ML20211M718

State of Me Ingestion Pathway Plan for Seabrook Station, Seabrook,Nh

ML20211M718
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/13/1987
From:	MAINE, STATE OF
To:
Shared Package
ML20211M702	List: ML20211M696 ML20211M718
References
PROC-870213, NUDOCS 8702270347
Download: ML20211M718 (169)

Text

es .

I State of Maine Ingestion  ;

Pathway Plan a

for Seabrook Station Seabrook, New Hampshire

O l

p== = 889;p l

g George S. Thomas vica President-Nuclear Production

('T February 13, 1987

( )

M Service of New Hampshire NYN-87019 New Hampshire Yankee Division United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk Ref e rences : (a) Facility Operating License NPF-56, Construction Permit CPPR-136, Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444 (b) Letter by State of Maine Bureau of Civil Emergency Preparedness, dated February 12, 1987, R. D.

Dutremble to G. S. Thomas (c) Letter by State of Maine Bureau of Civil Emergency Preparedness, dated February 12, 1987, R. D.

Dutremble to H. Vickers Subj ect : Radiological Emergency Response Plans; State of Maine Ingestion Path Plan for Seabrook Station Gentlemen:

fm Pursuant tc 10CFR50.33(g) and n.4 thereto, enclosed please find (V) nine (9) copies of the ingestion pathway plan associated with Seabrook Station for the State of Maine. This plan has also been submitted to FEMA, Region I, under separate cover. Further details regarding this submission are provided in the enclosed State of Maine correspondence l

[ References (b) and (c)].

Also, one copy of this information is being transmitted by prepaid delivery service / mail to the interested parties (i.e., to the ASLB Service List) as well as the ASLB Panel.

Very truly yours,

-dd George,S. Thomas Enclosures l

i l

l OA l

U l

l l P.O. Box 300 . Seabrook, NH 03874 . Telephone (603) 474-9574 l

f United States Nuclear Rigulatory Ccamission NYN-87019 Attention: Document Control Desk Page 2

,3 V cc: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Service List (Of f site EP)

Mr. Vincent S. Noonan, Director (w/o enclosure)

PWR Project Directorate No. 5 Division of PWR Licensing-A United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Dr. Thomas E. Murley (w/o enclosure)

Regional Administrator United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 i

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Rockingham, ss. February 13, 1987 s Then personally appeared before me, the above-named George S. Thomas who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Vice President-Nuclear Production of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, that he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing information in the name and on the behalf of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and that the statements therein are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

0 >>_

l; N. A -

Doris'J. Pat 1(pson, Notary Public My Commissio'r Expires: October 29, 1991 0

i

..e..,

"~

e: y4 BUREAU OF CIVIL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STATE HOUSE STATION 72

• AUGUSTA L'AINE 04333

• G) 26? ri.

[W, _. %*

_. OEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND VETERANS SERVICES -

February 12, 1987 Mr. Henry Vickers, Regional Director Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 1 J. W. McCormack Post Office and Courthouse Boston, MA 02109

Dear Mr. Vickers:

I as transmitting herewith.the State of Maine Ingestion Pathway Plan for Seabrook Station for FEMA review and comments. The Maine Ingestion Pathway Plan for Seabrook Station has been prepared in conformance with regulatory requirements of 10CFR50, the planning standards of NUREG-0654, FEMA REP 1.

Rev. 1, and the planning guidance of FEMA Guidance Memorandua IN-1.

Sufficient copies of the plan are being provided to you for distribution O to those members of~the Regional Assistance Committee that you may deem appro-priate. Attachments 2 and 4 of the plan, LAND USE DATA and FARMER NOTIFICATION PERSONNEL respectively, are not included in the copies of the plan being trans-mitted to you as these attachments are confidential in nature. Attachments 2 and 4 will be available for your inspection at our offices.

l l

If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Robert Malaney of this office.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely, h_5,, J $ 01. , h u a% '

' Richard D. Dutremble Director RDD:bk Attachments L/RDD O

EMERGENCY SELF HELP AT THE LOCAL LEVEL

,. - e v 4 3"y BUREAU OF CIVIL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STATE HOUSE STAT!ON 72

• AUGUSTA MA NE 04333 * (227 251G f ', t .9 ',

, i u-

- - - - - DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND VETERANS SERVICES ---

February 12, 1987 Mr. George S. Thomas Vice President, Nuclear Production Public Service of New Hampshire New Hampshire Yankee Division P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874

Dear Mr. Thomas:

I have transmitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1.

on this date, the State of Maine Ingestion Pathway Plan for Seabrook Station.

I understand that printed, tabbed and bound copies of the plan have been prepared for distribution to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board service list. I would ask that you serve the required number of copies of the plan on the Licensing Board and on the parties to the licensing proceedings in accordance with your procedures.

As I have noted to FEMA, Region 1. Attachments 2 and 4 of the plan, LAND USE DATA and FARMER NOTIFICATION PERSONNEL respectively, have not been included in the copies of the plan for distribution; these attachments are confidential in nature. Attachments 2 and 4 have been made available to FEMA, Region 1, for

' its inspection.

If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Robert Malaney of this office.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, r_e - , ,; ce /. --

?,

Richard D. Dutremble

! Director I

( RDD:bk l

l I

L/RDD.1

O I EMERGENCY SELF HELP AT THE LOCAL LEVEL

q 3

% (v) . J ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA COMMENTS Miscellaneous

a. Statement of intent (J.11.): Section 1, Purpose

b. Concept of operations (A.1.a.b.c.d.); Section 3, Concept of Operations

c. Site-specific information; such as maps that show agricultural Attachment 2, Land Use Data land use data (J.11.), central points and key organization (s) for receipt and analysis of all field monitoring data (H.12.),

and relevant contacts within the 50-mile EPZ;

d. Monitoring and sampling methods (J.11.); Attachment 1 Field Operations Guide

e. Available Federal Resources: The Federal response assistance for Section 8, Emergency Response Support actual radiological emergencies is identified in the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) which was published 3 by FEMA in the Federal Register on September 28, 1986. The FRERP was published to provide the basis for implementing the

! response of specific Federal agencies and provision of coordinated Federal assistance to State and local governments for all types of radiological, emergencies. The Federal Radiological Monitoring j and Assessment Plan (FRMAP) was developed to coordinate Federal radiological assistance. Although the FRMAP is part of the FRERP, it may be implemented separately. The FRMAP deals with the initiation and coordination of Federal radiological monitoring i and assessment (C.1.a.b.c.); and

f. A policy whether to allow farmers to enter contaminated areas for Not Applicable - Evacuation of farmers is not limited time periods for the purpose of tending livestock. This planned in any part of the IPZ within the is an option that must be decided by the State, taking into State of Maine.

account the various legal aspects of this status, and the public health and safety considerations of this type of action (K.3.4.5.).

1 2

1 of 5

=

]

] ~w./ ,

ACCEPTANCE _CR_ITERI.A QOMMENTS G.1 Public information efforts directed at farmers and food processors Section 5, Public Information within the plume exposure pathway EPZ should provide for the dissem-ination of instruction at least annually covering the following subjects:

1. Effects of radiation and radioactive material deposits on the human food supply:

2. Explanation of the FDA's preventive and emergency action levels:

l 3. Identification of preventive protective actions to be taken for I protecting water, livestock, crops, fruits and vegetables.

Examples of preventive protective actions are:

a. Milk Pathway ~

Remove all producing dairy animals from pasture ano place them on uncontaminated feed and water,

b. Food Pathway Ripe or growing fruits and vegetables may be saved by washing, brushing or peeling to remove surface contamination.

c. Water Pathway Open wells, rainbarrels and tanks should be covered to prevent contamination of water supplies. For storage containers which are supplied by runoff tiom roofs or other surface drain fields, the filler pipe should be disconnected to prevent contaminants from being washed into the storage container. Contaminants deposited on the ground will normally travel very slowly into the aquifier, so contamination of ground water supplies should not be an immediate problem following a release.

4. Methods and sources of notifying farmers, food processors and distributors of protective actions in time of emergency; and

5. Where to seek further information, such as NOAA Weather Radio, EBS, or others.

2 of 5

O O O ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA COMMENTS l G.1 (continued) l Public information efforts directed at farmers and food processors Section 3, Concept of Operations in the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ and outside the plume exposure 3.2.3, Role Description for State pathway EPZ should be provided for in case of emergency circumstances. .

Agencies State departments of agriculture in conjunction with county agri- Section 5, Public Information culture extension agents should be prepared to deliver written 5.1.2, Brochures esterials within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of the beginning of an emergency to the tgricultural population in the ingestion EPZ. This would entail htving 1) wri*. ten instructions on protective measures prepared for instant printing and a distribution capability arranged, and 2) scripts of instructions ready for broadcast via radio and television and on immediate and continuous basis if needed. Copies of printed instructions should be available on request.

J.9 An emergency plan will typically be acceptable under this evaluation Section 4, Protective Response criterion if it describes a system that meets the following criteria: 4.1, Milk Control 4.2, Water Control Specifies persons by title authorized to recommend or order 4.3, Food Control 1.

preventive and/or emergency protective actions and to issue 4.4, Decision Process for Selection of embargo notices for contaminated food stuffs. Protective Actions Describes criteria on which this decision shall be based, such as Section 4, Protective Response 2.

radiological readings, laboratory analysis, and integrated dose 4.5.2, Emergency Protective Actions projection, and recommendations provided by Federal Interagency guidance in WINCO 1009 and 1012.

J.11 To be acceptable in the ingestion exposure pathway emergency plan should describe an effective system for identifying contamination of the food supply if any has occurred, and for preventing such contam-inated foods from being marketed. Additionally, the emergency plan should describe an effective system for informing consumers concern-ing known or potentially contaminated products and precautions which c y be taken to reduce or avoid levels of contamination ingestion.

The review under this criterion will ensure that the plan:

3 of 5

sm 9 p

! ( I G %J ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA COMMENTS J.11 (continued)

1. Maintains current addresses and phone numbers (in an SOP) of Attachment 3, Disaster Liaison Team relevant contacts such as Departments of Health and Agriculture, Representatives Emergency Operations, and radiation laboratories, both within the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ and in adjoining jurisdictions that may be impacted;

2. Contains or has available maps and appropriate files cross- Attachment 2, Land Use Data indexed to maps that show agricultural land use data, e.g., farms, Section 4, Protective Response dairies, pastures, fruit and vegetable growers, slaughterhouses, 4.3, Food Control processing plans, water supply intakes, reservoirs and water treatment plant:

3. Identifies and described procedures for detecting contamination Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide for estimating the dose commitment consequences of uncontrolled Section 4, Protective Response ingestion; and

4. Identifies and described protection procedures, including both Section 4, Protective Response preventive and emergency protective actions, to cope with the effects of radiological contamination of the food chain.

, N.1.a, N.1.b 1

i To aid State governments in developing exercise scenarios for testing These criteria can only be tested in actual exposure pathway planning measures, eight exercise objectives are drills and exercises. Appropriate sections provided below. These objectives are taken from the list of 35 exer- which will be involved are listed below:

cise objectives contained in Attachment 2 of the August 5, 1983 memorandum titled " Procedural Policy on Radiological Emergency Pre-

paredness Plan Reviews, Exercise Observations and Evaluations, and Interim Findings". As provided, they should help States to develop i excrcises, in cooperation with licensees, that are tailored to key capabilities needed for effectively managing ingestion-related prob-less posed by a radiological emergency. The number of each objective

corresponds to the listing in the August 5, 1983 memorandum.

l 1. Demonstrate ability to make decisions and to coordinate emergency Section 4, Protective Response j activities within the ingestion exposure pathway emergency plan-ning zone. (3) i i 4 of 5 l

i ACCEPTANCE _ CRITERIA CDMMENTS N.1.a. N.1.b (continued) i

2. Demonstrate ability to communicate with all appropriate locations, Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide organizations, and field personnel; with special emphasis on communications between field monitoring and sampling teams and j their control points. (5)

3. Demonstrate ability to mobilize and deploy sample collection teams Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide in a timely fashion. (6)

4. Demonstrate appropriate equipment and procedures for laboratory Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide I measurement and analysis of cesium, strontium, and radio-iodine j deposits in food and environmental samples. (8)

I l 5. Demonstrate appropriate equipment and procedures for collection Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide l and transport of samples of soil, vegetation, snow, water, and

milk. (9)

6. Demonstrate ability to project dosage to the public via ingestion Attachment 1, Field Operations Guide pathway exposure, based on utility and field data, and to deter- Section 4, Protective Response mine appropriate protective measures, based on protective action  ;

guides (PAGs) and other relevant factors. (11)

7. Demonstrate ability to implement preventive and emergency pro- Section 4, Protective Response a tective actions for ingestion exposure pathway hazards. (12)

8. Demonstrate ability to formulate and distribute appropriate Section 5, Public Information instructions to the public, in a timely fashion. (14) i f

l 1

s 5 of 5 i

TA8LE OF CONTENTS rr (y

Section Title Pa9' 1.0 PURPOSE 1-1 2.0 BASIS 2-1 2.1 ENERGENCY PLANNING ZONES 2-1 2.2 PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES 2-1 3.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS 3-1'

3.1 DESCRIPTION

3-1 l ,

3.2 AGENCY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3-3 i

l 3.2.1 Common Responsibilities 3-3 3.2.2 Agency Roles 3-4 s 3.2.3 Role Description for State Agencies 3-5 l

t 4.0 PROTECTIVE RESPONSE 4-1 4.1 NILK CONTROL 4-2 4.2 WATER CONTROL 4-2 4.3 F000 CONTROL 4-3 i

4.4 DECISION PROCESS FOR SELECTION OF PROTECTIVE

( ACTIONS FOR INGESTION PATHWAY EXPOSURES 4-4 4.5 PROTECTIVE ACTIONS 4-6 4 4.5.1 Preventive Protective Actions 4-7 4.5.2 Emergency Protective Actions 4-8 4.6 RECOVERY 4-9 4.6.1 Recovery from Food and Water Control 4-10

-i-

..y- _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

O, Section Title Page 1 /

5.0 ,

PUBLIC INFORNATION 5-1 5.1 PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICIES 5-1 5.1.1 Rumor Control 5-2

> 5/1.2 Brochures 5-2 i:  ;

5.1.3 Radio /TV 5-2 i

6.0 FACILITIES 6-1

! 6.1 STATE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 6-1 6.2 YORK COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 6-1 1

6.3 INCIDENT FIELD OFFICE / EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY 6-1 <

6.4 MEDIA CENTER 6-2 6.5 PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY 6-2 O 7 . 0' e

AUTHORITIES 7-1 8.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT 8-1 8.1 PURPOSE 8-1 8.2 COORDINATION WITH OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH OFFICIALS 8-1 l

l 8.3 NEW ENGLAND COMPACT 8-3 8.4  ; RESPONSE BY FEDERAL AGENCIES UNDER NASTER PLAN 8-4

-ii-

_______..._m___,.,___-,,,--,,,,,,___,_g.,

s l

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Section Title P, age 8.4.1 Federal Emergency Managemtnt Agency 8-4 8.4.2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 8-5 8.4.3 Department of Energy 8-6 8.4.4 Department of Agriculture 8-7 8.4.5 Department of Commerce 8-8 8.4.6 Department of Defense 8-9 8.4.7 Department of Health and Human Services 8-9 8.4.8 Department of Transportation 8-10 8.4.9 Environmental Protection Agency 8-10 8.4.10 National Communications System 8-11 APPENDICES A GLOSSARY AND REFERENCES B NEW ENGLAND COMPACT C NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE RADIATION ASSISTANCE PLAN ATTACHMENTS l 1 STATE OF MAINE FIELD OPERATIONS' GUIDE 2 LAND USE DATA 3 DISASTER LIAISON TEAM REPRESENTATIVES 4 FARMER NOTIFICATION PERSONNEL J

4s/

LIST OF TA8LES Number Title 2.2-1 PAGs for Direct Exposure 2.2-2 PAGs for Ingestion Pathway 3.1-1 Radiation Evaluation Equipment 3.1-2 Laboratory Analysis Capability 4.0-1 Response Levels for Preventative PAGs 4.0-2 Response Levels for Emergency PAGs 4.0-3 Average Daily Consumption of Specific Foods for the General Population 4.5-1 Actions Applicable to the Pasture-Milk-Man Pathway (N 4.5-2 Percent Reduction in Radioactive Contamination of Fruits and

\~M Vegetables by Processing 4.5-3 Actions Applicable to Soil 5.1-1 State of Maine Emergency Broadcast System - Participating Stations York and Cumberland Counties 8.4-1 Airports in Vicinity of Seabrook Station IPZ l

I

-iv-O

LIST OF FIGURES O

Number Title 1-1 Seabrook Station Ingestion Zone 3.1-1 Organization Chart for State of Maine Response to a Seabrook Station Accident 4.4-1 Decision Criteria for Recommended Ingestion Pathway Protective Actions 8.4-1 Federal Emergency Response Support Organization O

I f

O -v-

~. . _ . ., _ . .

SECTION 1

()

1.0 PURPOSE

' The purpose of this plan is to describe the means by which the general public in the State of. Maine will be protected from radiation which might be released from an accident at - Seabrook Station. In order to protect the public, two emergency planning zones (EPZ) have been designated around each nuclear power plant in the United States. They have been defined and are codified in Maine Public Law, Title 378, Chapter 17, Section 960. The first zone, which contains

the area within a 10-mile radius of the plant, is called the Plume Planning i

j' Zone. This is defined in Chapter 17 as the emergency planning zone. Within

this area, detailed planning to protect the public from radiation received by inhalation of and immersio') in radioactive effluents is made. No part of Maine is included within the Plume Planning Zone for Seabrook Station. A second zone, the Ingestion Planning Zone (IPZ), contains the area surrounding the power plant within 50 miles. .In this zone, detailed planning is done to mitigate effects of radioactive releases on the food chain. A portion of York County, Maine (refer to Figure 1-1) is contained in the ingestion planning zone for Seabrook Station, located in Seabrook, New Hampshire, and operated by Public Service of New Hampshire.

Ingestion planning includes consideration of protective actions to prevent or mitigate radioactive contamination of water, milk, or food which is consumed directly or indirectly by man. Thus, animal feed for farm animals whose milk or meat is consumed by man is also of concern. Emphasis is placed on preventing contamination of food in preference to protective actions following con-tamination.

1-1 ,

O

Figuro 1 - 1

/G us - t 5I (

GRAFTON CARROR l5 CUMBERLAND ,qu' , ,t) 1, .t ,y'\,,,

$! [

Z' m BELKNAP 3

,,,, )

i  !

MERRIMACK YORK /

STRAFF0Rkh,

/ 50 NILES t,

Seabrook Station .'s',i Ingestion Zone -sittSBOR0uas

""" /

f

/ , ,. p SEABROOK

< STATION k i ESSEX \

NEW HAMPSPIRE , ' g ,,, .

MASSACHUSETTS 4/ OCEAN MIDDLESEX  ?

WORCESTER ,,,

i

,, ;3 ..s NORFOL PL MOU h TOWNS IN YORK COUNTY

!V t I

watereoro e Acton a b,g 3,c, 1

4 Lyman b

[,,,, s ,, .

• %.c. COMMUNITIES INVOLVED

+4 q-s +,,,,

%,- Acton Lyman

\ .c,

• • "* Alfred North Berwick NIW HAMPSHIRE sourn O

. e.-< = Berwick Old Orchard Beach

/ v.. Biddeford Saco Dayton Sanford o.a

\, %g , 30 ,,tES Eliot Shapleigh N ., Kennebunk South Berwick

,, -u \ Kennebunkport Waterboro Kittery Wells 10 MILES Lebanon York 4

SEABROOK STATION

SECTION 2 O

V 2.0 SASIS

. 2.1 ENERGENCY PLANNING ZONES k

The basis for emergency planning for light water nuclear -power plants is found in NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants. This document describes the plans, personnel, facilities, and equipment which must be -in place to develop a satisfactory emergency response plan. NUREG-0654, in turn, was based on earlier studies, including the Reactor Safety Study, WASH 1400, and Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0396, EPA 520/1-78-016. NUREG-0396 defines and describes the basis for the 10 mile Plume Planning Zone and the 50 mile IPZ.

O 2.2 PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES Protective Action Guides (PAGs) are projected dose commitment levels which warrant protective action. The US EPA defined these levels as well as the basis for them in their Manual of Protective Action Guides for Nuclear Incidents, EPA 520/1-75-001. The guides are defined in terms of the projected dose that would occur if no protective action were taken in response to a radiological incident.

No consideration of prior doses is taken into account in defining them. On the other hand, when they are applied, the sum of the doses from immersion, inhala-tion, and ingestion must be considered as a basis for protective action decision-making. PAGs for direct exposure, as defined by EPA, are given in Table 2.2-1.

2-1 O

l

\

The Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human

) Services has developed PAGs for use in protecting the public from radiation exposure via the Ingestion Pathway (47 FR 47073). These guides are for expo-sures to radionuclides such as Iodine-131, Cesium-134, Cesium-137, Strontium-90, and Strontium-89 which can be deposited on pastures, food crops, and orchards, or on meats and produce ready for sale in retail markets. Of special importance is contamination of milk, either directly, or through the pasture-animal-milk pathway. The PAGs have been developed for whole body and thyroid exposures.

Whole body exposure guides include consideration of the effects of radiation on bone marrow and other organs. As with the PAGs established for direct exposure, these PAGs are defined in terms of projected dose and no prior dose is taken into account. These PAGs are listed in Table 2.2-2. The basis for the ingestion pathway PAGs is described in Background for Protective Action Recommendations: Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Food and Animal Feeds, HHS Publication FDA 82-8196.

Protective actions at the emergency protective action guide level may include bans on harvest and embargo or destruction of food, milk or water supplies.

Protective actions would be ordered by the Governor as advised by the Division of Health Engineering (DHE), the Department of Agriculture (DOA), and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

2-2 O

d

TABLE 2.2-1 PAGs FOR DIRECT EXPOSURE (Projected Dose in ress)

Population at Risk Whole-Body (Gamma) Thyroid ceneral Population 1-5 5-25 Emergency Workers 25 125 Lifesaving Activities 75 (a)

NOTE:

(a) No specific upper limit is given for thyroid exposure, f.

Reference:

EPA 520/1-75-001 l

I l

l l

1 of 1

T TABLE 2.2-2 i

PAGs FOR INGESTION PATHWAY

.(Projected Dose in rems) i j Population at Risk Whole-Body Thyroid Preventive Actions .5 1.5 Emergency Actions 5 15 l

l

Reference:

47 FR 47073 L

I i-h +

4 I

i t

1 i-i I

I 1

I s

I i

! 1 of 1 1_ .. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ .

SECTION 3 0 3.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS

3.1 DESCRIPTION

This section describes the Maine State agencies and organizations which would respond to a radiological release from Seabrook Station which might impact the State of Maine. The role of each agency and the management structure which displays how they are coordinated will be described. An accident at Seabrook Station could impact the ingestion pathway within the State of Maine. The orga-nizational structure is directed toward protection of the public from radiation received from the ingestion of water, milk, and other food. The organizations which would respond would include, but not be restricted to:

Governor's Office Maine Bureau of Civil Emergency Preparedness Maine Bureau of Health Maine Department of Agriculture Maine Department of Marine Resources Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Maine Department of Environmental Protection University of Maine Cooperative Extension Service 9

In the event of an accident at Seabrook Station which has the potential of affecting the State of Maine, the plant operators will notify the New Hampshire State Police which notifies the New Hampshire Civil Defense Agency which, in turn, notifies the Maine State Police. The Maine State Police notify the Maine Bureau of Civil Emergency Preparedness (MECEP), the Division of Health Engineering of the Bureau of Health, and the Governor's Of fice. MECEP would notify additional State response organizations following activation of the State Emergency Operations Center (EOC).

3-1 O

The State EOC is located within the offices of MECEP in Augusta, Maine. Upon notification that a response to an accident at Seabrook Station may be required,

's,/ the EOC will be activated and staffed with personnel from State response agen-cies and organizations. The agencies represented at the EOC are presented on Figure 3.1-1.

In addition to staffing the State EOC, personnel f rom DHE, MECEP and State Police will be dispatched to the Incident Field Of fice/ Emergency Operations Facility (IF0/ EOF) in Newington, New Hampshire; the Governor's Office would dispatch personnel to the Media Center and sampling teams will be dispatched to take samples within the IPZ. York County personnel will operate out of the County EOC in Alfred, Maine.

Radiological surveys will be conducted in accordance with the Field Operation Guide (FOG), Attachment 1 of this plan. Teams consisting of two or more persons from DHE, DOA, and DEP will collect environmental samples for assessing the ingestion pathway. These samples may include the following:

l l o fruit and vegetables

(/ o meat and meat products o eggs o soil and vegetation o milk o drinking water o surface water The food and environmental samples will be collected in accordance with the FOG.

Sample analysis will be performed at the Public Health Laboratory in accordance with standard laboratory procedures. Radiological evaluation eqiupment and laboratory capabilities are tabulated in Tables 3.1-1 and 3.1-2, respectively, t

3-2 O

The DHE Nuclear Engineering Specialist at the IF0/ EOF will coordinate ingestion pathway decisions for Maine with accident assessment personnel of New Hampshire, O Massachusetts, and the Utility. This coordination will ensure consistency of actions among the states and will ensure effective utilization of Federal and interstate assistance. The Nuclear Engineering Specialist will keep in constant communication with the Manager, Radiation Control Program and the Division Director of DHE at the State EOC and DHE offices to ensure that response actions are consistent with other needs within the State.

Farmers and food processing facilities within the IPZ will be contacted by per-sonnel from the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Service and the U.S.

Department of Agriculture. They will distribute informational brochures and give farmers advice and recommendations as to prevention or mitigation of radioactive contamination of food products. (The USDA Food and Agriculture Council will have personnel available at the York County EOC to provide infor-mation to farmers who call the EOC.) Additional information will be transmitted

-to the public via the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS).

In the recovery stage, when plant conditions have stabilized, general infor-mation will be transmitted by the EBS and specific recommendations will be made to the Governor's Office through MECEP by DHE, DOA, and DEP. Based on analysis of biota samples, fishing and hunting may be permitted by Department of Marine Resources and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. With passage of time, weathering, and decontamination efforts, it may be possible to release food products to the public. When it is not cost-ef fective to store, process, or treat food pro-ducts, the DOA may direct that they be destroyed.

3.2 AGENCY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3.2.1 Common Responsibilities Each agency in the Emergency Response Organization has the following responsi-bilities.

3-3 O

1. Maintain an adequate smergency response capability by ensuring that the p agency can be notified and mobilized.

s

2. Ensure the agency can support the emergency response effort on a 24-hour basis ~(two 12-hour shifts) for the duration of a protracted emergency period.

3. Staff the State's emergency response facilities as described in Section 4.0 of this plan.

4. Keep the operations talephone directory current by reporting emergency response personnel and telephone r:omber changes as soon as they occur to MECEP.

5. Ensure that each member of the agency assigned to participate in emergency response is knowledgeable of both agency and individual i

responsibilities as well as with agency implementation procedures. Each assigned individual also should be generally familiar with the plan.

( 6. Ensure that a copy of the complete Ingestion Pathway Plans, including l

local government plans, are accessible to emergency response personnel.

7. Participate in emergency response drills and exercises.

I 3.2.2 Agency Roles The Governor's Of fice, MECEP, and DHE play a primary role in response to a radiological accident impacting the ingestion pathway. They comprise the team that has the decision-making authority to implement emergency response actions.

3-4 f

l

. - - . - - . - . . ~ . , - . . - _ - . _ . . _ - -

- - - _ - , . . - . - . _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ ~ . _ . . . _ . _ _ . . . - . . . -.,

DHE, DOA, and DEP will provide personnel for sampling teams who will collect samples of soil, water, milk, crops, forage, and other biota. The methodology

% used is found in the FOG which the three organizations keep current. Lists of personnel who form the teams also are found in the FOG (Attachment 1).

If conditions warrant, DOA may embargo or destroy milk or other food products.

The Departme.nt of Marine Resources may prohibit fishing or shellfish harvesting from offshore water or destroy ocean fish or shellfish. The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife have similar authority regarding wildlife or fish harvested from inland waterways. The Bureau of Health has authority to impound, quarantine, treat, or otherwise control water supplies.

3.2.3 Role Description for State Agencies

1. Governor's Of fice - The Governor commands and controls emergency response operations through the MECEP and other State agencies. The Governor makes final decisions on protective measures based on recommendations by DHE. A representative of the Governor's Office will be at the State EOC and v another representative will go to the Media Center in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station which has the potential of impacting the State of Maine. If a need for Federal assistance is determined, the Governor or his representative at the EOC will request it through the Federal Radiological Emergency Reponse Plan (FRERP).

2. Bureau of Civil Emergency Preparedness - The MECEP coordinates emergency response actions on the Governor's behalf. MECEP prepares emergency response plans, provides training, and maintains the State EOC. MECEP coordinates recovery efforts after the emergency has ended. Upon a declared State of Emergency, MECEP has authority to direct all emergency response activities.

3-5 O

rh 3.

(v) Bureau of Health - The Division of Health Engineering (DHE) of the Bureau of Health (part of the Department of Human Services) provides technical advice and recommends protective actions and recovery actions. As needed, the DHE would recommend to the Governor that assistance be requested from adjoining states through the New England Compact or from Federal agencies througn FRERP. In the case of the New England Compact, the authority to request aid has been delegated to the Commissioner of Human Services and then to the Director of DHE. In the event of an accident at the Seabrook Station 'with the potential of impacting the State of Maine, DHE will dispatch the Manager, Radiation Control Program to the State EOC and the Nuclear Engineering Specialist to the IF0/ EOF in Newington, NH. The Manager, Radiation Control Program will serve as the Radiological Health Coordinator at the Maine EOC as described in the FOG. The radiological sampling teams will be directed by the Radiological Health Coordinator af ter conferring with the Nuclear Engineering Specialist at the IF0/ EOF.

These teams consist of at least two persons f rom DHE, DOA, and DEP. The Public Health Laboratory will provide support to the monitoring tear.is ,

including providing and reading Thermoluminecent Dosimeters (ILDs), and sample analysis.

4. Maine Department of Aariculture - DOA will dispatch the Milk Technician to the State EOC and personnel to staf f sampling teams. The Director of Regulations or his designee will oversee all DOA activities, and will direct embargo of consumables as needed. DOA has authority to embargo all food products within the State of Maine.

5. Department of Environmental Protection - DEP will provide support service and technical recommendations to the Bureau of Health. Personnel from DEP will be available for serving on sampling teams.

6. Department of Marine Resources - The Department of Marine Resources is a law enforcement agency and is authorized to enforce any State law. They

(

( 3-6

t I

are authorized to close taking of marine mollusks or any other marine n food source and have the right to embargo"or destroy food taken from the h sea. In the event o'f a Seabrook Station accident, the Division Commander in Portland is notified, and the Division 1 Commander (Lieutenant) would report to the York County EOC. The Deputy Chief of Marine Patrol would go to the State EOC in the event of an accident which could affect marine food sources.

7. Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife - The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife is a law enforcement agency and is authorized to enforce any State law. In the event of an accident at Seabrook Station the Division A (Gray Region) Lieutenant would (if not already there) proceed to the Gray Regional Headquarters. If a contamination risk occurs, hunting and fishing can be interdicted. Inland Fiaheries and Wildlife could use land vehicles and aircraf t to notify persons on public land of the need to take protective actions.

8. University of Maine Cooperative Extension Service - Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of an incident at Seabrook Station, the University of Maine Cooperative Extension

- Service, assisted by the Food and Agriculture Council, the Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Services, the Soil Conservation Service, and the Farmers Home Administration, will notify f armers and other food producers and processors within the IPZ of the need for protective actions.

They maintain lists of farmers and food producers within the IPZ of Seabrook Station. They maintain a supply of public information brochures for farmers and food processing facilities.

9. Maine Department of Transportation - The Maine Ocpartment of Transportation would deliver barricades to traffic control points.

3-7 0

10. Maine State Police - The Maine State Police would receive notification of an accident at Seabrook Station and would notify MECEP, DHE, and the h Governor's Office. They establish and staff traffic control points and provide law enforcement.

A chart of the Emergency Response Organization for the State of Maine in response to an accident at Seabrook Station is shown on Figure 3.1-1.

Additional agencies may be called upon on an as-needed basis. On a long-term basis, not all agencies may be represented in the State EOC but communications would be available to enable conferencing and decision making.

5 i

O I

i l

l l

3-8 l

1

- --,n-- ,--,-g-g,.,-----v.., -,,--m--,,,w-e--.- - -

e v

a w

o r

c N l- i M

f', N n

o r

t u

e d N e x t

a y u

l a a r v -

E X x

n R R o R 0 0 i a R 0 r 0 0 t m R 9 R 0 h 0 0 a m 9 0 0 / R . 1 1 i a 0 9 1 1 R m R f - -

d G 0 - - - m n R R a 5 R r r x 0 0 i m m R - u m m 0 0 0 -

0 2 O O 5 2 2 0 1 1 a

t e r B 0h 0/ x m 0R T o5 m N a r c E h h M p / 0 P l R 0 I A 0, U 2 x Q) 0 Ee 3 1 n d

- Ni l 1 Oa e IM i 2 3 T F Af x x x x x x x x x x f

/O

" E L

8 A

Uo L

Ae Vt b

a 1

o T Ea L t

NS O(

I T s 1 A

I l / Q Q D e A 0 53 0 3 8 2 As As A d 5 0 1 2 0 5 8 3 4 4 e 2 e R o 1 7 77 7 9 8 1 7 s 1 o 0 o M - - 3 - - 5 4 - 2 - - p 8d 8d C V - V 1 0 6 V S - V V i a - a A O P D 0 7 - O D D D D h DB DB P C C C 1 5 L C D H C C c U U r

e r

u t s c n l e n k n n c c a e e at e r e e i i f n e ca e e e e w n n u i r ii r v r r o n x x a o o n l o nc o s o o c a i i h s s a r t ho t d t t e m d d s a a M e ic cs H c n c c d l n n r n n b es D i a i i a e e e a a a E V TA M V L V V R G B B H P P l

l r r r r r R R a e r r s e e e e w t e) e) e b eb b b r r in e l C l C a r r m im m m e e M pA pA d e e

• a Pa a a s s h y mV mV a t t e h h h h n n T a a B e e p C eC C C e e e S0 S0 m m y i d d .

v 2 2 m i i T S n t n n n n n r r1 r1 l s s D D D n o uo o o o o M. u i( i ( i o o L L L Z I CI I I C C G S A A F D D T T T O t i

y t 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 1 8 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 5 8 8 a 1 u

Q

l il l e

v .

a sl ia w sn o yo r

% c l i at

' i M ni

't ad d

oa n t o ue r ar t a u r e oe f r N

d e e sh tT t

a y c u a u l r d .

a - o0 v X r0 p0 E

D D 8 n L L n .

o a L L osA i eC i m t m R R x x x x x siM a a m m sr i G ie0 d 1 1 fS0 a 1 R 5 e8 a 6h t x x x x x t s e

e f B ooi t r y e rdS a ae h rt e l

p x x x x b ch i et A l n no aot c

1) d h d d l tl e 1 e e il t u i wac e 2

% 3n F i ren f

", Et Ln ern t ao o

Bo b u c 2 Ac a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ps T( L mrs ooi ct ocI rea

1. E VG ctN 2 I s s ie l 5 0 l e e F md3 e - 7 ke i 0 i0 0 B A 4 x d R - rd 0 r0 r0 0 I I 3 0 K c3 o L D ao 0 e0 e1 1 S C C 4 8i M T U MM 7 S8 S8 8 D P P 2 pe noh acT s

s s s so r t t t ar .

e n n n ht s r c c e e e cr u e i i a a a a a m m m a ree t n n n n r r r r w w r ro re re re r ept c i o o a r r r r a a r ag ar ar ar r ssn a l s s m e e e e h h e ea eu eu eu e y i f r a a k b b b b s s b l c l s l s l s b l rr u e n n c n n n n r r n ci ca ca ca n aop n b a a e a a a a a a a uh ue ue ue a nt a E P P B C C C C H H C NC NM NM NM C Aay M l p l l o l l eic e e ntd nnr r n n

) o . n n aia 1 t t a a r l l l h ch

( a n h h e a a a cs r r r i C C ) t n n n a i 2 e e b c )  % n o o o t t n d d i S 0 0  % 0 u i i i e l od a a l 0 0 5 2 I I n o t r t r t r Br ucn e

p e e a d 0 0 ( ( a a o C re re re /e Mia R R C i 8 1 N N c ot ot ot at l y u i i i a pn pn pn h n 0ie T D D D q A A L L 3 4 l t ou ou ou pu 0Sl L L L i H H e e x x i e ro ro ro l o 0 b T T T L P P G G 3 4 S B PC PC PC AC 8da nl sai r t y

e iiv rLa a

i ee t  : SGs n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E a T e e 'A u O hhC Q N TTM l , tl l,

p

\ NJ \J TABLE 3.1-2 LA80RATORY ANALYSIS CAPABILITY (State of Maine)

Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency Medium Analysis (hrs.) 8-hr day 24-hr day 8-hr day 24-hr day j

Milk or Gamma Scan 1.67-Normal (100 4 12 vegetation or min. count) water .33-Emergency (20 24 72 min. count)

! Water or Gross Alpha 4 - Normal (1 1) 2 6

! precipitation Gross Beta 1.75-Emergency 30 120 (25 1)

Water or H-3 1.5 - Normal 5 15 precipitation .5-Emeroency 16 48 Air filter or Gross Alpha 1.67-Normal 5 15 dry desposition Gross Beta .23 Emeroency 24 72 TLD Chip External Gamma 200 600 200 600 i

1 i

NOTES:

Assumption is made that contaminated samples will not need as long a counting time as under normal, non-emergency con-ditions.

Total semple capability for gross alpha and gross beta is included under water or precipitation.

1 of 1

O O O FIGURE 3.1-1 I

ORGANIZATION CHART FOR STATE OF MAINE RESPONSE TO A SEABROOK STATION ACCIDENT GOVERNOR I

BUREAU OF CIVIL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS I

COORDINATION I

I I I I I I

Bureau Department Inland of Department Department Maine of Fish Health of of State Marine and Aariculture Transportation Police Resources Wildlife Division of Health YORK COUNTY Engineerina FARMER NOTIFICATION TEAMS FIELD MONITORING TEAMS l l l l CES ASCS SCS FmHA l l DHE DOA DEP Farmers Home Department of Environmental Protection Administration Department of Aariculture Soil Conservation Service Division of Health Enaineerina Agriculture Stabilization

& Conservation Service Cooperative Extension Service

SECTION 4 O

'4.0 PROTECTIVE RESPONSE Protective actions for the ingestion pathway are designed to minimize oppor-tunities for the human consumption of radiologically contaminated material.

Preventative protective actions listed in Section 4.5 will be considered for implementation if measured concentrations of radionuclides exceed those given in Table 4.0-1.

Emergency protective actions listed in Section 4.5 will be considered for imple-mentation if measured concentrations of radionuclides exceed those given in Table 4.0-2.

! Preventative or emergency protective actions will be implemented as appropriate if the projected total intake exceeds the total intake values for the radionuclides listed in Tables 4.0-1 or 4.0-2. The Manager of the Radiation Control Program at the State EOC will perform the procedure for estimating pro-Jected total intake as part of formulating protective action recommendations for i

the ingestion pathway. The pMw:ted total intake is equal to the sum of the projected intakes for a radionuclide for all food items in which that radionuclide has been measured. Tae projected intake for a specific food item is equal to the product of the measured concentration of the radionuclide in the food item, the average daily consumption rate for the food ites (refer Table 4.0-3), and the estimated days of intake.

l l I I I I I I l projected l l measured concen-l l average daily consump-l l estimated time l l intake, pCil = l tration, pCi/Kg l X l tion rate, kg/ day l X l of intake, days l L __I L _J L __I L __I 4-1 O

The estimated time of intake should consider the specific food ites, the food distribution system (retail market versus home use), and the half-life of the O- radionuclide.

4.1 MILK CONTROL Preventing contamination of milk is an important element of the Ingestion Pathway protective actions. Actions for controlling consumption of contaminated milk are classified as preventive or emergency protective actions. Preventive protective actions include two approaches. One involves protecting animal feed and ordering dairy farmers to use only stored feed rather than grazing the herd on contaminated pasture. In Maine, contamination of dairy feed is not likely to be a significant problem, since most feed is stored.

The second preventive protective action is applied to contaminated milk.

{

It involves delaying its release to market or diverting it to other uses In addition to the above, emergency protective actions may require condemning and destroying milk supplies to prevent dihtribution to the market.

O As recommended by DHE, control of milk will be implemented by the Maine DOA by direct contact with the dairy farm owners / operators. Lists of commercial dairy operations within the Seabrook Station IPZ are maintained by the Cooperative Extension Service and at the State EOC.

4.2 WATER CONTROL Water supplies that receive a major portion of their water from the surrounding watershed will be the focus of protective actions for water control. The soil may have been contaminated and run-off may concentrate radioactive materials in the water supply. Reservoirs that are filled by pumping from flowing streams can be protected by prohibiting pumping when run-off causes an increase in con-tamination. As necessary, the Manager, Drinking Water Program of the Division of Health Engineering will direct the control of use of water from potentially 4-2 O

contaminated public surface water supplies within the IPZ. Public surface water h

o supplies can be quarantined until testing for radioactivity levels can be under-taken to confirm or refute the need for control. Wells and groundwater sources are not likely to be contaminated but may be tested if they are muddy or other-wise suspected of having received runoff from contaminated soils.

4.3 F000 CONTROL Field and orchard crops or other foods may be contaminated by deposition from the radioactive plume. These foods may be stored until the radioactivity has (

decayed or has been treated. Emergency protective actions will be used only if crops have been so heavily contaminated the preventive measures are ineffective.

Emergency actions will prevent food from entering the market place.

The DOA will implement control of harvesting, sale of crops, and, if necessary, condemnation of contaminated foods.

Lists of the commercial agricultural facilities within the IPZ are located at the University of Maine Cooperative Extension Service, the State EOC, and the IF0/ EOF.

Deposition of particulates on the ground, paved surf aces, and other surfaces may increase background levels and contaminate soil. The long-term effects of this increase in background levels will be determined and actions taken as appropriate. Recovery actions are designed to address these longer term problems and are discussed in Section 4.6.

Maps for recording Ingestion Pathway data, including locations of key land use, agricultural facilities, water supply location and related information, are kept at the State EOC, York County EOC, and at the IF0/ EOF. These maps, which are too large to be included in this plan, are used to identify areas and facilities where protective actions may be necessary and for recording survey and moni-toring data.

4-3 O

1

4.4 DECISION PROCESS FOR SELECTION OF PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR INGESTION PATHWAY EXPOSURES To facilitate rapid decision-making, a radioactivity level which corresponds to the PAG for a particular food pathway will be used. This level is the amount of radiation in food, water, or animal feed that would ultimately result in exceeding of the PAG if it were allowed to pass up through the food chain to the human consumers. For example, if the level of Iodine-131 on a pasture exceeds the precalculated radioactivity level, the human dose resulting from the pastura-animal-milk pathway would exceed the PAG if preventative actions for milk were not taken. This radioactivity-level-to-PAG-dose-conversion-calculation has been described by Food and Drug Administration of the US 5

Department of Health and Human Services (FDA/HHS) in 43 FR 58790. Precalculated levels for specific pathways are contained in Tables 4.0-1 and 4.0-2. Total dose commitment from all pathways and for all nuclides taken together will be calculated in determining whether preventive or emergency PAGs have been exceeded.

The following discussion traces the four-step decision process for Ingestion v Pathway exposure. To facilitate understanding, Figure 4.4-1 describes this pro-cedure by means of a flow chart. The term " response level" refers to the pre-calculated radioactivity levels discussed below.

Block #1 - Determine whether any Ingestion Pathway may be exposed to radiation.

Input consists of advisories from the Utility, meteorological input, (e.g., wind direction) and field measurements. These data are used to calculate projected intake. If the answer is no, further consideration of protective actions for the Ingestion Pathway is not required. If the answer is yes, progress to the next decision step.

4-4 0

Block #2 - Determine whether a preventive PAG may be exceeded for one or more of the three Ingestion Pathways taken together. This entails using the response levels for milk, other foods, and water to determine whether the preventive PAGs, listed in Table 2.2-2 may be exceeded. If the answer is negative, no pro-tective action is required. If the answer is positive for the Ingestion Pathways, the Governor will be advised to order preventive actions until more definitive analysis can be undertaken. Figure 4.4-1 presents the preventive actions in parallel for the three ingestion paths. Each involves control of the ingestible material by the appropriate State Agency followed by field testing to more accurately determine the measurement of the level of contamination. For example, the Department of Marine Services has the authority to prohibit shellfish harvesting if contamination is suspected. In the event that har-vesting of shellfish is interdicted, because of contamination, the Department of Marine Services may restrict harvesting and control access to harvesting areas.

Collection of field samples is described in the Field Operations Guide (FOG).

Upon activating preventive actions, proceed to the third decision step.

i I

Block #3 -

Determine whether emergency PAGs are, or may be, exceeded. The determination is based first on a comparison of dose projections to the Emergency PAG 1evels given in Table 2.2-2. If dose projections indicate a potential for exceeding PAGs due to the ingestible material, contrr. or condem-j nation of specific consumables may be directed pending recommended verification by field area. If field data confirm predicted contamination, condemnation or storage for suitable future use may be ordered. If field data show levels below the appropriate response levels, State control of the ingestible material may be relinquished. In either event, with advice from the Director of DHE or his designee the Governor or his designee will issue advisories on the nature of the controls for each ingestible material and the means for minimizing ingestion of radioactive materials.

4-5 O

. -. . .-. - -- - ~ _ _ _ - - - -- .

i.  :

t To facilitate determination that a PAG may be exceeded, response levels for five

~

s critical radionuclides (I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Sr-90 and Sr-89) are given in

. Table 4.0-1 for preventative PAG levels and Table 4.0-2 for emergency PAG leais for area deposition, forage concentration, and peak milk cctivity.

4.5 PROTECTIVE ACTIONS 4

Actions are appropriate when the health benefit associated with the acheivable l reduction in dose outweighs the undesirable health, economic, and social fac-tors. It is the intent of this section to outiine protective actions which .

! should be considered for implementation in order to reduce the consequences in the ingestion pathway if the preventative or emergency PAGs are exceeded.

Several of the actions listed below are easily implemented, and may be con- ,

sidered for implementation as precautionary measures during the time period when j post-plume data are being evaluated, or when it is reasonable to assume from early field data that the level of radioactive material in the environment is likely to approach or exceed the PAGs. It is recommended that once protective actions are initiated, they continue for a time period sufficient to mitigate l the radiological consequences via the ingestion pathway. Tables 4.5-1, 4.5-2, and 4.5-3 give additional information concerning certain protective actions.

i i

! To facilitate protective action decision-making, copies of Guidance on Offsite i

l Emergency Radiation Measurement Systems -

Phase 2: The Milk Pathway, i WINCO-1009, and Phase 3: Water and Non-Dairy Food Pathway, WINCO-1012, will be i

l maintained at the State EOC and utilized as needed. A copy of HHS Publication FDA 82-8196 also will be maintained at the State EOC as a further protective t

action decision-making guide. Tables 4.5-1, 4.5-2, and 4.5-3 are excerpted from the latter publication and provide additional information concerning certain protective actions. These tables are intended for the Manager of-the Radiation Control Program in assessing the relative merits of protective actions that are available.

4-6 I ,

• r it"*f-'*f*wT'N'%=w".N+-"=-*=Hr-rt*=-at==="m'=-***-**-"_ ewes- wr-WW-&he W vd' .

W TJ, ., P W TFWM V '" WNFF'M74- WWF- WT*W W

a

. V.

([ ,

4 4 ,

4.6.1 Preventive Protective Actions 3

V~ For ' pasture: Removal of lactating dairy cows from contaminated pastures

f. and substitution of uncontaminated stored feed.

'F L 4 Substitute source of covered uncontaminated water. Do not use surf ace waters.

For milk: Withholding of contaminated milk from the market to allow radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides. This say be achieved by storage of frozen fresh milk, frozen concentrated milk, or frozen con-centrated milk products.

Storage for prolonged times at reduced temperatures also is feasible provided ultrahigh temperatures pasteurization techniques are employed for processing.

~

/ For fruits and venetables: Washing, brushing, scrubbing, or peeling to remove surface contamination.

Preservation by canning, freezing, and dehydration or storage to permit radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides.

[

4 s' For arainst Milling and polishing

't Joe drinkina watsr: Avoid use of surface water (streams, lakes, ponds) for human and animal consumption.

i Limit ingestion of potable water until source has been approved for con-

sumption. -

t

~i

.%~

Use bottled water and canned beverages and juices as water sources. ,

1 9 i S

4-7 s

I f

-st t

+

i  ;

i For other food products: Process to remove surface contamination.

For meat and meat products: Intake of Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 by an adult via the meat pathway may exceed that of the milk pathway; there-fore, levels of cesium in milk which approach the " response level" should cause surveillance and protective actions for meat as appropriate.

For animal feed other than pasture: Action should be on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the relationship between the radionuclide concentration in the animal feed and the concentration of the radio'nuclide in human food.

i For fish and shellfish: Suspend fishing operations of commercial fish firms and charter fishing boats until resumption is recommended.

Check the catch made on the day of the accident.

4.5.2 Emergency Protective Actions

' Responsible officials should isolate food containing radioactive material to

prevent its intreductinn into commerce and determine whether condemnation or another disposition is app 'eriate. Before taking this action, the following factors should be considered.

o The availability of other possible protective actions.

I l

o The reli le proportion of the total diet by weight represented by the item in question, o The importance of the particular food in nutrition and the availability of uncontaminated food or substitutes having the same nutritional prop-erties.

4-8 O

o The relative contribution of other foods and other radionuclides to the total projected dose.

o The time and effort required to implement corrective action.

4.6 RECOVERY Once radiological contamination levels corresponding to the total projected com-mitments below emergency PAG 1evels have been attained, consideration will be given to removing restrictions on harvesting, processing and consumption of food, and consumption of water, on a case-by-case basis. Removal of restric-tions will be directed by the Governor or his designee, based upon recommen-dations from DHE, DOA, and DEP. In addition, the assistance of Federal Agencies, including EPA and FDA, will be utilized, as needed.

Following the initiation of recovery operations by the Governor, the Operations Officer of MECEP or his designee will confer with the heads of each of the agen-cies or departments within the State EOC to determine the requirements to return the affacted areas to normal operations. Items to be considered include, but are not restricted, to the following:

o coordinating area radiological surveys and evaluating data; o mobilizing necessary resources, manpower, and equipment; o determining traffic control requirements; o determining communication needs; o determining the need for Federal assistance; and o coordinating with other states.

Positions established during emergency response will initially remain active during the recovery phase. As the recovery phase progresses, the Governor may allcw selected positions of the emergency response organization to return to their non-emergency mode of operation.

4-9 O

Long-term recovery plans will use these data to determine the action necessary O to take in order to reach the non-occupational whole-body exposure limits.

4.6.1 Recovery from Food and Water Control Restrictions on food and water will be lif ted when DHE has determined that levels of radioactive material found in food and water supplies have decreased below the PAGs for preventive actions established by the FDA given in Table 2.2-2. Use will be restricted until the levels of radiation associated with the ruclear power plant emergency have fallen below the preventive PAG 1evels.

l O

4-10 O

e

TA8LE 4.0-1 d RESPONSE LEVELS FOR PREVENTATIVE PAGs a

Infant as critical segment of population b c c 1311 134Cs 137Cs 90Sr 89sr Initial Activity Area 0.13 2 3 0.5 8 Deposition (microcuries/

square meter) d Forage Concentration 0.05 0.8 1.3 0.18 3 (microcuries/ kilogram)

Peak Milk 0.01 0.15 0.24 0.009 0.14 (microcuries/ liter)

Total Intake 0.09 4 7 0.2 2.6 (microcuries)

O NOTES:

a Newborn infant includes fetus (pregnant woman) as critical segment of popu-lation for Icdine-131. For other radionuclides, " infant" refers to child less than one year of age.

b From fallout, Iodine-131 is the only radioiodine of significance with respect to milk contamination beyond the first day. In case of a reactor accident, the cumulative intake of Iodine-133 via milk is about 2 percent of Iodine-131 assuming equivalent deposition.

c Intake of Cesium via the meat / person pathway for adults may exceed that of the milk pathway; therefore, such levels in milk should cause surveillance and protective actions for meat as appropriate. If both Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 are equally present, as might be expected for reactor accidents, the response levels should be reduced by a factor of 2.

d Fresh weight.

Reference:

47 FR 47073, October 22, 1982 0

1 of 1

O O O TABLE 4.0-2 RESPONSE LEVELS FOR EMERGENCY PAGs a b b 131 134 135 90 89 i I Cs Cs Sr Sr l c d c c c Infant Adult Infant Adult Infant Adult Infant Adult Infant Adult Initial Activity Area Deposition (micro- 1.3 18 20 40 30 50 5 20 80 1600 curies / square meter) e Forage Concentration (cierocuries/ kilogram) 0.5 7 8 17 13 19 8 30 30 700 Paak Milk (microcuries/ liter) 0.15 2 1.5 3 2.4 4 0.4 1.4 1.4 30 Total Intake (Dicrocuries) 0.9 10 40 70 70 80 2 7 26 400 NOTES:

a From fallout, Iodine-131 is the only radioiodine of significance with respect to milk contamination beyond the first day. In case of a reactor accident, the cumulative intake of Iodine-133 via milk is about 2 percent of Iodine-131 assuming equivalent deposition.

b Intake of Cesium via the meat / person pathway for adults may exceed that of the milk pathway; therefore, such levels in milk should cause surveillance and protective actions for meat as appropriate. If both Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 are equally present, as might be expected for reactor accidents, the response levels should be reduced by a factor of 2.

c Newborn infant includes fetus (pregnant women) as critical segment of population for Iodine-131.

l d " Infant" refers to child less than one year of age.

• Fresh weight.

Raference: 47 FR 47073, October 22, 1982 1 of 1

TABLE 4.0-3 AVERAGE DAILY CONSUMPTION OF SPECIFIC F000S FOR THE GENERAL POPULATION Average Consumption Food (kiloaram/ day)

Milk, cream, cheese, ice cream .570 Fats, oils .055 Flour, cereal .091 Bakery products .150 Meat .220 Poultry . .055 Fish and shellfish .023 Eggs .055 Sugar, syrups, honey, molasses, etc .073 Potatoes, sweet potatoes .105 Vegetables, fresh (excluding potatoes) .145 Vegetables, canned, frozen, dried .077 Vegetables, juice (single strength) .009 Fruit, fresh .165 Fruit, canned, frozen, dried .036 Fruit, juice (single strength) .045 Other beverages (soft drinks, coffee, alcoholic) .180 Soup and gravies (mostly condensed) .036 Nuts and peanut butter .009 TOTAL ,

2.099 NOTE:

If a mixture of radionuclides is present, the sum of all the ratios of the pro-jected total intake of each specific radionuclide to its specific response level for total intake should be less than one.

O4 1 of 1

O O O l

TABLE 4.5-1 ACTIONS APPLICABLE TO T!!E PASTURE-MILK-MAN PATiedAY Radionuclide(s) for which Protective Practically Action Action is Applicable Effectiveness Safety (effort required)

Applicable to cattle a

Provide alternate source of 131 , 90 , 89 , 137 (+) (+) (+) Good uncontaminated animal feed I Sr Sr- Cs l b I Add stable iodine to cattle ration 131 Marginal Some hazard (+)

I Add stable calcium to cattle ration 89 , 90 Marginel- Some hazard (+) l Sr Sr Add binders to cattle ration 137 , 89 , 90 Marginal 00estionable- (+)

Cs Sr Sr Substitute sources of uncontaminated water 137 , 89 , 90 (+) (+) (+)c Cs Sr Sr l

Applicable to milk d

Condemnation of milk 131 , 89 , 90 , 137 (+) (+) (+) Good I Sr Sr Cs l

Divert fresh milk to processed milk products 131 , 89 (+) (+) (+) Good Process fresh - store 90 , 137 Marginal Questionable (+)

Sr Cs Process fresh - store 131 , (+) (+) (+) Good I

e Retaove radionuclides from milk 131 , 89 , 90 , 137 (+) (+) (+) Good I Sr Sr Cs 1 of 2

! r 4

[

4 i

i 1 ,

I t  !

! TABLE 4.5-1 (continued)  !

I r

NOTES: t i li i

a (+): 90% effective d Somewhat dependent on volume l b Marginal: less than 90% effective e No processing plant presently available j c Depends on availability 1

Reference:

HHS Publication FDA 82-8196

! I i  :

r i  ;

i I l i t i

E i

r i

t I

. 2 of 2  :

1 l

t i

i

)

O O O TABLE 4.5-2 PERCENT REDUCTION IN RADIOACTIVE CONTANINATION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES BY PROCESSING Study 1 (60)

Normal food preparation for freezina, cannina, or dehydration Study 2 (61) Study 3 (62) a a External Contamination Internal Combination Cannina Home Preparation 90 137 90 137 90 90 Sr Cs Sr Cs Sr Sr Spinach 92 95 64 88 22 -

Snap beans - - - -

62 -

Carrots - - - -

19 19 Tomatoes - -

65 -

21 28 Broccoli 94 92 72 89 - -

Praches ~100 ~100 ~100 ~100 50 -

Onions - - - - -

37 Potatoes - - - - -

24 Cabbage - - - - -

55 Green beans - - - - -

36 NOTE:

a Contamination on surface is referred to as external contamination. Internal contamination is contamination of fleshy portion of product from surface deposition of radionuclide.

Reference:

HHS Publication FDA 82-8196 i

l 4 of 1

. T

, TABLE 4.5-3 1

I ACTIONS APPLICABLE TO SOIL Radionuclide(s) for l Action which Protective- Practically .

(Applicable to Soil) Action is Applicable Effectiveness Safety (effort required) b Soil management - minimum tillage: 90 Poor to fair Not Applicable Good Sr deep plowing with root inhibition 90 Good to fair Not Applicable Poor Sr j irrigation & leaching 90 Poor Not Applicable Good Sr liming & fertilizing 90 Poor to fair Not Applicable Good i

Removing contaminated surface crops 90 Most poor Not Applicable Poor to fair Sr Racoval of soil surface contamination:

wrra weather with vegetation cover 90 Good to fair Not Applicable Poor cold weather no cover 90 Good to poor Not Applicable Good to poor 3

Sr i NOTES: '

1 a Rating for effort required Good - not significantly more than normal field practice i Fair - extra equipment or labor required j Poor - very great requirement of equipment, materials, and labor b Rating for reducing Strontium 90 l Good - 95% reduction Fair 95% reduction Poor - 75% reduction R3ference: HHS Publication FDA 82-8196 i

1 of 1

r is Time to Release ingestion Pathway NO and  : Esposed to L No Action Requwed Nature of Release Radiahon

?

FES Might Preventive Action Protected Dose ,

PAG Via Response Leveg -

for An Nuctedes La Exceeded for L No Action Requwed

= LE:LK

• OTHER FOOO

< WATER

?

XLg f 0R SURFACE YL} FOR MILM jL} FOR OTHER FOOD au TER SUPPL Y d

t

'f Den of Agncumure Dept.of Agriculture DMS Directs Control of Recommends Mac6ag Da6ry Orders Foods Held 6n Place Pubhc Surface Water Supplies.

Aa'=*'s oa stored Food ad,,,e os,de yie medie  % o,me,ine ne.ou,oe, l

l Controts Shellfish Harvesting l Advise Pubhc on Water Use.

I I i i 1P ii h i

l Imtiate Feeld Teshng of initiate Feeld Testing of Initiate F# eld Testing of Water Supphes and Milk Supplies Raw Foods Shen Fishery Areas I 1p Do Emisting or - Do P,ed.cted Love,s of ~O Re.ase ,o E ,st,ng 0, ,,ed ,ed Radeosctivity from this Pathway Release Mita surface Levels of Radioactivdy from This to Market W8 and Other Pathways Eseed Plus Other Pathways Eneed EmergwWim PAGS Em Jrgency Action PAGS for All Nuctedes 8""'[* for All Nuclides

?  ?

1P 1 Do Mace M.m supol.es uride, res E *aa or Pred<ted NO Reiease FES Dept. of Agricumure Levels of Radscactivity from Thes Produce Regulatory Control and Other Pathways Emeed to Market

[ EmergertCy Action PAGS l for All Nuclides 1P 7 1r Issue News Re.ase l and o.s.o Rest,ict us M,lk a,,d ot,ssi.on ..rFoods of su, face Wa,e e, o.fup Puses

,hc and shen F,she,, A,eas 4

A,ra.r.,.,e Pu . Waier ,or A.erreste su.p,y l Inform Pubhc of Water Supply Restrictions l

MAINE Decision Criteria for Recommended Figure 4.4 - 1 Ingestion Pathway Protective Actions _ _.

---

y yw--,-e- - . . , ,,.

g _ . . , , , , _ _ , , _ _ _ _ , , . _ _ __

SECTION 5 O

5.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION 5.1 PUSLIC INFORMATION POLICIES Procedures and policies facilitating easy access and timely dissemination of information must be established and known to all concerned. The following general policies apply, o All news releases addressing State policy decisions as well as releases not of an immediate life-saving nature shall emanate from the Governor's Office or be approved by that office for release, o New Hampshire Yankee will maintain responsibility for the release of information to the news media regarding onsite conditions and other corporate information . Information concerning New Hampshire Yankee employees will be released by the company as it deems appropriate, o The Governor's Director of Communications will be assisted by a Public Affairs Officer in processing all news in a timely and accurate manner. The Public Aff airs Officer will be available to provide information for release at both the State House complex and at the Media Center.

o All organizations with emergency responsibilities,in this plan Hill refrain from making statements to the news media and will direct requests for information to the appropriate Public Affairs Officer located at the State House complex or the Media Center, when established.

5-1 O

o State agencies or individuals who oesire to release any official public information will submit the release to the closest Public V Affairs Officer.

o All information prepared for release must be accompanied by appropriate data documents or other substantiating information as appropriate.

5.1.1 Rumor Control A rumor control telephone number (1-800-452-8735) will be made public in order to respond to public conerns and provide information and emergency instructions.

5.1.2 Brochures Printed information on the effects of radiation and methods for preventing radiological contamination of food products will be distributed to farmers and food processing facilities within the Maine portion of the IPZ by the University G of Maine Cooperative Extension Service, the Maine Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

5.1.3 Radio /TV l

j In the event of an accident at Seabrook Station the Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) would be utilized to provide the public with information and instructions.

EBS messages for the ingestion pathway will be formulated in the State EOC in Augusta and coordinated with other states at the IF0/ EOF. Once the message is prepared it will be reviewed by MECEP and the Governor's representative at the l State EOC before release.

5-2 O

In order to provide an effective, operational, and reliable means to issue emergency instructions to the public and to provide for supplemental alerting of the "special population", WOKQ-FM in Dover, New Hampshire and WGAN-AM/FM in Portland, Maine, will be utilized as Common Program Control Stations (CPSC-1) for the states of New Hampshire and Maine, respectively.

A list of EBS stations in Cumberland and York Counties which can be called upon to provide public notification and information is included as Table 5.1-1.

f Information also will be provided by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency Weather Radio Stations.

1 O

5-3

) .

s k

TABLE 5.1-1 4

STATE OF MAINE EMERGENCY BRGADCAST SYSTEM PARTICIPATING STATIONS CUMBERLAND AND YORK COUNTIES l

i Location Call Frequency EBS Designation Monitorina Assionment Phone i Partland WGAN-FM 102.9 MHz CPCS(State)/ ORIG PRI REL (Natl) WKCG,AUG/WBZ,BOS 797-9330 1 Partland WGAN-AM 560 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 797-9330 i Psrtland WGAN-TV Channel 13 PRI WGAN-FM 797-6480.

! Partland WCSH-TV Channel 6 PRI WGAN-FM 772-0181

! Partland WJBQ-FM 97.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 775-6321 Partland WLOB-AM 1310 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 775-1310 i Pcrtland WMGX-FM 93.1 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 774-4561

Portland WPOR-FM 101.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 772-4248

! Portland WPOR-AM 1490 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 772-4248 I Portland WMEA-FM 90.1 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 866-4493

! Portland / Poland WMTW-TV Channel 8 PRI WGAN-FM 998-4311 Portland / Poland WHOM-FM 94.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 773-0209 G:rham WDCI-AM ~ 1590 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 883-9539 Sinford WNCY-FM 91.1 MHz PRI- WGAN-FM 324-7021 l

Srnford WSME-FM 92.1 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 324-7271 1 WSME-AM 1220 kHz PRI WGAN-FM- 324-2464 l Scarborough WDCS-FM 106.3 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 8G3-9539 l Westbrook WMER-AM 1440 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 775-6321

, Biddeford WBSF-FM 91.7 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 282-1515 l Biddeford WBYC-FM 94.3 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 282-5121 282-5121

~

WIDE-AM 1400 kHz PRI WGAN-FM i Biddeford (Orono) WMEG-TV Channel 26 PRI WGAN-FM 866-4493 l Brunswick WBOR-FM 91.1 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 725-8731 Brunswick WKXA-FM 98.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 725-5507

Brunswick WKXA-AM 900 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 725-5507-Portland WYNZ-FM 100.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 772-9791 Portland WYNZ-AM 970 kHz PRI WGAN-FM 772-9791 Seco WPIG-FM 95.9 MHz PRI WGAN-FM 283-1235 l

A Primary (PRI) station is one that broadcasts or rebroadcasts a common emergency program for direct public reception as well as interstation programming for the duration of the EBS activation.

A Common Program Control Station (CPCS) is a Primary station in an EBS operational area which has communication links with appropriate authorities and is responsible for coordinating the carriage of a common emergency program for its crea.

Source: State of Maine EBS Operational Plan 1 of 1

SECTION 6 6.0 FACILITIES Emergency Response Facilities utilized in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station which has the potential of impacting the State of Maine are described in this section.

6.1 STATE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER The State EOC is located in the State Office Building in Augusta, Maine within the of fice of MECEP. In the event of a Seabrook Station accident, represen-tatives of the State agencies shown in Figure 3.1-1 would proceed to the State EOC.

6.2 YORK COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER b)

D The York County EOC is located in the York County Courthouse in Alfred, Maine.

Personnel from York County response agencies would proceed to the County EOC in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station. The York County EOC will be used as a State Field EOC, and field teams will be dispatched from there.

! 6.3 INCIDENT FIELD OFFICE / EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY l

t The Incident Field Office / Emergency Operations Facility (IF0/ EOF) is located in Newington, New Hampshire. The IF0/ EOF is operated by New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) and will be staffed by representatives from NHY, Federal agencies, and State agencies from New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Maine. The Nuclear Engineering Specialist of DHE and representatives of MECEP and Maine State Police will proceed to the IF0/ EOF in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station which has the potential of impacting the State of Maine.

6-1

b

\*) 6.4 MEDIA CENTER The Media Center is located at the Newington Town Hall in Newington, New Hampshire. This facility is utilized to prepare and distribute news releases and to permit exchanges of information among the designated spokespersons for New Hampshire Yankee, State agencies, and Federal agencies. News releases pre-pared by one of the designated spokespersons will be reviewed with his counter-parts before release to the news media. A Public Affairs Officer from the Governor's Office will proceed to the Media Center in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station.

6.5 PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY The Public Health Laboratory within the Division of Health Engineering, will receive samples of-food, milk, water, vegetation, soil, etc, collected in the field in accordance with the FOG. Samples will be processed in accordance with priorties established by the accident assessment personnel at the IF0/ EOF and the State EOC.

Testing of samples will be performed at the Public Health Laboratory. If the volume of samples exceeds the capacity of the Laboratory, samples will be dispatched to nearby laboratories available through the New England Compact or the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

6-2

SECTION 7 O

7.0 AUTHORITIES Title 25, Section 51 of Maine Public Law authorizes the Governor or his designee to enter into agreements and develop plans to protect the public from hazards or dangers " arising from the peaceful use of nuclear or atomic materials."

Title 25, MRSA Section 50, Radiation Hazards, authorizes and directs the Department of Human Services, which includes the Bureau of Health and its Division of Health Engineering, to advise the Governor on the nature of a radiation incident and to recommend protective action guidelines.

The Radiation Protection Act, Chapter 160, revises and consolidates earlier Maine regulations in the area of radiation. It states the role of State agen-cies, including the Department of Human Services and the Department of Environ-mental Protection, in this area.

O Maine Public Law, Title 37B, Section 783, identifies the need for disaster emergency plans and directs "each municipal, interjurisdictional, county and regional agency, in consultation with the bureau" (CEP) to prepare and keep current a disaster emergency plan. Part 960 defines an " Emergency Planning Zone" as the approximately 10-mile radius around a nuclear power plant for which plans must be prepared to protect the public from the inhalation exposure pathway. This zone is frequently referred to as the Plume Planning Zone in the industry. The Ingestion Planning Zone is defined in Part 960 as being the approximately 50-mile radius around the nuclear plant for which plans must be made to protect the public from radiation by means of the food chain.

The Maine Food Law, Title 22, Chapter 551, states the authority of the Maine Department of Agriculture to sample food (Section 2164), detain, embargo or con-denn food which has been misbranded or adulterated (Section 2159).

7-1

Maine Public Law, Title 12, Sections 701-725, comprise the State of Maine Inlan.1 Fisheries and Wildlife Laws which govern the practices of the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.

Maine Public Law, Title 12, Sections 601-627, compromise the law governing the practices of the Maine Department of Marine Resources.

Copies of pertinant statutes and laws are maintained at the MECEP offices.

4 7-2 l

~-- - - . - - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - __. _

1 SECTION 8 O

8.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT 8.1 PURPOSE This section establishes the arrangements for requesting and effectively uti-lizing resources from other states through the New England Compact on Radiological Health Protection and from the the Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP).

8.2 COORDINATION WITH OTHER STATE AND FEDERAL RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH OFFICIALS

.Other states will be conducting field monitoring and dispersion calculations for i their portions of the IPZ. The IFO/ EOF accident assessment staff will periodi-cally exchange information and jointly review protective action recommedations with the radiological health specialists of these states, i

During the course of an accident, NRC staff may be stationed at the EOF and the EOC. The observations and informat. ion obtained from these Federal officials will be of value to the IF0/ EOF accident assessment staff and the decision makers at the EOC.

Further, during the course of an accident, DHE may have a need to supplement its l .

I resources for accident assessment tasks. Two readily available sources are Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Plan and the New England Compact on Radiological Health Protection. The need for additional support will be coordinated by the DHE representative at the IF0/ EOF with other response organi-zations. Recommendations for assistance must be approved oy the Director of DHE i

8-1 O

o L

..- -.-.. , .,. _.-~. ,-- ._,,.,,. - ,-. -.- -- -.- ,-. -_,. ,.-. --_.- -. -- .-.____-- ----.-

at the EOC and actual requests for assistance will be authorized by the (s Governor's representative at the EOC.

advance to allow for travel delays.

Needs will be determined sufficiently in The needs may be based on anticipated events and a possible accident course that may not occur.

The specific needs for FRERP and Compact resources cannot be determined in advance of an accident and itemized. The State of Maine considers that it has sufficient personnel and equipment to carry out a complete response to most accident scenarios, and to cover the initial response to all accidents.

Instances that may require additional support include the following.

o Accidents taking place over a protracted period may require augmenting monitoring and accident assessment staff to ensure reason-able workloads and a thorough response.

o Accidents that result in establishing large exclusion areas may require special equipment, and personnel with appropriate training, to carry out monitoring and environmental sampling within the area.

O o The contamination of available equipment, or breakdowns of one-of-a-kind items may require securing replacements in order to continue monitoring, environmental sampling activities, and laboratory analy-sis.

o Prolonged exposure of personnel to high levels of radiation may require supplemental personnel for monitoring and environmental sampling activities.

o Recovery and reentry activities in the wake of an accident that pro-duced widespread contamination or a high level of contamination, may require additional personnel and equipment for a prolonged period of monitoring, sampling, and clean-up.

8-2

(~'N Requests for Federal assistance will be coordinated with the state governments of New Hampshire and Massachusetts.

When requests are approved by the Director of DHE, the Governor or his represen-tative will make the request for assistance from the DOE-Brookhaven facility or from FEMA Region I. For Compact-related support, the Director of DHE will complete the activation process specified in the New England Interstate Radiological Assistance Plan. Specific needs will be provided by the Manager, Radiation Control Program, who will also confirm arrival times and arrange for any specific pre-arrival support requested. Specific needs will be described and arrangements for support will be made.

Once the requested support has arrived and/or laboratory facilities have been arranged for, control and coordination of all technical assistance will rest with the Manager, Radiation Control Program. Upon establishment of the Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center, the DHE representative at the IF0/ EOF will communicate with the Federal Offsite Technical Director to obtain radiological monitoring and assessment information. Logistical support will be O provided by MECEP.

8.3 NEW ENGLAND COMPACT The New England Compact on Radiological Health Protection (the Compact) was adopted by the six New England states by means of legislative action and provi-des the means for obtaining assistance from other states. Appendix B provides detailed information about the Compact. The New England Interstate Radiation Assistance Plan, Appendix C, was developed in accordance with Article III of the i Compact.

The Plan outlines the manner in which the interstate mutual aid and assistance, l

and exchange of personnel, will be accomplished. It includes specific infor-nation on the channels of communication among the states, the availability of 8-3

- m --,-,-,,ww -y,.- ,-p.-r------w --row. ,,y 37a-e-c- ----.a w-Cw--yww,----yr----g-v,v---m- ,--h-e -+= - * - - - - -+m

equipment, the laboratory capabilities of the states, the procedures for requesting assistance from the party states, and the notification of party sta-tes of radiological incidents. Also, it provides clarification of the proce-dures for loan of personnel and equipment, and for the coverage of financial obligations resulting from the provision of assistance.

Authority to seek assistance by means of the Compact has been delegated to the Commissioner of Human Services and then to the DHE.

8.4 RESPONSE BY FEDERAL AGENCIES UNDER MASTER PLAN The Federal agencies and the support they may provide are identified in the FRERP 50 FR 46542 (November 8, 1985) and described below (refer to Figure 8.4-1 for organization of Federal support).

8.4.1 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

1. Serves as the primary point of contact for requests for Federal assistance from State and local officials and other Federal agen-l cies.

2. Provides a lead official to coordinate and ensure the provision of appropriate nontechnical assistance, including telecom munications support, requested by Federal, State, and local agencies.

3. Serves as the primary point of contact and coordination between the NRC and other Federal agencies for nontechnical response activities.

4. Coordinates the dissemination of all public information concerning l Federal nontechnical emergency response activities, and ensures that public information releases are coordinated with State / local authorities and the NRC. Establishes an interagency public affairs group.

8-4 O

, - 5. . Develops procedures to facilitate reimbursement of Federal agencies for resources expended in responding to a radiological accident.

6. Reviews and integrates all Federal agency implementation plans to ensure that all required actions and interfaces are adequately addressed.

8.4.2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

1. Coordinates the technical response activities of the licensee, DOE and other Federal agencies.

2. Provides technical advice to State / local agencies.

3. Develops, for State and local agencies, a Federal technical recom-mendation on protective measures which reflects all substantive dissenting views of' other Federal agencies and the licensee.

Participates with the lead FEMA official in discussing Federal O recommendations for protective measures with appropriate State / local officials, except in situations of imminent peril to the public health and safety where the NRC may be required to make l

t direct contact with the appropriate State / local officials

regarding recommendations for protective measures.

l l

4. Ensures that its radiological monitoring activities are coordinated with the Offsite Technical Director of DOE.

5. Coordinates the release of public information concerning the Federal technical response, including the status of the reactor, radiological monitoring activities, and other Federal technical support, and ensures that such releases are coordinated with the State (s), FEMA, and the licensee.

l l

t

6. Assesses the nature and extent of the radiological accident and the potential offsite consequences to the health and safety of the public.

8.4.3 Department of Energy (DOE)

1. Coordinates the of fsite radiological monitoring assessment, eval-untion, and reporting activities of all Federal agencies during the initial phases of an accident, and maintains a technical liaison with State and local agencies with similar responsibilities.

Ensures the orderly transfer of responsibility for coordinating the intermediate and long-term radiological monitoring function to EPA

! after the initial phases of the emergency at a mutually agreeable time.

2. Provides the - personnel, including the Offsite Technical Director, and equipment required to coordinate and perform the offsite radiological monitoring and evaluation activities.

t

3. Assists the NRC in assessing the accident potential and in devel-oping technical recommendations on protective measures.

4. Maintains a common set of all offsite radiological monitoring data

~

and provides these data and interpretation to the NRC and to appropriate State and local agencies requiring direct knowledge of radiological conditions.

5. Provides consultation and support services to all other entities (e.g., private contractors) having radiological monitoring func-tions and capabilities.

8-6 4

i

. -- ~. - .- .- . . -- -.

4 4

l

6. Assists the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other Federal, State, and local agencies by providing technical and medical advice concerning treatment of radiological contamination.

7. Provides telecommunications support -and interface with Nuclear Emergency Search Team capabilities as provided' for by existing NRC/ DOE agreement.

8. Assists other Federal agencies in developing and establishing guidelines on effective systems of emergency radiation detection and measurement, including instrumentation.

9. Reviews and integrates agency radiological monitoring plans into the Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Plan.

, 8.4.4 Department of Agriculture (USDA)

1. Assists the NRC, in coordination with HHS in developing technical recommendations for State and local officials regarding protective measures related to food and animal feed.

2.. Assists State and local officials, in coordination with HHS, on the implementation of protective measures to minimize contamination through food ingestion.

3. Estimates and provides advice to State and local officials on how to minimize losses to . agricultural resources from radiation effects.

4. Monitors emergency production, processing, and distribution of food resources during a radiological accident.

l 8-7 i

i I - . . . . . , , , - , - _ - _ . . . . . _ . _ , , _ - . . . - . _ _ _ . - _ _. - - _ _ - _ . , . . _ , _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ - - - -

5. Ensures the safety and wholesomeness of agricultural products in

) establishments under Federal inspection, and agricultural com-modities and products owned by the Commodity Credit Corporation /USDA.

6. Assists in the provision of food animal feed to replace con-taminated feed and pasture.

7. Provides advice on and assists State / local officials in the dispo-sition of food animals affected by radiation in coordination with the EPA and HHS.

8. Provides a representative to State agricultural ogencies to keep State / local officials informed of Federal efforts. T-t-

9. Provides a representative to HHS to facilitate cooperation between l USDA and HHS. '

i

10. Provides National Radio Fire Cache assistance under provision of l

l NRC/ Forestry Service Agreements.

8.4.5 Department of Commerce (DOC)

1. Estimates the damage to industrial resources and recommends  ?

(  :

measures to deal with problems in the industrial sector, e

l 2. Provides current and forecast meteorological information about wind direction and speed, boundary layer mixing, precipitation, and any other meteorological and hydrological parameters affecting radiolo-

! gical contamination.

l

3. Provides gamma radiation level readings from National Weather Service offices as requested by DOE.

8-8 x-l

- - . + -

+~we , ,,- - g - v y , - . . - . ,,,,,,,w,..--,-p

y. - . . -..

4. Provides a representative to both the onsite and offsite radiologi-

. ('N : cal moriitoring astncies as required (i .e. , DOE and NRC) to coor--

i

(

k ,

dinate meteorological opera

• ions, provYde meteorological . (1 rad , ,

/. hydrological information, ano arrange for supplemental meteorologi-

- (s- q .-

cal reessurements.

( s' s

x i ,

(

.E . ; N 8.4.6 ' Department SfcDefense (D00) ,

• ,,, s s

Provides military assistence in , the form of manpower, technical ,and s' s. /

logistical support, including airMf t services and telecommunications

'~

3 support, hs requested by FEMA. <

q r

s.

.) ( (

', 7 x . ,

, , s t- .;

, . 8.4.7 iDepartadett of Health and Human Services (HHS)  ? \,

(s ,

i:n 'N

. , [ i;

1. Coordinates the Federal health service response / .

j s i ., I t .

v,  %* -

s" s 4 3:

2. 1 Assists the NRC, in coordination with USDA, in developing technical

% '- h}rhommendationsforStateandlocalofficialsregardingprotective i.

, meqsures related to food '

\end' animal feed.

4. - m  :

4 t

3. Provides assistance to State and local golfernment hfficials on the #

x

, .s s bse of prophylact ic drugs to minimize; the radsation doses of Y affected persons.Y "1 i 1:- h

4. Provides advice and guidance to State and local officials in' *

,. , \ assessing the impact of the offsite consequences ofg radiological r ,

}g accidents on the health of ' persons Wt'pe affected areas. ,

,s

• 5 s 'g

" 5. Provides advice to medical care personnel regarding prcper medical o 0 s p,) ,

treatment of people exposed to or contaminated by radioactive l e o .

6- -p material.  ;

,', , _p 9

u, L 3 4

s s

+

t 8-9' l '

O 's , -.

,. s' i t ;t w yb u,; .

s

'A y

<  % s. .

. .-.---,----,.m.-,g -.c., --

. - - - . . - . - - -.--.:e-. .-,%

6. Ensures the capability of Public Health Service Hospitals to respond to radiological accidents.

7. Provides resources, in coordination with the USDA, to ensure that food and animal feeds are safe for consumption.

8.4.8 Department of Transportation (DOT)

1. Coordinates the Federal transportation response in support of transportation plans and actions of State and local authorities.

2. Provides, through Regional Emergency Transportation Coordinators, representation to State and local transportation authorities. _

b

3. Directs air traffic in and around the affected area.

8.4.9 Environmental Protection Agancy (EPA)

O 1. Provides resources including personnel, equipment, and laboratory support to assist DOE in monitoring radioactivity levels in the environment.

2. Assists the NRC, in coordination with HHS, in developing technical recommendations regarding measures to protect the public health and safety.

3. Assumes responsibility from DOE, at a mutually agreeable time, for coordinating the intermediate and long-term radiological monitoring function after,the initial phases of the emergency.

8-10 O

t-

4. Provides guidance to Federal agencies and State and local govern-p ments, in coordination with DOE and HHS, on acceptable emergency levels of radioactivity and radiation in the environnent.

5. Assesses the nature and extent of the environmental radiation hazard.

8.4.10 National Communications System (NCS)

1. Provides and coordinates, in response to a FEMA request, the necessary communications for the Federal Government response in accordance with the National Plan for Communications Support in Emergencies and Major Disasters. Is prepared to provide this sup-port prior to a formal declaration of an emergency or wjor disaster.

2. Provides technical representation to appropriate State agencies to assist in meeting their communications requirements.

O v New Hampshire Yankee will notify Federal agencies of an accident at Seabrook Station. Upon notification, NRC will decide whether or not to activate its organization to support onsite activities. If the o.. .ce organization is acti-vated, NRC will notify FEMA and DOE to prepare to support the affected States under FEMA's coordination.

All requests for Federal assistance to the State of Maine will be authorized by the Governor or his representative. Requests will be made to FEMA Region I for nontechnical support and to DOE-Brookhaven for technical support. In accordance with the FRERP, FEMA will inform other Federal agencies of State needs.

Airports in the vicinity of Seabrook Station which may be utilized by federal agencies are listed in Table 8.4-1.

e-11 O

%s

TABLE 8.4-1 A AIRPORTS IN VICINITY OF SEABROOK STATION IPZ Concord Municipal Airport - Concord, NH

a. Runways:

Three runways - asphalt Runway 3-21 3999 ft long x 150 ft wide Runway 12-30 3499 ft long x 150 ft wide Runway 17-35 6009 ft long x 150 ft wide

b. Instrumentation:

Instrument approach is possible on Runway 17 using:

Visual Omni Range

, Visual Omni Range / Distance Measuring Equipment

c. Mainly for smaller aircraft.

Portland International Jetport - Portland, ME

a. Runways:

Two runways - asphalt Runway 11-29 6800 ft long x 150 ft wide Runway 18-36 5000 ft long x 150 ft wide

b. Instrument approach is possible on Runway 11-29 using:

Instrument Landing System

c. Will accommodate Boeing 727 or comparable aircraft.

Pease Air Force Base - Newinaton, NH (Seabrook Station EPZ Access)

a. Runways:

One runway - asphalt Runway 16-34 11,320 ft long x 300 ft wide

b. Instrumentation:

All instrumentation capabilities are available.

c. Will accommodate any type and size aircraft.

1 of 1

Ill ,

N O

I S A T I T A

O t r

o H

H P

E O

D O

D Z T

N A

G p R p O u T 1

5 S Q R 3 H O l

a A P t c

I M P r i E U a n F S P h E R c S e

t N F

C n O o P 4 N S 4 E

l S C A R a C O D  :

r N D S Y e e U C c d N . n e E e F G r 1 R e

- E f 4 M e E R 8

L E A R R U E G D I E F F N

O A I M T E TA F NN O /

C R

N II OD JR O

O C

i Y

T g I n L .

i I r T A S A C E 0 I L o U P H D O D

O D

0 O D

A t / E H S 0 t C i C U r EI n R o TG o N p EIO M p OSL u I DFO S FI 0D l A a R i

c n

h c

e t T C n I

R I

e l N m a s r T s e N E

e s

d e D s F I A Y C T C C I O

l R A L N I E T T U I

S N

O I ll .lIl!Il

I.

APPENDIX A O GLOSSARY G

Access Control The prevention of unauthorized people from entering a speci-fic area. Road barriers and traffic control may be used to affect access control in the event of an accident at Seabrook Station.

Agricultural Any building or tract of land used to grow crops or raise Facility livestock for production of food storage and food processing operations.

1 ALERT An ALERT is the second lowest level of emergency classifica-tion. Declaration of an ALERT indicates events in progress which involve an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety at the nuclear power plant. Any radioactive release associated with this-level is expected O- to be limited to small fractions of the EPA Protective Action Cuideline exposure levels.

Emergency Network of radio stations which provides direct link between Broadcast responsible public officials and the public. EBS stations System (EBS) broadcast instructions about what steps the public shN1d take.

Emergency The level at which an incident at a nuclear power plant has Classification been classified by the plant operator. The levels, listed in Level increasing severity, are UNUSUAL EVENT, ALERT, SITE AREA EMERGENCY, and GENERAL EMERGENCY.

A-1 O

V

2.

Emergency Locations designated by the State and local Emergency Operations Response Organizations as assembly areas for their respective Centers staffs. These facilities are the central command and control points for their respective Emergency Response Organizations.

i i~

Emergency A center established to coordinate the flow of technical Operations- information from the onsite to the offsite Emergency Response Facility (EOF) Organization. It is in the EOF that accident assessment activities are coordinated among Federal, State, local, and utility personnel. State of Maine officials will be repre-sented at the New Hampshire Yankee EOF in the event of an emergency at Seabrook Station.

Emergency The area covered by the Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

Planning The Ingestion Pathway EPZ is the area contained within.50 Zones (EPZ) miles of the plant. The boundary of the Plume Exposure EPZ is chosen to accommodate practical planning considerations and to conform as closely as possible to a 10-mile radius.

Emergency The combination of Federal, State, local, and private agen-

j. Response cies designed specifically to provide offsite capability to Organization implement emergency responses.

GENERAL The most severe of the Emergency Classifications. It may i EMERGENCY involve substantial degradation or melting of the reactor's radioactive core with potential for loss of containment integrity. Release may exceed the EPA Protective Action Guideline exposure levels beyond the power plant site boundary area.

1 A-2 e

w, -,,--e- ---ca+w ,. r-ve-,-*--we-,w---,www, e'~ , , - , ww,wvy-,,-.-,.v--- 1.m--*-,--.-e..w.e-w,w,-w--3+,---ytw,r...ee..=,,.,,,,,-,v.weeeg.,*-

Incident Field The IFO is the location in close proximity to the Plume O

y /

Office (IFO)- Exposure EPZ at which representatives from the plant and V from Federal, State, and local emergency response organiza-tions will coordinate with each other.

Ingestion The pathway through which persons may take up radioactive Exposure material and receive a radiation dose from internally-Pathway deposited radioactive materials (i.e., from ingestion of con-taminated water, food, or milk).

Media Center The location where news media representatives obtain news information concerning an emergency at a nuclear power plant.

The Public Information Representatives at the Media Center will gather, coordinate, and release information as it becomes available.

Plume An elongated and usually open and mobile mass of material that is dispersing through the atmospnere. In the case of a nuclear power plant, the material consists of radioactive particles and gases.

Plume Exposure The pathway through which persons may be exposed to radioac-Pathway tive material due to (a) whole-body external exposure due to gamma radiation from the plume and from deposited material, and (b) inhalation of radioactive particles or gases such as radioactive iodine, xenon, or krypton from the passing radioactive plume.

Protective Emergency measures to be taken by the public to mitigate the Action consequences of an accident by minimizing the radiological exposures that would likely occur if such actions were not

- undertaken.

A-3 0

N Protective The numerically projected dose level criteria of radiation

. Action which:act as trigger points for initiating protective Guidelines response actions.

Site The property owned by the utility-in the immediate area of the nuclear power plant site.

SITE AREA An incident which involves actual or likely major failures of EMERGENCY plant functions needed for the protection of the public.

Radiological releases, if any, are not expected to exceed the EPA Protective Action Guideline exposure levels except near the site boundary.

UNUSUAL EVENT The least severe of the emergency classifications.

Declaration at this level indicates that an incident which has taken place may lead to a potential degradation of the level of safety at the nuclear power plant.

O C

I A-4 O

t

m A8BREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS i

V B0H (Maine) Bureau of Health CPCS-1 Common Program Control Station - 1 DHS Division of Human Services DOA (Maine) Department of Agriculture DOC (U.S.) Department of Commerce D0D (U.S.) Department of Defense DOE (U.S.) Department of Energy DOT (U.S.) Department of Transportation DEP (Maine) Department of Environmental Protection DHE (Maine) Division of Health Engineering EBS Emergency Broadnst System ECL Emergency Classification Level EOC Emergency Operati'on Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPA (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency EPZ Emergency Planning Zone FDA Food and Drug Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FRERP Federal Radiological Emergency Response Plan FRMAP Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Plan HHS (U.S. Department of) Health and Human Services IFO Incident Field Office MECEP Maine (Bureau vf) Civil Emergency Preparedness NHY New Hampshire Yankee NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (of the U.S.

Department of Commerce)

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PAG Protective Action Guidelines (Promulgated by EPA)

'RERP Radiological Emergency Response Plan A-5

SS Seabrook Station USAF U.S. Air Force l

USCG U.S. Coast Guard '

USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture

)

A-6

- ~ - . - . _ . _ . . , _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . . , - - . . _ _ , - _ . _ . , _ _ __ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ -

APPENDIX A REFERENCES O

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Background for Protective Action Recommendations: Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Food and i Animal Feeds. HHS Publication, FDA 82-8196, August 1982.

2. U.S. Department of Energy. Guidance on Offsite Emergency Radiation Measurement Systems - Phase 2: The Milk Pathway. WINCO-1009, 1984.

3. U.S. Department of Energy. Guidance on Offsite Emergency Radiation l

Measurement Systems - Phase 3: Water and Non-Dairy Food Pathway.

WINCO-1012, 1984.

4. FEMA Guidance Memorandum (Draft) IN-1. The Ingestion Pathway.

5. U.S. Government Printing Of fice. Accidental Radioactive Contamination of l Human Food and Animal Feeds and Recommendations for State and Local l ( Governments. Federal Register 47073-47083, October 22, 1932,

6. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1.

7. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support

-of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants. NOREG-0396/ EPA 520/1-78-016.

8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Reactor Safety Study. WASH 1400. >

9. Environmental Protection Agency. Manual of Protective Action Guides for Nuclear Incidents. EPA 520/1-75-001.

A-7

O APPENDIX B NEW ENGLAND COMPACT APPENDIX II INVENTORY RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT O

O

l RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 1 of 4 -

)

] STATE CONNECTICUT- Date 12/80-l

! L l Radiation Evaluated j Ouentity Type Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave  ;

4- GM Eberline E-530 X i

) a. 4 HP-270 probe 24 K 200 200 i b. 1 HP-260 probe cpm er/hr er/hr t

i 1 GM Eberline E-120 X 50 50 50 ,

j er/hr er/hr er/hr a

! 5 Ion Chamber Victoreen 470A X 1000 1000 1000 't l a. Will also detect R/hr R/hr R/hr high energy alpha.

l i

j 4 GM Baird Atomic 420 X 100 100 100 l mr/hr er/hr ar/hr i

l 1 GM/ Scintillation Eberline RM-19 X X X 1.2 Meg X l a. 1 Eberline SPA-3 scintillation cpm per

• l probe assembly, a 2x2 NaI Xtal ar/hr ,

l Cs-137 l j b. The RM-19 can be used with a GM i j probe and other alpha, beta, gamma probes.

i

! 3 Scintillation Eberline PAC-1 S X 2 Meg .

l AGA cpm ,

l 1 Ion Chamber MDH Industries MDH X 999R 999R l

12

• Dosimeter Bendix CDV-138 X 200 nr X i 12 Dosimeter Landsverk L-50 X 200 or X

i. . . - . . . _-

O O '

l. RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 2 of '4 1

i STATE CONNECTICUT Date 12/80 I (continued)

)'

Radiation Evaluated Quantity Tvoe Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-rav Neutron Microwave 1

9

• Dosimeter Landsverk CDV-730 X 20 R 12 Dosimeter Bendix 622 X 20 R 15

• Dosimeter Landsverk CDV-742 X 200 R i

3 Dosimeter Capintec PHY-SEQ 6 X 500 or 500 nr i

1 Dosimeter Bendix 1200-er X 200 nr 200 nr

! 1 Dosimeter Nuclear Assoc. 050 X 5R 5R 4

4

• Dosimeter Bendix CDV-742 X 200 R 2 Dosimeter Jordan CDV-750 X Charger

, 2 Dosimeter Bendix X i Charger i

• Dosimeter Victoreen CDV-750 X .

Charger 1 Dosimeter Bendix 906-5 X

Charger i 1 Dosimeter Capintec CAT 6 N192 X l Charger I

l

• Additional equipment of this type available j on short notice.

I l l

}

~

~J %j RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 3 cf 4 STATE CONNECTICUT Date 12/80 (continued)

Radiation Evaluated I

Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave 1 RF Narda 8100 X 200 mw/cm2

915 MHz or 2450 MHz 1 RF Narda 8600 X 20 mW/cm2

. a. "E" Field and "H" Field 10 MHz to

b. 8616 metering unit 18 GHz

{

t

, 3 Air Samplers, fixed X X X X i 1 Pressurized Ionization Chamber with X X

! chart recorder and alarm setpoint i ,

j l

i j

k l

1

O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 4 of 4 STATE CONNECTICUT Date 12/80 (continued)

I 1

Radiation Evaluated Quantity Type Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha l Beta l Gamma l X-rav l Neutron l Microwave

! 1 Liquid Scintil- Packard 3003 X 10 cpm

) lation Automatic, Low i Capacity: 200 Samples Energy

! 1 Gamma Spectro- Tracor TN1700 X X j meter System Northern l (Na I) i i 1 Gamma Spectro- Canberra S-80 X X meter System q (Ga-Li) 1 Redon Gas Johnson LLRC-2 X X j Counting System j (Kover Cell) i i 6 6 1 Proportional Beckman Wide X 10 cpm 10 cpm

Counter (PC) Beta II l 6

! 1 Windowless Inter- Tracerleb FC-180 X 10 cpm nel Proportional Counter (IPC) 6 1 Window Type Beta Tracerlab 339 X 10 cpm Counter (Low Skg) l

(LBBC) i

! 1 Beta Counting Eberline E-120 X 50 K X X

! System (Modified cpm i Pancake Probe / Holder)

I i

I i

)

I

e v

a w

o r

)

i c

p* _ M n

o r

t u

e d N e x t

a y u

l a a r v -

E X x

n R R o R 0 0 i a R 0 r 0 0 t m R 9 R 0 h 0 0 a m 9 0 0 / R . 1 1 i a 0 9 1 1 R m R f - -

d G 0 - - - m n R R a 5 R r r x 0 0 i m m R - u m m 0 0 0 -

0 2 O O 5 2 2 0 1 1 a

t e r B 0h

. 0/ x m 0R T o5 m N a r c E h h M p / 0 P l R 0 I A 0, U

Q) 2 x 0

Ee 3 n d Ni l

. Oa e IM i 2

T F Af x x x x x x x x x x f Uo o

,k L i

Ae b 1 Vt a Ea L t

NS O(

I T 8 1 A

I l / Q Q D e A 0 50 0 3 8 2 As As A d 5 0 1 2 0 5 B 3 4 4 e 2 e R o 1 7 77 7 9 8 1 7 s 1 o 0 o M - - 3 - - 5 4 - 2 - - p 8d 8d C V - V 1 0 6 V S - V V i a a A D P D 0 7 - D D D D D h DB DB P C C C 1 5 L C D H C C c U U r

e r

u t s c n l e n k n n c c a e e at e r e e i i f n e ca e e e e w n n u i r ii r v r r o n x x a o o

_ n l o nc o s o o c a i i h s s

_ a r t ho t d t t e m d d s a a M e ic cs H c n c c d l n n r n n b

E V TA es D i a i i a e e e a a a M V L V V R G B B H P P l

l r r r r r R R a e r r s e e e e w t e) e) e b eb b b r r n e l C lpAC o r r m im m m e e i M pA d e e

• a Pa a a s s h mV mV a t t e h h h h n n T y a a B e e p C eC C C e e e S0 S0 m m y i d d . v 2 2 m i i T S n t n n n n n M. r r1 r1 l s s D D D n o uo o o o o u i( i ( i o o L L L Z I CI I I C C G S A A F D D T T T

.,,' y t

i t 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 1 8 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 5 8 8 a 1 u

Q 1 I'  ;'

]' i j' ,; i 1 ,

lll

=

e .

v sl a ia w sn o yo r l i c

at

} i M ni

., ad

, d oa n t ue o ar r a t

u r e oe f r N e d sh e tT t

a y c u a u l r d .

a - o0 v X r0 p0 E 8 D D n .

n L L osA o a L L i eC i m t m R R x x x x x siM sr a a m m ie0 i G fS0 d 1 1 a 5 e8 1

R 6h a t s t x x e e x x x f ooi B t r y e rdS T a ae N h rt e E p x x x x b ch M l iet P A l n I no U aot Q c E ) d h d d l tl e N e e il t wac e 2 O u i I n F ren f

- / T i ern o A t t ao

( U L

n o b u c 2 A c a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ps V ( L mrs ooi E ct N ocI O rea I # E VG ctN T 2 I s s ie A l 5 0 l e e F md3 I e - 7 ke i0 i0 0 B A 4 x D d R - rd 0 r0 r0 0 I I 3 0 K c3 A o L D ao 0 e0 e1 1 S C C 4 8i pe R M T U MM 7 S8 S8 8 D P P 2 noh acT s

s s s so r t t t ar .

e n n n ht s r c c e e e cr u e i i a a a a a m m m a ree t n n n n r r r r w w r ro re re re r ept c i o o a r r r r a a r ag ar ar ar r ssn y

a l s s m e e e e h h e ea eu eu eu e l rr i

f r a a k b b b b s s b l c l s l s l s b aop u e n n c n n n n r r n ci ca ca ca n n b a a e a a a a a a a uh ue ue ue a nt Aay a E P P B C C C C H H C NC NM NM NM C l p M ll o l l eic e e ntd nnr r n n

) o . n n aia 1 t t a a r l l l hch

( a n h h e a a a cs r r r i C C ) t n n n a i 2 e e b c )  % n o o o t tn d d i S 0 0  % 0 u i i i e l od ucn a a l 0 0 5 2 I I n o t r tr t r Br e e e a d 0 0 ( ( a a o C re re re /e Mia p R R C i 8 1 N N c ot ot ot at l y u i i i a pn pn pn hn 0ie T D D D q A A L L 3 4 l t ou ou ou pu 0Sl L L L i H H e e x x i e ro ro ro l o 0 b T T T L P P G G 3 4 S B PC PC PC AC 8da nl sai e a

( w t y ii v rL a i ee t  : SGs n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E a

1 1 1 1 1 1 T e e 'A u O hhC Q N TTM l ll l(l l

O t O

, RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 1 of 3 STATE MASSACHUSETTS Date 12/28/82 Rev. 1 i

! Radiation Evaluated i Quantity Type Manufacturer Model s Lab. Field Alpha l Beta l Gamma l X-ray l Neutron l Microwave r B l 1 Windowless Gas Nuclear 1 X X X Flow Propor- Measurements tional Counter Corp.  !

{

} B

] 1 Thin Window Nuclear Chicago X X X 1 Gas-Flow Pro- Spectro Shield j portional i Counter 1 B 1 Liquid Scin- Packard 3300 X X i tillation j Counter B

1 GeLi MCA Sys- Canberra 3100 X X i ten w/DEC 1104 i

2 2 TLD Reader Victoreen 2600 X X 1 181 CaF2 (Mn) Victoreen 2600-2 X X Vacuum Tube

{ Dosimeters

) 1 Furnace Thermolyne Type X l 10500 1AC L B Beta Tracerlab X X System 1AC Proportaional NMC PCC11A X X X Counter i

i

O O O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 2 of 3 STATE MASSACHUSETTS Date 12/28/82 (continued) Rev. 1 Radiation Evaluated Quantity Type Manufacturer F.. 's Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave j 2 Regulated Air Eberline RAS 1 X

! Samplers 1

2 Pulse Rate Eberline PRd6 4 Meters with H210 Probe Eberline HP210 X 5x105 5x105 cpm cpm 1 Gamma Detector Victoreen 498 X 10R/hr 10R/hr

]

2 Alpha Meter Eberline PAC 1 SAG X 2m cpm j 2R/hr l

! 9 Gamma Detector Precision Drill X 20mR/hr

} Radiation Hole Instrument i 1 Survey Meter Ludlum 3 X l

2 Probe Ludlum 44-3 X 0-200 mR/hr low energy gamma probe l I I

2 Probe Ludlum 44-2 X 0-200 mR/hr high energy gamma probe 1 Gamma Detector Eberline E-120 X 50mR/hr 2 Juno Model 7 X 1mr/hr= 25R/hr 25R/hr 1000 dpa ,

j alpha 1 Jordan Model AGB-10k X 10kR/hr 1

O O O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 3 of 3 STATE MASSACHUSETTS Date 12/28/82 (continued) Rev. 1 1

Radiation Evaluated Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave

$ 1 Victoreen Model 444 X 1000R/hr i

i 1 Ion Chamber Victoreen 440 X 300mR/hr 10 GM Victoreen CDV-770 X 50mR/hr 50mR/hr i

10 Ion Chamber Victoreen CbV-715 X 500R/hr IG Alpha Meter Victoreen CDV-700 X 50mR/hr l 5 Ion Chamber Mud X 12R/hr i ~

d 5 Cutie Pie Victoreen X 10kR/hr 10kR/hr l

2 10 Dosimeter IEHC Sb X Charger 50 Dosimeter Landsverk CDV-742 X 200mR I

i 20 Dosimeter Landsverk X 1R 1 RM Meter Narda H616 X 10,000 Mw/cm2 i

i r

t j LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPABILITY Page 1 of 1 STATE MASSACHUSETTS Dato 12/28/82 Rev 1 i

! Analyses Per Day I Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency

', Medium Analysis (hrs) 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 5

i i

k i

NOTE: THE ITEMS ON THE INVENTORY WITH SUPERSCRIPT "8" ARE INSTALLED AT THE STATE LAer.mATORIES

. INSTITUTE BUILDING, JAMAICA PLAIN, MASSACHUSETTS. EACH PIECE OF EQUIPMENT IS READY FOR CALIBRATION. THIS EQUIPMENT IS SCHEDULED TO BE OPERATIONAL IN JANUARY, 1983.

f i

i i

e 1

1 I

i j

I

- s i

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 1 of 3 STATE NEW HAMPSHIRE Date 11/07/85 Rev. 3 1

i j Radiation Evaluated j Ouantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha l Beta l Gamma l X-rav l Neutron l Microwave

) 1 Proportional Tennelec LB-1000 X 10 cpm 10 cpm

{

counter j 8 8 j

1 TLD Reader Victoseen 2810 X 6x10 R 6x10 R 1 MCA [Ge(Li)] Nuclear Data 6620 X N/A i

1 Ion Chamber Victoreen 592B X 1R 1R 3 GM Eberline E-510 X 200 200 200 t ar/hr ar/hr ar/hr i

3 GM Various Makes COV-700 X 50er/hr 50er/hr l

1 GM Wm. B. GP-200 X 20er/hr 20er/hr j Johnson i 6

] 2 Scintillation Eberline PAC-15A X 2x10 cpm l

6 1 Scintillation Ebelrine SPA-1 X 2x10 1

cpm 2 i

Mw/cm 1 Scintillation Eberline X 200er/hr 5

l 1 Proportional Eberline PAC-3G X 10 cpm i Counter

! 4 j 1 Scintillation Wm. B. BSP-2A X 5x10 l Johnson cpm

} l l

l O

l RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 2 of 3

)

! STATE NEW HAMPSHIRE Date 11/07/86 l (continued) Rev. 3

Rev. 1 J

i i Radiation Evaluated

$ Ouantity Type Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave 1

! 2 Pressurized Nuclear X 300uR/hr f Ion Chashers Measurement 4

Lab.

]

I 4

1 Scintillation Wm. B. FNSP-2A X 5x10 l Johnson cpm 1 Ion Chamber Victoreen 70 X (

i (0.25 R - 100 R 2 Ion Chamber Victoreen 570 X (

! 1 Power Density Narda 8100 X 20aW/cm2 i

j 63 Dosimeter Various Makes CDV-138 X 200 nr

! 1 Ion Chamber MOH 1015 X 999 R 1 Air Sampler MGD Pneu- 41-3202- X 66 m3/ 66 m3/

matics Inc. 5-768 hr hr 1 Liquid Scin- NEI LSC-2 X 106 i tillation

] Counter Mw/cm?

O O O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 3 of 3 STATE NEW HAMPSHIRE Date 11/07/85 (continued) Rev. 3 t Rev. 1 Radiation Evaluated I

Qu ntity Type Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave l

'l 3 Ion Chamber Eberline PIC-6A X 1000R/hr 1000R/hr 5

3 G-M Ratemeter Eberline RM-14 X 5x10 3 Air Sampler Radeco H-809C X (2.5 cfa) 7 Micro-R Meter Ludlum 19 X 5 mR/hr

2 G-M Ludlum 5 X 2 R/hr I

5 1 G-M Ludlum 2000 + X 5x10 Atlantic Nuclear G-M l

i i

l 4

1 I

i

O O O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 1 of 4 STATE RHODE ISLANO Date 12/28/82 Rev. 2 Radiation Evaluated Quantity Type Manufacturer Model 8 Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-rav Neutron Microwave 1 Scintillation Ludlum 60 X 5x106 Counter cpm i 1 Beta Survey Nuclear 2650 X 100

(not GM) Chicago mR/hr I 1

f 1 Gamma Survey Victoreen 470A X 1 R/hr ,

j 1000R/hr

1 (8) Geiger Counter Ludlum 3 200mR/hr

) X 5 '

i 3x10 cpa 1 Micro-R Meter Ludlum 12 S X 3 mR/hr 1 Geiger Counter Ludlum 2 X 50mR/hr 50mR/hr 1 (1) GM Eberline E-120 X 50mR/hr 50mR/hr 1 GM (thin wall) Victoreen CDV-700 X 50mR/hr 50mR/hr 2 Ion Chamber Victoreen COV-715 X 500R/hr 2 (2) Condenser R Victoreen 570 X (2)

Meter 3 RAD TAD Eberline RT-1A X X X 6 Dosimeter Bendix CDV-742 X 200er X 1 Dosimeter Capintec PHY-SEQ 6 X 2R X

i l.

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 2 of 4 I STATE RHODE ISLAND Date 12/28/82 (continued)

Rev. 3

) Radiation Evaluated

! Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave 1 Dosimeter Capintec PHY-SEQ 6 X 200 mR X 1 Dosimeter Landsverk L-50 X 200 mR X 1 Dosimeter Nuclear Asso. 012 X 1.2 R X i 2 Dosimeter Nuclear Asso. 050 X 5R X j 1 Dosimeter Dosimeter 1200 X 200 mR X j Corp.

i j 1 Dosimeter Dosimeter 002 X 200 mR X i Corp.

i i 1 Proportional NMC Corp. PCC 11T/ X X X Counter DS-1T 1 Low Background Tracerlab OMNI- X X

Beta System Guard 1 NaI/MCA (3) TMC 400 X X System Channel i

3 (4) Ion Chamber MDH 1015 X 999 R 999 R

! 1 (5) Ion Chamber Victoreen 440RFC X X 1R/hr l

l I

O O O 4

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 3 of 4 i

STATE RHODE ISLAND Date 12/28/82 (continued)

Rev. 3 Radiation Evaluated Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Fiela, Alpha l Beta Gamma l X-ray l Neutron l Microwave

. l. . . .

I 1 I I I I I l i 2l 1 (S) Power Density NARDA 8100 X 20mW/cm2 200mW/4m 1 Power Density NARDA 8bl6 X (915 &

2450 MHz only) 2 1 Power Density Holaday 1500 X 100aW/cm i

(2450 MHz) i 2 l 1 (7) Probe NARDA 8633 X 100mW/cm 10 MHz-j 300 MHz l

2

1 (7) Probe NARDA 8623 X 100mW/cm 300 MHz-26 GHz a

i

O O O RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 4 of 4 j STATE RHODE ISLAND Date 12/16/82 (continued)

.Rev. 3 I

j MOTES and/or COMMENTS:

i 5 1) Calibrated with both geiger and HP-270 probes.

2) One unit has 2.5R, SR, 10R, and 25R chambers. The other unit has 2.5R and 25R chambers.

3) System has 3 x 3 NaI coupled to 400 channel MCA. Output is channel by channel teletype or X-Y plot.

4) 10 x 5-6 and 10 x 5-180 probes on 2 units; 10 x 5-6 probe only on 1 unit.

5) RF shielded for CRT and TV measurements. This unit is on loan from BRH.

l

6) One unit with two probes. This unit is on loan from BRH.

l 7) Probe is for use with NARDA Model 8616 meter.

8 i

8) Unit is calibrated for Ludlum Model 44-3 (low energy) Probe, although it will detect other gammas, i

i i

l l

I i

I i

! O O O I

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 1 of- 2 j STATE VERMGHT Date 12/28/82

Rev. 2 l Radiation Evaluated j Ouantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha ,1 Beta l Gamma l X-rav l Neutron l Microwave i i l l I I I i 5 1 1 8F3 Eberline PNC-4 X 5x10 cpa I

l 2 Ion Chamber Victoreen 570 X 0.25 R 0.25 R l

to 100R to 100R 1 Ion Chamber M.H.O. 1015 X 999 R 999 R

! 2 Pressurized Reuter-Stokes RSS-111 X 500 500 l Ion Chamber uR/hr uR/hr 4 4 4 l 1 GM Eberline E-120 X 5x10 5x10 5x10 cpm cpm cpm f

l 3 Ion Chamber Victoreen 471 X 300R/hr 300R/hr j (<1mR ,to 300mR i,ntegrate) 5 5 i 2 GM Eberline PRM-4A X 2x10 2x10 Cpm Cpia

! 5 5 l 1 GM to Scin- Victoreen Thyac III X 8x10 8x10 l tillation NaI cpm cpm

5 1 Silicon Merac IV X 1x10 i Barrier counts I 6 1 1 Scintillation Ebelrine PAC-15AG X 2x10 2 R/hr cpm 1 Diode Holiday HI-1500 X 100aW/cm2 (2.54 GHz) f

1. . . .

I

( L t

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 2 of 2 STATE VERMONT Date 12/28/82 (continued) Rev. 2 f

i 4 Radiation Evaluated j Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-rav Neutron Microwave 1 Diode Holiday 3002 X E-probe: 0.5 MHz to 6 CHz, 7 2 2

10 V /M FS.

l H-probe: SMHz to 300 MHz,

.l 2 2 3 100 A /M FS.

! 1 Diode Narda 8616 X 10 KHz t,o 220 MHz, 300 V/M 2

Probe Narda 8621 X 20mW/cm j 300 MHz-26 OHz 4 Ion Chamber Victoreen V715 X 500 R/hr

! 5 l

2 GM Victoreen V700 X 3x10 50mR/hr i cpm i i i l I i I 3 3 j 1 Ion Chamber Nuclear Asso. Strad X 10 R/hr 10 R/hr l

j 1 Quartz Fiber DCA 015 X 1.5 R 1.5 R

) 1 Quartz Fiber DCA 050 X 5.0 R 5.0 R '

l 3 Quartz Fiber Capintec SEQ-6 X 0.5 R 0.5 R l 3 3 j 2 TLD Reader Victoreen 2810 X 10 R 10 R

! 7 7

1 Gas Flow NMC PCC-11T X 5x10 5x10 Proportional & DS-1T cpm cpm Counter i

i

O O O 4

RADIATION EVALUATION EQUIPMENT Page 3 of 3 l STATE VcRMONT Date 12/28/82

(continued) Rev. 2 j

] Radiation Evaluated l Quantity Type Manufacturer Model # Lab. Field Alpha Beta Gamma X-ray Neutron Microwave

-l 4

1 100 age /cm8 Canberra 220S X Window Gas Flow Counter 1 Ge-Li Gamma Canberra Series 80 X l Spectrometer Mod. 8623 1

1 Liquid Packard X Scintillation i

i j

4

.)

}

l 1

4 i

i f

(

J t

f 1

i i

l i l l

l 1

1 1

' APPENDIX B i

l NEW ENGLAND CONPACT APPENDIX III J

i

-i INVENTORY

OF 1

4

! LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPABILITY }

i U

f l i

i i

4 l v t

i l

i I

i t i i

! 6 i

i I

I l

l i

I I

t k

I B

1

rh s

\s. (v b i

l LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPAEILITY Page 1 of 1 STATE CONNECTICUT Date 12/80 l

Analyses Per Day l Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency Medium Analysis (hrs) 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day Milk or Vegeta- Gamma Scan 1.7 - Normal (100 3+/-1 9+/-2

tion or Water min. count)

.5 - Emergency 32 96 (10 min.

count)

.i

., Water or Gross Alpha 2 (100 ml) N/A N/A 4 12 j Frecipitation Gross Beta 3.5 (1 liter) 2 6 1.75 (.25 1 emer.) 5 20 H-3 5 3 17 4 (emergency) 5 20 l Air Filters Gross Alpha .25 (emergency) 32 96 i

1 1

i a

4 1

I a

I

o ,- s d

4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPA8ILITY (State of Meine) i i

Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency i Medium Analysis (hrs.) 8-hr day 24-hr day 8-hr day 24-hr day i Milk or Gamma Scan 1.67-Normal (100 4 12 j vegetation or min. count)

, water .33-Emergency (20 24 72 min. count)

Water or Gross Alpha 4 - Normal (1 1) 2 6 l

1 precipitation Gross Beta 1.75-Emergency 30 120 lt (25 1) i Water or H-3 1.5 - Normal 5 15 precipitation .5-Emeroency 16 48 1 Air filter or Gross Alpha 1.67-Normal 5 15 l dry desposition Gross Beta .23 Esaraency 24 72 i

} TLD Chip External Gamma 200 600 200 600 i

i I

I TOTES:

}

g Assumption is made that contaminated samples will not need as long a counting time as under normal, non-emergency con-j ditions.

i

Tctal sample capability for gross alpha and gross beta is included under water or precipitation.

i l

1 4

i 1 of 1 5

1

!I

LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPA8ILITY Page 1 of 1 STATE NASSACHUSETTS Date 09/15/80 Analyses Per Day Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency Nedium Analysis (hrs) 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> dag 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> dsv 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day NOTE: THE MASSACHUSETTS RADIATION LABORATORY IS PRESENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF BEING TRANSFERRED FRON THE DEPT. OF ENVIRONNENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING TO THE DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND IS BEING PHYSICALLY RELOCATED FRON LAWRENCE TO JANAICA PLAIN. WHEN THESE CHANGES ARE CONPLETED, AN UPDATED " LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPABILITY" SHEET WILL BE PREPARED.

O i

LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPASILITY (5) Page 1 of 1

, STATE NEW HAMPSHIRE Date 11/07/85 Rev.  ?

I i

j Analyses Per Day

Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency 1 Medium Analysis (hrs) 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day

]

I i Milk, Water or Gamma scan 4.0 2 5 2 5 j Vegetation I Mater or Pre- Gross Alpha 0.7 2 (3) 8 (3) 6 (3) 24 (3) j cipitation(2) & Gross Beta I

Water or Tritium (H-3) 3.0 1 3 2 .8 I Precipitation Air Filter or Gross Alpha 0.7 4 11 11 34 Dry Deposition (2) & Gross Seta TLD (bulb or External Gamma 0.1 27 80 80 240 chip) i (1) This schedule can be maintained for a relatively short period of time (e.g., 1-5 days).

! (2) Instrumentation not available to do both analyres simultaneously.

l (3) Preparation time included.

l (4) This presupposes the availability of personnel, j (5) For any other NERHC members.

O f O.

O d V l LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPABILITY (1)(2) Page 1 of 1 STATE RHODE ISLAND Date 09/09/80 1

I Analyses Per Day

.l Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency l

Medium Analysis (hrs)

{ 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day No " Wet Chem- Gross Alpha 5 (3) 10 I intry" capa-j bility in the Gross Beta 10 (3) 20

! laboratyr.

Gamma Spectra 2-3 (3) 5-6 i

i

}

1 a

l J

J l,

1 4

j (1) The Rhode Island Radiation Program has no direct control over the state laboratory doing the analysis. Any assistance would have to be negotiated on a case-by-case basis depending on work load in the lab at that time.

(2) The estimate of total samples per working day was provided by the laboratory supervisor.

1 (3) Represents an approximate 50-50 split between extended in-state and emergency out-of-state sampling.

4 i

O O LABORATORY ANALYSIS CAPA8ILITY Page 1 of 1 STATE VERMONT Date 10/01/80 Analyses Per Day Analysis Time State Involved in Emergency State Not Involved in Emergency Media Analysis (hrs) 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> day 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> day Air Filter Gross Alpha /Seta 0.5 5 20 10 20 Water Gross Alpha / Beta 8.0 5 5 5 10 Tritium 4.0 5 20 10 20 Gamma Scan 2.0 2 4 3 6 Milk Gamma Scan 2.0 2 4 3 6 Vegetation, Fish, Gamma Scan 8.0 1 2 2 4 Earth, etc.

TLD Road out Dose 0.1 25 50 50 100 (1) Sample preparation time included in all time estimates.

(2) One-person lab staff assumed for all time estimatu.

(3) Analyses estimate times are mutually exclusive; i.e., not all analyses can be done simultaneously but each can be accomplished. .

r -sJ. u - - - m. .a ,

- - , __. u l

l l

APFENDIX B NEW ENGLAND COMPACT APPENDIX IV RADIOLOGICAL INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM i

l l

l l

i l

APPENDIX IV O The purpose of Appendix IV is to provide a uniform system to be used to request assistance and exchange of data during radiological incidents occurring in the New England Compact states.

NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1 was used as the reference document to construct the stan-dard forms in order to accommodate the manner in which information will be available at the site of a radiological incident occurring at a nuclear power facility.

A complete set of forms and instructions has been included in this Appendix.

However, a brief summary of the intended use of these forms follows.

Form RIA-4 is used to request aid or assistance from any of the other members of the Compact. It is not necessary to use this form to request assistance.

However, all of the information required by RIA-4 should be contained in a request for assistance.

O V Form RIA-1 is used to notify other members of the Compact of a radiological incident in progress. The notice can be used, in conjunction with RIA-4, to request assistance (item 7A/B) or to inform the other states.

Form RIA-2 is used to report meteorological and/or release data at the site of a radiological incident. This form should also be used to update meteorological data as new information becomes available.

Form RIA-3 is used to report sampling and/or monitoring data collected at the l

site of a radiological incident. This data should be updated as necessary.

i 10/80 O

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR NEW ENSUWO COMPACT F0lut RIA-1 E ge_g 1, 1, and I are self-explanatory.

Item di a. Should indicate the r(actor site involved. If there is more than one reactor at the site, the problem reactor should be identified (e.g.,

Millstone #2).

If the incident is a transportation accident, a quick geographic description should be given (i.e., Newton, MA, at the intersection of Route 128 and Mass.

Pike).

l 1

If the incident is at some other nuclear facility such as a reprocessing plant or navy yard, the geographic location and site name should be given with a short description of the problem entered in #10 (commentz).

b. Enter the date and time the incident was initiated or reported.

Item 5: Items A, B, C and D are defined in NUREG-0654 and the degree of the c.,mergency should be identified by the reactor when the information is made available to the State Radiation Control Agency. Circle whichever letter applies.

Item E should be circled for an accident involving transportation of radioactive materials.

Item F should be circled for any other type of incident such as a navy yard or reprocessing plant. Any additional data should be entered in #10 (comments).

l

\

i 10/80 t i

i

'O i

Item 6: NUREG-0654 defines several example initiating conditions for each of the emergency categories specified in Items 4A, B, C and D. Each of these con-ditions is identified by number, and this number or numbers should be entered on this line. If more space is needed, use Item #10 (comments). These conditions and numbers are reproduced in Appendix 1 to this instruction sheet. N8: The numerical code which identifies the problem should be provided by the nuclear plant. If it is not furnished, ask for it before hanging up.

Items 7 and 8: If you are requesting assistance, circle 7A and circle the agency (s) that you are requesting assistance from in Item 8.

j If the data is for information only (i.e., no assistance needed now but may need q

help later), circle 78 and make no entry in Item 8.

If some other agency assistance or only a specific type of assistance is needed, I

circle Item 80 and explain in Item #10 (comments).

Item 9

Self-explanatory; if the answer is yes, then Item #10 (comments) should have a statement to the ef fect that New England Compact form (s) will follow immediately.

Item 10: Enter any additional information not covered in previous items, but keep it brief and to the pointill l

l 1

i i

l i

r l

j 10/80 l

lO 1

APPENDIX 1 TO INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR FORN RIA-1 EXANPLE INITIATING CONDITIONS: NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT 4

1. ECCS initiated.

2. Radiological effluent technical specification limits exceeded.

3. Fuel damage indication. Examples:

a. High offgas at BWR air ejector monitor (greater than 500,000 uci/sec; corresponding to 16 isotopes decayed to 30 minutes; or an increase of 100,000 uci/sec within a 30-minute time period).

b. High coolant activity sample (e.g., exceeding coolant technical speci-fications for iodine spike).

c. Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 0.1% equiva-j lent fuel failures within 30 minutes.

4. Abnormal coolant temperature and/or pressure or abnormal fuel temperatures.

5. Exceeding either primary / secondary leak rate technical specification or primary system leak rate technical specification.

6. Failure of a safety or relief valve to close.

7. Loss of offsite power or loss of onsite AC power capability.

8. Loss of containment integrity requiring shutdown by technical specifications.

10/80 O

9. Loss of engineered safety feature or fire protection system function requiring shutdown by technical specifications (e.g., because of malfunc-tion, personnel error, or procedural inadequacy).

10. Fire lasting more than 10 minutes.

11. Indications or alarms on process or effluent parameters not functional in control room to an extent requiring plant shutdown or other significant loss of assessment or communication capability (e.g., plant computer, all meteorological instrumentation).

12. Security threat or 1ttempted entry or attempted subotage.

13. Natural phenomenon being experienced or projected beyond usual levels:

a. any earthquake

, b. 50-year flood or low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche

c. any tornado near site

d. any hurricane

14. Other hazards being experienced or projected:

a. aircraft crash onsite or unusual aircraft activity over facility

b. train derailment onsite

c. near or onsite explosion i

d. near or onsite toxic or flammable gas release

e. turbine failure 10/80 O

15. Other plant conditions exist tnat warrant increased awareness on the part of state and/or local offsite authorities or require plant shutdown under technical specification requirements or involve other than normal controlled shutdown (e.g., cooldown rate exceeding technical specification limits, pipe cracking found during operation).

16. Transportation of contaminated injured individual from site to offsite hospital.

17. Rapid depressurization of PWR secondary side.

O i

ll 10/80 l

0 i

_ - - . - . , _ _ . - - _ _ . . _ , . _ - _ _ . _ . . _ - . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . - . _ , , _ . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ____ .._ ,,__,

EXAMPLE INITIATING CONDITIONS: ALERT O 1. Severe loss of fuel cladding.

l

a. High offges at SWR eir ejector monitor (greater than 5 ci/ sect corresponding to 16 isotopes decayed 30 minutes). l

b. Very high coolant activity sample (e.g., 300 uci/cc equivalent of  ;

I-131).

c. Failed fuel monitor (PWR) indicates increase greater than 1% fuel ,

failures within 30 minutes or 5% total fuel failures. [

l

2. Rapid gross failure of one steam generator tube with loss of offsite power.

3. Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes (e.g., several hundred  !

gpa primary to secondary leak rate). l

4. Steam line break with significant (e.g., greater than 10 gpe) primary to secondary leak rate or MSIV malfunction.

P

5. Primary coolant leak rate greater tnan 50 gps.  !

6. High radiation levels or high airborne contamination which indicates a f severe degradation in the control of radioactive materials (e.g., increase  !

I of factor of 1000 in direct radiation readings). i

7. Loss of offsite power gng loss of all onsite AC power.

8. Loss of all onsite DC power.  !

I i

) l i

i 10/80 j lO i

I  !

i  !

1

9. Coolant pump seizure leading to fuel failure.

\ ]

10. Loss of functions needed for plant cold shutdown.

11. Failure of the reactor protection system to initiate and complete a scram which brings the reactor suberitical.

12. Fuel damage accident with release of radioactivity to containment or fuel handling building.

13. Fire potentially affecting safety systems.

14. All alarms (annunciators) lost.

15. Radiological effluents greater than 10 times technical specification instantaneous limits (an instantaneous rate which, if continued over 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, would result in about 1 mr at the site boundary under average

meteorological conditions).

16 Ongoing security compromise.

17. Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected:

a. earthquake greater than OBE levels i b. flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche near design levels I c. any tornado striking facility

d. hurricane winds near design basis level i

i i

l i

i 10/80 (

i

,- - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ , _ . , _ _ _ . . _ ~ _ . _ , _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . , _ . , _ _ . . _ _ _ .

18. Other hazards being experienced or projected:

a. aircraft crash on facility

b. missile impacts from whatever source on facility

c. known explosion damage to facility affecting plant operation

d. entry into facility environs of toxic or flammable gases

e. turbine failure causing casing penetration

19. Other plant conditions exist that warrant precautionary activation of tech-nical support center and near-site emergency operations center.

20. Evacuation of control room anticipated or required with control of shutdown systems established from local station.

O 10/80 0

EXAMPLE INITIATING CON 0!TIONS: SITE ENER0ENCY v 1. Known loss of coolant accident greater than makeup pump capacity.

2. Degraded core with possible loss of coolable geometry (indicators should include instrumentation to detect inadequate core cooling, coolant acti-vity, and/or containment radioactivity levels).

3. Rapid failure of more than 10 steam generator tubes with loss of offsite power.

4. BWR steam line break outside containment without isolation.

5. PWR steam line break with greater than 50 gpa primary to secondary leakage and indication of fuel damage.

6. Loss of offsite power and loss of onsite AC power for more than 15 minutes.

7. Loss of all vital onsite DC power for more than 15 minutes.

8. Loss of functions needed for plant hot shutdown.

9. Major damage to spent fuel in containment or fuel handling building (e.g.,

large object damage fuel or water loss below fuel level).

l 10. Fire affecting safety ssstems.

l

11. All alarms (annunciators) lost for more than 15 minutes and plant is not in l

[ cold shutdown or plant transient initiated while all alarms lost.

i l

l i

l -

-to- 10/so iO I

t

12. a. Effluent monitors detect levels corresponding to greater than 50 mr/hr for % hour o_r_ greater than 500 nr/hr W.B. for two minutes (or five times chose levels to the thyroid) at the site boundary for adverse meteoroloav.

b. These dose rates are projected based on other plant parameter.s (e.g.,

radiation level in containment with leak rate appropriate fcr existing containment pressure) or are measured in the environs.

13. Imminent loss of physical control of the plant.

14. Severe natural phenomena being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdown.

a. earthquake greater than SSE levels

b. flood, low water, tsunami, hurricane surge, seiche greater than design levels or failure of protection of vital equipment at lower levels

c. winds in excess of design levels

15. Other hazards being experienced or projected with plant not in cold shutdowns

a. aircraft crash affecting vital structures by impact or fire

b. severe damage to safe shutdown equipment from missile or explosion

c. entry to toxic or flammable gases into vital areas

16. Other plant conditions exist that warrant activation of emergency centers and monitoring teams and a precautionary public notification.

17. Evacuation of control room and control of shutdown systems not established from local stations in 15 minutes.

l l

10/80 0

EXAMPLE INITIATING CONDITIONS: GENERAL EMERGENCY O

V

1. a. Effluent monitors detect levels corresponding to 1 rea/hr W.B. or 5 res/hr thyroid at the site boundary under actual metercoloaical conditions.

b. These dose rates are projected based on other plant parameters (e.g.,

radiation levels in containment with leak rate appropriate for existing

-containment pressure with some confirmation from effluent monitors) or are measured in the environs.

NOTE: Consider evacuation only within about 2 miles of the site boundary unless these levels are exceeded by a factor of 10 or projected to continue for 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />.

2. Loss of 2 or 3 fission product barriers with a potential loss of 3rd barrier (e.g., loss of core geometry and primary coolant boundary and high potential for loss of containment).

NOTE: Consider 2-mile precautionary evacuation. If more than gap activity released, extend this to 5 miles downwind.

3. Loss of physical control of the facility.

NOTE: Consider 2-mile precautionary evacuation.

4. Other plant conditions exist, from whatever source, that make release of large amounts of radioactivity in a short time period possible, e.g., any core melt situation. See the specific PWR and BWR sequences.

10/80

NOTFSr a. For sequences where significant releases are not yet taking place and large amounts of fission products are not yet in the i'

containment atmosphere, consider 2-mile precautionary evacus-tion. Consider- 5-mile downwind evacuation (45' to 90* sector) if large amounts of fission products are in the containment atmosphere. Recommend sheltering -in other parts of the plume exposure Emergency Planning Zone under this circumstance.

b. For sequences where significant releases are not yet taking place and containment f ailure leading to a direct atmospheric release is likely in the sequence, but not imminent, and large amounts of fission procucts, in addition to noble gas, are in i the containment atmosphere, consider precautionary evacuation to 5 miles and 10 miles downwind evacuation (45' to 90* sector).

c. For sequence where large amounts of fission products other noble gases are in the containment atmosphere and containment failure i is judged imminent, recommend shelter for those areas where eva-cuation cannot be completed before transport of activity to that location.

d. As release information becomes available, adjust these actions in accordance with dose projections, time available to evacuate, and estimated evacuation times given current conditions.

l 10/80 i

O

4 O J 't E. u Co,N.ACT RADIOLOGICAL INDICENT ADVISORY

1. Information received by: 2. Information sent by:

e Agency: Agency:

Date: Time: Date:

For TWX: Send to: FDA - Region I, Boston, MA 3. Phone (include area code):

ATTN

BRH Representative

4. Incident Site: a. 7. a. Request assistance (indicate agency (s) in 88)

Date: b. Time: c. b. Information only

5. a. Notification of Unusual Event 8. Indicate agency (s) that you are requesting assistance ,

l from:

i b. Alert c. Site Emergency a. Connecticut c. Massachusetts e. Rhode Island 1

l d. General Emergency e. Transportation Incident b. Maine d. New Hampshire f. Vermont

)

1

f. Other (specify in #10) g. Other (specify in #10)

.l 6. Initiating condition (s) based on NRC NUREG-0654 9. Meteorological, release, or other data available?

l i a. Yes (specify in #10 and submit appropriate RIA j forms as soon as possible).

j

~

b. No i 10. Comments:

I 4

1 i

1 i

i o

} New England Compact Form RIA-1 10/80 i

m 5 * *- ' ' " - - -

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR NEW ENGLAND COMPACT FORM RIA-2

, Items 1, 2, and 3 are self-explanatory.

Item 4: is identical to Item 4 on form RIA-1.

Item 5: is identical to Item 8 on form RIA-1.

Item 6: Items A, B, C and D are typical of what would be expected from a reac-tor incident. This information should be available from the. nuclear plant. If the exact composition of the release is known, or if anotbar isotope is involved (such as U-235 from a reprocessing plant), enter this isotope in ' Item E and enter any additional explanatory material in Item #15.

Item 7: The source term of the release (curies /second) should be.obtained from the nuclear plant and entered in Item A. If the exact source term is unknown, the nuclear plant should at least be able to provide their total inventory of all radionuclides and the approximate leak rate into the environment. Enter this data in Item 8.

l Item 8: Enter the release height in meters. This should be available from the plant. If release height is unknown, assume that release was at ground level.

Item 9: It is important to know if there is any type of inversion layer pre-sent. If one is present, circle yes in Item A and enter height of inversion i layer in Item B. If the height of the layer is not exactly known, enter your best guess, but put an

• after the value and explain in Item #10 how this guess was made.

l l

l l

l

! 10/80 t

O l

l l

Item 10: Wind direction at time of release -- be sure to indicate direction wind is blowing fros!! l Item 11: Enter wind speed in meters /second. For purposes of approximation, 1 meter /second = 2 mph.

Item 12: The atmospheric stability class data should be available from the nuclear f acility. They should have " downwind concentration" charts available for all wind speed and stability classes, f

Item 13: Enter the best guess as to how long present meteorological conditions will last.

Item 14: Use the same codes established in Items 9-13 to establish the project new meteorological data.

Item 15: Use this section to report any items not fully explained in previous sections. Also use this space to briefly identify any special or unique site geographic or topographical factors. Keep all information brief and to the point.

I 1

l 10/80 O

i l

w--~gn ,-,v..w, - y.-,, , - , -__--..--,.,4.,-.%,_,._-.---..---__.-...-_.-.---------.--....--...,..--,-,--c-... ------%_-

, - . -..<,.---emm..,.-.. -

s s i

- sl NEW ENGLAND COMPACT Page 1 of 2 RADIOLOGICAL INCIDENT - METEOROLOGICAL AND RELEASE DATA

1. Information received by: 2. Information sent by:

Agency: Agency:

Date: Time: Date: Time:

For TWX: Send to: FDA - Region I, Boston, MA 3. Phone (include area code):

ATTN: BRH Representative

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4. Incident Site: a. 9. Lid or inversion layer present?

Date: b. a. Yes OR No

5. Indicate the agency (s) that this information should be b. If yes, height of layer (meters):

routed to:

10. Wind direction at time of release (wind blowing from):

a. Connecticut c. Massachusetts e. Rhode Island

a. N (0*/360*) i. S (180*)

b. Maine d. New Hampshire f. Vermont b. NNE (22.5*) J. SSW (202.5*)

c. NE (45*) k. SW (225*)

f. Other (specify in #15) d. ENE (67.5') 1. WSW (247.5*)

e. E (90*) m. W (270*)

6. Type (s) of radio-isotopes involved in the release: f. ESE (112.5*) n. WNW (292.5*)

g. SE (135*) o. NW (315*)

a. Primarily I-131 h. SSE (157.5*) p. NNW (337.5*) '

b. Mixed radio-iodines

c. Primarily noble gases 11. Wind speed (meters /second) at time of release:

d. Mixture of noble gases and radio-iodines

e. Other (specify):

4 7. a. Enter the source term (s) (curies /second) for 12. Atmospheric stability class at time of release:

l isotope (s) of interest

a. Class A d. Class D g. Clas, G

! b. If source tare is not known exactly, enter total b. Class 8 e. Class E l inventory (curies) and best guess at release rate c. Class C f. Class F l environment.

l 13. How long are these conditions expected to last (hours).

l 8. Release Height (meters):

New England Compact Form RIA-2 (Page One) 10/80

i t u -

NEW ENGLAND COMPACT Page 2 of 2 RADIOLOGICAL INCIDENT - METEOROLOGICAL AND RELEASE DATA (continued)

14. Give a brief description of the anticipated meteorological conditions at the end of this period (use the letter codes found in Items 9-13).

a. Wind direction: b. Wind speed:

4

c. Stability class: d. Projected Duration:

e. Inversion layer present YES or N0 f. If Item a. was yes, height of layer:

15. Comments (include any special topographical or site specific data):

1 1

i f-l 4

{ New England Compact Form RIA-2 (Page One) 10/80 1

i

INSTRUCTIONAL SHEET FOR NEW ENGLAND CONPACT FORM RIA-3 Item 1: is self-explanatory.

Item 2: is same as Item 4.a on Form RIA-1.

Item 3: Enter total number of pages in this report.

Item 4: a. Enter consecutive sample numbers for this report.

b. Enter the type of sample (food, air, water, etc) and any sample ID # that has been assigned locally. (This is to help identify a particular sample if problems occur at a later date.)

c. Enter the instrumentation used to make the measurement (i.e., field GM, " cutie pie," NaI gamma spec., etc).

d. Enter the magnitude of the reading and the units used (i.e.,

mR/ hour, pCi/ meter 3, uCi/ gram, etc).

e. Enter the location of sample, including direction and distance from source.

f. Enter date and time sample taken.

g. Enter the agency / personnel that was/were responsible for taking the sample and/or measuring the sample.

Item 5: Enter any other facts that are special or unique about the sample. Key these comments to the sample # assigned in Item 4.a.

Use as many sheets as necessary to report each batch of sample results.

10/80 0

_,.-ry- _ ___. ,--r ,_ .-. - -_. ,-, _~m.- , , _ - _ . _ . , - _ _ _ . - _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ . . . , , , , . . . . , , , , ,

,O C i-O Q.)

NEW ENGLAND COMPACT Page 1 of 1 l

! RADIOLOGICAL INCIDENT - SAMPLING DATA i

1. Information received by: Information sent by:

1 Agency: Agency:

Date: Time: Date: Time:

i For TWX: Send to: FDA - Region I, Boston, MA Phone (include area code):

ATTN: BRH Representative i i I

2. Incident Site: 3. Page of pages

4. a. Sample b. Type & c. Instrument d. Reading e. Sample Location f. Date & g. Agency Doing Number ID Time Samplina Measurement i

1

'I l

1 .

J i

5. Comments: (Please key to Sample 8, continue on back side).

i New England Compact Form RIA-3 10/80

NEW ENGLAND COMPACT Page 1 of 2 REQUEST FOR RADIOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE 7

U 1. I (we) request the following radiological assistance from under the provisions of the New England Compact.

2. Agency requesting assistance:

3. Authorized requestor:

4. Phone (include area code):

5. Describe type and quantities of assistance requested:

a. Equipment:

b. Manpower:

c. Support Services:

6. a. Where is the assistance needed:

b. Where should equipment and/or personnel report (be specific):

New England Compact Form 10/80 RIA-4 (Page One)

NEW ENGLAND COMPACT Page 2 of 2 REQUEST FOR RADIOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE I (continued) i

c. When is the requested assistance needed:

d. Estimated duration of assistance:

e. Contact person for requested assistance -- specify location and phone number (include area code):

7. Other Comments:

O Signature of Authorized Requestor:

Date:

New England Compact Form 10/80 RIA-4 (Page Two)

APPENDIX C.

] NEW ENGLAND INTERSTATE RADIATION ASSISTANCE PLAN J

ARTICLE I - AUTHORITY l

This plan is authorized by the New England Compact on Radiological Health Protection, as approved by the Legislatures and Governors of the several party States. The Act was first passed in the State of Maine on March 1, 1967, and subsequently passed by the State of Vermont on March 14, 1967, Rhode Island on April 5, 1967, New Hampshire on July 18, 1967, Massachusetts on December 20, 1967, and Connecticut on May 24, 1969. The Compact became official with the passage of the second cooperating state. The Compact, as signed into law in each of the states, follcwed essentially the same format as developed by the New England Radiological Health Committee (NERHC). The NERHC is composed of the six New fingland Radiation Control Program Directors, the FDA Regional Radiological Health Representative and the EPA Regional Radiation Representative. The Compact also allows that any state not mentioned above which is contiguous to any party state may become a party to this Compact by enacting the same.

ARTICLE II - PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to delineate the manner in which the New England Compact on Radiological Health Protection will be implemented. The purpose of O' the New England Compact is to (a) promote the Radiological Health Protection of the public, and individuals within party states, (b) provide mutual aid and assistance in radiological health matters including, but not limited to, radiation incidents, and (c) encourage and facilitate the efficient use of per-sonnel and equipment by furthering the orderly acquisition and sharing of resources useful for programs of radiation protection. This plan outlines the manner in which this interstate mutual aid and assistance and exchange of per-sonnel will be accomplished. This plan includes specific information on the channels of communication among the states, the availability of equipment, and I laboratory capabilities, the procedures for requesting assistance from the party states and notifying party states of radiological incidents, as well as clarifi-l l cation of the procedures of the loan of personnel and equipment, and financial l obligations encountered.

ARTIC'.E III - DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The Compact Administrator or designee for each party state shall notify the Secretary of the NERHC of the identity of any subordinate or subordinates to whom his authority as Compact Administrator has been delegated. (See Appendix l I.)

l

)

C-1 l

ARTICLE IV - COMMUNICATIONS AND EXCHANGE OF PLANS O(m,/ Each Compact Administrator or Desi0 nee shall provide the hotae and office telephone number of himself or herself and/or such staff members as he or she may designate as emergency contacts. In addition, he or she shall provide a second channel of communication such as the State Police which will be operative 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day for seven days a week, and shall arrange within his or her state for emergency communications to reach a responsible staff member. Each Compact Administrator shall notify the Secretary of the above designation; and this information shall be updated at least annually in Appendix I of this plan.

ARTICLE V - LISTINGS OF EQUIPMENT AND LABORATORY CAPABILITIES Each Compact Administrator shall transmit to the Secretary a listing of available field survey equipment including range, other emergency equipment, and a listing of available laboratory capabilities by type of analysis (i.e., gross alpha, gross beta, gamma spectroscopy, etc.). Such listings shall be updates annually or more often if conditions warrant. (See Appendix II, and Appendix III.)

ARTICLE VI - REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE a) Upon determination by a Compact Administrator or Delegate that a radiation incident has taken place within his/her state of a magnitude sufficient to Os require additional personnel or equipment, the Compact Administrator or Delegate should contact the Secretary to request such aid as he/she deems necessary. The Secretary shall contact such other party state / states to request aid as he/she judged to be best able to assist under the cir-cumstances. The state / states receiving such a request should respond with personnel and/or equipment to the best of their ability, while maintaining sufficient capability for the protection of the public health within their own state. At the time of the request, said personnel should be advised of their assigned tasks and of the location and individual to which they are to report. Provisions for further briefing, when necessary, may also be arranged at the time of such request.

b) Any state responding to a request for aid under this plan shall operate while in a party state, in accordance with the radiation incident plan of that state.

c) Reimbursement by the state receiving aid or assistance under this Article for any loss or damage to, or expense incurred in the operation of any equipment; for cost of all materials, transportation and maintenance of officers, employees, and equipment; and for any compensation or benefits for injuries or death incurred by officers or employees or an aiding state shall be in accordance with Article X.

O C-2

ARTICLE VII - NOTIFICATION The notification to other party states under this plan shall be made directly by the Compact Administrator or Designee; and such notification shall also be made to the Secretary, New England Radiological Health Committee.

ARTICLE VIII - LOAN OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT, LABORATORY ANALYSIS AND EXCHANGE OF DATA a) Facilities and equipment specified in Article V of this plan may be loaned in accordance with either of the two following situations; (1) one in which the requested state is not affected by the incident in question; and, (2) one in which the requested state is or could possibly be affected by the incident in question. (See Appendix II and Appendix III.) The requesting state shall reimburse the lending state in accordance with Article X.

b) Laboratory analyses may be performed by the requested state under con-ditions specified in paragraph (a) above. (See Appendix III.)

c) Requests for assistance, exchange of data or other pertinent information may be accomplished utilizing forms in Appendix IV through the Secretary of the NERHC. Transmission shall be by the most expenditious means of com-munication available.

l ARTICLE IX - LOAN OF PERSONNEL Professional or technical personnel having special skills or training related to radiation protection may be made available to a party state upon request. Such requests should be transmitted through the NERHC Secretary, and have approval of the respective Compact Administrators or Designees. The requesting state shall reimburse the lending state in accordance with Article X.

4 ARTICLE X - CHARGES FOR EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL a) The state receiving aid or assistance shall reimburse the state rendering l aid or assistance for any loss or damage incurred in the operation of any I equipment.

b) The state receiving aid or assistance shall pay for the cost of trans-porting and maintaining all officers and employees of the state rendering aid in accordance with the rendering state's Rules and Regulations, or those of the state receiving aid--whichever is greater.

i O C-3

c) The party state borrowing personnel shall reimburse the state loaning the personnel at the same annual rate as the personnel are receiving in their O own state. The borrowing state shall pay for the cost of maintaining such personnel in accordance with Article X, Section (b).

d) Nothing contained herein in Article X shall prevent any assisting party state from assuming the costs incurred under Sections (a), (b), and (c) of Article X.

ARTICLE XI - UPDATES AND REVISIONS The Secretary of the NERHC shall be responsible for updating Appendices I and II on an annual basis and the remaining appendices when appropriate. In addition, the members of the NERHC shall notify the Secretary of changing cituations that may affect any of the items covered under this Compact. If needed, the Secretary can form a subcommittee to rewrite appropriate sections of the plan.

Revised appendices will be forwarded to all plan holders at the beginning of each calendar year.

O s

O C-4 4

---

.--.,..---,.,--,,,-...---,--..--,-,,,--,n.- ~m- - . ,, - - - - - - - , , , , a-,--- - - , . . , _ - - , , , , - - , - , , , . . - ~ , , - - - ---

APPENDIX I

/~ h CONNECTICUT U

Compact Administrator Commissioner of Environmental Protection Stanley J. Pac Business Tel: 203-566-2110 Person to Whom Authority Kevin T. A. McCarthy is Delegated Business Tel: 203-566-5668 or 5134

.8 Home Tel: 203-487-0305 Other Emergency Contacts Donald Karn j (in order of priority) Business Tel: 203-566-5668 Home Tel: 203-288-1214 Jesse Tucker Business Tel: 203-566-5626 Home Tel: 203-529-5063 8:30 to 4:30 Contact Radiation Control Office Hartford, CT

) 24-Hour-A-Day Contact- Connecticut State Police '

Ask for Executive Officer I

1 I

C-5 l

l l

.. . - . . - . - = . . . _ _ _ . - - . . __

MAINE O

Compact Administrator Commissioner, Department of Human Services H. Rollin Ives Business Tel: 207-289-2736 7

Person to Whom Authority is Delegated Donald Hoxie Business Tel: 207-289-3826 Home Tel:

Other Emergency Contacts Clough Toppan (in order of Priority) Business Tel: 207-289-5676 Home Tel: 207-582-7850 Wallace Hinckley Business Tel: 207-289-3826 Home Tel: 207-377-8834 Robert Schell 1 Business Tel: 207-289-5676 Home Tel: 207-395-4602 24-Hour-A-Day Contact Maine State Police Business Hours: 8:00 - 5:00

(

i C-6 I

i i

MASSACHUSETTS

{

Compact Administrator Commissioner, Department of Public Health Bailus Walker, Jr., Ph.D, MPH Business Tel: 617-727-2700 Person to Whom Authority is Delegated Robert M. Hallisey Business Tel: 617-727-6214, 6246 Home Tel: 617-729-5728 Other Emergency Contacts (in order of priority) George Swible Business Tel: 617-727-6214, 6246 Home Tel: 617-387-7768 Robert Watkins Business Tel: 617-727-6214, 6246 Home Tel: 617-832-3378 William Bell Business Tel: 413-586-7525 Home Tel: 413-773-7858

/-'s U 24-Hour-A-Day Contact Massachusetts State Police i

l C-7

= _ , . - . .. . - . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ - _ . _ - . - ..

I l

NEW HAMPSHIRE Compact Administrator Chief, Bureau of Environmental Health John R. Stanton Business Tel: 603-271-4587 Home Tel: 603-623-4743 Person to Whom Authority is Delegated Dian Tefft Business Tel: 603-271-4588 Home Tel: 603-524-3358 4 Donald E. Halle Business Tel: 603-271-4585 Home Tel: 603-622-9618 24-Hour-A-Day Contact New Hampshire State Police i

RHODE ISLAND Compact Administrator Director, Department of Health Joseph E. Cannon, M.D.

Business Tel: 401-277-2231 Person to Whom Authority is Delegated James E. Hickey Business Tel: 401-277-2438 Home Tel: 401-884-4732 Other Emergency Contacts (in order of priority) Charles McMahon l

Business Tel: 401-277-2438 Home Tel: 401-949-3138 l

l Roger Marinelli Business Tel: 401-277-2438 h Home Tel: 401-467-4008 l

l 24-Hour-A-Day Contact Rhode Island State Police lO 1O C-8 l

l l

^

VERMONT O Compact Administrator Commissioner, State Health Department Lloyd F. Novick, M.D.

Business Tel: 802-862-5701 Person to Whom Authority is Delegated Raymond N. McCandless Business Tel: 802-828-2886 Home Tel: 802-223-5075 Other Emergency Contacts (in order of priority) Paul Clemons Business Tel: 802-828-2886 Home Tel: 802-592-3534 Deborah Voland Business Tel: 802-257-1750 Home Tel: 802-388-3536 24-Hour-A-Day Contact Vermont State Police i

I i

l l

l C-9 l

FEDERAL CONTACT LISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Primary Contact Byron Keene Office of Radiation and Noise Business Tel: 617-223-4845 Home Tel: 617-729-8356 Other Emergency Contact Paul Bedrosian Business Tel: 617-223-1591 Home Tel: 617-475-2558 24-Hetr-A-Day Contact Oil & Hazardous Materials Duty Officer 617-223-7265

'l i FOOD AND DRUG ADNINISTRATION Primary Contact Warren Church Business Tel: 617-223-3178 Home Tel: 617-664-5307 Other Emergency Contacts Edward Baratta (in order of priority) Business Tel: 617-729-5700 Home Tel:

Paul Bolin Business Tel: 617-729-5700 Home Tel: 603-434-0596 ,

1 C-10

-a .-m. .- ,,u+- - a e - m e- .

S O

ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MAINE FIELD OPERATIONS GUIDE O

1 l

l l

O l

l - - - - - . _ . _ - - _ . - . . _ . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

O ATTACHMENT 1

(' FIELD OPERATIONS GUIDE SECTION 1 Environmental surveillance will be performed if a General Emergency is declared for Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant. (Page 2 is a copy of the action required in the emergency plan.)

The Radiological Health Coordinator (RHC) will assign a one- or two-man team to perform the duties in Section 2.

Teams will consist of State of Maine Division of Health Engineering (DHE) employees on the Primary List or Monitoring Team Call List. (See list on page 3.)

The team will meet at the Maine Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to receive final briefings from the RHC.

Environmental surveillance supplies / equipment, including personal protection equipment, will be received at the Public Health Laboratory Training Room.

All radioactive samples, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), etc, will be delivered to the loading dock of the Maine State Public Health Lab or Training Lab. No samples are to be delivered directly to the Radiation Lab.

The Monitoring team must call the State EOC at 1-800-452-8735 at 8:00 a.m., and 1:00 p.m., each day. More frequent calls during the emergency are desirable.

l l

l t

t O

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - - - - - _ _ ~ _ _ _

- . _ 1 -.. -

f'N - EMERGENCY TEAM ACTIVATION Upon notification of an event occurring at Seabrook via the Maine State Police emergency procedure, the Radiological Health Coordinator (RHC) will perform the ,

following. ,

1. Assess current status of Seabrook. The New Hampshire EOC telephone number is 1-603-271-2231,

2. If an Alert has been declared, no further action is necessary. The RHC will be informed of any change in status, either a reduction or esca-lation of the emergency.

3. If a Site Area Emergency is declared, direct staff to telephone those on the primary call list (see following page). Environmental monitoring may be required. Personnel will stand by until status is downgraded or upgraded.

4. If a General Emergency is declared, the RHC will direct staff to telephone those on the primary call list, if not already directed.

Personnel will report to the Maine EOC within 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The Maine RHC will coordinate environmental monitoring activities with the state of New Hampshire EOC. Environmental sample collection will follow sites as detailed in section II and procedures as detailed in Section 4.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR MAINE RESIDENTS The Maine RHC will recommend that actions that will serve to protect the public health be included in statements to the news media, such as:

1. remove dairy animals from pasture;

2. limit fish processing;

3. limit fruic and vegetable harvesting / consumption; and

4. limit water consumption from surface supplies.

O i .

t -e,,,' -

. - _ . , , , , _ _ . .,.__---r- -----.--. --_-,,,%.., _ - , - , - .w, ~_-. -_--.,__.-e- - - ----.e,-~---

A STATE OF MAINE PRIMARY CALL LIST Name Business Tel. Home Tel.

s DHE RAD / HEALTH SPECIALISTS MAIN SWITCHBOARD-HEALTH ENGINEERIN3 289-3826

• Donald Hoxie 289-5686 622-7445

• Clough Toppan 289-5698 582-7850

• Wallace Hinckley 289-5685 377-8834 Dave Breau 289-5673 622-0260

• Russ Martin 289-5690 622-1258 Bob Schell 289-5696 395-4602 Comm. Petit 289-2736 774-7591 Govern. Security 289-2121 Robert Gibbons 289-3531 774-3629

• Authorized to request assistance from RAC at Brookhaven.

() DHE MONITORING TEAM CALL LIST Robert Peterson 289-5693 685-9362 Francis Drake 289-5680 784-9614 Jay Hardcastle 289-5684 582-1868 David Breau 289-5673 662-0260 Kerwin Keller 289-5688 622-7712 Ronald McDougal 289-5691 622-5880 Jim Jacobsen 289-5695 623-5322 LA80RATORY PERSONNEL Thomas Dwyer 289-2696 293-3371 Cheryl Baker 289-5400 622-5400 Ernie Richardson 289-2727 622-7015 Richard L. French 289-2727 622-3876 Jack Krueger 289-2727 845-2482 O

(~ SECTION 2 U}

A. PURPOSE The ingestion EPZ for Seabrook (New Hampshire Atomic Power Company) extends into Maine. The North and Northeast sections lie almost entirely within the bounds of the State. Environmental monitoring may be requirod within these sections, following an event at Seabrook Station.

Section 2 of the Field Operations Guide (FOG) serves to direct the Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture (DEP/AGRI) response teams to pre-selected points to collect critical information on food and water contamination.

In general, cach response team will be directed to collect samples in one

" sector." A sector is 22 %* sector of a circle, the midpoint of which is one of the 16 points of the compass. A sector ic named for the compass point, and sample station numbers are selected by sector and distance from Seabrook Station.

Of primary interest is environmental monitoring of milk and surface water supplies. Soil, vegetables, hay and shellfish samples will be collected and will serve to verify projections of contaminants made by the Radiological Health Coordinator at the State EOC.

O r

l l

Ah 5.'

)'

g ,o -.:~ . . y -

(.. ,a .7.

4 a ge' ;,.h x q ' ..1. ... -s. ..w.. . .y t. . , .. -

7 4. )

L.. '. - n hr. .. ,JY /,~. ^] cs . . . . . . '.'.5

' R d'..* . 55'

, ,~. y e . _ftC.~i

~

h('O .... s \ % e NE

. }f.l .3 / RQS p(st ' =~L *m ".!.

~

,+. & n y (s . .. . ,

)

.i .

q,Q

r.  :

N'

- \ '..u . .

a.

. .Q :, ; ,, .sa, .-.-. ,- ..

?. a.," ,a .

C . * *.*

j N(, ,c

\

~

7, a

,4.. ,. .

. . e ~. '*

50MILES . .. ~

p,'*'"I.'.'

9 R( ,- A, .c' & ,' 4~&  %

.n,/, .}.-.. h. c.". .. I r- ..

(

-c.b .N '.m. Et ] ' ' ./

[,.* ^

c ,. /~mswa;\. 'h( p."..2 ;- ~- , . .s s..

4

. ,.. s ,

% ..,s,g n. ,3

, g f m .

m..

. . -. fo ENE 7 3. s.s ... .f, 3 -

,s.

. \. ;, ,,4 -

,,,q . '4

)'

5

. t ;. .

~'

~

\- ,g l

. T 'Y

, s% s

,;4& x,_ 10,;;.,r y . 3 ,2

. -- -([w w . - .rsny, . 3

.. x , , ,e

, w e' seoso ;g4

'y . 4 b.-~.'

'7T \_ "

q ,

i scannoon sne j

~ w v . . . .. .. " ... ,. ...u,, .

,1

_. D.' *; ..

. E

, ,Q g .. .- ~,. \'

t' r,y y- *

. . ... s /. . :,:.? - f 3 - ~ ,N I e ..

.g-

. - ' \

{

f ..,. ,4) ' T' "'\:f ' y N .k ~- [

w 5~ ~. . .l

/ .g.g ,,-  ; _r 6 .W n' r

ESE i b.-

-- N. gg.. .

, .,4* u-w ,,

u. . ,se,..f .

. - .-- - . :=w, .:.. . ..

. e,

..' , ,,,.yn. h'.g/, E.,' X -

, W )***;). *' - \g * '

. , , . .t*- . . .y g I " '

Os *~; f  ;.s '& -

k.O . A l , [ l:;

=.

t .:,: m:.QJ., . + , ..

W f ,.' *. % .

i. .

k ..'f f

] . .,.

• .. gj ', .

th'ls .bj

) b e

• q l ,I, [. "' 2 - Scate 1500.000 l "A*

..'..,.,...g.,-

1 ,

. w(. .J A . ' q .C .-

. s4. y G Contour mterval 200 feet g, ,q,.,.

i l l sk j--J' '*' ', .* #' g); ,

,, , ,,, 3

.a --

. 4 .ie:w'Q, ,{,, -A --

a .

.< sinoonam n ene o j

,, ...g

..b '.

~

am

/

5 ,, ,,

FOLK SE

~ , -

. . _j ,~...s.  ; e' m 4 es f ."* ..

.f. ., r l

womego

b. (' b$ .d,. Ch"' ssE

%%%[,$d.b'f98hkM%..

L SEABROOK STATION INGESTION EXPOSURE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (COUNTY DESIGNATIONS) 1

-_. _ - .--- _.--_-_~ - - - -_._.- __- .. _ - --- - _ _ . , -. -

4 B. NOTIFICATION AND COMMUNICATIONS (v}

1. The RHC will call one person on the DEP and AGRI team call lists, beginning with the first name listed. The first person contacted will contact two additional persons who will proceed to the Maine Public Health Laboratory Training Room adjacent to the Laboratory Office at 221 State Street in Augusta at a time designated by the RHC. Note: An early notification may request team members to stand by for further instructions.

DEP MONITORING TEAM MEMBERS 1 EMERGENCY RESPONSE NUMBER 1-800-482-0777 Name Home No. Business No.

N Perry C. Cogburn 724-3233 289-3355 Stan Johnson David Sait 549-5650 289-2437 Al Prysunka 289-2437 AGRI MONITORING TEAM MEfSERS Allan R. Greenier 487-5905 289-3841 4

Dana W. Small 666-3013 289-3841 Audrey Peckham 786-4690 289-3841 l James W. 8artlett 487-6934 289-3841 Robert E. Clark 549-7933 289-3841 Robert Sylvester 437-5961 289-3841 Joseph La8recque 872-5949 289-3841 Gerald J. Chestnut (York County) 883-4244 289-3841 1 Mary Bryant 726-3956 289-3841 1

() Stanley Millay 785-4070 289-3841

O 2. During the emergency, Maine's DHE and Civil Emergency Preparedness (CEP) will provide telephone communication with the Maine EOC through the switchboard at DHE. Note: Use telephone numbers on TLD/ID Cards to call CEP or DHE at the EOC.

3. Maine DEP/AGRI. teams will meet at the Maine Public Health Laboratory (PHL) at a designated. time for briefing and issuance of personal dosi-metry and equipment. Equipment and supplies are distributed as listed in Section 4, page 18. Radiation Health Chemists will insure equipment is received.

4. Assignments will be preassigned. Teams will be deployed by sector.

5. Teams will telephone Maine DHE or Maine EOC at least once each hour using the confidential line.

C. DEPLOYMENT OF TEAMS ,

1. Maine DEP/AGRI teams consist of two persons, one from each agency.

2. The RH.C,wil'1 notify the Radiation Chemist at the PHL of the sectors in which environmental samples will be collected.

3. The Radiation Chemist will give a card with a Sector designation imprinted on it to each team activated. ,

4. Teams will follow a designated route as defined in this section.

Most sample stations will be dairy farms or public water supp110s.

Samples will be collected by standard methods and returned to the training lab. For collection methods, see Section 4.

D. RADIATION EXPOSURES AND PERSONAL PROTECTION

1. Team members will do the following. Wear a TLD, a 0-20 R low energy dosimeter (LED), and 0-200 mR LED. Telephone the DHE confidential number when direct reading instruments indicate a whole-body exposure of greater than 5000 mR (SR). Read direct-reading instruments each hour and record the reading.

2. Team members will be advised by telephone when the projected radiation dose to emergency workers is 75%, 100%, 125% and 150% for thyroid and whole-body dose. A radiation dose to emergency workers above 100% is strictly voluntary. No emergency workers will be allowed to receive more than 200% of the whole-body dose.

3. It shall be the policy of DHE to recommend initiation of KI (potassium iodide) at the Public Health Laboratory prior to field monitoring.

s e

l' __

E. TERMINATION OF SHIFT G

1. Environmental samples will be returned to the Public Health Laboratory (See Section 4).

2. TLD, 1-20 R LED, and 1-200 mR LED will be logged in and recorded.

3. Clothing will be acnitored for contamination. Thyroid will be moni-tored for exposure.

4. A discharge card will be issued with the time a person should return for work. If exposure to teams is in excess of 100 mR, the exposed will be referred for further medical evaluation at the Maine Medical Center.

l l

I l

t O

i

TLD ROUTE FOR YORK COUNTY O

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Drive south from Augusta on the Maine Turnpike and take Exit 4 (Biddeford).

Turn left cnto Rte. 111E and drive 1.3 miles. Turn right onto Rte. 1S and drive another 1.3 miles. TLD Station #1 is located on the third telephone pole after the Biddeford Motel, (NET #131) on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #1, Biddeford)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 8 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 0 2" cpm Continue on Rte. 1A for 4.6 miles. TLD is located on the telephone pole (NET 1 #161-61) next the Mann Memorial Clinic for Animals on the left side of the road.

(TLD Station #2, Arundel)

[]

O TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 1.5 miles on Rte. 1S. Turn left onto Rtes. 9AE and 35S and drive 0.7 miles. TLD is located on the telephone pole (NET #38) in front of a large blue house with white trim (Bibber). (TLO Station 93, Kennebunk) l []

l TIME l DATE i CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 2.9 miles on Rtes. 9AE and 35S and turn right onto Rte. 9W. Drive 0.95 miles to an intersection with Fairview Drive. TLD is located on the telephone pole (CMP #47) across from Fairview Drive on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #4, Kennebunkport)

a

/ []

'C/ TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm COV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 3.2 miles on Rte. 9W and turn left onto Rte. 1S. Drive 1.4 miles, just past Pizza World on the left and York County Farms Market on the right. TLD is located on telephone pole (NET #89) on the right side of the road just after the market. (TLD Station #5, Wells)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 2.7 miles to a large " Wells Beach" sign. Turn left onto Eldridge Drive and drive 1.0 miles. Turn right and park along the cement wall. Take seaweed and water samples. (Station #5A)

[]

.,. TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Go back to Rte. 1 and turn left. Drive 3.0 miles on Rte. 1S into Ogunquit to the police station. TLD is located on the telephone pole (CMP #2) next to the police station. (TLD Station #6)

[]

TIME DATE l

CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm l Go back to Rte. 1 and turn left. Drive 5.3 miles on Rte. 1S just past Blueberry Hill Child Development Center. TLD is located on a telephone pole (#290) about 100 yards past this on the right side of the road, slightly farther away from the road than usual. (TLD Station #7, York)

[]

TIME l DATE

CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue on Rte. 1S for 6.8 miles and turn left beyond Walt's Factory onto Haley Road. Continue 3.0 miles and bear right on Rte. 103 at fire station. Drive 0.4 i

miles and turn left across from the Kittery Point Post Office to Bellamy Wharf.

Take seaweed and water samples. (Station #8a) d

l' D []

(__/' TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 100 Reading 9 2" cpm Go back to Rte. ? and turn left. Drive 0.2 miles to Dexter Shoe. TLD is located on a telephone pole (NET #277-24) across from the shoe store on the left side of the road. (TLD Station #8, Kittery)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 0 2" cpm Continue on Rte. 1S to Rte. 236N. Drive 6.3 miles on Rte. 236N and turn left onto Rte. 101W. Go 0.1 miles to Old Field Road. TLD is located on the telephone pole (CMP #1, NET #149) across from this road. (TLD Station #9, Eliot)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Go back to Rte. 236 and turn left. Continue 4.4 miles and bear right, still on Rte. 236N. Drive 0.3 miles to a Getty filling station. TLD is located on the telephone pole (CMP #33-?) across from the filling station. (TLD Station #10, South Berwick)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm COV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 3.6 miles on Rte. 236N and turn right onto Rte. 9E. Drive 0.6 miles just past Mobil filling station. TLD is located on the second telephone pole (NET #S4-30S) past the filling station on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #11, Berwick)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 6.5 miles and turn left onto Rte. AN. Drive 1.0 miles just past a Masonic lodge. TLD is located on the second telephone pole (NET #87-34) past the lodge on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #12, North Berwick)

. IME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 7.3 miles on Rte. 4N to Rte._4A intersection. Drive straight across, still on Rte. AN,-and continue for 1.8 miles. TLD is located on the second telephone pole (NET #111-9) past Cozy Corner Store on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #13, Sanford)

[]

TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm Continue 2.7 miles on Rte. 4N and turn right onto Rte. 111E and drive 1.0 miles.

TLD is located on a telephone pole (NET #321, CMP #J16) on the right side of the road across from G.R. Robert, Inc. (TLD Station #14, Alfred)

[]

TIME DATE COV 700 Reading 9-30" cpm COV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm O Continue 5.2 miles on Rte. 111E, just past an intersection with a flashing light. TLD is on a telephone pole (CMP #J310, MET #477) 0.1 miles past the light on the right side of the road. (TLD Station #15, Lyman)

[]

! TIME DATE CDV 700 Reading 9 30" cpm CDV 700 Reading 9 2" cpm

{ Go back to the flashing light and turn left on Rte. 35S. Drive 1.7 miles to the Kennebunk River at the intersection of the town lines of Lyman, Arundel, and Kennebunk. Take fresh water sample. (Station #15A) l l

O t l

. - - . - - . - - - , , - - - - - - . - - - . - - - . . _ ~ . - - - .-,

f- s SURVEILLANCE REPORT - CHECKOFF LIST DATE:

.(v)

TLD Qty Seawater M1y Seaweed M1y Fresh Water M1y

===================================================================

1. 1 Biddeford just past Biddeford Motel

1. 2 Arundel at Mann Memorial Clinic

1. 3 Kennebunk in front of the Bibber residence

1. 4 Kennebunkport across from Fairview Drive

1. 5 Wells across from Wells Union Antiques

1. 5A Moody Point at Moody Point (Wells Beach)

( #6 Ogunquit at police station

1. 7 York just past Blueberry Hill Child Dev. Cent.

1. 8A Bellamy Wharf at Bellamy Wharf (Pepperrell Cove)

1. 8 Kittery across from Dexter Shoe Store

1. 9 Eliot inters. Rte. 111 and Old Field Road

1. 10 Scath Berwick across from Getty filling station

1. 11 Berwick just past Mobil filling station

1. 12 North Berwick just past Masonic lodge

1. 13 Sanford just past Cozy Corner Store

1. 14 Alfred across from G.R. Roberts, Inc.

__...__...._____________.4...___...____.... _______________....___________..___

1. 15 Lyman just past Rte. 111 and 35 inters.

1. 15A Kennebunk River on Rte. 35 at intersection of Lyman, Arundel, and Kennebunk town lines

, i k

I i

SECTION 3 PERSONAL PROTECTION PROCEDURES A. PURPOSE The purpose of the procedures is to control radiation exposures to emergency workers. Epidemiological studies of large groups of persons exposed to known amounts of radiation provide much knowledge.

It is important to be able to assess the radiation dose to all emergency workers; therefore, every emergency worker is issued a CDV-700 geiger-Mueller counter and self-reading LED for evaluation in the field plus a TLD for the official record of whole-body radiation dose by each emergency worker.

About 65 environmental TLD stations are maintained to be able to calculate the dose to the general population. Changing these TLDs shortly after a release of radiation will be an important task for the 2-person DHE monitoring team described in Section 1 of the FOG.

B. PROCEDURE 4 1. Under Section 1, the DHE monitors will report to the Public Health Laboratory at 221 State Street in Augusta; sign a checkoff list; and receive the following.

a. Instrument kits kept at PHL 4 b. Portamobile radio on CD frequency

c. TLD for radiation dose assessment i d. 0-200 mR and 0-20 R LEDs l

l DHE monitoring team members will then proceed to the York County EOC for an l assignment.

A 2-person DHE team will receive assignment from the RHC over the com-munication link between the York County and State EOCs to change TLDs and collect environmental samples.

2. Under Section 2, the DEP/AGRI monitors will report to the Public Health Laboratory at 221 State Street in Augusta; sign a checkoff list; and receive the following.

a. Instrument kit

b. TLD for radiation dose assessment

c. 0-200 mR and 0-20 R LEDs

d. Assignment card from Radiation Specialist l _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ - - . _ _ _ _

C. EMERGENCY WORKER EXPOSURE LIMITS j Exposure to a radiation dose above 25 Rem to the whole body and/or 125 Rem to the thyroid is strictly voluntary. -

! Notify the Radiological Health Coordinator at the State EOC if self-reading LEDs indicate an exposure greater than 5 Rems.

Each monitoring team member will check self-reading LED dosimeters and record v date, time, and dosimeter reading, in space provided on Exposure Card.

4 i

i' f

i i

l l

l l

i I ,

i i

I l

E i l

/ FIELD TEAM DOSE HISTORY RECORD

• C Date:

Mo. Day Yr.

Last Name First Name Initial TEAM MEMBERS: 1) 2)

Team members will now designate themselves as #1 or #2.

Date Team Dosimeter 1 Dosimeter Thyroid Readina Time #1 (0-20R) (0-200mR) (cpm from G-M tube) 1 Mo/ Day /Yr 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

2 Mo/ Day /Yr 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

[/)

\--

3 Mo/ Day /Yr A.M.

1 2

P.M.

4 Mo/ Day /Yr 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

5 Mo/ Day /Yr. 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

6 Mo/ Day /Yr 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

7 Mo/ Day /Yr 1 A.M. 2 P.M.

• Readings must be taken every hour unless directed otherwise.

O

. SECTION 4

'7

\

SAMPLE COLLECTION PROCEDURE 9

The Public Health Laboratory will use 3.5 liters liquid or 3.5 kg solid environ-mental samples. For radiologically contaminated samples, usually 1 liter or 1 kg size sample is sufficient.

A. SURFACE WATER

1. Select stream samples from mid-stream, if possible, and reservior samples from the largest possible portion of the reservior.

l l 2. Use a 1-gallon plastic container, and collect the samples by sub-i merging the neck of the container 3 to 6 inches below the surface of 1 the water.

3. Label the container and the cap using waterproof marker. Include sample number, (if known), last name of collector, location, time, and date of collection.

4. Screw the container cap on tightly; seal with tape; and check for

. leaks.

8. DRINKING WATER

\/

l

1. Choose a sample site of the tap that is known to be connected to the i desired water system, frequently used, and not treated with water sof-teners, filters, etc.

2. Use a 1-gallon plastic container to collect water samples.

j 3. Label the container and the cap using a waterproof marker. Include i sample number (if known), last name of collector, location, time, and date of collection.

4. Open the cold water faucet and allow it to flow until the water level is within 2 centimeters of the tap.

l 5. Screw the container cap on tightly; seal with tape; and check for leaks.

C. MILK

1. Use a 1-gallon plastic container. Collect the sample from the freshest milk source. Note time of last milking. Pay for the milk sample (usually $2.00), and obtain a signed receipt form and include on ,

your expense account.

2. Complete the information on the provided label.

O I

r 6

--v ------.y- ..-,3-e- .-- - - n--w- w.--,w -e---w---. .-,-,,.----,-w, -,-,rc

l l

O D. MEAT AND MEAT PRODUCTS

1. Ensure animal was slaughtered after the contaminating event.

2. Collect approximately 3.5 kg of a specific type of meat product (muscle, liver, thyroid, etc) and place in plastic bag (18 inches x 18 inches) and tie neck of bag.

3. Label bag with collector's name, type of meat, location, date, and time of collection.

4. Place in a second bag, and tie it.

E. VEGETABLES

1. Collect 1 kg (3 lb) of cabbage or other leafy vegetables in season.

Place in the provided plastic bag. Pay for the vegetables and obtain a signed receipt form and include on your expense account.

2. Complete the information on the provided label.

F. HAY. PLANTS, ETC

1. Collect most of the vegetation from 1-square meter and place material in a provided plastic bag.

j

() 2.

3.

Complete the information on the provided label.

Using a CDV-700 Geiger counter, pass the instrument (window closed) 2 l

inches above the surface of the ground and record the maximum reading.

G. SOIL s l

1. Using a pointed ditch shovel, cut a square sod of soil, about the width of the shovel blade, from the center of the square meter sample area.

2. Carefully place the sod in a plastic bag so that the soil horizons lia horizontally and parallel to the bottom of the plastic bag.

Additional soil may be scooped from the bottom of the hole to add to the bottom of the soil sample to represent the original soil profiled to a depth of 18 inches.

3. Do not six up the soil in the bag. Handle carefully.

4. Complete the information on the provided label.

5. Fill in the hole.

H. SEAWEED ALGAE

1. Fill a large plastic bag full of seaweed equal to at least 3.5 kg (over

/ 10 lb).

2. Complete the information on the provided label.

i . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

, I. SEAWATER

1. Use a 1-gallon plastic container to collect water samples. Submerge ,

the neck of the container 3 to 6 inches below the surf ace of the water. J

2. Complete the information on the provided label.

. J. EGGS

1. Collect enough eggs, directly from farm if possible, to nearly fill cubitainer.

2. Break eggs and funnel into cubitainer.

3. Place shells in plastic bag (12 inches x 12 inches) and seal bag.

4. Screw cubitainer cap on tightly and seal with tape.

5. Bag and label cubitainer with last name of collector, location, time, and date of collection.

K. OTHER INFORMATION

1. Read the COV-700 at waist height in counts per minute (cpm), to measure the amount of potential whole-body gamma dose at that point using the probe with the window closed. Record on station check-off sheet in Section 1 and/or 2.

i 2. Give the cpm reading to DHE during the hourly phone call to the DHE using the confidential telephone number. Give station number, cpe, and the time of reading.

fi I

!O

LIST OF EQUIPMENT FOR MONITORING TEAMS

'GJ.

1 FOG 1 Department of Transportation (DOT) highway map 1 CDV-700 Geiger Mueller Counter (Civil Defense yellow box) 25 plastic bags 10 1-gallon plastic bottles 1 shovel 1 trowel 1 pair of grass clippers 1 package of labels 1 package of twistias 1 receipts 10 cubitainers, 1 gallon ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR PLUME E?Z MONITORING TEAM 2 respirators and radionuclide cartridges 1 3-foot stepladder for changing TLDs 1 supply of prepared TLDs to add to TLD stations LABORATORY PROCEDURE O The following shall be completed.

1. Samples returned will be left at the loading dock at the PH Laboratory.

2. Samples will be transferred inside the building only by Radiation Chemists.

3. Place sample collection data (part of Sections 1 and 2) in the manila enve-lope and place team number, team members, sample sequence code, and date on envelope and deliver to information desk at the PHL.

4 O

. . , -.- . . - . _ . . . . _ . . . ~ . - . - . _ . - . . - - - . ~ . - - . - - ~ - - . . . . - . - . . . . - . - . . .

i 4

i t i i '

i i

t i  !

A i

I a

ATTACHMENT 2

{ LAND USE DATA 4

a i

l 1

CONFIDEENTIAL  ;

i >

1 i l6 f

i i i i r 4-t i:

THIS DOCUMENT IS MAINTAINED UNDER [

l SEPARATE COVER AT THE STATE EMERGENCY

! OPERATIONS CENTER e  !

i  ;

1 I

)

t t

P l

i 1

j i' 1

I I i

---n . .- . _ _ _ . - - , __ _

-- .h u a_ - , - - e+e s -., - n- - _ , _ , --a - - -- e a 2.,a m. .a e,,a---nav.wm---ss-s a,--- - - ,u. . , _ . _ , , - --

d ATTACHMENT 3 DISASTER LIAISON TEAM REPRESENTATIVES i

1 I

i I

i l

6 C

- - - - - - - - , - - ,__ -n- _ - - . ,_ ,-

ATTACHMENT 3 DISASTER LIAISON TEAM REPRESENTATIVES

\ /

AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE 8USINESS/HOME TELEPHONE AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND #28 (PEST) Henry Jennings 289-2731/

RURAL RESOURCES (F000 INSP) Allan R. Greenior 289-3841/487-5905 (SOIL & WATER) Frank Ricker 289-2666/

(REGULATIONS) Clayton Davis 289-3841/

CI.VIL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS #72 Robert Malaney 289-4080/622-2053 (24-hours: 1-800-452-8735 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION #17 David Sait 289-2651/283-3563 (24-hour 800-482-0777) Alan Prysunka 289-2651/585-4516 EXECUTIVE #1 Sharon Miller 289-3531/799-8209 David Sparks 289-3531/

HUMAN _ SERVICES #1 (HEALTH ENG) Don Hoxie 289-3826/

(DEP COMMR) Douglas Hall 289-2546/289-3419 i

(HEALTH 8UREAU) 8ill Shook 289-3201

,) (HEALTH LA8) Jack Krueger 289-2727

\~ - (DISEASE CONTROL) Dr. Graham 289-3591 INLAND FISHERIES & WILDLIFE #41 Sgt. Gary Anderson 289-5220/833-2320 Lt. Langdon Chandler 289-2175/

MARINE RESOURCES #21 Capt. Perley M. Sprague 289-2291 Lt. Charles Hutchings 779-3380/725-2794 TRANSPORTATION #16 John Dority 289-2661/622-6911 Philip N. Henry 289-3775/377-8538 PUBLIC SAFETY #42 Capt. Ralph Folsom 289-2155/

James Wright 289-3393/

Departments that are underlined comprise the Nucleus of the Disaster Liaison Team.

OTHERS

()

A ,/

USDA/ORONO Dave Staples USDA Office 81dg.

866-4976 m

Orono, Maine 04473 1

COMMUNITIES WITHIN YORK COUNTY

/ THAT ARE

(]s,/ WITHIN 50 MILES OF SEABROOK STATION ACTON (1985 Projection)

Officials Telephone Population Victor Mee, Jr. 477-2974 1,400 Lorraine Yeaton 636-2146 John Hobbs 477-2907 ALFRED Town Office 324-3521 2,200 Earl L. Hanson 324-2410 Spero S. Therianos 324-3340 Dorothy M. Hill 324-4777 ARUNDEL Town Office 985-7523 2,200 Roger Taschereau 284-8624 985-2449 O Louis Bergeron Velma Jones Ralph L. Harris 985-3005 282-5276 BERWICK Town Office 698-1101 4,750 David Soucy 698-1944 Robert Dowling 698-1225 Lester L. Laing 698-5534 Samuel Mathews 698-1866 Amanda Goodrich 698-1977 BIDDEFORD Town Office 283-0181 20,600 Robert M. Farley (Mayor) 283-0181 Paul N. Therrien 283-0181 Donald R. Guillereault 283-0181 DAYTON Town Office 499-7526 1,050 Clement E. Meserve, Jr. 499-7919 David W. Smith 499-2293 Alan D. Mullett 499-7741 O .

2-

3 i

ELIOT (1985 O' Telephone Projection)

Population Officials Town Office 439-1813 5,550 Jessie Kent 439-9313 James D. Atwood 439-4890 Fred F. King, Jr. 439-2748 .

KENNEBUNK Town Office 985-2102 6,700 Dorothy E. Stevens 985-2102

-Boyd Long 985-2102 David H. Shields 985-2102 KENNEBUNKPORT Town Office 967-4243 Carl G. Bartlett 967-3407 Barbara L. Josselyn 967-4824 Charles W. Sullivan 967-4817 KITTERY Town Office 439-0452 9,200 O

g Gary H. Reiner Frank R. Kauffman, 439-9050 439-9347 Clark T. Carson 439-4433 LEBANON Town Office 457-1171 3,850 Howard Chick 457-1141 Harold Randell 457-1372 Ronal N. Patch 339-9585 NORTH BERWICK Town Office 676-3353 3,300 Jerry T. Ballantine 676-4415 Patricia J. Herrick 676-3330 Alan Gray 676-2246 OLD ORCHARD BEACH Town Office 934-5714 b,950 Gordon Smith 934-2062 Horace J. Allen 934-9344 Paul P. Ladakakos 934-4815 O

OGUNQUIT (1985 (q

'\ /

i Officials Telephone Projection)

Population Town Office 646-9361 1,492 Anthony Tucceri 646-7305 Thomas Dillon 646-2488 John Miller ,646-2679 SACO Town Office 284-4830 12,800 Eric Cote (Mayor) 282-9012 Lorraine Whitten 284-4830 Lawrence Jordan, Jr. 284-4830 Paul Janson 284-4830 SANFORD Town Office 324-1080 19,700 James J. Shirley 324-1080 David L. Carpenter 324-1080 Mona Hale 324-1080 SHAPLEIGH Town Office 636-2839 1,600 O Ruth Ham Barry Houston Robert P. Wehmeyer 636-3426 793-8772 636-3149 SOUTH BERWICK Town Office 384-2263 4,500 Richard R. Goulet 384-2680 Gloria F. Roberge 384-9751 Gerald MacPherson, Sr. 384-2233 WATERBORO Town Office 247-5166 3,500 Andrew Woodsome, Jr. 793-2322 Robert Fay 247-5635 Dennis G. Abbott 247-5166 WELLS 646-5113 7,650 Town Office James L. Wiggin 646-9727 Harry E. Margeson 646-2481 H. Donald James 646-3418 O

• YORK (1985 Projection)

Officials Telephone Population ,

I Town Office 363-2660 9,700 1 i

! Micheal V. Palumbo 363-2660 Margaret J. Dixon 363-2660 Virginia S. Spiller . 363-2660 i

i i

l i

1

'l l

I i

i e

+

P

-S-

---

++-y-.w,- - vww w r-e . ,, wr ew - w -ww w- __ . _ - e.ee

f w, _. 4a . 4 4 e 6Ai--S4+ mad-m -ah m ahae mea-A4A+d"4 4 4-+--+- <-I'M 4.'1-=I------,A.k*aJ-A- AAMmM4A---J8 a.44--A m. m k

-. m - - = AA. a _ A m. 4_ ama__

j i

f i

i e

f ATTACHMENT 4 i

FARMER MOTIFICATION PERSONNEL i

d i

CONFYDENTIAL I

i i

i 1

1 i

l.  !

l THIS DOCUMENT IS MAINTAINED UNDER SEPARATE COVER AT THE STATE EMERGENCY l OPERATIONS CENTER i

I l

l i

l l'

l l

I I

l l

l l

l l

(

'-- --e-, __ --- - __ ___.# m _ ,_