ML20237K595

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to QAI-2, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Quality Administrative Instruction for Documentation Turnover (File Inventory)
ML20237K595
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/21/1983
From: Wilson L
HOWARD P. FOLEY CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20237K209 List:
References
FOIA-84-743 QAI-2, NUDOCS 8708190327
Download: ML20237K595 (8)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.

S QSf I _.

VI: M I.

J,QAI-2

["

auna y

J.

u

  • /

REV.1 5

".'..'v_b; ' -4

~ els-T.;a....-

6 NWS=...+I!!Ol8dMESE[ND DATE: 12-21-8' i

DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT QUALITY. ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION t

FOR l

DOCUMENTATION TURNOVER (FILE INVENTORY) l l

l THE l.

HOWARD P. FOLEY r

COMPANY l

P. O. BCX 2 7.

. AV;LA GEACH, CALIF.

9 34 4 835 595 737' Cmess:

ALLENTC'AN PENNSRYAN'A B ALTMO AE. MA AYLAND V fg

/

l CHICAGO tLLINO S 7

4 DATE: /0 J '/ / 2 C AL_A S. T EXA s APPROVED: c5 f

/

DAM $8U 3. PENNSYLVAN' A sousics.u xas Quality Director

. LOS 2.GELES. CAL?OAN A l

UAM NEZ CAtlFCAN:A MIVD*S. TENNESSEE Ne','. C c.e_ANS. LCU'S. A N 4

~*

~.*n'fLi*,

_.N'? ~ PENNSYLV AN'A~

~~~ ~

~

~~

- - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - -

-~4~--

F OENIX. A=:*C'. A l

P'TTSBUAG-PENNS'iL\\ AN:A R.CnVOND viA$N-A SALT '.AKE CITY. UTA-4 Ta v= A. ric A : A THE HOWARD P.

FOLEY COMPANY l

Tees:N An :.*

v,As,r.27:N o :.

i

.m a s
sca c 8708190327 870814 PDR FOIA

.. :y 4.e==

a DEVINE84-743 PDR

. _,,k

s I

1'. i i

i

)

.1 l

1

'i 1

1 i

f QAI !

~

r REV.1, Changes Made to QAI-2 l1 Documentation. Turnover (File Inve1 tory) l l

e Revision 1 1

This instruction has been completely revised:

1)

Deleted Data Input / Checklist j

2).

Deleted Records Sealing 3)

Deleted File Follower I

4)

Added File Inventory 1

AA A._

m T-

,1 I

d i

THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY l

1

, - -. ~.., -..,.

... ~ ~.. -..

.. _ - - ~. _..... ~ - -... _.. _. _.. _

l i

i i

I_-~ -,... - -. - - -,, - ~.. -. -,,...,.

[

j i

~

H l

l.

SCOPE This instruction describes the method to be used to inventory and document the review of Quality 1

Assurance Records in preparation for turnover to the customer.

-QAI _

j REV.1 2.

PURPOSE 1

.The purpose of the instruction is to assure that Quality Assurance Records within each file have been identified and signed-off as being reviewec.

I 3.

RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 The Document Review Supervisor is responsible for the implementation of this instruction.

l 3.2 The Document Review Analyst is responsible for the review of records in preparation for vaulting in the Records Management System and/or subsequent turnover to the Customer.

4.

METHOD 4.1 Quality Assurance Records from September of 1981 forward shall be reviewed for completeness

=~(ez

,and correctness prior to turnover to the Customer, p Il This review shall be indicated through the use of

_r a File Inventory Record (Exhibit 1).

j xx 4.2 Turnover documents shall be listed on the THE File Inventory record which will be placed in i

HOWARD P. FOLEY each file.

f COMPANY l'

4.3 A Document Review Analyst will indicate final acceptance of the conterits of' the' file ~ by signature and date in the appropriate space on the File Inventory form.

4.3.1 A Phase I review will be conducted first to verify inspection documentation supports the appropriate drawings and As-Builts.

i 4.3.2 A Phase II review will then be conducted

~

l to verify compliance to QAI-1 and/or individual checklists established for the purpose.

Phase i

m._.__.__.---

+- -II-s ha ll-be~ an-a dmi n i s tr a tive-revi ew.---- -

i 4.4 Deficiencies which are noted during the review

+

l and are not readily corrected shall be idencified l

by a Document Deficiency Notice (DDN) in accordance L

with QAI-1.

r:esolved DDN's will be included behind the File Inventory Record.

l l

l 4.,

-.m e

,-. w.,

my %

~,,,9.y.

,. ~.

,..,..... ~, _..,,,.. _., _...... - _....

y..

bl.n k u k's 1 THE Hoh'ARD Po FOLEY C.MPA',T t

4 QUALITY ASSUPE CE RECO?DS y

F I, c.

I.,.,. n..

. R,.,,

s.....

9 ei.

L'ork Initiation Document Package I.D.

i 9

DISCFIFTION S0. SHEETS P

J s

4 y

a n

l l

-. ~. - - - - - -.. - - -. - -. - - - - -

- - - -^--

G

  • S**?.

.C..'J..", ?

  • O,

.s

...L

.I **.i..;, g

?., 8.m. E

.I. na. )

T*

ge,=., e

  • 8.*, a w=

a p

9. 4.;,

9 1 m ' *.*

  • 2 s-g

- *4 g.*==. =.. 3 e. ;.

,*5 mL a. -

4=

.e.,m g

.n.

,e

.3

=

7

?

1.. f g*, e

.a=

g..

6--e

..-v

.+==b=g

.4

,y.,

u.

gux,.*,.

..~y.-.~-------

- + ' - ' '

"' " ' - * * ~ ' ' * ' ' ~ ' ' ' " ' ~"'

~ *

' ' ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ '~

THE-HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY.

I/JL/O' l

QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS V/;4 FILE INVENTORY

~

\\,/ A d

  • f. j o. u -

1 1.

Work Initiation Document

. Package I;.D.

DESCRIPTION

.NO. SHEETS:

i As-Built Drawing Work Process Traveler /EDR's, DR's DCN's HPF/WIS -' Weld Inspection Sheets j

.HPF/SSWIS - Sheet Steel Weld Inspection Sheets HPF/ABIR - Anchor Bolt Inspection Report

?

HPF/MSIR - MacW"1 Support Inspection Report j

HPF/DIR - Duct Inspection Report HFP/GIR -'Rev. 2 - GR N r Inspection Report i

1 1

m E

1*.V

%,m

'4 3

An 5p~ -['

f "f[ ht,,N ff ' $\\ [

'~

s

\\)

4..

'... O

_e_.,-

TOTAL SHEETS Phase I and Phase II review of this package is complete and acceptable.

Phase I Review Date Phase II - Review Date M % 9.W t*T' '* 1 %W IW *' A M"%f NkT WM-'45'P'""P WP*P'P r$'% S P ' '92*Tf f i+**''*%.^F # BS

  • TN MMP '-

WP h MN* g88*'e* B N *t **'*P*** *W8F*W *1p#eqUtsi"P " + 19 8*w p e. 9 - wo w y*

g-

-um ', noe s - g. d ag%ww-ge g es, yepie e

4 e es i

l THE HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

~

REVIEW C-6lSI Work Initiating Document Package I.D.

YES NO N/A

~

I.

PRELIMINARY REVIEW A.

Are documents listed on the index in the package?

B.

Has the index been signed for' Phase I review?

C.

Is the Work Initiating Document referenced or attached and complete?

D.

Is the latest Work Process Traveler attached and complace?

l E.

Are supplements attached to the Traveler and complete (where applicable)?

II.

INTERIM REVIEW A.

Is the as-built or drawing included and Phase I reviewed?

B.

Were the required inspections completed and documented?

l i$ k,,f',(Dr m p ;k

)

III.

FINAL

/.7 "

  • i, ;' p, ;*.e 1

.g

~7

'(.. ',{:. M..

p ;,.

'p rj q jf u

A.

Have discrepancies noted on Inspect on

'y

,i,'

Reports been resolved?

-L U

~~

I B.

Have discrepancies noted on this worksheet been resolved?

C.

Remarks:

Reviewed By Date

~;

C -,

b----.-..---.--------~.-----~--

m_....,.~._m.,-.~,

- - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - -

1 THE HOWARD P.

FO ZY CCMPANY g-

,, 4 QUA~aITY ASSURANCE RECORDS FILE INVENTORY i.

Wor.i~Inititation Document Fsckage I.3.

]

1 DESCRIPTION NO.EMIETS l

l As-Suilt Drawinz i

Werk Process Travaler/Cennect4-FL=--a M" 4 - m HPF/ MIS - Meld Inspection Sheet NCE Report colt F1 tup & Tigntening HFF/ EFT - Insrection Report i

HFT/TR - Torcue Report HPF/GIR - Rev.2 - Grout Insrection Reecrt i

Grout Arounc Thru Bolts MPF/T5G1R - Inscection Perort HPF/ESIR - Reinforcing Steel Insrection Rotort HPF/ESNR - Reinforcing Steel Neld Report PG & E Authorization to Drill

.e:/C31 -

or p(n en, c,.g g,

l/ABIP - Ancher Bolt Inspcction Rerer:

1 1

1..

f' ih g rA Ah n2

\\/

d l N f -' Q L / l M L If I

lw

......~ -.-~-.- - -. - - -- -.-

TOTAL SHEETS Ph:se I and Phase II review of this package is complete and acceptable.

Phar,e I-Review Dat Phase II -Review Dr.te r,emson.e te, - rw c-n ~~, en~.~. w-r--., n-,- +

-,r-.=.m

~r

~

e,*.

-~-v-r---

~~ ~ e

-*--w-e..

v,-~~~-~+.-

= ~. ~. ~.

l

y.: a.,,,,,

1 HE IGMFD P. FOIrl 024PANY temmca Immnum REVIEW i

a.

~')

i Work Initiating Document Package I.D.

~

YES NO N/A i

-I.

PRELIMINARY REVIEW-A.

Are documents listed on the index in the package?

B.

Has the index been signed for Phase I

)

review?

l C.

Is the Work Initiating Document referenced or attached and complete?

D.

-Is the latest Work Process Traveler I

attached and complace?

E.

Are supplements attached to the Traveler and complete (where applicable)?

l II.

INTERIM REVIEW

~

A.

Is the as-built or drawing included and

' Phase I reviewed?

J B.

Were the required inspections complaced and documented?

III. _ FINAL A.

Have discrepancies noted on Inspection Reports been resolved?

Havediscrepanciesnotedocheks I B.

f

'.. h l lfi

/

been resolved?

.j i

., g g Pj l

.' b % a w b

]

~

C.

Remarks:

(_

- -. -~--

- ' - ~ ' ~

P t

l.

i l

t Revisued By Date

,.__,.,_.m,._.,,-.

' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "

L

- - - - - - -