ML20210P591
| ML20210P591 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1982 |
| From: | Krechting J STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. |
| To: | Harold Denton, Engelken R, Maneatis G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209B723 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-151 DCS-194, NUDOCS 8702130424 | |
| Download: ML20210P591 (31) | |
Text
--
V.
e STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASS ACHU SETTS ADORESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. SOX 2325. SOSTON. M ASS. 02107 W U. TELEX; S4 000t NSTWWCTrON N
ORN
- " = " ' " " " -
" :?.""..N.
- L*.'T.
""' On".*N.
TLANO OREGON W A GNINGTO N. O.C.
i Mr. G.A. Maneatis, Senior Vice President December 10, 1982 Facilities Development J.O. No. 14296 Pacific Gas and Electric Company DCS-194 77 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94106 7
Mr. H.R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Mr. R.H. Engelken, Regional Administrator Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210
' Walnut Creek, CA 94956
' Mr. W.E. Cooper Teledyne Engineering Services
-130 Second Avenue Waltham, MA 02254 Docket No. 50-275 Diablo Canyon Unit 1 License No. DPR-76 SWEC DECEMBER SEMIMONTELY REPORT Centelmen:
Enclosed in numerical order are the Open Item Report forms (8062-8063) issued by SWEC since our last Semi =onthly Report.
Very truly yours,
~
jJ. r..
rechtin j Project Engineer, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Enclosures CC: /H. Schierling (2)
D.F. Fleischaker R. Fray J. Reynolds R. Reedy B. Norton E. Denison A.C. Gehr f
H.H. Brown 8702130424 870203 PDR FOIA HOLMESB6-151 PDR L
I.
OPEN ITEM REPORT File No. E0I-8063 0
Filo Revision N2.
1.
.0 ate reported to PG&E and TES 11/22/82 O 2.
Scheduled for SWEc (Originator)
Semimonthly Report No.
n.,...,%,.
'\\
/ 3.
Responsive to PG&E Technical Program:
Task (if applicaole) 4.
Prepared as a result of:
- a. O QA Audit and Review Report of
- b. O Field Inspection Deficiency
- c. O Independent Calculation Deficiency
- d. O Seismic Input Deficiency
- e. O Design Methodology Deficiency
- f. x Other Deficiency 5.
Structure (s), system (s) or component (s) involved:
Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Numbers 12 and 13 6.
Description of Concern:
The overcurrent protective relays are set at cap 4.0 amp to trip at 107 percent of motor full load current for both auxiliary feedwater pumps. The 107 percent r'elay setting was verified by field inspection.
7.
Significance of Concern:
If the auxiliary feedwater pumps are required to operate at their normal minimum voltage rating, which is ninety percent of the name plate rating the motors will be tripped by their overcurrent protective relays.
PG&E Memorandum dated Feb. 24, 1982 from E. H. Gove to Wallace Vahlstro-requests the tap settings on the Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps 12 and 13 overcurrent relays be changed from 4.0 amps to 4.5 amps, which would be 120 percent of motor full load rating.
l 8.
Reconinendation :
g e
/
s t.
n
/." ".
OPEN ITEM REPORT File No. E0I-8062 File Revision No.
o O.
1.
Data reported to PG&E and TES 11/18/82 1
2.
Scheduled for SWEC (Originator)
Semimenthly Report No. December 3.
Responsive to PG&E Tecnnical Program:
Task (if applicaole) 4.
Prepared as a result of:
- a. O QA Audit and Review Report of
- b. O Field Inspection Deficiency
- c. O Independent Calculation Deficiency
- d. O Seismic Input Deficiency
- e. El Design Methodology Deficiency f.
Other Deficiency 5.
Structure (s), system (s) or component (s) involved:
AN Control Vqives FCV 37, FCV 38 and FCV 95.
6.
Description of Concern:
The PG&E response to SWEC Document Request (140 stated FCV 37, FCV 38, and FCV 95 are designed to o. pen and close against a maximum differential pressure of 805 PSI per Purchase' Order 4R-8729B. These valves could be required to operate against a differential pressure in excess of 1100 PSI. As an example FCV 95 must open during conditions where steam generator safety valves are lifting. FCV 37 or FCV 38 could be required to close in the event of a steam line break with steam generator safety valves lifting.
7.
Significance of Cone.arn:
The valve 6perators to FCV 37, FCV 38 or FCV 95 may not function under conditions where differe-e.ial pressure exceeds 805 PSI.
8.
Recornnendation :
PC&E should evaluate the operators ability to position the valves against the calculated maximum differential pressure against which the valves must function. Supporting documentation should be sent to SWEC for independent verification.
\\.
n O *f M.
a 9.
Signature:,ttfu C-
/
_ (Crig inator/0egani:stie:n;
h.&*
^
ect.T t, uo (H%?%
.L.
P Dia 2.0 Canyon Proj.
tt hc ;w xce,r+
gDNL s
' PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION UNCONTROLLED' COPY
- y. g g g g -
JW DCVP-TES-G9-6 4 7 Y
)fi9 (c
Dr.
',1. E. Cooper TES Document Control ggC 3 g 1982 Project 5511 Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue T;ledyne Engineering Services
'laltham, itA 02254
Subject:
Seismic Analysis of the Containment Annulus St'ructure REFEREliCE:
(a) Decembar 2,1932 !! eating 'faitham, liA.
~
Dear Dr. Cooper:
At the Decemoer 2, 1932 IDVP/DCP lteeting (Reference a),'the DCP committed to reviaw the licensing criteria for the Containment Annulus Structure and to c
provide a synopsis of the criteria, lie have completed our review and the attachment to this letter provides the basis for the critaria that wera applicable to tha annulus structure tiith some additional commentary.
lie believe this action comple'tes the Diablo Canyon Project commitments of our December 2 meeting, and should enable the IDVP to agree in principle to our proposals for resolution of the E01s pertinent to this issue.
If you have comments or questions please contact us.
Sincerely,
~
A G. !!.toore Project Engineer, Unit flo.1
'T.ulhi te/RSC : sk f
'to uritten reply requested.
Attachment:
Saismic Analysis of the Containment Structrue P O 80x iM5
- SA A' f RANCISCO, CAttron.ps. cat t.o 1333A:SKF
009617
$,k.,d s
Diablo CanyonProject PACIFIC GAS AND El.ECTRIC COMPANY BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION January 10, 1983 DCVP-TES-690
~
s.,
f(( y[ }r -
y Dr. W. E. Cooper h,fr 4 L TES Document Control Project 5511 Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue Waltham, !% 02254 IDVP/DCP lieeting,7Januafs4633 Boston, MA
SUBJECT:
Dear Dr. Cooper:
Attached are the meeting notes for the subject meeting. These notes are intended only to provide the significant concerns / conclusions / actions as Technical details for cach of the E01s discussed at expressed at the meeting.
A the meeting can be obtained from the appropriate E0I file documentation.
summary of the meeting in tabulation form is also provided for information.
If there are any comments on these meeting notes, please inform us.
Very truly yours, G. H. !!00RE Project Engincar, Unit 1 W
/
i By:
R. R. Troy #
R50 ahn: s', i he written reply requ sted
Attachment:
tteeting t;otes fC cc:
F. Sestak (S C ) w/a l'
r c.cc,.v.c.:e. c a. ce n,* 3 ;,.:: t v.: :. m 1546 A:SP.F
009617 IDVP)DCPHeating
?
Subject:
PhaseIISNEC.E0!s Date:
January 4 and 5,*.1983 1.ocation:
SWEC offices,'? Boston, MA Organizations:
IDVP (TES & SWEC). DCP & NRC Attendees:
See attached list Conclusions / Concerns / Action Items January 4, 1983 E01-8045 Diesel Generator Circuit Separation
==
Conclusion:==
Design meets single failure criteria.
Action:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file.
ECD (estimated completion date) - 1/20/83 E01-8041 CRVP Power Transfer Separation
==
Conclusion:==
Design meets single failure criteria.
Action:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file.
ECD - 1/20/83 E01-8042 AFWS & CRYP 120 VAC Source Separation conclusion: Design meets single failure criteria.
Action:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file.
E01-804G CRVP Fans (Power and Control Circuit Supplies)
Concerns:
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
. Actions:
- 1) DCP will provide information that battery capacity is sufficient to meet design operating duration of the CRYP fans.
(Note: To be done by reference to single line diagrams and other documentation).
- 2) IDVP to complete resolution of the E01 file.
- 3) Specific concern with availability of Unit 4 pn.cr supply to be transferred to CCI-30!2 E0*-M17 W.' A'. ;on.rul Power Oepration Concerns:
D;P does not believe this is a generi: 1s:ue W.k5 requires additional verific tion. 1:45 A:5V
000S17
.m Conclusien:
SWEC concurs with conceptual modification proposed.
Actions:
- 1) DCP to provide revised resolution sheet which will provide necessary engineering documentation of resolution.
ECD'- 2/15/83
- 2) DCP to provide completion sheet (upon completion of modification). ECD - 3/15/83 E01-8013 Diesel Generator Loading Actions: DCP to provide
- 1) Basis for Brake HP ratings.
- 2) Revised loading tables to provide consistency with regard to items noted by SWEC a) Locked rotor power factors b) Terminal voltage drops caused by starting motor with prior running loads.
- 3) Statement regarding capability for timers to properly sequence loads.
- 4) Statement that motor acceleration is within designated time interval.
E01-8044 AFWS Cable Splices in Control Circuits Actions:
- 1) IDVP to provide file revision to reficct latest concerns (i.e. location and qualification of other spifces).
E01-8011 Cable Environmental Qualification Actions:
- 1) DCP to provide revise.d completion sheet to this E01 file.
ECD - 1/30/83 Completion she'et to include:
- 1) Identification of type of cable used.
- 2) Qualification test reports for these cables.
s E01-8047 Relay 3t#WP - S.G. Bloudown Valve Closure _
Actions:
- 1) DCP to clarify that response addresses transient conditions, e.g. loss of feeduster, by submittal of revised completion sheet.
- 2) IDVP to review DCP response and to complete resolution of the E0: file.
- "/.' 0- d..e..r_" m..,:
-. _ _ g classified.
4 t i:r.::
- 1) The pari s 11 p.,, vide a coV et ion sheet to thi: E3*.
E:D - 2.15/52 (peMing c nfim3 tion)
! H ia $.r L
- ~
009S17
- 2) DCP to provide information as to why this item is not a significant safety item.
i E01-8019 AFW Pump Equipment in' Comon Fire Zone concern:
- 1) The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on this E01 file.
Actions:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file. The DCP to supply specific listing of remaining circuits in conduit k8317 and present FCV-95 control and powar cable routing.
1 E01-8038 Fire Zone Comunication (3-0-2 to 3-R)
Concerns:
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
- 2) The DCP does not believe that additional verification l
is required based on this E01 file.
Action:
IDVP to review DCP response and to complete resolution of the E01 file.
l E01-8039 Fire Zone Comunication (12-A, 8, C, to 13-A, _B, C)_
3ame concerns and actions as EDI-8038. -
E01-8001 NSC Environments - P/T Analysis conclusion:
DCP agrees with IDVP concern and is redoing HELB i
analysis outside of containment.
Actions:
- 1) Reanalysis of areas GE & GW and turbine butiding and report of reanalysis results to be provided by DCP.
ECD - 1/30/83
E01-8002 NSC Hass/ Energy - Additional Breaks Concerns:
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
Actions:
- 1) D"P to provide revised c;;;1cti:n :h::t f:r t!.i: f!!t.
ECO 1/.00 '83 (Sr,.letim : Feet v411 c m ido refe~ r e to li:euing aucumnu*. ion uicii,is... '
N J : *.
position).
- 2) IDVP to con:ider re:lassifiestfon and tv close tlis TG:
file be:ausa of ru nalysis being perfsrre tri rea::nie to E01 6001.
3 l
,1545A:SKF
r c..
009S17
~
E0!-8003 NSC Bloudown Enthalsy Concerns:
The DC) believes that this item should be classified no higher than an Error C because the effect of the non conservative enthalpy is not significant.
==
Conclusion:==
DCP agreed that a more conservative value of enthalpy could have been used.
Actions:
- 1) The DCP will provide a revised completion sheet for this file, and will use a new value of enthalpy in the I
reanalysis.
- 2) IDVP to consider reclassification and to close this E01 file becuase of reanalysis being p'erformed in response to E01 8001.
E01-8004 NSC Initial Temperature Concerns: 1) The DCP believes that this E0I is not properly classified.
Actions:
- 1) The DCP will provide a revised completion sheet for this file. ECD - 1/20/83 (Completion sheet will provide reference to licensing documentation which justifies Project position).
- 2) IDVP to consider reclassification and to close this E01 file because of the reanalysis being performed in response to E01 8001.
E01-8006 NSC Docunentation
==
Conclusions:==
This EDI file should be closed and closure should reference E01-8001.
Actions:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file.
ECD -
1/20/83 E01-8033 HEL8 S.G. Slowdown tiethods Concerns:
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
Conclu:fon: This E0! is closely linked to E0I-0002 and should be resolved by the reanalysis discussed in E0! S00! using nw mus and evergy relene data.
?? te prot!de cemt :t f:n sMet f:- t6i! 'ite.
FS -
'v.i:P::
1:
1/20/S3
- 2) 1DVP to consider releassifi:stion and to close this E01 file be: use of the rc:9slysi: being nperforrad in response to E01 c001.
4 04M:37
+
009817 E01-8034 HELB Node Modeling The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly Concerns:
classifed.
==
Conclusion:==
A multi-node model will be used in the reanalysis discussed in E01-3001.
Actions:
DCP will provide completion sheet for this file. ECO -
1/30/83 (Completion sheet will provide basis for Project's concern with classification).
s
.y 9
e D
Ol
~
ii*t':SKF
009817 January 5, 1983 E01-8005 Flooding Analysis C'oncerns:
The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on this E01 file.
Actions:
DCP to provide a revised completion sheet to-this E01 (ECD'-1/20)
(Completion sheet will provide reformated flooding calculation which o*
will prove that the effect of the water used in the design is conservative.)
E01-8040 Flooding Analysis (Related to E01 8005)
Concerns:
- 1) The DCP believes this EDI is not properly classified.
- 2) The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on this E01 file.
Actions:
DCP to provide a revised completion sheet to this EDI (ECD-1/20) (See E01-8005 actions)
E01s-8028, 8029, & 8030 HELS effects
==
Conclusion:==
Technical agreement that no pipe cracks need to be postulated on Ifne 760 based on DCP l
licensing criteria and operating procedures.
Concerns:
The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on these E01 files.
Actions:
- 1) The DCP to provide revised completion sheets to these E01 files. ECD - 1/20/33 (Completion sheets will indicate the specific changes to the specific licensing document in accordance with normal licensing ).
documentation updating procedures ECD -
1/20/83
- 2) The DCP e.o assist in preparing an interprau tion of the ICVP Pha:c !! P :;ra:
Management Plan with regards to ci'.in) iicon:in3 c :umentation changes.
E01-8031 HELB Effects on AFW5 LCV 113 & 115 Concerns:
ine O!F coes not pelieve that additi:nal verification is required based on this E01 f11e.
l.
i
!M?A'010?A:SKF L
e-009S17 Actions:
The DCP to provide revised completion sheet to this E01. ECD - 1/20/83 (Indication of licensing document change - see E0!s 8028, 29, and 30)
E01-8049 Pipe Break in Line 594
==
Conclusion:==
Technical agreement reached that conduit in question is not damaged by the jet from postulated break.
Action:
The DCP to provide revised completion sheet to this E01 file.
ECD - 1/20/83 (Indication l
of licensing document change which reflects change in DCP methodology for calculating jet enve' ope temperatures).
E01-8014 AFWS Valve Shielding concerns:
- 1) The DCP believes that this E0I is not properly classified.
- 2) The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on this E01 file.
Actions:
The DCP to provide revised completion sheets l
to this E01 file.
(This completion sheet will indicate that licensing change will be made. For this E01 the licensing change may be made in a letter to the NRC rather than a change to a licensing document)
E0!-8015 AFW Pump Flow tieasurement concerns:
The DCP balteves that this E0I is not properly classified.
Actions:
- 1) The IDVP will reclassify this E01 to an open item with DCP action.
- 2) The DCP yill provide revised completion sheet to this E01 file.
EGI-M:7 A"W Stoso Try. M.ign Ch:nge con:Idilon:
Mid51:TITreamc9t on resolution was reach +d.
1 Concern The D"P does not belicva tnat ac41ttonal verification is required based on this E01 file.
.g.
101M/0100A:St:r
a
(
i,"
009817 e
Action:
IDVP to complete resolution of this E01 file ECD-1/20/83 t.
L NOTE:
IDVP indicated that R. F. Reedy program may satisfy their potential engineering documentation concerns raised by this E01 l
i E0!-8048 AFW Hose Station Design Change conclusion:
Technical agreement on resolution was reached.
~#-,
~.
l
~
Concern:
The DCP does not believe that additional verification is required based on this E0!
file.
Action:
IDVP to complete resolution of the E0! file ECD-1/20/83 MOTE:
IDVP. indicated that R. F. Reedy program may satisfy their potential engineering documentation concerns raised by this E01.
l E0!-8036 Hydronen Line Enclosures conclus'on:
Agreement on resolution was reached The !DVP to consider changing the,d to l
Actions:
classification of this E01 file an l
complete resolution t
E0!-8032 Loss of control of LCV110, 111, 113 and 115 conclusion:
Agreement on resolution was reached.
Concern:
The DCP believes this E01 is not properly l
classified and should be an Error C,.
Actions:
- 1) The IDVP to change classification of this E01 l
file.
l
- 2) The DCP to provide completion sheet to E01 file when modification is made.
E0! 8051 aft lS-PT-437 Classif_ication Lanciuston:
Icennical agreement on resolutf ar, was tv. hr d hvide revi:cd crolction thet The OOP to t(indicat N. of "i c:in; La..t Actian:
to thl!, E01 change) l l
3 1519 A'0169 A:5KF
[
b.7 E01-8052 AFW Systeu Class 1E Environmental Qualification Action:
IDVP to review classtfication and to complete resolution of this E01 file.
E01-8053 Radiation Monitor Classification conclusion:
Technical agreement on resolution was reached.
Action:
The DCP to provide revised completion sheet to this E01 (indication of licensing document change).
E01-8060 AFW Pump Flow limiting Control Actions:
- 1) IDVP to review completion sheet provided at meeting.
could address AFW system stability concern.
E01-8021 AFWS Fire Protection Separation Concerns:
1)
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
- 2) The IDVP believes that a co)y of the Draft Fire Protection Reanalysis will 1elp them to verify that adequate separation.is provided for AFWS cables.
rovide revised completion sheet to this E01 The DCP to p/30/83 (Completion sheet will oudress Action:
file. ECD-1 concern as to why Table 4 of $1FPR does not always reflect as-built conditions) 1 E01-8061 Motor Starting Capability-80% Voltage concerns:
The DCP believes that this E01 is not properly classified.
Action:
The IDVP to reissue this E01 as an open item for DCP i.
action. Revised E0! to clearly state IDVP concerns.
i E01-8043 AFWS Power Supply Separation Action:
The DC) to provido completion shoet to this E0I.
E01-8034 AFWG Cablo Codino and Separation Action:
The D;P to provide complation sheet to this E01.
ISI ECT7 "utt :.1 hnel Sesacati:n Action:
THe CP~to provide complation snce. f:r tnn, iv. t ;!c which addresses the spe:ific separation eumples given by the 10VP.
ECD - 2/15/83 t
4 1519A/0159A:5vF
009517 E01-8059 Class 1E Circuit Separation Actions:
The I)VP to provide specific examples which identify the concerns raised by this E0!.
ECD 1/11/83 E0!-8055 AFW Pump Disch. Press Indication Separation The DCP believes that this E0! is not concern:
properly classified.
The DCP to p(rovide a completion sheet to this Actions:
E0! file.
indication of licensing document change)
E0!-8007 and E01-8003 Pipe Restraint t.ocations T1ese E01s were discussed just to provide NOTE:-
clarification of concern.
Action:
The DCP to provide completion sheets.
E0!-8009 A$5 Discharge Piping Design Pressure Action:
The IDVP to review DCP resolution.
E0! 8010 AFd Turbine 8 earing Coolers -
Action:
The IDVP to review DCP resolution.
S em
,5-
!!MA ':!GM:9:r
')/ h b
,' '. ' D (y198j7 r>l..
//# t :y,A.?,y,
,4ep.7-
--.---.._..c..J h =
fmf'.::. 4/',..f..l.
bit N s 11. L fi %.q s. H z.i s J fr R. A N._.A. __ S..W...e.JS e,0 5 u)EC,
- 5. P_Am...c..e.__Seg.te. AX.
5.NEc.
3 0 Ht5 O.~O..D. a.
3.%3t'
?HH'cs.E.7Aa1oe t*W5 c
~~*6t'ut' ) 0 M s W/ 4 5a/E
.E. clV's. r.1-.Y~ e o, ele sn -
S W J..C..
f 2,dt/k d /Pr.es.'M Crs._
S h' 4---
B aeme hd cc:,
E.u./ e.c -
R, L. Adh y 244_(&np< Spc-6.(0g'
+
. oWARQ _/g/i=.7@
i,
-:N 1.t._/w;.h&5.c:c.<'
h
$c M ---
. N.. _.b...
06.@__
$6f f RG$...W644'Y 9 t i.
- D C F - - - - -- - - - -
. 1_C C.s'!vg.1-L 41-r
.... T'
- L-I e,,. 1. s c....... -
.._.. _. _ b...e p.
-r" e -~~
. C5)r*a c e f.r ~'.. b <,, i hh OcP J.:. : ':..: r. 4'sik: ?....
- c.=
.. C. '..
... M 'e.:.~.> 'v d' = s.: u-~..,
& <. a.t D. 3 :.a.:W
- e.
?$$
u,; ( I ',* /
eslJ J c. rt
} C I"'
i s n.c.,
(,s
(. l ms 74
... r
pi.,9817 sya c
.y pi a
>.s
- . t,,,,.
i.
k s e ;;.c.
Jsv TSS pew snedrowy.
ras 10&
Co oya
-rdr
% 1 s te\\W 5 W dc
.Cble Grsvu S w.s.c-C /Hn e t a s Y ~ 2 r e s s'es o swec Sbt/ph. sh'tr4r-
[4 >ac K.
Kuuxxaun s u s e.
RS Qvwee.s.
S um tr :r CTAcqos s Soc c,
$O J
l8k)
W D,ay w i on ou ssv Dcf 5.w E c
,,. au
..n.<
Quie.
xsiggc &
SWC-c, h %'
MAbA,%5Fr4 Mvhal F. L e.gc Psac lss Sc'a:a h WR.c y
w Lawos t:c e W. ' G. h.x o u c_.sj s va,=_.e R. A. Y e v.a c.
OcP 4 C 40 2/24.c 75~S
Oi.*9617 Sur. nary of Phase !! E01s Discussad at IDVP/DCP lleeting Jan. 4/5, Boston 48 Total number of E0!s discussed -
==
7 1.
Concurrence reached, ready for' closure -
2.
!DVP Action Required -
11 a.
Resolution appears close-6 b.
Further review / discussion may be required-
.1.
11 3.
DCP Action Required -
30 a.
Resolution appears close -
23 Paperwork only -
20 tiodifications-
__1_.
23 b.'
Further review / discussion may be required-7%
W Totals Resolved 7
Close to Resolution 29 Additional Review 12W 1515?:$Kr
7-o ot.ic.sn
.o,
'l' 15Uf41ARY OF E01'S DISCUSSCO AT JANUKRT4 r T91D2TfDif DTTOTTON_
.q,3,-
Concurrence /-
. IDVP DCP Action' Further Discussion Resolved Action Paperwork Modification _
Required 8045 8019 8046 8017 8002 8041 8038' 8013 8032 8004 8042 8039 8011 8035 8034 8006 8052 8051*
8009 8027 8044 8001 8010 8048 8047 8003 8040 8015;l 8028*
8015
((08059'l 8036 8061 )
8029*
8060 8030*
8021 8031*
8057 08009'll I!8010l 8049*
8059 8014*
8061 8033 (8034) 8005 8055*
(8057) 804}
8054 8002 >
8004 l 8040 l 8053*
(8021)
(8060) 8007 8008 TOTALS Z
(fjl
{Qf[l
}
j{
LEGE.Q
- Licensin;/T;/,R Fix (x)-ItemRequiresDiscussionfor Further Resolution
recvl Q6 r:
38 % I.fgq.
iureRomCeueuoRAnouu -
Diablo CanyonProject t,
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION To Management Team o*
January 25, 1983 p ro.a B. S. Lew F le No.
of Licensing s4.ci Status of Responses to BfL ai 45/23/D34 c.i.n.on2-2683 This memo documents the status of responses to BfL information requests.'
N As a result of meetings in October and December of 1982, BfL has identified various information needs.
The information request from the October meeting has been formally identified in the fiRC letter dated Decerter 1,1982 (Attachment 1).
The information request from the December meeting has been provided informally to the Project (Attachment 2) but we are still awaiting the formal request from flRC.
In addition, on January 13, the fiRC and Brit requested additional information to clarify information previously submitted (Attachment 3).
In response to tilese requests, the Project has provided structural and piping analyses packages to Blit in submittals dated December 10 and 17,1982 and January 4,1983, as well as informtion provided during the December meeting, liost of the requested information has been included in these packages. The information which rcmains to be submitted is listed below:
1.
Structural drawings showing modifications to the annulus due to DE and DDE.
2.
PG&E analysis results for piping problems 8-116, 8-117, and 8-118.
3.
DCP's review of the drawing list on pages 16-17 of i(VREG/CR-2834 to insure they are the latest revisions; if not, up-to-date information to be provided.
4.
How are Class 1, 2, and 3 evaluations implemented in itE 101 and liestd>Ti computer codes? fleed clarifications for input and output statements used in both codes.
g j
, 5.
Require' individual support excitation spectra for. all pipin~g problems (furnished to BNL) in both the vertical and horizontal directions.
6.
Support by suppor[tiseismic anchor movements for piping sys tems.
7.
Notification of. changes wil'l be given to BNL as soon _as they are available.
In addition, of the information already submitted, BNL has raised the following questions (non-technical). A formal request for clarifications to these questions is. forthcoming.
1.
Drawings 437985 and 446484[ 0nly reduced copies were provided and are not completely legible. BNL needs full size drawings (for piping problems 6-4 and 6-7).
2.
A list of coordinates for all nodes in piping problems 6-4 and 6-7.
3.
A sumary of nodal connectivity for piping problems 6-4 and 6-7.
~
(All three items would be satisfied if full size drawings for 2
these problems were provided including the node locations.)
4.
A printout of steam generator weight distribution data. A copy was provided that is not completely legible.
The status of the above remaining 11 items is indicated on Attachment 4.
The Project has committed to update, as appropriate, the information which has been provided to BNL.
It is also expected that the Project will need to hold further discussions with BNL to confirm that the structural and piping information is consistent with eac_h other. Accordingly, Licensing is continuing to request, through the NRC, that BNL conduct discussions with the Project ~ through either meetings or telephone. conversations. Licensing will apprise the Project of any developments.
Barclay S. Lew Response Required:
No DS/BSL/ckk Attachments t
cc: Management Team D.W. Ogden P. A. Crane B. Sarkar R.R. Fray D. Sokolsky l
P. Hirschberg M.R. Tresler l
R.F. Locke W.H. White G.H. Moore G.C. Wu B. Norton y
v.
yqv-
.w i
.,--,e m--
.e-e---ew.---ww
+ - ~
w4--%r--=r-
+
Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power P ant Request for Structural Drawings Submitted 438232 Interior Concrete Outline Plans at El 74'-8" & 9'0" Rev. 10 Yes Containment Structure
'438233, Interior Concrete Outline Plans at El 124'-0" Rev. 12 Yes
& 140'-0" Containment Structure 438234 Interior Concrete Outline-Main Sections Containment Rev. 12 Yes Structure 438235 Interior Concrete Outline Miscellaneous Sections Rev. 6 Yes Containment Structure 438239 Interior Concrete Reinforcing Slab at El 91'-0" Rev. 5 Yes North Containment Structure Area F 438240 Interior Concrete Reinforcing Slab at Rev. 6 Yes*
El 91'-0" South Containment Structure Area G 438274 Interior Concrete Details Reactor Nozzles Rev. 4 Yes Area Containment Structure 438276 Detailed Plans at El ill of Steam Generator Rev. 7 Yes Supports Containment Structure 438278 Reactor Coolant Pump Supports at El 106 Rev. 5 Yes Containment Structure 438280 Pressurizer Support Containment Structure Area F Rev. 4 Yes 439571 Equipment Supports Plan Below El 113 Containment Rev. 8 Yes Structure Areas F & G 439572 Layout of Lateral Support for Steam Rev. 2 Yes Generators at El 139'-0" Containment Structure Areas F & G 439573 Steam Generator Support at El 139'-0" Rev. 6 Yes Containment Structure Areas F & G f.
438135 Requirement for 40,000 Gal. Diesel Fuel Rev. 6 Yes 011 Storage Tanks
- Re'v.5 was transmitted _
9 02841/0006T
Request for Other Material Needed for Structural Analysis Submitted 1.
Equipment mass data similar to that attached to PG&E Yes letter to J. Blume dated September 13,.1982.
Ref.
Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Containment Structure.
2.
Geotechnical Studies' Intake Structure, Water Storage Yes Tanks, Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks, Otablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, San Luis Obispo County Conf., HLA Job No. 569,031.04, ' Harding-Lawson Associates, April 12, 1978.
3.
Letter report from Harding Lawson dated October 11, Yes 1982 updating the above (2) reports.
4.
7175360 51 Series Vertical Steam Generator Outline Yes Sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 Bechtel f's DC-663206-27-1 and DC-663206-1-10 5.
The following sections are required for the polar Yes crane:
(a) through the horizontal girders (b) at the top of the columns (c) at the bottom of the columns 6.
The horizontal Newmark Hosgri 7.5 M digitized time Yes history for the Reactor Containment Building (cards plus printed copy of cards).
7.
The horizontal surface Newmark Hosgri 7.5 H digitized Yes time history for the buried diesel oil tank (cards plus card listing).
l 1 j 02841/0006T
E
~
Request for Other Material Needed for Structural Analysis (C on t ' d'. )
Submitted 8.
Latest sketches and/or drawings of modifications to No*
the connections of the annulus structural steel.
9.
Total weigfit and weight distribution of the steam Yes**
generators.
~
January.
s
- A copy was provided that was not completely legible. 4 02841/0006T
Items Needed for Piping Analysis Submitted A PG&E pip'ing document package, or its equivalent, and computer-input-output listings are requested for each of the following Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 piping problems:
A)
Yes B) 6-102 (6-11)
Yes C) 8-116, 8-117, 8-118 No D) Westinghouse Problem RHR Loop 4 (6-4, 6-7)
Yes The document packages to include at least:
1.
Walkdown isometric Yes 2.
Hosgri envelope spectra Yes 3.
Thermal and pressure operating modes from DCM-M-46 Yes 4.
Building displacements from DCM C-28 Yes 5.
Pipe specification and material data Yes 6.
Support descriptions Yes 7.
Equipment movements if appropriate Yes 8.
Applied spring forces if appropriate Yes 9.
List of data preliminary in nature and subject to change Yes Please note the data requests for Problem No. 4A-122 and 6-102 will be used to update the BNL calculations for Problem No. 4A-26 and. 6-11. The data requests for Problem 1-10 and the RHR Loop 4 will be used to perform two new confirmation piping evaluations as per SECY-82-414.
Items Needed for Piping Analysis (Cont'd.)
Submitted In addition, the following general information is requested:
1.
Piping Reverification Analysis Log Yes 2.
Westinghouse Piping Analysis List Yes 3.
Stress Cocbination and Criteria DCl-1 M-42 Yes 4.
ME 101 Computer Code Manual Yes O
e 6
4 f
. 02841/0006T
-r
~'
~
Request for Structural Material Submitted 1.
The "as-built" Young's Modulus of the concrete in the -
Yes crane wall and -interior concrete.
It is understood that this information is in the DCP Phase I Report Section 2.1.
2.
DCP will mark up the annular steel " Design Change
.Tes - N 5 Sketches" to indicate what is new.
3.
DCP to review the drawing list on pages 16-17 of Yes NUREG/CR-2834 to insure they are the latest revisions; if not, up-to-date information to be provided.
4.
It is understood the DCP is making changes to annular Yes*
steel. They will transmit such change as they become available.
5.
Reinforcing details of the' connection between the El 140' Yes ar!nular slab to the crane wall.
6.
Wbstinghouse will supply information on the weight Yes d'istribution of the steam generators along their vertical axis.
If available, they will also transmit a stick model showing the masses geometry and stiffnesses.
i 7.
Kow are Class 1, 2, and 3 evaluations. implemented in itE No
'01 and Westdyn computer codes? Need clarifications for input and output statements used in both codes.
5 l
8.
Require individual support excitation! spectra for all No piping problems in both the vertical nd horizontal directions.
i F
O j 0284i/0006T
2 Request for Structural Material (Cont'd.)
Submitted 9.
Support by support seismic anchor movements for No piping systems.
.10. Notification of change-s will be Yes*
given to BNL as soon as they are made.
- Continuing 6
1 I
'l
' '02841/0006T
cc: Einzigownt Te:nn RRFray Attach. 3 g ehberg M
.. g -
DIABLO CANYON PROJECT QNoore
' dJ, TELEPHONE markar i
CALLS i =DSokolsky ll rester FILE DATE FROM g, C, gg OF 1.iCenSing 026.14 1/14/83 JOB NO.
TIME
'3 Harold Polk oF g ITEMS OF DISCUSSION ACTION RED *D. (INCLUDE NAMES & OATES)
Subject:
BNL Infounation Package of 1/4/83 Harold said he talked to ENL on January 13 to see wnether they had any questions on the ccntents or our January 4 submittals.
ENL has not had a chance to completely look tnrougn ene piping intonnation.
umy did not have any technical questions, but had problems with legibility of drawings Specifically, they requested the following:
1.
For drawings 437985 and 446484, only reduced (Not submitted) copies were provided. They need full size drawings.
2.
They need a list of coordinates for all nodes (Not Submitted) in the piping problens 6-4 and 6-7.
3.
They need a sunmar,/ of nodal connectivity (Not Submitted) for these problens.
l l
However. all three items would be satisfied if full l
size drawings for these problems were provided including the node locatans.
i l
I said I would check these and provide a response as soon a.s possible. Harold will include these itens in l
the NRC letter fonnally requesting information (resulting frcxn the 12/21/82 meeting).
In addition. Harold said they had problems reading the (Not Submitted) l tables of numbers in the Westinghouse problem package (carticularly pages 3-5). They would like to receive a better copy.
I said this information would be included along with the above infouration when we submit than.
OCW:IS I
I E,1003811 i
o
- i Status of Remaining Items 1.
Structural drawings showing modifications to the annulus due to DE and[
~
DDE -( Attachment 2, Page 1 Item 8).
Project committed to a submittal date of mid-January,1983.
Structural group indicates the ' submittal will be ready before the end of January.
-L- $ }
+
2.~
PG&E analysis results for piping problems 8-116, 8-117, and 8-118 (Attachment 2, Page 3, Item C).
Project committed originally to a submittal date by the end of 1982, and has postponed this date. Piping group expects to have the material ready by January 21, 1983.
3.
DCP to review the drawing list on pages 16-17 of NUREG/CR-2834 to insure they are the latest revisions (Attachment 2, Item 3).
The drawings listed on page 16 are up-to-date. The drawings on page 17 are not up-to-date. However, in lieu of updating the drawings, DCP will transmit by January 31 sufficient information to replace the information transmitted in the drawings.
4.
How are Class 1, 2, and 3 evaluations implemented in ME 101 and Westdyn computer codes? Need clarifications for input and output statements used in both codes (Attachment 2, Page 1, Item 7).
5.
Require individual support excitation spectra for all piping problems (furnished to BNI.) in both the vertical and horizontal directions
-(Attachment 2, Page 1, Item 8).
1 02841/0006T
.js Status of Remaining Items (cont'd.)
6.
Support by support seismic anchor movements for piping systems
'(Attachment 2, Page 1 Item 9).
Items 4, 5 and 6 are under preparation by the Piping group and should be ready by the end of January.
7.
Notification of changes will be given to BNL as soon as they are available.
This is a continuing request.
8.
Drawings 437985 and 446484, full size (Attachment 3, Item 1).
9.
A list of coordinates for all nodes in piping problems 6-4 and 6-7
( Attachment 3, Item 2).
- 10. A summary of nodal connectivity for piping problems 6-4 and 6-7
( Attachment 3, Item 3).
- Items 8, 9, and 10 wou!d be satisfied if full size drawings (437985 and 446484) for these problems were provided including the node locations. The Piping group is preparing the full size drawings to include such node locations. This package should be ready by January 21, 1983.
- 11. A printout of steam generator weight distribution data (Attachment 2, Page 2, Item 9).
t
- The infor.;iation is maintained by Westinghouse, which previously supplied it to the Mechanical group. This material should be ready by January 21, 1983.
' 02841/0006T
^
k,';'
~o
. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
,LAdministrative Judges:*
IS
.g [
~
Thomas S.
Moore, Chairman Dr. W. Reed Johnson k
i
)
In the Matter of
)
)
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-275 OL
)
50-323 OL (Diablo. Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,
- )
Units 1.' and 2)
)
)
Messrs. Bruce Norton and Arthur C.
Gehr, Phoenix,'
~
Arizona, and Malcolm H.
Furbush and Philip A.
Crane, Jr., San Francisco, California, for the applicant, Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Messrs'. Herbert H. Brown, Lawrence C. Lanpher and Christopher B.-Hanback, Washington, D.
C., and Byron S.
Georgiou, Sacramento, California, for Governor Edmund Brown, Jr. of the State of California.
Messrs. Harry'M.'Willis and W. Andrew Baldwin, San Francisco, California, for the intervenor, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace.
Messrs. William J.
Olmstead and Charles Barth and Mrs..Lucinda Low Swartz for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff.
DECISION
~
September 9, 1981
'(ALAB-653)
- / Richard S. Salzman was formerly the Chairman of this Appeal Board and participated in evidentiary hearing.
He resigned from the Appeal Panel as of July 19, 1981, and accordingly took no.part in the final consideration and disposition of this matter.
&^.1 'h b ??-
Y i
l
f p*
4
- \\
_2-t We issued today ALAB-653 RESTRICTED.
That decision con-tains our findings of fact and conclusion of law on the con-tested security plan issues in the operating license pro-ceeding for Pacific Gas and' Electric Company's two-unit Diablo Canyon nuclear facility.
Because ALAB-653 RESTRICTED contains numerous details of the facility security plan, it must be treated as protected information and may not be publicly disclosed.
Our nltimate conclusion is not so re-stricted, however, and provides a public record of our action on-the security plan issues.
Based on our review of the entire record on the security plan issues, and subject to the conditions and exceptions noted in ALAB-653 RESTRICTED, we conclude that the applicant's security plan conforms to all applicable provisions of the
]
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's ej security regulationsT-Specifically, the applicant's physical protection system and security organization are adequate to meet the design basis threat of radiological sabotage and provide high assurance that activities involving
_,/
See 10 CFR E573.1, 73.40, 73.55.
m-a
- L.
'4 3..
s :
0-3-
special nuclear material at Diablo Canyon will not be inimical to the common defense and security and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to the public health and safety.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD
>2--
h,
, _ I[$A Barbara A. Tompkins Secretary to the Appeal Board W
e e
e
'l l
e v
y p
+-w---a wy
---g ve-e
,e-rw-v-t e--=
v-
-ry-%-,
, v o m + wo
-,-,--v-
,---7
-, +
,ww-y-=-,----wv.evv v
wr w--
+ --
yr-,-t
. "-
- M%,'o,;
- UNITED STATES
, g7V NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,o g y p.e.,( ;
x; * *,.)j, l g
WASHINGTCN. D. C. 20$55
]
OEC 101981 Joel Reynolds, Esq.
John R. Phillips, Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 10951 West Pico Boulevard Third Floor
~ Los Angeles, California. 90064 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Diablo Canyon Seismic Verification Program The Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) Company has submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission its response to items 2 and 3 in Attachment 1 of the Commission's Order (CL1-80-30) dated November 19, 1981.
I under-stand that PG&E provided copies of this response to -you on December 8, 1981. The Commission's order provides you a period of fifteen days.
from receipt of the response for filing written cor.=ents with the NRC.
I would appreciata an opportunity to discuss your views'en the company's proposed contractors and verification program. Such a meeting with you or your representatives during the comment period would be desirable.
I anticipate Commission consideration of PG&E's response, and written comments,. shortly after the first of the year.
If you should have any questions on this matter piease contact me.
Sincerely, farNA Harold R. Denton, Director Office Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page e
e I, - n rN(3 4 7 7
e
-7p,,
y--,.,.,,,. -.,,
y,
,._m
-..--m____,o
4
. Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush
' Vice President - General Counsel Pacific Gas & Electric Conpany P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 cc:
Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
n J.,
California Pubife Utilities Commission 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 Mr. Frederick Eissler, President Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.
4623 More Mesa Drive Santa Barbara, California 93105 Ms. Elizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Cozadero San Luis Obispo, California 93401
/
Mr. Gordon A.-Silver Ms. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Harry M. Willis, Esq.
Seymour & Willis 601 California Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94108 Mr. Richard Hubbard MHB Technical Associates Suite K 1723 Hamilton Avenue San Jose, California 95125 L
Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor
- San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue P. O. Box 112 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 i
- i o
e e
a e
h 9
Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush cc: Resident Inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory. Commission P. O. Box 369 Avila Beach, California 93424 Ms. Raye Fleming 1920 Mattie Road Shell Beach, California 93440 Joel Reynolds, Esq.
John R. Phillips Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 10951 West Pico Boulevard Third Floor Los Angeles, California 90064 Paul.C. Valentine, Esq.
321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94302 Mr. byron S. Georgiov Legal Affairs Secretary Governor's Office State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.
Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P.C.
1900 M Street, N.W.-
Washington, D.C.
20036 Mr. Dick Blankenburg, Editor & Co-Publisher South County Publishing Company P. O. Box 460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Mr. James 0. Schuyler Vice President - Nuclear Generation Department l-Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 l'
San Francisco, California 94120 Bruce Norton, Esq.
Suite 202 3216 North 3rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85012 e
, - -. - = - -
r
~'
.. ;,. h.,
Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush 3-Mr. W. C. Gangloff l
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
. P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Michael R. Klein, Esq.
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 1666 K Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 David F. Fleischaker, Esq.
Suite 709 1735 Eye Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 O
t[
s I
I l
l l
L v_-,
-. _ _ _ ~..
t D
p/
p3P:u O,
UNITED STATES
.7_
yg n 3 g NUCLE R REGULATORY COMMISSION
'r.g){ pp
'wassiscToN. o. c. 20sss
+*
ikc 1 0 198L The Honorable Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Governor of California Sacramento, California 95814
Dear Governor Brown:
Subj ect:
Diablo Canyon Seismic Verification Program
_ As I have discussed with Herb Brown and Byron Georg' iou, the Pacific Gas & Electric (PGsE) Company has submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Conrnission its response to items 2 and 3 in Attachment 1 of the Commission's Order (CLI-80-30) dated November 10, loBl.
I under-stand that PGCE provided copies of this, response to your office on December 8, 1981. The Commission's order.provides you a period of fi f teen days - f rom receipt of the response for filing written comments with the NRC.
I wo"uld appreciate an opportunity to discuss your views on th~e company's proposed contractors and verification program.
Such a meeting,with you or your representatives during the comment period would be desirable.
I anticipate Commission consideration of PGLE's response, and written com:nents, shortly af ter the first of the year.
If you should have any questions on this matter please contact me.
Sincerely, Abk Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatior p
QLv 1[L 7 3
r 7
OIABLO CANYON Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush Vice President - General Counsel Pacific Gas & Electric Canpany P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 cc:
Philip A. Crane, Jr., ~Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California ' 94120 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
~
California Public Utilities Commission 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102' Mr. Frederick Eissler, President.
Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.
4623 More Mesa Drive Santa Barbara, California 93105 Ms. Elizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Cozadero San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Mr. Gordon A. Silver Ms. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Harry M. Willis, Esq.
Seymour & Willis 601 California Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94108 Mr. Richard Hubbard MHB Technical Associates Suite K 1723 Hamilton Avenue San Jose, California 95125 Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue P. O. Box 112 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 g.
^
Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush -
cc: Resident Inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 369 Avila Beach, California 93424 Hs. Raye Fleming 1920 Mattie Road Shell Beach, California 93440 Joel Reynolds, Esq.
John R. Phillips, Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 10951 kest Pico Boulevard Third Floor Los Angeles, California 90064 Paul C. Valentine, Esq.
321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94302 Mr. byron S. Georgiov Legal Affairs Secretary Governor's Office State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.
~
Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P.C~
1900 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 hr. Dick Blankenburg, Editor & Co-Publisher South County Publishing Company P. O. Box 460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Mr. James 0. Schuyler Vice President - Nuclear Generation Department Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 Bruce Norton, Esq.
Suite 202 3216 North 3rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85012
l Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush
- Mr. W. C. Gangloff Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Michael R. Klein, Esq.
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 1666 K Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 David F. Fleischaker, Esq.
Suite 709 1735 Eye Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 e
7 MI O
O i
a l
r l
/
I r
t_D
o UNITED STATES
,, 7
/
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,, f 7]' g nesson v O,
1450 MARIA LANE. SUITE 260
,o#
~~
WALNUT CAEEK. CAUPORMA 94596 m
s.
5 Docket.Nos. 50 275 50-323 DEC 3 01981 i.
o ". '
3 a
f'.j.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 e
_l San Francisco, California 94106 j
Attention:
Mr. Philip A. Crane, Jr.
Assistant General Counsel I
l Gentlemen:
With respect to the NRC's continuing investigation of the Dr. R. L. Cloud matter:
i 1.
Please direct Dr. Cloud to provide under oath or affirmation the following information, directly to this office, with a copy to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company:
a.
A compilation of all written and known oral comments related to the four draft reports from R. L. Cloud Associates that were submitted to PG&E on October 21, October "26, November 6, and November 12, 1981.
b.
For each comment, identify the draft report, the page number, the section number and whether the comment was made by a PG&E employee or an employee of Dr. Cloud.
If the comment was made by an employee of Dr. Cloud, identify the employee by name.
For purpos.es of these responses, please identify the draft dated October 21, 1981 as draf t 1, the draft dated October 26, 1981 as draft 2, the draft dated November 6,1981 as draft 3, and the draft dated November 12, 1981 as draf t 4.
c.
For each comment, indicate whether or not the comment resulted in a revision of the material being commented on.
d.
For each comment for which a change was made, provide an explanation as to why the change was made, For each comment that resulted in a change, identify the log or e.
other document which substantiates the explanation.
Dr. Cloud should be instructed that neither Dr. Cloud nor any of his employees should discuss any of the responses or any draf ts thereof with PG&E employees, or seek any other information from PG&E employees in preparing the above in forma tion.
e a
sr g
~ ~,, w y
,n
Pacific Gas and Electric Company '
b d'! NUl 2.
Please provide under oath or affirmation the following information to this office:
Identify all persons (PG&E, Westinghouse, etc., with specific names) a.
who were provided copies of the four draft reports from R. L. Cloud Associates, and identify the draf t number of each such document.
For purposes of these responses, please identify the draft dated October 21, 1981 as draft 1, the draft dated October 26, 1981 as draf t 2, the draft dated November 6,1981 as draft 3, and the draf t dated November 12,1981 as draf t 4..,
b.
Identify all persons and parties, other than employees of Dr. Cloud who made either~ oral or written comments on such documents, and list each comment, the commentor, the draf t number, the pa'ge number, and the section of each document.
Identify which of these connents were forwarded to Dr. Cloud.
c.
- d. ' For each comment transmitted to Dr. Cloud, identify how and through whan (Mr. Rocca or otherwise) the comment was submitted to Dr. Cloud.
The responses to these requests should be submitted by January 15, 1981.
If you or Dr. Cloud have any questions concerning this request, please contact my office directly.
Please be advised that the information requested above is in addition to that requested of you in my letter to PG&E dated December 23, 1981.
f & 4 l---
R. H. Engelken Regional Administrator cc:
G. A. Maneatis e
g.7 m,,nn,g,,,,,
j ) /.";.. -.g wAswmann.o.p rosas -
a.:
w....as-j Docket Nos.: 50-275 MAY 181982 and 50-323 2
i
,g
, APPLICANT: Pacific Gas & Electric Company j
]
j FACILITY:
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 & 2 i
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- APRIL 30,1982 DISCUSSION OF ROLE OF BECHTEL i
POWER CORPORATION IN COMPLETION OF THE DIABLO CANYON PRGJECT,
's
{
UNITS 1 & 2
_o I
Background & Introduction
)
1 On March 22,1982 ~ Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) announced that the Bechtel Power Corporation an Francisco (Bechtel) will participate in the
~ '
j ccrapletion of the PG&E Diablo Cagon Project, Unit 1 and 2 (Enclosure 1).
I On April 22, 1982 PG&E announced the organization for the Diablo Canyon 2roject (Enclosure 2). PG&E requested a meeting with NRR management to q
explain the Diablo Canyon organization and address NRR questions on the subject.
2 A meeting was held in Bethesda,. Maryland on April 30, 1982 to discuss with
~
}
representatives of PG&E and Bechtel the role the latter has assumed in the completion of the Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 Project. Enclosure 3 is the
- [
PG&E agenda for the meeting and Enclosure 4 depicts the Diablo Canyon Project i
}
Organization. Enclosure 5 is a list of attendees.
1 Discussion Mrs George Maneatis, PG&E Senior Vice President for Facilities Development, states that PG&E has engaged Bechtel for the completion of the Diablo Canyon Project 1
with management personnel responsible for the overall direction and with profes-a j
sional staff to supplement the PG&E organization. The resulting Diablo Canyon Project Organization (Enclosure 4) is a single, totally integrated organization of Bechtel and PJ.&E personnel. Maneatis stated that other engineering orge,nizati.
4 had been considered. Bechtel was selected on the bases of availability, manageme and technical. support capability, and geographical location, among other factors.
j Maneatis stated that Bechtel has perfomed engineering functions for PG&E on othes projects in the past but is not retained by PG&E on a continuous basis.
Mr. Howard Friend of Bechtel is the Project Completion Manager and will report directly to Maneatis. Friend stated that the objective of the organization is to fulfill all requirements for reinstating the low power license of Unit 1 and for meeting full power licence requirements for both units..To this end a-team of senior PG&E and Bechtel managers has been fomed. They are dedicated
/
2 f
'1
(
ym i
t
{'
9 SMM 4
c -- ;.+
i 3,
full-time to the Diablo Canyon Project. Friend, previously the Bec
~
for the transition activities on the South Texas Project, explaine
!j for the design the case of that project Bechtel assumed the responsiblity sibility for while in the case of Diablo Cartyon Bechtel assumes the responBech v
i 2; however, Bechtel is not expected to participate in constructio
{
concluding the project.
with the possible exception of some management overview.
i The Diablo Canyon Project The following infomation was provided by Friend.
b t 120 Organization will employ fulltime approxtrately 200 professionals 4
l f t and location at the Bechtel offices in San Francisco to ach from PGaE gnd 80 from Bechtel.
l Administratively the PG&E system will be us project envircrrnent.
docurrentation and control.The program has the full cemitment of the Bec and vice versa.
Power Division.
The design verification program for Unit 1 is part of the entire proj d the At this time Bechtel believes that no additional wort is required beyo dicate scope of the verification program unless the results far from plan and schedule for the design effort. This has been missing so othe rwise.
the PG&E activities.
j ct and Mr. John Hoch from PG&E is the Project Manager for' the Diablo C (see Enclosure 3). Hoch member of the Management Team and will report to Friend j t and for inter-will be responsible for the day to day operations of the pro ecS To achieve Separate pes have been assigned to Units 1 and 2.
action with the NRC.
d Cost better scheduling of the entire project a separate Project Schedulin report to Hoch.
Engin,eering function has been established.
d to expedite to avoiq delays due to materials and equipment ava'ilability an license requirements.
the review of modifications in accordance with operating f
advisory Mr. R. Ash. ley from Bechtel will provide licensing guidance and pe Through Ashley the function that is not limited to NRC licensing activities.
i g and entire Bechtel licensing system will be made available (e.g., gather n f Ccemission distribution of appropriate infomation, NUREG activit activities).on the Diablo Canyon project that had been identified. '
in the technical Mr. R. Anderson from Bechtel will provide function Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP).
Chief Engineers are not members frm Bechtel and PG&E to resolve rajor issues.of the Diabl i
taff
'are available for consultation and assistance.
r i
k I
4 p.
em 4
4--
,m 3-
)
lity assurance (QA) j Mr. C. Dick will provide functional support to the qua At the present the project is conducted in accord j
activities of the project.
ance with the existing PG&E corporate QA program.."BQ Topical Report-j d to be issued in Junc j
based on the NRC approved Bechtel topical report It will be submitted to PGAE for approval and is expecte to issue stop work i
1982. PG8E has the overall QA responsibility and author ty ity. This QA~ program will apply only to the Diablo C 1
3.
i tion that tivities to a close i.e., it doesThe progr orders.
will bring the design and construction ac I
Dick stated that Bechtel not apply to the operation of the. facility.
1 d others.
i finds it acceptable although to the activities of the IDVP by Teledyne an has reviewed the current PGAE QA program and He also stated that the i
it is not oriented toward a project such as this. ies that had been reporte ii current program does not suffer from the def c enc At the close of the meeting Mr. Denton provided Mr.
No statements for comments.
of the Governor of California, the opportunity were made.
I 7
w i
Hans Schierling, Project Manager Verification Program Design Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encloustes:
See next pdge 1
i I
w G
e l
l 4
i l
. =
- - - 7 ~ ' ~ " ~?" '
i.;
l 1
4 s
r,,.
- f. Control..(50-27!V323) -
.t
.l,-
7
- .* es '
i-
.f 9
- ino/SBuckley
-PM 1
..e, OELD 3
. f,d.inistrator, Region V if cipants:
H. Denton R. Vollmer l
E. Jordan R. Tedesco J. Knight 1
- _. +
F. Miraglia a
T. Bishop i
L. Chandler B. ' Buckley
~
- (-
H. Schierling
f. $'.M.-*
K. Herring-
'^
s.
J. Fair
"?l c ' ' b i
.y...+4.
i s....
1...
. q..... y.._.
l l.
o l.
i 1
'.....:. 4 g c,..:r,.,.ne r
y s-tice List n
c i
0.
a a
.t f
i
- ~ ~...
=.: -- - ~. - - :
.. c r.
9
y; -
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ -
,j Mr.- Malcolm H. Furbush Yice President - General ' Counsel
~
P,acif.ic Gas & Electric Conpany P.O. Box 7442
'q San Francisco, California 94120 9
I*
cc: Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
-l P.O. Box 7442 l*
San Francisco, California 94120 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
California Public Lailities Coe. mission 350 le A11ister Street San Francisco', California 94102
-t Mr. Frederick Eissier, President Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.
4523 More Mesa Drive Santa Sarbara, California. 93105 Ms. Elizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Ce za dero San Luis Obispo, California 93401
' I4r. Gordon A. Silver Ms. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Harry M. Willis, Esq.
Seymour & Willis 601 California Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94108 Mr. Richard Hubbard hHs Technical Associates i
Suite K l
1723 Hamilton Avenue
}
San Jose, California 95125
.i
.j Mr. John "arrty-Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune
{
1321 Johnson Avenue P. O. Box 112 3-1 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 i
2 s
1i
'{.
1 i
tI
=
1
-.~.--....--3
. ~..
'Mr. Malcoln H. Furbush *
'L".
cc: Resident Inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS c/o U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Cor. mission P. O. Box 369
. 93424 o
Avila Beach, California Hs. Raye Fieming 1920 t'.atti e Roac c
Shell Beach, California 93440 Joel i.eynolds. Esq.
John R. Phillips, Esq.
Center for Law in the Public Interest 10951 West Pico Soulevara Thiro Floor Los Angeles, California 900b4 Paul C. Valentine, Esq. -
321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94302 Mr. byron 5. Georgiov Legal Affairs Secretary Governor's Office State Capitol Sacramento, *Cali fornia 95814 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.
Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P.C.
1900 h Street, N.W.
- ashington, D.C.
20036 Mr. Qick Blankenburg, Editor & Co-Publisher South County Publi shing Cor.rpany P. O. Box 460 Arroyo Grance, Cali fornia 9342U Mr. James 0. Schuyler Vice President - Nuclear Generation Department Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. box 7442 San Francisco, Californie 94120 i
brute !:orton, Esq.
Suite 204 3216 reorth 3rc Street i
Phoenix, Arizona 85012 E
e i
t
.i e
?...
....=...-..-- -
=._..., c.. ~w 4
j :
',, Mr. Malcola H. Furbush
-3.
Mr. W. C. Gangloff Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 David F. Fleischaker, Esq.
- s. -
i P. O. Box 1178-Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101 Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.
Snell.a Wilmer.
3100 Yalley Center
.cc.T.
1-Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. Owen H. Davis, Director Federal Agency Relations i
Pacific Gas and Electric Company i
1050 17th Street',' N.W~
9 Suite 1180 d
Washington, D.c.
20036 4
,e s e
- e
?
5 G
Y e
6 p
~
i "Ne- - -
.. m s.w,.
,v%,=,
ai,g,,
, -c e
n.rwo.n.sv tc c.m. 22 3 p.m. Werkdays).
781-4211 (After 3 p.m Werkends and Holiday i
FC2. DoiZDI. ATE RILIASE 1
i M. arch 22, 1982 ICETIL VILL MANACE DIA3Lo C M ON P RO.TECT Pacific Cas and Electric Co=pany announced today that it has hired achtel power Corporation to act as project manager for the co=pletion and I
i, licensing of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.
PCLE's chair =.an of the board, Frederick t2, Mielke,
.Jr., said that i
nachtel vill have the responsibility for the renaining work necessary to:
- Restore the company _'s
-.=,a-nded low rm er license,for Unit 1;
.n
- Secure a full power license for tuu (
nt; e,
m o
-l::
I
- Co=plete cons tiuction of Unit 2; and
- Provide start up engineeri g and construction support needed to
,~j 7:
' bring both units into commercial operation.
In announcing the selection of Bechtel Power Corporation as project
=.ana g e r,
Mielke-noted that "Bechtel h*as wcrridvide* expedience in the
~
engineering'apd construction of nuclear power *pla'nts and under its supe rvision than half of the nuclear plant udits in t5si's country have.been broug e on
= ore i
line."
The 'Bechtel group vill aug=ent PC&E's engineering forces and supervisory staff, Mielke said, "so that we can co=plete the work at Diable Canyon within a reasonable tina consistent with the highest standards of
' safety, quality and reliability."
Eachtel Power Corporation President Harry O. Re'insch ecmented that Lechtel vas " pleased to have been asked to participate in the rensining work i:
==cessary to bring Diablo Canyon into operation."
He added:
o
- more -
r-,--.,,,,,-
,_.---,.,.y,..e
- ocatoi rovar 'Co porc:Lon'D oxtensivo oxP2r1GncO in tha
~~~
~
-t;. ' nusloer.indus try, I
.t=
confident that tho combi'oad resourcas of 3achte I
Ma$ v11'1 result in a project cow le: ion of the highes: quality in an i
officiant a=d tia 17 m ass r,
- PO4I'* announca=nst cz=4 on the heels of a decisies by the staff of 2e :velaar Engulatory Cc ission to approve the *el2a a Corpora:x.o= to c==due th e design verifie=ti32 P70Er m for the povar plang, Mialke said 'he was. pleased with the decision 'hicausa "the r ev e rs.,:.. cation progr": n0W Can so forward with a minimus of delay."
"* are going to have a Pl'n*- th8-v2Il operate v.. th m axi.=u.n j
i
- efety. he said.
nI want our ccepa=y to be in a posi: LOC ' ' -
- C M 11sb pro =pely j
vhstaver nest s to ha d
dona se Diablo Ca= yon
- Ig 4*
sCf this purpose I have
~
on:; aged :he 3achtel Power Co-poratie as
~
projae: m g er j
Mielka added
~5x*-
he shares cus to=:ers ' ceniers about the burden I'
t}. is' winter's high utility bills.
"Getting the blablo Ca=yos pever pia,.
safely and successfu11 7 on line vill do more than-a:7 single thing the' ee=p,=7 can de to help m:abill:e electric bills * -La t i *
'4j n
ou d*P*ndence on c=stly.eil and natural gas, and provida our eu t'e-hrs with.'
s'fe, reliable alee: Le s
a
- o 0:erry supply for the years to ecce," he said.
2 i
+++
N
\\
g l
2 t
j e
Y 4
h l
1 1
4
'.s
't 3
1 I
1
_i 3
i p...--ven-.....-......-.....
~~
s.. '. ' s -
~
~
^
'w
. ll ' *
,jansg
~
l'*
/g.
~
~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 0,
a
/
OCT 6 1982 Dr. William E. Cooper IDVP Project Manager Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02254
Dear Dr. Cooper:
On September 10, 1982 R. F. Reedy Inc., the IDVP organizaticr cerforming the QA audits within the program, conducted an exit meeting on'Pnase II QA audits with representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).
Mr. T. W. Bishop, a member of the NRC Region V staff, attended the meeting and prepared a summary of the meeting including related comments (memo-randum from R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator, to H. R. Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 15,1982).
Although the NRC has not approved yet the Phase II plan for the IDVP, we believe that the Region V comments on Phase II activities already in progress,.such as the QA audits, are appropriate.
We therefore are providing you with the above mentioned memorandum for your consideration.
We request that you consider the co.mments in your evaluation of the Reedy findings, particularly with respect to _the limited scope of the audit as compared to the scope as specified in the NRR letter of November 19, 1981.
It is our understanding that the Reedy report (s) on the QA ~ audits will not be issued until mid-October. We request that you provide a status of the QA audits in your next semi-monthly report.
incerely,(e l M. b L(
Darrel G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
R. F. Reedy, Inc.
236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 G. A. Maneatis Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120
, s, e d I A fr 9 TP-
,p; 9
7O 10 e
,s Distribution:
Document Control (50-323/275)
NRC PDR L PDR NSIC PRC System LB#3 File ACRS (16)
HDenton/ECase DEisenhut/RPurple TNovak JKerrigan Dr. William E. Cooper e
IDVP Project Manager LChandler Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue EJordan, I&E JTaylor, I&E Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 TBishop WHaass
Dear Dr. Cooper:
Region V On September 10., 1982 R. F. Reedy Inc., the IDVP organization performing the QA audits within the program, conducted an exit meeting on Phase II QA audits with representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).
Mr. T. W. Bishop, a member of the NRC Region V staff, attended the meeting and prepared a sumary of the meeting including related coments (memo-randum from R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator, to H. R. Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 15,1932).
Although the NRC has not approved yet the Phase II plan for the IDVP, we believe that the Region V' comments on Phase II activities already in progress, such as the QA audits, are appropriate.
We therefore are providing you with the above mentioned memorandum for your consideration.
We request that you consider the comments in your evaluation of the Reedy findings, particularly with respect to the limited scope of the audit as compared to.the scope as specified in the NRR letter of November 19, 1981.
It is our understanding that the Reedy report (s) on the QA audits will not be issued until mid-October. We request that you. provide a
- tatus of the QA audits in your next semi-monthly report.
Sincerely, utginal signea by
-r Usenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
R. F. Reedy, Inc.
236 H. Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 G. A. Maneatis Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120
- See previous page for concurrence / initials DL,:.(B#,3.,,,,3,', l DL,:.(B,9,,,,,,, DL : AD: L DL:D NRR:DIR m.c o i
a,*
- TNovak
- DD $e hhut HDent
-e.,.. HS..c hi.e r.l.d..n.)h.J Ke.r r.i..g a n
.i.
.. /.. '.../82 one > 9/.22/.8a.n..q.L.. !9/.23/.82
./.28/82 l9 9
.i./29/82 10 ro u m oo.n emeu c:4 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY v::.,.:.,. i _.u.
_.= 'T j
/
Distribution:
Document Control (50-3 3/275)
- LB#3 File ACRS (16)
Dr. William E. Cooper HDenton/Epdse TBishop IDVP Project Manager DEisenhtst'/RPurple WHaass Teledyne Engineering Services TNova Region V $
130 Second Avenue JKer gan Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 HS erling JLee
Dear Dr. Cooper:
% Chandler
/I&E On September 10, 1982 R. F. Reedy Inc., the Ig/P organization performing the QA audits within the program, conducted an it meeting on Phase II QA audits with representatives of Pacific Gas and E ctric Company (PG&El.
Mr. T. W.
Bishop, a member of the NRC Region V st f, attended the meeting and prepared a sur:raary of the meeting including rel sed comments (memorandum from R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrat
, to H. R. Denton, Director,' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated S ptember 15,1982).
Although the NRC has not approve yet the Phase II plan for the IDVP, we believe that our comments on P se II activities already in progress, such as the QA audits, are appropr' ate. We therefore are providing you with the above mentioned memorandum r your infomation.
We request that you consider the comments with respect o the requirements as set forth in our letter of November 19, 1981 to PG& which is the basis for Phase II of the IDVP.
It is our understanding t t the Reedy report (s) on the QA audits will not be issued until mid-Octo er. We request that you provide a status of the QA audits in your next emi-monthly report.
Sincerely,
-teimi sitmed W 3
1,,.-y -
D'arrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing cc:
R. F. Aeedy, Inc.
236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Lo Gatos, California 95030
/'.A.Maneatis
. F. Fray Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 t
O l
.'). ' DL: LB#3 DL: AD:t /
DL:D l
.D L..:.L..B.#. 3 I
I lNRR:DIR omer6 l
m,..dschieclingl3xerg,an.
j a, Den,to,n
,{,,,,,
inoyau De,.. y.
ou,3..v..i..k....g2,,,9[,,',}, / 82,,,,. 9,/,,,,f,,/,82,,,,, 9,/c%.
),,,/,82 9/
/8 O FFICI A L R ECTO R D CO PY m..
(7*'
i
..v-y
...u, e
Date
- F,_.
.'J
- t RO.UTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP -
e ;.,. -
70t (Name, oSice symbol toom number, -
Initiets Date
.<....,, bunding, Agency / Poet)
,a?;'.
~,:
.:pe n n.m m
f.y,' c.) ( '~.' j './ [, ~ [ *' /
' ki:;
-k' & $LLL t $(AL.7 -.
~
'%e j.-
g._f,y l-
- p;-.,-;
. _ - [. r;
~
- g;7;
+ *
~
. g ', _ y M. ~
1
,. '~% H.
'1 :x x
~
.g.
Action File Note and Return
~~" ' Approval For Clearancs Per Conversation As Requested For Correction Prepare Reply l
Circulate For Your Information See Me Comment investigste Signature Coordination Justify
' ~, MM.~. '.
+,
O
.. ~
3.. :.y.;.g.,.;
,,.. 1-
.l
.: a,, +
+
~
(QbQ{
- f.'
i.'._' '<.,
,,s
^
s
. a 3
' 4 l
(
q U
s lo r -
~
y
^
g p t a t-r d o " 3
.v
_/
a o
DO NOT use this' form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, clearances and similar actions FROM:(Name, org symtof, Agency / Post)
Room No.-Bldg.
Phone No.
5041-102 OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
E2*in.**8 6.I.G.sA f
co
< y..- e -
~-. g.,.. j. -,_,
l
'.,l..,,;;,
. - * ~ -
- n..
., ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP
' % [yn. office symbol, room number eme y_w. m
(/l"
'"m" o~-
3, y-p 3.-
3,.
- y.. - V.(
_g E_.
~
,.: ___ hdA '
' File
[.
Ap p.L i
Note and Retum For Clearance 1 As Requested Per Conversation
]
For Correction
__!Circulate -
Prepare Reply
, __ Mment For Your Information See Me
} Coordination investigate Signature
, Justify RDAARKS - -
=
b
.y
'r.
p.q w
.q
- g.
c..
dR, C,s.CLL' dLe Qk
,'1g l.
)c.b'CsM.
~/
1 JN$
(of(
Ofi M-k ck DO N0'T use this' form as a RECOMO 'o'f approvels, conc clearances, and similar actions x
sposals*
FROM: (Name, org. mbol, Agency / Post)
' Room No.-Bldg.
}$/ l Phone No.
5043-102 OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
W'?"***.*X C.%..._..
rn
- .g" p.
.+
?
Date
. ROUTING AND -TRANEMITTAL SUP 9/22/82-
.c. :a, m.
- .TO
- -(Name, oNice symbol, room number,.
Initials
- Date.
- . G.-
.. ; bu.ilding, Agency / Post) y
- g *
.u...,e....
P 9h.,?.?L -Hi':SCHIERLING
-~
- w.
.u,
~
c-;
..a*
- '2 5 N - "..'....
.T... r
~ [ k m ;(_'
?.Q ~ 2;
=.* i "
Q
- * '&.';.:. ; &J.i KERRIGANe ' Cr.'
e.
}r.V ~
.j 4 *1 *) _'.:f ?l,[] ',
- M: a g. [
f,.
- 9.-.._.
, 4T.1' " * ' ^ "a s., ' " 7 ' ' ~
7 es.
.g
-.<e
' 7 '.:.:h
.-?..
ll\\ D.
MG 4. O. ' GMu i.qr u
- g.
a*
~.+ gk +::. 7:;
~.
~
- 6.b. s.1 Hi 0ENTON'
.e, -
- Action :- :-4 File' '
- Note and Retum -
..~
..I5}
Approval d 7. -
For Clearance' Per Conversation w -
@..> a.
As Requested For Correction Prepare Reply
,i'r Circulate.C For Your information -
See Me-
-4 Comment Investigate
- Signature
'.j Coordination Justify REMARKS...
,,/
.......: F '.:., - -....
.4
.%,..q..T. h, Pf.. HENDERSONf,.dfspatch.1
~'
'W
...f,.r. y.6. c:... ~ ~..~ ~T -<.. ~
.4
.a.-
.s-
.i'M b' k bhb.
k b
I
[
SN#E s
- .%b;JL f.Eco'OhR2ETTES.'R5:s; QA. AUDIh. FOR. D i.R.a K+. :..f;.t.,:'.- (A W ?.,:+. ;f, e " d.. + ' J. ;.- =. : -
- v:
-.... %.;'q-<:D- :.. :-: ? '-,.'=.;Dg,
,,w@--; n
.; p,
n.
,,..~ ~g. :W:n ;N~ wn-7...-
y y
.?
4 v.
..m e.: ~ ; t ~ -
=.
3.:'.,. :, /; ' -(,:f.7):; ', ~..
^.
_, f.r.,_
3 e-v
,'.T.' '; y '., 3- + h *..,
^~./.Y.
v*
.c
- y.,-
K ',
. y:,.
=
e..
.2, s
Q AA G.
. v DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrerces, disoosals.
- ~ -
clearances, and similar actions FROM: (Name, org; syrnbol, Agency / Post)
Room No.-Bldg.
Phone No.
504-102, OPTIONAL FORM 41 -(Rev. 7-76) '
s Presenbod by GSA FPMR (41 CTR) 101-11.2o6 e GPO 1981 o. >1-129 (103)
~
8 a
- pa n au o
UNITED STATES
^,,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
{,!.
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
( s.s /
Dr. William E. Cooper IDVP Project Manager Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02254
Dear Dr. Cooper:
On September 10, 1982 R. F. Reedy Inc., the IDVP organization performing the QA audits within the program, conducted an exit meeting on Phase II QA audits with representatives of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Mr. T. W.
Bishop, a member of the NRC Region V staff, attended the meeting and prepared a summary of the meeting including related comments (memorandum from R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator, to H. R. Denton, Director, Office of 1
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated September 15,1982).
Although the NRC has not approved yet the Phase II plan for the IDVP, we believe that our comments on Phase II activities already in progress, such as the QA audits, are appropriate. We therefore are providing you with the above mentioned memorandum for your information. Wa *^q"ae+
+h'+ r^_ ::::' der the ::._...
o. J.. mo gum, ;; th: - q"#-^-^-+-
ear fneth in our letter of
=e
_ 'L. m...se, -^
'0*1
+n PG&E which f e tha basis fnr Phaea 77 0 th: ! ?Y,",
It is our. understanding that the Reedy report (s) on the QA audits will not be issued until mid-October. We request that you provide a status of the QA audits in your next semi-monthly report.
Sincerely, s
t-1 Darrel
. Eisen ut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
R. F. Reedy, Inc.
236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 G. A. Maneatis R. F. Fray Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120
' ~
TOWARD OTILITY EATE NORMALIZATION 693 Mission Street 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 543-1576 Sylvia M.Siegel run. o -
October 25a 1982
~
Harold Denton Staff Director Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wa shin g ton,
D.C.
20202
Dear Mr. Denton:
Th e " San Fran ci s co Chroni cl e " reported on the Diablo Canyon i n ves ti ga ti on and modifica tion program by PGGE.
I am particularily interested in the second las t para-graph of the attached news clip that the investiga tion "goes *far beyond'" steps ordered by the commission when
.k'4 suspended Diablo's license.
Could you kindly elaborate on that comment.
Preferab.1g, pro vi de us wi th a document comparing your order with the work currently being _ performed by PGGE and i ts agen ts to correct pr e vi o usl y disclosed problems.
Have any cost figures been in troduced in to your record?
Can you a d vi se whether or no t there are duplicate tran-scripts of NRC hearings at your regional o!! ice in Walnut Creek?
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Yours very truly, bem daga pDi Sy vi a M.
Siegel Exe cu ti ve Director SMStair Attachment CE i ! OE4ML m,. n., e ADOCK'053 dEf5 W /04 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Frances Sha.skan. r.r.e,........d Edmondson,c.o r...w,< caw. Clarence Heller, Richard Liebes.We t-c.~
t...
Hon. Jonn E. Moss; Helen Nelson, coa -c rce.m..Is. 6,#. A Mark Northeross; Mary Solow, c-ic race s c e. Peter Stern,s -en Amy Weitz, L. F.cc e c-.,
Aum Nat Yanish, c.um t,o.a. c u os %,
TURN is a non. profit, tax exempt consumer organization: contributions are tax deductible.
~
t p.u. m, n
a n.
1 Diablo A-Plant
- [Qgfg$$
Denton said 445 modificatiorE have been made since the plant's y(@ Qff@d problems were discovered by N G the. E in@d pipe supports. 43 concerned electrical suppern and 03 were made to the By John fogarty tutiding housing the reactor.
Chronicle tr hington Burra:s as lie said an additional:00 errors related to seismic safety and 30 Washington
-'l related to non seismic safety condi-
..Pacifle Gas and Electr!E tions have been discovered through Co.'s Diablo Canyon nuclear,
last month. Denton said 14 of the poiver plant could be ready to" seismic safety errors and 12 affect-load fuel and hcgin testing, init nonscismic safety will require next spring and begin fulg.
cither design or construction mods-power ot;cration by the end of fic:tions.
summer -if "no new surpris:"
es" are found at the trou!> led' lie said the investigation nr.d plant, the Nuclear Regulatory.
modification pre; ram. w!g:h is Commission was told yester.
N'I"4 C0"d".Cd DE POO8**Ih' techtel Corp and Tcledyne Engi-day
- neering Services, was "unprecc-Commission Staff Director Htr..
der.ted in the history of nuclear old Denton told the five. member lower" end socs "far beyond' steps crdered by the commision when it pcnol at a technic:1 bricting thr.t an suspendtd Diablo's license.
" unprecedented" investigation ofi the pir.nt has not revealed any ma.
.jor safety problems and that while' lie said PG&E belicies it will many modifications" have been finhh its investication of the plat.t made.
by December 15 and that a final minor,,they have generally been report on the condition of the $14 billion plant will be ready for cotu.
The commission late last year goi$
that rIa.
bE granted and then suspended a 11-vu cense allowing fuel loading and fin! hed tbuut.tlarch I.
low power testing at the plant near.
San Luis Obispo after discovery of design flaws that would affect the or,---
facility's ability to withstand a sub-stantial earthquake.
.n a.
os 4.
t
.4 l.,
A
.. a l =,.......
10/25/82 l11/4/82 NRR-82-435 i
Syl.'ia M. Siegel d
r.
y4 On,O CC; OTM.R, l'
H. Denton G--;
J.
I O
O 1,
" = " *
","11/24/82
=c actio====av O
===' ear O
e_. 3....,
,on....c.
,,6. com
..a,,o.,
.l
- 1..c.,,r,
. ~ o,_,,,,,
..... ro an a c.iv.o.,
av.
requests elaboration on enclosed Eisenhut 11/4 cc-case newspaper article re modification &
Dent inyestigationJrogram at facility gfggg g/f
.sr.w,. e = v'"'
.//
2.
Hanauer h/4Kyr'v'
// 5 1
Mattenn
'# C*
4.
Vollmer I
8; _
Thnmnenn 6.
Chec'k 7
R_ n.,u, An w.
+
ai 7".'.
e.
.._ _...._-m.,,..,,
Day.., e..v 0 * * ?.?.. 7 n.s, 0.*..*..,,.*.:.s
.e.
a u a muc.aan a.cv.atoav cowuissio,
ec'av d a..s.
MAIL CONTROL FORM 4
REGULATURY INFORMATION DISTRIuUTION SYSTEP (FIDS)
ACCESS!trN tJ o R: 521102016o DUC.DATE: 82/10/25 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET
- F8CIL:50-2/5 Diaolo' Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Facific Ga -05000?75 50-323 Diaolo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Pacific Ga 05000323 AUTH.fiAME AUTh0R AFFILIATION SIEGEL,S.F.
Affiliation Unknown RECIP.NAPL RECIPILN1 AFFILIATION DENTON,H.
NRC - No Octaileo Affiliation Given
SUBJECT:
Recuests elaboration on e,n c l newspaper article re mod R-investigation program at facility, s
DISTRIbulION CODE: Xh01S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: __.,
TITLE: Exec. Corresponcence lho Specific Dkt. Trans, to Denton/ Case)
NOTES:J Hanchett icy POR Occurents.
05000215 J Hanchett ley PUR Occuments.
05000323 HECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE /NAFL LTlR ENCL ID CODE /NAFE LTTd ENCL a.
IhTERhAL:#.f.R ri / P P A S4 1
1 recTES:
1 1
e.
\\
g/
t 1
.m 1
i 9 j
/M
/ ',
.J s
/
,N k
C }N v. [;.O 4
m
.L 96
-h
- 9_.
- .i.,,
e y*,
.i 4 2g.
~.
,..e:*
.e w.*,..
A y,.
e r.
.a T~
-.A
.g s.
.,.. *..e
-4
...., g ; s.. t. a.
- ... g.
n c.:a;.; r....j.
s
.z.. c u..~......
t = e....
. - c. >., s 'S.
e * :.=
1 r. s. e 9 y,
- e.. -
.- ~ i
.n.
e
...s r r........,.i. - e..y.. O T -
~ S"o #. ": h.~. ~ D
'.I'^***-
. w
. *...:, n r, s t.
,i i.*,.., y e, *: -
- ,n.
=,..... >
- 7.., s
..e e.
s
' t.:. J
.v.1 e. s... n.a.s.
i s s.V. L.ne, T:
a....
.e. n....
9..-,
.sie.wi..ja
- ,. m. s-
- p.. m.
- e.,.
r.
u
.a i. -
~
' ear "s.
Sit,el:
'Camb:r
.e....
...... 4.e s....
.e e........
- e, :..-,..~.. a..e. i...,.
....sn
..g w.
- z..
- :.. x.
- r.,.
.,s. q. c..e.
..:.. u...
n...-.. 7.,.,.
- r. *. *., r *
- s '.. P. *. ;*. # e '.#...'.
E
'8.*.,,. *"4.- ~ '
t;.*..=. I.'*. ' '.... - "6-.
V C..**. *.. *.~.$ . '. i '.* *. -
n t,
T. 4 :'
.f
.s'-
. +
- G ;.
C..i r.
- i..., -.
a..
6.
- s
.. 6.. -
4
.5
..... a.e
.. a,.
.. i..
.t r. ra...
.. e. o... :. s
.q
....; a
& p. i./....
.. a.
..,. e r.,.0.3......,. er, s.,;;.
e..r..
.e
._r.,..
.r..
.=..
.e E... ;.... r
. iDTCTD....
4.
i.. a.. :....
... 4 4...
.; g g j,.h.,.,
.. t. $ 1..,t 4 ;.
=
. 7 0..,
- c. nwe &
C.,.,
- e, 4..
2.
- t...j e. e. d. e..)
.a s.*6.j r., c v, 6.. '..= r 9.0. w.. s'2 a t whi c'.. '."... r,e r. w.=.$
d*. s C.".e s a. 4 e
"'e.
O t f f. C r **. s e.'w j y n.
s. ^s i n.,
85 d j S e.US S EC' j a..
Ta.a.l. Cc. eJra. 7 as. e. r. r. v.
- p. r. a. a. r.m -
v. <,. :
4.c
., s.
.s ucn e......a. -our a. stenra,.
.s..
.sriCnion effort Currat.ly in progre$s goes be. cort :Fe Co rie:i:r
. all
..; r
.ncius.: :. r; view ano, rear.3 syr :
er
.....s crogrs,e., r........'.
.c.
ir m.J4t1,.,l D.C...
. e.
4 4
.aie. 6
.i 5...
,a.
di s,.,.L,,
L-..:$$i0.
3.+ir.g..
t s..
u.
a
.....c 4..
.....a
... e. m,...
..4.,..,.. ;..
- s..., 4 *4.
- t...
... :,. s... n..
4.
. e.
...a.
.a..
.2
..6 c.,. j g.
ge ts.,<
t..
"... ". #.. i.
~#*
h,....,"...#.*.**'
n
.,.... -,. 5., '. V * " C C.'1*w.. *.
t
?-
. : -...../v.e.
A
,q r, C*o l g, a
g...
e.
r.
.r 1..,.
f
.d.
- 4. = &. g. g.., A.
e. gg r.n.
...e
. J. d.
- 6.
g.e..
+
..e e r...... *,.,
.: ;1
,.g,..
a'*
- .I*
..*..t..a*,,,....
".*.r
- e c *l 4 9 * *
- s
.J. L I*.*'* % - *
- m J..,, 4..e. d * *
'a. #.
- 4 eL,
'.a.
?
- J. J. t.
V.
.J 1 s 2 *t O L
_CM tm
' =*=-
=**
-. -' ef?
o
. s?...
r
.~. -.
-. ; w* ;. *
..ag L
1..:.
- ,, A ; m., g g,,. ;.
.. r;;;p..
. g.
v.. r. m. y; r.
-: r 2,
s
,5
. vi
,+
WTELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT DEPARTMENT OCNPP-TOVP By
SUBJECT:
E0I-8001 thru 8006 Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
245 Sumer Street Y-LOCATION:
Boston, MA 02107 ROOM: To be Determined DATE:
October 21, 1982 TIME:
0900 ORGANIZATION Teledyne Engineering Services AGENDA: Discussion of Subject E01's
.s.
ATTENDANCE REQUESTED:
TES, SWEC, OCP 6
C 9
~
tPTELEDYNE.
. ENGINEERING SERVICES 130 SECONO AvtNUE WALTHAM. MA$$ACMU$(TTS C2254 i61 h 890 335c twx i7106 324-7580 t
November 1, 1982 5511-186 (f iQN Mr. G. A. Maneatis, Senior Vice-President s
Facilities Development
'~ -
Pacific Gas and El'ctric Co.
e 77 Beale Street
- fNi San Francisco, California 94106 O
t Mr. H. R. Denton, Director.
y C'M /
\\
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
/
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmission Washington, D. C.
20555 Mr. R. H. Engelken, Regional Adm.inistrator Region V U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94595
Subject:
Revised TES Personnel Assignments Gentlemen:
With the addition of C'onstruction Quality Assurance and the further development of Phase II efforts, I: have determined that a reassignment of certain personnel identified in the Phase II Program Management Plan is desirable.
Therefore, as of this date, Mr. Dean C. Stratouly replaces Mr. L. C.
Noriega as Assistant Project Manager for SWEC efforts.
Thi's revision affects 4.3 of the Plan.
Mr. Stratouly's resume is attached.
He was previously the Review and Evaluation Team Leader for the SWEC Power Division activities.
Mr. Noriega remains.with the Project as the Review and Evaluation Team Leader for the Construction Quality Assurance activity and for the SWEC Power Division efforts, both reporting to Mr. Stratouly.
Very truly yours, TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES William E. Cooper 03 Project Manager - 5511 WEC/1h
,L
";., w,, / s - n oW by,l Attachment p) l gli 99 921101 l
^
e
1 c
NPTELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES i
Messrs. Maneatis, Denton, Engelken 5511-186 November 1, 1982
+
Page Two
.i cc:
E. Denison (RLCA)
R.F. Reedy (RFR)
F. Sestak (SWEC)
R. R. Fray (PG&E)
H.E.Sch,ierling(NRC)(2) 4 i
t 4
9 9
e
'l "RTF1 !: DYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEAN C. STRAT0VLY Senior Engineer Professional Resume Education Massachusetts Maritime Academy, B.S. in Marine Engineering,1952 Experience Massachusetts Legislative Committee on Energy (since April 1977): Director of Research - directed the efforts of committee staff and advised legislative personnel for all energy related matters. This work included the exploration, exploitation and development of energy scurces, and the siting of energy facilities.
General Dynamics Corp./ Electric Boat Division, Groton, CT, (1963 to 1977):
(a) Deputy Program Manager (1975-1977) - responsible for the construction program of nuclear reactor plants in submarines.
Directed engineering, procurement, manuf acturing, installation, inspection.and testing efforts to ensure that the nuclear plant met the contract specifications and was delivered on schedule.
(b) Chief of Mechanical Systems and Components (1973-1975) - directed the efforts of engineers in the development of system design descriptions and fluid flow diagrams (P& ids) of various reactor plant support systems of a land based prototype nuclear reactor plant. Work included plant and equipment arrangements, specification and procurement of ccmponents, instrumentation and controls, piping, schedules, estimates, and contract administration.
Also included was the prepa' ration of the PSAR and FSAR.
Technical requirements were to the ASME B&PVC and the various NRC regulatory guides to the maximum extent possible and as supplemented by Naval Nuclear Design Standards and Codes.
(c)
Chief of Reactor Systems (1969-1973) - directed the engineering and design efforts.for the development of a nuclear submarine reactor plant.
Work included the preparation of fluid flow diagrams, construction drawings, power plant operating manuals, test procedures, equipment technical manuals, and specification and procurement of equipment.
(d)
Senior Nuclear Project Engineer (1964-1969) - developed fluid flow diagrams and system design descriptions. Directed design (draf ting) efforts in the preparation of construction drawings of varicus reacter sysums.
(e) Nuclear Test Engineer (1963-1964) - performed preliminary operation and performance testing of reactor plant systems. Prepared test procedures and schedules. Determined the acceptability of data. Participated in dock and sea trials.
7/82
V(. W u;,
a.
l 01/21/83 l.7 2j
~
h,. -
.~
'.. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,,s,..,,..
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD 4
In the Matter of PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-275 0.L.
50-323 0.L.
(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plan.t UnitNos.1and2)
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL Notice is hereby given that effective January 10, 1983, I withdraw my appearance in the above-captioned proceeding since I am no longer assigne,d responsibility for this proceeding.. All mail and service lists in the above proceeding should be amended to delete my name after that date.
Respectfully submitted, i
rM Donald F. Hasse Counsel for NRC Sta?f Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 21st day of January 1983 I
l 6,%o I
..... e UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 11
' 8EFORE THE' ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
- In the Matter of'
- F V
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-275 0.L.
50-323 0.L.
(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unit, Nos..I and.2)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
[
I hereby certify that copies of " NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL" for Donald F. Hassell in i
the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or, as indicated by an asterisk, through deposit
' in the Nuclear Regulatory Comission's internal mail system, this 21st day of January, 1983.
4,g Dr.IohnH. Buck Dr. Jerry Kline i
1
-Atomic' Safety and Licensing Appeal Administrative Judge Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.,20555 Washington, D.C.
20555
- i.
Dr. W. Reed Johnson Philip A.. Crane, Jr., Esq.
i Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Pacific Gas and Electric Company i
. Board P.O. Box 7442 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Francisco, CA 94120' Washington, D.C.
20555
- l Mr. Frederick Eissler L
i' Mr. Thomas S. Moore, Member Scenic Shoreline Preservation j
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Conference, Inc..
Board
- 4623 More Mesa Drive U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Santa Barbara, CA 93105 l
Washington, D.C.
20555
- Mrs. Raye Fleming L
John F.. Wolf, Esq.
1920 Mattie Road i
Administrative Judge Shell Beach,'CA 93449 Atortic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Richard.E. Blankenburg, Co-publisher t
-Washington, D.C.
20555
- Wayne A. Soroyan, News Reporter South County Publishing Company Mr.~Glenn 0.. Bright P.O. Box aF1 i
Administrative Judge Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
'i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Byron S. Georgiou Washington, D.C.
20555
- Legal Affairs Secretary 1
Governor's Office Elizabeth Apfelberg State Capitol 1415 Cozadero Sacramento, CA 95814 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 l
?
N N
s--
-ww n
,ym n
?., m p
.m,
..lu,
.m,.,ww,e.,
_,pp..go,.,
,,y,e
,p _ y, y pm g n,, n-yw.,._,
m,g,w.,.
m-
. ~
. - +....
-2 Mr.GordonSilher.
Harry M. Willis Mrs. Sandra A. Silver Seymour & Willis 1760 Alisal Street 601 California St., Suite 2100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Francisco, CA 94108 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
Joel R. Reynolds, Esq.
Lawrence Q. Garcia, Esq.
John R. Phillips, Esq.
350 McAllister Street Center for Law in the Public San Francisco, CA 94102 Interest 10951 West Pico Boulevard Mr. James 0. Schuyler Third Floor Nuclear Projects Engineer Los Angeles, CA 90064 Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, CA 94106 Arthur C. Gehr. Esq.
Snell & Wilmer Mark Gottlieb 3100 Valley Center California Energy Commission Phoenix, Arizona 85073 MS-18 1111 Howe Avenue Paul C. Valentine, Esq.
Sacramento, CA 95825 321 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94302 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bruce Norton, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20555
- 3216 North 3rd Street Suite 202 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DahidS.Fleischaker,Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20555
' Docketing and Service Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Richard B. Hubbard Washington, D.C.
20555
- MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue - Suite K Mr. Thomas H. Harris, Energy Writer San Jose, CA 95125 San Jose Mercury News 750 Ridder Park Drive John Marrs,. Managing Editor San Jose, CA 95190
~
San Luis Obispo County Telegram. Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue P. O. h x 112 San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 N
,4}
~
Donald F. Hassell A
Herbert H. Brown Counsel for NRC Staff Kirkpatrick,Lockhart, Hill,l Christopher & Phillips 1900 M Street, N.W.
I Washington, DC 20036
- p.m(o,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a
{
nj WASHINGTON, D, C. 20555
%,...../
JAN 191983 Dr. William E. Cooper Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02254
Dear Dr. Cooper:
Enclosed please find a copy of the transcript of a meeting held on January 6,1983, between members of the NRC Staff and an individual concerning alleged safety deficiencies at the Diablo Canyon Project.
In particular, the stated concerns relate to:
a.
design aspects of the component cooling water system, including its seismic classification, single failure considerations and its heat removal capabilities, and b.
various other considerations including I&C design /
classifications approaches, design approaches used for seismic Class I and Class II interfaces, and the seismic design of diesel, generator intakes and exhausts.
Both the substantive and procedural concerns raised should be factored into the Independent Design Verification Program as appropriate.
The allegations have potential bearing on the currently ongoing verification efforts of both the utility and the IDVP. Accordingly, notification of these allegations was transmitted to the Comission by Board Notification No. 83-03 on January 7,1983 (copy attached).
The alleger has expressly requested and was assured of anonymity to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, as you have agreed, the enclosed transcript is to be treated confidentially. No copies of the transcript should be made and access to the single copy provided should be restricted (and duly documented) to the smallest number of individuals possible consistent with your need to evaluate its contents in conjunction with the IDVP. Appropriate measures to control dissemination of the information should be employed to assure preservation of the anonymity of the alleger.
Sincerely, I
rrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
As stated ran 1 4p cc: Service List (Letter Only)
)
Diablo Canyon Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush Vice President - General Counsel Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 cc: Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Resident Inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS Pacific Gas & Electric Company c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission P. O. Box 7442 P.'O.'80x 369 San Francisco, California 94120 Avila Beach, California 93424 Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
Ms. Raye Fleming California Public Utilities Comission 1920 Mattie Road, 350 McAllister Street Shell Beach, California 93440 San Francisco, California 94102 Joel Reynolds, Esq.
Mr. Frederick Eissler, President John R. Phillips, Esq.
Scenic Shoreline Preservation Center for Law in the Public Interest Conference, Inc.
10951 West Pico Boulevard 4623 More Mesa Drive Third Floor Santa Barbara, California 93105 Los Angeles, California 90064 Ms. Elizabeth Apfelberg Paul C. Valentine. Esq.
1415 Cozadero 321 Lytton Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Palo Alto, California 94302,
Mr. Gordon A. Silver Mr. Byron S. Georgiou Ms. Sandra A. Silver Legal Affairs Secretary 1760 Alisal Street Governor's Office San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 State Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Harry M. Willis Esq.
Seymour & Willis Herbert H. Brown Esq.
601 California Street Suite 2100 Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P.C.
San Francisco, CA 94108 1900 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Mr. Richard Hubbard MHB Technical Associates Mr. Dick Blankenburg Suite K Editor & Co-Publisher 1725 Hamilton Avenue South County Publishing Company San Jose, CA 96125 P. O. Box.460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram Tribune Mr. James 0. Schuyler 1321 Johnson Avenue Vice President - Nuclear Generation P. 0. Box 112 Department San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Pacific Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 l
e
', Mr; Malco13 H Furbush
-t-Bruce Norton, Esq.
Suito 202 3216 North 3rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Mr. W. C. Sangloff Westinghouse Electric Corporation P. 0. Box 355 Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15230 David F. Fleischaker Esq.
P. O. Box 1178 Oklahoma Cit,y, Oklahoma 73101 Arthur C. Gehr. Esq.
Snell & Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. Owen H. Davis, Director l_
Federal Agency Relations
[
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 105017th ' Street, N.W.
Suite 1180 Washington, D. C.
20036 i
Regional Administrator - Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission 1450 Maria Lane Sulte 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Dr. Jose Roesset 3506 Duval Road Austin, Texas 78759
{
-I
',J I
94 e,,
k 4
0 4
4 3
3
- o
DISTRIBUTION w.o ekda H. Denton E. Case Document Control 50-275 JAN 1 g 19g3 R. Mattson NRC POR R. Vollmer L PDR R. Engleken NSIC Dr. William E. Cooper E. Jorden PRC System Teledyne Engineering Services 130 Second Avenue LB#3 Reading Jordon, IE Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 JLee Taylor IE
.M ACRS(16)
Dear Dr. Cooper:
BBuckley TMNovak Attorney, OELD DGEisenhut Enclosed please find a copy of the transcript of a meeting held on January 6,1983,,between members of the NRC Staff and an individual concerning alleged safety deficiencies at the Diablo Canyon Project.
In particular, the stated concerns relate to:
a.
design aspects of the component cooling water system, including its seismic classification, single failure considerations and its heat removal caphbilities, and b.
various other considerations including I&C design /
classifications approaches, design approaches used for seismic Class I and Class II interfaces, and the seismic design of diesel generator intakes and exhausts.'.
Both the substantive and procedural concerns raised should be factored into the Independent Design Verification Program as appropriate.
The allegations have potential bearing on the currently ~ ongoing verification efforts of both the utility and the IDVP. Accordingly, notification of these allegations was transmitted to the Connission by Board Notification No. 83-03 on January 7,1983 (copy attached).
The alleger has expressly requested and was assured of anonymity to the extent pennitted by law. Consequently, as you have agreed, the enclosed transcript is to be treated confidentially. No copies of the transcript should be made and access to the single copy provided should be restricted (and duly documented) to'the smallest number of individuals possible consistent with your need to evaluate its contents in conjunction with the IDVP. ' Appropriate measures to control dissemination of the information f'
should be employed to assure preservation of the anonymity of the alleger.
Sincerely, I
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 9+uhe nt.
- See previous concurrence.
OL:L8v3 0L:L8#3*
OELO*
DL RAD OL: q As....,s..ta ted
> e omc >
p
..g 9,.
eua=aus >.9%....
ff
. g.
g.).............g.y......)........
.7
..f onn p we romu sio om meu ca.o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom i u-na o
'RTELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERViQES MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT DEPARTMENT DCNPP-IDVP BY R.F. REEDY, INC.
SUBJECT:
Sta tus of audit of DCP 0. A. Procram (Nov.,11 - Dec. 7.1982)
.- C-N ;1.
LOCATION: 50 Beale St., San Francisco, Ca.
ROOM: 2nd Floor, F & G i
DATE:
January 5.1983 TIME:
10:00 a.m.
ORGANIZATION R.F. Reedy. Inc:Diablo Canyon Proiect: Teledyne Enoineering Services 1.
Introduction and discussion of scope and method of audit.
AGENDA:
2.
Summary of results of verification audit of corrective action of:
(a) DCP office design activities (b) Site decign activities
> 3.
Prese.ntation of observations and findings.
4.
Discussion of audit status and continuing activities.
f ATTENDANCE REQUESTED:
315Ef.S u~n -,
DCP q,y m,'.; . :.
m...- f a
.. e p. -
RFR, Inc.
TES tW l
i VQ Mk
- i. hk.cA l
W rAAS$
/
W, _7Jo dfr A l
1 n
b W-@
[. biNog h,
3 L