ML21274A563

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (14) of Marilyn Mitchell on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21274A563
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/22/2021
From: Matthew Mitchell
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR37346 00014, NRC-2021-0125
Download: ML21274A563 (1)


Text

10/1/21, 3:40 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/45477443-d745-4de2-ab27-c5bb2cf62790 SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 As of: 10/1/21 3:39 PM E-RIDS=ADM-03 Received: September 22, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Richard Guzman, Mary Neely Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. ktv-jjw1-hfk3 Comment (14) Doc. 0002 Publication Date: Comments Due: October 22, 2021 7/15/2021 Submission Type: Web Citation: 86 FR 37346 Docket: NRC-2021-0125 Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Comment On: NRC-2021-0125-0002 Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Document: NRC-2021-0125-DRAFT-0016 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-15068 Submitter Information Name: Marilyn Mitchell Address:

PAWLING, NY, 12564 Email: marilyn.marilynmitchell@gmail.com Phone: 9145399325 General Comment It's imperative that there is oversight to the process of decommissioning the Indian Point power plant.

There needs to be accurate offsite radiation monitoring during the entire transportation journey of the waste to New Mexico. The waste will be travelling through many highly populated areas putting millions of people at risk. Nuclear waste remains a danger well beyond the average person's lifespan so monitoring of radiation must also be planned to continue for generations. Any decommissioning plan must also include the safest possible long term solution to storage of nuclear waste and it appears the plan is to use interim storage. This entails moving the nuclear waste twice and all plans must include radiation monitoring during the second move to permanent storage.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/45477443-d745-4de2-ab27-c5bb2cf62790 1/1