 1986 11.Waste is classified in accordance with U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10,Part6l.55 12.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, Final Rule,"Radiological Criteria for License Termination,"
62 Fed.Reg.39058, July 21, 1997 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 85 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 2 of 3 7.REFERENCES (continued) 13."Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination,"
EPA Memorandum OSWER No.9200.4-18, August 22, 1997 14.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16,"Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made rathonucides in community water systems"15."Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites,"OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002 16."Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM),"
NUREG/CR-1575, Rev.1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev.1, August 2000 17.T.S.LaGuardia et al.,"Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"
MF/NESP-036, May 1986 18.W.J.Manion and T.S.LaGuardia,"Decommissioning Handbook,"
U.S.Department ofEnergy, DOEIEV/10128-1, November 1980 19."Building Construction Cost Data 2014,"Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Massachusetts 20.Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p.239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984 21.U.S.Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,"Transportation,"
Parts 173 through 178 22.Tn-State Motor Transit Company, Radioactive Materials Tariff 23.J.C.Evans et al.,"Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 1984 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 86 of 773 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 3 of 3 7.REFERENCES (continued) 24.Ri.Smith, G.J.Konzek, W.E.Kennedy, Jr.,"Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station,"NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1978 25.H.D.Oak, et at,"Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station,"NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1980 26.SECY-00-0145,"Integrated Rulemaking Plan for Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning,"
June 2000 27."Microsoft Project Professional 2010,"Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 28.cAtomic Energy Act of 1954,"(68 Stat.919)TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 87 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 1 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 88 of 173 Caltaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis AppendixA, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example: Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger<3,000 lbs.1.SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing<3,000 lbs.will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist.They wifi be thsconnected from the inlet and outlet piping.The heat exchanger wifi be sent to the waste processing area.2.CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes)(minutes)*
a Remove insulation 60 (b)b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 C Install contamination controls 20 (b)d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e Cap openings 20 (d)f Rig for removal 30 30 g Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h Remove contamination controls 15 15 i Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):-F Respiratory protection adjustment (50%of critical duration)128+RathationJALARA adjustment (37%of critical duration)95 Adjusted work duration 478+Protective clothing adjustment (30%of adjusted duration)143 Productive work duration 621+Work break adjustment (8.33%ofproductive duration)Total work duration (minutes)673***Total duration=11.217 hr****alpha designators inthcate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 89 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 AppendixA, Page 3 of 4 3.LABOR REQUIRED APPENDIX A (continued)
Laborers Craftsmen Foreman General Foreman Fire Watch Health Physics Technician Total Labor Cost Crew Number 3.00 11.217$39.47$1,328.21 2.00 11.217$54.57$1,224.22 1.00 11.217$56.98$639.14 0.25 11.217$57.98$162.59 0.05 11.217$39.47$22.14 1.00 11.217$48.84$547.84$3,924.14 4.EQUIPMENT&CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs none Consumables[Materials Costs.Universal Polypropylene Sorbent 50@$0.60/sq ft['1.Tarpaulin, oil resistant, fire retardant 50@$0.27/sq ft[2].Gas torch consumables 1@$18.85 x 1[hr[3]Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead&profit on equipment and materials@14.233/4Total costs, equipment&material TOTAL COST:$30.00$13.50$18.85$62.35$8.87$71.22 Removal ofcontaminated heat exchanger<3000 pounds:$3,995.36 Duration (hours)Rate ($/hr)Cost Total labor cost: Total equipment/material costs: Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:$3,924.14$71.22 81.88 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349 Enc'osure 3 Page 90 of 173 Callaway Energy Center*Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev 0 Decommissioning CostAnalysis AppendixA, Page 4 of 4 5.NOTES AND REFERENCES
.Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI)program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the"Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"
MFINESP-036, May 1986..References for equipment&consumables costs: 1.www.mcmaster.com online catalog, McMaster Carr Spifi Control (7193T88)2.R.$.Means (2014)Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0600, page 23 3.R.S.Means (2014)Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, page 698.Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Columbia, Missouri.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page9l of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 1 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 92 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 2 off APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing,$flinear foot 0.44 Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter,$/]inear foot 4.68 Removal of clean pipe>2 to 4 inches diameter,$fhnear foot 6.72 Removal of clean pipe>4 to 8 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 13.28 Removal of clean pipe>8 to 14 inches diameter,$/linear foot 25.46 Removal of clean pipe>14 to 20 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 33.20 Removal of clean pipe>20 to 36 inches diameter,$fhnear foot 48.82 Removal of clean pipe>36 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 57.96 Removal of clean valve>2 to 4 inches 87.48 Removal of clean valve>4 to 8 inches 132.77 Removal of clean valve>8 to 14 inches 254.61 Removal of clean valve>14 to 20 inches 331.95 Removal of clean valve>20 to 36 inches 488.18 Removal of clean valve>36 inches 579.62 Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping 31.06 Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping 107.87 Removal of clean pump,<300 pound 225.92 Removal ofclean pump, 300-1000 pound 627.83 Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound 2,464.05 Removal ofclean pump,>10,000 pound 4,772.28 Removal ofclean pump motor, 300-1000 pound 261.20 Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 1,021.98 Removal of clean pump motor,>10,000 pound 2,299.43 Removal of clean heat exchanger<3000 pound 1,325.75 Removal of clean heat exchanger>3000 pound 3,346.84 Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator 9,416.15 Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater 19,332.45 Removal of clean tank,<300 gallons 290.37 Removal ofclean tank, 300-3000 gallon 911.88 Removal of clean tank,>3000 gallons,$fsquare foot surface area 7.73 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 93 01173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis , Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal ofclean electrical equipment,<300 pound 12L36 Removal ofclean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 425.26 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound$50.50 Removal of clean electrical equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean electrical transformer
<30 tons 1,406.01 Removal of clean electrical transformer
>30 tons 4,049.05 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator,<100 kW 1,436.12 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW 3,205.50 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator,>1 MW 6,636.04 Removal of clean electrical cable tray,$[linear foot 11.49 Removal of clean electrical conduit,$/linear foot 5.02 Removal of clean mechanical equipment,<300 pound 121.36 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 425.26 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 850.50 Removal ofclean mechanical equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean HVAC equipment,<300 pound 146.73 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 510.98 Removal ofclean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,018.38 Removal of clean HVAC equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean HVAC ductwork,$/pound 0.46 Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing,$flinear foot lAO Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter,$/linear foot 19.82 Removal of contaminated pipe>2 to 4 inches thameter,$Ilinear foot 33.76 Removal of contaminated pipe>4 to 8 inches diameter,$/linear foot 53.92 Removal of contaminated pipe>8 to 14 inches diameter,$/linear foot 105.29 Removal of contaminated pipe>14 to 20 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 126.41 Removal of contaminated pipe>20 to 36 inches diameter,$flinear foot 174.60 Removal of contaminated pipe>36 inches diameter,$flinear foot 206.16 Removal of contaminated valve>2 to 4 inches 408.26 Removal of contaminated valve>4 to 8 inches 492.14 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 94 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 4 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)
Removal of contaminated valve>8 to 14 inches 1,003.18 Removal of contaminated valve>14 to 20 inches 1,274.87 Removal of contaminated valve>20 to 36 inches 1,696.32 Removal of contaminated valve>36 inches 2,011.92 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 133.15 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping 429.69 Removal of contaminated pump,<300 pound 880.15 Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound 2,040.83 Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound 6,586.89 Removal of contaminated pump,>10,000 pound 16,045.88 Removal ofcontaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound 871.81 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 2,684.52 Removal of contaminated pump motor,>10,000 pound 6,027.15 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger<3000 pound 3,995.36 Removal ofcontaminated heat exchanger>3000 pound 11,602.53 Removal of contaminated tank,<300 gallons 1,463.53 Removal of contaminated tank,>300 gallons,$/square foot 28.55 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment,<300 pound 676.59 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,648.52 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,174.61 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray,$flinear foot 32.80 Removal of contaminated electrical conduit,$/linear foot 15.65 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment,<300 pound 752.92 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,821.37 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,501.80 Removal ofcontaminated mechanical equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment,<300 pound 752.92 Removal ofcontaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,821.37 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,501.80 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 95 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 5 off APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost[Unit($)
Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork,$/pound 2.03 Removallplasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components,$Ilinear in.3.60 Additional decontamination of surface by washing,$/square foot 7.49 Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing,$/square foot 33.00 Decontamination rig hook up and flush,$1 250 foot length 6,364.45 Chemical flush of components/systems,$/gallon 18.79 Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete,$/cubic yard 137.19 Removal of grade slab concrete,$/cubic yard 179.99 Removal of clean concrete floors,$/cubic yard 363.14 Removal of sections of clean concrete floors,$/cubic yard 1,067.34 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar,$/cubic yard 236.89 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar,$/cubic yard 2,056.55 Removal ofclean heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar,$/cubic yard 299.52 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar,$/cubic yard 2,721.03 Removal heavily rein concrete wiWl8 rebar&steel embedments,$/cubic yard 443.64 Removal of below-grade suspended floors,$/cubic yard 363.14 Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures,$/cubic yard 878.26 Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures,$/cubic yard 2,049.51 Removal of clean foundation concrete,$/cubic yard 692.34 Removal of contaminated foundation concrete,$/cubic yard 1,910.04 Explosive demolition ofbuik concrete,$/cubic yard 30.64 Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 96.38 Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall,$tcubic yard 319.77 Removal of clean solid masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 96.38 Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 319.77 Backfill of below-grade voids,$/cubic yard 32.65 Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids,$/linear foot 111.87 Placement ofconcrete for below-grade voids,$/cubic yard 123.61 Excavation of clean material,$/cubic yard 3.21 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349 Enc'osure 3 Page 96 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 6 ofT APPENINX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Excavation of contaminated material,$/cubic yard 41.60 Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included),$/cubic yard 24.61 Removal of contaminated concrete rubble,$/cubic yard 26.65 Removal of building by volume,$/cubic foot 0.31 Removal of clean building metal siding,$/square foot 1.26 Removal of contaminated building metal siding,$/square foot 4.25 Removal of standard asphalt roofing,$/square foot 2.06 Removal of transite panels,$/square foot 2.04 Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill&spall),$/square foot 12.24$cabbling contaminated concrete floors,$/square foot 7.42 Scabbling contaminated concrete walls,$/square foot 19.52 Scabbling contaminated ceilings,$/square foot 66.90 Scabbling structural steel,$/square foot 5.97 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail
<10 ton capacity 599.12 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail
<10 ton capacity 1,702.27 Removal ofclean overhead crane/monorail
>10-50 ton capacity 1,437.91 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail
>10-50 ton capacity 4,084.75 Removal ofpolar crane>50 ton capacity 6,008.31 Removal of gantry crane>50 ton capacity 25,306.61 Removal of structural steel,$/pound 0.19 Removal of clean steel floor grating,$/square foot 4.46 Removal of contaminated steel floor grating,$/square foot 12.92 Removal of clean free standing steel liner,$/square foot 11.59 Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner,$/square foot 33.35 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner,$/square foot 5.80 Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner,$/square foot 38.89 Placement of scaffolding in clean areas,$/square foot 14.74 Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas,$/square foot 24.14 Landscaping with topsoil,$/acre 24,007.77 Cost of CPC B-88 L$A box&preparation for use 1,999.95 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 97 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A224690-OO1, Rev.0 Appendix B, Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)
Cost of CPC B-25 L$A box&preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box&preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 L$A box&preparation for use Cost of L$A drum&preparation for use Cost of cask liner for CN$1 8 120A cask (resins)Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (filters)8,546.72 Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming,$/square foot 0.77 1,827.70 1,485.94 10,282.72 192.76 11,931.47 TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Page 98 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix C, Page 1 of 10 APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON ALTERNATWE DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE 40-YEAR OPERATING LIFE with LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTiVE WASTE PROCESSING
.TLG Services, Inc.
ULNRC-06349  Pageggot 173 CtluyE,y DmmiuinngCo#tAntyaia Rv.0 10 Table C Callaway Energy Center DECON Alternative Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40-Year Operating Life with Low-Level Radioactive Waste Processing (thanasads ar2ald dallam)I'ERlOl)1&-th.th I'(,d(,d 1 1)&#xfc;t Atl 1..I.I P 1.1.2 Ni5ta I..I.a I.t.4 Ntsa JPnamc orcIiag i.t.5 1.Lb P kljt P5J)45.1.7 I&;a.1..1.s Pt)(a.(i)(h-Ctn()y I.tj, 1.t.1o 1..1.11 D)t.ikdby.pmIad iam5ay I..I.I2 I*.l.I3 T5EIt.,IEA 1.I.J3 5is5pdIkCat 5tady 1.I.I5 T&#xfc;ti*II b.Ll(;NRC sftanaiatipha ttaLy Sfisti..1.I7.l 1i.I7.1 Icytn 1.1.17.3 N5S5I)ei.tieFhah 1.I.I7.4 1.I.17l 1..))7fi 1.I.I7.7 S5.a 1.1.17.0 I.17.U M.a Tb&#xfc;, II.I7.1U Mi 1.I.17.l I n*cta S I.I.I7i2 C5(C I.LI7.t3 PdIiCy&it,t 1.I.17 T4L Haiw&5it PwIim 1..I.1H I.L1f Pi&a&1i.25 Dca tn dc-p J*.I.21 RiggagICo..
1.I.22 SbtAIIi)dd I.Atiicy Ct P&!id I I*.a.1 SF4T,..%t I.3 Sb*lP(d)f ICIIC id I.PIDqdtCs 1.4.3 H.Ith phyi ppIi 14.1 I.45)iisIfbAW m"''1 Ia4,fi McweIadc b.4.7 N1LCF h.48 I.4J INPOF b 4 0 Sp Fn)I I 0111 1*4 11 I5FSt0pmi, Cau l.1.I1 (tMk*ijm 11.4.13 Sm11y Suff0at 1&4.13 Uttily&ffCt b.4 5,bu,s.I P,*j1 I)M TOTAL tERIOI)b COST AtMty Jadaa J)aa Hm'I P*kla T,aaspn 1'mJsg I)hp.*I Oth TI T.tI M*a**at V*Iaaa CIa.t VIacsHC1itiC 01CC C.ft C.t Cat Cat C.as C.atI c Ct ta.Fast Cu.Feat Cu.Feat ('a.Fmt C'..F SV.I.h.Mahm...513 25 15)es 51$.-11110 57 667 117 ,--120 15 45 ItS*-125'!145---V te 95 7o iTt--, 7147 77 554 594----63 9 4 771--.9!15 133 10.10 1.0110--202 110 132 Ill..-50 0 so-.-584 57 Gfl 17117-.-113 17 131 55.-.$4.770 715 7405.1,5110.-.1011 45 315 145 ,...3000 400 3,155 1,150..-177 11(1 103 207--.-2700 4.15 2.1145 21715----155 211 178 175 , It------55.-.*-655-..-I,&...-----2550 432 1,312'1,1112*--.-3151-, li00-, 75151--711151.: 4,1117 ,.5151 ,.7.1151-*1.5151-.500 , , 3.120-.4,1451.1,4151-2311..275,7114-.123.10(1 12.575)211 11171714 12,1715 2*772457-.-, 1.10(2 ,-*.250-,, 1,677'.1,151-.--(4715..-791.,--11,224.-41.158 TLG Seruicca, las.B 75 102 102 115 1.279 209 (00 1100 1,100 12054 2,1515 12,1015 4,7171 31,177 51,177 7134 1711(33 57 475.1,020 0 3.7(1 65,7)13 10251 50,235 7111110.-610 9(0-.-.2,655.1110.'
ULNRC-06349 Enck3sure 3 Page 10001173 Drnrni*.iosing Co.tAnatyai.
Table C Callaway Energy Center DECON Alternative Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40-Year Operating Life witb Low-Level Radioactive Waste Processing (theosasda ef2514 dollars)Doesoost A22-1cs.-*ei Rr.I Apprsdlo C Page Soul A(oIo5y I)oooo Romoal Psokagls Traasp.rt I'rooesss I)Loposal (Ohor T.ds Ts(aI lieTons M.osieaess Rosr.t.a Voicer CIost C)oNB (OaasC UflC I'roosoed Croft C.,oaor Isdm io1isky I)osodpflao Usot Csst Coos Coos Casts Casts Celo Cadilogosey Uses Casts Coslo Casio Ca.Foot Us.Pose Cu iesi (u.Foot Cn.P.e: Wi., the.Moshooro Moshooro JERIQI)Ih I)oo.amisolmiog Proparsso Pono lb Diestltoomoissiodng AimnUo)oodoLW.k Prooloos.Ih.1.t.I PIa*e coMes th.t.L.2 N5450 DsesotssoisatMo Fiosh Ibils Rosotciateosh lhtI4 ksoatoioghoik5oa tt.t1.5 CRDoodiogessotly thtLB CRthtaisp&
CI cobs.lbt.t.7 coos jtsctt(ttotot*teo hitS taco hiltS F.dlityrl.scoot b.lt.IO Mesd.chit1ch 1),.t.t.t1 ttitdttcis.I shicti)b.l.I.t2 St.aot.oorsto.tb.J.t.I3 Itsiorooes(tooctoto Ib.1J.14 MoioTocttioo Ilt.J.t.It Mio Coochooro billS AociIc.ryboihho lb II 17 tato todfitiog chit TsL.I S S*507 126-..170 126 S S 161.S 57.-S 51 S 550.S 344-S 1733 S 2:f4X1 S S S*1,2(6)S.(PM)S 273(5 S:13.2.52 55.5.2 t)essp6esryhocp 15.1 tt.(c%So(I'seio) lb tc3(cjcyCcots 640.S S*4,593 S 7 (57 13 (ItS ('soleS Its AthI1thg1CsLt 115.2.)Spoocfoc4 co4 io4actso (b.2.2 Ohs (26.o*cooio*tit,c 115.2 90)555451 t'tioI lb ScbIttisotcI Csot Positol lb CE4)atos)Cats (bat (hososqaspesec tb32 DOCstsffrcbtsotioo
..poasoo tb.3.3 lotsosstoeoooooos)ogtosats th.3I Pososot1esets4o.tooiochsoocoI flash oasIs)h.3.5 SooO ttttd sIlsoeoo IIt.3.0 P15as etU005qtttI)StsOc th.3.7 Does sig Ih3M 95005 FOot Tasoofcs h3 Ssbtst.s(PsrjtsI lb CMote.l Cs.os 5'gtiod lb P.oioI-Pcpasobcectssts 1.4,1 lotte osqqt)ico 1.4.2 5otoos.e th4.3 I'toqcsocy sacs Ib.4.3 Iloslthphpsias coppilo.1,4.5 lasso sqoipetcotosot.)
5.4.6 Datptsslo(DAW goosra to)Ib.4.7 lisa)soorgy hatigac Ibis NRCFssa 115.4.1)Et05055053(Hattolog Fats.)h.4.tO tpcttcFootPsdO&M (SLIt (SF95 Opoostisg(2ots tb.4J2 CoqasettsMlosotiottt 15.4.13&osoisy0tsffCaoc Ib.4.).1 1)OCSts.ffCssL Lb.4.15 Utility StotCast (554 Sobts4sI Pctiot It.Psattcl.Itqtsotltot Casts.Ito TOTAL P535101)lb COST (9,550 7,Hfli 55 5(7 203 90 cot sta!!45 19: t)1:10 23 574 07 9 65 65 23 74 104 07 t5t rs6 1)2:1(0;Oft))52 35(5:506[(7 S S S S 57 5.S S S 73 5 5 5 S 10)7 s S S Fit 075 071 553 5792 4005 (557 S S S S S S (55(3 5,fi33 53,434 12.134 S S S S S S 2.024 057 3,ts7l (57)S S S S S (3535 3.15(51 It tot is 50 09:)S'S 133 1,526 1,020 s ,.S S S S S.coo (5)2 5,242 5.242*.S S 45 5 20 7)-126*55 31)9 CII).*.203.S.26 2(50 372).(509 5098 5,0(55*S S S 700-(too.S S lbS (265),2f,5*S S S S 1,500 5 5 5 5:135 (-725 I 725 s S S'S S S 1,440 Ott)t SftG 5,650'-..S 3.53(1 1,502 1(5')70%307))2,520 5 500 7,323 50697 ttrtu.-too oot.27 S S S S 7 34 tI)S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 950)96 1,055 5(502 s..S 5 5 5 5 5 S S S S S 11 13 055 155.S 5 5 5 S 3)S S S S 70 39)351 S S S.S 20)-s S*S (5 303 303..S S S S S.S S 7 5 5 tO s 0 33 33 5 5 5 150 s S 7)97 3 5 S S S S S S 55(33)1 913 1054 s S S 5 5 5 5 5.S S S.5 5 050 35 353 (5)3 S S S S S s s ,'.S S S S S 751 75 026 SOs...s s 5 5 S S 5 5 5 5 5 32)60 4('tO 459 5 5 S S S S S S S S S S S S S 45 7 55.55 5 5 5 5 S S S S S S S S S S S 504 ft0 555 tOO.s s S s s s s S S S 0.S S 5(5)77)0,!)t3 0,0)3 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 12.1,1(15 S S S S S S 5333 945 7,271 7,271 s S S.S S S S S t51,1tt7 S S S S S S (5,5)3 2392 03(15 10335.S 5 5 5 5 5 5 2(1591 27 545 7 I s 55 39,3.((5 43(34 37,671 503(1 I 150 S 541 s s 7)97 5).553575 t5 S (4 I 147 11 I 351 s 35)7 53 595 (0,20)7)1)25 6(5 051 2,1561 907 (151 Ott)s o (55 (03 2)5,301.1.5.5,573 3(1.5 21165 12,t 356 2tS0 121500 25 Sf0 152106 141 620 5(54)1 562 (25)70(5'*120 215)2(1.50)1 2(7,550 PEKIOI)I TOTALS TLG Series.Itso.}}

Latest revision as of 06:41, 16 March 2019

Enclosure 3 to ULNRC-06349 - Document A22-1690-001, Rev. 0, Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Callaway Energy Center, Section 5, Page 3 of 6 - Appendix C, Page 3 of 10
ML17097A562
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/2015
From:
TLG Services
To:
Ameren Missouri, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17097A555 List:
References
ULNRC-06349 A22-1690-001, Rev. 0
Download: ML17097A562 (26)
v • d • e


Text

ULNRC-06349 Page 75 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5, Page 3 of 6 FIGURE 5.1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSITION EnergySolutions Cute, Utah Oak Ridge, TN TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 76 of 173 CaUaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document M2-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5, Page 4 of 6 FIGURE 5.2 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE DESTINATIONS RADIOLOGICAL TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 77 of 173 Catlaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 5 of C TABLE 5.1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

Waste Volume Mass V,.,......c L ic*feet)ounds)Low-Level Rathoactive ESitjA 176 272 14,265249 Waste(near-surface disposal)wcs B 1,750 191,469 wc$_____C 393 47,411 Greater than Class C Spent Fuel tcpcP_9)qyp_GTçC 22L7 43?P ProcessedfConthtioned Recycling Vendors A 286,787 10,788,070 2725,38O Eli Waste is classified accorthng to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 t2]Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 78 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Anaiysis Document A224690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 5,Page CofC TABLE 5.2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

Low-Level Radioactive Waste (near-surface disposal)EnervSolutions WC$Wes A B C 148.204 501 406 11,859,238 50254 46,747 Waste Volume Mass----ic..ProcessedlConthtioned Recycling i:ccgccpjc!L

......Totals[21 464,594 24,309,290 Greater than Class C (geologic repository)

Spent Fuel Equivalent GTCC 2,217 433,180[11 Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55[2]Columns may not add due to rounding.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 79 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 1 of 5 6.RESULTS The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Callaway relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis prepared in 2011.While not an engineering study, the estimates provide the plant owner with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.

The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the station's spent fuel pooi for a minimum of five and on-half years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.

Once sufficiently cooled, the assemblies will be moved to the I$F$I for interim storage and to await transfer to a DOE facility (e.g., geologic repository).

The cost projected to promptly decommission (DECON)Callaway, assuming a 40-year operating life and the use of off-site low-level radioactive waste processing to reduce the volume requiring controlled disposal, is estimated to be$836.6 million.The majority of this cost (approximately 82.8%)is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the operating license can be terminated.

Another 3.5%is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel.The remaining 13.7%is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.The cost projected for deferred decommissioning (SAF$TOR), assuming a 40-year operating life and the use of off-site low-level radioactive waste processing to reduce the volume requiring controlled disposal, is estimated to be$1,091.8 million.The majority of this cost (approximately 81.3%)is associated with placing the unit in storage, ongoing caretaking of the unit during dormancy, and the eventual physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the operating license can be terminated.

Another 8.2%is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel.The remaining 10.5%is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 and 6.2, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost.The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program.It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that Ameren Missouri will oversee the TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 80 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 2 of 5 decommissioning program, using a DOC to manage the decommissioning labor force and the associated subcontractors.

The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.

However, once the operating license is terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site (for the DECON alternative).

As described in this report, the spent fuel pooi will remain operational for a minimum of five and one-half years following the cessation of operations.

The pool will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created.This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area.Over the five and one-half year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into multi-purpose canisters and transferred to the I$F$I.The I$F$I will continue to operate until such time that the transfer of spent fuel to a DOE facility is complete.The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste.As described in Section 5, disposition of the low-level radioactive material required controlled disposal is at the Energy$olutions' facility.Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment (GTCC), are packaged for geologic disposal.The cost of geologic thsposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility.Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction.

The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities.

The cost identified in the summary tables for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon prevailing union wages.Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process.The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage.With a work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license.Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 81 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 3 of 5 can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report.For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.Decontamination is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure.Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ.Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear unit.License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency.This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings.The status of any plant components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance.

While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 82 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 4 of 5 TABLE 6.1 DECON ALTERNATWE 40-YEAR PLANT OPERATING LIFE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2014 dollars)zzzEzz::::

ntjZ Decontamination 18,461 2.2 Removai-173,424J 20.7-Transportation____________________

15,934j1.9

OffsiteWastePrpçss 25,790 3.1 3O7O4 3EL2-----__?_CoiporateAllocations 9273 1.1 Spent Fue1Management[]

29,564J 3.5[Insurance

çgyç_--------I----Characterization andLicensingSurveys 2424 2?2pcy9!Q?9llJc-------,-6,956 OS Total[31 836,582 100 cp_JI__T2L_j License Termination 692,622j 82.8 2964_?:-Site Restoration 1 14396J 13.7 Total[3]836,5821 100[1]Includes engineering costs[21 Direct costs only.Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/spent fuel pooi O&M and Emergency Planning fees[3]Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 83 of 173 Cuflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Section 6, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 6.2$AF$TOR ALTERNATIVE 40-YEAR PLANT OPERATING LIFE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2014 dollars)CostElement T otal Percentage Decontamination 16,533 1.5 Removal 174,946 16.0.------Transportation 13, 139 1.2 w.-....'Th%Off-site Waste Processing 28,471 2.6 1,_gp1.,,..,.,,..--Security 155,033 14.2 CopateAllocations 9,891 O pIfpI1t icm ,___--.J4_[21""z i_cq Fees 6.7-----,---ChnzationandUSmes 24,327 22?9pcyT.-2qpca.--21,784 2.0 Total[3]1,091,753 100 PerçLicense Termination 887, 947 81.3 SpentFue1Mangçit 89388 8.2 Site Restoration 1 14,417 10.5 Total[3]1,091,753 100[1]Includes engineering costs[2]Direct costs only.Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/spent fuel pooi O&M and Emergency Planning fees[3]Columns may not add due to rounding (41 Includes percentage of Period 2a (dormancy) plant operating costs until spent fuel pool is emptied, in addition to the direct costs.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 84 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis.Section 7, Page 1 of 3 7.REFERENCES 1."Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Callaway Energy Center,"Document No.A22-1644-OO1, Rev.0, TLG Services, Inc., August 2014 2.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72,'General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 53 Fed.Reg., 24018-, June 27, 1988 3.U.s.Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159,"Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"

Rev.2, October 2011 4.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E,"Radiological Criteria for License Termination" 5.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50,"Entombment Options for Power Reactors,"

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 66 Fed.Reg.52551, October 16, 2001 6.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50 and 51,"Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 61 Fed.Reg.39278, July 29, 1996 7."Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments,"

U.S.Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982 8.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50,"Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,"

Subpart 54 (bb),"Conditions of Licenses"9."Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act,"Public Law 96-573, 1980 10."Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985,"Public Law 99-240, 1986 11.Waste is classified in accordance with U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10,Part6l.55 12.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, Final Rule,"Radiological Criteria for License Termination,"

62 Fed.Reg.39058, July 21, 1997 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 85 of 173 Callaway Energy Center.Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 2 of 3 7.REFERENCES (continued) 13."Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination,"

EPA Memorandum OSWER No.9200.4-18, August 22, 1997 14.U.S.Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16,"Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made rathonucides in community water systems"15."Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites,"OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002 16."Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM),"

NUREG/CR-1575, Rev.1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev.1, August 2000 17.T.S.LaGuardia et al.,"Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"

MF/NESP-036, May 1986 18.W.J.Manion and T.S.LaGuardia,"Decommissioning Handbook,"

U.S.Department ofEnergy, DOEIEV/10128-1, November 1980 19."Building Construction Cost Data 2014,"Robert Snow Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Massachusetts 20.Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p.239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984 21.U.S.Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,"Transportation,"

Parts 173 through 178 22.Tn-State Motor Transit Company, Radioactive Materials Tariff 23.J.C.Evans et al.,"Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 1984 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 86 of 773 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 3 of 3 7.REFERENCES (continued) 24.Ri.Smith, G.J.Konzek, W.E.Kennedy, Jr.,"Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station,"NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1978 25.H.D.Oak, et at,"Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station,"NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June 1980 26.SECY-00-0145,"Integrated Rulemaking Plan for Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning,"

June 2000 27."Microsoft Project Professional 2010,"Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA 28.cAtomic Energy Act of 1954,"(68 Stat.919)TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 87 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 1 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 88 of 173 Caltaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis AppendixA, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example: Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger<3,000 lbs.1.SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing<3,000 lbs.will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist.They wifi be thsconnected from the inlet and outlet piping.The heat exchanger wifi be sent to the waste processing area.2.CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes)(minutes)*

a Remove insulation 60 (b)b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 C Install contamination controls 20 (b)d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e Cap openings 20 (d)f Rig for removal 30 30 g Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h Remove contamination controls 15 15 i Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):-F Respiratory protection adjustment (50%of critical duration)128+RathationJALARA adjustment (37%of critical duration)95 Adjusted work duration 478+Protective clothing adjustment (30%of adjusted duration)143 Productive work duration 621+Work break adjustment (8.33%ofproductive duration)Total work duration (minutes)673***Total duration=11.217 hr****alpha designators inthcate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 89 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 AppendixA, Page 3 of 4 3.LABOR REQUIRED APPENDIX A (continued)

Laborers Craftsmen Foreman General Foreman Fire Watch Health Physics Technician Total Labor Cost Crew Number 3.00 11.217$39.47$1,328.21 2.00 11.217$54.57$1,224.22 1.00 11.217$56.98$639.14 0.25 11.217$57.98$162.59 0.05 11.217$39.47$22.14 1.00 11.217$48.84$547.84$3,924.14 4.EQUIPMENT&CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs none Consumables[Materials Costs.Universal Polypropylene Sorbent 50@$0.60/sq ft['1.Tarpaulin, oil resistant, fire retardant 50@$0.27/sq ft[2].Gas torch consumables 1@$18.85 x 1[hr[3]Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead&profit on equipment and materials@14.233/4Total costs, equipment&material TOTAL COST:$30.00$13.50$18.85$62.35$8.87$71.22 Removal ofcontaminated heat exchanger<3000 pounds:$3,995.36 Duration (hours)Rate ($/hr)Cost Total labor cost: Total equipment/material costs: Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:$3,924.14$71.22 81.88 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Enc'osure 3 Page 90 of 173 Callaway Energy Center*Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev 0 Decommissioning CostAnalysis AppendixA, Page 4 of 4 5.NOTES AND REFERENCES

.Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI)program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the"Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"

MFINESP-036, May 1986..References for equipment&consumables costs: 1.www.mcmaster.com online catalog, McMaster Carr Spifi Control (7193T88)2.R.$.Means (2014)Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0600, page 23 3.R.S.Means (2014)Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, page 698.Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Columbia, Missouri.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page9l of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 1 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 92 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 2 off APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)

Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing,$flinear foot 0.44 Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter,$/]inear foot 4.68 Removal of clean pipe>2 to 4 inches diameter,$fhnear foot 6.72 Removal of clean pipe>4 to 8 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 13.28 Removal of clean pipe>8 to 14 inches diameter,$/linear foot 25.46 Removal of clean pipe>14 to 20 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 33.20 Removal of clean pipe>20 to 36 inches diameter,$fhnear foot 48.82 Removal of clean pipe>36 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 57.96 Removal of clean valve>2 to 4 inches 87.48 Removal of clean valve>4 to 8 inches 132.77 Removal of clean valve>8 to 14 inches 254.61 Removal of clean valve>14 to 20 inches 331.95 Removal of clean valve>20 to 36 inches 488.18 Removal of clean valve>36 inches 579.62 Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping 31.06 Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping 107.87 Removal of clean pump,<300 pound 225.92 Removal ofclean pump, 300-1000 pound 627.83 Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound 2,464.05 Removal ofclean pump,>10,000 pound 4,772.28 Removal ofclean pump motor, 300-1000 pound 261.20 Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 1,021.98 Removal of clean pump motor,>10,000 pound 2,299.43 Removal of clean heat exchanger<3000 pound 1,325.75 Removal of clean heat exchanger>3000 pound 3,346.84 Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator 9,416.15 Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater 19,332.45 Removal of clean tank,<300 gallons 290.37 Removal ofclean tank, 300-3000 gallon 911.88 Removal of clean tank,>3000 gallons,$fsquare foot surface area 7.73 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 93 01173 Caflaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis , Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)

Removal ofclean electrical equipment,<300 pound 12L36 Removal ofclean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 425.26 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound$50.50 Removal of clean electrical equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean electrical transformer

<30 tons 1,406.01 Removal of clean electrical transformer

>30 tons 4,049.05 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator,<100 kW 1,436.12 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW 3,205.50 Removal ofclean standby diesel generator,>1 MW 6,636.04 Removal of clean electrical cable tray,$[linear foot 11.49 Removal of clean electrical conduit,$/linear foot 5.02 Removal of clean mechanical equipment,<300 pound 121.36 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 425.26 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 850.50 Removal ofclean mechanical equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean HVAC equipment,<300 pound 146.73 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 510.98 Removal ofclean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,018.38 Removal of clean HVAC equipment,>10,000 pound 2,024.52 Removal of clean HVAC ductwork,$/pound 0.46 Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing,$flinear foot lAO Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter,$/linear foot 19.82 Removal of contaminated pipe>2 to 4 inches thameter,$Ilinear foot 33.76 Removal of contaminated pipe>4 to 8 inches diameter,$/linear foot 53.92 Removal of contaminated pipe>8 to 14 inches diameter,$/linear foot 105.29 Removal of contaminated pipe>14 to 20 inches diameter,$Ilinear foot 126.41 Removal of contaminated pipe>20 to 36 inches diameter,$flinear foot 174.60 Removal of contaminated pipe>36 inches diameter,$flinear foot 206.16 Removal of contaminated valve>2 to 4 inches 408.26 Removal of contaminated valve>4 to 8 inches 492.14 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 94 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 4 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)

Removal of contaminated valve>8 to 14 inches 1,003.18 Removal of contaminated valve>14 to 20 inches 1,274.87 Removal of contaminated valve>20 to 36 inches 1,696.32 Removal of contaminated valve>36 inches 2,011.92 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 133.15 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping 429.69 Removal of contaminated pump,<300 pound 880.15 Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound 2,040.83 Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound 6,586.89 Removal of contaminated pump,>10,000 pound 16,045.88 Removal ofcontaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound 871.81 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 2,684.52 Removal of contaminated pump motor,>10,000 pound 6,027.15 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger<3000 pound 3,995.36 Removal ofcontaminated heat exchanger>3000 pound 11,602.53 Removal of contaminated tank,<300 gallons 1,463.53 Removal of contaminated tank,>300 gallons,$/square foot 28.55 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment,<300 pound 676.59 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,648.52 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,174.61 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray,$flinear foot 32.80 Removal of contaminated electrical conduit,$/linear foot 15.65 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment,<300 pound 752.92 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,821.37 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,501.80 Removal ofcontaminated mechanical equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment,<300 pound 752.92 Removal ofcontaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,821.37 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,501.80 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 95 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 5 off APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost[Unit($)

Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment,>10,000 pound 6,219.42 Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork,$/pound 2.03 Removallplasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components,$Ilinear in.3.60 Additional decontamination of surface by washing,$/square foot 7.49 Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing,$/square foot 33.00 Decontamination rig hook up and flush,$1 250 foot length 6,364.45 Chemical flush of components/systems,$/gallon 18.79 Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete,$/cubic yard 137.19 Removal of grade slab concrete,$/cubic yard 179.99 Removal of clean concrete floors,$/cubic yard 363.14 Removal of sections of clean concrete floors,$/cubic yard 1,067.34 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar,$/cubic yard 236.89 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar,$/cubic yard 2,056.55 Removal ofclean heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar,$/cubic yard 299.52 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar,$/cubic yard 2,721.03 Removal heavily rein concrete wiWl8 rebar&steel embedments,$/cubic yard 443.64 Removal of below-grade suspended floors,$/cubic yard 363.14 Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures,$/cubic yard 878.26 Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures,$/cubic yard 2,049.51 Removal of clean foundation concrete,$/cubic yard 692.34 Removal of contaminated foundation concrete,$/cubic yard 1,910.04 Explosive demolition ofbuik concrete,$/cubic yard 30.64 Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 96.38 Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall,$tcubic yard 319.77 Removal of clean solid masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 96.38 Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall,$/cubic yard 319.77 Backfill of below-grade voids,$/cubic yard 32.65 Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids,$/linear foot 111.87 Placement ofconcrete for below-grade voids,$/cubic yard 123.61 Excavation of clean material,$/cubic yard 3.21 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Enc'osure 3 Page 96 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 6 ofT APPENINX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)

Excavation of contaminated material,$/cubic yard 41.60 Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included),$/cubic yard 24.61 Removal of contaminated concrete rubble,$/cubic yard 26.65 Removal of building by volume,$/cubic foot 0.31 Removal of clean building metal siding,$/square foot 1.26 Removal of contaminated building metal siding,$/square foot 4.25 Removal of standard asphalt roofing,$/square foot 2.06 Removal of transite panels,$/square foot 2.04 Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill&spall),$/square foot 12.24$cabbling contaminated concrete floors,$/square foot 7.42 Scabbling contaminated concrete walls,$/square foot 19.52 Scabbling contaminated ceilings,$/square foot 66.90 Scabbling structural steel,$/square foot 5.97 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail

<10 ton capacity 599.12 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail

<10 ton capacity 1,702.27 Removal ofclean overhead crane/monorail

>10-50 ton capacity 1,437.91 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail

>10-50 ton capacity 4,084.75 Removal ofpolar crane>50 ton capacity 6,008.31 Removal of gantry crane>50 ton capacity 25,306.61 Removal of structural steel,$/pound 0.19 Removal of clean steel floor grating,$/square foot 4.46 Removal of contaminated steel floor grating,$/square foot 12.92 Removal of clean free standing steel liner,$/square foot 11.59 Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner,$/square foot 33.35 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner,$/square foot 5.80 Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner,$/square foot 38.89 Placement of scaffolding in clean areas,$/square foot 14.74 Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas,$/square foot 24.14 Landscaping with topsoil,$/acre 24,007.77 Cost of CPC B-88 L$A box&preparation for use 1,999.95 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 97 of 173 Caflaway Energy Center Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document A224690-OO1, Rev.0 Appendix B, Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)

Cost of CPC B-25 L$A box&preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box&preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 L$A box&preparation for use Cost of L$A drum&preparation for use Cost of cask liner for CN$1 8 120A cask (resins)Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (filters)8,546.72 Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming,$/square foot 0.77 1,827.70 1,485.94 10,282.72 192.76 11,931.47 TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Page 98 of 173 Callaway Energy Center Document A22-1690-OO1, Rev.0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix C, Page 1 of 10 APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON ALTERNATWE DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE 40-YEAR OPERATING LIFE with LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTiVE WASTE PROCESSING

.TLG Services, Inc.

ULNRC-06349 Pageggot 173 CtluyE,y DmmiuinngCo#tAntyaia Rv.0 10 Table C Callaway Energy Center DECON Alternative Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40-Year Operating Life with Low-Level Radioactive Waste Processing (thanasads ar2ald dallam)I'ERlOl)1&-th.th I'(,d(,d 1 1)üt Atl 1..I.I P 1.1.2 Ni5ta I..I.a I.t.4 Ntsa JPnamc orcIiag i.t.5 1.Lb P kljt P5J)45.1.7 I&;a.1..1.s Pt)(a.(i)(h-Ctn()y I.tj, 1.t.1o 1..1.11 D)t.ikdby.pmIad iam5ay I..I.I2 I*.l.I3 T5EIt.,IEA 1.I.J3 5is5pdIkCat 5tady 1.I.I5 Tüti*II b.Ll(;NRC sftanaiatipha ttaLy Sfisti..1.I7.l 1i.I7.1 Icytn 1.1.17.3 N5S5I)ei.tieFhah 1.I.I7.4 1.I.17l 1..))7fi 1.I.I7.7 S5.a 1.1.17.0 I.17.U M.a Tbü, II.I7.1U Mi 1.I.17.l I n*cta S I.I.I7i2 C5(C I.LI7.t3 PdIiCy&it,t 1.I.17 T4L Haiw&5it PwIim 1..I.1H I.L1f Pi&a&1i.25 Dca tn dc-p J*.I.21 RiggagICo..

1.I.22 SbtAIIi)dd I.Atiicy Ct P&!id I I*.a.1 SF4T,..%t I.3 Sb*lP(d)f ICIIC id I.PIDqdtCs 1.4.3 H.Ith phyi ppIi 14.1 I.45)iisIfbAW m"1 Ia4,fi McweIadc b.4.7 N1LCF h.48 I.4J INPOF b 4 0 Sp Fn)I I 0111 1*4 11 I5FSt0pmi, Cau l.1.I1 (tMk*ijm 11.4.13 Sm11y Suff0at 1&4.13 Uttily&ffCt b.4 5,bu,s.I P,*j1 I)M TOTAL tERIOI)b COST AtMty Jadaa J)aa Hm'I P*kla T,aaspn 1'mJsg I)hp.*I Oth TI T.tI M*a**at V*Iaaa CIa.t VIacsHC1itiC 01CC C.ft C.t Cat Cat C.as C.atI c Ct ta.Fast Cu.Feat Cu.Feat ('a.Fmt C'..F SV.I.h.Mahm...513 25 15)es 51$.-11110 57 667 117 ,--120 15 45 ItS*-125'!145---V te 95 7o iTt--, 7147 77 554 594----63 9 4 771--.9!15 133 10.10 1.0110--202 110 132 Ill..-50 0 so-.-584 57 Gfl 17117-.-113 17 131 55.-.$4.770 715 7405.1,5110.-.1011 45 315 145 ,...3000 400 3,155 1,150..-177 11(1 103 207--.-2700 4.15 2.1145 21715----155 211 178 175 , It------55.-.*-655-..-I,&...-----2550 432 1,312'1,1112*--.-3151-, li00-, 75151--711151.: 4,1117 ,.5151 ,.7.1151-*1.5151-.500 , , 3.120-.4,1451.1,4151-2311..275,7114-.123.10(1 12.575)211 11171714 12,1715 2*772457-.-, 1.10(2 ,-*.250-,, 1,677'.1,151-.--(4715..-791.,--11,224.-41.158 TLG Seruicca, las.B 75 102 102 115 1.279 209 (00 1100 1,100 12054 2,1515 12,1015 4,7171 31,177 51,177 7134 1711(33 57 475.1,020 0 3.7(1 65,7)13 10251 50,235 7111110.-610 9(0-.-.2,655.1110.'

ULNRC-06349 Enck3sure 3 Page 10001173 Drnrni*.iosing Co.tAnatyai.

Table C Callaway Energy Center DECON Alternative Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40-Year Operating Life witb Low-Level Radioactive Waste Processing (theosasda ef2514 dollars)Doesoost A22-1cs.-*ei Rr.I Apprsdlo C Page Soul A(oIo5y I)oooo Romoal Psokagls Traasp.rt I'rooesss I)Loposal (Ohor T.ds Ts(aI lieTons M.osieaess Rosr.t.a Voicer CIost C)oNB (OaasC UflC I'roosoed Croft C.,oaor Isdm io1isky I)osodpflao Usot Csst Coos Coos Casts Casts Celo Cadilogosey Uses Casts Coslo Casio Ca.Foot Us.Pose Cu iesi (u.Foot Cn.P.e: Wi., the.Moshooro Moshooro JERIQI)Ih I)oo.amisolmiog Proparsso Pono lb Diestltoomoissiodng AimnUo)oodoLW.k Prooloos.Ih.1.t.I PIa*e coMes th.t.L.2 N5450 DsesotssoisatMo Fiosh Ibils Rosotciateosh lhtI4 ksoatoioghoik5oa tt.t1.5 CRDoodiogessotly thtLB CRthtaisp&

CI cobs.lbt.t.7 coos jtsctt(ttotot*teo hitS taco hiltS F.dlityrl.scoot b.lt.IO Mesd.chit1ch 1),.t.t.t1 ttitdttcis.I shicti)b.l.I.t2 St.aot.oorsto.tb.J.t.I3 Itsiorooes(tooctoto Ib.1J.14 MoioTocttioo Ilt.J.t.It Mio Coochooro billS AociIc.ryboihho lb II 17 tato todfitiog chit TsL.I S S*507 126-..170 126 S S 161.S 57.-S 51 S 550.S 344-S 1733 S 2:f4X1 S S S*1,2(6)S.(PM)S 273(5 S:13.2.52 55.5.2 t)essp6esryhocp 15.1 tt.(c%So(I'seio) lb tc3(cjcyCcots 640.S S*4,593 S 7 (57 13 (ItS ('soleS Its AthI1thg1CsLt 115.2.)Spoocfoc4 co4 io4actso (b.2.2 Ohs (26.o*cooio*tit,c 115.2 90)555451 t'tioI lb ScbIttisotcI Csot Positol lb CE4)atos)Cats (bat (hososqaspesec tb32 DOCstsffrcbtsotioo

..poasoo tb.3.3 lotsosstoeoooooos)ogtosats th.3I Pososot1esets4o.tooiochsoocoI flash oasIs)h.3.5 SooO ttttd sIlsoeoo IIt.3.0 P15as etU005qtttI)StsOc th.3.7 Does sig Ih3M 95005 FOot Tasoofcs h3 Ssbtst.s(PsrjtsI lb CMote.l Cs.os 5'gtiod lb P.oioI-Pcpasobcectssts 1.4,1 lotte osqqt)ico 1.4.2 5otoos.e th4.3 I'toqcsocy sacs Ib.4.3 Iloslthphpsias coppilo.1,4.5 lasso sqoipetcotosot.)

5.4.6 Datptsslo(DAW goosra to)Ib.4.7 lisa)soorgy hatigac Ibis NRCFssa 115.4.1)Et05055053(Hattolog Fats.)h.4.tO tpcttcFootPsdO&M (SLIt (SF95 Opoostisg(2ots tb.4J2 CoqasettsMlosotiottt 15.4.13&osoisy0tsffCaoc Ib.4.).1 1)OCSts.ffCssL Lb.4.15 Utility StotCast (554 Sobts4sI Pctiot It.Psattcl.Itqtsotltot Casts.Ito TOTAL P535101)lb COST (9,550 7,Hfli 55 5(7 203 90 cot sta!!45 19: t)1:10 23 574 07 9 65 65 23 74 104 07 t5t rs6 1)2:1(0;Oft))52 35(5:506[(7 S S S S 57 5.S S S 73 5 5 5 S 10)7 s S S Fit 075 071 553 5792 4005 (557 S S S S S S (55(3 5,fi33 53,434 12.134 S S S S S S 2.024 057 3,ts7l (57)S S S S S (3535 3.15(51 It tot is 50 09:)S'S 133 1,526 1,020 s ,.S S S S S.coo (5)2 5,242 5.242*.S S 45 5 20 7)-126*55 31)9 CII).*.203.S.26 2(50 372).(509 5098 5,0(55*S S S 700-(too.S S lbS (265),2f,5*S S S S 1,500 5 5 5 5:135 (-725 I 725 s S S'S S S 1,440 Ott)t SftG 5,650'-..S 3.53(1 1,502 1(5')70%307))2,520 5 500 7,323 50697 ttrtu.-too oot.27 S S S S 7 34 tI)S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 950)96 1,055 5(502 s..S 5 5 5 5 5 S S S S S 11 13 055 155.S 5 5 5 S 3)S S S S 70 39)351 S S S.S 20)-s S*S (5 303 303..S S S S S.S S 7 5 5 tO s 0 33 33 5 5 5 150 s S 7)97 3 5 S S S S S S 55(33)1 913 1054 s S S 5 5 5 5 5.S S S.5 5 050 35 353 (5)3 S S S S S s s ,'.S S S S S 751 75 026 SOs...s s 5 5 S S 5 5 5 5 5 32)60 4('tO 459 5 5 S S S S S S S S S S S S S 45 7 55.55 5 5 5 5 S S S S S S S S S S S 504 ft0 555 tOO.s s S s s s s S S S 0.S S 5(5)77)0,!)t3 0,0)3 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 12.1,1(15 S S S S S S 5333 945 7,271 7,271 s S S.S S S S S t51,1tt7 S S S S S S (5,5)3 2392 03(15 10335.S 5 5 5 5 5 5 2(1591 27 545 7 I s 55 39,3.((5 43(34 37,671 503(1 I 150 S 541 s s 7)97 5).553575 t5 S (4 I 147 11 I 351 s 35)7 53 595 (0,20)7)1)25 6(5 051 2,1561 907 (151 Ott)s o (55 (03 2)5,301.1.5.5,573 3(1.5 21165 12,t 356 2tS0 121500 25 Sf0 152106 141 620 5(54)1 562 (25)70(5'*120 215)2(1.50)1 2(7,550 PEKIOI)I TOTALS TLG Series.Itso.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17097A562&oldid=1350301"