ML20246D042
| ML20246D042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/11/1989 |
| From: | Zech L NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Bates J HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246C933 | List: |
| References | |
| BATES-890511, CCS, NUDOCS 8907110223 | |
| Download: ML20246D042 (1) | |
Text
.__
x.
' QUESTION 10 Why hasn't Edison been required (under the :TMI Action Plan)- to complete the control room ~ design review or the Safety Parameter 1
Display System for San Onofre 17
- ' ANSWER The Detailed Control. Room Design Review (DCRDR) has been completed by the
- licensee, and the NRC staff has recently been discussing with SCE improvements in the implementation schedule for modifications to correct human engineering deficiencies.
I SCE installed a Safety Parameter Display. System (SPDS) in 1981 but is reviewing four options for improving it in response to later NRC guidance. The licensee
. has. proposed a'date of June 1993 for completion of the SPDS upgrade activity.
The DCRDR and SPDS are two of the open items that are discussed in the answer I
t to Question 9.
4 i
I 4
8907110223 890616 I
PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDC L_____________
=_
a
_