ML20237L711

Summarizes Telcon W/Individuals Ref by T Young Re Insp of Electrical Trending

ML20237L711
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	01/09/1986
From:	Westerman T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Emerson M NRC
Shared Package
ML20237F760	List: IR 05000445/1980026 IR 05000445/1985018 IR 05000445/1986010 ML20237F757 ML20237K977 ML20237L009 ML20237L052 ML20237L058 ML20237L073 ML20237L183 ML20237L187 ML20237L193 ML20237L212 ML20237L221 ML20237L240 ML20237L244 ML20237L264 ML20237L285 ML20237L293 ML20237L327 ML20237L341 ML20237L352 ML20237L358 ML20237L369 ML20237L386 ML20237L409 ML20237L426 ML20237L431 ML20237L478 ML20237L496 ML20237L507 ML20237L519 ML20237L554 ML20237L564 ML20237L594 ML20237L616 ML20237L623 ML20237L628 ML20237L642 ML20237L652 ML20237L656 ML20237L679 ML20237L705 ML20237L711 ML20237L718 ML20237L754 ML20237L767 ML20237L814 ML20238A011 ML20238A033 ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8708200307
Download: ML20237L711 (2)

Text

W*

4 f

DO NOT DISCLOSE Jamary 9, 1986 E-x a, 67 330.

I5 NEMORArtDUM POR:

Mark Emerson, A1101ation Coordinator TROM:

T. P. Westerman. Chief Comanche Peak Recion IV Group 1

EUBJECT:

A11ecation 4-85-A-121 Individual A & B.I telephoned two individuals referenced by tum Young (Att achment I-was it offered.

Neither individual requested confidentiality nor Project Assistant Corp. Individual A stated he is leaving his present employer j

(PAC) io leaving the site with the termination of the PACand is going to work for TUGCO.

Individual D 1986.

contract on January 17, i

Ecch made the following statements:

Individual A 1.

Stated he had no concerns.

2.

but that he was not aware of any problems with elS l

n ngs t

trending.

ectrical

(

Individual B 1.

l Dio not identify any problems with electrical t rending.

2.

He stated he did have a concern with inspecti of electrical terminations when the lugs were no on records ons same as recorded on the inspection report.

e sign off was for teminal blocks with lugs when the a t brand of terininm1 The inspection block didn't use lugs.

c ual 3.

off the findings since the lugs did not existHe stated o write this did not address the generic problest of i He felt doemmentation.

mproper RIV CPG ENOT DISCLOSE W cte.rmansww O

/9/86 l

h O

5 5

G

~

f i

erson

' DO NOT DISCIDEE Jan. 9, 1986 4.

Re recomunended that the SRRR reject files would identify all unsatisfactory inspector / inspection issues and that these could then be tracked to review QE corrective actions.

5.

He stated he knew of no real hardware problems.

6.

He indicated be did not trust the Safe Team.

T. F. Westerman, Chief Comanche Pea. Region IV Group Encitsures CCs C. Eale w/o att i

i DO NOT DISCIDSE i