NL-12-167, Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Page C-289 of 434 Through Page D-68 of 203

Enclosure to NL-12-167 Seismic Walkdown Report - Page C-289 of 434 Through Page D-68 of 203

ML12346A346
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	11/20/2012
From:	Huebsch P Enercon Services
To:	Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-167 IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0
Download: ML12346A346 (214)

Text

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-289 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: Y-- NF] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-074 Equipment ID No. EGA1 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #21 Note: South-west anchor Note: East anchors EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-290 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: Y-- NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. EGA8 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YuI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y] NO] UO N/A[I Anchorage of internal components to cabinet could not be inspected as operations is not allowed to open cabinet when cabinet is powered.

Cabinet to be powered down and opened for internalinspection.

Anchorage of cabinet to concrete floor is external to cabinet and was inspected.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM NOIl U[I N/Al]

oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM NEIl UI N/AL]

anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-291 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YEr-I NEI-] UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. EGA8 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NEi U[- N/AIZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[D NO UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NOI-- U- N/Alij Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NiO U[- N/A[:

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall is seismiclly qualified by Computech reportNo. R547.01.

Fluorescentbulbs need to be secured to fixture with wires. CR IP2-2012-06120 tracks installationof wires to tie florescent bulb to fixture. It is judged the hard target inverter will remain operableif the fluorescent bulbs were to fall on it.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI U[ N/A[]

Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U[

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-292 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. EGA8 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: A206640, Rev 10, Arrangement of equipment in cable spreadingroom elev. 33' A WC-004 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/11/2012 Stephen Yuan 10/11/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-293 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Yr-] NFIl US Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. EGA8 Equip. Class 1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 Photographs Note: Note:

10 KVA Static inverter #23 Right side anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-294 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YF-- N-] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-075 Equipment ID No. EGA8 Equip. Class1 16 Equipment Description 10 KVA STATIC INVERTER #23 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-295 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YO- NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. 21EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[A NEJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEJ NEI UEI N/A[-]

Anchorage of components internalto cabinets attached to diesel where not examined. Opening cabinets attached to EDG's needs to be schedueled for the next diesel generatoroutage. Internals are to be inspected when cabinets are opened.

External anchoragewas inspected and is acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U-- N/AL]

oxidation?

Minor surface rust.Accepable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NE] U[JE N/AE]

anchors?

A few minor hairlike cracks. No significant structuralcracks.

'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-296 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YLI NEII UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. 21EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N[D] UrI N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NI U0I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD*

Numerious tubes touch each other. Judged OK.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI uD- N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Refer to A WC-0 11 for partition discussion.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE N[] uD- N/ADl Yes attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-297 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YO NO UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. 21EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[i- UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

West lower airfilters bottom clip does not hold air filter in place. Air can by-pass filter. Operations personnelfixed issue while inspection team was their. OperationsCR IP2-2012-06238 issued for trend tracking resolusion.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 932 1-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generatorbuilding general arrangementplan.

9321-F-18533 (A201351), Control and diesel generatorbuildings foundation plan and details.

AWC-011 r

Evaluate~d hv: Nick Crisnell OA(14ýý Date: 10/15/2012 Stephen Yuan -)A_ 10/15/2012 Dan Nuta 10/15/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-298 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: Yr-E NE-- UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-076 Equipment ID No. 21EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 Photographs Note: Note:

DIESEL GENERATOR NO 21. LOWER AIR FILTER NOT FULLY LATCHED.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-299 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YOI NO- UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-076 Equipment ID No. 21EDG Equip. Class 1 17 EauiDment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 21 Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-300 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 8 Status: YEI NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y['] N[E] U[ N/AE Anchorage of components internal to cabinets attached to diesel where not examined. Opening cabinets attached to EDG's needs to be scheduled for the next diesel generatoroutage. Internals are to be inspected when cabinets are opened.

Southwest of the EDG near the western post of the EDG exhaust pipe there is a base plate missing 1 of 4 anchor bolt nuts. This is judged seismically adequate as this base plate was abandoned from the old EDG exhaust pipe support and now a 4" pipe bears on but is not welded to the base plate.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI U[- N/A[]

oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-301 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YEI NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[I NO UI- N/AE:

anchors?

EDG Pedestalhas some minor hairline cracks that are none structural.

They are not near the anchors. Acceptable.

EDG exhaust pipe is supported on a post frame that also supports fuse panel for 22 Pre Lube Pump, 22 Lube oil HTR, and 22 Jacket Water HTR. This support has damaged & missing grout under the eastern post base plate. LB-11 was issued to resolve.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI- U[- N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE-D U[-] N/A[D A lot of tubing, hoses, etc. touch each other. All occurences where judged acceptable. Some but not all of the occurences are noted below.

-Fuel oil filter line DF-80 touches DF-78 on south west side of 22EDG.

-EDG DLO 13-1 EDG 22 STRNR Vent Stop Valve tubing touches pipe to 22EDLOS.

-EDG JWP-1-1 22EDG PS-I-1 and PS-5-1 stop tubing touches pipe to FE-6469 on east side of 22EDG.

-Line on west side of 22EDG to DLO-539 touches line to DF-107.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-302 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 8 Status: YO- NOI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI U-- N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Refer to AWC-01 I for partition discussion.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI ULI N/A[]

Yes attachedlines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEIUD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-303 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 8 Status: Y-I NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class 1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The following are house keeping issues andjudged acceptable for seismic concerns.

Grating at valve DA-559 DG22 StartingAir Right Side supply is touching valve hand wheel. This is a non- seismic issue.

One of the roof light bulbs is out. CR IP2-2012-06515 issued to track resolution.

Minor surface rust on some threadedrods, bolts, nuts, and other components. Judged acceptable.

Flange on 22EDG JW & LO Coolers cooling WTR outlet has one out of 23 bolts flush with nut. Judged acceptable.

Latch on 22EDG Gauge boardcover panel on north side is not latched. CR IP2-2012-06238 issued to track resolution.

Noted WRT 00172112 was tagged to track resolution of a leak on south east side of diesel.

Evidence of oil leaks below south side of diesel typical for all diesels in area. Judged acceptable.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 932 1-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generatorbuilding general arrangementplan.

CR IP2-2012-06515 CR IP2-2012-06238 WRT 00172112 AWC-011 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell 6r\v( 43 OX1qg Date: 10-15-2012 Steohen Yuan 10-15-2012 Dan Nuta 10-15-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-304 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 8 Status: YE-- NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 Photographs Note: Flange on 22EDG JW & LO Coolers Noxe: Minor surrace corrosion on fiange cooling WTR outlet with flush nut and showing couplings. Possible galvanic corrosion stainless minor surface corrosion. steel pipe and carbon steel bolts.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-305 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 8 Status: YD- NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 Note: Shows fuse panel for 22 Pre Lube rNote: t-xample or tuoIng roucning a pipe.

Pump, 22 Lube oil HTR, and 22 Jacket Water HTR that has damaged & missing grout under the eastern (close) posts base plate.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-306 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 7 of 8 Status: YIj NiL UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 MqUMU; L1udcn on LtUL2 uauge ooaru cover panel on north side is not latched.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-307 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 8 of 8 Status: YLI NEIr UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-077 Equipment ID No. O022EDG Equip. Class1 17 EauiDment DescriDtion DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 22 N11e; uracKea wets on panrionway oeeween Note: Flimsy partitionwall between diesels that diesels. needs verification of seismic design.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-308 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI NEI UH Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. O023EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEA NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NO] UE N/A[

Anchorage of components internalto cabinets attached to diesel where not examined. Opening cabinets attached to EDG's needs to be schedueled for the next diesel generatoroutage. Internals are to be inspected when cabinets are opened.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NE] U[] N/ADJ oxidation?

Surface corrosion. Not significant.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NE] UL N/AEL anchors?

Minor hair line cracks. Not significant.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev, 0, Page C-309 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE] NEIl UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. O023EDG Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] UI- N/AOl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches the SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NO] ur-i potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[Z NEI U[:] N/AE]

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI U-II N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Refer to A WC-0 11 for partitiondiscussion.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UO N/AD Numerious lines touching. Judged acceptable.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-310 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YOI- NO UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. 0023EDG Equip. Class ' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 of 4 airfilter latches do not hold air filter in place. Air can by-pass filter. Operationspersonnel fixed issue in our presence. CR IP2-2012-06238 issued for trend trackingpurposes.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 9321-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generatorbuilding general arrangementplan, AWC-011 Evaluated by:. Nick Crisnell qýý Date: 10/15/2012 Stenhen Yuan A-X'ý- 10/15/2012 Dan Nuta 10/15/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-311 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YOI NOI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-078 Equipment ID No. O023EDG Equip. Class1 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR NO. 23 Photographs Note: Note:

DIESEL GENERATOR NO 23. PERTITION WALL BETWEEN GENERATORS.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-312 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKOOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YIZ NI D U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. INSTRK5 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK 5 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes, the anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[Z NEI UD- N/A[O Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NO UD- N/A]

oxidation?

Yes, the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NLEI LU[- N/AO anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-313 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NRIl U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. INSTRK5 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK 5

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NO U-i N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configurationat the base of the rack is consistent with drawing 9321-F-7003-23 & SQUG (SEWS). The anchorage at the base was observed directly and the anchorage at the top was observed by use of a camera held overhead..

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[:] U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIE ND UfZ N/AD--

The 7' tall Rack 5 is anchored at the top and bottom per drawing 9321-F-7003. There are conduits/tubing fixed on the concrete wall and going into the rack. During a seismic event the rack will move with the concrete wall preventing it from beating against the wall. Conduits entering Rack 5 are attached to the concrete wall which the rack is attached to so conduits and rack will move together during a seismic event.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE-- NED uD N/AED and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The fluorescent light tubes need wires securing them to the fixture to prevent them from falling on the rack in a seismic event. Several fluorescent lights are out and need to be replaced. CR IP2-2012-06483 has been issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NO UD NIAD See response to #7.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-314 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Ni-] UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. INSTRK5 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK 5

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NE] ui--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] UR-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

1. SQUG INSTRUMENT RACK 5

2. DWG 9321-F-7003, Rev 23,(A201097), Transmitter racks piping arrangement-sht.No.2 instrumentation.

3. CR IP2-2012-06483

4. AWC-035 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/25/2012 Pati1 H4iih.,nh / 10/25/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-315 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ Nr-] UL-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-079 Equipment ID No. INSTRK5 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT RACK 5 Photographs Note: View at the top of rack 5 showing the Note: Close up view of far top connection two clip angle supports attachingthe rack to the wall.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-316 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Note: Close up view of near top connection Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-317 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YN NiI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PCV-1139 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description AUX. FWP TURB SUPP PRESS REDUCING VALVE Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 18'-6" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line valve. No anchorageto check.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[-] Nn UD N/A[

Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[I] NED UDl N/AH oxidation?

Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y-I ND UED N/AE anchors?

Not applicable since it is an in-line valve.

I Enter the equipment clas, name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-318 of 434 ATTACHMEI NT9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of.4 IP2 Status: YZ Ni-I UL--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PCV-1139 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description AUX. FWP TURB SUPP PRESS REDUCING VALVE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YiI NDl U0I N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is an in-line valve.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI-] N/ADl Tubing over head between valve and MS-576 is nearto touching control conduits for PCV-1 139. Judged acceptable.

Tubing to IA-1 196 close to control conduit. Judged acceptable.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI UD N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluoresentlight needs wire securing bulb to fixture. CR IP2-2012-06483 issued to track resolution. This is considered a non-seismic issue for this item.

Light bulb out near valve PCV-1 139. CR IP2-2012-06483issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD-- N/ADl Unistruton containment wall neartubing elbow tubing line judged to have adequate flexibility. Tubing clamp is near end of unistrutis judged acceptable due to negligible weight of tubing.

Tubing to MS-576 support near end of unistrut.Judged acceptable given negligible weight of tubing.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-319 of 434 ATTACHMEIN JT9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ N-- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PCV-1139 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description AUX. FWP TURB SUPP PRESS REDUCING VALVE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nil ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Support for P1-1261 is braced from the pipe near wear this valve PCV-1 139 is mounted. This is a non typical design detailthat isjudged acceptablefor a seismic event.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:B226033,Rev 3, Auxiliary boiler feed pump # 22 instrumentpiping detail for PCV- 1139.

B226034, Rev 1, Auxiliary boiler feed pump # 22 instrument control rack detail for PCV-1139.

9321-F-7053,(A201147) Rev 38, Auxiliary boiler feed pump room instrument piping sht.

No. 2 Instrumentation.

CR IP2-2012-06483 AWC-035 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-15-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-15-2012

ýý VZ N)~

Dan Nitda 10-15-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-320 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-080 Equipment ID No. PCV-1139 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description AUX. FWP TURB SUPP PRESS REDUCING VALVE Photographs Note: i-noto snowing tuting above -U V- 77, Note:

that is touching and very close to other components. Judged acceptable given flexibility and weight of tubing.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-321 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NI UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 1P2-EDGB-72-DB6 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE AUXILIARIES CTRL PNL Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YrI NE] UE N/AD Cabinet was not opened for internalinspection. Cabinet can not be opened when powered. Cabinetneeds to be powered down and internals inspected.

External anchorageis present and was inspected. External anchorage is free of bent, brocken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] ulI N/ADl oxidation?

Minor surface corrosion. Judged OK.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI uLD N/AF-anchors?

Flooris coated. No visible cracks.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-322 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YO- NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. 1P2-EDGB-72-DB6 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description EDG BLDG 72'EL ENGINE AUXILIARIES CTRL PNL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I NE] U-- N/AI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YOI N[-] U2 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions. However internal components must be examined when cabinet can be opened.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yo NE] UE] N/AE-Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ N[E] U[-] N/A[D]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Speaker and heateroverheadjudged to be adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo NE] UE- N/AD-Yes attachedlines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[* NE] ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-323 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YDI NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE AUXILIARIES CTRL PNL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[-] U'-l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Top right cover screw is loose. Panel is judged by the walkdown team to be seismicly adequate with missing screw. Operations personnel fixed issue immediately for walkdown team.

References:

Drawings and AWC.

Drawings: 9321-F-3049,Rev 30, Conduit layout diesel generatorbuildingelev 67' and 72' plan.

A209208, Rev 11. Conduit layout diesel generatorbuilding,elev 67' and 72' section 4 Details.

9321-H-2250,Rev 7. Diesel generatorbuilding general arrangementplan.

AWC-011 Evaluated bv: Nick Crisnell Date: 10/15/2012 Stephen Yuan 10/15/2012 Dan Nuta

-:ýmqv(ýh ý-0)mrý-, 10/15/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-324 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Yr-- Nr ] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-081 Equipment ID No. IP2-EDGB-72-DB6 Equip. Class 1 18 Equipment Description EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE AUXILIARIES CTRL PNL Photographs Note: Note:

EDG BLDG 72' EL ENGINE AUXILIARIES CTRL PANEL.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-325 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YO ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. ELJ-1O Equip. Class1 19 Equipment Description EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y['- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NDI UD-- N/ADI Yes, the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UD N/AD-oxidation?

Minor surface rust. Judged OK.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YD- NI LDIE N/A[

anchors?

Anchorage to structural steel, not to concrete.

'Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-326 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NDI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. ELJ-IO Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NEil Ui N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEil uD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NDI UD N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ ND UD N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI U[-D N/AD Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND uDF-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-327 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NI I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. ELJ-IO Equip. Class1 19 Equipment Description EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[il uEi-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-F-1460, (A201195), Rev 15, Diesel GeneratorBuilding Plan, Section and Elevation.

9321-F-3049, Rev 30, Conduit Layout Diesel GeneratorBuilding, Elevation 67' and 72'.

A209208, Rev 11, ConduitLayout Diesel GeneratorBuilding, Elevations 67' and 72' Sections and Details.

AWC-011 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/15/12 qu;ýg r All'-11 rlý;_ 11 exý?ý 10/15/12 Dan Nuta

ý-0)mtý 10/15/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-328 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YEZ Ni D UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-084 Equipment ID No. ELJ-10 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description EDG BLDG THERMOSTAT Photographs No photo due to restriction of EN-DC-217 Note: Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-329 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NF- UF-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98"0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE[-NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEll NEI UEll N/AN Temperature element is inline, and therefore anchorage inspection not applicable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEll NEll uEll NIAN oxidation?

Temperature element is infine, and therefore anchorageinspection not applicable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE-- NEIl UE-- N/AN anchors?

Temperature element is inline, and therefore anchorageinspection not applicable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-330 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YN NR- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UEl N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Temperatureelement is inline, and therefore anchorageinspection not applicable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UI--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NE] UE] N/AE]

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UEi N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall penetration (approximately 4'x 4) is qualified by Computech report R547.01.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI uiE] N/AE]

Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NE] U[I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-331 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NI I UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class1 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:9321-F-1397, Rev 21, (A200204), PrimaryAuxiliary building floor plans and elevations.

9321-F-2592, Rev 38, (A200678), PrimaryAuxiliary buildingcompositepiping arrangementsections sheet no. 7 A WC-025 qlh:(ýg Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 VA-_-

Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-332 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-085 Equipment ID No. TE-130 Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description NON REGHX OUTLET LETDOWN TEMP ELEMENT Photographs Note: Teniperature etement EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-333 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 IP2 Status: YEI- NEI UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PNL PP9 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoracie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[-] NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE- NO] U] N/AE]

Internal anchoragecould not be checked as panel is not allowed to be opened when panel is powered. Panel to be powered down and internal anchorage inspected when possible.

External anchors where inspected and are free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UO N/AE]

oxidation?

No corrosion found on external bolts. Internal bolts could not be observed as panel could not be opened.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-] NE] U N/A[-]

anchors?

Internal bolts could not be observed since panel could not be opened.

No visible cracks at external anchors.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-334 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE] NE] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PNL PP9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NEI UrI: N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] NE] U[

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Cannot be determined since some anchorageis internal to cabinet and door could not be opened.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEi NE U[:] N/AE The 21EDG control panel has a side synch panel. The side synch panel is free to swing on hinge into 21EDG controlpanel. Restraintbracket on bottom of side panel is broken. Operationspersonnel reattached and repairedrestraintbracket immediately in our presence. CR IP2-2012-6207 issued for tracking purposes.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NE]I U] N/A[E]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] uE] N/AE]

Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI uE--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-335 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YO NO UIZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-087 Equipment ID No. PNL PP9 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[I] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Panel on north end of #23 EDG control panel is missing 1 of 24 bolts. Bottom latch of #22 and #23 EDG control panel not lached. Operationspersonnel fixed issues on the spot in our presence. CR IP2-2012-06238 issued for tracking.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generatorbuilding general arrangementplan.

AWC-011 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell qlAk(e9 CXra Date: 10-15-2012 Stephen Yuan

ýA L/ý 10-15-2012 Dan Nuta 10-15-2012 V&K~

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-336 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[-I NZ U[*

(SWC) SWELI-087 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. PNL PP9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description EDG 21 CONTROL PANEL Photographs Note: EDG 21 control panel showing side Synch Note:

panel that is free to swing.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-337 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE-] UI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. EPKI Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description SWPMP#21 STRAINER CONTPNL Location: Bldg. SWSTR PIT Floor El. 5'-9" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NF U[I NIAEi Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

The panel was opened up and internal components were examined and acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO ur N/A[

oxidation?

Slight surface corrosion was observed and is juged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[ UD- N/AD anchors?

Wall is coated. No significant cracks observed.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-338 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ N*] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. EPK1 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description SWPMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- NEI U[-] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIZ N[-i UL-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI] UI] N/AEl Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[I N[:I U[-] N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescentbulb overhead has a plexiglass cover to catch bulb if it falls out of the prongs. No issues noted.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEIl U- N/A[l Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI u-l of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-339 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YIE ND-- UE--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. EPKI Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description SWPMP#21 STRAINER CONTPNL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NE-] UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cover is missing 2 of 10 hold downs. Paneljudged seismically adequate with missing hold downs. CR IP2-2012-06841 issued to fix hold downs.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 932 1-F-2011, Rev 9, General arrangementintake structure plan unit 2.

CR IP2-2012-06841 AWC-013 Ir Evaluated by: Nick Crispell qlhý49 olqýý Date: 10-17-2012 Dan Nuta 10-17-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-340 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NE] Ui'-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. EPK1 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description SW PMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL Photographs Note: missing iarcnes.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-341 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI- Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-088 Equipment ID No. EPK1 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description SWPMP #21 STRAINER CONT PNL Note: Missing latches. Note: Anchorage at bottom of panel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. ?P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-342 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE N-- UFD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. EPG9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS 6A Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI LIu N/A'-

Cabinet door was opened and internalcomponent anchoragewas acceptable.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U0 N/A'-

oxidation?

Minor surface corrosion present. Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NJ U[- N/AD anchors?

Minor crack nearby but not significant. Judged acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name firom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-343 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ NI I UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. EPG9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS 6A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEI UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI uFI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UDI N/AD Yes, soft targetsare free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UDI N/AD--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[Z NO UEl N/ADJ Yes, attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-344 of 434 ATTACHMEI NIT9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NI I UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. EPG9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description REMOTE UNDERVOL TAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS 6A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI- u[-i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-7028, (A201122), Rev 46, Containment Building Instrument Arrangement-Sheet no 2,Instrumentation.

AWC-002 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/9/12 Stepeh Yuan 10/9/12 Dan Nuta 10/9/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-345 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NI-- U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-089 Equipment ID No. EPG9 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description REMOTE UNDERVOLTAGE RELAY CABINET, BUS 6A Photographs Note: EPG9 Cabinet Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-346 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YE N[D Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 22SIP Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 59'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN Nil U[--] N/A'-

Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YER NEI ULi N/AD1 oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Yr NEI UD- N/AD-anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-347 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ ND UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 22SIP E quip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN ND:1 UD- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 167 & 9321-F-1 166.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI U --

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDJ uD- N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND UDI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD- N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-348 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NR URI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 22SIP Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE I--I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawingsand AWC Drawings:9321-F-1 166, Rev. 26, PrimaryAuxiliary Building Concrete Plansat El. 15'-0", 35"-0" &

42'-0" 9321-F-1 167, Rev. 24, PrimaryAuxiliary Building Concrete Plans at El. 59'-0" and 68'-0" AWC-017 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/19/2012 PaulHuebsch 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-349 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N[-- U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 22SIP Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP Photographs

-- 7 Note: SIJ Pump Note: SIJ Pump EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev, 0, Page C-350 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NDi UL--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-090 Equipment ID No. 22SIP Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description 22 SAFETY INJECTION PUMP Note: Typical anchorage Note: Typical anchorage EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-351 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YE ND* UID Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. PNL EPA10 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. FAN HOUSE Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDI NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN ND: U[I- N/ADl Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NDI uDJ N/AD oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NDl UD N/AD]

anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

An abandoned hole near the lower anchorage found about 4" away Not a seismic issue.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-352 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YIE NW I UWl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. PNL EPAIO Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO-- NO Uil N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UWE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UW N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NW UW N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NO UWl N/All Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO uW-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-353 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YN NFD U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. PNL EPAIO Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI uIF--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-1 166, Rev 24, (A200107), PrimaryAuxiliary building concrete plans at elev. 59"-0" and 68'-0".

9321-F-11666, Rev 26, (A200106), PrimaryAuxiliary building concrete plans at elev. 15',35', and 42' A WC-030 Evtelu h  :

J,........

..... ....... Date: 10/24/2012 r

Nick Crisnell qVQ9 1514?ý 10/24/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-354 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YIE NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. PNL EPA10 Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL Photographs Note: Panelidentification Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-355 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YIZ ND1 UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-091 Equipment ID No. PNL EPA1O Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Descrption PAB EXH & CB PRG FAN 21 CONTROL PANEL Note: Open panel EPA 10 /Anchorage.

Replacement bulbs for the panel are laying on the bottom inside of the panel. Walkdown engineers judged this acceptable.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-356 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NDI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 21CCST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TNK Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NDl ULI-- N/AD--

Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NDJ uD-I N/AD-oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE ND-- U[D] N/AD anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-357 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ ND I UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 21CCST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TNK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEil U[i N/AlI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN ND UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE N[I U-1 N/AD-Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UDl N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI UDI N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-358 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ NF-] UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 21CCST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TNK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UWD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-F-2510, (A200627), Rev 49, PrimaryAuxiliary building generalarrangementplans.

A WC-023 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-359 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE N-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 21CCST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TNK Photographs Note: Overview of tank. Note: Overview of tank.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-360 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ NDI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-092 Equipment ID No. 21CCST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TNK Note: Typical anchorageto structuralsteel.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-361 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ Ni I UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 22BAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TANK Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO UEL N/AL]

Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIZ NO UJi N/AD1 oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM NO UD N/AD-anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286. Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-362 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NDI UIF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 22BAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEl Ul-i N/ALI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEil UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIZ NEI UED N/AED Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or stnrctures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[Dur U-I N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

One fluorescent light is burnt out nearby - not a seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06354issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YF NEI UI- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN ND-I UD--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-363 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NR U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 22BAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UiR adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawingsand AWC.

Drawings:9321-F-2510, (A200627), Rev 49, PrimaryAuxiliary buildinggeneralarrangementplans.

684J905 Rev 40, Boric acid tank A WC-023 0Ahý49 I"~eD Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-22-2012

.L-.-.

Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-364 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ Ni-- UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 22BAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TANK Photographs Note: Boric Acid Tank Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-365 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ N- UI-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-093 Equipment ID No. 22BAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description BORIC ACID TANK Note: Typical anchorage. Note: Typical anchorage.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-366 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE I U-Seismic Walk down Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. NTF Floor El. 82'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UI N/AED Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO UL- N/AD oxidation?

Mild corrosion.Acceptable, not a seismic concern.

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y'- NO UiD N/A[D anchors?

Small cracks near bolt nos. 30, 24 & 25. Acceptable, not a seismic concern.

Significant concrete spalling and numerous cracks near bolt nos.

16,17,18,19. See photos below. CR IP2-2012-06547 issued for tracking.LB-03 issued for resolution Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-367 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE N-- UI-Seismic Walk down Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class 1 21 Equipment Description 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UI- N/AE]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageconfigurationmatches drawing 9321-F-1468, Rev 5 and 9321-F-1004, Rev 1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-] NO U[-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No see question 4, and pictures below.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] NO UD N/AD The tank is very close to the nearbyplatform steel structure. Refer to AWC-032 for discussion. LB-07 issued to resolve.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE ND U[I N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Transmissionline above the tank. Acceptable due to enough height Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND UD- N/AED Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[-] NEI UD--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is not free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-368 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NO- UI-Seismic Walk down Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] UnI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 9321-F-1468,Rev 5, Primary and refueling water tanks concrete foundations.

932 1-F-1004,Rev 1 Plan of the entrance roads units 1,2& 3 AWC-032 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/25/2012

ý0 Ir Nick Crisoell 10/25/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-369 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN N[-- UL]

Seismic Walk down Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class 1 21 Equipment Description 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Photographs Note: Tank 0021 RWST view. Note: The tank too close to the platform railing EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-370 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NR Ur Seismic Walk down Checklist (SWC) SWELl-094 Equipment ID No. 0021RWST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description 21 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Note: Significant Spalling and cracks nearbolts 16 Note: The tank valve handle almost touching the and 17 plateform steel and the cut bracing on the platform legs.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-371 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NDI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. CST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. CWST Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEZ NI U-L N/A[D]

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yf] ND UD N/AD-oxidation?

Mild corrosion on the bolt surface, Acceptable, no seismic concern.

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM ND U- N/AD anchors?

Minor cracks due to weather.Acceptable not a seismic concern.

Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-372 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NtW Ui_

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. CST Ec1uip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UW- N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorageconfiguration matches drawing 9321-F-1472-1 Rev I and 9321-F-1004-1 Rev 1.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEZ NEI U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI ur-] N/ADl Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UW- N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI uW N/A[W Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NR UW of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-373 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NFI- U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. CST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NIl URi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawingsand AWC Drawings:9321-F-1472, Rev 1, Condensate waterstorage tank concrete foundation.

9321-F-1004, Rev 1, Plan of entrance roads units no. 1,2 & 3.

AWC-034 Evaluated by: Kirit Parikh Date: 10/25/2012

... .. r .. .ri- ,,1 qlhý49 10/25/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-374 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. CST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Photographs Note: Condensatestorage tank view Note: Anchorage of the storage tank EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-375 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YjN NM- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-095 Equipment ID No. CST Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Note: The view above the storage tank. Note: The soft connections on the storage tank EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-376 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE Ni-- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 21FODT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY TANK NO.21 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 72'-O" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verificationis required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE ND U-I N/AD-Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE ND UD- N/ADl oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[-- ND UO N/A[

anchors?

Anchorage is to structuralsteel not to concrete.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-377 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: Y[ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 21FODT E( quip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY TANK NO.21

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NED UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches calculation 91177-C-02.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NDI uDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UD- N/AD-Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD1 N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD1 N/ADj Yes attachedlines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uDý of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-378 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE Ni UFW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 21FODT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY TANK NO.21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI uLi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Fire piping over top of tank is threadedand has sprinklerheads nearby.

At time of walk down it was not known if system was a dry or wet system. Leaks could occur due to a sesmic event the would leak or spray water onto tank. Water leaking or spraying on tank is judged acceptableas there are no electrical components on tank. See AWC-011 for reference as well as photos below.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC.

Drawings:9321-H-2250, Rev 7, Diesel generatorbuilding generalarrangementplan.

AWC-011 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell q\~~ ~~6jgu Date: 10-16-2012 Steohen Yuan _ _ _ _ _-_ _10-16-2012 Dan Nuta V~N1~ 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-379 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NDi UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-096 Equipment ID No. 21FODT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description F.O. DAY TANK NO. 21 Photographs Note: F.O. Day Tank for 21 EDG Note: Anchorage of tank.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-380 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 21NRHX Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 98'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walk down of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ N[-] UD1 N/AD--

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIZ NDI UD1 N/ADl oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NDI UEJ N/ADl anchors?

Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-381 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NDI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 21NRHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NDI U[I N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SEWS & drawing 9321-F-1169.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorageevaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI UDl N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NDI UDl N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall penetrationis seismicly qualified by Computech report R547.01.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI uD- N/AD-Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-382 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NnI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 21NRHX Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:

9321-F-2510, Rev 49, (A 200627), PrimaryAuxiliary Building GeneralArrangement Plans.

9321-F-1169, Rev 14,(A200109), PrimaryAuxiliary Building Concrete Floor Plan at Elevation 98'.

A WC-025 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell `/ VV &6"-.a _ Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-383 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ Ni] UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 21NRHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 Photographs Note: View of HX from door way into cubical.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-384 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NDI UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-097 Equipment ID No. 21NRHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description NON REGEN HEAT EXCHANGER NO 21 Note: North anchoragepedestal of HX. Note: South anchoragepedestal of HX.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-385 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CCWHEATEXCH NO 21 Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 80'to 98' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verificationis required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIZ NEl UEi N/A-1 Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U-I N/A--

oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion tOhat is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NEI UD1 N/ADl anchors?

Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-386 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 6 IP2 Status: YZ N-F U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CCWHEATEXCH NO 21

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEE NElI UL- N/A--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NOI- UI-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI- U- N/AD On 80' elevation conduit is close to tank with approximately 3/8" gap between tank wall and conduit. Judged ok given tank is a hard target.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI uIU N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescentbulbs need wire securing bulb to fixture. One light bulb is out in the area. Judged ok and not to be seismic concern given hard target tank, valves, and piping in the area. CR IP2-2012-06354 issued to track resolution.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UD N/A[:]

Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-387 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 6 1P2 Status: YZ Nil Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CCWHEATEXCH NO 21 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] N[-] ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-2510, (A200627), Rev 49, PrimaryAuxiliary building general arrangementplans.

9321-F-1169, (A200109), Rev 14, PrimaryAuxiliary building concrete floor plan at elev.

98' A WC-023 Evaluated by: Nick Crisoell qllý(49 Date: 10-22-2012 Dan Nuta

-;ýýýý ý--.ý)az 10-22-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-388 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YEZ ND] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CCWHEA TEXCH NO 21 Photographs Note: CCW HX on 80' elevation. Note: C ceiling.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-389 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NF-] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description CCWHEATEXCH NO 21 Note: Typical anchorage on 80' elevation. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-390 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: YE N[-- UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-098 Equipment ID No. 21CCHX Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CCWHEATEXCH NO 21 Note: Typical anchorageon 98' elevation.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037. Rev. 0. Page C-391 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND I U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. 00221ACA Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqge

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the Rem one YI-- NZ[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The item is an in line component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YD-- NiD uiD N/A[

In line component.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEJ UDl N/A[

oxidation?

In line component.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YDJ NEI UDJ N/AZ anchors?

In line component.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-392 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NFi U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. 0022/ACA Ec uip. Class1 21 Equipment Description INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NDI U[-D N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is in-line.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI uD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes, based on the above anchorage evaluations,the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NDI U-- N/AD Yes, soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The masonry brick wall was seismic qualified by Computech Report no.

R547.01. Therefore, overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIN ND U-- N/AD-Yes, attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes, based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentiallyadverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-393 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YIZ ND- UD--

(SWC) SWELl-099 Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. O0221ACA Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN Ni- UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes, we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawingsand AWC Drawings: 9321-F-3052, Rev 38, Equipment arrangement Control building.

A WC-001 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell 9i VV~C6~ 1~. Date: 10/9/12 Steohen Yuan Yuan 10/9/12 SteDhe Dan Nuta 10/9/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-394 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NF- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-099 Equipment ID No. O0221ACA Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description INST AIR COMP 22 AFTERCOOLER Photographs Note: Inst Air Comp 22 Aftercoller. Note:

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-395 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. O022EDSAT Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description START AIR TANK 22DG Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. 67'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yes the anchorage configuration verificationis required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE] UEL N/AL]

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NED UE] N/AD oxidation?

Minimal surface corrosion on anchors & tank side. Judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NJ UED N/AD1 anchors?

Coating is chipped on concrete pedestaland nearby floor. No noticable cracks of significance where observed. Acceptable.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-396 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND- UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. 0022EDSAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description START AIR TANK 22DG

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NFi U-I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches SQUG (SEWS).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UD' potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NEI uDl N/AD Conduits and unistruts nearby tank are close to touching tank. 1/8" to 1/2" gap on some of the nearby conduits. All occurences arejudged acceptablegiven robustness of conduits and the tank.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U-- N/AD--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI u-- N/AD-Yes attachedlines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI uDý of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-397 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Ni I UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. O022EDSAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description START AIR TANK 22DG Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Fire piping above uses threadedfittings that could leak and spray due to a seismic event. At time of walk down it was not known if the system was a dry or wet system. ff they leak water the tank would remain operable.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-H-2250, Rev 7,Diesel generatorbuilding generalarrangementplan 9321-H-2251, Rev 5, Diesel generatorbuilding generalarrangementsections.

AWC-011 Evaluated by: .'Ztpnhpn Yii;n

ý-A Lý Date: 10-16-2012 Stenhen Yuan Nick Crisoell qk/1ý49 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta

ýý V: -L tz 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-398 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE Ni I UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELI-100 Equipment ID No. O022EDSAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description START AIR TANK 22DG Photographs 7

Note: EDG startingair tank Note: Base plate for startingairtank EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-399 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ N-- UF-D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-100 Equipment ID No. O022EDSAT Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description START AIR TANK 22DG Note: Typical anchorbolt for 22EDSAT Note: Typical anchor bolt for 22EDSAT EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-400 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NW-- UW--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. 21RWPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water PurificationPump 21 and Motor Location: Bldg. PAB Floor El. 68 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configuration verification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM NWJ UWl N/AWl Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI uWl N/AW1 oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YM NEI U[:] N/AW anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name from EPR 11025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-401 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ Nn UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. 21RWPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water PurificationPump 21 and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NDI UZ[I N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 167 & 9321-F-1 166.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI UDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes basedon the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND uI N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI ur- N/AliI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NDI u-- N/A--

Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-402 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NFL UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-O01 Equipment ID No. 21RWPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water PurificationPump 21 and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-1 167, Rev 24, (A200107) PrimaryAuxiliary building concrete plans at elev. 59'-0" and 68'-0".

9321-F-1 166, Rev 6, (A200106), PrimaryAuxiliary building concrete plans at elev. 15'-0", 35'-0" and 42'-0".

AWC-019 6~J~ G/6(~4e~QAj Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-19-2012 Paul Huebsch 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-403 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE-I U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-001 Equipment ID No. 21RWPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water PurificationPump 21 and Motor Photographs Note: 21RWPP Note: 21RWPP EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-404 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NFD U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-O01 Equipment ID No. 21RWPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Refueling Water PurificationPump 21 and Motor EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-405 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 21SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[--

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NDI UlI N/AD--

Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NDI UD1 N/AD--

oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDI UDl N/AD anchors?

Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

I Enter the equipment class name fiom EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-406 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ ND UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 21SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pumo 21 and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NI ULI N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1197.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI u[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NDI UDi N/A--

Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YiD NO UDl N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Light cage nearby looks to be cross threaded (Typical 3 lights). Missing glass dome inside cage (2 lights). CR IP2-2012-06744 tracks resolution of lighting issue.

Masonry block wall next to the SFPexchanger.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UD- N/AD Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-407 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 21SFPP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEIl U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Pump has a boric acid leak showing signs under impeller as well as valves. Boric acid will be resolved by work order tags in the area. Label fell off.

Minor corrosion on structuralbeams overhead. No structuralimpact.

References:

Drawingsand AWC Drawings: 9321-F-2514, Rev 19,Fuel storage building generalarrangementplans and elevations,Unit 2.

9321-F-1197,Rev 8, (A200137), Fuel storage building concrete details sheet 2 AWC-007 Evaluated by:

J Stephen Yuan m

Date: 10/12/12 Nick Crispell " l* J4 I 10/12/12 Dan Nuta 10/12/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-408 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE ND I UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-002 Equipment ID No. 21SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 21 and Motor Photographs Note: SF) Note: SFP Pump EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-409 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ NDi Uti-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 22SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YA NDI U[] N/AF-D Yes the anchorage is free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NDl UD N/AD--

oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YO NDI U[:] N/AD-anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-410 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE] U-ID Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 22SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI U-I N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-1197.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDI uDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NDI uDl N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDi uDl N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NDI UD- N/ADl Yes attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-411 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NDI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 22SFPP Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UDl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Pump has a boric acid leak showing signs under impeller, as well as valves. Leak is being worked by WRT IP2-06-WAJ-24968 per tag near leak. See photos below. This is not a seismic issue as no significant boric acid corosion was observed.

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings: 9321-F-1 197(A200137) Rev 8, Fuel storage building concrete details sheet-2 A WC-007 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10/12/12 r

IAli-r# C.risn f# qlhý-4,9 016ký 10/12/12 Dan Nuta 10/12/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-412 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ Ni U0i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 22SFPP Equip. Class1 5 Equipment Description Spent FuelPit Pump 22 and Motor Photographs Note: Note:

22SFPP BORIC ACID LEAK EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-413 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NE] UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-003 Equipment ID No. 22SFPP Equip. Class 1 5 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Pump 22 and Motor Note: Note:

BORIC ACID LEAK BORIC ACID LEAK EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-414 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YZ NDI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 21SFPHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI UE1 N/Ar-Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI U-- N/AD oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND U/A NWAD anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-415 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ ND URi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 21SFPHX Ecquip. Class1 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UDl N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage matches drawing 9321-F-1 197.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI uDl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI u-ID N/AD Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NZ UD1 N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescentbulbs need to be secured by wires. CR IP2-2012-06741 tracks the resolution. Fallingbulb would break small diametertubes running to heat exchanger in seismic event.

Masonry wall is seismically qualified by computech report R547.01 per SQUG SEWS.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI uDl N/AD:

Yes attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE ND: UD1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-416 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE ND U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 21SFPHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y-I N[9 UD--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Tubing (1/4')runing to CCW-4 is vibratingsignificantly. Its unsupported span length is approximately 6'. CR IP2-2012-06753 track the resolution.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

One of the fluorescent bulb above is out. Needs to be replaced.

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-2514(A200629)Rev 19, Fuel storage building generalarrangementplans and elevations.

9321-F-1 197(A200137) Rev 8, Fuel storage building concrete details,sheet 2 AWC-008 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10/12/12

,5tpnhp.n Vi;nn 10/12/12 Stephen Yuan Dan Nuta 10/12/12 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-417 of 434 A'TACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE N--i UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-004 Equipment ID No. 21SFPHX Equip. Class1 21 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Heat Exchanger Photographs Note: Note:

21 SFHPX One light above is out..

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-418 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 7 IP2 Status: Y] NDI UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraqe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorage configurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN ND Ui-- N/AD Yes the anchorage is free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI u[i N/AD oxidation?

Yes the anchorageis free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEE ND UD- N/ADI anchors?

Yes the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-419 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 7 1P2 Status: YIZ ND UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YDI NDI UI- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDI UL-'

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorage is free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NDI uD- N/ADl Yes soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NDI UD1 N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIN NDI uDl N/ADl Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NDI uDl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-420 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 7 IP2 Status: YE ND] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UnI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and A WC Drawings:9321-F-2514, Rev 19, Fuel storage building general arrangementplans and elevations (Unit no. 2).

AWC-020 Evaluated by: Paul Huebsch Date: 10-19-2012 qWA CA14ýý Ir Nick Crisnell 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-421 of 434 ATrACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 7 IP2 Status: YZ NR Ui-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Spent Fuel PitBridqe Crane Photographs Note: Spent FuelPit Bridge Crane. Note: Tower on Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-422 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 7 IP2 Status: YZ NF- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description Spent FuelPit Bridge Crane Note: Side view of Spent Fuel Pit Bridge Crane EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-423 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 6 of 7 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI UL--]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class' 0 Eouioment DescriDtion Saent FuelPit Bridae Crane qT-T Note: Bottom of mast and operatorplatform.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-424 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 7 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NR UR-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-005 Equipment ID No. SFPBH Equip. Class1 0 EauiDment Descriotion Spent Fuel PitBridae Crane Note: Mast uplift bracket so mast will not Note: Mast uplift bracket so mast will not topple over into the SFP do to a seismic event. topple over into the SFP do to a seismic event.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-425 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NDI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. 40TFSBH Equip. Class1 I Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No, the anchorageconfigurationverification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UDl N/AD1 There are no visible defects.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI uDl N/Ar-oxidation?

There are no visible defects.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDI uDl N/ADl anchors?

Yes, the anchorageis free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchor.

Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-426 of 434 ATT-ACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ N-- UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. 40TFSBH Equip. Class1 1 Equipment Description Fuel Storaqe Buildinq 40/5 Ton Crane

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y['- NEI U[-] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicablesince component is not part of the anchorage configuration verification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E] NEI uEl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] NEI U-- N/AN Not a soft target.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI U[-] N/AD--

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI UEl N/AFE Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-427 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NR UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. 40TFSBH Equip. Class1 1 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings: 9321-F-2514, Rev 19, General arrangementplans and elevations (Unit 2).

9321-F-1306(A200185), Rev 8, Fuel storage building framing plan at roof crane girders and plafform elev. 96-6" AWC-020 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell L111 VV OQqý Date: 10/19/2012 PaulHuebsch _4 10/19/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-428 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ NR UD--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. 40TFSBH Equip. Class1 1 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Photographs Note: View of trolley. Note: View of crane bridge.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-429 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ Ni-- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-006 Equipment ID No. 40TFSBH Equip. Class1 1 Equipment Description Fuel Storage Building 40/5 Ton Crane Note: Generalroofframing and diagphramwas Note:

inspected along with building walls.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-430 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NDI UD-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. 110TFSB Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description EdererCrane (Dry Fuel Storage)

Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 95'-0" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The anchorageconfiguration verification is not required.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIE NI-*IE- N/AD" Yes the anchorageis free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NDI LID] N/AD oxidation?

Yes the anchorage is free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YIZ NDI LID] N/ADl anchors?

Yes the anchorage is free of visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.

IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. 1P-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-431 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment iD No. 110TFSB Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Ederer Crane (Dry Fuel Storage)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y-I NEI UI- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Not applicable since component is not part of the anchorage configurationverification.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ N-- U--I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yes based on the above anchorage evaluations, the anchorageis free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEll NI LiE] N/AN Not a soft target.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NDI uD- N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Yes overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls are not likely to collapse onto the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI uD- N/AD1 Yes attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI U--

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yes based on the above seismic interactionevaluations, the equipment is free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-432 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 1P2 Status: YZ NDI UDý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. 110TFSB Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description EdererCrane (Dry Fuel Storage)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nil Ui-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

References:

Drawings and AWC Drawings:9321-F-2514, Rev 19, Fuel Storage building generalarrangement,plans and elevations.

(Unit no. 2).

A WC-020 Qjz9~ bL6~~

Evaluated by: PaulHuebsch Date: 10-19-2012 qvl4g Nick Cri.qni-l1 10-19-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-433 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YEZ N-- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. 110TFSB Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description EdererCrane (DryFuel Storage)

Photographs Note: Top of crane and trolley. Note: Crane extended to right over top of SFP.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page C-434 of 434 ATTACHMENT 9.6 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2-007 Equipment ID No. 110TFSB Equip. Class1 0 Equipment Description Ederer Crane (DryFuel Storage)

Note: Base of crane and counter weights.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037 Rev. 0 Page D-1 of 203 ATTACHMENT D - AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-2 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YN NEI UL7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL1-017. 019. 024. 051, 058, 059, 099 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UE] N/AE-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NE]I UE N/AE]

significant degraded conditions?

Minor surface corrosion noted. Judged insignificant.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YIE NEI UEI N/AE]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit east of column J8, 10.1 missing anchorbolt to brick wall for conduit for instrument airSOV-1199. No operability issue conduit spans less then 8'. Conduitanchorage condition was documented in CR- IP2-2012-06495.

Conduiteast of column H6, 10.1 missing anchor to brick wall for conduit to IACC TC-1106S. No operabilityissue conduit spans less then 8.

Was documented in CR- IP2-2012-06495.

Unistrutsupporting cable tray overhead half way between instrument air compressor21 and double doors to transformeryardis wrapped with temporary paper and tape preventing inspection of two unistrut joints. Observation was noted in CR IP2-2012-06495and this is not a seismic concern.

All of the above concerns are accepted.

I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-3 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NF- UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-017. 019, 024, 051, 058, 059, 099

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND u-- N/AD spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Masonry (brick & block) walls are in the area are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI uD N/AD-]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Component cooling water in room isjudged to be adequately supported and therefore will not cause flooding or spray interactions.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND uD N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE ND- uD- N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Carts near double doors to transformeryard are adequately secured with chains.

Portable ladderneardouble doors is laid down and secured only on one end allowing other end to slide freely on the floor. Discussed with operationspersonnelin area and they corrected the problem immediately. CR IP2-2012-06495 issued for tracking.

All of the above concerns are acceptable. No seismic concern EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-4 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL1-017. 019, 024, 051, 058, 059, 099

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more seismic concems.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-8-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-8-2012 Dan Nuta 10-8-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-5 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI Ul--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-017, 019, 024, 051, 058, 059, 099 Photographs SOv!a.

Viz99.y uUUI *lmluf ufI Ifumvil dif UIUU. I ubu dfIU fJd/UI rd(JUU UtIIIIUu SOV-1 199. connections supporting cable tray.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-6 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEIl U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-001 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-017, 019, 024, 051. 058, 059, 099 Note: Missing conduit anchoron IAU I (;-

Conduit support spacingjudged acceptable.

CR IP2-2012-06495 issued for tracking.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-7 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YOZ NDI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15"-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-013, 014, 016, 065, 066, 089 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDI UD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UD] N/AD1 significant degraded conditions?

Slight surface corrosion acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NDI UD' N/AD1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-8 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YE Nn UL-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-013, 014, 016, 065, 066, 089

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NEI UI- N/AE spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Masonry (brick & block) walls in the area are seismically qualified per Computech report R547.01.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UD1 N/ADl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Component cooling water in room is judged to be adequately supported and therefore will not cause flooding or spray interactions.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uDl N/ADl interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Portable ladderneardouble doors is laid down and secured only on one end allowing other end to slide freely on the floor. Discussedwith operationspersonnel in area and they corrected the problem in our presence.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-9 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI U[-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-013, 014, 016, 065, 066, 089

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UDEl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more seismic concems.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell 6r\~~C~ ~/qAd Date: 10-8-2012 Steohen Yuan _ _ _ _ _-_ _10-8-2012 VA. O1m Dan Nuta 10-8-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-10 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI UIu Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-002 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 15'-0" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWELI-013, 014, 016, 065, 066, 089 Photographs FIULOU IudUfofy UIXrK WdII. VVwaI ZdfnUWI!n pid(e are not on the entire length of wall.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-1 1 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 5 IP2 Status: YO NDI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWEL1-018, 015, 061, 062 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NDI UD- N/AD:]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO ND uI N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appearsto be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YDI NO uD- N/AD-]

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable tray support frame (over top of 22 MG SE7) appears too close to the conduit west of the frame. The frame might interactwith the conduit.

Additionally the cable tray support frame does not appearto be seismically designed. This is documented in CR-IP2-2012-06498 and evaluated in LB-01.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Some florescent bulbs need wires securing the bulb to the fixture. CR IP2-2012-06120tracks resolution of this issue. Not a seismic issue given location of bulbs and targets in the area. Bulbs are to be secured as a good seismic housekeeping practice.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-12 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 1P2 Status: Y[ NDI UL-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-018, 015, 061, 062

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDl U-- N/AD interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UDI N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NE uDl N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The engine hoist tool located on the north wall needs to be tied more securely to the fixed post. Hoist can roll side to side along wall and impact the nearby instrument rack. See photo below. CR IP2-2012-6135 issued to resolves.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NDI uDý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-13 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-018, 015, 061, 062 A few bolts on equipment cover panels are missing. See photos below. Cover panelsjudged acceptable during seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06155 issued to track resolution. See SWEL1-015 for reference.

Door hold down missing on upper small box. See photos below. Box judged acceptable during a seismic event. CR IP2-2012-06155issued to track resolution.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06155 CR IP2-2012-6135 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell qk,4ýA CXi~u Date: 10-10-2012

)qb&ý Stenhen Yua~n 10-10-2012 Stephen Yuan Dan Nuta

--ýý,ý ý-0)mrý., 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-14 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI- UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-018, 015, 061, 062 Photographs vIUI.=. =fiygtuxHtUit riveuirig yu uu zJw(5uruu iu ui( Note: Panel on west side of reactor/turbinetrip cross bars to prevent movement from left to right in cabinetmissing 2 bolts.

this photo.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-15 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ut]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-003 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-018. 015. 061. 062 Note: Cabinethanging on west side of Note: Cable tray support over top of 22 MG SET reactor/turbinetrip cabinet missing top latch. and next to Reactor Trip Breaker cabinet appears to be none seismically designed and appears to have a seismic separation issue with the conduit pictured. Tray support is the tube steel pictured.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-16 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 012, 018, 067, 072, 073, 074, 075 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDJ U-- N/ADl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

One anchorbolt is missing on baseplate for EL1A & EL4A support along north wall. Plantdrawing 309189-00 allows 3 anchors in this baseplate therefore acceptable.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UD1 N/A--

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NEI U-- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-17 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: Y] NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl-011. 012, 018, 067, 072, 073, 074, 075

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI ULI N/ALI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Some fluorescent bulbs need to be secured to the light fixture with wires and a bulb is missing in the light behind MCC27A. Not a seismic concern given location of bulbs and hard target in the area. CR IP2-2012-06120 securing bulbs to light fixtures for good seismic housekeeping.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI UD1 N/AL]

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI UD1 N/AD-interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YDI NE* UD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Lighting panel 219 door slightly ajar(not closed/latched). Operations personnelshut panel in our presence. CR IP2-2012-06119issued to ensure the issue does not happen again.

23DC PowerPanel door not closed. Latch is broken and latch is missing parts. CR IP2-2012-06117 was issued for tracking.

24DC Power PNL has latches in the open position. Door is shut and multiple other latches on door are in closed position. CR IP2-2012-06117 was issued for tracking.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-18 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI Ui--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 _

SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 012, 018, 067, 072, 073, 074, 075

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No more seismic concems.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-10-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-10-2012 Dan Nuta 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-19 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWEL1-011, 012, 018O 067, 072, 073, 074, 075 Photographs Note: 23DC Power Paneldoor not closed. Latch is Note: 24DC Power PNL has latches in the open broken and latch is missing parts. position. Dooris shut and multiple other latches on door are in closed position.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-20 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YED NEI UI]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-004 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-011, 012, 018, 067, 072, 073, 074, 075 Note: Anchor bolt is missing on baseplate for Note:

EL 1A & EL4A support along north wall.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-21 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 22 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-069 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YN NEI ULi N/A[--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NEI UDl N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipmentin the area appears to be free of significantdegradedconditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NEI UDI N/AD1 raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-22 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 22 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-069

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEil UI-- N/ADI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Some fluorescent bulbs need to be secured to the light fixture with wires. This isjudged not to be a seismic concern given hard target batteries below. CR IP2-2012-06120securing bulbs for good seismic housekeeping.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[R NEI UEl N/AZ interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[O ND- uD1 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NDI uDl N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-23 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NFI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 22 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-069

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEil U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Lose 12" long steel member (construction waist) found lying on floor under the battery rack located in the south-east cornerof room. This is considered to be not a seismic concern. CR IP2-2012-06510 issued to remove the item.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell a Date: 10-10-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-10-2012 Dan Nuta 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-24 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NEI UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-005 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 22 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-069 Photographs Note: Picturescould not be taken while meeting Note:

the proceduralcamera standoff requirements.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-25 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 IP2 Status: Y[ NDI UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-O" Room, Area 1 21 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-068 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UD- N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDI U-J N/A[-]

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipmentin the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YZ NDi UD1 N/AD-raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes basedon a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is ver, large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-26 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 IP2 Status: YN NDI UDl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room,Area 1 21 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELl-068

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDI UIl N/ADl spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

One light needs to have a safety cover. This is not a seismic concern given hard target batteries below light. CR IP2-2012-06120safety cover installationas a good seismic housekeeping practice.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI ur- N/AD1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uD1 N/AD1 interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI uDl N/ADl interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portableequipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-27 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NR UiD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33-0" Room, Area 1 21 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELI-068

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No comments.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-10-20 12 Stephen Yuan 10-10-2012 Dan Nuta 10-10-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-28 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YZ NEI Uti-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-006 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 33'-0" Room, Area 1 21 Battery Room SWEL Components: SWELl-068 Photographs Note: Pictures could not be taken while meeting Note:

the proceduralcamera standoff requirements.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-29 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 6 1P2 Status: YE NO7 UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area 1 SFPPump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NDl Uil N/Al[

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appearsto be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NDI UD- N/A-1 significant degraded conditions?

Minor surface corrosion on pipe hangers in area. Not significant.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NDI U- N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes basedon a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appearsto be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-30 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 6 1P2 Status: YE NEI UEI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area' SFPPump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEl Ul N/ALI spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y] NDI U-i N/ADl interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI ULi N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI uDl N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-31 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 6 1P2 Status: Y[* N~i U[-il (AWC) AWC-007 Area Walk-By Checklist Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area 1 SFPPump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

1. Valve SFP 719A outlet to SFPDemin Stop shows slight surface rust. As well as 2 pipe hangers on the pipe to this valve. Not significant.

2. Top of overhead concrete beam is jagged. Not a structuralissue.

3. Light bulb above 22SFPPump is bumt out. This is not a seismic issue Lights Out Hotline (extension-7600) was contacted regardingthe light out.

4. Light safety cages on all three lights in the room appearto be sitting in the light fixtures incorrectly. They look to be cross threaded. Hard targetpumps would not be rendered inoperable.CR IP2-2012-06744 issued to track fixing the light safety cages.

5. Multiple boric acid leaks noted in the area on SFP pumps. No significantboric acid corrosion observed. Boric acid leaks are already work order tagged in the field for repairs. See photos below.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06744 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell

• Date: 10-12-2012 Stephen Yuan Date: 10/12/2012 Dan Nuta 10-12-2012 EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-32 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 6 IP2 Status: YE NF- UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area 1 SFPPump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 Photographs riuie; tsorncacia iea~ notea in,5vvt:Lz-(uu rorms.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-33 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 6 1P2 Status: YE NI ULIM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area1 SFPPump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-34 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 6 IP2 Status: Y[ NIl- UL]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-007 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 70' Room, Area 1 SFP Pump Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-002, 003 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-35 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 9 IP2 Status: Y[ NO UrI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanqer Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NO Ui-7 N/A[D potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YO NEI UD- N/AL significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significant degraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YO NE U-D N/AL raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Tubing running to the SFP heat exchanger is vibrating significantly.

Long span of approximately 6' for a 1/4" tubing appears to be excessive.

CR IP2-2012-06753issued to investigate vibration fatigue issues and provided seismic adequacy of the long span. See photo below.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-36 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 9 IP2 Status: Y[ NE] UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-O" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[E] UEI N/AE]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] NE UE] NIAE1 interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Tool box is secured such that its restraintchain would load and possibly damage the fire waterpipe shown in photo below. CR IP2-2012-06774 issued to better secure the tool box.

See question 3 and CR IP2-2012-06753for flooding/sprayadequacy of possible leakage from the vibratingsmall diametertubing.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO NE]I UE N/AE]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-37 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 9 IP2 Status: YIZ NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[I NO UI- N/Af]

interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Numerous miscellaneous tools, ladders, stands, etc. under and round stairs are not adequately secured with chains. See multiple photos below. CR IP2-2012-06774 was issued to resolve the issue.

Gas bottle has support chain attached to a moveable ladderon the other side of a concrete column. Ladder is not tight against the column.

This would allow gas bottle to topple in a seismic event. Bottle should be secured around concrete column alone with two chains one high and one low on the bottle. See photos below. CR IP2-2012-06774was issued to resolve the issue.

Magnetic mount for camera doesn't appearadequate for a seismic event. Falling of camera will not effect operationof safety related SSC's however room monitoring for accident response would be lost.

CR IP2-2012-06774issued to determine if camera should be seismically mounted.

Hairline cracks in concrete wall on north side. Cracks are normal concrete cracks and are not structurally significant.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[-] UID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CR IP2-2012-06753 CR IP2-2012-06774 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-38 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 9 1P2 Status: Y[D NEIl U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Evaluated by: Nick Crispell t

• Date: 10/13/2012 Dan Nuta 10/13/2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-39 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 9 IP2 Status: YE NE] U-L Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area' SFP Heat Exchan-ger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Photographs Note: Picture of heat exchanger. Tubing in Note: Tool box secured on left side only could question is in the top right of photo runningfrom the damage the fire waterpipe causing flooding. Tool concrete column to near the gage on the large bore box should be tied back at both left and right sides.

pipe shown.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-40 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 9 IP2 Status: YS NEI- U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-O" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat ExchangerRoom SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Note: Gas bottle secured to moveable ladderon Note: Gas bottle secured to moveable ladder on other side of column. Bottle and laddercan move other side of column. Bottle and ladder can move easily in a seismic event. easily in a seismic event.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-41 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 9 IP2 Status: YE NEIr UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80-O" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Note: Magnetic camera mount es not appear Note: Miscellaneous tools left loose behind 21 seismically adequate. Spent Fuel Pit Pump switch.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-42 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-By CHECKLIST Sheet 8 of 9 IP2 Status: YE NEI UD-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 Note: Unsecured laddernext to stairway.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-43 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 9 of 9 1P2 Status: YE NEI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-008 Location: Bldg. FSB Floor El. 80'-0" Room, Area 1 SFP Heat Exchanger Room SWEL Components: SWEL2-004 oxiw ivumerous unsecurec items unuer stair way. ow; ivumerous unsecurea items unuer stair way.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-1 2-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-44 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 5 1P2 Status: YE Nn U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. AF Floor El. 32-6" Room,Area' SWEL Components: SWELI-035 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[Z NDI UD N/AD-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YZ NDI UD- N/AD:]

significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y[ NDI U[D] N/AD raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-45 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. AF Floor El. 32-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-035

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y-I NN UDl N/AD1 spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Some florescent bulbs need wires securing the bulb to the fixture. CR IP2-2012-06485tracks resolution of this issue.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE N[-] UD- N/A-I interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI UD- N/A-I interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[ NDI uD- N/ADI interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsassociatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporaryinstallations.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-46 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 5 IP2 Status: Y[ NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. AF Floor El. 32-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-035

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NI urI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no otherseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Miscellaneous small items (nuts, bolts, unistrut clamp) found nearoverhead crane trolley door.

CR IP2-2012-06511 issued to clean up.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell *

• Date: 10-12-2012 Stephen Yuan 10-12-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-47 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 5 IP2 Status: YN NEI Ui-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. AF Floor El. 32-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-035 Photographs rIuLm. iMlIUnfiauus DnOILs riuls, dniu unlslFut pans nmue; Miscellaneous DOltS nuts, ana unistrurparts left near overhead trolley door. left near overhead trolley door.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No, IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-48 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 5 IP2 Status: YE NEI UrI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-009 Location: Bldg. AF Floor El. 32-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-035 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-49 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 4 1P2 Status: YE NE I UJE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-010 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-O" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-034 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NDI UD N/A--

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ ND: U-- N/AD' significant degraded conditions?

Yes anchorageof equipment in the area appears to be free of significantdegraded conditions.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN ND'- UD- N/A--

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

'If the room in which the SXTEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-50 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 4 1P2 Status: YIZ NEI UFi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-010 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-034

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEE NW[I u-- N/A-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactionswith other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NWI U-- N/A--

interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NWI U-- N/AD interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[] NEI u~l N/AD1 interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Moveable stairs in area is chain secured on one side. But can roll into nearby small valves by rotating about chain in a seismic event. Piping &

valves judged to survive seismic impact from moveable stairs. CR IP2-2012-06636 issued to better secure movable stairs.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-51 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 4 1P2 Status: YE NEI ur-i Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-010 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-034

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Some fluorescent bulbs need wires securing the bulb to the fixture. CR IP2-2012-06640tracks resolution of this issue.

Insulation in area has been removed from main steam lines for work. This is not a seismic issue.

CR IP2-2012-06638issued to track resolution.

References:

CR IP2-2012-06636 CR IP2-2012-06638 CR IP2-2012-06640 Evaluated by: Stephen Yuan Date: 10-12-2012 Nick Crispell 10-12-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-52 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 4 IP2 Status: YE NEI UE-Z Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-010 Location: Bldg. AFB Floor El. 43'-0" Room, Area1 SWEL Components: SWELI-034 Photographs ne; flOvf*HJK sidirzi nuuirtI tu ou scuITuu. RiUM'- insulatioLn in ared nas oeen remUveU [rum main steam lines for work. This is not a seismic issue. CR IP2-2012-06638 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-53 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet I of 7 1P2 Status: YZ NDI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-011 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036, 037, 047, 060, 076, 077, 078, 081, 084, 087, 096, & 100 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[Z ND1 ULI N/AD-]

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Yes anchorage of equipment in the area appears to be free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YE NEI UI N/AD significant degraded conditions?

Minor surface corrosion.Judged acceptable.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YN N[D] U[D] N/ADI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Conduit above door needs support on west side of door. Conduitgoes to box TPS-5 which is a security box. CR IP2-2012-06235issued to resolve. This is not a seismic concern and therefore is acceptable.

Conduit is located such that failure and falling of the conduit would not affect the function of safety relatedequipment.

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-54 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 7 1P2 Status: YED NDI UD--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-011 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036, 037, 047, 060, 076, 077. 078, 081, 084, 087,096. & 100

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NDI U-I N/AD-spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes it appearsthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause flooding or spray in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDt ULI] N/AD-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Fire protection pipes in the area uses threaded fittings without welding.

The fire protection piping is seismically analyzed, and EDG building is qualified for spray & flooding as discussed in existing operability evaluation attachedto CR IP2-2005-04868 and calculation IP-CALC-06-00039.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[E NDI UD N/AD:]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes it appears that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[Z ND-- UD N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Loose partsscattered aroundplatform in North East corner to EDG building. The Crane hook should be tied off These items are not near safe shutdown SSCs and therefore arejudged acceptableseismically.

Operationsfixed the problems in our presence and CR IP2-2012-06238 was issued for trend tracking.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-55 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 7 IP2 Status: YN NRI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-01 1 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036. 037, 047, 060. 076, 077, 078, 081, 084, 087. 096, & 100

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Partitionsbetween EDG's are shown on drawing 207634. These partitionsbetween EDG's have multiple cracked welds (see photos below). These partitionsare discussed in CR IP2-2003-03195, and seismically qualified in calculation FCX-00534. These partitionsand calculationFCX-00534 require further investigationas cracked welds indicate a problem. CR IP2-2012-06278 issued to track investigation and resolution of the cracked welds. Walk down team judged partitions to be seismically adequate with cracked welds.

Walk down team recommends redesigningthe partitionsto include personnelloads (i.e. handraillateralloads) as observationsshowed most personnelhold onto the ends of the partition when stepping next to the EDG's as the transitionfrom flat grating to the sloped partition base is difficult. Also recommend removing the sloped base as this makes walking next to the EDG's difficult and presents a safety issue.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Gratingsouth of 21 & 22 EDG's have theirbearing bars spanning the wrong direction. Bearing bars span east-west where they do not bear on structuralfloor beams. The bearingbars should be rotated 90 degrees to bear on structuralsteel as the grating is cupping underjust personnelload as the cross wires are bearingall the weight. This is judged not to be a seismic issue but a safety issue. CR IP2-2012-06512 issued to track resolution. It should be noted that this deficiency was previously noted in IP2-2005-03784, IP2-2008-04346, and IP2-2009-0195. Work request No. 00141381 was written in 2008 and work orderIP2-05-01026.

Evaluated by: Nick Crispell Date: 10-15-2012 Steiphen Yuan 10-15-2012 Dan Nuta 10-15-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-56 of 203 ATrACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI UDý Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-01 1 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036, 037, 047, 060, 076, 077, 078, 081,084, 087, 096, & 100 Photographs eoween UfGaI.

between EDG's.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-57 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 7 IP2 Status: YE N[1 U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-011 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl -036, 037, 047, 060, 076. 077. 078. 081. 084. 087, 096, & 100 Note: conduit above door needs support on west side of door. Large conduit above the light shown here. Conduit goes to box TPS-5.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-58 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 7 IP2 Status: YE NEI UFW Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-01 1 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036. 037. 047. 060. 076. 077. 078. 081. 084. 087, 096, & 100 Note: Loose parts scatteredaroundplatform in north east comer of EDG's.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-59 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 7 1P2 Status: YE NEI UI--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-011 Location: Bldg. EDG Floor El. All Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -036. 037, 047. 060. 076, 077. 078, 081. 084. 087. 096. & 100 Note: Picture of grating south of EDG 21 & 22 that has baring bars spanningthe wrong direction. A noticeable plastic deformation cupping of grating has occurredas cross wires are having to span the opening.

EN-DC-1 68 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-60 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 1 of 9 IP2 Status: YZ NOII U-Il Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELI-032 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of YEI NE UD1 N/AEl potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

One pipe is supported from anotherpipe see photo below. This is a non typical pipe support. Design drawings for this support were not available at time of walk down. One pipe (insulatedpipe) runs to the Emergency Domestic truck fill stop valve and the other orange pipes from the EDG building to near 23FOTP. LB-09 issued to resolve.

The overhead pipe near the roof line of the EDG building is supported on three wide flange columns. These columns are supportedon baseplates with some nuts not fully engaged. Typical of all three baseplates. LB-02 issued for resolution.

There is a transmissiontower located to the east of the area that is tall enough to fall into the area of this walk by. The transmission tower is judged to be adequate for seismic loading and therefore is acceptable.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y[ NE] ULI N/All significant degraded conditions?

Grout under base plate for orange pipe west of pump 23FOTPhas multiple cracks and is missing a corner. It is judged acceptable for seismic loading in its existing condition. Cracks should be sealed to prevent further degradation. CR IP2-2012-06847issued to track sealing of the cracks.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-61 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 2 of 9 IP2 Status: YIE NE] UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area' SWEL Components: SWELl-032

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit YE NE] U[] N/A[U raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Spring can on south side of overhead pipe is showing surface rust.

Judged acceptable at this time.

Yes based on a visual inspection from the floor, the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appears to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NEI U-] N/A]

spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatialinteractions with other equipment in the area.

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEI] U] N/AU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area. Additionally the area is an outdoor environment that is designed to be rainedon. Flooding and spray water would runoff the elevated on grade slab and not pool to significant levels in the area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NI] U-] N/AU-]

interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactionsthat could cause a fire in the area.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-62 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 3 of 9 1P2 Status: YE* NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-032

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE NDl UD- N/AED interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Yes the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associatedwith housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NDJ UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Yes we have looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Following items are housekeeping and good practices. They arejudged acceptable (i.e. they do not pose an seismic issues).

A wood stick is left lying on the ground next to the EDG building. See photo below.

CR IP2-2012-06542 issued to track resolution.

Cleartubing running to EDG Fuel Oil Fill level panel is falling out of Unistrut support. See photo below.

CR IP2-2012-06542 issued to track resolution.

On grade slab has numerous cracks of large size. Not a seismic concern and no repairneeded.

A trash bag filled with construction debris was left against the pipe south of 21FOTP. See photo below.

CR IP2-2012-06542 issued to track resolution.

Insulation is missing and damaged on dischargepipe from pump 21 FOTP. See photo below.

CR IP2-2012-06542 issued to track resolution.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-63 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 4 of 9 IP2 Status: YEA NEI- UrL Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 Evaluated by: Nick Crisnell Date: 10-16-2012 Dan Nuta 10-16-2012 EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-64 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 5 of 9 IP2 Status: Y0 NEI- U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-032 Photographs Note: Cracked grout pad under baseplatefor the INULtur. Utter PI'Ve Ili buppUftvU Ituin dflUltiet 'u/juv.

orange pipe. This is a none typical pipe support. One pipe (insulatedpipe) runs to the Emergency Domestic truck fill stop valve and the other orange pipe from the EDG building into ground near 23FOTP.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-65 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 6 of 9 IP2 Status: YE N- UlI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 moxe; Liearruoing iying on grouna snouta De wire tied inside of the horizontalunistrut.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-66 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 7 of 9 IP2 Status: YO NEI ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 Note: Wood stick laying on ground next to EDG Note: I rasn oag Full oF constructionrrasn tying building. next to pump 21FOTP.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-67 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 8 of 9 IP2 Status: Y] NEIl IMr Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77'-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl-032 Iu.PL. JtII (u uUI U iJUUSItu1s 1uIIt UV fuvIIU pipeU Note: Another one of the baseplates for the that do not have full thread engagement. overhead pipe that do not have full thread engagement.

EN-DC-168 REV 0

Engineering Report No. IP-RPT-12-00037, Rev. 0, Page D-68 of 203 ATTACHMENT 9.7 AREA WALK-BY CHECKLIST Sheet 9 of 9 1P2 Status: YE NEI ur-l Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC) AWC-012 Location: Bldg. FOST Floor El. 77-6" Room, Area 1 SWEL Components: SWELl -032 Note: Pipe to pump 21FOTPthat has damaged Note:

and missing insulation.

EN-DC-168 REV 0