ML20210T556
Text
l INFORgg10H OHLY OMIM:GTI-coeJ Page: 1 Rev.: 1 THE" CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATIONS MANUAL l
TDiPORARY INSTRUCTION
{
i l
TITLE:
Identifying and Evaluating January 31.
1986 Suspected Earthquake Damage
" TYPE OF INSTRUCTION: General Temporary EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION f!P[F4 REVISION:
1 DATE:
2/p//s DATE:
)
i DATE I
T.
Hicks /L. Hinson
.2!P/f6 Ga a GL a/e/G 55 ===
e ac uEET m No.:
94-3o J.J. WAi nRON 2/r/pt T R L Jin_w l-
.2/e/86
'mm:
% 6xW_h 24/m I
/ /
B605300676 860321
$?
.J HIATT86-91 PDR jd M
M
OM19A: GTI-0003 Paga : U Rev. :
1 Identifying and Evaluating January 31, 1986 Earthquake Related Damage GTI-0003 Table of Contents Section Title Page i
1.0 Purpose 1
2.0 Scope 1
3.0 Responsibility 1
4.0 References 2
t 5.0 Definitions 2
6.0 Details 2
4 6.1 General 6.2 2
l Review / Documentation of Earthquake 3
Inspection Team Items 6.3 Review / Documentation of New Work Requests 4
6.4 Processing Work Requests 5
i 7.0 Attachments 6
7.1 Attachment I-Seismic Review Tracking Log 7
Form: GTI-0003-1 7.2 - Evaluation Form: GTI-0003-2 8
7.3 - Work Directions Form: GTI-0003-3 9
e P
i OM19A CTI-0003 Page : (li Rev. : 1 10CFR50.59 Applicability Check Yes No Is there a change to the plant as described in the FSAR1 Reaeoa:
-Th's su,% n. -a dese e,r.2 Ata s
wna -2 sh. A;a-
-u L * + <n b /rs.r-l$arN AA ffL* e Ls ersa NA dm U Is there a change to a procedure / instruction as described in the FSAR7 Reason:
m usn-am Cy n < /. #dsw. m W As Aw w - entD s < J.~<s. A e, ~ r u e M ~ :_--.
-A-a/~Jin Is there a test or experiment not described in the FSAR?
i Reaeoa:
- o 7r"m u ru.- -
see afr1<<. <->
l _, ) S w ru, n-nn~ n-f Is there a change to the Technical Specifications?
A Cne.ts.
73 ' Tere.</* C/a,As.~ n far =J D
7 Answers to all questions are "No", no potential for an Unreview d Safety question exists, no further review required.
O ^=ever= to==e or =are s=estion= 1 "res" f=rther review required.
Prepared By:
Date:
2/r/d Reviewed By:
dA Date: 4k 6
l Approved By: [
a Date:
49 //)/
f l
SCOPE OF REVISION:
To clarify the review and evaluation process i
I
\\
OM19A: GTI-0003 P g3 : 1 Rev. :
1 1.0 Purpose To describe the process for the documentation, review and evaluation of (1) items identified during the plant inspections conducted immediately after the January 31, 1986 seismic event and (2) newly discovered items that may have resulted from the seismic event.
2.0 Scope In order to accurately document the impact of the January 31, 1986, seismic event at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, damage that may have resulted from the event must be identified and properly evaluated.
This instruction describes the process for reviewing and evaluating the system / structural engineering inspection team results identified immediately following the January 31, 1986, seismic event.
It is used in conjunction with PAP-0606 " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications" by documenting the items in the earthquake generated Condition Report Investigation Summary.
This instruction also describes the process for reviewing and evaluating new Work Requests to identify any damage which could have been caused by the earthquake and not identified in the inspection team results described above.
Any further w
documentation of plant system, structure and component (SSC) damage shall be through the generation of a Work Request.
3.0 Responsibilities 3.1 The GSE Technical Section shall review the disposition of Earthquake Inspection Team Items (EITIs) identified during the January 31, 1986, seismic event through the Condition Report He shall forward the condition Report dispositioning process.
these items to PORC for review.
3.2 The General Supervising Engineer, Outage Planning Section has the overall responsibility for Work Request review and evaluation, and for informing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of earthquake related damage.
3.3 The PWC Review Team is responsible for the review and initial screening of incoming Work Requests.
The Review Team.will identify plant or equipment damage which could have potentially resulted from the January 31, 1986 earthquake.
3.4 The Compliance Engineer shall coordinate the disposition of the EITIs with the appropriate onsite engineering organization for input into the Condition Report process.
OM19A: GTI-0003 Ptg) : 2 Rev. :
1 l
4.0 References 4.1 POP-1501," Identification and control of Deficient Items",
i 4.2 PAP-0502, " Preparation, Peview, Approval, Revision, and Cancellation of Administrative Procedures".
4.3 PAP-0606, " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications".
4.4 PAP-0902, " Work Request System".
4.5 PAP-0905, " Work Order Process".
4.6 Confirmatory Action Letter, (CAL-RIII-86-OlA), dated February 4, i
- 1986, t
5.0 Definitions 5.1 Earthquake Inspection Team Items (EITIs)
Items identified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the January 31, seismic event by the system / structure engineering inspection team and any others items deemed appropriate by the GSE Technical Section.
These items will be evaluated utilizing this instruction for
, applicability to established Corrective Action programs (e.g. Work Request, Nonconformance Report, etc).
5.2 Project Work Center (PWC) Review Team A review team composed of design and PWC engineers assigned to review new Work Requests. The personnel assigned to the review team include engineers with the following backgrounds:
Engineers who are trained and experienced in plant design features, system testing, operations and plant Technical Specifications.
An engineer experlenced in piping design and construction and in stress analysis.
An engineer experienced in building structural design and construction.
Engineers representing the electrical and mechanical disciplines who are experienced in plant design and construction.
l 6.0 Details 6.1 General 6.1.1 Nonconformance Reports (NRs) and Work Requests (WRs) shall
OM19At GTI-0003 P;g) : 3 Rev. :
1 be generated utilizing the criteria of POP-1501,
" Identification and Control of Deficient Itemt".
6.1.2 Initial disposition of EITIs will be tracked by the Compliance Engineering Unit and shall be incorporated into an appropriate Condition Report (CR) Investigation Summary.
6.1.3 All additional abnormal or unusual observations shall be initially documented by a Work Request. These items shall be reworked, repaired, adjusted, or otherwise disturbed not prior to review and disposition in accordance with this instruction.
6.1.4 Those conditions which may involve potentially reportable events or SSC OPERABILITY shall also be processed in accordance with PAP-0606 " Cendition Reports and Immediate Notifications".
6.2 Review / Documentation of EITIs 6.2.1 The Compliance Engineering Unit shall interface with the Nuclear Engineering Department (NED) to review and evaluate each EITI.
6.2.2 Each EITI shall be evaluated by NED to determine:
1.
If the item under review is:
1 4
a.
Safety Related, b.
Augmented Safety Related, or c.
Non-Safety Related.
i 2.
If the item under review ist a.
Earthquake related, b.
Indeterminate, or t
c.
Non-earthquake related.
Note: Justification shall be provided for each non-earthquake related evaluation 3.
If the disposition of the item requires a.
An NR or WR, in accordance with POP-1501," Identification and Control of Deficient Items", or b.
No action, indicating the item is not a i
deficiency
,n c-
OM19A: GTI-0003 Pcg>
4 Rev.
1 Note: Justification shall be provided for "no action" evaluations.
6.2.3 The Compliance Engineering Unit shall include the engineering disposition of the EITIs ( as determined in 6.2.2 above) in the applicable CR Investigation Summary.
6.2.4 The Technical Section PPTD, shall take measures to initiate the corrective action documents identified by the CR Investigation Summary. WRs generated as a result of this shall be processed in accordance with Section 6.4 of this instruction.
6.2.5 The Corrective Action document shall include the disposition of the item as determined by Section 6.2.2 above.
6.2.6 The applicable Condition Report (CR) documenting the seismic shall include the disposition of each EITI. After GSE event Technical review, the CR shall be reviewed by PORC and approved by the Managers PPOD/PPTD. The applicable CR shall be closed out when all EITIs are dispositioned in accordance with PAP-0606 " Condition Reports and Immediate Notifications".
6.3 Review / Documentation of New Work Requests 6.3.1 New Work Requests generated per PAP-0902, " Work Request System", shall be routed through the PWC Review Team prior to being converted into a Work Order.
Note:
This routing typically occurs as part of restraint coding.
6.3.2 The PWC Review Team shall assign a number to the WR and enter it in their Seismic Review Tracking Log (Attachment No. 1).
The number assigned shall be a two part number.
XXX - YYY XXX - Sequential Day of the year YYY - Sequential number for the day A brief description of the WR will be entered along with the WR number.
6.3.3 The PWC Review Team will initially screen new WR's to identify those which describe a condition that could possibly have been caused by the earthquake. A "Y"(YES) or "H"(NO) will be entered in the Tracking Log to indicate results of the initial screening process. A conservative 1
approach will be taken during the initial screening.
Conditions such as the following will be designated for
'1 further evaluation:
l l
l m
OM19A: GTI-0003 P ga : S Rev. :
1 1)
Electrical anomalies 2)
Instruments found out of calibration 3)
Unexplained piping, tubing leaks 4)
Building or structural abnormalities 5)
Hanger or Snubber abnormalities WR's that are not earthquake related will be released to the PWC for generation of a Work Order.
Note:
Work Requests (WRs) generated as a result of Section 6.2 of this instruction need not be reviewed again by the PWC Review Team for earthquake applicability.
6.3.4 WR's initially identified as potentially earthquake related will be further evaluated by NED.
6.3.5 The evaluation discussed in 6.3.4 above will determine:
1.
If the WR under review is:
a.
Safety Related, b.
Augmented Safety Related, or 8
c.
Non-Safety Related.
2.
If the WR under review is:
a.
Earthquake related, b.
Indeterminate, or c.
Non-earthquake related.
Note: Justification shall be provided for each non-t earthquake related evaluation 3.
If the disposition of the WR requires:
a.
An NR, in accordance with POP-1501," Identification and control of Deficient Items", or b.
No action, indicating the item is not a deficiency (in this case, the WR should be cancelled in accordance with PAP-0902,' Work Request System"),
j s
--n
OM19As GTI-0003 P:g) : 6 Rev. :
1 Note: Justification shall be provided for "no action" evaluations.
6.3.6 Engineering evaluation results will be documented on the Evaluation Form, Attachment 2.
This form shall be maintained with the Seismic Review Tracking Log.
6.3.7 A brief description of the evaluation results will also be entered in the Seismic Review Tracking Log.
Non earthquake related and Non Safety Related WR's will be released for generation of a Work Order.
6.3.8 If the Work Request is identified as potentially earthquake related, the GSE Outage Planning Section shall be notified as soon as possible.
6.3.8 The NRC shall be notified by the GSE Outage Planning Section of all potentially earthquake related conditions within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
6.4 Processing Work Requests 6.4.1 WRs which are either Non-Safety Related or non-earthquake related shall be released to the PWC for Work Order processing in accordance with PAP-0905," Work Order Process".
6.4.2 All other WRs, shall be further processed by the PWC as follows:
- 1., Work Directions, is attached to the WR and sent to the work unit planners.
2.
The Work Package is developed per PAP-0905 " Work Order Process" and Attachment 3.
3.
The Work Package is routed to the NRC representative for review.
4.
Once released by the NRC, the PWC will release the package to the field.
6.5 Records 6.5.1 The following documents are generated by this procedure:
Quality Assurance Records Seismic Review Tracking Log Evaluation Form Work Directions I
Non-Ouality Records
OM19At GTI-0003 Page : 1 Rev. :
1 Arrxewer L foam
- G1T-voc1-1 M. C'3D 31 ERTNIX (T/u) anIgF DESQtIFTION E% m EVALhATION or "Tu pur.
0F WORK 200UE37 E==s rs4 IN Couser 2 i
i 1
e 9
0 J
l
,l l
G
~
OM19A CTI-0003 Page : 1 Rev. :
1 Arrnawar 1 EVALUATION FORM pg gg,
.)
Earthquake Evaluation of Work Request #
Engineering Report by Ext. 6090 Time /Date O Safety Related O Non-Safety Related Q Augmented Safety Related 3
D Earthquake Related D Indeterminate D Non-Earthquake Related O Talked to WR Originator D Talked to PPTD Engineer Q Field Inspection Comments
==
Conclusions:==
I s
8
t.
OM19As 072-0003 Page se gsger new.
1 Pors: 972-0003-3 WR #
WORK DIRECTIONS The attached Work Request has been evaluated as Caused By or Potentially Caused By the January 31, 1986 earthquake. The following special controls are to be implemented:
1)
Contact a Design Engineering representative to determine if special procedures or controls are necessary in preparing the Work Order.
Ed Christianson Roger Parker John Eppich Daryl Gaffney Tom Fetterman Jan Shingler 2)
Upon arrival at work area, record any additional unusual as-found conditions not described on W.R.
3)
Prior to work in the field, route the work package by the NRC Resident Inspector for review and determination of an -
NRC Hold Point in the W.O. is desired.
NRC HOLD POINT YES desired ?
NO NRC Resident Inspector This Control Sheet is to be included as a part of the Work Order Package.
--