Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML20135D986, ML20207R745, ML20210D696, ML20210T949, ML20210T980, ML20210U020, ML20210U168, ML20211G851, ML20214W928, ML20214W946, ML20215C373, ML20215C402, ML20215C422
|
MONTHYEARML20210U1681984-04-0404 April 1984
Changes 0 to 0 of PT/0/A/4150/11A, Control Rod Worth Measurement:Rod Swap
Project stage: Other
ML20210T9801984-04-26026 April 1984
Changes 0 to 3 of PT/0/A/4150/11, Control Rod Worth Measurement
Project stage: Other
ML20215C4021985-08-28028 August 1985
Forwards DPC-NE-1003, Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20215C4221985-08-31031 August 1985
Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20135D9861985-09-10010 September 1985
Forwards Summary of Review Criteria Evaluations,Per WCAP-9863-A, Rod Bank Worth Measurement Utilizing Bank Exchange & Ser.On 850626,measured 12.5% Below Predicted Value.No Safety Analysis Input Assumptions Effected
Project stage: Other
ML20206T8691986-07-0303 July 1986
Forwards Action Plan for Performance Improvement. Plan Addresses 851226 Event & Includes Prioritization Process Which Identifies Actions That Will Be Completed Before Restart.Review Requested
Project stage: Other
ML20210D6961986-09-15015 September 1986
Informs of Results of Cycle 3 Startup Physics Tests Conducted Using Method Described in, Rod Bank Worth Measurement Utilizing Bank Exchange. Ref Bank,Shutdown C, Worth Measured 14% Below Predicted Value
Project stage: Other
ML20215C3731986-10-0101 October 1986
Forwards Forwarding Rept Re Rod Swap Methodology, Which Was Never Docketed.Info Not Revised in Any Way, Submitted for Docketing Purposes Only
Project stage: Other
ML20197C6821986-10-30030 October 1986
Forwards Response to 860530 Request for Addl Info Necessary for Preparation of SER Supporting Plant Restart. Instrumentation & Control Sys & non-nuclear Instrumentation Schematic Drawings Will Be Sent Separately
Project stage: Request
ML20213F7001986-11-0606 November 1986
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Sys Review & Test Program. Questions Include Sys & Components Controlled in Tech Specs, Including Containment Isolation Valves,Core Flood Tanks & Pressure Boundary Isolation Valves
Project stage: RAI
ML20207A9541986-11-0606 November 1986
Notification of 861119 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md to Brief NRC Mgt on Status of Facility Performance Improvement Program.Agenda Encl
Project stage: Request
ML20214D1621986-11-17017 November 1986
Advises That Response to 861106 Request for Addl Info Re Sys Review & Test Program Will Be Submitted by 861205
Project stage: Request
ML20214W9281986-12-0404 December 1986
Forwards Rev 1 to DPC-NE-1003, Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20214V4931986-12-0505 December 1986
Forwards Response to J Stolz 861106 Request for Addl Info Re List of Selected Sys Which Are Part of Sys Review & Test Program
Project stage: Request
ML20214W9461986-12-31031 December 1986
Rev 1 to DPC-NE-1003, Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20207N2931987-01-12012 January 1987
Forwards Request for Addl Info to Complete Review of DPC-NE-1103, Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing. Info Required within 30 Days to Meet Review Completion Prior to Approval of Plant Reloads
Project stage: RAI
ML20213A5551987-01-28028 January 1987
Requests Remittance of Application Fee for Review of Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Approval
ML20210T9491987-01-29029 January 1987
Changes 0 to 31 of PT/0/A/4150/21, Post-Refueling Controlling Procedure for Criticality,Zero Power Physics & Power Escalation Testing
Project stage: Other
ML20210U0201987-01-29029 January 1987
Changes 0 to 5 of PT/0/A/4150/11A, Control Rod Worth Measurement:Rod Swap
Project stage: Other
ML20210T8691987-02-11011 February 1987
Forwards Response to NRC 870112 Request for Addl Info Re Determination of Rod Worth Using Rod Swap Methodology. Methodology Described in 861204 Submittal Will Be Used for 870501 Reloads of Plants
Project stage: Request
ML20211G8511987-02-16016 February 1987
Comments on D Hood Re 14.5% Discrepancy Between Predicted & Measured Worths of Ref Bank of Unit 2,Cycle 3. Caused by Shortcomings in Measurement Technique.Procedure Used to Measure Rod Worths Will Be Revised
Project stage: Other
ML20207R7451987-03-11011 March 1987
Forwards Revised Responses to Questions 6 & 7 Re Determination of Rod Worth Using Rod Swap Methodology,Per Ds Hood 870112 Request & 870219 & 0310 Telcons Between Ds Hood & SA Gewehr
Project stage: Other
ML20205J0971987-03-11011 March 1987
Safety Evaluation Re Sys Selected for Facility Sys Review & Test Program.Sys Constitutes Adequate Scope for Sys Review & Test Program
Project stage: Approval
ML20205J0851987-03-11011 March 1987
Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Sys Selected for Facility Sys Review & Test Program.List of Selected Sys Acceptable.Salp Input Also Encl
Project stage: Approval
ML20214M3101987-05-22022 May 1987
Forwards SER Based on Review of Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing & 870211 & 0311 Supplemental Info.Rod Swap Methodology Acceptable for Rod Worth Measurement of Reload Cores for Plants
Project stage: Approval
ML20214M3361987-05-22022 May 1987
Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Rept Entitled, Rod Swap Methodology Rept for Startup Physics Testing
Project stage: Approval
1986-12-04
[Table View] |
Text
_
a 1
Docket Nos.: 50-369, 50-370 50-413, 50-414 i
i Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President j
Nuclear Production Department MAY 2 2 W -
i Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Tucker:
Subject:
R0D SWAP METHODOLOGY REPORT FOR STARTUP PHYSICS TESTING, l
MCGUIRE AND CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 1
-(TACs62981,62982,62983,62984) i 1
By letter ' dated December 4,1986, you submitted a report titled " Rod Swap Methodology Report for Startup Physics Testing," and you submitted additional infonnation by letters dated February 11 and March 11, 1987.
In addition, j
telephone discussions were held on May 1,1987 with members of your company regarding conditions associated with our approval.
j We have reviewed the material submitted and find the rod swap methodology as described to be acceptable for rod worth measurement of reloaded cores for
{
McGuire and Catawba Stations, Units 1 and 2. This approval recognizes your
{
prior agreement to certain conditions listed in our enclosed Safety Evaluation l
Report.
I Should you have any questions regarding the enclosure, contact me at (301)492-8961 or K. Jabbour at (301) 492-7367.
In any future correspondence 4
regarding this approval, please include a reference to TACs 62981, 62982, 62983
)
and 62984.
i j
Sincerely, j
Darl Hood, Project Manager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation Report 1
I cc w/enci j
See next page 60g g g
}
LISTAHETML-
}
GoCket Pus >
OGC-Bethesda Local PDR ACRS(10)
NRC PDR EJordan l
PDII-3 Reading JPartlow i
BJYoungblood Reading MDuncan t
KJabbour OGC-Bethesda I
DHood PDIIh (PI/II k w fr1 psn j
PDII-3/DRPI/II 3/DRPI/II PDIIj)/J RPI/II PD DR 1
DHood/ rad KJabbour MDdnd&n L BJ h ngblood-i 05/2l/87 05/tt/87-05/gl/87 05/"fi7 f
l
-