ML20237L749
| ML20237L749 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1987 |
| From: | Gad R ROPES & GRAY, TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-#387-4313 OL, NUDOCS 8709090060 | |
| Download: ML20237L749 (39) | |
Text
,,b.
/
stELATED CORRESfM0f#3
: ' 6 f i f
- Filed: August 31, 1987 U+
'87 SEP -2 A10 :29 UNITED STATES CF AMERICA On:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cb is before the j
1 I
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of
)
)
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC
)
Docket Nos. 50-445-OL COMPANY et al.
)
50-446-OL
)
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric (Application for an Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
Operating License)
)
APPLICANTS' SEVENTH PROGRESS REPORT Pursuant to the Board's
" Memorandum and Order (Progress Report and Notice of Available Documents)" entered June 6,
- 1986, the Applicants submit herewith their seventh " Progress Report".
This Progress Repcrt covers the period July 1,
1987 through August 25, 1987.
1.
CPRT Progress The Senior Review Team ("SRT") has approved and published 38 Results Reports (representing 37 Issue Specific Action Plans), as set forth in Attachment 1.
Drafts of four additional Results Reports (Attachment 2) are under consideration by the SRT and are being finalized, while six other Issue Specific Action Plans are in various steps of implementation (Attachment 3).
hCM05000445 60 870s3,1 W
}5 von
r,*-
The overall status of the ISAP Results Reports by discipline is summarized in Attachment 4.
AS this attachment shows, 10 Results Reports are yet to be. published and the breakdown by-l' discipline is as follows:
Number of ISAP Results Reports Discipline Yet To Be Publishqd Electrical 0
i; I'
Civil / Structural 4
Testing 0
Mechanical 2
QA/QC 4
It should be noted that the completed and published ISAP Resultis Reports cover all of the electrical action plans, all of the testing action plans, five of the seven mechanical action
. plans, thirteen of the eighteen QA/QC action plans, and two.of the six civil / structural action plans.
The notice to CASE of the availability of the Working Files for all of the published Results Reports has been made.
Responses
.)
i to the Board's 14 questions have been provided for all but 12 of the published Results Reports and preparation of responses to the B'oard's 14 questions for these 12 Results Reports is in process.
Ten Action Plans remain to be completed and Results Reports published therefor.
All of these Results Reports are expected to be completed (completed, with respect to an action plan, refers to 1
l l
the approval of the Results Report by the SRT) within the third
]
quarter of 1987; however, as noted in prior Progress Reports, the I
CPRT does not work to a project schedule in the normal sense in j
which the term is used.
j i
. i
l l
The CPRT. Program Plan Appendix B. Collective Evaluation Report is in. preparation and is expected to be. published by approximately October 1,
1987.
The DSAP Results Report (DSAP IX) relating. to Large Bore Piping and Pipe Supports also-is expected to be published by October 1, 1987.
.The DSAP Results Reports (DSAP VIII) relating to Cable Tray Hangers and to Train A, B,
and C> 2" Conduit are in preparation and are expected to be completed shortly after DSAP IX.
By' filings dated August 10, 1987 and August.17, 1987, Applicants' completed their responses to the 12 sets of CPRT H
interrogatories propounded by CASE.
On-August-20, 1987, Applicants' filed a " Motion for Establishment of Schedule" requesting that the Board establish a schedule for identification and litigation of such matters as remain to e resolved under Contention 5.
2.
Corrective Action Program By letter dated July 2,
- 1987, TU Electric responded to sixty-five allegations of design and construction deficiencies related to CPSES Units 1 and 2 forwarded to TU Electric by the NRC Staff on May 28, 1987.
In a public meeting in Dallas, Texas, on July 29 and 30, 1987 TU Electric responded to a NRC Staff request for additional information concerning the Corrective Action Program.
Additionally, TU Electric provided an overview of the interrelationship between the Comanche Peak Programs by letter to l
l the NRC Staff on August 20, 1987, i s i
I
The following Generic Issues ' Report was distributed between June'26, 1987 and August'25, 1987:
Large Bore Pipe Stress _and_ Pipe Support Generic Issues Report, Revision 1.
In addition, sixteen Specific Technical Issue Reports were i
produced during this reporting period.
These reports are listed on the attached Annotated Bibliography.
A,s noted in prior Progress Reports, the foregoing information is provided with certain caveats.
The schedules identified are I
not the sort of firm schedules the Board may have had in mind when it issued its memorandum; such schedules do not exist and'will'not i
be created for the CPRT Program.
Some of these dates may slip for a number of reasons' including some conscious decisions.
The next Progress Report will be issued October 30, 1987.
Respectfully submitted, TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY Fo wners of R,~.. _
j
.' ~l D.
)
1 3
i_ u _
j
(
Thomas G.
Dignan, Jr.
R.
K. Gad III
{
William S.
Eggeling Kathryn A.
Selleck ROPES & GRAY 225 Franklin Street Boston, MA 02110 (617) 423-6100 Attorneys for Texas Utilities Electric Company j
l 1 - _ - - _ _ _ _ _
d l
i L
LAW D
LE E
I N
l i
O S
L T
A A
C C
I G
C O
I L
M O
S I
I B
)
e E
c S
E I
i I
w N
T t
O N
D d
N e
SD A
h TN s
RA N
i O
O l
PC I
b PI T
u UM A
P SS L
I U
(
S S
FE S
D S
E T
NS N
E N
R L
I l
O N
U U
NN iS I
O T
S IE E
T I
C E
E V
I L
A T
U R
SW I
B N
A R
DT T
M U
ISR TS S
F LE C
E P
MGA SE T
O EB E
T S
RUP G
S W
L S
S S
E ELE EA E
L S
F Y
N TR V
T S
TK T
A DM E
S O
E L
EC V
EE R
I O
E DATN RA D
O WT N
T L
LNIO CP E
R ES L
O A
S P
E SS EIUI N
R P
KY E
I C
S E
IMDT OA R
P SS S
T I
E R
NC FRNAN CT E
A SS C
F N
S OI EORO A
F FG EE A
I I
T IL DTCAI T
L N
TP N
PT S
E DNN I
I E
AM NN O
L l
i AS APEEA E
TE)
U L
MLSR T
GWT RM EI R
I QR EI TS S
NTF OPW PP MU T
G LT AT ER STNG IEP R
EEI AFIE Y
AS C
RO CA LR I
OR T
LO T
IBIIEEBS TNT ANQV O
TE R
NF SR R
I EE TP R
C ENAALFC.Y EN AN I
R N
I PYO DA TM SU P
LOCRA A
PINGITTT TGI* AN N
TC UQ SU NS I RI A
YCN I
B IDTOOR SAO TSASTRNTSTO ASF STTT NRI RSECESLISGRI AOLD F
SOO Y
CTINN ITSI ETI TEI TENET MTI N DO DIYTA RLEI TTE SAT F
TCSTI CA CBALN D
TLLW EOAE IILLCLE FIF E
T R
FAA OAWSNRABOE LPUWRUUBAQERFLOCOLETLARE OEEER EWAECMBC BEQTODDAV NPOA E
AI AOOD RCCTMI E NI E A
I AR EDNNCO - NM NLPYNTENCFI N
ANNAVIGIRSRR K
EBNOO M
OOEOASTO TO S
ONRAOREVNLBSO 7
I IFII ENN SI ETMCGRRI AAi L 8
l NNC ECCOESSCCIV I OITV TRER NTOLLTOSTVOOSDTE R
O EPLFSCA 9
I NC I AII CGLAWLOTRCTEO 1
RI LN EE NEEACRAIA TPENLLTRIPTNNPCBRTURTT NELTAFNPINEOEDAI l
SCSMOBBI EL EEUPI AECQECCNI WLEI NE DIKPT R
i ABROMTO E
IEIT 5
ETRTFANEPUEPEEGD.GT
- E - E I IUI TSLSVTC 2
ECUI I iCODROTPI TPTEsXXDRDFCN l
I ASTRREENRIANI TGCAENEEOSSI USPTNCDRI UE - LLEL t
ENUGCLLOAUROAOTERRORRRNEULNAAOOUEXOUNA1 I BANFFCBGCCMIl JTTPCPPPI DBPI GMNDAPEiFOV1 E s
l 1
I u
I g
u A
23456781 245 D I
I 2345 1
23451 23423 1
1 E
G T
U aaaaabbbbddbcaaaaabcd ac deaaaaaaaaabbbb E O
L lR E
i D
T I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I VVV VVI I I I I I I I I I I I VI I I I I I I I I I I I VVVVVVVVVVVV 1
I I I I I I I I lllll ll
2 T
NE M
l i
CATTA TR N
S O
I E
T I
G A
IT N
T I
N Y
D E
B L
M I
U N
U C
O B
O I
S D
T N
G
/
A O
N N
R I
I S
O E
T L
N I
D A
D O
T I
C N
I C
S I
A T
E N
F C
P I
O I
I E
S C
L L
P N
A E
S I
R U
U N
E E
Q F
I R
DN R
E T
N U
O I
R ON I
T T
O I A S
C P
TL T
E N
P CP R
P I
U U
O S
S RW 7
P N
R TE 8
E I
A E
SI 9
R B
P NV 1
C E
I OE S
Q R
P CR T
5 L
2 U
S t
E s
R ug T
u R
A P
C I
1 3
I G
U d
e b
c O
R I
I I
I I
I T
I I
I V
V 1
3
- T R
T N
O N
E T
E M
A M
l R
P i
C E
I A
N U
T S
E Q
T T
G E
A N
E M
D M
A N
E E
A L
T E
S L
Y A
T G
N I
I N
I R
V I
E A
L S
T N
C I
T A
O E
L M
I R
C O
T m
D E
A M
S T
t O
R A
N A
O TO l
{
E S
E R
I C
M T
R C
R E
R L
N U
L O
E O
A P
P P
H R
M P
T T
FS F
I U
N OT O
S N
O R
G N
N I
C GO N
EO I
T NP I
GI I
L F
I P M
AT S
U E
O NU M
RC N
D E
ES I
OE A
N T
N T
H TP L
O S
G RL S
SS P
C I
OA N
G S
HR E
DI N
L N
E SE N
N O
A I
D T
A AG I
C C
RA R
N T
I R
C EL C
TI 7
C R
O I
P PV 8
A T
F M
OR R
I I 9
C N
S RE A
EE 1
T E
I I
PP L
CC R
L E
E MP O
EE P
E R
S I U P
RR 5
C 2
tsug uA 9
l i
G c
a d
b b
a U
O R
l I
1 I
V I
1 iT I
I V
I V
1 1
l
=.
NO S
I N
T A
A
.c Fl P
7 OP D
RN EO R
BI I
T P
A 4
1
&CNM
/
. T NAI I 0
3 0
N 2
1 6
N E
M l
lCAT N
T O
R ITAR E
R DT ERI R BESS MDN A
UNOY
/
1 0
N 0
3 NUCB 0
4 YRA M
MU DND S
DAE I
RE T
S EVTS U
BORI T
MRSL UP B
A A
NPYU
/
3 7
T ABP 9
2 8
N 5
S 3
1 TR O
PER RE_
D S
EN T
BI L
ML U
UE ND 0
0 0
0 1
2 1
S E
m R
P A
S I
R EB M
US NPA LS AI P
UF 8
9
' O 9
6 8
1 7
4 1
I 7
8 9
1 S
5 C
2 P
T L
I A
T S
R A
U G
U E
U I
E C
A U
E L
I I
A R
V A
I C
T I
C G
t L
I S
C T
U O
P R
/
L W
C R
P T
L I
I T
F C
l I
I C
L S
I V
E O
3
/
i
.m T
X I
I I
R A
I I
D E
C T
P M
O 1
(!l
r ; p,J v
...#tI e-1 g
(, ;. ;
[
I -
- 3p
- c. o -
f
- ..(3. '._,
4
.. c
.l j
. v j
. ANNOTATED 8 I 8 L I 0 G R A P H.I E S Pursuant to the Board's' Order of June 6,;1986, Applicants submit the-attached
' Annotated Bibliographies:of documents for the time period of June 26 ' 1987 -
August 25,.'1987.. The principles that were utilized,_ the documents that are' annotated and. the document sources. are consistent with the guidelines and procedures that were used by Applica'nts in previo6s Annotated Bibliographies.
1 1
(
t..
l.
I
1 3
During the period of June 26,. 1987 to August 25, 1987, Applicants issued 71' letters to the NRC concerning 67 items which had previously been identified as potentially reportable under 'the provisions of '10 CFR 50.55(e).
The letters-are' categorized as follows:
A.'46' letters'- Interim Report - Evaluation to determine deportability is continuing.
.(No listing provided) 8.'17 letters - Interim Report - Item determined to be reportable and evaluation / corrective action is continuing.
(See listing as follows)
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/1/87.
TXX-6526 CP-83-08 Control Valve Brackets This report was submitted to status evaluations and corrective-action implemented to date regarding deficiencies involving control valve brackets.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 1.
7/6/87 TXX-6555 CP-85-35 Cable Tray Hanger Design 1:
This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving cable tray hanger design.
l l
^
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject j
7/7/87 TXX-6561 CP-85-35 Cable Tray Hanger Design q
This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving the design and construction activities of the L
cable tray support program.
j i
l O
~
i Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/8/87 TXX-6551-CP-85-22 Safeguards Area Fan Coolers This letter transmitted information regarding a deficiency involving the capacity of the present fan cooler design in the Safeguards area to adequately handle the heat ' load in several rooms.. The required information as to description of the problem, safety implication and corrective action is provided-for this issue.
Date Letter No.-
SDAR No.
Subject 7/8/87 TXX-6552 CP-86-51 Anchor Bolts Supplied by Hilti This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving anchor bolts supplied by Hilti.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/15/87 TXX-6566-CP-86-07 Service Water System Leakage This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving weld failure and coating degradation in the Service Water System.
1 Date Letter No.
SOAR No.
Subject 7/17/87
.TXX-6568 CP-86-82 Cable Tray Hanger Splice Weld This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving certain welds which are used to splice cable tray hanger (CTH) channel sections end-to-end to form posts.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/20/87 TXX-6573 CP-86-63 Pipe Support Installations This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a reportable item involving pipe support construction deficiencies.
I i
I j
j f
1
}
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject I
7/21/87 TXX-6581 CP-86-54 Original Design of
)
Control Room Ceiling This litter was submitted to status corrective action implemented to 'date l
!~
regarding a. deficiency = involving the design and installation of the control I
room ceiling..
l I
l Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject l
7/29/87
.TXX-6595 CP-85-42 Thermolog on Conduit Support This report was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a
deficiency involving the possible adverse effect of the substitutica of rectangular and over-sized preformed sections of thermolag on conduit installations.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject.
7/30/87 TXX-6606 CP-86-19 Instrumentation Installations This letter was. submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a reportable item involving the installation of steam service pressure transmitters.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/30/87 TXX-6612 CP-86-10 Electrical Penetration Assemblies This letter was submitted to status corrective action regarding a reportable item involving the electrical penetration assemblies supplied by Bunker Ramo.
Date letter No.
h A No.
Subject 8/3/87 TXX-6613 CP-86-04 Richmond Inserts in Proximity to Embedded Plates This letter was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date 1
regarding a reportable item involving the placement of Richmond inserts in the i
proximity of loaded embedded plates which could compromise the integrity of adjacent shear cones.
j
r 3
1 l
l Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subjec_t
]
'8/3/87
'CP-86-52 Cable Tray Splices /
Connections-j 1
This letter was submitted to status corrective. action implemented to date regarding a~ reportable item involving splices / connections used for cable trays i
1 in Units 1.and 2 of CPSES.
I s
i Date-Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 8/4/87 TXX-6622 CP-86-35 Motor Operators for Manual Valves This letter -was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a reportable item involving the motor operators for. several valves.
in the Main Steam System l
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 8/5/87 TXX-6617 CP-87-12 Containment P/T Analysis Computer Error This letter was submitted to status corrective action implemented to date regarding a deficiency involving a containment presure/ temperature analysis computer error.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 8/12/87 TXX-6625 CP-85-19 Conduit Support Spans This report was submitted to status corrective action and to provide additional technical information involving a deficiency regarding the use of a i
nonrepresentative sample in determining typical conduit span calculations.
1 l
l l
l
. s
.I
w l4 90 C. 5 letters - Final Regort - Deficiency'is not reportable.
(l (See listing as-follows)
~
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 6/29/87 TXX-6544 CP-86-60 Polar Crane Girder and Girder Support Shim Gaps This is.a report of a deficiency involving gaps between the polar crane girder
- support brackets.
Performance of field verifications and measurements on all of Unit i runway girder support brackets indicated that all installations were -
within _ applicable requirements and did not exceed code allowables.
As a result of the field verification results and the adequacy of the load bearing surface as documented, it was concluded that this deficiency is not reportable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55(e).
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 8/5/87 TXX-6620 CP-87-31 Diesel Generator Control Air Regulator This is a final report of a potential deficiency involving the air presure regulator on the IM0 Delaval Diesel Generatort which may have contained manufacturing defects in the'. drip well gasket seating ~surfaces.
Vendor-reports pursuant to 10 CFR Part 21 have confirmed that none of the defective regulators are in use at CPSES, therefore no deficiency existed at CPSES and no report pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e) is required.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 8/7/87 TXX-6626 CP-87-17 Validyne 15 Volt DC Power Supply This is a final report of a deficiency involving the operation of power supplies manufactured by Validyne Engineering Corporation.
Evaluation of this issue for safety significance has confirmed that the specific defective
- omponent is not used in a safety-related application at CPSES.
It was concluded, therefore, that this issue is not reportable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55(e) 6-
____m______.
6
1 l-I Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject L
8/7/87-TXX-6619 CP-87-09 Terminal Studs in PK-2 Test Blocks 1
-This-is a final report of a deficiency involving terminal stuGs in PK-2 test blocks.
Visual inspection and evaluation of applicable diagrams was performed resulting in a determination that failure of a PK-2 test block as installed
- would not cause equipment or system failure.
As an additional measure, existing studs in PK-2. test blocks are being replaced as recommended by General Electric.
Since this deficiency would not have caused a condition adverse.to the safety of plant operations, it is not reportable under the l
provisions of 10 CFR 50.55(e).
1 Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject l.
~ 8/12/87 TX-6642 CP-87-14 System Operability During Testing I
This is a final report of a deficiency involving an. incident in which fire-detection alarm systems were rendered inoperative without proper notification
- of the group vested with responsibility for implementing and maintaining the fire. protection program. A review of the events associated with the incident
' was conducted and an engineering evaluation performed to determine if the incident created' a substantial safety hazard to the extent that there was a major. reduction in the degree of protection provided to ensure the public health and safety..The evaluation concluded that there was no deficiency'in design or construction and no major reduction in the degree of. safety. to the i
public, therefore, the incident is not reportable under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55(e) or 10 CFR Part 21.
l l l b
c D. 3 letters - Final Report - Deficiency is reportable and corrective action taken..
(See listing as follows)
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 6/19/87; TXX-6538 CP87-04 Plug Welding on Embedded Channels This letter transmits a final report of a deficiency involving plug welding on.
embedded ' channels for one of the Unit 2, 6.9 Ky switch gear installations.
The required information oas to description of the problem, safety implications and corrective action for this item is provided in the report.
o Date.
Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/13/87 TXX-6564 CP-86-31 Diesel Generator Lube Oil Sump Tank Foot Valves This letter was transmitted to status corrective action and provide a final report concerning a deficiency involving the possible failure of the rubber facing on ' foot valves mounted in the. diesel gener*ator. lube oil sump tanks.
Date Letter No.
SDAR No.
Subject 7/27/87 TXX-6505 CP-87-23 Conduit Unions This letter transmits a final report of a deficiency involving Class 1E conduit installation runs coupled with unions which were not securely tightened.. The required information as to description of the problem, safety implications and corrective action for this item is provided in the report.
l e u
--_-----_--_o
.. d [
1 p,..
RESPONSES TO MRC INSPECTION REPORTS /
NOTICE OF VIOLATION / NOTICE OF DEVIATION The following correspondence was issued by Applicants to the NRC Region IV,
..j concerning inspection reports, during the period of June 26, 1987 to August i
h 25, 1987:
'Date Letter No.
Subject 6/26/87 TXX-6545 Revised Full Compliance Date-This letter transmitted a revised date of full compliance for NOV, Item C relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/85-18 and 50-446/85-15.
Date Letter No..
Subject 6/30/87 TXX-6481 Revised Responses and Commitment Dates for l
Inspection Reports l
This letter transmitted revised responses to NOV 446/8604-V-03, Item B and a revised date for full compliance for.NOV 446/8604-V-02, Item A (2) relating to
- Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-06 and 50-446/86-04.
Date Letter No.
Subject 6/30/87 TXX-6550 Revised Commitment Date j
This letter transmitted revised commitment date for NOV, Item F relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-03 and 50-446/86-02.
Date Letter No.
Subject l
7/3/87 TXX-6614 Revised Commitment Date This letter transmitted a revised date of full compliance for NOV 445/8416-V-01, item A.
O
-Q-4
r ;,
A Date.
Letter No.
Subject.
7/10/87-
,TXX-6548 Revised Response to
-Notice of Violation This letter transmitted 'a revised response to NOV, Item H relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-03 and 50-446/86-02.
Date.
' Letter No.
Subject 7/13/87:
TXX-6562 Response to Notice Of Violation This letter transmitted a response to NOV, Item A related to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-26 and 50-446/86-22.
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/13/87 TXX-6504 Response to Notice of Violation This letter transmitted a response to NOV, Items A.1.a.
A.1.b, A.1.c.1, A.1.C.2, A.2, A.3 ' and Item B relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-20 and 50-446/86-17.
Date Letter No.
Subject i
7/15/87 TXX-6580 Updated Responses and Revised Commitment Dates For Notice of Deviations This letter transmitted revised commitment dates and updated responses to N00 445/8603-D-13, item E.3.c and N00' 445/8607-0-10, Item 1.2 relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-05, 50-446/86-02, 50-445/86-07 and 50-446/86-05.
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/22/87 TXX-6546 Response to Notice of Deviation 1
l i
This letter transmitted responses to the N0D, Items A and B related to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/87-02 and 50-446/87-02.
)
i
V
- o Date Letter No.'
Subject'
- 7 / 28/87.-
-Revised Response to
!?
' Notice of. Violation This letter transmitted a revised response to NOV, Item F relating to Inspection' Report Nos.'445/8603 and 446/8602.
Date.
Letter No.-
Subject 8/3/87
' Request for information This letter transmitted a response to an NRC staff. request for additional information regarding the response to N0D, item 2 relating to inspection Report Nos.. 50-445/86-08 and:50-446/86-06.
l-Date
' Letter No.
Subject 8/19/87.-
TXX-6655 Revised Response.to Notice of Violation This' letter transmitted a revised response to NOV, item E relating to inspection Report Nos. 50-445/85-14 and 50-446/85-11.
Date Letter No.
. Subject 8/19/87 TXX-6659 Revised Commitment Date This letter transmitted a revised date of full-compliance for NOV, Items C.1 and C.2: relating to Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/86-26 and 50-446/86-22.
. +
k 4
CPRT/ CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
- The' following correspondence was issued by Applicants to the NRC concerning CPRT and/or the Corrective Action Program during the time period of June 26, 198.7 - August 25, 1987:
i Date Letter No.
Subject 6/25/87 TXX-6500 Additional Information on Program Plan Update This' letter transmitted TV Electric's response to the NRC Staff May' 12, 1987.
request for information and clarification of the Program Plan Update.
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/2/87 TXX-6535 Response to Allegations of Design and Construction Deficiencies
. This ' letter transmitted TV Electric's response to sixty-five (65) allegations of. design and construction deficiencies, contained in the NRC Staff letter of May 28, 1987.
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/31/87 TXX-6615 CPRT Checklists This letter transmitted revisions to CPRT Checklists contained in procedure manuals maintained by NRC Staff.
Date Letter No.
Subject 8/3/87 TXX-6479 Large Base Pipe Stress l
and Pipe Support Generic Issues Report j
This letter transmitted revised copies of the large Bore Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Generic Issues Report, Revision 1.
l
.i y
l CYGNA g.
l i
.The following'd of June 26i 1987 '- Augustcorrespondence was issued.by Appli the time perio 25, 1987:
Date Letter No.
'Subj ect '
1 7/23/87 TXX-6598 Cygna, Document. Request i
.\\
- s. :
This: letter transmitted documents requested by Cygna.
Date
' Letter No.
Subject 7/23/87 TXX-6592 Cygna Document Request.
This letter transmitted documents requested by Cygna.
O 13 -
-1
I k
INTERNAL AUDITS
!O The following, internal audit reports of Engineering and Construction activities.were issued during the time period of June'26, 1987
=
' August. 25,: 1987:
Number:
.TCP-87-16
'Date:
05/26-06/04/87 E
Report Date:
07/14/87
. Scope:
This audit was conducted..to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the Hardware Validation Program and ISAP Vll.c, " Construction Reinspection / Documentation Review Plan" Appendixes 25, "Large Bore Pipe Supports Non-Rigid" 27, "Small Bore Pipe Supports" and 29,
" Pipe Whip Restraints".
Number:
.TCP-87-20 06/16/87-06/23/87 Date:
'07/09/87 Report Date:
Scope:
.This audit was conducted to verify compliance ;with program requirements for the installation / modification and inspection of structural steel, anchor bolts and rigging.
Number:
TCP-87-23 Date:-
07/07/87-07/10/87 Report Date:
07/14/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to verify compliance. with program requirements for installation.and inspection of piping supports in Unit II, Welding Engineering and personnel training program.
Number:
TCP-87-26 Date:
07/16/87-07/22/87 Report Date:
08/06/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to assess the adequacy and implementation effectiveness of the current Brown & Root ASME Program on and i.
training for Construction, Administrative, QA/QC and NDE personnel involved in ASME activities. Also the organizational interface between the B&R ASME Program, Construction and Comanche Peak Engineering.
_ L _______ -_.=_ _.____._
Number:
JUMA 87-01 Date:
05/04/87-05/08/87 Report Date:
06/09/87 Scope:
The audit was conducted to verify compliance with QA Program requirements by the TV Electric Quality Assurance Section.
The specific activities audited were:
Internal Audit, Technical Audit
- Program, Vendor Compliance, Quality Engineering, Quality Surveillance and Follow-up of completed Corrective Action frem the previous JUMA 86-01.
Number:
ATP-87-OlT l
Date:
01/26/87-03/06/87 Report Date:
04/20/87 Scope:
The audit was performed to evaluate Ebasco and site efforts in regard to the qualification /requalification of safety-related and Train "C" conduits over 2" in diameter and associated supports and junction boxes.
Number:
ATP-87-02 Date:
02/09/87-02/13/87 Report Date:
03/16/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to assess the adequacy and implementation e,f f ec t i veness of the HVAC Duct and Duct Support Engineeirng Walkdown.
Number:
ATP-87-03 Date:
03/23/87-04/03/87 Report Date:
04/25/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to evaluate the technical adequacy of the Stone & Webster Engineering Unit 1 Large Bore Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Design Validation effort currently being performed at the New York office.
. s
. ie Number:
ATP-87-04 Date:
03/23/87-04/10/87 Report Date:
05/29/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to assess the adequacy and implementation 3,;
' effectiveness of the Cable-Tray-Hanger ~ Design Verification Program.
. Number:
ATP-87-05 Date: ~
01/26/87-03/25/87 Report Date:
04/20/87 Scope:
The audit was ' performed ~ to-evaluate contractor (Impell), Unit 1 and. Unit-2 seismic design qualification efforts in regard to Train "C"
conduits 2 inches. in diameter and under, and associated supports'and junction boxes.
j Number:
ATP-87-06 Date:
04/02/87-04/14/87 Report Date:
05/21/87 Scope:
This' audit-was conducted to assess the adequacy and implementation of the BISCO Quality Assurance Program as part of the resolution of the ISAP II.c corrective actions (Maintenance of Air Gap Between Concrete Structures).
Number:
ATP-87-07 Date:
04/01/87-04/09/87 Report Date:
05/07/87 Scope This audit was conducted to verify portions of implementation of corrective actions relative to Issue Specific Action Plant !.a.1, Heat-Shrinkable Cable Insulation Sleeves.
Number:
ATP-87-08 Date:
03/30/87-04/03/87 Report Date:
05/08/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to assess the adequacy and implementation effectiveness of Impell Corporation's ability to supply CPSES with I
safety and quality related engineering services at their Chicago, Illinois Regional office.
n.
.x 1
a
.t
- i..
k Number:
ATP-87-09 Date:
'04/27/87-05/01/87
' Report Date:
05/15/87 1
~
l
. Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the technical acceptability of Impell's design basis criteria development.
This. audit was based on the Summary Matrix which is. incorporated as ai sectioa of Generic Issues Report (GIR) titled " Evaluation and Resolutioil of l'
Generic Technical Issues for Cable Tray Hanger", Rev. 2, Naated E
March 13, 1987.
The audit was confined to all the' M-Series I
calculations as referenced in above-cited GIR.
i l
Number:
ATP-87-10
\\
i Date:
04/20/87-04/24/87.
Report Date:
05/06/87 l
Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the technical acceptability of l
Impell's design basis criteria development.
This audit was based on the Summary Matrix which is incorporated as a section of-Generic. Issues Report (GIR)' titles " Evaluation and Resolution of I
Generic Technical Issues for Cable Tray Hangers", Rev. 2, dated '
y March 13, 1987.
The audit was confined to all the M-Series calculations as referenced in above-cited GIR.
Number:
ATP-87-11 Date:
04/27/87-05/01-87 l
Report'Date:
05/15/87 Scope:
This audit was performed at Impell's Fort Worth office to evaluate 1
the technical adequacy of Impell's preparation and review 'of seismic equipment qualification packages.
This effort by Impell 1
is to assure that qualification has been properly established and documented and is sufficiently organized to permit proper maintenance after turnover to TV Electric.
Number:
ATP-87-12 3
Date:
04/27/87-05/04-87
)
Report Date:
05/15/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted to verify portions of corrective actions implemented for Issue Specific Action Plan VII.b.2, Valve Disassembly.
i l
A
iC i
Y LNumber:
ATP-87-13 Date:.
05/18/87-05/22/87 Report Date:
06/04/87 Scope:
This audit was performed at the Boston ' office of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation to evaluate the technical ' adequacy of specific activities associated. with the' CPSES Design Basis Consolidation Program in the Civil / Structural and Engineering.
Mechanics Disciplines.
Number:
ATP-87-14 Date:
04/06/87 Report Date: '
05/05/87 Scope:
'This audit 'was conducted to assess a portion of the Stone &
Webster Engineering Corporation implementation of their. technical procedures for Large Bore Piping Analysis and Support Design.
Number:
ATP-87-15 Date:'
05/18/87-05/22/87 Report Date:
06/09/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the technical adequacy of Stone-
&. Webster Engineering Corporation's * (SWEC's) design validation activities' in the areas of Nuclear Technology and Power Engineering (Mechanical Design) at Boston for the Comanche Peak
- Steam Electric Station.
This design validation effort includes resolution of issues discussed in SWEC's Mechanical Generic Issues Report.
Number:
ATP-87-16 Date:.
06/01/87-06/05/87 Report Date:
'06/29/87 Scope:-
This audit was performed to evaluate the Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
Corrective Action Program (SWEC-CAP) for Electrical Design Basis Consoldiation Program activities at the SWEC-Boston, offices.
Hcua..
E-b:
Number:
'ATP-87-17 Date:
06/01/87-06/05/87 Report Date:
06/29/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to evaluate SWEC-CAP efforts with. respect to the ' Instrumentation and Control Design ' Basis Consolidation Prograi at the SWEC-Boston, offices.
Mm.
~
Number:
ATP-87-18' Date:
06/01/87-06/05/87 Report Date:
06/26/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the effectiveness and techncial adequacy of the' SWEC Unit 1 Pipe Stress and Support' design validation activities at the Comanche. Peak Steam Electric Station site.
Number:
ATP-87-19 Date:
06/15/87-06/19/87 l
Report Date:
06/29/87 Scope:
This audit was performed 't o tevaluate the technical adequacy of Ebasco Conduit Support and. Cable Tray Hanger design validation i
activities at their New ' York, New York and Lyndhurst, New Jersey facilities.
4 Number:
ATP-87-20 Date:
06/22/87-06/26/87 Report Date:
- 07/14/87 Scope
This$udit was performed ~ at the Impell Corporation CPSES site office to verify implementation of ir..pel l technical-and design control requirements for CPSES Fire Prctection.
I i
1 c
i I
1 1
\\
l g
r'
~
?
4, f
'f' '
r l
)
3 )
1 j
3 Number:
ATP-87-21 Date:
'06/22/87-06/26/87 Report.Datei 07/16/87' g
Scope:.
This ' audit-was performed at the SWEC-Boston, M office to assess,. the. technical adequacy of ~ design validation activities associated with the CPSES' Design Basis Consolidation Program in the ' Nuclear Technology.and Power ~- Engineering (Mechanical)
' disciplines.
Number:
ATP-87-22.
Date:
06/15/87-06/19/87 Report Date:
07/15/87 Scope:
This audit. was; performed at 'Impell's Fort Worth, Texas office' to assess technical adequacy of Impell development and implementation of methodologies for
_ environmental qualification including adequacy of qualification basis documentation. and accuracy 'of
' interfacing wi.th other organizations.
Number:
ATP-87-23 Date:.
.06/15/87-06/19/87 Report Date:
07/02/87 Scope.
This audit was performed at'Ebasco's New York, New York office to e' valuate the techncial adequacy of the CPSES HVAC Systems Design
.I Validation Program.
{
l l
Number:
ATP-87-28 t
Date:-
06/29/87-07/14/87 Report Date:
07/24/87 Scope:
This. audit was performed at the SWEC CPSES site (field) and New York, New York offices to evaluate the technical' adequacy of SWEC pipe stress and pipe support design validation activities.
I L
'1 )
J
[.-
. Number:
ATP-87-29 Date:
07/13/87-07/17/87 Report Date:
.08/03/87 y gy%,
s Scope:
This ' audit was performed at the SWEC-CAP Boston, M office to evaluate the 'techncial ' adequacy of the CPSES Electrical Design Basis' Consolidation Program.
L Number:
ATP-87-30 Date:
07/13/87-07/20/87 Repo'rt Date:-
08/10/87 y
g m.
Scope:
This audit was performed at the SWEC-CAP Boston, office to evaluate the ' technical adequacy of the CPSES Instrumentation and Control Design Basis Consolidation Program.
Number:
ATP-87-31' Date:.
07/20/87-07/24/87
-Report Date:
08/13/87 Scope:
This audit was performed at Ebasco's New York, New York office to.
assess the technical' adequacy of design validation activities for l
HVAC ducts and duct supports.
Number:
ATP-87-32 Date:
07/20/87-07/24/87 Report Date:
08/12/87 l
Scope:
This audit was performed at Ebasco's New York, New York office to evaluate the techncial adequacy of Ebasco conduit support system design validation activities.
Number:
ATP-87-33 Date:
07/13/87-07/17/87 Report Date:
08/05/87 Scope:
This audit was performed at the Impell Corporation Fort Worth, Texas office to evaluate the technical adequacy of activities associated with Impell seismic equipment qualification validation and QA program implementation.
_ L________--_
A
.w Number:
ATP-87-35 Date:
07/27/87-08/03/87 Report'Date:
08/13/87 Scope:
This audit : was performed at the Ebasco CPSES site engineering office to' evaluate the techncial adequacy of Unit 1 and Common Conduit. Systems design validation activities.
Number:
ATP-87-36 Date:
04/30/87
' Report Date:
06/15/87 Scope:
This audit was conducted ' to assess a portion of the Ebasco implementation' of t.he i r techncial procedures for Cable Tray-Support Design.
. Number:
ATP-87-504 Date:
05/26/87-06/04/87 Report Date:
07/15/87 Scope:
'This audit was performed at the CPSES construction site to assess the adequacy and implementation effectiveness of the Hardware-Validation Program and of Issue Specific Action Plan VII.c,
" Construction Reinspection / Documentation ' Review Plan", Appendices 25 (Large Bore Pipe Supports Rigid), 26 (Large Bore Pipe Supports Non-Rigid), 27 (Small Bore Pipe Supports) and 29 (Pipe Whip' Restraints).
Number:
ATP-87-505 Date:
06/01/87-06/10/87 Report Date:
07/15/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to verify effective implementation-of recommended corrective. action and ongoing activities defined in the. CPRT Results Report pertaining to ISAP VII.a.7, Rev.1,
" Housekeeping and System Cleanliness.
j
~
l, a
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - _ _ _ = _ _ _
}
(f tNumber:
ATP-87-506 Date:
06/08/87-06/16/87 Report Date:
07/15/87 i
)
Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the adequacy and implementation
)
of corrective actions taken in response to recommendations of ISAP j
.VII.c, Appendix 23 Results Report (preliminary) related to 1
Stainless Steel. Tank Liners.
Number:
ATP-87-507 l
Date:
06/15/87-06/23/87 Report Date:.
07/22/87 L
Scope:
This audit was performed to. verify effective implementation of recommended corrective action and ongoing activities set forth in CPRT Results Reports pertaining to ISAP I.a.2 (Inspection Reports on Butt Splices) and ISAP I.a.3 (Butt Splice Qualification).
Number:
ATP-87-513 Date:
07/13/87-07/21/87 Report Date:
08/04/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to verify effective implementation of ISAP commitment ID No. ISAP-VII.a.3-0,01 (CPRT Commitment Tracking Report) originating from CPRT Results Report ISAP - VII a.3, Rev.
1, " Document Control".
Number:
ATP-87-516 Date:
07/20/87-07/31/87 1
Report Date:
08/13/87 Scope:
This audit was performed to assess the adequacy and implementation of corrective actions taken in response to commitments contained in' CPRT Commitment Tracking Report for ISAP VII.b.1, "0nsite.
Fabrication",
t i _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _.
A
I MISCELLANE0US j.
t-L l
The following additione: correspondence was issued by Applicants to the NRC during the time period of June 26, 1987 - August 25,.1987:
Date.
Letter No.
Subject 6/25/87 TXX-6547 Transmittal of Final Safety Analysis Report This letter transmitted an updated FSAR'to the NRC, per their request.
Date Letter No.
Subject 6/30/87 TXX-6539 Advance FSAR Change This letter transmitted revisions to Table 3.2-1 of the FSAR in advance of their incorporation in to Amendment 64.
Date Letter No.
. Subject 7/15/87 TXX-6575 Arbitrary Intermediate Pipe Breaks This letter transmitted a final response.to the NRC's September 11, 1986 Request for Additional Infromation concerning elimination of arbitrary intermediate pipe breaks.
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/16/87 TXX-6577 Revised Emergency Plan Procedure This' letter transmitted a copy of revised Emergency Plan Procedure, EPP-108, Revision 5, to the NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.4 and 50.54 (q).
i
! 4
Date Letter No.
Subject 7/21/87 TXX-6476 FSAR Table.17A-1 This' letter transmitted TV Electrics' response to NRC Staff concerns regarding revisions to FSAR Table 17A-l'in Amendment 59.
Date' Lett'er No.
Subject 8/3/87 TXX-6621 00E Form _EIA-858 This letter transmitted DOE Form EIA-858, Uranimum Industry Annual Survey
'. Schedule 8, to the V. S. Department of Energy.
Date Letter No.
Subject 8/3/87 TXX-6570 FSAR Amendment 64 This letter transmitted Amendment 64 to CPSES FSAR.
Date-Letter No.
Subject 8/3/87 TXX-6571 Amendment 64 Description This letter transmitted a description of Amendment 64 to the CPSES FSAR.
Date Letter No.
Subject 8/4/87 TXX-6582 Fire Protection Program This letter provided information and clarifying material to the NRC concerning the CPSES Fire Protection Program.
Date Letter No.
Subject i
i 8/12/87 TXX-6634 Tranmittal of DOE Form j
EIA-254 j
This letter transmitted to the Energy Information Administration Copies of DOE form EIA-254, " Semi-annual Report on Status of Reactc,r Construction" for CPSES Units 1 and 2.
i,
t
----------------__-------j
1 0THER 0n behalf of,Tlf Electric, R. A. Wooldridge has-submitted various documents to the ASLB for their information.
These documents include the following for the-time' period of June 26,L1987 ' August 25, 1987:
7/8/87 Transmittal of Approved Results Report for ISAP III.a.1, Hot Functional Testing, Rev. 1~and-TXX-6559.
7/23/87 Transmittal of documents related to the MAC Report and associated supplemental affidavits.
a 7/24/87
. Transmittal of TXX-6598.which provided information requested by CYGNA.
8/3/87 Tranmit'tal of TXX-6479 which.provided copies of the "Large Bore Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Generic Issue Report,-Rev.1".
M w Y
1 i
The following reports were issued by the CPRT Overview Quality Team (00T) during the time period of June 26, 1987 - August 25, 1987:
f I
I 7/17/87 000-249 - Internal memo from J. F. Streeter to J. W. Beck transmitting a report entitled " Follow Up Actions Recommended in 0QT Final Report".
a l A_-- -_
C,,
The. following listing represents the consultants' reports received by CPSES' Engineering during the' time period of June 2,6, 1987 - August.25,.1987:
Specific Technical Issue Report'for Hardened Washers CPSES-Units 1 & 2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Building Separation Gaps CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Seismic Design of Control Room Ceiling, CPSES Unit 1 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Commodities Attached to Secondary Walls, CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Welds Associated with l
Tubular Members CPSES Units 1'& 2 TUE i
Configuration Control of the Fire Protection Program TUE'
{
3 Specific Technical Issue Report for Issues Concerning Missing Rebars CPSES, Units 1 &-2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Concrete Voids / Inadequate Consolidation,n CPSES TUE CCL Test Report A-746-87 TUE Comprehens1ve Radwaste Management Study CPSES TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Per Cent Fill and-Identification of Thru-Floor and Thru-Wall Sleeves:CPSES Units 1 & 2 TVE Specific Technical Issue Report for STIR-CPRT-S-018 Commodity Clearance CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report STIR-CPRT-S-008 ISAP II.d CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Seismic Qualification Report CPSES TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for Traceability of IE Pigtail Extensions and Reducing Low Voltage Power Cable at Equipment CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Final Report on CPSES Tornado Venting Design Basis l-Validation CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE
. L
[F
~
I i
3; g
Specific Technical ' Issue Report for. Threaded Fasteners, CPSES. Units 1 & 2 TUE Information on Welds Specific Technical Issue Report for Heat Shrinkable Sleeve Installation CPSES Units 1 & 2 TVE FSSA Compliance Meth'odolgy Coating -Inspection Inside 108' Tail Pieces of Circulating Water Piping Report # LN-282 Cable Tray Clamp CPSES TVE
. Specific Technical. Issue Report for Reactor Building' Polar-Crane CPSES Unit 1 & 2 TUE Meteorological
_ Tower -Representativeness Study Final Midterm Report CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Reactor Coolant Pump Addenda Stress Reports Fuel Rack-Licensing Report CPSES Specific Techncial Issue Report for Equipment Internal Separation CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Specific Technical Issue Report for AMP-Preinsulated' Environmental Sealed Butt Splices on control and Instrument Conductors CPSES Units 1 & 2 TUE Status Report' for Equipment Nozzle Loads and Stiffness Matrices CPSES TUE Unit #2 Condenser Waterbox Coating Inspection i
s i
4
. i
/
^ [I_ e [ I [ "
U :% i CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
,87 SEP -2 A10 :29' I, R.
K.
Gad III, hereby certify i.lat on August 31, 1987, DCCh i
I made service of " Applicants' Seventh Progress Report $ by mailing copies thereof, postage prepaid, to:
Peter B. Bloch, Esquire Mr. James E. Cummins Chairman Resident Inspector Administrative Judge Comanche Peak S.E.S.
Atomic Safety and Licensing c/o U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Board Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory P. O.
Box 38 Commission Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Walter H. Jordan Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Administrative Judge GAP-Midwest Office 881 W. Outer Drive 104 E. Wisconsin Ave.
-B Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Appleton, WI 54911-4897 Chairman Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel Board Panel U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Lawrence J.
Chandler, Esquire Mrs. Juanita Ellis Office of the Executive President, CASE Legal Director 1426 S.
Polk Street U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Dallas, Texas 75224 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Renea Hicks, Esquire Ellen Ginsburg, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Environmental Protection Division Board Panel P.
O.
Box 12548 U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory I
Capitol Station Commission Austin, Texas 78711 Washington, D.C.
20555 f
l l
l l
j l
i s
_____.________.__.m.__
i 1
Anthony Roisman,-Esquire Mr. Lanny A. Sinkin Suite 600 Christic Institute 1
1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
1324 North Capitol Street I
Washington, D.C.
20005 Washington, D.C.
20002 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom Mr. Robert D. Martin Administrative Judge Regional Administrator 1107 West Knapp Region IV i
Stillwater, Oklahoma-74075 U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 1000 1
611 Ryan Plaza Drive -
Arlington, Texas 76011 Elizabeth B. Johaison Geary S. Mizuno, Esquire Administrative Judge Office of the Executive Oak Ridge National Laboratory Legal Director P.
O.. Box X, Building 3500 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Commission i
Washington, D.C.
20555 j
Nancy H. Williams 2121 N. California Blvd.
Suite 390 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(
s k ;e_
I Gap /III R'.
K.
i l
..