ML20070R114

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Description and Assessment of the Proposed Change
ML20070R114
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/2020
From:
Ameren Missouri, Union Electric Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20070R105 List:
References
ULNRC-06335
Download: ML20070R114 (10)
v • d • e


Text

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page 1 of 10 DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION Page 2 2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION Page 2

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Page 3

3.1 Background

Page 3 3.2 Deletion of Exceptions to ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 from T$ Page 4 3.3 Conforming Change to OQAM Page 3

4.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

Page 5 4.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria Page 5 4.2 Precedent Page 7 4.3 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determin ation Page 7 4.4 Conclusions Page 9 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Page 9

6.0 REFERENCES

Page 9

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page2 of 10 DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PRO POSED CHANGE 1.0

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION Ameren Missouri (Union Electric Company) is proposin g to amend Renewed Facility Operating License NPF-30 for Callaway Plant. The proposed amen dment would revise Technical Specification (TS) Administrative Control (AC) 5.3 1 and delete TS AC 5.3 1 .1 and TS AC 5.3 1 .2, as follows:

. TS AC 5 .3 1 will be revised to state, in effect, that qual ifications for members of the unit staff shall meet or exceed the minimum qualifications spec ified in the Operating Quality Assurance Manual (OQAM).

. TS AC 5.3.1 .1 and TS AC 5.3.1 .2, which contain details specified for the qualifications of certain positions within the unit staff that are duplicative with inforniation in the OQAM, will be deleted.

2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION TS AC 5.3, Unit StaffQualifications, presently state s in part:

5 .3 1 . Each member of the unit staff shall meet or exceed the minimum qualifications of ANSI/ANS 3 1-1978, with the following exceptions:

5.3 1 1

. . Shifi Managers, Operating Supervisors, Reactor Operators

, and Shift Technical Advisors shall meet or exceed the qualifications of ANSL ANS 3 1 -1 98 1 as endorsed by Reg. Guide 1 .8, Revision 2, with the same exception s as contained in the current revision to the Operator Licensing Examiner Standards, NUREG-1 021 ES-202.

5.3 1 .2

. The Radiation Protection Manager shall be a superviso r with line responsibility for operational health physics who meets or exceeds the qual ifications of USNRC Regulatory Guide 1 .8, September 1975, for a Radiation Protection Manager. The Radiation Protection Manager will be designated by the plant manager.

The exceptions to ANSI/ANS 3 1 1 978 that are identified in TS AC 5.3 1 1 and 5.3 1 .2 are also identified in the OQAM Appendix A commitment to Regu .

latory Guide 1 .8, Rev. 2, Qualification and Training ofPersonnel for Nuclear Power Plants. In orde r to reduce the regulatory burden associated with maintaining duplicate information in licensing docu ments that are subject to separate change processes (i.e., 10 CFR 50.90 for TS and 10 CFR 50.54(

a) for the OQAM), it is proposed that TS AC 5.3 1 1 and TS AC 5.3 1 .2 be deleted and that TS AC 5.3

. 1 be reworded as follows:

5 .3 1. Each member of the unit staff shall meet or exceed the minimum qualifications for the comparable position(s) addressed in the standard(s) that is referenced in the Callaway Plant Operating Quality Assurance Manual (OQAM), with exce ptions specified in the OQAM.

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page3 oflO A page markup reflecting the proposed change to TS AC 5.3 1 and deletion of TS AC 5 .3 1 1 and TS AC 5.3.1 .2 is provided in Attachment 1, and a retyp . .

ed replacement TS page (reflecting the proposed changes) is provided in Attachment 3 to this Enclosur e.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3 1

. Background The history of Callaway TS administrative controls for unit staff qualifications is described below.

During the initial licensing of Callaway Plant, the NRC established an obligation for Arneren Missouri to use personnel qualification standard ANSI/ANS 3

. 1 -1 978 for members of the unit staff (with exceptions for the qualifications ofthe Superintenden t, Health Physics, licensed Operators and Senior Operators), as part ofthe Technical Specifications that were provided as Appendix A to the Callaway Plant Low Power License NPF-25 (issued as NUREG-l 058, Rev. 0) and as Appendix A to the Callaway Plant Operating License NPF-3 0 (issued as NUREG-l 058, Rev. 1). Unit staff qualifications were specifically addressed under TS 6.3 1 as estab

. lished at the time.

The contents of TS 6.3 1 were based largely on a Note contained in model TS 6.3 1 Unit Staff Qualifications, in NUREG-0452, Rev. 4, Standar . ,

dized Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors. The Note stated in part that minimum staffqualifications for members ofthe unit staffshall be specified by use ofan over all qualification statement referencing (an ANSI Standard agreed to by the NRC staff) or alternately by specifying individual position qualifications.

As noted above, exceptions to the applicable standard, ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978, were specified in TS 3 .6. 1 in regard to the qualifications for certain positions Later in Callaway Plants licensing history, License Ame ndment 60 relocated the exceptions to ANSI/ANS 3 1 1 978 from TS 6.3 1 to new TS 6.3 1

. . 1 and TS 6.3 1 .2. License Amendment 60 also modified the exception for licensed Operators and Seni or Operators (i.e., in TS 6.3 .1 .1), and made the exception apply specifically to the position titles Shi ft Supervisors, Operating Supervisors, Reactor Operators and Shift Technical Advisors. License amen dment 92 replaced the specific position title Superintendent, Health Physics with the ANSI/AN S 3.1-1978 generic position title Radiation Protection Manager, and added a description ofthe posi tion to TS 6.3.1 .2, without altering the exception that had been taken to ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978.

In the 1999-2000 timeframe, License Amendment 133 was issued, which reflected Callaway Plants conversion to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS

). License amendment 133 relocated TS 6.3.1, TS 6.3.3.1 and TS 6.3.1.2 to new TS AC 5.3.1, TS AC 5.3.1.1 and TS AC 5.3.1.2, respectively, as part of ITS implementation. The most recent TS change relat ed to the exceptions to ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 was License Amendment 173, which revised TS AC 5.3.1.1 to replace the specific (plural) position title Shift Supervisors with Shift Managers.

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page 4 of 10 3.2 Deletion ofExceptions to ANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 from TS Exceptions to personnel qualification standard ANSI/AN S 3 1-1 978 are also specified in the Operating Quality Assurance Manual (OQAM) Appendix A commitm ent to Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Rev. 2, Qualification and Training ofpersonnel for Nuclear Pow er Plants. The full text ofthe OQAM commitment reads as follows:

Ameren Missouri complies with the recommendations of this Regulatory Guide with the following clarifications and exceptions:

Revision 1, dated 9/75, applies to the position ofRadiati on Protection Manager only, in accordance with the Callaway Plant Technical Specifica tions. For the position of Radiation Protection Manager only, Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Revision 1 September, 1975 is clarified by USNRC HPPOS-020, Clarification of Regulatory Guide 1 .8 on Qualification of Radiation Protection Manager.

The experience, training, and education requirements for the positions of Shift Manager, Operating Supervisor, and Reactor Operator, and personnel fulfilling the duties of Shift Technical Advisor shall meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of ANSI/ANS 3 1-1981 as endorsed by the Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Revision 2, with the same exceptions as contained in the current revision to the Operating Licensin g Examiner Standards, NUREG 1021, ES 202.

For all other positions, qualification and training shall com ply with ANSI/ANS 3 1-1 978 as clarified below: .

Refer to Callaway SA FSAR Section 13.1 for a discussion ofthe qualifications of personnel responsible for plant operation and support.

Personnel responsible for directing or supervising the cond uct of safety related preoperational and startup tests and for review and approval of safety relat ed preoperational and startup test procedures or results met the qualifications of the Regulator y Guide, but were not required to be certified.

Ameren Missouri may use additional Ameren employe es or contract personnel to augment the unit staff These groups include, but are not limited to, Ame ren personnel from outside Nuclear Generation as well as supplemental Radiation Prot ection and I&C technicians and QC inspectors. When used to perform safety-related activities

, these personnel shall meet the education and experience requirements of ANSI/ANS 3

. 1-1978 for equivalent positions or specified education and experience requirements for non-equivalent positions. As an alternative, these personnel can be qualified for assigned tasks either by Ameren Missouri through its systematic approach to training or by Vendors with Ameren Missouri approved training and qualification programs. Inspection, examinati on and testing personnel shall meet the requirements for certification as inspection, examinati on or testing personnel as set forth in Ameren Missouris commitment to ANSI N45.2.6-1978 given elsewhere in this Appendix.

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page5 of 10 With regard to Section 5.6 ofANSI/ANS 3.1-1978 titled Documentation: Ameren Missouri shall maintain records in accordance with and to meet the requirements of OQAM Section 17 and ANSI N45.2.9 as specified herein.

As shown above, the fourth paragraph ofthe OQAM commitment to Regulatory Guide 1.8, Rev. 2, specifies the use of ANSI/ANS 3 1 1 978 for qualifica tion and training, with exceptions for the positions of Shifi Manager, Operating Supervisor, Reac tor Operator, and Shift Technical Advisor being provided in the second paragraph of the commitm ent, and exceptions for the Radiation Protection Manager being provided in the third para graph ofthe commitment. It can be seen that the exceptions that are taken to ANSI/ANS 3 1 -1 978 in the OQAM commitment are identical to those contained in TS AC 5.3.1.1 and TS AC 5.3.1.2.

In consideration of the above, the proposed deletion of the exceptions to ANSI/ANS 3 1 -1 978 from the TS is administrative in nature, and will not result in a .

change to Callaway Plants commitment to the noted standards for qualification ofmembers ofthe unit staff.

3 .3 Conforming Change to OQAM It should be noted that the proposed changes to TS AC 5 .3 1 , including the deletion of TS AC 5.3.1.1 and TS AC 5 .3 1 .2, if approved, will require a change be made to the OQAM. Specifically, in the OQAM Appendix A commitment to Regulatory Guid e 1 .8, Rev. 2, the text ofwhich was just presented in Section 3.2, it can be seen that the seco nd paragraph describes or clarifies qualification requirements applicable to the position of Radiation Protection Manager in accordance with the Callaway Plant Technical Specifications. In light of the proposed change to delete TS AC 5.3.1.2, this reference to the TS will no longer be applicable or appropriate if the proposed TS changes in this license amendment request are approved. The note d OQAM text will thus be revised as shown in Attachment 2 to this Enclosure. This OQAM change is presented for information only, and will be implemented in connection with implementation of the proposed license amendment after approval.

4.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

4. 1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements I Criteria The regulatory requirements and/or guidance documen ts associated with this amendment application include the following:

The regulations in paragraph (c)(5) of 1 0 CFR 50.3 6, Technical specifications, provide requirements for the content of the TS in the category of administ rative controls.

The regulations in 1 0 CFR 50. 120, Training and qual ification of nuclear power plant personnel, require training and qualification for personnel to oper ate and maintain the facility in a safe manner in all modes of operation.

Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants, to 10 CFR 50 provides requirements for quality assuranc e programs. The regulations in 10 CFR 50.54(a)

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page6 of 10 provides requirements for making changes to quality assurance programs. Paragraph 50.54(a)(3) of 10 CFR states in part that:

Each licensee described in [10 CFR 50.54(a)(1)] may make a change to a previously accepted quality assurance program description included or referenced in the Safety Analysis Report without prior NRC approval, provided the change does not reduce the commitments in the program description as accepted by the NRC. Changes to the quality assurance program description that do not reduce the commitments must be submitted to the NRC in accordance with the requirements of

[10 CFR] 50. 71(e).

Paragraph 50.54(a)(4) of 1 0 CFR requires changes to the quality assurance program that do reduce commitments to be submitted to the NRC and receive NRC approv al prior to implementation.

Section 13.2.2, Non-Licensed Plant StaffTraining, (ADAM S Accession No. ML l5006Al29) of NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: [Light-Water Reactor] LWR Edition, provides guidan ce for the review of training programs for non-licensed plant staff.

NRC Administrative Letter (AL) 95-06, Relocation of Techni cal Specification Administrative Controls Related to Quality Assurance, dated December 12, 1 995 (ADAMS Accession No. MLO3 1 1 1 0271), provides guidance for relocating requirements from the administrative controls section ofTSs in cases where adequate controls are provided by other methods.

AL 95-06 notes that the quality assurance program is a logical candidate for such relocations due to the controls imposed on the quality assurance program by regulat ions (e.g., 1 0 CFR 50, Appendix B, and 10 CFR 50.54(a)), and the existence ofNRC-approved quality assurance plans and commitments to industry quality assurance standards.

NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.8, Revision 4, Qualification and Training ofPersonnel for Nuclear Power Plants, dated June 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19101A395), provides guidance that is acceptable to the NRC staffregarding training and qualifications ofnuclear power plant personnel.

Revision 1 of RG 1 8 endorsed ANSI Nl 8 1 -1 971 with one exception. Revision 2 (April 1 987) of RG 1 8 endorsed ANSI/ANS-3 1 -1 98 1 for certain positions and ANSI Nl 8 1 -1 971 for other positions, with exceptions, clarifications, and additions. Revision 3 (May 2000) ofRG 1 .8 endorsed ANSI/ANS 3 1 -1 993 with exceptions, clarifications, and additions. Revisi on 4 of RG 1 8 endorsed ANSI/ANS 3 1 -2014, with exceptions, clarifications, and additions.

There are no changes being proposed in this amendment applica tion such that conformance or commitments to the regulatory requirements and/or guidance documents above would come into question. The evaluations documented herein confirm that Callaway Plant will continue to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements.

In conclusion, based on considerations discussed herein, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operati on in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission s regulations, and (3) issuance of the

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page7 of 10 amendment will not be inimical to the common defe nse and security or to the health and safety of the public.

4.2 Precedent A precedent for the proposed change to relocate qual ification requirements and exceptions from the to the OQAM may be found in a letter dated Aug 1S ust 2, 201 8 from the NRC Office of Nuclear Reac Regulation (NRR) to Exelon (Reference 1 9), whic tor h approved changes to the QA Topical Report (QATR) for Exelon (the fleet equivalent to Callaway Plants OQAM), and issued license amendments to Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 ; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 3; James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant; LaSa and lle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Poin t Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Quad Citie

s Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E.

Nuclear Power Plant; and Three Mile Island Nucl Ginna ear Station, Unit 1 Section 3 .0 of the Safety Evaluation Report attached to the August 2, 201 .

8 letter states in part:

The relocation ofthe licensees staff qualification requirements to the Exelon QATR is consistent with the guidance in AL 95-06 and with past precedent.

The NRC staff concludes that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36 and 50. 120 will continue to be met because the licensees staff qualification requ irements will not be changed by these amendments. In addition, future changes to the licen sees staff qualification requirements that are relocated to the Exelon QATR must be made in accordance with 1 0 CFR 50.54(a). Future reduction in commitments associated with the licen sees staff qualification requirements that are relocated to the Exelon QATR will require NRC approval, per 1 0 CFR 50.54(a)(4), prior to implementation. Therefore, the proposed 1S chan ges and relocation ofthe licensees staff qualification requirements to the Exelon QATR are acceptable.

4.3 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Ameren Missouri has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with proposed amendment by focusing on the three stand the ards set forth in 1 0 CFR 50.92, Issuance of amendment, as discussed below:

1 Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?

Response: No The proposed license amendment would delete exce ptions to personnel qualification standard ANSI/ANS 3 1-1978 that are identified in the Adm inistrative Controls section of the Callaway Plant Technical Specifications but which are also identified in, and would remain in the Callaway Plant Operating Quality Assurance Manual (OQ AM). The proposed changes will not impact the design, operation, testing, performance, or reliability of any plant system or component. The changes do not affect licensed operator qualifica tions or training, which will continue to comply

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page8 of 10 with applicable regulations. The changes do not affect operating procedures or operator response to any accidents previously evaluated in the Fina l Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).

Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evalu ated.

2. Does the proposed change create the possibilit y of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?

Response: No The proposed license amendment is administrativ e in nature and does not introduce any credible new failure mechanisms, malfunctions, or accident initiators. The changes will not alter the plant configuration, require new plant equipment to be installed, alter accident analysis assumptions, introduce any new accident initiators, or affect the function of plant systems or the manner in which systems are operated, maintained, modified

, tested, or inspected.

Therefore, it is concluded that this change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

3 Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?

Response: No The margin of safety is established through equi pment design, operating parameters, and the setpoints at which automatic actions are initiated.

The proposed change is administrative in nature and does not involve any physical changes to the plant or alter the manner in which plant systems are operated, maintained, modified, tested, or insp ected. The proposed change does not alter the manner in which safety limits, limiting safety syste m settings or limiting conditions for operation are determined. The safety analysis acceptance criteria are not affected by this change. The proposed change will not result in plant operation in a configuration outside the design basis. The proposed change does not adversely affect systems that respond to safely shutdown the plant or are used to maintain the plant in a safe shutdown cond ition.

Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed chan ge does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

In consideration of all of the above, Ameren Miss ouri concludes that the proposed changes prese significant hazards consideration under the stand nt no ards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and on that finding of no significant hazards consideration basis, a is justified.

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page 9 of 10 4.4 Conclusions Based on the considerations discussed above, 1) there is a reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the prop osed changes, 2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commissions regu lations, and 3) the issuance ofthe amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and secu rity or to the health and safety of the public.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed change does not involve (i) a significa nt hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or a significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occu pational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed change meets the eligibility criterion for categ orical exclusion set forth in 1 0 CFR 5 1 .22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 1 0 CFR 5 1 .22(b

), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in conn ection with the proposed change.

6.0 REFERENCES

1 . ANSI/ANS 3 1 1 978, Standard for Selection and Train ing of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants

2. ANSI/ANS 3 1 -1 98 1, Selection, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants
3. Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Rev. 2, Qualification and Training ofPersonnel for Nuclear Power Plants (April 1987)
4. NUREG-l 021 Rev. 1 0, Operator Licensing Exam iner Standards Final Report (ADAMS Accession No. ML14352A297)
5. Regulatory Guide 1 .8 Rev. 1 Personnel Selection and Training (September 1975)
6. NUREG-0452, Rev. 4, Standardized Technical Spec ifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors,
7. NUREG-1431 Rev. 4, Standard Technical Specifica tions Westinghouse Plants 8.

NUREG-1058 Rev. 0, Technical Specifications Call away Plant, Unit No. 1

9. NUREG-1058 Rev. 1, Technical Specifications Call away Plant, Unit No. 1 1 0. NRC Letter dated December 7, 1 990 from A. T. God y to D. F. Schnell, Amendment No.

60 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 (TAC No. 75506) (ADAMS Accession No. MLO2 1680076) 1 1 NRC Letter dated September 6, 1 994 from L. R.

Wharton to D. F. Schnell, Amendment No. 92 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 Callaway Plant, Unit 1 (TAC No.

MB6075) (ADAMS Accession No. MLO2 1640006)

12. NRC letter dated May 28, 1999 from J. N. Don ohew to G. L. Randolph, Conversion to Improved Technical Specifications for Callaway Plan t, Unit 1 Amendment No. 133 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 (TAC No.

M98603) (ADAMS Accession No. MLO2 1640446) 1 3 NRC letter dated July 1 1 2006 from J. Donohew to C. D. Naslund, Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Issuance ofAmendment Re: Revising a Position Title and Department Name in

Enclosure to ULNRC-06335 Page 10 of 10 Technical Specification 5 .0, Administrative Con trols (TAC No. MD1 1 6 1) (ADAMS Accession No. MLO6 1250207)

14. US NRC Health Physics Position HPPOS-020, Clarification ofRegulatory Guide 1.8 on Qualification of Radiation Protection Manager (ADAMS Accession No. ML103420211) 1 5. NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: [Light-Water Reactor] LWR Edition, Section 13.2.2, Non-Licensed Plant StaffTraining (ADAMS Acce ssion No. ML15006A129) 1 6. NRC Administrative Letter 95-06: Relocati on of Technical Specification Administrative Controls Related to Quality Assurance, dated Dece mber 12, 1995 (ADAMS Accession No. ML031110271)
17. Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Rev. 3, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants (May 2000) (ADAMS Accession No. MLOO3 706932) 1 8. Regulatory Guide 1 .8, Rev. 4, Qualification and Training ofPersonnel for Nuclear Power Plants (June 2019) (ADAMS Accession No. ML19101A395)
19. NRC Letter dated August 2, 2018 from B. L.

Pumell to B. C. Hanson, Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2; Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 Dres

den Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant; LaSa lle County Station, Units 1 and 2; Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2; Nine Mile Poin t Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2; R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant; and Thre e Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Issuance of Amendments to Relocate the Staff Qual -

ification Requirements (EPID L-201 8-LLA-0053) (ADAMS Accession No. ML18206A282)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20070R114&oldid=3543760"