ML20210T561
Text
. .
. . ),
.M lliFORMATION ONLY
..qngw g.72.aoai
. 4ege: 1 Rev.: 2 {
THE '. CLEVELAND .. ELECTRIC . ILLUMINATING COMPANY '
LEEB 211986 !
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATIONS MANUAL l
__-_:__----_ = - - = =
e,
. e TEMPORARY IMSTRUCTIDH
.. e
, 12 -
___ ^^u_-_
l IIILE:
Identifying and Evaluating January 31. 1986
, Suspected Earthquake Damage
.TTPE W.~ INSTRUCTION: cenera1 Teaporary
.;EFTEcrITE SKFIRA2 TON '
$N, ,
7 IM2E: . 2[Je/pd DATE: #/Jo/tt narE AREE:
T. Hicks /L. Hinson 2[////g hmi Ct G. _ 1 __ - ahP/rP6 '
96-34 . '
2/n/fe A N vto:
\% h , p. y- e4
%)kkw i shrk
/
/
. l
,I i
h[3h 2 860321 I HIATT86-91 PDR
OM19A GTI-0003 Paga : 11 Rev. 2
+
Identifying and Evaluating January 31, 1986 Earthquake Related Damage GTI-0003 t
Table of Contents f
Section Title Page 1.0 Purpose 6 1
I 2.0 scope 1
l 3.0 Responsibility 1 I i
4.0 References 2
5 .'O i
Definitions 1 i
2 I I 6.0 I
" Details 3
6.1 General r 6.2 3 Review / Documentation of Earthquake 3 Inspection Team Items
- ' 6.3 ,
6.4 Review / Documentation of New Work Requests 4 Processing Work Requests r 6 >
7.0 Attachments 7
7.1 Attachment l- Seismic Review Tracking Log 8 Form: GTI-0003-1 ,
7.2 !
7.3 Attachment 2- Evaluation Form: GTI-0003-2 9 i Attachment 3- Work Directions Form: GTI-0003-3 10 '
L h
t i
k i
. f
... ,_ ,m y-_ ,,__,- _- ,-.,,.,_.. .- _____,,_.__._._e_. _ , , -w - -w r
a OM19A: GTI-0003 Page : (([
- Rev. : 2 10CTR50.59 Applicability Check Yes No Is there a change to the plant as described in the FSAR7 Reason: 7//3 f f+ foe,7w deur.fr< l l '
l@
Ate r% e n 2e.bsr ews rmau 72< Zu.s fraeu &
^% e.mf.ars ;canise;is ** 3r.4a e Is there a change to a procedure / instruction as described in the FSAR7 Reason: .rf,(, ., rm ,i. s U M L e w .w ai 1 w/ Aaresses visa. e/M s, / fr. ms j
D.s s .,ne, a ,q,c , .e .s' .v.7 c.~ s.*u- .4.* so.*r Is there a test or experiment not described in the FSAR7 Reason:
k, h e u.) A n m ri ~
M, w o .<,.,,- w _ U @
Is there a change to the Technical Specifi-
/>
on cat}op.st e4 A/.
fy c9, 13 4 a sra.s% .~ raw.ser Wawn.~) O W Is there an affect on the environment or change on the Environmental Protection Plan? R lsl Reason: rx, n;su s. , Ar.e, m ciG~e a ,-
, oe Ds is a >s.r- n -rM rr
@ Answers to all questions are "No", no potential for an Unreviewed Safety or Environmental Question exists, no further review required.
O ^=ewere to one or = ore 9=eetta=a to " Tee". rarther review required.
Prepared By: _
[ Date: 2////ft Reviewed By: d & gw Date: Q//M Approved By:
, , i
//g[mm Date: 4 3 C i /
_ SCOPE OF REVISION:
OM19A: GTI-0003 l Paga : 1 Rav. : 2
~
1.0 Purpose
- To describe the process for the documentation, review and evaluation of (1) items identified during the plant inspections conducted immediately after the January 31, 1986 seismic event and (2) event.
newly discovered items that may have resulted from the seismic 2.0 Scope In order 1986, to accurately document the impact of the January 31, seismic event at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, damage that may have resulted from the event must be identified and properly evaluated.
.t This instruction describes the process for reviewing and evaluating the system / structural engineering inspection team results identified immediately following the January 31, 1986, seismic event. It is used in conjunction with PAP-0606 " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications" by documenting the items in '
the earthquake generated Condition Report Investigation Summary.
This instruction also describes the process for reviewing and evaluating new Work Requests to identify any damage which could have been caused by the earthquake and not identified in the inspection team results described above. Any further
- documentation of plant system, structure and component (SSC) damage shall be through the generation of a Work Request. ,
3.0 Responsibilities !
3.1 The GSE Technical Section shall review the disposition of Earthquake Inspection Team Items (EITIs) identified during the January process. 31, 1986, seismic event through the Condition Report He shall forward the Condition Report dispositioning ,
these items to PORC for review.
3.2 The General Supervising Engineer, Outage Planning Section has the overall responsibility for Work Request review and evaluation, and for informing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of earthquake related damage.
3.3 i The PWC Review Team is responsible for the review and initial screening of incoming Work Requests. The Review Team will ;
i identify plant or equipment damage which could have potentially resulted from the January 31, 1996 earthquake.
3.4 The Compliance Engineer shall coordinate the disposition of the l EITIs with the appropriate onsite engineering organization for 1 input into the Condition Report process.
I
OM19A: GTI-0003 Paga : 2 Rsv. : 2 4.0 References 4.1 POP-1501," Identification and Control of Deficient Items".
4.2 PAP-0502, " Preparation. Review, Approval, Revision, and Cancellation of Administrative Procedures".
4.3 PAP-0606, " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications".
4.4 PAP-0902, " Work Request Sys' tem".
4.5 PAP-0905, " Work Order Process".
4.6 Confirmatory 1986. Action Letter, (CAL-RIII-86-01A), dated February 4, 5.0 Definitions 5.1 Earthquake Inspection Team Items (EITIs) t Items identified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the January 31, seismic '
event by the system / structure engineering inspection team and any others items deemed appropriate by the GSE Technical Section.
These items will be evaluated utilizing this instruction for ;
applicability to established Corrective Action programs Request, (e.g. Work Nonconformance Report, etc).
5.2 Project Work Center (PWC) Review Team A review team composed of design and PWC engineers assigned to i review new Work Requests. The personnel assigned to the review team include engineers with the following backgrounds: ;
Engineers who are trained and experienced in plant design features, system testing, operations and plant Technical Specifications.
An engineer experienced in piping design and construction and in stress analysis.
An engineer experienced in building structural design and construction.
Engineers representing the electrical and mechanical disciplines who are experienced in plant design and construction.
l
. OM19At GTI-0003 Paga : 3 Rav. : 2 6.0 Details 6.1 General 6.1.1 Nonconformance Reports (NRs) and Work Requests (WRs) shall be generated utilizing the criteria of POP-1501,
" Identification and control of Deficient Items".
6.1.2 Initial disposition of EITIs will be tracked by the Compliance Engineering Unit and shall be incorporated into an appropriate Condition Report (CR) Investigation Summary.
6.1.3 All additional abnormal or unusual observations shall be initially documented by a Work Request. These items shall not be reworked, repaired, adjusted, or otherwise disturbed prior to review and disposition in accordance with this
, instruction.
6.1.4 Those conditions which may involve potentially reportable events or SSC OPERABILITY shall also be processed in accordance with PAP-0606 " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications".
6.2 Review / Documentation of EITIs 6.2.1 The Compliance Engineering Unit shall interface with the Nuclear Engineering Department (NED) to review and evaluate each EITI.
6.2.2 Each EITI shall be evaluated by NED to determine:
1.
If the item under review is:
- a. Safety Related,
- b. Augmented Safety Related, or
- c. Non-Safety Related.
2.
If the item under review is:
- a. Earthquake related,
- b. Indeterminate, or
- c. Non-earthquake related.
Note: Justification shall be provided for each non-earthquake related evaluation.
L
~
~
OM19A: GTI-0003 Page : 4
- _ Rev. : 2
- 3. If the disposition of the item requires:
a.
^-
An NR or WR, in.accordance with POP-1501,
" Identification and Control of Deficient ;
Items", or_ - j b.
No action, inciesting the, item is not a deficiency.
a i Note: Justtfication enall be provided for "no action" evaluations.
6.2.3' The Compliance Engineering Unit shall include the engineering disposition of the EITIs (as determined in i 6.2.2 above) in the applicable CR Investigation Summary.
6.2.4 .
The Technical Section PPTD, shall take measures to initiate the corrective action documents identified by the CR Investigation Summary. WRs generated as a result of this shall be processed in accordance with Section 6.4 of this instruction.
l 6.2.5 s The Corrective Action document shall include the disposition of tha item as determined by section 6.2.2 above.
6.2 5 The applicable Condition Report: (CR) documenting the seismic event shall include the disposition of each EITI. After GSE Technical review, the CR shall be reviewed by PORC and approved by the Managers'rPOQ/PPTD. The applicable CR shall be closed out when all EITIs are dispositioned in accordance with PAP-0606, " Condition Reports'and Immediate Notifications".
6.3 Review [documentationofNewWorkRequests 6.3.1 New Work Requests generated per PAP-0902, " Work Request System", shall be routed through'the PWC Reviev *eam prior.
to being converted into a Work' Order.
Note:
If requested by the Unit Supervisor, a Work Order may be immediately initiated for tracking purposes only. The Unit Supervisor shall ensure that the applicable Work Request contains the following statement:
" Work may not commence until the seismic 4
evaluation is completed in accordance with GTI-
~ 0003."
m The original Work Request shall then be routed as described below.
e f
o
f 9
OM19A: GTI-0003 P&ga : $
Rev. : 2 6.3.2 The PWC Review Team shall assign a number to the WR and enter it in their Seismic Review Tracking Log (Attachment No. 1). The number assigned shall be a two part number.
XXX - YYY XXX - Sequential Day of the year YYY - Sequential number for the day A brief description of the WR will be entered along with the WR number. r 6.3.3 The PWC Review Team will initially screen new WR's to identify those which describe a condition that could possibly have been caused by the earthquake. A "Y"(YES) or "N"(NO) will be entered in the Tracking Log to indicate results of the initial screening process. A conservative approach will be taken during the initial screening.
Conditions such as the following will be designated for further evaluation: "
- 1) Electrical anomalies
- 2) Instruments foynd out of calibration
- 3) Unexplained piping, tubing leaks
- 4) Building or structural abnormalities "
- 5) Hanger or Snubber abnormalities WR's that are not earthquake related will be released to the PWC for generation of a Work Order.
Note: Work Requests (WRs) generated as a result of Section 6.2 of this instruction need not be reviewed again by the PWC Review Team for earthquake applicability.
6.3.4 WR's initially identified as potentially earthquake related will be further evaluated by NED.
6.3.5 The evaluation discussed in 6.3.4 above will determine:
- 1. If the WR under review is
- a. Safety Related,
- b. Augmented Safety Related, or
- c. Non-Safety Related.
. . ~ 1
. I 6
l
.s l
OM19A: GTI-0003 PagD : 6 ] ,
Rsv. : 2 l l
l
- 2. If the WR under review iss i
- c. Earthquake related,
- b. Ir.determtnate, or * '
- c. Hon + earthquake relatad. !
Note: Justificption shall be provided for each non-earthquake related evaluation.
- 3. If the disposition of the WR requiras:
- a. An NR, in accordance with fop-1501, "Identifiestion and Control of Deficient Itemt", or
- b. No action, indicating the item is not a defleiency (in this case, the WR .should be canceled in acccrdance with PAP-0902, " Work Request System").
notec 3uetification shall be provided for "no action" eveltations.
6.346 F77!/p yOfiW6j sealbation results will be , documented on the EJaluation Form, Attachment 2. This foro shall he maintained with the Geismic Review Tracking Leg.
6,1.7 A hrief description of the ovaluation results will also be entered in the Seismic Review Tracking Leg. Non earthquake related and Non Safety Related WR's will be released for generation of a Wort Order.
6.3.8 If the Work itequest it identified as potentially earthquake related, the GSE Outage Planning Section shall be notified as soon as possible.
6.3.8 The NRC si,all be notified by the CSE Outage Planning Section of all potentially earthquake related conditions within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
6.4 Processing Work Requests 6.4.1 WRs which are eitber Non-Ssfety Pelated or non-earthquake related shall be released .to the PWC for Work Order processing in accordance with PAP-0905," Work Order Process".
6.4.2 All other WRs, shall be further processed by the PWC as follows: 1 1.
Attachment 3, Work Directions, is attached to the WR and sent to the work unit planners. .
b
. _ _ , - + -w ,.y-. -., ,. -+w ..
p , +-
OM19As GTI-OOO3 a - P&ga : 7 Rev. : 2
- 2. The Work Package is developed per PAP-0905," Work Order i Process" and Attachment 3.
3.
The Work Package is routed to the NRC representative for review. ,
r 4.
Once released by the NRC, the PWC will release the package to the field. !
I 6.5 Records i 6.5.1 ?
The following documents are generated by this procedure: !
Quality Assurance Records k Seismic Review Tracking Log -
Evaluation Form work Directions i
Ncn-Quality Records None i Records identification and disposition are accomplished in accordance with the Records Retention / Disposition Schedule
- (RR/DS) and handled in accordance with PAP-1701, " Records Management *. ,
7.0 Attachments 7.1 Attachment 1 - Seismic Review Tracking Log Form: CTI-0003-1 7.2 i Attachment 2 - Evaluation Form: GTI-0003-2 I 7.3 !
Attachment 3 - Work Directions Form GTI-0003-3 i
I l !
l e
- --+m,- y --m-,, -~ , - --,-r -,.yn ,a- , -a-m - e -ew=w m-
OM19A: GT2-0003 Page : 8
- Rev. 2 Attachment 1 Form: CTI-0003-1 i
n, _M. C'S ST m m (T/ul 3n33F DESCRIrafos i
CF WORK A8525T EM *t tvalhATICE OF *Tf.3* Ar.$P.
Em eg IN Coubes 2 e
1 i O
e G
S Y
1
. . _ , - _ - , - _ , - , . - . = , . _ . , . _ . , ._. . . _ _ _ , _ . _. ,,.,_--n.._,.,.__,n.,..n_- -.-.,, , , . , , , _ . - - _ . , _ , , . . , , - - _ - .
d OM19A: GTI-0003 Pcg3 9 Rev. : 2
~ Attachment 2 Form: GTI-0003-2 EVALUATION FORM Earthquake Evaluation of -
I I Work Request #
Engineering Report by Ext. 6090
) Time /Date l C7 Safety Related C7Non-Safety Related C1 Augmented Safety Related
[3 Earthquake Related C} Indeterminate C7 Non-Earthquake Related 1
C7 Talked to WR Originator C7 Talked to PPTD Engineer bl Field Inspection Comments:
k f
i
[
t l
4 6 k conclusions l
l
. I l
l
- i l
l
OM19A: GTI-000)
Page : 10
- Rev. : 2 Attachment 3 Form: GTI-0003-3 WR #
WORK DIRECTIONS The attached Work Request has been evaluated as Caused By or Potentially Caused By the January 31, 1986 earthquake. The following special controls are to be implemented:
- 1) Contact a Design Engineering representative to determine if special procedures or controls are necessary in preparing the Work Order.
Ed Christianson Roger Parker John Eppich Daryl Gaffney Tom Fetterman Jan Shingler 2)
Upon arrival at work area, record any additional unusual as-found conditions not described on W.R.
3)
- Prior to work in the field, route the work package by the NRC Resident Inspector for review and i
determination desired. of an NRC Hold Point in the W.O. is NRC Hold Point YES desired ? NO NRC Resident Inspector This Control Sheet is to be included as a part of the
, Work Order Package.
l
- 1 I
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _