NL-12-168, Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 4

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 4

ML12353A469
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	11/20/2012
From:	Farah M Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-168 IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev 0
Download: ML12353A469 (188)

Text

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-92 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NI IMu Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 32 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -077. 058, 100 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDI UDl N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y] NDI uDl N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE ND:I UD1 N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about :35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-93 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI UFi-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 32 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-077. 058. 100

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-I N/A[I:

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI ULI NIADI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE Ni UiD N/AEi interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YU NDI UD- N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed scaffold #4355 erected on 7125/12. The scaffolding seems well supported and was judged acceptable. Therefore, the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-94 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NEI Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area' 32 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-077. 058. 100

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NE] ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed three ceiling light bulbs that need to be replaced. This is not a seismic concern. Replacement of bulbs is addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03363.

References:

IP3 SWELl-077, 1-058, 1-100 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah ____ WDate: 10/19/2012 Stephen Yuan Date: 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-95 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-020 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 32 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWEL1-077. 058. 100 Photographs 4 Note: no photos attached I I Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-96 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YEE NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 33 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-078 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YLI NE UID N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed a wide flange across the room (spanning east-west) supporting B574 duct with a gap between the base plate and the east wall. The gap is observed to be approximately between 1/8" to ! 4" (see attached photo). This gap may result in bending of the anchor bolts.

This is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03361. LB-05 evaluates this condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UDl N/ADl significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YEZ NDI UDl N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-97 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YN NDI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15"-O" Room, Area 1 33 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-078

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UD- N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD1 N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uD' N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uD1 N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-98 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NO UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-021 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 33 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-078

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed two ceiling light bulbs that need to be replaced. The light bulb replacement is addressedin CR-IP3-2012-3363.

Reference:

IP3 SWELl-078 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/19/12 Stephen Yuan 10/19/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-99 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 AWC-021 Status: YEZ NI UIr Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15-0" Room, Area 1 33 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-078 Photographs Note: wide flange across the room (spanningeast- Note:

west) supporting B574 duct with a gap between the base plate and the east wall EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-100 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YE NOI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-025 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN ND UD- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ N[D] UE-] N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NDJ UD:] N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-101 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE ND-1 UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location: Bldg. PA FloorEl. 41"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-025

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UDJ N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI UDl N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uD- N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NE uD1 N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed a broken fluorescent light fixture directly above CS Pump 32.

The fixture is tied in the center (with rope or zip tie) but loose at the north end. During a seismic event the fixture may fall and strike the oil reservoir or any sensitive equipment (see attachedphoto). This is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03481.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-102 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE Nil ui--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location: Bldg. PA FloorEl. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -025

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UtI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IZP.o-h oa-I h,@ AAo,. in C.

I-. v

• i uiGI L*lJ JJy, UU

,%h ýE Date: 10/22/12 Kai Lo 1C§. 10/22112 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-103 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE N-- uLI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-022 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-O" Room,Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-025 Photographs Note: broken fluorescent light fixture directly Note:

above CS Pump 32 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-104 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 IP3 Status: YO NDI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41-0 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -024 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI uD- N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE ND UD- N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[O NDI UD-I N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YD NO uDl N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Observed Fluorescentlight bulbs that are not secured or tied to the light fixture. During a seismic event, the bulbs may become loose and strike nearby sensitive equipment. This is addressedin IP3 SWELl-024 and CR-IP3-2012-03481.

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-105 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -024

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI- uD N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yr NDI UD- N/A[:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NE uDI N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed tools, cables, parts resting on top of the CCW tank (see attached photos).

Observed two buckets (collecting drips) at 32 CCW pump (see attached photos).

Observed a bucket (with wheels) and mop stick nearthe hot water heaternear Sump Pump 37 (see attached photo).

Observed hoses coming out of CCW tank that are laid over piping, piping supports and ducts that are not tied down. The ends of two hoses seem to travel to an upper elevation connecting to another CCW tank. Another hose is resting on top of a pipe near SWN-32.

Observed a laddernear the Appendix R safe shutdown ladderthat is not restrained.

The aforementioneditems must be tied down/properlysecured or removed to prevent any interaction with nearby equipment. This is addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03501.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-106 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 1P3 Status: YM NEI Ut]-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -024

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEIr ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference:

IP3 S WEL 1-024 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/22/12 Kai Lo 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-107 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP3 Status: YE NO UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -024 Photographs EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-108 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 IP3 Status: YIZ NE-] U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWELl -024 Note: wheeled bucket and a mop stick Note: loose hose laying on floor going to an upper elevation.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-109 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP3 Status: YE NEI UL-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-023 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-O Room,Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -024 Note: Unrestrainedladderby the Appendix R Note:

safe shutdown ladder.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-110 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: Y[Z NDI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15"-O" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMPROOM (CELL 31)

SWEL Components: SWELl -028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YIE NEI uD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN ND U-i N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YIE NDI Uil N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item, EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-111 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YN ND UD1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15"-O" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL 31)

SWEL Components: SWELl -028

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED NDI uD N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDl UID N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NDI uID N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-112 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YIZ NEI UWý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL 31)

SWEL Components: SWELl -028

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI u--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference:

IP3 SWELl-028 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/22/12 Kai Lo 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-113 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI u[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-024 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMPROOM (CELL 31)

SWEL Components: SWELl-028 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-114 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -092, 098, 093 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UD' N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

TR-4004 support base plate is missing two out of four anchor bolts.

This is typical of all four base plates and based on the size of the cabinet,it is judged that this configurationis adequate for applied seismic loading.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YDi NO UiD N/ADI significant degraded conditions?

Electric heat tracing cabinet support base plates and anchor bolts are severely corroded. The Unistrut support column has been welded to the stairstringerto provide additional support. CR-IP3-2012-03595 documents this condition. LB-19 has evaluated this condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDI UD- N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Fluorescenttubes need to be restrained. This is a not a seismic adverse condition since equipment in the area are noted as hard targets. CR-IP3-2012-03595has been written to remedy this condition.

The ladders at the entranceto the Nonregenerative Heat Exchanger Room need to be secured. This is not a seismic adverse concern since the ladders are not nearany sensitive equipment. Good practice is to tie the ladders to the support frame. CR-IP3-2012-03501 has been written to investigate this condition.

The following observation relate to duct FR-DF-40:

" The vise grips used to hold the seams on duct need to be replaced with a permanentcorrective solution.

" One wall of the above duct is totally separatedfrom the vertical comer and is flapping freely.

The wall of the duct is light in weight and will not damage the nearby boric acid tank. In addition, total separationfrom the duct is unlikely:

therefore, this is judged to have no adverse seismic condition. CR-IP3-2012-03595 has been written to correctthese conditions.

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Flall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about :35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-115 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P3 Status: YE ND ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -092, 098, 093

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND ULI N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescenttubes need to be restrained.This is a not a seismic adverse condition since equipment in the area are noted as hard targets. Good practice is to tie the bulbs to the fixture. CR-IP3-2012-03481 has been written to correct this condition.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND uD N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIZ ND uD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YD NE UID N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A pipe hanger is close (approx 2') to a conduit. See photo for location.

The seismically designed conduit is very rigid and will have less than

0. 1 "seismic displacement. The nearby hangerrod is for dead weight only but the pipe is seismically restrainedso the lateraldisplacement will also be small. The Y" clearance is judged to be acceptable.

In the South-east corner of the room there are pallets of drums and a vacuum that are all unrestrained.The drums and vacuum are remote from any equipment and this is notjudged to be an adverse seismic condition. CR-IP3-2012-03501 has been written to address this condition.

There is a hot water heater adjacentto the concrete column near Boric Acid Tank 31 which does not have any apparentanchorage. CR-IP3-2012-03595 has been written to investigate this condition.

Through wall room airconditioners are hung for gravity loading but do not appearto have any lateralrestraintfor seismic loading. Since there is no safety related equipment nearby, there is no adverse spatial interaction.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-116 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 1P3 Status: Y[ NEI- U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -092, 098, 093

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIl UlI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

One light bulb above CC Surge Tank #31 needs to be replaced.

Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan _Date: 10/22/2012 PaulHuebsch Date: 1012212012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-117 of 192 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP3 Status: YO NE] UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -092. 098. 093 Photographs Note: Base plate with two out of four anchorbolts Note: Electric heat tracing cabinet base plate in place.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-118 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P3 Status: YN NEI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-O" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWELl-092, 098, 093 Note: Ductwork with side not connected at comer ts, drums and vacuum not secured.

seam.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-119 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP3 Status: YE NEI UnL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-025 Location: Bldg, PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-092, 098,093 I I I I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-120 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UD- N/AD'-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI UED N/AD-significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NDI UD- N/A[--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-121 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NDI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -039

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[Z NDI ULI N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND-- uDi N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NDI UDI N/ADJ interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI uD- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-122 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -039

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012 PaulHuebsch Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-123 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NO UD1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-026 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -039 Photographs No photos of this area Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-124 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YO NEI U['-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL32)

SWEL Components: SWELl 4029 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UD N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U[] N/All significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YDl NO u-I N/AD1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Observed a waste disposal liquidpipe (approximately 4" in diameter) coming out of the north wall then penetrates the floor with an unsupportedlength of approximately 25 ft to 30 ft (see attachedphoto).

LB-12 evaluates this condition.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NiD UD- N/AD I spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with otherequipment in the area.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item, EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-125 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL32)

SWEL Components: SWELl -029

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI u-1 N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uD- N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ ND uD1 N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YDI NDI uDý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-126 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YM NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL32)

SWEL Components: SWELl -029 Comments (Additional pages may be added as nec(

Reference:

IP3 SWEL 1-029 LB-12 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah _ ____ Date: 10/22/12 Kai Lo Ic- 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-127 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI Ur-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-027 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 RHR PUMP ROOM (CELL32)

SWEL Components: SWELl-029 Photographs Note: piping with an unsupportedlength of Note:

approximately25 ft to 30 ft EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-128 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YIZ NDI U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YDI N[ U-I N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Camera mounted on post with base plate which has no anchorbolts and stands adjacentto the stairway. CR-IP3-2012-03565has been written to correct this condition.

LB-12 was performed to evaluate the condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO ND' UD N/All significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NDI u0 N/AD1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[D] NOZ UD N/AD' spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

See question #1.

1If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-129 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NDI ULI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55"-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 009

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI urI N/AEl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[D UD_10 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uDl N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Various housekeeping practiceswere identified:

- Loose padlocks left in the area.Because of the small mass of the padlocks and there location, this is not considered an adverse seismic condition. It is considered to be a housekeeping problem.

- Unsecured tool boxes and unlocked electrical cabinet noted.

This condition exists remote from equipment which might be affected by a seismic event.

- Fluorescenttube missing neartransformer32. This is not an adverse seismic condition.

CR-IP3-2012-03501 tracks the resolutions.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NDI uD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-130 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEi- U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55"-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 009 Evaluated by: Stephe Yuan EyY____Date: 10/22/2012 Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-131 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-028 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 009 Photographs Note: Loose padlocks on top of cabinet Note: Unsecured tool box on top of cabinet and cabinet door not closed.

Note: Camera on post with unsecured base plate Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-132 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: YO NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -087 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YDI NO UD-- N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Appendix R cabinet EBR-22-PAB is not snug againstthe support.

There is a gap between the back of the cabinet and the supporting surface at the top. The nut inside the Unistrutchannel is still engaged and the bolt is still there. SWEs judged that the EBR will not fall during a seismic event.

CR-IP3-2012-03557has been written to evaluate this condition to properly secure this item.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI u-I N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UD N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-133 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -087

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI ULIE N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI ULI N/Ar-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD- N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YD- NE uDl N/A--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Various housekeeping practiceswere identified:

- Loose cart found in the area.

CR-IP3-2012-03501 tracks the resolution.

- Loose part found in the area nearEBR-22-PAB CR-IP3-2012-03501 tracks the resolution.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-134 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NO ULM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -087

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl LI-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

___ -__Date: 10/22/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan PaulHuebsch (1 Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-135 of 192 A'TACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-029 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -087 Photographs Note: Appendix R cabinet with gap at top behind Note: Unsecured cart back plate EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-136 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: YrI NDI UN Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -027 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDI UD- N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Pipes connected to and near valve AC-757E have long unsupported length in the vertical direction This condition is shown on drawing 9321-F-55743 for line no. 641. The piping is seismic class l and has been analyzed and supported seismically.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UD1 N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWAVEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-137 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YD- NDI U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -027

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI UD:] N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI U'- N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

The area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD- N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NDI IEU N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-138 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE] NEI UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -027

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI] UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fvaluatedl bh' tetpnhvn Yuaqn Date: 10/22/2012 Dae 112 PaulHuebsch _________________________________________Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-139 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y-I NEi UZ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-030 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -027 Photographs Note: Pipes connected to and near valve AC-757E Note:

have long unsupportedlength in the vertical direction and are in contact nearthe ceiling.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-140 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YEZ NEI U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 34'-0" Room, Area1 SAFETY INJECTION PUMPROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -021 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] Ur N/ADI potentially adverse seismic conditions (ifvisible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NO UD N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ ND UD-- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about :35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-141 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[O NDI UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location: Bldg. PA FloorEl. 34'-0" Room, Area1 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -021

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[Z NDI ULIE N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ N[D1 UD1 N/ADl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI uDl N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NZ uD' N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed a brush, tape and a filter resting, unrestrainedon a shelf located on the south wall of the room between SI Pumps 31 and 32 (see attached photo). During a seismic event these items may dislodge or act as missile and strike nearby components. This is addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03501.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-142 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NiD U[--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location: Bldg. PA FloorEl. 34'-0" Room, Area 1 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -021

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEil UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/22/12 Kai Lo 6I ~/L 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-143 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[D NEI uF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-031 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 34"-0" Room, Area 1 SAFETY INJECTION PUMPROOM SWEL Components: SWELl-021 Photographs Note: unrestrainedfilter, brush and tape on wall Note:

shelf.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-144 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NDJ UD:] N/AD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDJ UEJ N/AD-]

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NDI UD N/ADl raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-145 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP3 Status: YIO NEI UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -026

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UID N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent tubes need to be restrained.CR-IP3-2012-03481 has been written to remedy this condition.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YiI NO uD- N/A[-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Area heaterUH335 has threadedhot water piping which does not appearto be seismically supported.Maximum span is approximately 15 feet for estimated 2" diameterpipe. Area heater UH334 has a similar condition but it is more remote from the equipment area.

LB-14 was performed to analyze this condition.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NEI UD N/A--

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI u-1 N/A[D interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Screw driver left on Unistrut. See photo. This is considered a housekeeping condition and not considered an adverse seismic condition.

Miscellaneous parts on top of panel. See photo. This is considered a housekeeping condition and not considered an adverse seismic condition.

CR-IP3-3012-03501 has been written to remedy this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-146 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEII UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -026

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UDý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference:

LB-14

__ _ _ -- _ _ Date: 10/22/2012 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan PaulHuebsch Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-147 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEIrUr-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-032 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -026 Photographs Not: Srewdriverleft on Unistrut Note: Miscellaneous partson top of panel Note: Area heater UH334 piping not seismically Note:

supported EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-148 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 1P3 Status: YO NDI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YD-- NO UD-- N/AD--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Observed a PVC west of the RWST PurificationPump that is secured to the Unistrut with a zip tie. The PVC comes out of the west wal and penetrates PA 119 duct in the overhead (see attachedphotos). The unsupported length from the wall to the duct is approximately 12 ft. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03583.

LB-15 evaluates this condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI uD1 N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NDI UID- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-149 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Status: Y[* ND 1P3UD--

Sheet 2 of 4 (AWC) AWC-033 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. PAB FloorEl. 41'-0" Room,Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UIl N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI uD-- N/ADl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uD- N/AD-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NE uDl N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed a compressed air tank cap resting on the compressed air tank support (gas bottle rack) located on the south wall nearRWST PurificationPump. During a seismic event, the cap may act as a missile and strike nearby equipment. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03501.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-150 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ NEI U"-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location: Bldg. PAB FloorEl. 41'-O" Room,Area_

SWEL Components: SWEL2-001

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[: ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed a clock mounted on the north wall near the RWST PurificationPump and the Monitor Tank Pumps that is well secured. SWES judged the clock to have no adverse seismic interaction.

Reference:

LB-15 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/22/12 Ka o C 10122112 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-151 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NE-I Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-033 Location: Bldg. PAB FloorEl, 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-001 Photographs Note: PVC penetratesduct Note: Loose cap behind the compressed air Note:

bottles.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-152 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 3 1P3 Status: YWI NEI UN Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -084, 097 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NO UW N/A[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NWi UW1 N/ArI significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NWI uWl N/A-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YM NEI UW- N/AWl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with otherequipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIN NWI UW N/AWl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-153 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 IP3 Status: YD ND UN Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -084, 097

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UE-D N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uD- N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices,storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDI uDý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Reference:

IP3 SWEL 1-029 CrhI , nf A H,, ctanhcn V, ,on

ýAý ý Date: 10/22/12 PaulHuebsch _Date: 10/22/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-154 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3 IP3 Status: YO NO INU Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-034 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 73'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -084, 097 Photographs Note: no photos attached Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-155 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -045 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI UEi N/AE potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NWJ UEi N/A[]

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NEI Ul N/AL-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine IHall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-156 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: YE NEI UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location: Bldg. PA FloorEl. 41'-O" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -045

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NOI UI- N/A[D]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND UD N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

There is a considerable amount of water on the floor indicatingpotential leakage from piping in the area. CR-IP3-2012-3527 has been written to remedy this condition.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ ND UD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Several lights are out and need to be replaced. The florescent tube needs to be restrained.

CR-IP3-2012-03661has been written to remedy this condition.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-157 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEI URI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -045

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEIl UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012

.y.. ~(4~-

Paul Huebsch Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-158 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YZ NE] UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-035 Location: Bldg. PA Floor El. 41-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-045 Photographs Note: There is a considerableamount of water on Note:

the floor indicatingpotential leakage from piping in the area EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-159 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-001, 002 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YLI NO u-] N/A[-

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Nearby Unistruts for panels and stanchions for pipe supports show varying signs of advanced corrosion. CR-IP3-2012-03633has been written to remedy the condition for the stanchions.EC-38453 was generated to repairDPIC-1111 and DPIC-1113thru 1116 racks. EC-28998 was generatedfor the corroded IA supports.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NO UDl N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Nearby Unistruts for panels and stanchions for pipe supports show varying signs of advanced corrosion. CR-IP3-2012-03633 has been written to remedy this condition. EC-38453 was generatedfor the DPIC racks. EC-28998 was generated for the IA supports.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NEI UD- N/ADI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-160 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[ NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-001, 002

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI uD' N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The area has bargrating at the ceiling level and it is determined that the gratingis well secured to the support steel and not subject to displacement.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIZ NDI uDl N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uDl N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uDl N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-161 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-001, 002

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NWI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I=

1.- l

-f y

• f Ar h1,r

• LUuy h- V- Date: 10/23/2012 Pa*Jl Huieh.£c

ýAvý'2 Date: 10/23/2012 PaulHuebsch EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-162 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YN NEI UEI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -001, 002 Photographs Note: Anchor bolt for strainer(stainlesssteel) with Note: View of piping at strainer some corrosion of base angle.

Note: Scaffolding adjacentto strainerswith green Note: Corrosionat the base of a Unistrut column tag.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-163 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 1P3 Status: YE NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-036 Location: Bldg. IS Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-001. 002 Unistrut column which is beginning to tilt Note: i-ipe support stanchion showing Note: Gratingforming the ceilin!

considerablecorrosion well secured to the support steel EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-164 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 3 Status: YEZ NDI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-037 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 38'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UD1 N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI U-iD N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YEll NEI UDl N/AN raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Pump is in a pit with no HVAC or conduit raceways above.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area..

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD] N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-165 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YIZ NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-037 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 38'-6" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -032

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UI-I N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NDI UD- N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporaryinstallations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDI uD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

___ Date: 10/22/2012 Evaluantedl hv"

• ] ....

S£tnhe.

i* ..........

Yu~an Paul Huebsch Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-166 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE ND- UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-037 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 38-6" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 Photographs I I EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-167 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-038 Location: Bldg. PP Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: 1-036, 037 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NE] ULI N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE ND: UD- N/A[:

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NDJ UDJ N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-168 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-038 Location: Bldg. PP Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: 1-036, 037

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI U[i-- N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area..

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI UD:1 N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI ul N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appearsthat the areais free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-169 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-038 Location: Bldg. PP Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: 1-036, 037

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NF- UDl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/22/2012 PaulHuebsch Date: 10/22/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-170 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YIE NW-I UW--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-038 Location: Bldg. PP Floor El. 41'-O" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: 1-036, 037 Photographs Note: CH-MOV-441 AND 442 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-171 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 3 IP3 Status: YE Ni- UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-039 Location: Bldg. FB Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI ui- N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDI U[:] N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO ND uD N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI UO N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND u- N/AD--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-172 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 3 1P3 Status: Y[ NEI UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-039 Location: Bldg. FB Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-046

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI ULi N/AD:-

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uDl N/AD-interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND_ UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ceiling light bulb at the southeast comer of the room needs to be replaced. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03497.

Evaluated by: Maggie Farah A;CL ýý Date: 10/24/12 KaiLo /C 10/24/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-173 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 3 IP3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-039 Location: Bldg. FB Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -046 Photographs EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-174 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-040 Location: Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-O" Room, Area' FAN ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -047 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NEI UIl N/AD]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDl UD- N/ADl significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN NDJ UDJ N/AD]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Overhead duct is well supported nearthe south wall. Therefore, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-175 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP3 Status: Y0 NEI UFi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-040 Location: Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-0" Room, Area 1 FAN ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -047

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U-- N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIO NO uWl NIA-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y-I NM U[W N/A--

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed two unrestrainedladders on the floor, one by the north wall and the other by the south wall (see attachedphotos). Duringa seismic event the ladders may act as missile and strike the fans.

Observed a piping plug that is resting on the floor nearthe uncover pipe (see attachedphoto). During a seismic event the plug may act as a missile and strike the Exhaust Fans. In addition, debris may enterthe uncoveredpiping.

Observed an unrestrainedbroom stick on the north wall. During a seismic event the broom stick may act as a missile and strike the fans.

Observed a wheeled chair in the southeastcomer of the room by the door.During a seismic event the chair may dislodge and strike the fans.

The above items are addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03498.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-176 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: Y[ NMi U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-040 Location: Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-0" Room, Area1 FAN ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -047

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed broken glass in the east cornerof the room.

Observed bolts and nuts on the electrical box connected to the GAI-Tronics on the east wall by the door.

Flashingalong the north wall is deteriorated,broken and missing.

The above items are addressedin CR-IP3-2012-03498.

Reference:

IP3 SWELl-047 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah E Date: 1024/12 Kai Lo 10/24/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-177 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UFI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-040 Location: Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-0" Room, Area 1 FAN ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -047 Photographs u-vL. UIruiLrdiriufju IdUUur Uy (fluUUor di flne SUum comer of the room.

Note: Loose plug and unplugged p EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-178 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UWl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-040 Location: Bldg. ET Floor El. 46'-0" Room, Area1 FAN ROOM SWEL Components: SWELl -047 "lULU. Of UKU1 I y~i~i MI 111U UddL uumfWF Lit If I riULU; 10U(

DUILS dr/U FUri Of LP Of UWW"UGW LA IUF room. GAI-Tronics.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-179 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: YEE NO UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. FSB FloorEl. 41-0" RoomArea1 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UIl N/AD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEILUIE N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI UD- N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Platform and hatch are well supported; therefore, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduitraceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YIZ NEI U"- N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-180 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: Y[ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. FSB FloorEl. 41'-0" RoomArea 1 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NI UIE- N/AI-I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NI uSI N/A-i interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NE U-I N/AED interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes, it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NDI UDl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-181 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 1P3 Status: YE NEI Ui--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 41-0" Room, Area 1 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed a drain line that does not reach the floor drain at SEPC-32PP.The drain line stops approximately 1 foot away from the floor drain. This is addressed in CR-IP3-2012-03497.

Observed a bare cable that is attached to a conduit and runs up to a higher elevation (see attached photos).

The following observations are housekeeping:

Plastic bottle sitting on a beam (see attachedphoto), waste bags on the floor (see attached photos) and light bulbs is out. These items are documented in CR-IP3-2012-03497.

References IP3 SWEL2-002 and 2-003 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/2612 Maqqie Farah 10/26/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-182 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: Y; NEI UE]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 41'-0" Room, Area 1 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Photographs Note: bottle sitting on a beam Note: waste bad on the floor EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-183 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI Ur-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-041 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 41'-0" Room,Area1 SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Note: bare wire attached to a conduit Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039. Rev. 0, Page D-184 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P3 Status: YO NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-042 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NO UD- N/AD1 potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UDI N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NDi UD1 N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NO UDi N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescentlight bulbs above the heat Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger are not tied to the fixture. During a seismic event, the bulbs may become loose and strike the heat exchangergages. This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03497.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hlall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-185 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P3 Status: YO NEI U-i_

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-042 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-004

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI uLl N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEE NDI uD-- N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NO uD- N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Observed the following:

" Unrestrainedwaste bucket on top of a Boric Acid container east of the heat exchanger(see attachedphoto).

" Unrestrainedladders in a ladder rack (see attachedphoto)

" An unrestrainedheater with wheels and a power supplier device on a wheeled cart north of the heat exchanger(see attached photo).

" Unrestrainedcable and tools on top of the operations equipment cabinet at southwest end of the room (see attached photo).

During a seismic event the aforementioneditems may act as a missile and strike equipment. This is documented in CR IP3-2012-03497.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-186 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UI-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-042 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55"-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-004

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UJi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Observed several waste bags on the floor nearthe Sump Pump No. 312just north of the heat exchanger (see attachedphoto). This is documented in CR-IP3-2012-03497.

Reference:

SWEL2-004 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo /C. 6 10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-187 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-042 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Photographs Note: Waste bucket on top of a Boric Acid container Note: An unrestrainedhe Note: Unrestrainedcable and tools on top device on a wheeled cart operations equipment cabinet EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-188 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP3 Status: YE NF- U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-042 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 55"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Note: no photo attached.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-189 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP3 Status: Y[ NEI UL-J Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-043 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-005, 006. 007, 008, 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YM NEI U-- NIAD potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI U-- N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes, anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[Z NEI UiD N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes, based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine ]Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-190 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P3 Status: Y[ ND- UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-043 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-005, 006, 007, 008, 009

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI U[-I N/AD-I spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI uDl N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes, it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Fuel transfer loading is in process. Observed equipment and tools resting on the plafforms. This is judged to be acceptable since the equipment and tools are being used as part of fuel transferprocess and will likely to be removed after the fuel is transferred.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-191 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP3 Status: YE NEZ UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-043 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-005, 006, 007, 008, 009

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl uF--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

IP3 SWEL2-005, 2-006, 2-007, 2-008, 2-009 Evaluated by: Maggie Farah Date: 10/25/12 Kai Lo Ic 6 I,10/25/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page D-192 of 192 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP3 Status: YN NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-043 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL2-005, 006, 007, 008, 009 Photographs Note: no photos attached. Note:

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS Page E-1 of 13

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS pa-c E-2 of 13 SWCIAWC LICENSING BASIS LB # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN AWC-007 SWELl-012 SWEL1-018 CR Operability Review: This CR describes unsecured fluorescent bulbs on the 15' and 33' of the SWELl-018 control building. This is not a seismic good practice and needs to be corrected. However. no SWELI-019 Unrestrained fluorescent bulbs in the area. Durng a seismic Condition entered equipment is currently being impacted. In the event of a seismic event, if the bulbs fell out, they CR-IP3-2012-03123 N/A SWELl-069 event, the bulbs may become loose and strike nearby directly into CAP would break before damaging vital equipment such as static inverters and the 480V switchgear. It CLOSED SWELl-071 would cause a housekeeping concern, but they would not render required safety related SSC's SWELl-073 inoperable. Not reportable per SMM-LI--108.

SWELl-074 CR Action: Use tie wrap at each end to restrain the lighting tube.

The nitrogen tank at IA-PCV-817 is adequately supported at Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN N/A AWC003 the wall. However, the steel cap for the tank is loose on a wall Condition entered CR-IP3-2012-03128 channel behind the tank and could be displaced by a seismic directly into CAP CLOSED event and strike nearby equipment. CR Action: Either remove the cap or tie down the cap.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN Unistrut on masonry block wall 53B is missing an anchor. The CR Operability Review: The Unistrut supports tubing associated with the CCR A/C system. The N/A AWC-003 base of the Unistrut is supported with duct tape and the Condition entered Unistrut channel was evaluated and the seismic displacement is less than 1/16". Since the CR-IP3-2012-03129 Unistrut now has approximately 4 feet of unsupported directly into CAP displacement and stress are very small, there is no adverse seismic interaction. CCR A/C remains CLOSED cantilever. operable. Not reportable per SMM-LI--108.

CR Action: Remove the duct tape and no other action is needed. WO 00332487.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev. 0t ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS Page E-3 of 13 SWC/AWC LICENSING BASIS LB # # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review:

Panel (PID 08219) adjacent to the door: Unistrut legs Components in the Service Water Pump enclosure support Operability of Service Water per TS corroded and broken at the base. The toe plate at the 3.7.9. Per Engineering Input:

floor penetration between the Unistrut legs is loose and is not protecting the opening. 1. The sheet metal cabinet is a relatively soft compared to the Service Water Pumps, and will not damage the service water pumps during a seismic event.

Service Water Pumps Annubars has rotted out at the 2. The SW annubar cabinet is a relatively soft compared to the Service Water Pumps, and will not base. The panel lacks of lateral restraints and is free to damage the service water pumps during a seismic event.

displace laterally.

3. Electric heat trace cabinet 31 has steel angle clips that will hold the cabinet in place during a seismic event.

Piping grout penetration protection was found cracked and chipped at various locations allowing water seepage. 4. The floor grating will not lift up during a seismic event, and will not fall down on the Zum Strainers or panels.

Floor grating behind the electrical panels is not fixed to the structural steel and could displace laterally. In Inside the EHT Panel:

addition, this grating also serves as a support for conduits 1. The abraded cable is functioning properly and the abrading condition is no longer present. The CR-IP3-2012-03166 N/A AWC-010 Condition entered at the level below. Displacement of the grating would directly into CAP inner braided sheath is showing through the exterior, but no energized components are exposed. CLOSED affect the support for the conduits.

2. The contact for the Zum Pit heat trace is functioning properly at this time. and is not evidencing any performance degradation.

Observed a loose scaffold pole (on the floor) beneath a wall beam. During a seismic event the pole may act as a The water proofing grout is cracked as described. Any leakage through this connection will drain to missile and strike nearby equipment.

the SW Bay and will not flood any required SSC-related equipment. The connections from the power feed and through the floor pad are currently functioning as designed with no issues, and are above Electric Heat Trace Cabinet 31 has abraded cables at the the FSAR assumed flooding level of 15'.

top of the cabinet. The back of the cabinet is mildly corroded at the back/bottom. A box of bulbs is loose on CR Action: Notify FSS created WR 287292, 287293 & 287296 the inside of the cabinet. An unsecured tag is on a shelf

1. The cabinet (PID 8219) support needs to be repaired.

in the cabinet. A brown spot on the back of the cabinet may be the result of a burning effect due to high 2. Implement the EC to repair the anchorage for SW annubar cabinet.

temperature. Electrical needs to investigate. 3. Clip the grating panels and hook the grating to the support beam.

4. Remove the loose items for house keeping.

5. Remove old cracked and broken grout. Put a coating on the power feed and conduits and seal the penetration. Replace old, cracked grout with new ones is also an alternative.

Engineering Report No. [P-RPT-1 2-00031 Rev. 0 ATTACI-IMFNT F - POTENTIALLIY ABVFRSF £FISMIC CONDITIONS Pa~ fIi SWC/AWC LICENSING BASIS LICB# # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: This issue is a housekeeping concern and as such does not require a

• Observed a loose chain and a Unistrut on top of the detailed operability determination. The items of concern do not pose any type of fire loading concern.

RWST-31 foundation. and do not prevent access to the RWST. The items of concern are all made of metal or stone. The insulation straps were left over from previous work; all insulation is intact. Operations performed a N/A AWC-011 . Observed a rock resting on the RWST-31 stiffener ring. Condition entered walkdown / dean-up of the area and all objects described have been removed. This condition does CR-P3201203213 directly into CAP not meet the reportability requirements of SMM-LI-108. CLOSED

• Multiple piping insulation connections have been dislodged and held together by tape. CR Action: WRN 290099 & WRN 289342 Remove the steel chain, channel and rock immediately. Repair or provide strap at the loose insulation.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: ITS 3.8.7 requires the 2 SOLA Transformers that supply 34 Inst busses.

32 Inst Bus requires 32 Inverter only and does not address 32 BU SOLA Transformer. However 32 SWELl-018 The bolt pattern per drawing 9321-F-65013 is 10" x 10". The Condition entered BU SOLA transformer is FSAR equipment defined in Chapter 8 - Electrical Systems. Its function is measured bolt pattern is 8" x 10" on two base plates. No Sfield directly into CAP to back up the normal power supply to the 32 Instrument Busses. As mentioned in the CR the CR-IP3-2012-03229 SWELl-0g A bolt placement tolerance is indicated on the drawing. calculation 6604.221-CB-TS-001 has been revised to show that the as-found anchorage is acceptable. The SOLA Transformer remains functional at this time. This does not meet the reportability requirements of IP-SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: Update the drawing to show the as-built configuration.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: 32 ABFP Is currently INOPERABLE for maintenance activities. This

• Fluorescent bulb adjacent to 32 ABFP needs to be wire condition would not have rendered 32 ABFP INOPERABLE. There is no IP-SMM-LI-108 immediate restrained to light fixture. Condition entered reportability associated with this condition. CR-IP3-2012-03246 N/A SWELI-023 ntre CLOSEDn directly into CAP

• Observed tubing coming out of BFD-61-3 that is in contact with a U-Bolt that supports valve BFD-31. CR Action: WRN 289143, 291323 (1) The tubing coming out of BFD-61-3 to be re-routed to provide a 1" clearance from the U-bolt. WR initiated for this work.

(2) The fluorescent light bulb must be wrapped around tight. WR initiated for this work.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-1-00093 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS SWCIAWC LICENSING BASIS LaB# IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: As mentioned in the body of the CR, in the CB EL. 15', a Unistrut channel support for cable tray 34K has a connection flat plate (P1031) that is missing one bolt. The Cable tray 34K support against the north wall is missing a Condition entered connection plates in the vicinity all have a bolt at the middle hole, but this one does not. The tray has CR-IP3-2012-03281 in place. directly into CAP only 2 small cables on it. The estimated weight of the supported tray span is 2004. and the existing 2 CLOSED bolts have a minimum capacity of 20004. The existing condition is structurally adequate and acceptable as is. Therefore it remains operable. This is not reportable per IP-SMM-LI-108 CR Action: No further action is needed. The existing condition is structurally acceptable.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN Observed a not tightly secured metal wire trough located on CR Operability Review: Following discussion with engineering it was determined that the bolt in the east wall (above the speaker). The wire trough is attached two Unistruts channels with one Unistrut bolt on each channel question, although not fully engaged, is sufficient to hold the associated cables due to their light at the top. There is an approximately /" to 1" gap between weight and other supports in the area. Additionally, EN-OP-104 attachment 9.1 item 43 states that a CR-IP3-2012-03363 N/A AWC-019 the wire trough and the Unistrut. The wire trough seems to be Condition entered missing fastener on a cable tray is not an operability concern provided there are no more than two CLOSED light in weigh' however, durng a seismic event the trough directly into CAP missing or loose fasteners and no FME concern exists. There were no additional fasteners identified may dislodge and strike nearby equipment. The wire trough as loose or missing and no FME concern due to this issue. The associated cables supported by this should be properly secured to prevent any adverse seismic bracket therefore remain operable. This condition is not reportable per IP-SMM-LI-108.

conditions.

CR Action: WR 288466 was created to tighten the bolts behind the wire trough.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: MS-PCV-1310A and 1310B are steam supply valves to 32 AFW pump and are designed to shut on high temperature in the AFW pump room to protect the operability of 31 and The support has a horizontal tube at the base whereas 33 AFW pumps in the event of a steam break. As stated in the body of the CR, although the the design drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26 shows the drawings in Merlin do not reflect the actual plant configuration, the actual plant configuration was vertical steel continuing to the base plate. evaluated in ECN-02-3-023-001 and IP3-CALC-MS-03726. Additionally, due to the current N/A SWELl-035 - The vertical post is not concentric with the base plate as Condition entered configuration of the support for MS-H-1027-18-V. the spring support will only see a vertical CR-IP3-2012-03394 detailed on the design drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26. directly into CAP downward force and will therefore not cause tension or a shear force acting on the anchor bolts. The 4" distance will have no adverse effect, and is structurally acceptable. The operability of 1310A and

" The post is a tube steel section whereas the design 1310B are verified by performance of 3-PT-Q101 which was last completed on 9/19/12 under WO drawing 9321-L-60825, Sheet 26, shows a channel 52424550. The AFW system remains operable. This condition is not reportable per IP-SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: Configuration Management group should retrieve the original installation drawing from the ECN and project file, and update the current drawing because MERLIN does not have an image file of the as installed support.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT F - POTENTIALLIY ADVERSEF SEISMIC. CONDITIONS ATTAHMEN# ECW

- POTENTIALYF DVRE SENISMICN CONDITIOON LICENSING BASIS REOUTO Pa E-6ATUS1 Ls. CAW IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALATION RESOLUTION STATUS

1. CONCLUSION During a seismic event, the following observations have potential to act as a missile and strike nearby sensitive equipment:

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN

• Rack adjacent to Instrument Bus 31 has an unrestrained laptop and printer. CR Operability Review: This condition is not reportable per EN-LI-108. Condition is operable: items

• Boxes against the west wall on the floor, of concern are considered medium or light weight equipment and meet the requirements of IP-SMM-N/A AWC-015 . A box resting on top of a cabinet at the northwest Condition entered DC-910. CR-IP3-2012-03398 comer of the room. directly into CAP

• Three unrestrained binders on top of Hydrogen Recombiner No. 31 Control Panel. CR Action: Created WR 00288705 to install a vertical barrier on top of the work station, between the

• Unrestrained phones, printers and monitors at the equipment and the control work station to prevent loose objects from travelling toward the equipment work stations, in a seismic event.

• Unsecured speaker on top of 34 Control Room Supplemental Cooler along the south wall.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: This CR describes unsecured fluorescent bulbs on various elevations of AWC-012 Fluorescent light bulbs in the area need to be secured the Aux boiler feed pump building. This is not a seismic good practice and needs to be corrected.

to the light fixtures. However, no equipment is currently being impacted. In the event of a seismic event, if the bulbs fell N/A NA AWC-016 AWC-014 *The AWC-012 area has a bucket on the floor which is Condition entered directly into CAP out, they would break before damaging vital equipment in the area. It would cause a housekeeping CR-LP3-2012-03462 COE AWC-016 nt TesAWCned2 which isr area atoolbucketonxthe d y i concern, but they would not render required safety related SSC's inoperable. The unsecured tool AWC-017 not restrained and a tool box which is not secured. box and bucket are already on the floor and would not impact any important components on the aux feed pumps. Not reportable per SMM-LI-108.

CR Action: WR 289193 generated for restraining the fluorescent light bulbs

• AWC -017: Floor grating is not attached to the steel Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN support beams. Most grating is restrained laterally by the pipe supports and the wall on the opposite side.

However some panels are only restrained by the wall CR Operability Review: This CR describes multiple cases of floor grating that is not secured and could displace laterally under seismic action. properly with grating dips. As described in the CR and per discussion with engineering there is no AWC-017 Adjacent panels cannot restrain the loose panels operability concern. The interaction between the grating and the required valves would be N/A because the toe board is not continuous but is Condition entered insignificant if the grating was to be moved by a seismic event. As mentioned in the CR the sections CR-IP3-2012-03473 AWC-016 attached to each individual panel. They could then directly into CAP of grating are equivalent to I foot of piping which is not significant enough to render damage to the impact the main steam lines. valves that would cause them to be inoperable. As stated, MS-45-6 and MS-1-31 remain operable at

• AWC-016: Some sections of grating are not attached this time. This is not reportable per IP-SMM-LI-108.

to the steel beam below.

CR Action: WR 289232 is generated.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTA fl-JNAFMl:T [: -- PflITFi;TIAI I V Arfl\/[:FDCF[: CF:IC&FAIr"' 'l'Wfl'\fITllIC*II SWC/AWC LICENSING BASIS LB # # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS

1. E CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN AWC-0252 Fluorescent tubns need to be restrained for all noted CR Operability Review: The CR describes a seismic good practice and does not directly impact the equipment in the PAB. The improperly secured bulbs are softer than the equipment they would N/A SWELI- AWC-022: Observed a broken fluorescent light fixture Condition entered impact and the bulbs would break before damaging any of the potentially impacted equipment such CR-IP3-2012-03481 SWELl-011 directly above CS Pump 32. The fixture is tied in the directly into CAP as the MCC's. charging pumps, Boric Acid transfer pumps. CCW pumps and surge tanks. CLOSED SWELl-025 center (with rope or zip tie) but loose at the north end. Equipment in the PAB is operable. Not reportable per SMM-LI--108.

During a seismic event the fixture may fall and strike the oil reservoir or any sensitive equipment.

CR Action: WR 00289354 is generated to restrain the fluorescent light tubes at the locations described above and to replace a slightly damaged light fixture above 32CSP.

• Fluorescent light bulbs above the heat Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger are not tied to the fixture. During a seismic event, the bulbs may become loose and strike the heat exchanger gages. Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN

• Unrestrained waste bucket on top of a Boric Acid container east of the heat exchanger. CR Operability Review: The housekeeping issues described in this condition report do not affect N/A AWC-042

• Unrestrained ladders in a ladder rack. Condition entered the functionality of surrounding equipment in the Fuel Storage Building. This condition is not CR-IP3-2012-03497 directly into CAP reportable per IP-SMM-LI-108.

• An unrestrained heater with wheels and a power supplier device on a wheeled cart north of the heat CR Action: WR 289541 generated to restrain the fluorescent light tube to the light fixture, and the exchanger. housekeeping issues.

• Unrestrained cable and tools on top of the operations equipment cabinet at southwest end of the room.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-011039 Rev. I)

Al IATT HMEN I " - U I -ENI ALLY AUVERSE SI-SMIC COUNI I IUNS Page E-8 of 13 SWC/AWC LICENSING BASIS LB # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS CONCLUSION

• Observed two unrestrained ladders on the floor, one by the north wall and the other by the south wall.

During a seismic event the ladders may act as missile and strike the fans.

• Observed a piping plug that is resting on the floor near the uncover pipe. During a seismic event the plug may act as a missile and strike the Exhaust Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN Fans. In addition, debris may enter the uncovered piping. CR Operability Review: The housekeeping issues described in this condition report do not affect N/A AWC-040 Condition entered the functionality of surrounding equipment in the Electrical Tunnel. This condition is not reportable CR-IP3-2012-03498

• Observed an unrestrained broom stick on the north directly into CAP wall. During a seismic event the broom stick may act per IP-SMM-LI-108.

as a missile and strike the fans.

• Observed a wheeled chair in the southeast corner of CR Action: WR 289548 generated for the unrestrained items and housekeeping issues.

the room by the door. During a seismic event the chair may dislodge and strike the fans.

• Observed bolts and nuts on the electrical box connected to the GAI-Tronics on the east wall by the door.

• Control panels TWS#31. #32 and #33 - all nuts on the base plates are heavily corroded with substantial loss of cross section. TWS #34, #35 and #36 are less corroded but also exhibit considerable loss of cross section. Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN

• The base plate of Unistrut column supporting conduits has 3 out of 4 anchor bolts missing. The nuts on the opposite base plate are heavily corroded. CR Operability Review: As noted by the originator none of the mentioned items effect safety related systems or seismic structures. They are systems in the CLB and thus must be functional.

N SCWP panel base plate has corroded nuts and the Condition entered The missing/corroded bolts do not affect the functionality of the equipment. Allequipment mentioned NA AWC-009 panel adjacent to TWS #34 is missing an anchor bolt directly into CAP remains in service and thus remains functional. This is not reportable per Li-108. CR-P3-2012-03640 in its base plate.

• The Common Alarm Panel adjacent to the cabinet CR Action: WR 00290621 is generated to repair/replace the corroded anchorage and missing has padlocks hanging loose on Unistruts. anchor bolts for item 1, 2 & 3 in the condition description section.

WR 00290622 was generated to repair the leaking pipe in item 4.

• Leaking pipe near Screen Wash around column line 18 that was covered with a plastic to prevent water from spreading.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-000139 Rev. (0 ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS PaNe E-9 of 13 SWCIAWC LICENSING BASIS LB # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS

1. CONCLUSION

• AWC-029: Unsecured cart found in the area.

• AWC-029: Loose part found in the area near EBR PAB AWC-023: Observed tools, cables, parts resting on top of the CCW tank.

AWC-023: Observed two buckets (collecting drips) at 32 CCW pump AWC-023: Observed a bucket (with wheels) and mop Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN stick near the hot water heater near Sump Pump 37.

AWC-029 CR Operability Review: The housekeeping issues described in this condition report do not affect AWC-023 *AWC-023: Observed hoses coming out of CCW tank N/A that are laid over piping, piping supports and ducts Condition entered the operability or functionality of surrounding equipment in the PAB. This condition is not reportable CR-IP3-2012-03501 AWC-031 that are not tied down. The ends of two hoses seem directly into CAP per IP-SMM-LI-108.

SWELl-026 to CCW travel to an upper elevation connecting to another tank. Another hose is resting on top of a pipe near SWN-32. CR Action: WR 00289563 is generated for general housekeeping items. WR 00289564 is generated to restrain various items for good seismic housekeeping practice.

• AWC-023: Observed a ladder near the Appendix R safe shutdown ladder that is not restrained.

• AWC-031: Observed a brush, tape and a filter resting, unrestrained on a shelf located on the south wall of the room between SI Pumps 31 and 32. During a seismic event these items may dislodge or act as missile and strike nearby components.

• SWELl-026: Loose parts in the area need to be removed.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: This condition does not meet the reporting cntena of SMM-LI-108. The area was evaluated for nearby equipment that may be affected. The Heat Trace Panel, Ducting and the Hot Water tank have no safety related equipment within the height radius of the equipment.

There is a hot water heater adjacent to the concrete column Therefore, based on the input from the engineer no operability condition exists.

N/A AWC-025 near Boric Acid Tank 31 which does not have any apparent Condition entered CR-IP3-2012-03595 anchoage.directly into CAP anchorage .

CR Action:

WR. 00290332 was generated to repair/replace the anchorage of the Electric Heat Tracing support.

WR 00290333 was generated to repair the seam joint to provide a permanent fix.

WR 00290334 was generated to restrain the heater by means of tying the heater to the column with a steel chain.

Engineering Report No. tP-RPT-12-00039 Rev. 0 AI I I 0--U EU-MIN I INTIALLY I AUVERSE SEISMIC COUNUI I OUN Page E-1O of 13 SWCIAWC LICENSING BASIS LB # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS

1. CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review:

The condition described in this CR has been previously evaluated in CR-IP3-2012-00673. From that CR: DP-1113 and 1116 are differential pressure switches for the 33 and 36 Zum strainers respectively. After walkdown Civil Engineering provided the following operability input:

"Anchor bolt hex nuts on DP-1116 (SWP36) and DP-1113 (SWP33) have loss of metal resulted from corrosion. At the anchorage of DP-1116 rack, the southwest nut has 50% loss of metal and the southeast nut has 30% loss. At the anchorage of DP-1113 rack, the southwest nut has 5% loss of N/A AWC-036 Nearby Unistruts for panels and stanchions for pipe supports Condition entered metal and the southeast nut has 10% loss. Calculation IP-CALC-12-00019 is generated to evaluate show varying signs of advanced corrosions directly into CAP the nut/bolt deficiency. The DP-1 116 and DP-1 113 support is operable with the defective nuts based CR-IP3-2012-03633 on the calculation by treating one nut as ineffective to resist tension in a seismic event. Allthe nuts on these two supports must be replaced at the next scheduled PM time for the piping system and coated to prevent future degradation."

The degradation seen on the other pressure switches is not as severe as that seen on DP-i 113 and DP-1116, Therefore the service water system remains operable. The second half of the CR describes a condition on the non-seismic portion of the SW pump, since these supports only have to handle dead weight, this part of the system isn't in danger of failing and thus the operability of the Service water system isn't impacted. These events are not reportable per Li-108.

CR Action: WR 00290612 is generated to replace the anchor bolts and the base plates.

Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN Ftuorscent bulb directly above ACAPPWI that is not secured CR Operability Review: The fluorescent lamp tube may come loose during a seismic event and N/A SWEL2-001 to the light fixture. During a seismic event the bulb may fall Condition entered strike nearby equipment. The fluorescent tube, however, is a soft missile object compared to the CR-IP3-2012-03653 and strike the pump's oil reservoir or nearby equipment. directly into CAP plant equipment in the vicinity of the lamp. Nearby equipment- Monitor Tank Pumps. PW Pumps, and RWST Purification pumps are FUNCTIONAL.

CR Action: WR 00290685 is generated to secure the lighting tube to the fixture.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0I ATTACHMENT E - POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS Po~e E-IlI of 13 SWCIAWC LICENSING BASIS LB # IDENTIFIED CONDITION EVALUATION RESOLUTION STATUS

1. _ CONCLUSION Initial Action: CR GENERATED - SEE STATUS COLUMN CR Operability Review: MCC-34 supports Functionality of various SSC-related equipment. The A hood above the cabinet is resting on a water pipe.

Cable Tray is currently loaded to half it's capacity (1800 lbs of 3600 lbs capacity), which is sufficient The original supports are no longer there. At the opposite end, the hood is supported on chains to an to withstand seismic loads without dislodging the cable tray. The sheet metal hood is estimated to upper elevation. SQUG indicated that the hood is weigh less than 600 lbs, is restrained vertically to the cable tray. and would be supported by the adequately supported. It does not appear to be Condition entered cable tray should it fall onto the cable tray. The piping in the vicinity of the MCC is welded vice CR-IP3-2012-03656 N/A SWELl-007 adequately supported at this time. directly into CAP screw-type connections, and determined not to be an Operability issue per Engineering. MCC-34 is FUNCTIONAL.

Piping above and adjacent to the cabinet does not appear to be seismically supported. This includes both water and fire water lines. CR Action: WR 00290777 is generated to support the hood with 4 chains from above. Relocate the breaker that provides safety related function to another MCC, i.e. inside the Control Building, or provide a structure housing for the MCC, protecting it from seismic interaction impact or water spraying onto it.

Engineering Report No. lP-RPT- 12-0(0039 Rev. 0 pMiIfIrlmlVl-I I MO

- n I EZI I IMLLT M1JV 'ZrOZO*iIOiVII, i.UINIUI I IJIINO rage -I- of I LB # SWCUAWC IDENTIFIED CONDITION LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION CONCLUSION RESOLUTION STATUS A 3/8" tubing inside a Unistrut channel that has a cantilever Tubing stress caused by the Unistrut channel displacement CR-IP3-2012-03246 LB-01 SWELl-086 length of 69". The tubing is coming from P1-1445 in the back N/A of panel AFWP32-LOC-PNL. loading is within the allowable stress limit.

The generator base has 3 bolt holes on each side, but there are only 2 bolts with empty hole in the middle. The drawing The stress interaction for the 5/8" steel bolts between the SWELl-059 lP3V-144-5.1-O0o2 does not show the bolt and spacing generator's base and steel frame is lens than the acceptable N/A SWEL1-060 information for the connection between the generator and its limit.

steel frame. Per walkdown, the bolts are 5/8" diameter and 27.5" spacing for both directions.

There is 1" between the Battery Charger 34 and the adjacent The total seismic displacement of the two items is 0.46", less LB-03 SWEL1-072 P1001 frame. Determine if 1" is adequate for seismic than 1" provided. N/A interaction between the two items.

The Hilti Bolt is evaluated for the 1" deep chipped concrete N/A CR-IP3-2012-03284 LB-04 SWELl-070 There is a 1" deep, 4"x4" chipped concrete next to a W" Hilti Bolt with 3.25" embedment effect, the bolt still has allowable load factor greater than 1.0.

AWC-019 The base plate for the pipe support PS-AI-1 & Al-2 has a The combined normal stress interaction induced by the bending stress resulted from the gap and the tensile stress N/A CR-IP3-2012-03361 AWC-021 g atof W the olt. was evaluated for SSE loading condition and found to be less B-2 bending stress at the " Hilti bolt, than 1.0.

1. The jacket water cooler pipe is in contact with the 1. There is no adverse seismic interaction.

lube oil pipe. 1. N/A LB-06 SWELl-076 2. There is no adverse seismic interaction. CR-IP3-2012-03361

2. Angle iron for support of P1-1561 tubing is in contact 2. WR 288457 with tubing for DF-23-1, P1-1375.

LB-07 SWELI-096 There are two saddles supporting the tank. each with 4 bolts. Two bolts without nuts are acceptable. The stress interaction WR 288554 CR-IP3-2012-03382 Two of 4 bolts on the north saddle are missing nuts. is still less than 1.

Observed a tight crack passing through a bolt for a fire The fire protection pipe support is acceptable because the LB-08 SWELl-076 protection support at the southeast corner of the room. Hilti expansion anchor is based on a safety factor of 4 that N/A accounts for tight crack in concrete.

LB-09 AWC-014 2" conduit has an estimated 16 feet span length Conduit stress is below the allowable limit. N/A CR-IP3-2012-03457 LB-1O SWEL1-054 Unistrut channel tube track has 48" cantilever length with a Stress & deflection of Unistrut is very small. Stress resulted N/A CR-IP3-2012-03129 tubing from any seismic interaction will be insignificant.

LB-li SWELl-095 Determine the seismic interaction between the light pole and Seismic induced bending moment is less than the design N/A the CST moment of the foundation. Light pole will not impact the CST.

LB-12 AWC-028 Camera pole baseplate has no anchor bolt Camera support cannot overturn, but a higher safety factor is WR 290084 is generated to restrain the support to this CR-IP3-2012-03565 desirable, handrail.

LB-13 AWC-027 A 4" liquid waste disposal pipe with 25 to 30' span The stress of the piping system is well within the allowed N/A stress limit per B31.1 code.

LB-14 AWC-032 A 1.5" (1.9"OD) hot water pipe has 15' long span The stress of the piping system is well within the allowed N/A stress limit per B31.1 code.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev. (0 All AHMI-MN I E - OT- TI ALLY ADVERiSE SEIS-MIlC CUNUI I IONS Page E- 13 of 13 SWCAWC Wil IDENTIIED CONDTON LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION CONCLUSION RESOLUTION STATUS LB-15 AWC-033 PVC pipe is supported at 12' span with a zip lie restraint The PCV pipe stress is less than the allowable stress limit. Install a pipe clamp at the tie wrap location. WR 290228 CR-IP3-2012-03583 approximately 3 feet from the duct end.

There is a concrete crack on the wall passing through a Original expansion anchor design with a safety factor of 4 LB-16 AWC.002 conduit support anchor bolt. The support has a %" and a 2" covers crack width of 10mm to 20mm per EPRI N/A conduit on it. recommendation.

LB-17 AWC-012 PWR-599 has 4 anchor bolts instead of 6 bolts Stress interaction is still less than I Update drawing to show 4 bolts pattern CR-IP3-2012-03580 LB-18 AWC-012 1"FP sprinkler pipe is I* from the conduit. Combined seismic displacement is 0.101' < 11provided. N/A LB-19 AWC-025 Electric heat tracing cabinet base anchorage corrosion Treating the anchor as 1/1. the stress interaction is less than Replace/repair corroded anchorage. WR 290332 CR-1P3-2012-03595 1.0.

LB-20 SWELl-045 PAB supply fan's anchor bolts have more than mild corrosion The corroded expansion anchors are structurally adequate, Replaceirepair corroded anchorage. WR 290582 CR-IP3-2012-03624 atthe wall side. stress interaction is less than 1 based on SF=4.0 Prepared by: Kai Lo

,/c6(ý Date: //2. /

Reviewed by: Richard Drake Date: ,/ZO/Z-Peer tow earn Member

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 Page F-I of 55 ATTACHMENT F - LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORM

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-2 of 55 ATrACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form a6 LB Evaluation No. Z6,- o0 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-G2-3 Equipment ID No. 32ABFP Equip. Class 5 Equipment Description 32 Auxiliary Boiler Feed Pump Location: Bldg. AFPB Floor El. 18'-6 Room, Area Pump room Condition During the walkdown, NRC inspector observed a 3/8" tubing inside a Unistrut channel that has a cantilever length of 69". The tubing is coming from P1-1445 in the back of panel AFWP32-LOC-PNL.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this tubing was found.

Licensing Basis Tubing providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically. The tubing support must be designed seismically. Both the tubing and support stress must be designed to the B31.1 and AISC codes and standards.

Evaluation The tubing is supported by the Unistrut channel. Since the channel has a long cantilever, the stress, displacement for the channel, and the channel induced displacement load onto the tubing need to be evaluated.

A new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: [ Yes [I No Prepared by: Kai Lo __ Date 10-17-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: 4(h7Lý1LVX Date /0 (7/1 Peer Revievr EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-3 of 55 SWEL1 -02'a0-k(

L = cantilever length of Unistrut channel = 69 in w = uniform weight of Unistrut channel = 1.9 plf = 0.1 .583 l/in Use w = 0.18 #/in cons . to include weight of tube S = min. section modulus = 0.203 in3 I = min. moment of inertia = 0.186 in4 E = modulus of elasticity = 2.90E+07 psi At AFB building EL. 18'-6, use shield wall 0.5% damping response spectrum Gh = peak horizontal acceleration = 0.64 Gv =(2/3)Gh = 0.427 2

Gr = resultant of acceleration = [2Gh + (1+Gv) 21]- = 1.69 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 1.50 2

M = bending moment = wL /2 = 428.5 in-lb fb = bending stress = MRM(Gr)(M/S) = 5349 psi < 1.33(25000) 33250 psi, o.k.

Check deflection d = deflection = MRM(Gr)[wL 4/(8EI)] = 0.240 inch S, = section modulus of tubing = .0.00423 in3 in 60A Z 1,= moment of inertia of tubing = S,(0.5x0.375) = 0.0007931 in4 For a simple support beam with force at mid-span, length = 60 in 2

M = 12EItd/L fb = M/St = 12E],d/(SL 2 ) = 4343 psi << 1.8(15000p! si) = 27000psi Since the seismic displacement is small, any tubing stress resulted from the 0.24" forced displacement loading on a flexible tubing system will not be significant.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-4 of 55 ATrACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-02 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-059 & 060 Equipment ID No. 31MGS-COUP, 32MGS-COUP Equip. Class 13 Equipment Description 31 & 32 Rod Control Motor Generator Set (31 & 32 MG Set)

Location: Bldg. ýB Floor El. 33'-0 Room, Area Condition The generator base has 3 bolt holes on each side, but there are only 2 bolts with empty hole in the middle. The drawing IP3V-144-5.1-0002 does not show the bolt and spacing information for the connection between the generator and its steel frame. Per walkdown, the bolts are 5/8" diameter and 27.5" spacing for both directions.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this connection bolting was found. No SQUG calculation.

Licensinq Basis Equipment providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically to be functional and II over I seismic interaction.

Evaluation A new evaluation is performed on the next page. The evaluation is for the 5/8" bolts between the generator's base and the steel frame.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes [-] No Prepared by: Kai Lo da ý Date 10-17-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: 1 Date IA//_161.1 e.4r Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-5 of 55

~5h-/e'e 2 o .

SWEL NO. 59 & 60 Check bolt between generator and frame, 4 bolt spaced at 27.5" both way.

Building : CB EL. 33' Gh = horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.69 Gv vertical seismic acceleration = 2/3(Gh) = 0.46 max vertical acceleration = 1 - Gv = 0.54 (downward)

W'= weight of MG set including the motor = 7680 lb w = weight of steel frame & motor = 2500 lb estimated W = weight of generator = W'- w = 5180 lb e = vertical eccentricity = 20 inch Mx = Mz = W(Gh)e = 71484 in-lb Fx = Fz = W(Gh) = 3574 lb Fy =W(1 - Gv) = 2797 lb s = bolt spacing = 27.5 inch in both direction n = number of bolts = 4, T = tension = Mx/(2s) + Mz/(2s) - Fy/n = 1900 lb V = [Fx 2 + Fz2 0 5/n = 1264 lb D = bolt diameter = 0.6215A... inch, field walkdown 2

As = tensile area = 0.226 in 2

Ar = root area = 0.207 in Ft = allow tensile stress = .20.000 psi Fv = allow shear stress = 10000 psi Ta = allow tension = Ft(As) = 4520 lb Va = allow shear = Fv(Ar) = 2070 lb interaction = T/Ta + V/Va = 1.03 lb < 1.33 for seismic load

L.SELF SWPOOPfTINO IL&SR COFJSTOWU~TON.

6OCATIOP4 WTAk.JOwo LOCATIOFJ 1 ITON M.G. SET ARWNCDENY WTTW CtDlIl.W 60.&-b N6bStSb V9.01 v,~ V#EW 22.70 m

=5 CD FOR I II &qw (D

0 z

E EINACCISSUE Z PL O Pa-IbGS MC-20-t1.aP 1_p.7 9321 RIY..QGQOATE opS-351A..

LQI1LQ. I1mM7 2 Mo'ED FOR ORSOUND LI.

0 AOPQON. WT 7*40 LOS C.,

CD 0

CD T1 a) 0 U,

Ln

F-7 of 55 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-03 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-072 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 34 Equip. Class 16 Equipment Description Battery Charger Location: Bldg. CQB Floor El. 33'-0 Room, Area Condition There is a Unistrut (P1001) frame with two Unistrut columns on both sides of the Battery Charger cabinet with approximately 1" of clearance.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis SSC providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically and free from adverse seismic interaction.

Evaluation The seismic displacement of the Battery Charger and the Unistrut column are determined and added together to see if it is less than the 1" provided.

The evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes 0 No Kai Lo e. /

Prepared by: Date 10-19-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Joe Ruch Date 10-22-2012 Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-8 of 55 SWELI-072 Determine if 1" clearance between Battery Charger 34 and P1001 support frame is adequate Determine the seismic displacement for Battery Charger:

f = 1st mode frequency = 8.0 Hz based on EPRI TR-102180 g = gravitation constant = 386.4 A = peak spectral acceleration based on 5% damping 0.344 at CB EL. 33', 5% damping is recommended by SQUG 2

dl = seismic displacement = g/[2 7f ] = 0.331 inch based on 1g Determine the seismic displacement at the P1001 conduit support frame The frame is an intermediate support for a P1001 beam span across the entire room For concentrated mass at top of the fix-guided beam: P - guide P = weight of 16 of P1001 lump mass at top of frame = 60.8 lb L = length of vertical P1001 = 90 in x= distance bet. P1001 beam to top of charger 30 in 90 E = modulus of elasticity = 27900000 psi 60 1= moment of inertia of P1001= 0.93 in fix Based on a condition of fixed at bottom and guided at top(P1001 is perpendicular to this frame):

d2 =seismic disp = P(L - x) 2((L + 2x)/(12EI) = 0.105 inch based on Ig For uniform weight along the entire fix-guided beam:

w = uniform weight of P1001 = 0.317 #/in 2 2 d3 = seismic displacement = w(L - x2) /(24EI) = 2.6E-02 inch based on 1g d = total seismic displacement = dl+d2+d3 = 4.6E-01 inch < 1 inch, o.k. for seismic interaction EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-9 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-04 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-070 Equipment ID No. BATT CHGR 32 Equip. Class 16 Equipment Description Battery Charger Location: Bldg. OB Floor El. 33'-0 Room, Area Condition The floor is chipped out in the immediate vicinity of one Hilti bolt. The depth of the concrete removal is approximately one inch and extends to the anchor bolt.

Documents Reviewed Seismic evaluation work sheet (SEWS) for 32CHGR.

SQUG anchorage evaluation for 31CHGR that this battery charger referenced.

Licensing Basis SSC providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically.

Evaluation Ioad. #

The 34" Hilti bolt still maintains an allowable belt factor that is greater than 1.0.

The evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: 0 Yes EI No Prepared by: Kai Lo 649 Date 10-19-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Dan Nuta Date 10-19-2012 Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-10 of 55 s4-rr 2- &F 2_.

SWELl-070 A 1" deep, 4"x4" chip concrete area adjacent to Hilti bolt approx. 1" deep, 4" x 4" chipped concrete The 1" deep concrete chipped area is conservatively treated to cover 35% of the shear cone area for a 3.25" embedment expansion bolt. The 1" deep, chipped area still has capacity and can be considered as 35% of a shear cone area of a (3.25"-1") = 2.25" embedment anchor.

Al = 65% of the shear cone area for 3.25" emb = 0.65(i[(3.25)2] = 21.57 in2 in2 2

A2 = 35% of the shear cone area for 2.25" emb = 0.35[7c(2.25) ] = 5.57 in2 A = total shear cone area accounting for the 1"chipped area = A1+A2 = 27.14 A' = original designed shear cone area based on 3.25" emb = 7t(3.25)' = 33.18 inL For shallow embeded (3.5")Hilti bolt, the tensile and shear capacity is governed by concrete.

Since the tensile and shear capacity of the anchor bolt based on concrete is a function of the shear cone, A capacity reduction factor can be obtained by ratio of the new to orignal shear cone area.

Capacity reduction factor = A/A' = 0.818 From SQUG evaluation minimum (allowable) load factor = 1.85 > 1.0, o.k.

new minimum (allowable) load factor = 1.51 > 1.0, o.k.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-11 of 55

)W51,v'Lj 0NYPA-INDIANPOINTUNIT3 Status A)Y OY Q.a0 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 1 of 3

,.... Equip. ID No. 31CHGR Equip. Class 16- Battery Charaers & Inverters

• . Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 31 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 233' Room Row/Col Manufacturer. Model. Etc. (Optional but recommended)

SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 33'-0"

2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40' from grade y

3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz NA

4. Capacity based on: Existing Documentation DOC ABS Bounding Spectrum BS 1.5 X Bounding Spectrum ABS GERS GERS

5. Demand based on: Ground Response Spectrum GRS 1.5 X Ground Response Spectrum AGS Conserv. Des. In-Str. Resp Spec. CRS Realistic M-Ctr. In-Str. Resp. Spec. RRS Does capacity exceed demand? (Indicate at right (*) and in fjT y, if a special exception to enveloping of seismic demand spectrum is invoked per Section 4.2 of the GIP.)

CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below)

1. Equipment is included in earthquake experience class Y

2. Solid State Type y

3. For floor-mounted, transformer positively anchored and mounted Y near base, or load path is evaluated

4. Base assembly of floor-mounted unit properly braced or stiffened y for lateral forces

5. For wall-mounted units, transformer supports and bracing provide adequate load path to the rear cabinet wall

6. All latches and fasteners in doors secured Y

7. Anchorage adequate (See checklist below for details) Y

8. Relays mounted on equipment evaluated Y

9. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concern? Y Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum? Y CAVEATS - GERS (Identify with an asterisk (*) those caveats which are met by intent without meeting the specific wording of the caveat rule and explain the reason for this conclusion in the COMMENTS section below) 7 .,_

1. Equipment is included in generic seismic testing equipment class

2. Meets all Bounding Spectrum caveats (9((Ji 3 Silicon-Controlled Rectifier (SCR) power controls; wall- or floor-mounted NIEMA-type enclosure 7

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-12 of 55 NYPA - INDIAN POINT UNIT 3 Status 4.2Y 0 O U SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 2 of 3 Equip. IDNo. 31 CHGR Equip. Class 16- Battery Charaers- & Inverters Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 31

4. Within range of battery/.4,. charger ratings: &A d.4o, A-,14 YC1 ,"

/-.'--

24-250 VDC / _k7 Vbe- \1 J f 120-A80 VAC z-q,0 VA. y 25-600 amps mi.

150-2850 pounds (floor-m-runted) 150-600 pounds (wall-mounted) j,-

(?/

5. Within range of inverter ratings: VA 120 VDC only 120-480 VAC 0.5-15 KVA to 300-2000 pounds

6. Heavy components are located in lower half of cabinet and are supported from base or rear panel with no panel cutouts adjacent to attachment Is the intent of all the caveats met for GERS?

ANCHORAGE

1. Appropriate equipment characteristics determined ( mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation) I

2. Type of anchorage covered by the GIP Y

3. Sizes and locations of anchors determined Y

4. Anchorage installation adequate, e.g., weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness I

5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety considered: Y_

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/

condition, and concrete cracking

6. For bolted anchorages, gap under base less than 1/4 inch Y

7. Factors affecting essential relays considered: gap under base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors Y

8. Base has adequate stiffness and effect of prying action on anchors Y considered

9. Strength of equipment base and load path to CG adequate Y

10. Embedded steel, grout pad or large concrete pad adequacy evaluated Are anchorage requirements met? Y INTERACTION EFFECTS Y

1. Soft target free from impact by nearby equipment or structures

2. If equipment contains sensitive relays, equipment free from all impact by Y

nearby equipment or structures

3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Y

4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse

5. Have you looked for and found no other adverse concerns? Y Is equipment free of interaction effects? Y_

IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE?

EnT ineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-13 of 55 NYPA-INDIAN POINT UNIT 3 Status c4 Y Q0 -. _ .

SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 3 Equip. ID No. 31 CHGR Equip. Class 16- Battery Chargers & Inverters-Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 31 CMMENTS REFERENCE DRAWINGS: IP3V-156-5.8-0001, REV. 4 AND 9321-F-30523, REV. 36.

Overall dimension is 76(H)X58(W)X30(D).

Weight is based on GIP recommendation, table C.1-1, of 45 lbs/cubic ft.

Location of C.G. is X=29, Y=-10, Z=42.

Spectral acceleration is for CB building, Elev. 33' at 5% damping, SPA = 0.34g all directions.

Anchorage evaluation is based on 4-3/4" dia. Hilti Kwik Bolts.

) Evaluated by: Date:

>16-1'

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-14 of 55 N1'PA - iilian Point Unit 3 BCIIARG31.DOC I

EariflqUake Response Spectrum: User Frequency : User - 8.00 Damping: User - 5.00 Spectral Values :

Direction Acceleration (g's)

North - South 0.34 East - West 0.34 Vertical 0.34 Angle.: 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS Weights :

Number of Weights: 1 No Weight X Y Z 1 3.80E+003 2.90E+001 -1.00E+001 4.20E+001 Forme o Number of Forces: 0 Moments :

Number of Moments: 0 Allowables Anchor:

Number of Anchor types: I I

Fension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf oDia 1 3/4 Manufact Hiltd -I--Product Kwik-Bolt Tension 4690.00 Shear 5480.00 Coeff 1.00 Coeff 0.30 Fact 1.00 (N)

Concrete

• Ultimate Stress: 3000.00 psi.

Reduction Factor: 0.85

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-15 of 55 N YPA - indli*n Point Unit 3 ICI IA RG3 IDOC 2

Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.

uroSurfaces Number of Surfaces:* 1 Direction Direction I

~1-~ Direction 4' 4:

Comp Comp Comp No Nx Nz I 0.00E+000 0.00E4000 1.OOE+000 I Anchor Pattern for Surface # 1 Y

ý_ x Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchors:

Concrete Lines:

Concrete Points :

Weld Lines

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-16 of 55 NYPA - Indian Point Uilit 3 BCH.ARG31.DOC 3

Anchor:

Number of Anchors : 4 Anch X Y Z Surf No. Id Coord Coord Coord Id 1 1 4.OOE+000 -2.40E+001 (.00E+000 1 2 1 5.45E+001 -2.40E+001 0.OOE+000 1 3 1 5.45E+001 -6.OOE+000 0.OOE+000 1 4 1 4.OOE+000 I -6.00E+000 0.00E+000 1

_QoncrteLines

1. of elements per line : 4 Number of Concrete Lines: 3 Start Start Start End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord Id Width 1 3.50E+000 -4.OOE+000 0.00E+000 3.50E+000 -2.60E+001 0.OOE+000 1 3.00E+000 2 5.45E+001 -4.OOE+000 0.OOE+000 5.45E+001 -2.60E+001 0.00E+000 1 3.00E+000 3 2.90E+001 -4.OOE+000 O.OOE+000 2.90E+001 -2.60E+001 O.OOE+O00 1 3.00E+000 Concrete Points :

Number of Concrete Points: 0 Weld Lines &

1. of elements per line: 1 Number of Weld Lines : 0 Reduction Factors :

Reduction Factor Input for Anchor # 1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length : 3.25, Min:= 3.25 in.

Gap at Threaded Anchor : 0.00 in.

Edge Distance - Edge 1 : 7 50 in.

Crack Size : 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <- 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Base Strength and Load Path : Ok Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed : Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor # 2 Adequately Installed : Yes Embedment Length 3.25, Min:= 3.25 in.

Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.

9

, Rev. 0, Page F-17 of 55 Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-0003 N'PA - Indian Point Unit 3 BCIIARG31.DOC 4

Edge Distance- Edge 1 : 7.50 in.

Crack Size : 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Base Strength and Load Path: Ok Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed : Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor # 3 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: 3.25, Min:= 3.25 in.

Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.

Edge Distance - Edge 1 : 7.50 in.

Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <- 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Base Strength and Load Path : Ok Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed : Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor # 4 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: 3.25, Min:= 3.25 in.

Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.

Edge Distance - Edge 1 : 7.50 in.

Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Base Strength and Load Path: Ok Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed : Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc Pall Parlk- I -

No Id VaUl Vallt RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1 1 2638.13 N/A 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1,00 1.00 3904.50 N/A 1.00 100 100 1.00 100 1.00 0.95 1ý00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 1 2638.13 N/A 100 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1,00 3904.50 N/A 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 2638.13 N/A 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 11.00 0.75 1.00 0.75 1.00 1,00 1.00 3904.50 N/A 1.00 1000 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 1,00 o00 4 1 2638.13 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1 00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 100 1.00 100 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 3904.50 N/A 1(,0 Legend N/A = Not Applicable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vail = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection PalIr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

= Outlier X = Reduction Factor Not Used R'.. = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy

39

, Rev. 0, Page F-18 of 55 Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-000

,NYPA - Indi.in Point Unit 3 BCHARG3l.DOC 5

RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing RE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF = Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads Analysis Results &

Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's) Allowable No N-S E-W Vertical Load Factor 1 3.40E-001 1.36E-001 1.36E-001 4.379 2 -3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 7.205 3 -3.40E-001 1.36E-001 1.36E-001 4.381 4 3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 7.190 5 3.40E-001 -1'.36E-001 1.36E-001 4.899 6 -3.40E-001 1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 5.162 7 3.40E-001 1.36E-001 -1 36E-001 5.162 8 -3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 1.36E-001 4.901 9 1,36E-001 3.40E-001 1.36E-001 1.848 10 -1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 2.981 11 1.36E-001 -3140E-001 1.36E-001 2.313 12 -1.36E-001 3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 1.966 13 -1.36E-001 3.40E-001 1.36E-001 1.848 14 1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 2.981 15 1.36E-001 3.40E-001 -1.36E-001 1.966 16 -1 36E-001 -3.40E-001 1 36E-001 2.313 17 1.36E-001 1.36E-001 3.40E-001 3.990 18 -1 36E-001 -1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 18.073 19 1.36E-001 1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 5.904 20 -1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 3.40E-001 3.641 21 -1.36E-001 1.36E-001 3.40E-001 3.990 22 1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 18.153 23 1.36E-001 -1.36E-001 3.40E-001 3.641 24 -1.36E-001 1.36E-001 -3.40E-001 5.904 Minimum Allowable Load Factor: 1.85E+000

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-19 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-05 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-19 & 21 Equipment ID No. EDG-1 & EDG33 Equip. Class 16 Equipment Description Emeraemcy Diesel Generator Location: Bldg. DGB Floor El. 15'-0 Room, Area Cell 31 & 33 Condition The base plate for EDG air intake pipe support PS-Al-i & A1-2 has a maximum gap of 3/8" to the concrete surface. There is additional bending stress at the /" Hilti bolt.

Documents Reviewed Burns and Roe calculation 6.07.025 Licensing Basis SSC providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically.

Evaluation The combined normal stress interaction induced by the bending stress resulting from the gap and the tensile stress was evaluated for SSE loading condition and found to be less than 1.0 for the 3/4" Hilti bolt. The four bolt anchorage maintains the shear/tensile interaction ratio factor of safety of 10.5, which is more than 5.0.

The evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes [_ No Prepared by: Kai Lo z- -K( Date 10-23-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Dan Nuta A047 Date 10-24-2012 Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

• i.., ::**:*

-iJ-* - :°'- **',<. '-:..**-**:!***/  ; ..-. ,;' 'r* * -** ,.*: , ,*.**:** * :.o* *- ~ ..,g.g** * .*.,  ;,;.-

...- `.-....

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-20 of 55 The pipe support beam for air intake pipeing at EDG 31 & 33 has a gap of 3/8" maximum. This beam is for support PS-Al-1 & AI-2. The large gap can cause bending stress at the bolt and needs to be evaluated.

Reference Calculation 6.07.025, page 11 V = vertical shear = 0.81 kips/bolt T= tension = 0.43 kips/bolt d = gap behing base plate = 0.375 in per field walkdown M = bending moment caused by gap = Vd = 303.75 in-lb D = Hilti bolt stud diameter = 0.75 in S = section modulus = TOD3/32 = 0.041 in' fb = bending stress = M/S = 7334 psi Fb = allowable bending stress = 1.33(0.6)(35000) = 27930 psi check normal stress at bolt:

At = tensile stress area = 0.334 in 2 ft = tensile stress = T/At = 1287 psi Ft = allow tensile stress = 1.33(0.6)(35000) = 27930 psi steel bolt interaction = ft/Ft + fb/Fb = 0.309 < 1.0, o.k.

Check expansion anchor interaction:

Per page 11 of Calculation 6.07.025, page 11, safety factor = 10.5 > 5, o.k.

Based on a safety factor of 5, interaction = 5/10.5 = 0.476 > 1.0, o.k.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

"-.. ," -. 3iJ'. <- ' 7 .- "

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-21 of 55 ATTnACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-06 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -076 Equipment IDNo. DG-31 Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description Diesel Generator No. 31 Location: Bldg. DGB Floor El. 15'-0 Room, Area Cell 31 Condition

1. The lube oil pipe is in contact with the jacket water cooler pipe.

2. Angle iron for support of P1-1561 (31 D/G Crankcase Pressure Indicator) tubing is almost in contact with DF-23-1 P1-1375 (Root Isolation Valve) tubing.

Documents Reviewed No previous analysis or evaluation located.

Licensing Basis No adverse seismic interaction between SSC providing a safety-related function.

Evaluation

1. There is no adverse seismic interaction between the lube oil piping and jacket water cooler pipe.

2. There is no adverse seismic interaction between the DF-23-1 P1-1375 tubing and the angle iron.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes E- No Prepared by: Kai Lo, Date 10-23-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: D. Nuta Peer Reviewerr

~42XJr Date 10-24-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-22 of 55

1. The jacket water cooler pipe is in contact with the lube oil pipe. The lube oil pipe extends approximately 8" from the heat exchanger that is rigidly supported. The natural frequency of the lube oil pipe should be in the rigid range, above 33 Hz. The jacket water cooler pipe extends downward approximately 18" from the HX piping, slightly less rigid than the lube oil pipe because of the two couplings. The two heat exchangers and the EDG are on the same foundation. The seismic displacement for the two pipes during postulated occurrence of a seismic event should be of very small magnitude due to their rigid behavior. The jacket water pipe will rotate slightly at the coupler to give way to accommodate the displacement of the lube oil pipe. The seismic interaction will not be an adverse one.

2. The angle iron is rigidly supported with approximately 6" cantilever length and there are no sharp edges. During a seismic event, the tubing will vibrate and rub against the flat surface of the angle iron for 20 seconds or so. For such a small mass and short period of time, there will be no adverse seismic interaction between the tubing and the angle iron as the forces developed at the interface will be very small.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-23 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 2 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-07 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -096 Equipment ID No. EDG-31-FO-TNK Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description 31 EDG Fuel Oil Day Tank Location: Bldg. DGB Floor El. 26'-0 Room, Area Cell 31 Condition There are two saddles supporting the tank, each with 4 bolts. Two of 4 bolts on the north saddle, one at each end of the saddle are missing nuts.

Documents Reviewed The SEWS anchorage evaluation was not in image file in MERLIN, consequently considered as no evaluation.

Drawing IP3V-0353-001 Licensinq Basis SSC providing a safety-related function must be seismically supported to maintain its function during and after a seismic event.

Evaluation The anchor bolts are structurally adequate without the two nuts.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: [ Yes ] No Prepared by: Kai Lo Ix ---

• Date 10-24-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Dan Nuta -A--tý , Date 10-25-2012 Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-24 of 55 SWELl NO. 96 Check bolt at the saddle with 2 out of 4 nuts missing Building : DGB EL. 15', located on a platform - EL. 27',

Conservatively using peak of 0.5% damping response spectra at EL. 48' Gh = horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.98 Gv = vertical seismic acceleration = 2/3(Gh) = 0.653 max vertical acceleration = 1 - Gv = 0.347 (downward)

W = weight of Fuel Oil Day Tank = 2220 lb MRM = multi-modal response multiplier 1.5 e = vertical eccentricity 15 inch Mx = Mz = W(MRM)(Gh)e 48951 in-lb Fx = Fz = W(MRM)(Gh) 3263 lb Fy =W(1 - Gv) 770 Ib (downward) sl = spacing between bolts at each saddle = 22.5 inch s2 = spacing between saddle = 30 inch n = number of bolts for shear at each saddle = 4 "2

n'= number of bolts for tension at saddle that has nuts =

T' = tension at each saddle bolt location = Mx/(2sl) + Mz/(s2) - Fy/4 = 2527 lb T = tension per bolt = T'/n' = 1264 lb 2 05 V = shear per bolt =[Fx + Fz1] /n 1154 lb D = bolt diameter = 0.75 inch, in2 As = tensile area = 0.334 in2 Ar = root area = 0.309..

Ft = allow tensile stress = 20000

• psi Fv = allow shear stress = 10000: psi Ta = allow tension = Ft(As) = 6680 lb Va = allow shear = Fv(Ar) = 3090 lb interaction = T/Ta + V/Va = 0.75 < 1.33 for seismic load EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-25 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-08 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL 1-076 Equipment ID No. DG-31 Equip. Class 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 31 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 31 DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Condition Observed a tight crack passing through a bolt for a fire protection support at the southeast corner of the room. Photo attached in IP3 SWEL 1-076.

Documents Reviewed

1. DBD-310, "Design Basis Document for Seismic Piping and Supports"

2. EPRI NP-5228-SL, "Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment Anchorage" Volume 1 Licensinq Basis In seismic class I building such as Emergency Diesel Generator Building, the fire protection piping must be designed for II over I seismic interaction.

Evaluation Based on SQUG criteria per EPRI NP-5228-SL, Revision 1, Volume 1, Table 2.16, where the crack width is between 10 mills and 20 mills, a factor of safety of 4 is adequate for expansion anchor integrity. It is judged that the crack under observation falls into this width range and since plant procedure is to design to a safety factor of 4, the condition is determined to be acceptable. In addition, this is a four bolt base plate and supports a small diameter fire water line. It is judged that the gravity plus seismic loads applied to the bolts would result in a factor of safety significantly greater than 4.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes ElI No Prepared by: Kai Lo Date 10-26-2012 Lic nsing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: PeerRevierDate Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-26 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-09 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-1 4 Equipment ID No. N/A Equip. Class N/A Equipment Description N/A Location: Bldg. AFPB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area Condition A conduit have a span of 16 feet between the floor and the next support. Determine the stress and whether there is any seismic interaction concern.

Documents Reviewed No design document is found.

Licensing Basis In seismic class I building such as AFP Building, the rigid conduit raceway must be designed for seismic interaction.

Evaluation The stress at the 2" vertical conduit is below the allowable stress limit.

The seismic displacement is small and the seismic interaction effect is insignificant.

The evaluation is shown on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes L[ No Prepared by: Kai Lo /61( Date 10-31-2012 Licensing Basis Aeviewe

• /./ ]/,*'n ,' / /

Reviewed by: Richard Drake .JDate 10-31-2012 Peer Reviewer-1I

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-27 of 55 AWC NO 14 Vertical conduit (2" )may have a missing support, check max supported span Conservative to neglect the restraining effect of the existing Unistrut support.

L= 16 . ft, cons. estimated w= 4.91'- plf = 0.409 #/inich Location: AFPB EL. 43', use peak G value from 0.5% damping response respectra Gh = 1.09 [Ref. 1]

MRM = .2.0.

Gv = 2Gh/3 = 0.727 D = outside diameter = 2.375 in [Ref. 2]

d = inside diameter = 2.083 in 4 d4 ]/D =

- 0.537 in3 S section modulus = 0.0982[D 1 = moment of inertia = 0.0491[D"-d 4

]= 0.638 in4 E = modulus of elasticity = 29000000 psi M = wL2/12 = 1257.0 in-lb 2 05 Since conduit is vertical, Gr = MRM(2Gh )° = . 3.083.

fb = Gr(M)/S = 7215 psi, 1.33(0.6)(35000) = 27930 psi 4

d = displacement =Gr(wL )/(384EI) = 0.241 in Since the displacement is small, the seismic interaction effect on the adjacent items is insignificant.

Reference:

1. CES-2A, Rev. 2

2. B-Line Strut SystemCatalog SS99

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-28 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-10 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-054 Equipment ID No. CCRAC31 Equip. Class 11 Equipment Description Control Room AC Unit 31 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0 Room, Area CCRAC room Condition A Unistrut channel that has a cantilever length of 48" has a 3/8" tubing inside the channel.

The cantilever end of the channel has a duct tape. There is a need to investigate the stress, deflection of the Unistrut channel and determine if there is any adverse seismic interaction if there is contact.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this tubing was found.

Licensing Basis Tubing providing a safety-related function needs to be supported seismically. The tubing support must be designed seismically. Both the tubing and support stress must be designed to the B31.1 and AISC codes and standards.

Evaluation The tubing is supported by the Unistrut channel. Since the channel has a long cantilever, the stress, displacement for the channel, and the channel induced displacement load onto the tubing need to be evaluated.

A new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: N Yes [-] No Prepared by: KaiLo ý -- 1- Date 11-1-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer I,. ~

Reviewed by: c../--H AN,4"C"L Date kl - -2_oQ-Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-29 of 55 SWELl - 054 L = cantilever length of Unistrut channel = 48 in w = uniform weight of Unistrut channel = 1.9 plf = 0.1583 #/in Use w = 0.18 W/in , cons. to include weight of tube S = min. section modulus = 0.203 in3 I = min. moment of inertia = 0.186 in 4 E = modulus of elasticity = 2.90E+07 psi At Control building EL. 33, use 0.5% damping response spectrum Gh = peak horizontal acceleration = 0.69 Gv =(2/3)Gh = 0.460 The Unistrut P1000 has a vertical orientation Gr = resultant of acceleration = [2Gh 2 10.5= 0.98 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 1.50 M = bending moment = wL2/2 = 207.4 in-lb fb = bending stress = MRM(Gr)(M/S) = 1495 psi < 1.33(25000) = 33250 psi, o.k.

Check deflection at cantilever end d = deflection = MRM(Gr)[wL 4/(8EI)] = 0.032 inch D = diameter of tubing = 0.375 inch t = wall thickness of tubing = 0.065 inch d = inside diameter of tubing = D - 2t = 0.245 inch 4 4 3 S, section modulus of 3/8" tubing = 0.0982[D -d A/D =4 0.00424 in 4

in It = moment of inertia of tubing = Sc(O.5D) = 0.0007941 For a simple support beam with force at mid-span, length = 60 in 2

M = 12EItd/L fb = M/St = 12EId/(StL2 ) = 587 psi < < 1.8(15000psi) = 27000psi Since the seismic displacement is small, any tubing bending stress resulted from the 0.032" forced displacement loading on a flexible tubing system will not be significant.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-30 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-1 1 Originating SWC/AWC SWEL-095 Equipment ID No. COND STOR TK Equip. Class 21 Equipment Description Condensate Storage Tank (31 CST)

Location: Bldg. YLD Floor El. 69'-0 Room, Area Condition A lighting pole is next to the tank. Determine the seismic interaction between the light pole and the CST.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis Safety-related function of the CST must not be impaired by non-safety related equipment such as a light pole.

Evaluation The lighting pole will withstand a design basis seismic event and will not overturned or collapsed onto the CST.

A new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: ] Yes I-I No Prepared by: Kai Lo L& _. Date 11-5-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: .k~r*4,. Pt1"C"/- Date _11_____

Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-31 of 55 SWEL-095 Determine if the seismic bending moment is less than wind induced design bending moment t = assumed thickness of the pole = .0.12 . inch = 0.0100 ft determine weight of horizontal pole: [Ref. 1]

Li = length of horizontal pole = [1.72 + 92]°.s = 9.16 ft Assume the horizontal pole is 6" on one end and 3.5" on the other end, D1 = average diameter of horizontal pole = 0.5(6"+3.5")112 = 0.396 ft WI = weight of horizontal pole = (D1)n(L1)t(165pcf) = 18.79 lb determine weight of vertical pole: [Ref. 1]

L2 = length of vertical pole = . 26.34:. ft Assume the vertical pole is 9" on one end and 6" on the other end, D2 = average diameter of horizontal pole = 0.5(9"+6")/12 = 0.625 ft W2 = weight of vertical pole = (D2)rE(L2)t(165pcf) = 85.34 lb W3 = weight of lighting assembly = 50.... lb assumed L3 = c.g. of lighting assembly to vertical pole = .9 ft estimated [Ref. 1]

Using the peak G value from the 0.5% damping ground response spectra curve Gh = horizontal DBE seismic acceleration = 0.64 Gv = vertical DBE seismic acceleration = (2/3)Gh = 0.427 Determine bending moment at the ground elevation:

M1= bending moment induced by WI = Wl(Gv)(0.SL1) + Wl(1.4lGh)(L2 -0.5 + 2')

= 508.86 ft-lb M2 = bending moment induced by W2 = W2(1.41GH)(0.5L2 + 2')

= 1168.19 ft-lb M3= bending moment induced by W3 = W3(Gv)(L3) + W3(1.41Gh)(L2 -0.5 + 2')

= 1448.141 ft-lb M = total seismic induced bending moment = MI+M2+M3 = 3125.2 ft-lb Based on state of NY dept of transportation for lamp post foundation:

For 30' long lamp post, design moment capacity = 11065 <ft-lb [Ref. 2]

Since the design moment of foundation has a minimum safety factor of 1.5 versus the applied moment, i.e. 7300 ft-lb, and the seismic induced bending moment is less, the pole will not bend over, or overturn and collapsed on the CST tank during a seismic event.

Reference

1. Drawing 9321-F-30253

2. State of NY Department of Transportation, "Lamppost Foundation", 670-01, 670-02, 670-03 EN-DC-168 REV 0

U-,

c')

To 0ý -+

v. RmTslskw wt11-. -,-MAmor cow!

E T&LESLt STLE) ELOUA'S 9M51

-P.-I£'L 4 maSA 0~

CRO GM 110 SMAL SIMS MaE 6

z unclussmMKIXDlAIE. QAE 0- iL K KWL AM . \. I.

0.

CL (D 11 xM? 30!

C3

.r OFAL 5 C= IMo MLKLNT n mPA - /u am L .1 OEM Im OD 4M OF £414617 in ~ ntm'1'IRIPL ALFL A.

Ulan WT~ CAP5A V X 45-E CA 151 A m ST U~CU V WLLABE ON DCT--, cwTh myA~

1. w WISIIF MIN q ELEVATION FOU AT'N WITH PRECASTCA FlU 14) 0

$1LnamD WIEEDMM= 5WMAL M IMMIA L.WSS W

15*4PLY WENTTOlSSST Im0 1

L. ALLL~k M ShALL Kf CIDA (sUM TRIMUG SALWETMl OnS.

0E40 51W! OWK 150. TU OFIERSSEA inWm. SEEISML 511T TrTLE'RUM5 OECM JA L GRUN i OCS1ALLATIO PETAILS rem L. TV" 14 £155 M LITI L'5. - NWCOVE lEWOM r SEESILL Gram TMII wE WhsIM L. 85516 OFTHELEG AT E 9011110OF[AC MOMOL. SMECSITgSM11 L. FV F F6MTIN 5 FOBl 10K SAEPi~ll= CAP OW 3511+/-K 5016K ASEI SLATnAmB SmolluO LID SM ENAST In LBS TOMUMj TE ElA5111 Ill MAIN SSUESDo Tic Now ID LM so. PerS EVASUI. LAWnMK 1I.1. P0K M Am DU LS OFSNE am! aToK SulcIE wows 4c IlL ,MU Wm ~A] WrSSEFLWMBi1 OFI T2545 OF TOLSTANMID VEWLASU ASPART FLaMIYDA lESimAS K SA] K LCMW 53OF 'T Dom1 Fal THE010 ST ATEOFNEIOR LAN THE SL FO KA5ON I

HEOUST 34. MTrT1lC1 UMi IN 0WT TO 151411110MO IT55th.O DEPARTIENT Or TRANSPORTATION 0.=L ftma lome3111+/- ML S ISAIEUM "Ca1*0W!UM LAWFM U&SUBTSATG S11156KBStEl I . r COMTE FOWATM DEPTH 'V iii -ME ELEVATION CASTINPLACE FOSIATIU LAMPP'OST WIMPRCASTCAP

£31:

13 POL To w AA FULAS II onM 350W EM3 9D9wE LAMPPOST FILE5A.

FOUNDATIONS 70SALS01u'U 6EN

+ -. A-T0 -Amm-M-LT" HOR.U.M.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-33 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-12 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-028 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 55-0 Room, Area Condition A camera support base plate does not have any anchor bolt. Need to see if the support can overturn during a seismic event.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis Non-safety related equipment such as a camera support in a Seismic Class I building must not induce adverse seismic interaction with Safety-related equipment. The support must be seismically designed for II over I interaction.

Evaluation The camera support can not overturn during a design basis seismic event. A higher safety factor is desirable.

The new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes F] No Prepared by: Kai Lo Z Date 11-7-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Date l-U7.-[.),

Peerplviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-34 of 55 AWC- 28 Camera on a pole with a base olate that has no anchor bolts L= cantilever length of camera support pole = 75 inch, measured W1 = weight of camera = 7 lb estimated B = dimension of square baseplate = 18 inch W2 = weight of 1.5" square pole & angle bracket = 12 lb estimated for 0.09" thk.

W3 = weight of baseplate = 45 lb (1/2" thick plate)

For PAB EL. 55', peak G from 2% damping response spectra is used because of bolted structure Gh= 0.42 Gv = (2/3)Gh = 0.28

[1 - Gv] = 0.72 downward M = applied overturning moment = Gh[W1(L) + 0.5W2L] = 410 in-lb Mr = resisting moment =[1-Gv](W1+W2+W3)(0.5B) = 415 in-lb Since resisting moment is greater than overturning moment, the camera pole assembly can not overturn. It is desirable to have a higher safety factor against overturning.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-35 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-13 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-27 Equipment ID No. SWELl-029 Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description 32 RHR Pump Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 15'-0 Room, Area Condition A 4" liquid waste disposal pipe adjacent to the east wall has a 25' to 30' span.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis Piping adjacent to safety related equipment needs to be seismically designed for II over I interaction.

Evaluation The pipe stress is well below the B31.1 code limit. The piping will not have any adverse II over I interaction during a design basis seismic event.

The new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes El No Prepared by: Kai Lo Ž' " Date 11-6-2012 Licensing Basis Revie-wer Reviewed by: cN t'AJ ?&r"-.-- Date 11-62oI2_

Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-36 of 55 AWC- 27 Liquid Waste pipe has 25' to 30' span length D = pipe outside diameter = 4.5 inch t = wall thickness for sch 40 pipe = 0.237 inch S = section modulus of 4" Sch 40 pipe = 3.21 in' w = uniform weight of pipe and water = 16.3 plf P = design pressure = 150 psi i =SIF of 4" LR elbow = 1.95 For PAB EL. 43, 0.5% damping response spectra Gh = peak horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.63 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 2.0 Gv = (2/3)Gh = 0.42 Base on fixed-fixed end condition:

L1= 8 ft L2 = 22 ft M1 X4-Mmax c

For dead weight normal loading Treat the beam AB as fixed-fixed with one length of L2 in the Y direction L = L2 = 22 ft At point A, Mmax = wL /12 = 7889.2 in-lb At point B, M1 = wL 2/112 = 7889.2 in-lb Ma = max(Mmax, M1) = 7889.2 in-lb PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma/S) = 3169.7 psi, 0.75i = 1.0 Sh = allow pipe stress for A312 Tp304 material = 15950 psi, o.k.

PD/(4t) + 0.75i(M1/S) = 4306 psi < Sh, o.k.

For vertical seismic MRM(Gv) = 0.84 At point A, MbVa = MRM(Gv)Mmax = 6626.9 in-lb At point B, MbVb = MRM(Gv)MI= 6626.9 in-lb For horizontal seismic loading in Z direction Treat the beam AC as fixed-fixed with one length of (L1+L2) in the Z direction MRM(Gh) = 2Gh = 1.26 L = L1+L2 = 30 ft 2

Mmax = wL /12 = 14670 in-lb At point A, MbhA =MRM(Gh)Mmax = 18484.2 in-lb 2

At point B, x = L2, MbhB = MRM(Gh)(6Lx - L -6x2)(w/12) = 3203.9 in-lb Bending moment at point A is higher Mb = SRSS(MbA, MbhA) = 19636.2 in-lb EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-37 of 55 Combining DW i- seismic DBE Ma + Mb= 27525.4 in-lb PD/(4t) + 0.75i(M,,Mj/S = 9287 psi, 0.75i = 1.0 1.8Sh = 28710 psi, o.k.

Pipe is structurally adequate per B31.1 code requirement.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-38 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-14 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-32 Equipment ID No. SWELl-026 Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 55'-0 Room, Area Condition A 1.5" (1.9" O.D.), threaded hot water pipe from area heater UH335 has a long 15 feet span adjacent to the wall.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis Safety-related function of nearby equipment must not be impaired by non-safety related equipment such as the hot water heater piping.

Evaluation The pipe stress is well below the B31.1 code limit. The piping will not have any adverse I1 over I interaction during a design basis seismic event.

The new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes - No Prepared by: KaiLo ,*.

• Date 11-6-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: CN', . e--tc.l, 0AJ .*, &0" Date 11_ 2_ _(

Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-39 of 55 AWC- 32 Hot water heater pipe (1.9" OD) with 15 feet pipe span along the wall D = pipe outside diameter = 1.9 inch t = wall thickness for sch 40 pipe = 0.145 inch S = section modulus of 4" Sch 40 pipe = 0.326 in3 w = uniform weight of pipe and water = 3.60 plf P = design pressure = 150 psi, cons.

i =SIF of threaded pipe = 2.3 L = span length of pipe = 15 ft For PAB EL. 72', 0.5% damping response spectra Gh = peak horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.75 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 2.0 Gv = (2/3)Gh = 0.5 Base on fixed-fixed end condition:

Y x  % L mA For dead weight normal loading Treat the beam AB as fixed-fixed with length of Lin the Y & Z direction L= 15 ft At point A, Mmax = wL2/12 = 810 in-lb Ma Mmax = 810 in-lb PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma/S) = 4777 psi , 0.75i = 1.725 Sh = allow pipe stress for A53 Gr B, CS material 15000 psi, o.k.

For seismic loading Gr = SRSS of vertical and horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.9014 MRM(Gr) = 1.803 At point A, Mb = MRM(Gv)Mmax = 1460.2 in-lb Combining DW + seismic DBE Ma + Mb= 2270.2 in-lb PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma+Mb)/S = 12504 psi 1.8Sh = 27000 psi, o.k.

Pipe is structurally adequate per B31.1 code requirement.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-40 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 4 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-15 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-33 Equipment ID No. SWEL2-001 Equip. Class 6 Equipment Description Refueling Water Purification Pump Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area Condition A 1.5" (1.9" O.D.), vertical PCV vent pipe (adjacent to the purification pump) has a long 12 feet span going into the HVAC duct.

Documents Reviewed No previous seismic calculation for this condition was found.

Licensing Basis Safety-related function of nearby equipment must not be impaired by non-safety related equipment such as the PVC vent pipe.

Evaluation The pipe stress is below the allowable stress limit. The piping will not have any adverse II over I interaction during a design basis seismic event. The existing tie-wrap should be changed to a pipe clamp.

The new evaluation is performed on the next page.

Conclusion (8) Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: E Yes [I No Prepared by: Kai Lo t#-* Date 11-7-2012 Licensing Basis/

Reviewer Reviewed by: ck__ .rvA ftJ PA-rCt.,- c/v-, Po,?- Date It .- -- 2-o Peer Reviewer EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-41 of 55 AWC- 33 PVC vent pipe (1.9" OD) with approximately 12 feet pipe span The pipe is supported at one end from the wall and the other is at the duct D = pipe outside diameter = 1.9 inch t = wall thickness for sch 40 pipe = 0.145 inch S = section modulus of 4" Sch 40 pipe = 0.326 in3 w = uniform weight of pipe = 0.537 plf P = design pressure = 50 psi, cons.

i =SIF of threaded pipe = 2.3 , used conservatively L = span length of pipe = 12 ft For PAB EL. 72', 0.5% damping response spectra Gh = peak horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.66 MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 2.0 Gv = (2/3)Gh = 0.44 Base on fixed-fixed end condition:

X y4-  % L__ T A The pipe came out from the wall with a short span, considered the pipe has a fixed condition. The pipe then goes up vertically to the duct, consider this end as pin.

Stress induced by y directional loading, i.e. dead weight and vertical seismic will be low, and is negligible.

Treat the beam AB as pin-fixed with length of L in the X & Z direction For seismic loading Gr = SRSS of two horizontal seismic acceleration = 1.41Gh = 0.9306 MRM(Gr) = 1.861 Mmax = wL 2/8 = 115.99 in-lb Mb = MRM(Gr)Mmax = 215.9 in-lb Combining DW + seismic DBE Ma = bending moment from DW = 0 in-lb Ma + Mb = 215.9 in-lb PD/(4t) + 0.75i(Ma+Mb)/S = 1306 psi Consider the allowable stress for PVC pipe as 1600 psi, based on safety factor= 2.5 For a temporary seismic loading, increase the allowable stress by 1.33 would result in SF=1.88 Allowable stress for seismic loading = 1.33(1600) = 2128 psi, o.k.

Pipe is structurally adequate.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-42 of 55 34 PVC PIPE-DESIGN AND INSTALLATION Allowable Longitudinal Bending When installing PVC pipe, some changes in alignment of the pipe may be accom-plished without the use of elbows, sweeps, or other direction-change fittings. Con-trolled longitudinal bending of the pipe within acceptable limits can be accommodated by PVC pipe itself. Longitudinal deviation of the pipeline can be accommodated through either joint offset or axial flexure (curving) of the pipe. Curving of PVC pipe may increase the possibility of failures during tapping under pressure. Whenever prac-ticable, taps should be made on the inside radiusof longitudinallybent pipe.

Permissible joint offset may be significant when gasketed joints that are designed for such a purpose are provided on the PVC pipe. Depending on pipe size and joint design, the offset per joint for gasketed PVC pipe joints in the unstressed condi-tion varies from approximately Ili° to 5'. Available joint offset is dependent upon inser-tion depth of the spigot. Assembly should be made only to the mark provided.

"Homed" or over-inserted assemblies allow for no flexibility. Some manufacturers encourage joint offset only for accommodation of laying water pipe not to grade, with fittings to be used for known changes in direction. Joint offset limits should be obtained from the manufacturer for joints that are to be stressed to the permissible limit without leakage.

Mathematical relationships for the longitudinal bending of pressurized tubes have been derived by Reissner. These relationships compare favorably to those of Timoshenko and others. One critical limit to bending of PVC pipe is long-term flexural stress. Axial bending also causes a very small amount of ovalization or diametric deflection of the pipe.

AWWA PVC pipe has short-term strengths of 7,000-8,000 psi (48.26-55.16 MPa) in tension and 11,000-45,000 psi (75.84-403.42 MPa) in flexure. The long-term strength of PVC pipe in either tension, compression, or flexure can conservatively be assumed to equal the hydrostatic design basis HDB of 4,000 psi (27.58 MPa). Applying a 2.5:1 safety factor results in an allowable long-term tensile or flexural stress equal to the recommended hydrostatic stress S of 1,600 psi (11.03 MPa) for AWWA C900 PVC pipe at 73.4 F (230 C). The 2:1 safety factor used for AWWA C905 PVC pipe sim-ilarly yields a hydrostatic stress of 2,000 psi (13.79 MPa). However, the bending of PVC pipe barrels larger than 12 in. (300 mm) is usually not recommended because of the forces required. Either the 1,600 psi (11.03 MPa) or 2,000 psi (13.79 MPa) figure may be used for the allowable long-term flexural stress in gasketed joint pipe that is free of longitudinal stress from internal pressure longitudinal thrust. However, when the joints are restrained as in solvent cementing, without snaking the pipe in the trench, then the end thrust from internal pressure imposes a longitudinal tensile stress equal to one-half of the hoop stress.

The equation for allowable bending stress Sb is Sb = (HDB-SSt)- (4-13)

Where:

HDB = hydrostatic design basis of PVC pipe, psi [4,000 psi (27.58 MPa) for AWWA C900 and C905]

St = HDB/2 = tensile stress from longitudinal thrust, psi T' = temperature rating factor (see Table 5-1)

SF = safety factor (2.5 or 2.0 as applicable)

NOTE: The longitudinal stress from thermal expansion and contraction can be ignored in buried gasketed joint piping because of relaxation of the soil restraint over the length between joints. When determining bending limits, longitudinal thermal stresses should beconsidered in restrained pipes, such as lines with solvent-cemented joints and restrained and supported piping.

Copyright © 2002 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-43 of 55 ESoftewning Starts (approx.) 1250*F Material Becomes Viscous 1350°F Material Carbonizes 1425TF Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) 143 ASTM D2863 Clean Room Materials Flammability Test N/A FM 4910 SCHEDULE 40 & 80 - DIMENSIONS Schedule 40 Dimensions Z Ifc I Z.i.Ut-#l i V. 104zl 1 O.I/Ul Z-ou 2-1/2" 2.87551 2.445 0.203 1.136 300 3" 3.500 3.042 0.216

• 1.488 i 260 3-1/2" 4.000 3.521 0.226 1.789 240 4" 4500 4 3.998 1 0.237 " i2.118  ! 220 1 5" 5.5631 5.016 0.258 2.874 190 6" 62 5 6.031 0.280 3733 180 8" '8625 7.942 0.322 5.619 160 10" 10.750 J 9.976 0.365 7.966 140 12" _ 12.7501 11.889 0.406 10.534 130

. 14" 14.000 13.073__ 0.437 1 12.462 1 130 16 14.940 0.500 16.28630 18" 18.000 6.809 0.562 1' 20.58j 130 20" 20.000 18.743 0.593 24.183 t 120 24" f 24.000 22.544 0.687 33.652 1 120 Schedule 80 Dimensions 111111111111111 WNW

. .. 0~ * -..-

Min. Wall I Nom.

1/8 405 .195 0.095 0.063 1230 1

.540 5/4" 282 0119 0105 1130 3/8" .6751 .403 126 0.146 1 920

/4 1840 7.526 02147 0.213 850 3/4" 1.050 .722 0.1!54 0.289 690

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-44 of 55 AI-rACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. L- -lb Originating SWC/AWC AWC-02 Equipment ID No. _ Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area SWITCHGEAR ROOM Condition Observed a crack passing through a bolt for a conduit support supporting conduits coming out of Relay Box TR-2 KOO on the north wall. Photos attached in A WC-02.

Documents Reviewed EPRI NP-5228-SL, Revision 1, Volume 1,"Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment Anchorage" Volume 1: Development of Anchorage Guidelines Licensing Basis Expansion anchordesign has a safety factor of 4.

Evaluation Based on SQUG criteria per EPRI NP-5228-SL, Revision 1, Volume 1, Table 2.16, where the crack width is between 10 mills and 20 mills, a factor of safety of 4 is adequate for fastener integrity. It is judged that the crack under observation falls into this width range and since plant procedureis to design to a safety factor of 4, the condition is determined to be acceptable. The crack width of this size has been accounted for by a safety factor of 4.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: N Yes H] No

/---?

Prepared by: Kai Lo Date 11-7-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Date il/7/Žk I .

Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-45 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet I of 5 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-17 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-12 Equipment ID No. _ Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area ABFP Room Condition PWR-599 has only 4 anchor bolts instead of 6 as designed.

Documents Reviewed Calculation /P3-DBD-322-7.2.5 Licensing Basis Forexpansion anchorbolt, tension shear interactionmust be less than 1.0.

Evaluation With 4 bolts, the stress interaction is still less than 1.0.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Yes El No Prepared by: Kai Lo 16 6, Date 11-8-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewedby: LHr,-.AtJ PA-rc-1. Date 11 -__ ___ ---

Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-46 of 55 AWC- 12 PWR-599 has only 4 anchor bolts instead of 6 Per calculation IP3-DBD-322-7.2.5, p. 38 thru 40, The horizontal pipe whip force will have the following loads:

V = shear = 3.9 kip M = moment from cantilever length of 35" = 136.5 in-kip 1.5 Attachment is W6x12 t = plate thickness = 1.0 inch b = width of plate = *i12.0 inch T1 = tension per bolt = 136.5(7.5)/[2(7.5' + 1.52)] =

T2 = tension per bolt = 136.5(1.5)/[2(7.5 + 1.52)] = 8.75 kip 1.75 kip V = shear per bolt = V/4 = 0.98 kip For 1" HK bolt with 6" emb in 4000psi concrete:

For pipe whip restraint, a safety factor of 2.0 can be used Tu = ultimate tensile load = 20.52 kip Vu = ultimate shear load = 27.12 kip Ta = 0.5Tu = 10.26 kip Va = 0.5Vu = 13.56 kip T/Ta + V/Va = 0.925 < 1.0, o.k.

Check bending stress at plate C = total compression = 2(T1 + T2) = 21.0 kip fb = bending stress = 6[21(1.5)1/[12(1)2] = 15.75 ksi < 1.33(0.75Fy) = 35.91 Stress interaction at Hilti bolt and plate stress are below the acceptable limit.

GENERAL COMPUT AIrMe6WJeiport No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Pabe F-47 of 55 FORM 6015 dergn-a a ontmto h IKAME OF COMPAN4Y- C-01%L C- ý) - 66'1> j6 -r 3 J. 0. NO.-?32/-I':"

~ ~f5--------------DM.BATE

-UJC SUBJEC 567 (,r2 64B'f 1 ,;!7 76 q' HoL,-t.5 (-ryp.)

FcKg -. zU 6o47. {'(fa

('2 "fOrpE St?-- S7P-P)

(/j~.

• '-'7 ~r '- ____

• 42*; *-**, 'I

- - - - - ~

'U I 3'~'3x~,L. 7!-

z X'/O~'t6.

'2~A1~~ I

-- O 1'

S::__,A,,IJ A-A I J  !

L, 0-

-A A- - (t-YP.)

LOAD A)_ _

GENERAL COMPUTAEMNIteSHELort No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-48 of 55 FORM 1016 J.o. NO.----------------

NAME OF COMP - --- -- -SHEEr NW.I ~ O.

DATE ----------.-.-----....----

- - ---- --- -- ---- ---- -------- -------- - --- ---- ---- ---------------- - ------ COMP. BY

.---- -- CKDBY K

L~gC 3',7 c~ Fi2 l

- c -4ee~ 3gý 0/j C) T

-&L~E VA Tf~"V 3" 3 )el5.6_

AT.z =3-'? xi 33x

~z-L~ ~

c'uy~R FA OvLr -

z-*-' '

,5" S I C,

,L,f I 7 R6___

21 x *c707 7

of 55 rl GENERAL COMPUTATJhqNe&Mgftport No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-49 FORM 5015 miL enm nmed~ ~ * & ~ ~ J 0.inar NO.ctsi J. O0. Pic ----.

_s}IEUNO. 40---.----------.....

._ _L_

NAME OF COMPANY DATEET ".-- --

COMP. BY .....--- - -C' K'D BY.__

SUBJECT ........-...-- --....----.-..-.---.....------.-.-.--.--.-......

-Fe'~'2 2~U4A1 D ~IAJ_4( K 36pA~r c2.~H-~c!AC &-!§ýZ- C-qg-yf)

Fi?,rir U'&L TA..*S L4* TC;P'r=* = l-.75 1

j.~:.s i-~"3~

7~T 7.Z5

• ./b-t_,z,*.. x -t2.c*

L L * "" 1 .)

sqK-

I A7_I.)_ c -- hlA = 3. x ,35= .5*,

4"

-v 26:;) -x.

- z e- err ,te S2'4-xta_'

_ 5CIO4

'21/e b 5'x ,707

--, x 2Z A ,,/ " _ (:7j)

- 36.5 _e

_ _ ~ 4 9LZ3e

~7K C

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-50 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUC TIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-18 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-12 Equipment ID No. _ Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area ABFP Room Condition 1" FP sprinklerpipe is 1"(+/-) away from a conduit.

Documents Reviewed Licensing Basis Adverse seismic interactionbetween two SSCs.

Evaluation The combinedseismic displacement of the FP pipe and conduit is. less than 1" (+/-) provided.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: I Yes n No Prepared by: Kai Lo /iý Date 11-8-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Chiman Patel Date 11-9-2012 Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-51 of 55 1" (1.315" OD) FP sprinkler pipe has a 1 "+/-from a 1" conduit Conservatively treat a 2 feet long, 1" pipe with a lump mass (15 feet of 1" pipe)

D = pipe outside diameter = 1.315 inch t = wall thickness for sch 40 pipe = 0,133 inch I = moment of inertia of 1" Sch 40 pipe = 0.0874 in' w = uniform weight of pipe and water = 2.173 plf= 0.1811 #/in m = lump mass of 15' of pipe = 32.6 lb use 35 L = cantilever length = 24 in Based on shield wall EL. 41', 0.5% damping response spectra Gh = horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.64 MRM = multi-modal respone multiplier = 2.0 E = modulus of elasticity =- 29000000 dl = seismic deisplacement due to lump mass = MRM(Gh)mL3 /(3EI) = 0.081 inch 4

d2 = seismic deisplacement due to self weight = MRM(Gh)wL /(8EI) = 0.0038 inch dpipe = total seismic displacement of the FP pipe = dl + d2 = 0.09 inch Determine the displacement of the 1" conduit D = conduit outside diameter = 1.315 inch d = conduit inside diameter = 1.063 inch I = moment of inertia of 1" conduit = 0.0491[D -d ] =

4 4 0.0841 in4 w = uniform weight of conduit and cable = 2.09 plf = 0.1742 #/in m = lump mass of 20' of conduit = 41.8 lb use 4.5 Case 1: a conduit with a cantilever of 12" and 20' of conduit mass L = cantilever length = 12 in dl = seismic deisplacement due to lump mass = MRM(Gh)mL /(3EI) = 3 0.0136 inch d2 = seismic deisplacement due to self weight = MRM(Gh)wL /(8EI) = 4 0.0002 inch d, = total seismic displacement of the conduit = dl + d2 = 0.0138 inch Case 2: conduit with a 8 feet span fixed-fixed condition L= 96 in dl = seismic displacement of conduit = wL4/(384EI) = 0.016 in The combined displacement of FP pipe and conduit = dpipe + dc = 0.101 in The combined seismic displacementof 0.101" is very small, less than 1" provided.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-52 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-19 Originating SWC/AWC AWC-25 Equipment ID No. _ Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 73'-0 Room, Area Condition Electric heat tracingcabinet support adjacentto the Boric Acid Batch Tank has corroded anchorage.

Documents Reviewed Cannot locate the calculation for the existing support.

Licensing Basis The safety related SSC must be designed seismically to maintain its function and for seismic interaction.

For expansion anchor bolt, tension shear interactionmust be less than 1.0.

Evaluation The corroded anchorageis structurallyadequate.

The new evaluation is on the next page.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: Z Yes - No Prepared by: Kai Lo X x Date 11-9-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: .f,.'I,, %1 Date -9 -Z.-.

Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-53 of 55 AWC- 25 Corroded anchorage at the base of Electric Heat Tracing Cabinet Li = cantilever length from center of cabinet to floor = 51 inch, measured L2 = length from center of cabinet to Unistrut post = 12"/2 = 6 inch, measured W1 = weight of cabinet 18"hx24"wx12"d = 50 lb estimated W2 = weight of content inside cabinet = so lb assumed d = distance between the weld at stair and the floor = 20 inch w = total weight = Wl+w2 = 100 lb x~j -1 For PAB EL. 73', peak G from 2% damping response spectra is used because of bolted structure MRM = 1.5 Gh= 0.54 Gv = (2/3)Gh= 0.36 Assuming each post will take half the applied loads Mz = applied overturning moment = 0.5{MRM(W)(Gh}W(L1) + W[1 + MRM(Gv)](L2)} = 2528 in-lb Mx = applied overturning moment = 0.5{MRM(W)(Gh)W(L1) + W[1 + MRM(Gv)](L2)j = 2528 in-lb My will be resolved as a force couple acting at the cantilever end I = distance between the two post = 20 inch Fx = couple formed by My = [MRM(Gh)(W)L2]/l = 24.3 lb Mz'= Fx(L.1) = 1239.3 in-lb The moments will be transformed into a force couple because of the weld at the staircase.

There are two bolts at each base of the post Vx = shear at the bolt = (Mz + Mz')/(2d) = 94 lb Vz = shear at the bolt = (Mx)/(2d) = 63 lb Vr = SRSS(Vx, Vz) = 113 lb T = max tension per bolt = 0.5W[1 - MRM(Gv)]/2 = 11.5 lb The bolts are 1/2" Hilti bolts Assume the corroded bolt as 1/4" Hilti Kwik Bolt Ta = allowable tension = 307.5 lb Va = allowable shear = 400 lb interaction = T/Ta + V/Va = 0.321 <1.0, o.k.

The corroded bolts is still structurally adequate.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-54 of 55 ATTACHMENT 9.9 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS Sheet 1 of 3 Licensing Basis (LB) Evaluation Form LB Evaluation No. LB-20 Originating SWC/AWC SWELl -045 Equipment ID No. _ Equip. Class Equipment Description Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 41'-0 Room, Area .

Condition Some of the anchor bolts on thePAB Supply Fan are corroded,more than surface corrosion.

Documents Reviewed Calculation IP3-CALC-PABHV-02203 Licensing Basis The safety related SSC must be designed seismically to maintain its function.

For expansion anchor bolt, the safety factor for design condition is 4.

Evaluation The corrodedexpansion anchorsare structurallyadequate, stress interactionis less than 1 based on SF=4.0 The new evaluation is on the next page.

Conclusion Condition Meets the Licensing Basis: [ Yes M-I No Prepared by: Kai Lo 't D)ate 11-9-2012 Licensing Basis Reviewer Reviewed by: Dan Nuta 15 C Dlate 11-9-2012 Peer Reviewer

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page F-55 of 55 SWELl- 45 The Hilit-Kwik bolts at the wall side have corrosion Ref. 1, Calculation IP3-CALC-PABHV-02202, 1% damping and multi-modal response multiplier of 1.5 was used. Since a fan has many bolted parts, and the fan's frame is bolted to the isolator, thus most of the energy is dissipated in the bolts, the 2.5% damping can be used per UFSAR for bolted structure.

For PAB EL. 41', for 2% damping, using peak peak of response spectra Gh2% = horizontal seismic acceleration = 0.4 2 2 For 2.5% damping, Gh 2 .5% = Gh 2%[ %/ .5%]°s = 0.358 Ref. EPRI TR-102180,"Guidelines for Estimation of Equipment Natural Frequency", Sect. 2.2 Natural frequency is usually higher than 8 Hz in the horizontal direction, horizontal MRM = multi-modal response multiplier = 1 .0 horizontal MRM(Gh 2 .S%) = 0.358 Ref. 1 page 2, Ah = 0.8, so load ratio = MRM(Gh 2 .s%)/Ah = 0.4472 horizontal direction In the vertical direction, use MRM = 1.5 due to < 8Hz frequency 3

Gv2.S% = (2/ )Gh2.s% = 0.2385 vertical MRM(GV2.s%) = 0.358 Ref. 1, page 2, Av = 0.53, so load ratio = MRM(Gv2.s%)/Av = 0.6750 vertical direction Ref. 1 page 8, bolt F has the highest tension of 633# due to seismic and dead weight of 281#.:

For 1% damping, Due to horizontal seismic event in X direction, Tx = 502* lb Due to horizontal seismic event in Z direction, Tz = 355 lb Due to vertical seismic event in Y direction, Ty = 149 lb Due to 2.5% damping, Tx = 502(0.4472) = 225 lb Tz = 355(0.4472) = 1595 lb Ty = 149(0.675) = 101L lb Tr = SRSS(Tx,Ty,Tz) = 293 lb For DW+ 2.5% damping seismic loading:

Tdw = 281 lb Tr - Tdw = 12 lb Ref. 1 page 9, shear on bolt = 300 lb Adjust the shear for 2.5% damping, shear at base plate = S = 0.4472(300#) = 134 lb Ref. 1 page 10, at each bolt, tension and shear are:

T/bolt = 1.2{(12/3)2 + [134x5.5/(2x3)12 + (134x5.5/8.375)2}°0 5 181 lb S/bolt = [2(134/3)2]0S = 63.2 lb Conservatively considered the existing 3/8" bolts have corroded to 1/4" Capacity of 1/4" HK bolt :

Ta = 1230/4 = 307.5 lb Sa = 400 lb interaction = T/Ta + S/Sa = 0.75 < 1.0, o.k.

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page G-1 of 4 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection? YE ND All five safety functions were adequately representedin SWEL-1

2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:

a. Various types of systems? YZ N-Various types of systems such as mechanical, electrical, control units etc. were considered

b. Major new and replacement equipment? YED NEI New/replacement equipment were represented (thermostats,solenoid valves, breakers etc. see Base List 1)

c. Various types of equipment? YE NO Various types of equipment were representedon the SWEL- 1, such as pumps, valves, fans, circuitbreakers, electrical cabinets, MCC's, switchgears,etc.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page G-2 of 4 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL

d. Various environments? YO Ni Various environments were considered.

e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program? YO NEi Yes, in particular,the EDG room C02 system was identified as a seismic vulnerability under the IPEEEprogram.A modification was subsequently installed.

The new installationof C02 fire suppression system 1A, 1B, IC for Diesel GeneratorRooms 31, 32, and 33 are described under Section 3.29.2, pp. 3-48 thru 3-51 of IP3-DBD-321, Rev.4.

f. Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1? YED NEI Yes, risk insights were considered in the development of SWEL- 1

3. For SWEL 2:

a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in YIE NEIl SWEL 2?

b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not YE NOI included in SWEL 2?

Yes, as shown in Table 4, Attachment B EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page G-3 of 4 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL

4. Provide any other comments (Attachment 9.11) related to the peer review of the SWELs.

The development of SWEL- 1 and SWEL-2 was conducted in satisfactionof the EPRI guidance.

5. Have all peer review comments been adequately addressed in the final SWEL? YZ NE]

Peer Reviewer #11:Tom Panavotidi Date: 11/07/2012 Peer Reviewer #2: Kenneth Whitmore 4 Jv o r e- Date: 11/07/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page G-4 of 4 ATTACHMENT 9.10 PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR SWEL FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions The following instructions are meant to aid in completing the form and a guideline pertaining to the type and amount of information that is to be placed in each section of the checklist.

For all items in the checklist, identify whether the action has been completed and provide comments and/or discussions with the Seismic Walkdown Team that can be considered applicable to answer the item in the checklist.

NOTE Add additional SWEL Peer Reviewers to the Peer Review Checklist form as required Peer Reviewer #1: -The SWEL Peer Reviewer shall print and sign their name and include the date that the review was complete.

Peer Reviewer #2: -The SWEL Peer Reviewer shall print and sign their name and include the date that the review was complete.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 Page H-I of 3 ATTACHMENT H - REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESOLUTIONS FORM

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page H-2 of 3 ATTACHMENT 9.11 PEER REVIEW COMMENT FORM Sheet I of I Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report

,,Entetg Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev.

Title:

Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Report Number 0 Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3:

Seismic Quality Related: Y]

Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions: N/A Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1 SWELl-013 0.2, Q.3: provide a statement on the condition of the Condition cannot be ascertained since it anchorage. is inside of the cabinet and the cabinet Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 cannot be opened except during an .

outage.

SWEs are noted on page 3.

2 SWELl-016 Q.2, Q.3: provide a statement on the condition of the Condition cannot be ascertained since it anchorage. is inside of the cabinet and the cabinet .

cannot be opened except during an outage.

3 SWELl-022 0.2, Q.3, Q.4: provide a statement on the condition of Statement on the condition of the the anchorage. anchorage has been added. _ "

4 SWELl -030 0.2, 0.3, Q.4: provide a statement on the condition of Statement on the condition of the '7, the anchorage. anchorage has been added.

5 SWELl -019 0.2, Q.3, Q.4: provide a statement on the condition of Statement on the condition of the r,'* .)

the anchorage. anchorage has been added.

6 SWELl-031, SWELl- Q.2 0.3 and Q4: provide a statement on the condition of Statement on the condition of the 034, SWEL1-035, the anchorage. anchorage has been added.

SWELl -040, SWELl- Provide the name of the SWE's on pg. 3 SWEs are noted on page 3.

048, SWELl-054, SWELl-055, and SWELl-056 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00039, Rev. 0, Page H-3 of 3 ASeismic Walkdown Submittal Report Ent&g Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering IP-RPT-12-00039 Rev.

Title:

Indian Point Energy Center, Unit 3 Seismic Walkdown Report for Report Number 0 Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3:

Seismic Quality Related: :] Yes 23 No Special Notes or Instructions: N/A Comment Section/Page No. Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials AWC-01, AWC-03, SWEL component formatting is not consistent with En- SWEL and AWC sheets have been AWC-07, AWC-08, DC-1 68. It must be SWEL 1-XXX reviewed for consistency with formatting and AWC-12. AWC format needs to be AWC-XXX. and revised as necessary.  ? I-'

A/_- Y-_), I,/

Reviewed By: Pouria Pourghobadi i Date 1 11/14/2012 Resolved By: Paul Huebsch k Site/Department: IPEC/ENERCON Ph. Date: 11/14/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page I-I of 10 CENERCON Excellence-Every project. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Tom Panayotidi for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/13/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ 14Kei ZBesell Alex Smerch Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-2 of 10 EU ENERCON Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Maggie Farah for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-3 of 10 EJ ENERCON Excellence-Everyproject. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Paul Huebsch for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/13/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ Ke v/in Bessell Alex Smerch Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-4 of 10 Ni ENERCON Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Steve Yuan for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-5 of 10

,23 ENERCON Excellence--Every project. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Pouria Pourghobadi for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 9/13/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ 0'in Bessell Alex Smerch Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-6 of 10 rf au~r i1Ir7. '---.I Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ii,

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns

~iI~

June 21, 2012 Dle Rawel K. gassaewm EPRI Mwager.

Sljdurid Rerwbft~ & Wgtit~t ii, iii

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-7 of 10 Certificate of Completion Richard Drake Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 19, 2012 Date Robett K. Kasswamra EPRIMatJ w.aie

&lruchIm ReI~ib&ty &Inrtlvgvy

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-8 of 10

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-9 of 10

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT- 12-00039 Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT I - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES Page 1-10 of 10

~

r.-..

Excellence-Every Projic Every cay.

Certificate of Completion Is hereby granted to.

Nicholas Crispell for successful. conipletion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMM.ENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded- 9/1.3/201,2 in Mt. Arlington, NJ KevniBessell Alex Smerch Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certif ied Seismic Waficdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA -6/13/2012 . . .Palo Alto,.CA -6/1.3/201l2 W .. ........ . ...... ... ..... ...... ............. .. .

ATTACHMENT TO NL-12-168 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-286

NL-12-168 Docket No. 50-286 Attachment Page 1 of 1 List of Regulatory Commitments The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.

Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments.

TYPE (Check One) SCHEDULED COMPLETION COMMITMENT ONE- DATE TIME CONTINUING (If Required)

ACTION COMPLIANCE Entergy will perform walkdowns for equipment On a schedule that could not be inspected as identified in specified in Section Section 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report. 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report On a schedule Entergy will submit an updated Seismic specified in Section Walkdown Report. 6.3 of the Seismic Walkdown Report Entergy will resolve the potentially adverse seismic conditions (i.e., condition reports that identified a potentially adverse seismic condition) as identified in Section 8.2 of the Six months after the Seismic Walkdown Report. These are next refuel outage identified in CR-IP3-2012-3363, 3356 and 3473.