|
---|
Category:CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE (QUESTIONS & ANSWERS)
MONTHYEARML20246D0801989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 14 from ML20246D0501989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 12 from ML20246D0471989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 11 from ML20246D0421989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 10 from ML20246D0331989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 9 from ML20246D0241989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 8 from ML20246D0171989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 7 from ML20246D0021989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 6 from ML20246C9951989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 5 from ML20246C9901989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 4 from ML20246C9561989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 3 from ML20246C9521989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 2 from ML20246C9431989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 1 of 1989-05-11
[Table view] Category:TEXT-BIBLIOGRAPHIC & CATALOGS & INDEXES
MONTHYEARML20246D0801989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 14 from ML20246D0501989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 12 from ML20246D0471989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 11 from ML20246D0421989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 10 from ML20246D0331989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 9 from ML20246D0241989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 8 from ML20246D0171989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 7 from ML20246D0021989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 6 from ML20246C9951989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 5 from ML20246C9901989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 4 from ML20246C9561989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 3 from ML20246C9521989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 2 from ML20246C9431989-05-11011 May 1989 Commission Response to J Bates Subcommittee on Energy & Power Question 1 of ML20206E1451987-03-18018 March 1987 Listing of ECCS Outages for 1986 1989-05-11
[Table view] |
Text
_
~
u.. ..
QUESTION 12 How can it be assumed that this reactor can operate safely with a damaged thermal heat. shield since Edison has not yet installed the proper equipment to facilitate monitoring of adequate reactor core cooling?
ANSWER As noted in our response to Question 11, the licensee is required to install a reactor vessel water level instrument to facilitate monitoring of adequate reactor core cooling by 1991. However, the instrumentation has no connection with operation with the degraded thermal shield. The reactor vessel water level instrument provides useful information to the operators in situations involving loss of coolant (water) from the reactor coolant system but does not provide the necessary thermal shield monitoring for safe operation.
Information on the NRC staff's basis for interim operation is provided in License Amendment No. 127 and the associated Safety Evaluation (attached to Question 3). The necessary operational monitoring of the degraded thermal l shield is provided by a neutron noise monitor and a loose parts monitor system. These systems were required to be in service prior to restart.
l l
l
.I l
l l
8907110225 890616 I PDR COMMS NRCC l CORRESPONDENCE FDC
'