ML20238A918

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs of Notation Made on Each Draft Rept to Identify Any Substantive Differences as Requested in 860407 Recipient Memo.Matrix Developed to Show Info Requested & Draft Repts Encl.W/O Encl
ML20238A918
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 05/01/1986
From: Phillips H
NRC
To: Westerman T
NRC
Shared Package
ML20237F760 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8708210123
Download: ML20238A918 (1)


Text

-

6 O4 m

t Dockets: 50-445 b/'

May 1, 1986 50-446 Memo for:

T.F.

Westerman, Chief Reactor Safety Branch From H.S. Phillips, Senior Resident Inspector

Subject:

Draft Reports I have made notations on each draft to identify any substan-tive di f ferences as you requested in your memorandum, dated April 7, 1986.

I was unable to submit within the date request-cd because I was on leave; however, I informed you of this and rcquested more time.

I believe this submission is timely, con-l cidering the extension requested.

l A matrix was developed to show the information requested.

This matrix and the draft reports are attached for file.

I clso organized inspector inputs and. inspection backup material cc I intend to keep this information for follow-up of viola-tions and unresolved items.

r H.S.

Phillips ces Resident File Enclosures

1. Westerman Memorandum
2. Matrik
3. Documents submitted to file room 870821J123 070819

..e PDR ADOCK 05000445 g

PDR

..-_--___..--.---.-A

UNffE3 STATES y-

..JCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMIS812N I

i i

neosoN tv t,...../

ett RYAN PLAZA oRivt. SUITE 1000 l

fJWI 101996 HEMORANDUM FOR: Eric H. Johnson, Director Division of Reactor Safety

& Projects THRU:

T. F. Westerinan, Chief, Reactor Safety Branch Y FROM:

Ian Barnes Chief, RIV Comanche Peak Task Group

SUBJECT:

WELD ROD CONTROL FINDING -- NRC INSPECTION REPORT I

50-445/85-14, 50-446/85-11 (APPENDIX D)

It was brought to my attention by Tom Westerman that Shannon Phillips had asserted that someone other than the inspectors had dropad a violation regarding weld rod control from paragraph 7 of Appendix 1 of the subject report.

In that I was the reviewer apparently alluded to in this assertion. I believe it is appropriate that I respond relative to the actual circumstances that led to the dropping of the citation.

i l

1.

On review of the report submitted by Shannon Phillips., I noted that i

he had closed out a previous unresolved ites on weld rod control (446/8502-01) based on (a) extensive review of the subject by the NRC Technical Review Team, and (b) a Region IV inspection in the l

report inspection period which identified no violations or deviation.

See document identified by Shannon Phillips as 3.b. pape 57. When I reached paragraph 7 in my review, I noted that a vio ation was4 identified regarding loose and missing labels on canisters of '

Sandvik electrodes. See page 81 in document identified by Shannon Phillips as 3.b.

.- (

=

2.

I contacted Shannon Phillips and inforined him that the report was unacceptable on this subject; 1.e., closing out an unresolved item on weld rod control based in part, on a current Region IV inspection showing no findings and then hay 1 M a proposed violation on the same subject in the very same report. During this conversation. I told Shannon Phillips that either his unreso' ved item be left open if a violation was truly believed to exist, or the violation be dropped.

In addition I infor1ned Shannon Phillips that I believed the proposed

,xiolation q_s somewhat questionable in that the Region IV inspector

[ Identifiable.Jstated in the report that the meteria was still

$hannon lips inforised me that he would discuss the matter withj-nd would then get back to me.

r o

og

f[i 9

l Ian Barnes x

l 3.

Shannon Phillips contacte

.later.

stated that he had i

)

discussed the subject wit

- nd that they had decided to drop the violation.

I d Shannon Phillips at that time that I did not want the subject dropped, in that labels should not be coming loose from electrode canisters.

I recommended that the matter be referred to Brown and Root Welding Engineering for followup. This referral was then documented in the report.

i Subsequent to issue of the report I checked with Shannon Phillips j

to assure syself that he had contacted Brown and Root on the subject.

He answered in the affirmative.

)

,e i

4.

In summary, the violation ~ was not dropped

  • someone other than I

the inspectoi

.""but,rather by Shannon Phil 1ps with.the apparent j

agreggent of, Jt anyNee. personally did not discuss the subje j

I j

withy

.p f_3 Ian Barnes. Chief RIY Comanche Peak Task Group t

s i

I l

l I

l i

i. ;

t s

~4 i? I N

4 l1 h' i

......,,..~,.,~m..-

.y..._-,.

-.y...,

.n;..,.g,3.-~...,m+...

3.,

.