ML20238A974

Lists Four Issues Which Ofc of General Counsel Suggests Comanche Peak Rept Review Group Consider as Potentially Having Broader Implications for Region IV

ML20238A974
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	02/17/1987
From:	Goldberg J NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:	Arlotto G NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20237K807	List: IR 05000445/1985007 IR 05000445/1985014 IR 05000445/1986008 IR 05000446/1985011 ML20237K804 ML20237L110 ML20237L125 ML20237L136 ML20237L151 ML20237L159 ML20237L179 ML20237L203 ML20237L268 ML20237L298 ML20237L321 ML20237L367 ML20237L407 ML20237L453 ML20237L464 ML20237L493 ML20237L577 ML20237L797 ML20238A290 ML20238A390 ML20238A485 ML20238A535 ML20238A548 ML20238A573 ML20238A583 ML20238A596 ML20238A609 ML20238A642 ML20238A654 ML20238A667 ML20238A719 ML20238A749 ML20238A782 ML20238A833 ML20238A839 ML20238A868 ML20238A883 ML20238A903 ML20238A923 ML20238A966 ML20238A974 ML20238B015 ML20238B131 ML20238B210 ML20238B251 ML20238B352 ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8708210138
Download: ML20238A974 (2)

Text

-_ __ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ __

. , ($$h' V  %, UNITED STATES 8 n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E j WAfoHINGToN, D C. 20555 .

\.....p' f February 17, 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Guy A. Arlotto, Chairman Comanche Peak Report Review Group (CPRRG)

FROM: Jack R. Goldberg Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement, OGC

SUBJECT:

ISSUES RAISED BY OIA REPORT 86-10 HAVING BROADER IMPLICATIONS FOR REGION IV By memorandum from John Davis to me dated February 9,1987, the CPRRG requested OGC's assistance in addressing the issues raised by OIA Report 86-10 which potentially could have broader implications for Region IV (i.e.,

beyond Comanche Peak).

Prior to your request, OGC reviewed OIA Report 86-10, including its exhib-its , for other purposes. See Memorandum from William C. Parler, General Counsel, to the Commission dated December 23, 1986. Based on that complet-ed review, there are four issues which OGC suggests the CPRRG consider as potentially having broader implications for Region IV. Specifically:

1. Region IV management's interaction with inspectors and its role in re-viewing, revising, and approving inspection reports.

2. The effect on other plants in Region IV of any CPRRG-identified weak-nesses in Region IV's inspection program at Comanche Peak, unlees it is determined that Comanche Peak was inspected differently from j other plants in Region IV. J

3. The effect on other plants in Region IV of any CPRRG-identified deficiencies in Region IV 's resolution of technical issues associated with Comanche Peak.

4. Any CPRRG-identified weaknesses in Region IV's NRC Form 766 system.

OGC has no position on whether these issues in fact have broader implications for Region IV. That judgment, on these and possibly on other issues identi-I 8708210138 B70312 PDR ADOCK0500g5 f _________ _ _______ ______ ___ L

. s-2-

fled by others, must be made by the CPRRG after it has resolved the other issues which it is considering.

Jac R. Goldberg Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement cc: C. Heltemes, AEOD C. Paperiello, Reg. III R. Erickson, NMSS P. McKee, IE D. Crutchfield, NRR R. Hartfield, IRM S. Collins, Reg. I .

i l

i l

" _ _ _ _ ._ ___ __________________________ - __ D

a m,

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _