ML13144A037: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = General FR Notice Comment Letter
| document type = General FR Notice Comment Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}



Revision as of 04:29, 8 February 2019

Comment (327) of Kenneth H. Mcclain Urging NRC to Reject Southern California Edison'S License Amendment Request for Unit 2
ML13144A037
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2013
From: McClain K H
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bladey C K
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00327
Download: ML13144A037 (1)


Text

0o a1-czn N) C1 Kenneth H. McClain, ACSW -14871 Novice Street 2 North Hills, CA 91343 April 26, 2013 Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB)Office of Administration Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Re: Proposed License Amendment for San Onofre Nuclear Plant

Dear Chief Bladey:

I object to the proposal for a license amendment for the San Onofre Nuclear Plant. Since this is an older nuclear plant and there have been several unexpected leakages and worrisome problems about the operation of this plant, public safety demands that all operational issues receive maximum scrutiny before permitting this plan to be brought back on line. I believe a truncated or abbreviated process to allow the plant to restart is definitely undesirable and a threat to the well-being of the nearby population.

Sincerely, Kenneth H. McClain, ACSW SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bib)