ML20215F125

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Transcript of 850808 Interview of J George in Dallas,Tx. Pp 1-14
ML20215F125
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 08/08/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
To:
Shared Package
ML20214X072 List:
References
NUDOCS 8610160090
Download: ML20215F125 (14)
v • d • e


Text

...

g

$.)

1

.ff 4-85-008 I

lu t

.}

1

,/

2 7

?.-

J 4

.t

?.A 5
  • 'J 6

':a

.'t.

7

.y

N 8

1.

9

~

I INTERVIEli OF 10 JOE GEORGE J

I

,?

11 AUGUST.8, 1985

'T 1:44 P.H.

12 j

DALLAS, TEXAS

.s

. ' '.do,IS. y, 13

  • ]

s;....

2 *.

14 4!

15 1b h:

17

(.l; 1o

. ?

19 L:

J

.1 20 l

1 t

L,i 21 I

22 8610160090 860922 PDR ADOCK 05000445 2 J.

A PDR

=

p 24 i

l

- ?

25

  • J

.i i

'i i

EIRIBIT 18

~

FEDERAL, COURT REPORTERS 7

. - ' ^

-\\

.x.,&a-SEk. -:J<N AAc~NI-N-AS" A*^.

.a.-. L

"'*"*"'****""""'*#^*

G.

^-

,.9 2

_. 2 8

i 1

A P P LA RAN C E S:

I

- m 2

U.

BkOOKS GRIFFIN i

  • ' /

Investigator l

3 United States Nuclear Regulat.ory Commission - Region IV l

  • 3 4

611 Ryan Plaza Dr.,

Suite 1000

. :1 as Arlington, Texas 76011 5

s APPEARING FOR'NRC p!

6 a

7 i

T!

a 8

WORSHAt1, FORSYTHE, SAMPLES

& WOOLDRIDGE 9

Suite 2500, 2001 Bryan Tower

'i Dallas, Texas 75201 10 n

MY: ROBERT A.'

WOOLDRIDGE k.*

11 i'

.A APPEARING FOR TUGCO y-12 D.

AND JOE GEORGE

.i i

i' 13

[h-

3.]

15 I

16 i

e 1 N DE X 17 l 'i 18 WITNESS: JOE GEORGE PAGI

(!

19 Lxamination by Mr. Griffin 3

p 2u e:

21 j4.

19 L.-

22

(

L;-

23 i.

24 l

25 g

u L.

I I

=_

m_

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

~ ~

b

c._ :.-

..:p. 2-.

,._.,;- g y.g.3 ;,y'1"_'",,.g'12%l., g, l,('7Q,,.,h.g.. _.....re,,ggg;cgrig;,;e r;hd

id -

j

~

Ti 5

1 i-iR. GRIFFIN:

For the r.e c o r d, this is 2

l an interview of Joe George, G-e-o-r-g-e, who is 3

employed by Texas Utilities Generating Company,

-g 4

vice-president of engineering and construction.

6

~'J t

., !j 5

The date is August the 8th, 1985, and the j

{

6

, time is.1:44 p.m.

Present at this interview are Joe

'.i

.f,

7

i. George and his personal representative, Robert n

d.(

8 I

Wooldridge.and myself, H.

Brooks Griffin,

,4

/,1 9

Investigator, NRC.'

This interview is being 10 transcribed by a Court Reporter.

i, s

11 i

Mr. George, I need you to rise and raise i

O.

12 your rigMt hand.

I'a going to swear you,to the i

Al-13 3

contents of your testimony.

(f. t; Wn'g v

i 14 Do you swear that the information you are 15 about to give is the truth, the wnole truth, and 3

i

(

16 noth2ng but the truth-so help you God?

i 17 THE WITNESS:

Yes, sir, I do.

<.. a 8

h ct 18 l

MR. GRIFFIN:

Thank you.

i

.. t m

19 EXAMINATION

,a td b/i 20 l

BY MR. GRIFFIN 4 l't I

a.

p, 21 I

Q.

Mr. George,.your title is-vice-pr esiden t of A

}

'9 22 engineering and construction for the Texas Utilities i

i i

's~;

23 l~ Generating C o'a p a n y, is that correct?

24 A.

Yes, that is c o r r.e c t.

And I'm the project I'

t.

~,

l e

'V

. n,';

25

[

general manager also at Comanche Peax for

w

,i 1

t

._r.

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS a

~~~

n..

m, ac.. m. _..

. _.. u a.

_-,..;:<_.1 cm,x m. m.gmsm._,...,..--,--.m-J s

.G

-Q 4

e

>g__

n l

t 1

e'ngineering and construction.

s' 2

Q.

And I understand you have been a Texas

)

T 3

Utilities' employee for approximate 1'y 26 years?

'j 4

A.

'Yes,'that is correct.

.?

y;t 5

Q.

And that you assumed your vice-president

.i 6

duties in August of 19807 F.o 7

A.

Tnat is correct.

':J

  • 3]

6 Q.

11r. George, did you have any input or were 9

you involved in the original contract with the'

  • l 10 11ana g emen t Analysis Company in 197d for tne third

. 2 11 party review of the implementation of the QA Program 3,

12 at Comanche Peak?

13 A.

No, I had no involvement in that.

[. {.

~

, g'i 14 Q.

W ers' you interviewed by any of the H.

f 15 Management Analysis representatives since it was b

i; 16 formed?

v.

k.

]:

17 A.

I do not recall being interviewed by any of t2 f

those folks, Brooks.

But that was seven years ago.

18 19 Q.

I understand.

1

$~

20 A.'

And during that period of time, there has I

?}

[

21 literally been thousands of people through that 4

f

}

22 pro 3ect and I have attenced hundreds of audits and 9

e 23 interviews and the 12xe, so --

i 24 Q.

I completely understand.

One of tne tnings I

25 tnat I'm going to be attempt.ing to do during the i

e t

g r

e i"~ ~~ "

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

~ ~

_, _..,...,.. _ - -. * ~-

w.

. x.. :.

._._..;...-..w,

_.- 2.

,._.-. = a :e,,:r......g.......v., m.g;..nm...x. xs.g.g m.33,g.

s.1

-s 4

I

.3.,

1 course of this interview is to jog your memory where

~

2 I can.

And I know that I'm asking you to reacn bacx

..:/

3 a long way in time.

But if you will, help me along 4

as much as you can.

8

,d 5

I would tell you that based upon the MAC jj 6

i. report itself, they make a list of names that they o

,),

7 interviewed or contacted.

And your name is in that

'i.

l

f) 8 report.

.They have you listed, assuming they did it

,d 9

accurately, as having been interviewed by one of tne 10 MAC representatives, having attended the pre-audit t

11 meeting and the post-audit meeting.

But you say you 3

,.).

12 do not have any recollection,of attendance at any of g

{

11 13 i

those?

i 14 A.

I recall no details of that, those meetings.

2:1 m.)

15 u.

Okay.

The two people, or -

.There were H

9 16 I

three men from MAC that performed this review.

They i

j 17 l

were John Jackson, Jack Norris, and a guy named N

I p

16 Hendron.

Do you know any of these gentlemen?

)-

g 19

~~'A.

No, sir, I don't.

I don't, recall ever i

j 20 Know2ng tnose guys.

s

.I l

j 21 j

Q.

One thing that I learned as I went through I

l.j 22 i' or started this investigation is tnat tne iiAC 1.-

t 23 representatives periodically came on site, I guers, i

24 to solicit business over the years.

And you never t

I

..x j

'.'j 25 nad occasion to meet any of them during tnat tine?

i O

--.-.e.

.m--.

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

~

__z.

. _. i.

y$ _ '.

.. _.. _:...:,.'_. w -c.

> = ~.- & < ~ " - ~ + < * -w~ J^%===a J 'a M=="~""^ '

y d4 G

'M

_ _ _ _-..z 3

t i.

1 A.

' N'o.

As I s a i d _e all i e r.,

I have met nundreds.

,i 2

'D.

I understand.

/

3 A.

And --

t.

h 4

Q.

I'm anxing you what you specifically m

h 5

remember.

Do you have any personal xnowledge of 76

'5 6

I whether MAC had performed reviews of QA Programs for 14 E.

7 any of the others, for like Brown & Root or any 8

M W

i other subcontractors?

15 b[

9 A.

I'm aware that MAC in South Texas and

~

10 11ou s t on was involved.

f..

11 Q.

How about for Comanche Peax7 g

12 A.

I was not aware that they were doing -- I M

h 13 have no knowledge of anything they have ever done in~.

d' 14 that line.

S j

15 Q.

Jea, do you recall the Utility's efforts to m

t 16 respond to the Invervenor's request in 1980 to l.

}

17 produce documents in the area of the QA Program?

4 18 A.

I would be aware that the Intervenor

~

19 requested a lot of information.

I have been at the h

20 site all along.

And that would be handled out of 9

21 Licensing D & D in Dallas, so I wouldn't know the i

22 exact details of it.

t

]

23 0

Oxay.

Let me tell you what my 24 understanding is.

When Licensing received or was 25 made aware of tne Intervenor's request, their a

t g

1 4

7-

-rmuraAt CoUne azPoarras

, a u:.

~.... - m..

..,._.=n.

a...;. w... --. w.-;.1,..,, +;, x..,.,,,,., a.n,g,g g y

7___ _

. ~.. - -.

'.tl t

1 procedure was to contact tne various groups within b

2 ene Utilities that would be able Jo conduct the 3

reviews and assemble the appropr2 ate documents for s

4 tne response.

.R

.g 5

'And I'm telling you this.

It is my

.a i

6 j

understanding that you and your subordinates were t

.(3 7

! one of the groups that received n'otification of this y

i S

8 request a'hd were asked to review whatever files that l

9 might contain documents that would be producible 10 under this request.

Do you have any recollection of i

l' 11 the your part or your group's part in responding?

Vi i

12 MR. WOOLDRIDGE:

Brooks, let's clarify

-g 13 what you mean by "this request".

Are you talking

.'l/.b.fj

'c-l4 about. a specific request or all of the requests?

~

6

'j 15 That is what I want to Know.

'r

  • .s 16 MR. GRIFFIN:

Oxay.

i.i 17 Q.

(BY t1R. GRIFFIN)

What I'm referring to by n

18 the request is the Intervenor case in 1980 made, I I

]

19 l

guess, a ratner lengtny request for It was kind 1

I 20 l

of e

a discovery type motion, I think.

In 7

i-21 i

Hr. Wooldridge's one of his letters to the NRC,

~.

l

's 22 he toon the time to list all of the -- And I will ti 23

'I give you the exact title.

It was actually referred 24 to Item 10, which I think covered implementation of i

i

,r O

25 ene QA Program.

Item 10 of cases, interrogatories, i

'.~/

g 1

i

'j _ _ __

_ _ [' _.

i s

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

~

l?

I

x.

h

...........=.n.e-.m,...-.-

=

~ ^ ^ ~.

,.__.._,_n..,..

... gn

,a n s. ; ?n-y!

6 A

g i

.s I

and request to produce dated July the 7th, 1980 as 2

clarified on Aug-ust the 4th, 1980.

..)

3 As I was saying earlier. it is my 2:

.,1 4

understanding that when this request was received,

.y,j 5

various divisions or groups within the Utilities p:,

t 3

6 were asked to review their files.

And it is my d

Q.

7 understanding also that your group was one of those

'l 8

to receive a request to review.

Do you have any 1

9 recollection of that?

10

)'

A.

I don't recall it.

But if we were asked, I I

11 would certainly be sure we did.

But I don't 12 recollect.' The Dallas licensing group would g

13 normally do that.

'.WE.-

4

~:

b 14 Q.

Well, I think'they were the group that 15 actually received all'of the collective documents.

I g

16 But I eninx in this instance I'm telling you this.

i 17 I

Now, Mr. Marshall was more or 1ess i

16 4

His name is John Marshall?

g

.i 19 MR. WOOLDRIDGE:

Yes.

}

20 U.

(BY MR. GRIFFIN)

John Harsnall was 21 responsible for some o'f the duties to fulfill this 22 request, the Applicant's response to the Intervenor.

1 23 And that he i.ould nave sent you notification of what 2*

needeu to be reviewec.

But you say you don't nave j

25 any recollection?

t j

4

..m 66

~

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

-'~

_:..>=.:--..

~

..r

~=

~

w,

_.. m.

_.,. m-, s, w

t.mu,w. 3...

3-

.,,, 7.r _.. t p.w.

t.-

.9

._.9 Ej..

.i c 1

t 1

A.

Well, again, I'm generally aware that tne 2

Intervenor asked for large amounts or material.

-3 Q.

I understand.

.) -

(*

4 A.

But as far as recalling the 9.k

.l

j 5

C.

Do you ever recall naving any discussions N..

i 3

6 i

with Mr. Marshall regarding this particular request?

.j 7

A.

No, I don't.

~.

jf, 8

l Q.

,Okay.

Do you recall having any personal i

9 j

discussions with

'.j Ron Tq1so6 regarding fulfilling 10 this request or collecting the documents for this 2,.

11 request?

.h l

g.

12 o

MR. WOOLDRIDGE:

Again, globally or a

4 13 about the particular request for QA?

V 14 HR. GRIFFId About this particular 15 request.

Yes, this particular request.

j lb A.

Well, I don't know sir.

I don't recall 71 d

17 i

tnat particular request, for that matter.

i

~

  • i l es j

Q.

(BY HR. GRIFFIN )

Believe me, like I said 19 L varlier, I know that some of tnese things you are O

f 20 not going to Know about, but I nave got to asx the j.

21 i

questions because I have to make come tull circle a,

f 22' here.

~

23 Do you have any recollection As I said 1

24 earlier, you are listed in tne f1AC report as j

t 25 attencing the post-audit meeting.

If I understand 7

A i

M~

~

FEDERAL COURT RE' PORTERS

o

c. _

___.1._.

..i_-

r E er y,.

.y im r

g a

r

  • - 3 hens Ainh*= M b M' M W
  • g 10

,g i

I

'.E.

1 I

I i

I 1

you correctly, you have no recollections of that?

3.,

2 A.

In general, I don't recall the post-audit 3

l-3 with the exception of an outside storage of

'.!J.

4 stainless.

I think that that may nave required some

  • 1 5

responte, and I think that at one of the meetings

,.'J Lt g

6 following MAC may have involved that.

,j, 7

Q.

But that was not*with the MAC

..s 8

j representatives themselves?

9 A.

I don't recall who was at the meeting.

10 Q.

Oxay.

Joe, did you have anything to'do 11 with formulating the agency's response to the MAC 31 12 a-report itself?

~. ' '

13 MR. WOOLDRIDGE:

The agency's report?

(1 I

".p j

14 l

Q.

(BY HR. GRIFFIN)

Well, agency, Utilities'.

o 15 A.

Again, I was aware that the MAC people were i

16 j

there in '78 on the QA.

It was my perception that a

\\-

17 response was not requi, red.

I didn't really know

.t Q

18 enat a submittal was made.

19 Q.

Oxay.

Well, I will tell you this then.

4 a

p 20 There was a response made within the Utilities w

Se

,J 21

~

answering the specific qu'estions or maxing i

giving I

22 responses to particular areas that MAC had found 23 tnat they were critical about.

24 And I'm'asxing you:

Did you attend any 25 meetings, have any discussions, or have any input inte a

qt

{

C.L y

F

...... c c..-. _

a __

..gy ;..epg e.e r.

~..n 3-9:"M *= _\\'

  • A'M -* r'
  • .'*O *' n' % ' * ' '** *MO *M'~5 Y '5 $Y'

?' b t'e

..{5}I 11

- 4 p

t n

i

.. i t

'S 1

this internal response answering the MAC questions?

2 A.

I don't recall any input into it.

v.

3 O.

Oxay.

At the time that the TUGCO made its 4

response to the Intervenor on this subject, did you

?

'j 5

attend any meetings or have any discussions with

'M i

q.

6

. l Chapman or Tolson or anybody else 'in which they L;:i 7

conveyed to you or told you that there was a report ei U,

I q

8 i

produced by MAC that they felt was producible -under

~

9 9

) this Intervenor's. request in 19807 5

10 A.

I don't recall any discussions, none.

11 Q.

Did you ever have any conversations with 3

[!-

12 Mr..Fixar about his de' cision to withhold the MAC

  • s l

, ' ^

13 report or his belief that the MAC report.was g.-.,

J's proprietary or witnin tne comp,any?

14

'l 15 i

A.

No, sir, I don't recall any such 6,

j 16 l

discussions.

9' 17.

Q.

Do,you know of any other reviews, third

.1 I

j..

18 l

party reviews of the OA Program at Comanche Peak a

j, 19.

l that have been withheld or have been determined to D

j 20 be proprietary?

r!

j 21 A.

QAr I have had no reporting responsibility

['T

.j 22 in the QA area.

And to my knowledge, everything has N

23 been produced that is tnere.

24 Q.

All rignt.

Joe, I want to ask you a final i

25 question.

Do you nave any other information in any e

s.

g j

g

[. _ r --' : -- - " r -

~

p1_

FEDEkAL COURT REPORTERS

~

.A.

- _ e......Mwrcsxpu_.-_,+l,6,:.esA wrmdw.ris.dw4caa.s.gy,d- /.w gggg ggg g.

)..

12

@n i

o

+

I area related to the MAC r ep o r t_. t h a t I have not asxed 2

you about?

Anything tnat sheds any light on the

./

.1

,1 3

origin of the MAC report; why it was withheld, how 2

4 it was found in 1985, and/or.the decision to produce hy 5

it in 19857

~

5 h

6 A.

I can't think of a thing.

e 7

Q.

So when they located here during the 8

l prudency audit, you were not consulted regarding the r

c.

9 origins Df the MAC report or whether it snould be 1

l' 10 produced?

(/,

11' l

A.

I had no involvement on that.

I was f'

!}

12 Mr. wooldridge asxed me what I knew about it.

hg 13 Q..

Okay.

The inzormation you transmitted to n

  • ";. ~

!j 14 Mr. Wooldridge as part of h.is own investigat, ion into c

15 tne history of the MAC report, was it essentially i

p 16 l

the same area that we have covered and were your h

f, 17 responses the same?

.i h:

g lu A.

It is pretty well down tnose lines; yes, 7

't lw air.

2U Q.

OK'ay.

Joe, have I threatened you in any f

El manner?

a 22 A.

I haven't perceived it if you have.

~

b 23 Q.

Have 1 offered you any rewards in return t-24 tor this statement?

h-

.\\

25 A.

No, sir.

't kY p.

FEDERAL COURT _ REPORTERS

~ ' ~

.-.,_-r-f 5 E,2 v'E'

  • O P 7A s -

L J Of.* N LI*.'

DF" 7

O'A'D'M O 'Oh'*2*' 209 -

edht* ' * --

1j 5

n

..s 1

la il 1

,. i, e

t i

1 Q.

Have you given tnis statement freely and 2

voluntarily?

i :

l 3

A.

Yes, sir.

i

. f.}

4 Q.

Is there anything that you would care to

.a

..}

. ;.)

5 add to the rdcord?

i j;

6 A.

Nothing that I can thinx of right now.

. >e

.i.

7 Q.

i l'

. All rignt.

I appreciate your time here 7Q 8

today.

,3 9

i (Interview concluded at 2:05 p.m.

i)'

10 11 o

12

.-.t e4 T;

13

1 (d. ~, h> t

..J r.

ft

<d 14 t.

(" S I

15 l'

l l'

16 i

.n i

17

{

lu

'i 19

!i g

t.-

20 9

1' 21

(.

I

+

22-

?

I g

2 e

  • )

24

+

, T9

  • l':

25

..\\'O

,j-t

_.5

' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ _

FEDERAL COURT REPORTERS

~

...n.-

~..

- ^

. -x.w.u z ~k~ qdwr i?"d** Sud"=

  • EfMU%'"M'A'O%

m,

=N O

e n, 2,

t i

I*

8

~

l CERTIFICATE OF OFFICIAL REPORTER 2

i.

3 This is to certify that the

i attached. proceedings 4

i before the UNITED STATES NULCEAR REGULATORY

-)

j 5

COMMISSION in the matter of:

e.)

un 6

r.1

.7 l

NAME OF PROCEEDING:

OFFICE OF INVESTIGATION ev t

i 8.

L INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW 9

2 (CLOSED) 10 e

11 1

s g.

12 l

~1

.s m

41 13;

[

PLACE:

DALLAS,. TEXAS w:

J 14' y

.s 15 DATE:

  1. AUGU5iT 8, lisb 5 3

16 i

17 r,

ll.

16 were held as herain appears, and that this is the p,

I T

19 original transcript thereof for the file of the I

p.

I

\\;

20 United States Huclear Regulatory Commission.

A j

21 22 rm e, s

JAMESi M.

SHAW, CSR, RPR 23 Offidial Reporter Federal Court Reporters e' 4 i

1226' Commerce Street Suite 411

..')

25 Dallas, Texas 75202 d

i

,t g.

t p

3

~ _.....

FEDl:RAL COURT ' REPORTERS l

~~~

,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20215F125&oldid=3977782"