ML20210P515

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Briefs in Support of Exceptions Filed by Governor Brown & Joint Intervenors in Plant Proceeding.Comments Requested by 821206
ML20210P515
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/1982
From: Hassell D
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To: Perry S
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Shared Package
ML20209B723 List:
References
FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8702130405
Download: ML20210P515 (35)
v • d • e


Text

.g

, 4 a

_ c. ,. .-

  • i

'Y E' g .

'g. ;f DISTRIBUTION D.Hassell GCunningham/JMurray' (W OELD FF (2)

November 18, 1982 B.Buckley W irley M.Sweency LChandler Spence W. Perry, Esq. ,

Acting. Assistant General Counsel .. STurk Federal Emergency Management Agency Myarman ,

u? ' 500 C Street,.N.W.

a Washington, DC 20001 y .

s In the Matter of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-275 OL and 50 323,0L

- 1 2

Dear Spence:

,I

'I e

Enclosed are copies of the brie's in support of exceptions that have been filed by Governor Brown and Joint Intervenors in the Diablo Canyon proceeding. Please review both briefs and provide me with your ccaments, if any, no later than December 6,1982.

For yr:ur information, I have also enclosed a copy of the NRC Staff brief for the Diablo Canyon proceeding which was filed on November 12, 1982.

Sincerely, 8702130405 870203 _.

PDR FOIA Donald F. Hassell HOLMES86-151 PDR Counsel for NRC . Staff

Enclosures:

As stated \

r >

IFC :0EUh '  :

OEp  : uttu y :  :  :  :

H___:___ ___:__ _________:____________:____________.____________.____________.___________

FAME:DFHa 1s: SAikby :EChristenbury:  :  :  : :

H___: __,________:____________:____________:____________.____________.____________.___________

TATE:11dE/82  : 11/VI/82 :11/l9/82  :  :  :  :

y ,.

glCl

.b.

w p

.t.

..y

.r. ..

f .J

[ i

u. o.

g oc c(- Or .

5 . . . .

y>

  • 0 .

g .(g h h .,

s 1 cs D=.rt .

  • a;

. .. .. . . .;. t ,

. .-. .. . .s 3. C. . ,Ie. w.... .c.e:L.:.c v.*r:. %.

~ . . . .

., ,. ,,. 4

.f..-.... .. .

+

, .... -.. . . - - e.a.. . ., .ror-. e ; ..s A

. .C e r .  ;. 5

. *  :.O

. ,. . _ "-* :S " -?. _ n - 'a 3 . . .

s. u c s

...- r. ,.. 4e .a C. s r. :. .* t. w. .- : t*

C =awa.cs C set: e. sat : s

~

C o::.+c4 : .,,,,...:in :.* :: u : e.cz L -

STATUS c' '.' A S E N OT E EE*~ M Y~UK ._.

s < . .:.

4,.em=

.. ,.  : ._ e :. :~s .

.g . ~.e... y,::w -

Pa*.t'**

  • . am- th :Ms C CC**t: icms f b Wst h NCowaTI %

t :. :: . m -

a***t*vto as PTvtstO (i [ h'(([

. n t wac:L*Tasu ,,,,,.

. .c me, L,j g y eus i ,,, ==..cunas  :

-o,., n n n . < . , , _. s . ,

a. . .-....._....-_._..w.

. _ . . a . . . = n. _ . _, -

~ ...a,,_ e _c. .. . . . . .

nas.un:: irem t ; eara. carte C =vac>. ass o= ascassan- .mw s

ee"a: R* r-c ovc.;u. mea--v.

  • r evu ae ca ac s.

. O e kass L.n a v.m r.u:: -

7

C assazz r ;..u - r+w s ar* .:v=:n. zs . u.cac r.u ar-wru e canes or L.,pc euw c cr. , ,,,,,. : . . n . _. . . ; , r ;. ai.
O m.aast e: .-:. c..a c:
  • L > er - s -. va . . . -

.e. v wa **-+ ova. c a c= = uns.

C tzasa e<w +_soss ete: e := m.a v. .- . 4. ; - ; 3, .: 4 ar va~.~o **.c abc :st: c -v ce .  ?.~ s . . . .

C wr ?= ; - - r . :=? *em s et
  • s::c = . - u * -:. a va m?aamo.s. ie ~ct. *s.za s e ./ v ss .

s e- - =.cs .-:=c.s c. *.e s. . c - =t e- rt:a r vn* c=.=en.wr.e.s ne. mars cve vs.ows a eseen u~ari u: n. c.y: ar -t =t -: : - =%c . .

' !M PC RTANT -v.ests: oa any evac =4s.=anevision es amwe to =vooev=cer.s.

. . s.rru =e o e =awer>. i=ve sa a ww c>.assa wiu. ce=siosa roes ervisicas =*os a v-our ecsv. .

.,k m

1,

.c .-.-..

.a .v... .r.... p w . .r .m. .- .- m ---.. . ..----  ?

. ... .s.:.c

_d h ;e DL r .- . ,..

C.M .12.:.t 3.

_-_l,...a .L .w_ .- e:_ .

Dh. .. e

,wm...',_.C*

. ?:- . . . . L.. . .e.._:.-,... .

..2..

g

.-a . rays.--...-a. . p, . . . , . s.,.....

"a=i, u g f . .. . .... ., $ e.,. e 9 _4 .e.

. . . e 2 L . 1.

i. ..s. ._ _ e . . a f 4 . . .. ;. .

.u.

a 2

~ D C'.".> C.-. .-

  • 9 "3 "- . T. i. . c ..m e ? .4 1e.- nC . .B r.:
  • k. 6 a _

-. C ... r.i ,. u.a.1 _4

. ,. ...;. y c-.. m. / i s; .. .c . . .

-. ., Cn.s .e . _ t yy -

s.e. nJ} . a n ..,  : C' . . . a .s . .. e. n.s'...

&g ,.y.. r. g ... . %.. . y.*.: e . g ..w 6. u. . .

p e._ .4... , _. e c* .... e c. . . %.r. 1.e .e,% . _ o .e,

. a.-4u. 4.. .J. u:. - 4_e p.-..- e.e.s. _n _._... . . .me .%.... . ...._

_a <_ s ..

... . 1,._.%

,. n , .- . . -- ..,a.'c .e. u ~ . e s ~. .k2._' .n'. ti. . ~ ~.~- . .

~ _ ~ .=...=.i' .-.. . . ...

c c . . ' '- .. . .c . .~ . c .ca- r.. *-_c ' _* ". i . As c e "".. , c ' . r * ' .%. '.~.. ~, _ s .n

- - ..~ . '. .- .. c. ~~ :* .....c...

usec or cciculations =sy not have been -4,- taken to ec : cle 'c . c es ablii.- I'. l.

co n .., s :Lc _._ _.. . .

..w. . . e _ u. .m.. u._ _..m. _ i *4 . _. ns_ 3 c e. _ e ._ _ ; _ . , ,.. ,, .<.:<m_,

(Can~w ' n 'c' m. .. ~. ~. ~ =.' ' .o.' M. .

V e . ..._; . ,.. . * .. ;--.=:

n ,A -s ." t-

. U

,y . v. , g -u...

u.a , ., j, a . .u.

.m2 s. . %. ,_ .. . .....u...

. , ,. .  :. v-.... .. .. ,. . :...

l . :. . y _ , ,. _ . . . . - . . . . ... . .

\

r.

w 4 . e>

_ .e.e

',EC o c r i

yb ...ec..<per

^

u.s.< .. g ..

~ '-

1:Grcsn . 2,  % .

.v.,c...~....,.

9 .g. . ..

-2.

?.

. .

  • 4 .. . . . . ..a-

- .% J 0 .. , . e

- -u

s r * *

  • 4 e

.h. e d .

. A <

.... . . .. .e

...w..4. . J..*. ... . .s

. e.

., r n. .,. .. .

.. .,- s . ...- .

b..,. . .c 3 g

  • 9.,. .f . .. g ee . . .. . *. _....

,.J

  • * * * * * - --+ .J ..,s . . .

, , . 4.... .. . . . .. .

a . n... .. .. ...t.. .... a.., n .

EG Esference 's5** Packs;e 50. ?cce No.

. _, ., . > e.n.

o .. . , ,. ..

m. .

v.n. .... .

. s. c.. I t,. .. .

8015 '. ?-1-25 25-1 to 25-21 8031 '?-1-31 31-F.-l to 2:-E *-

d O

e

o

.s> , .

  • h

.' , 4,lp!.%*"I 1 t.".h. ,j.~]>'s/*I a .. .ill. . ..

.b h. Fub3? . SET! .E.?>--

13* SitCf.D 4!YJE -

m u u .stex -ess s e m

.c rx 2+-n.c b.~.:+ x

., ., e . .

'W " .nj gi :.N.m; .,],1;p g,Q)_.

A .w;.

October 22,1G2

"[

5511-185-Mr._H. H. Brown, Esq.

Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher, & Phillips

19CO 11 Street, fl.W. ..

Washington, D.C. 2003G

Subject:

Response to H. H. Brown Letter of Octobar 12, 1932

'Ocar tir. Brown:

Dr. Cooper, as Project f.ianager ' for the DCUPP-IDVP," has - revicu:d your request and. asked that I respond'as follo.n.

Tb n ?crenced letter requests: .

a explanation of the process and chronology cT events by hich Teledyne discussed with PG&E, Scchtel, Stone 'and Habster, and/or others the subject of a Construction Quelity Assurance (CQA) review of Diablo Canyon.

2. An explanation of the process and nature of negotiations niid discussions with PG&E, Cechtel, ;nd/cr othe.s pursuant to which Teledyne undertook to perform such revieu.
3. Copics of any correspondence 'Teledync has und with PGLE, Bechtel, Stone and Webster, and/or others concerning the foregoing, including particularly cny acterials related to the scope and content of the. Construction QA Program.
4. Copics of 'Teltdyne's contracts and subcontraci.s with P G'.E and/or others for the Construction QA.progrcm. .

~

5. An explanatien of the relationship between Tel dyae cnd Ston.

and Webster regarding the CQA program, and copics of. cay correspondence and agreements with Stone and Webster.

Our responses are intended to be clarific dions as intended by M..

Denton's ictter of Sepi.e. m ber 29, 1982, to the extent thtt yeer rypusts pertain to inforn atinn in the public domain. f r. Denton's letter exen. pts comr.unications solely with respect to financial and administrative aspec ts . In the main, the responses arc based upon our public statements ENGINEERS AND MCTALuinGISTS

7 Mr. H. H. Brown, Esq. . SpTMy[NE October 29,19S2 ggg,g gg.g;g Page 2  :

made on Septerrhar 1, Octobtr 7, and October 19-20, 1982 and the public cocrespandence bat..eca tiie varic'qs parties. Sc. ace re .pc.iding to i.h2 3 specific q:.".tions, a clarification with respect to the second p:.ragrph '.

of tin reference letter may be helpf ul. That paragraph appear to place .

a dif fe. ent connotation on the term "adjunc t", as in th citic %ijuct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance", than ucs intended. The quoted Webster definition of adjunct contained on the first ter.t page.of.the CQA Program Plan is: "Something joined or added to another .ttiisgetsst nit, essentially a part of it." The CQA program is the "scmething", the Phase 11 IDVP is the "another thing", and the first is not " essentially a part" of the second because the CQA program is not required by the fiRC !.etter to which Phase II responds. Instead, the CQA has been volunteered by PG&E and the IDVP has " joined er added" the volunteered technical work to Phase 11 for purposes of progrcm management . CQA is an adjunct, not a collateral program.

~

The following chronological presentation is intended to be responsivo to the first two of your reg:ests, cnd covers the third because the public correspondence identified is already availchle to you.

1. TES' first knowledge of CQA was a.telecon from f/.r. Maneatis to Dr. Cooper the evening of August 30, 1982. Mr. Maneatis stated that PG&E was considering.volur.teering the CQA program in the

' meeting with r2C to be held on September 1,1952 ar.d requestcd that Dr. Cooper visit with Fr. Maneatis on his arrival in Saa Francisco on the af ternoon of August 31, 1932. There was cisa a brief discussion of the details discussed in the next itca.

2. Dr. Cooper visited with Mr. Maneatis en the afternoon of August 31, 1932. Mr. Maneatis gave Dr. Cooper a copy of the Region V memo to Mr. Denton dated March 29, 1982 identifying the Regica V concern, stated that the decisica had been n.cda to volunteer a program in respcase to item 3 of the Regica V .rma, and stated the PG1E desire to place this program under IDVP Man ageT,an t . Dr. Cooper responded .that the IDVP would ecccpt the management of the CQA program if PG&E would fully d: fine the scope they were voluntacring, if the v;crk could be conducted by Stone and Habster Engineering Corporation (SWEr) as cn active and qualified IDVP pceticipent, if TES and S'. .; ~

found nothing disagreeable about the pecposed : cope, and if the CQA work could be conducted in accordance with the IDV?

program management plan.

3. On the . basis of their decision and the IDVP willingncss to manage the progria, the CQA progem was announced by Mr.

Maneatis at the meeting with the f3C on September 1,1952 (Tr.

p. 10-11).
4. PGLE (Crane). advised t"'C (Eisenhut) by letter dated Septe,M,-

7,1932 that PG1E was proceeding to imple m nt tha prcpesai that a CQA program be conductd as part of Ph2se II of the IDVP.

. ._ u.- 1

~

.-,s ? y \

t

. H. H. Brown Esq.

m<*.s I C d V 83 *sr- -

["N-ober29,1982 0 . ENGINEERING SEiWiME

~

Page,3 -

5. .Tha next significant result-- froin this process was TES sub.ailtai (letter 5511-149 dated Septer.;ber 25,-1922) for PG?4 approval. and inc. information-~and .coments of a Progrm Plan

. .f or t.enstructioa -Quality Assurance. The' process used to develop this submittal followed that implied by -itein 2: .4

a. .DCP telecopied a Preliminary Program Description to TES on September. 2,1982. TES reviewed this document, found '

it.to be reasonable, and hand carried.a copy to SWEC f # .'

their review in preparation for a meeting: the .following day. ~

b. - On the morning of September 8,1982 Messrs. Maneatis and >

Friend visited TES for the purpose of discussing the CQA-concept, and other . administrative aspects. The term

~

" adjunct" was developed during this discussion - to '

distinguish the CQA aspects from those covered by the !T.C Phase II letter. Oa~that afternoon, Messrs. Maneatis, ,

Friend,- Noriega and. Cooper visited SWEC (Massrs. Wild, Kelley, Warren, Richardson, and .Sestak) to revieu the proposed scope and' integrati'on into .the 10VP program.

Based upon this meeting, the IDVP ' agreed to: accept the

- assignment, to prepare a program description adopting the PGSE-proposed scope, and to integrate the CQA with the Phase II program management plan. ,

c. TheI CQA Program plan wat developed in parallel by TES and by SUEC. The TES contribution primarily.related to th:

management aspects of the CQA plen and became Sections .

1.0, 2.0 (partial), and 4.0 7.0 of the plan. The SUEC contribution was developed in discussions with TES 'and

- with DCP (Sec. Sa), was provided to DCP on September 17, 1932 (TES letter 5511-131) as a Program Description which -

became Sections 2.0 (partial) and 3.0 of the CQA plan.- 'In integrating the two documents, word changes were raade by TES in the SWEC contribution concerning the treatment of Potent.ial Findings to assure censistency with IDVP precedures. _

6. PG&E approved the TES proposal with ccmcnts. by lettee cr October 7,1982, folleuing verbal approva.1 on October 5,1912.

On the latter date TES letter 5511-161 transmitted the CGA Program Plan to all parties.

With respect to the fourth and fif th requests of the referenced letter, TES considers these to address financial and admin is trat ive aspects outside of the scope of Mr. Denton's letter. However, it should be noted that the relationships between PGTE and/or Cechtel and the 10VP, and' the relationships between TES and SWEC, are not changed by the existence of the CQA program.

' ~

. Mr. H. H. Brcwn', Esq. .

'#PTELEDYNE

- Oct:ber 29, 1982 .

ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 4-The addition of the CQA program to the IDVP in no way changes the independence of the IDVP.

Very truly yours, TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES I

~

AldieE.Johgson,Jr.,VicePresident Internal Services, Project 5511 ,

AEJ:cjr cc: W.E. Cooper G.A. Maneatis R.R. Fray h.R. Denton R. Engelken H. Schierling 5511 Document Control o

a a m a y - a a

h - -

s*

~~~

CTONE & WEGOTER ENGIN"IERING CORPORATION

p. o. sox asas. sosToN. MArrACHUE"jTTD Ca17.7
  • ^reNovember 4. 1982
  • o "*14296 o o.

'7"

"'DCS-141 me .

viA Dr. W. E. Cooper DEAR SIRS:

TES Document Control r ,ouow o . G arrac ... O sear s.aaaars'v Project 5511

- TO Teledyne Engineering Services _1,e.,,,, _ ,,,,,,, _ ,,,,,,,,,c,, ,, _ M ",,*,y* W e, .

saca o-130 Second Avenue '

Waltham, MA 02254 O omaw os O s caicati ~s I O occu .n. O orese,co . ca L

i PLEASE NOTE l SENT POR YOUR STATUS O ===. O a aov.o O a v o~s O o-soo~s- O a, ova. O co--=~r aov = as a.v.s.o ' , = , = ' , ' , ' " , ' " ,O , , aoomeas

,,, O co===crio~s O us. E - a-ario .

O asu-aaar O~ -

O O co-cu===~cs O o co--=~r O u aceserast. O co--.~rs O ita.

O O

O suoossrio~s as a.orno YOUR ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING:

RatsASs0 POR: O ,*.a.cirioa O ui.c ase o, ~ esssaar -ar==.a's a-es a aaooucis's. - cao '- =aru== caaos.

O ~ tmase ==v s aae su===

O t=ase sus-e ==vs ==aaoove .'as' -cao>' aa.rva caoso- Ooecu-=~rs O ==aw. os O n e o raa.

==ru== oas co r eac- o ra.s = area.46 ==aamo voua . ova 6 ea co--.~rs O assis 0 t=4s= aca~owts o= ==ce r oa r s -arsaias sv =>o-~o mao ==vu==~o r . =~ctoseo ee v o, r- s ca-O we raust ruar ri.ess mores Aas = accomone.cs wirw woua unosasvanomo. i aior. tsass aaviss us.

saouto aar nevisso= ro occu-surs on omawmas asvuanso =s ew ru mvo6ve a a.ca me ease. rue su usa -ust moviev svoe.s =

IMPORTANT weestea vacnasmo on aar-sur witwm run no oars even twoua a os = ra ssrmara c4==or se onve= ar rwe rme. orasawiss. rat evacmassa wiu consioen rus navisions -mos wirwour cost. .

NOTES OF CONFERENCE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM PHASE II TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIABLO CANYON' NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - UNIT 1 The attached Notes of C'onference document the important aspects of the Scheduled Meeting held in SWEC's office on 10/21/82. ,

f I s very truly yours, , g., 6 V l

M ( W G$ .

l F. Sestak, Jr. ,, ,

Project Manager, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant ,.g m .;

t

/

Copies to: ,

i GAManeatis (enc) 70 .. 'v. OS Jr ,  :.<

a -

.i

-g.

bj l

.,1) ew e. 4 4

DD *

-==-------+=---_mm_ . . , _ _ . _ , _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ , , , , _ _ , , . _ _

r NOTES OF CONFERENCE J.O. No. 14296

!- DIAELO CANTON UNIT 1 l

INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM PHASE II (IDVP)

Bald at the offices of Stone & Webster Present for:

Engineering Corporation Boston, MA Bechtel

  • October 21, 1982
1. Chang Diablo Canyon. Project' (DCP)

E. Connell, III

.- R. Fray Quadrax Corporation .

G. M. Leonard R. Naymark D. Munson R. A. Uffer State of California G. Fine Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)

I D. Graves J. E. Krechting E. F. Heneberry J. M. Oddo 4

D. L. Post C. O. Richardson ,

F. Sestak, Jr.

F. J. Rezendes

~

S. P. Sekerak Teledyne Engineering Service (TES)

L. C. Noriega -

L. Semprucci M. Revett '

D. Stratouly U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC)

. Pulsipher ,

H. Walker e

Ah me ee m o ,,mw

    • * * * = =

~

REFERENCES .

z , ,

I .

. e 1. DCP letter DCVP-SWEC-199., dated Septemberf27, 1982

, .2. TES document, describing meeting format (attached)

'b \ '

. PURPOSE The ourpose of the meetina va'sito discuss the basis of the NSC analyses and the DCP

~

' resoonse to the SWEC menerated.E0Ils 8001 through 8006 (Reference 1). .

DISCUSSION Mr. F. Sestak, Jr. (SWEC) began the meeting with a brief introduction. This was

-followed by an opening statement of the meeting format by TES (Reference 2). All in attendance introduced themselves and identified the organization they represent.

Mr. J. Oddo read _E0I's 8001 thro _ ugh .8006 .and .coened the meeting for discussion.__.

of 8001. In response to E0I 8001, Mr. Uffer (Quadrex) and.Mr. Connell (DCP) generally r agreed that the CONTEMPT program produced an incorrect temperature. They believe that this was an isolated case resulting from improper input and numerical instabili- ^

ties with the code (CONTEMPT). - Quadrax stated that prop'er results could have been obtained by altering either the input parameters (e.g. vent area and friction factors)

_,9r by reducing the time step size.

SWEC reiterated its written position. SWEC'further stated that a time step sensitivity 1- study has been performed with CONTEMPT and the results showed that air inflow occurs

independent of the time step chosen. SWEC also stated that the vent area is a fixed i physical parameter and should not be changed.

The discussion proceeded, to input parameters to CONTEMPT describe *d in E0I's 8002._ .

1 8003, and 8004. Quadrex reiterated Ithe validity of applying a moisture ent.rainment mode,1 in,_t,ha SG blowdown., SWEC made several c1hrifying and supporting statements for

_the_nece,s_si.ty.of performing additional break size investigations if the entrainment podel is used. ,

SWEC noted that the turbine building analysis, performed by SWEC,did not necessarily identify the worst case or highest temperature which could be postulated'to occur but

.resulted in a temperature higher than was previously calculated as the worst case by NSC.

~

Quadrex stated that their aM.yses met all of the requirements in force at the time of their performance and that there was no requirement at that time to comply with NUREG-0588 (and IE Bu'flet1n 79-013) . SWEC pointed out that, subsequently, the'NRC

-- ~

i l

required PG&E to evaldate compliance with these documents, and PG&E had stated that the NSC analyses previously ' supplied by PG&E to the NRC were in compliance with NUREG- _

0588.

6 The discussion proceeded to E0I 8005, flooding analysis. Mr. D. Munson (Quadrex) ~

4 stated that the NSC analysis is so conservative as to completely bound all of the 'er-ri:iE stated in the E0I. SWEC stated that, although this may be true, the errors dis-cussed in the E0I must be explicitly addressed in a revision to the analysis.

i'

  • The discussion of E0I 8006 resulted in a clarification. SWEC pointed out that the .

4000 ft2 vent area from the turbine .bu11 u ding to atmosphere used by. NSC could not be

_,, verified since no documentation,was submit,ted by_the DC?. SWEC has calculated a vent ,

. araa of approximately 1700 ft2, which was supported by the inspection of the plant.

T a.

Eh M%

44Q. - , - . . _ ,

..e. ,

It was decided by'TES to allow discussion of EDI's 8033 and 8034. Regarding entrainment, Quadrez discussed swelling and bubble collapse in the SG. SWEC dis-cussed the methods utilized by Westinghouse to model the steam generator. SWEC also stated that the steam separator should have been included in the steam generator model developed by NSC. SWEC defined entraimnant as occurring when the enthalpy of the effluent is less than that of dry steam, considering the appropriate conditions.

In the discussion of E0I 8034, SWEC stated that the NSC analysis did not account for the effect of adjacent compartments.

A general comment by Mr. Connell (DCP) was made concerning the IDVP classification of

~

the errors found in analy'ses. Mr. Connell believed that some of the errors should have been classified by SWEC as "C" or "D" type errors, rather than "A" or "B" errors.

SWEC reiterated its written, position regarding error classification.

~

. ACTION REQUIRED

~

TES. to provide SWEC vritten direction for addressingihe iiCP responses.' ~

JH0ddo:RL Attachment r

-l . g m

O

/

e

-*esi.

I --

.  !.' r-ENG2a2x!NG SaiVICES 3 A for "This meeting between the IDVP and l'c' d - was called by_

the purpose of d**^n MN W &<berbef*'^l Sin ft 7~' a /oe> / #Ar i - /d: b ,

a In accordance with the

  • The participants are the IOYP and # O - .

29, 1982, the NRC guidelines of Mr, Denton's letter to TES of Sept.

staff and the non-PG&E recipients of that letter were informed of this .

We also recognize that any meeting, and may be present as ' observers.

NRC staff members present have regulatory functions which they may wish With the specific exceptions identified to exercise during the meeting. '

working meeting, not a public meeting above, this is an IDVP- .9c'#

As called, conducted and documented in accordance with NRC procedures.

<*H '#c ' has the right to include, as physical host for this meeting, an observer, or exclude any non-participant or non-invited observer."

n 6

e 9

e OM %4 e n

REGULATURf INF0kMAT10f4 CISTHIcUTION SYSTEta (FIDS)

ACCESSION NoR:821201020o OUC.DATE: 82/11/26 NOTARIZto: NC DOCKET a FACIL:50-275 Diaolo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Pacific ba 05000275 AUTH.NAME AUTHUR AFFILIATION CCOPER,h.E. Teledyn'e Engineering Services RECIP.NAML RECIPItNT AFFILIAT10t.

'0ENTON,H.R. Office of Nuclear Reactor Reculation, Director EAGELKEN,R.H. Region 3, Office of Director MANEATIS,G.A. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

SLBJECT: Forwards "Indepenuent Design verification Program Semimonthly Status Hept for Nov 1982."

OISTRIBUTION CODE: 0013S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR __ EACL SIZE:_. .

TITLE: DiaDlo Canyon (50-275) Incepencent Design Verification Program NCTES:J Hanchett icy POR Occuments. 05000275 RECIPIENT GOPIES RECIPIENT COPIES 10 CODE /NAFE tTTR ENCL 10 CODE /NAFE LTTR CMCL hRH LB3 BC 1 0 NRR Lo3 LA i 1 ,

BUCKLEY,B. Do 1 1 INTERhAL: ELU/HOS1 1 0 IE/DEP/EPLO 11 1 1 IE10EQA__ DIN 1 1 IE/ORP OIk 1 1 dWRh'SCHTFRLTEEi 1 1 NRR/DE/CE6 12 1 1 NRH/0E/EQB 13 1 1 NRR/DE/GB 14 1 1 NRR/DE/MEO 13 2 2 NRR/DE/ GAB 16 1 1 NRR/DE/SEB 11 1 1 NRR/OSI/ASB 18 1 1 NRR/OSI/ICSR 1 1 NRR/OSI/PS8 1 1 REG FILE 04 1 1 RGNS 08 2 2 RM/00AMI/MIB 1 0 EXTERhAL: ACHS 19 lb 16 FEMA-REP OIV 1 1 LPUR 03 2 2 NRC POR 02 1 1 NSIC 05 1 1 NTIS 1 1 NOTES: 1 1 l

G e

TUTAL NUMdEk UF CUPIES kEwulotC: LTTR 4S ENCL 42

"#TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT DEPARTMENT DCNPP-IDVP BY W. E. Cooper /TES

SUBJECT:

E0Is Pertaining to Annulus Structure.

Teledyne Engineerinj~

-' Services LOCATION: Walttiami MA ROOM: Main Conference Room DATE:

November 12, 1982 TIME: 0900 - 0400 ORGANIZATION Teledyne Engineering Services AGENDA: Review Corrective Action Plans with respect to Annulus Structure.

UNCONTROLLED Copy ATTENDANCE REQUESTED: TES, DCP, RLCA, BNL, NRC l

, , - . . , - - . . , ,- ,v.. . . . . - .- R , ,

6 g .

RF. REEDY, INCORPORATED 236 N. Santa Cruz Avense '

Ios Gatos, California 95030 * (408) 354-9110

. s

. l November 15, 1982 Dr. W. E. Cooper TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES 130 Second Avenue Waltham, MA 02254

Subject:

RPR, Inc. October 3rd Friday Look Ahead Report

Dear Dr. Cooper:

Regarding the RFR, Inc. audit of the DCP's implementation of their QA Program, it is planned that an audit exit meeting will be held with the DCP personnel on or about December 10,.1982.

The Diablo Canyon site portion of the corrective action audit is planned to start November 29, 1982. ,

Very truly yo s oge F. eedy, P.E R. . REEDY, INC.

RFR:na cc: F. Sestak E. T. Denison l -.

tb ~

o Lel Roger F. Reedy, P.E. - Engineenng Consulung v

f

,- - - , , - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - .,,,,,- - , ,a,- y

,( ,

~

, .e ,

^

November 15, 1982 Third Friday Report Disbursement List d cc: H. Schierling-(2).

- Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ,

'U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MarylandT20114 1

R. Fray-Diablo Canyon Verification Program. Manager PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

'215 Market Street g

.' LSan Francisco, CA 94106 ,

.'.F..Sestak, Jr.

Chief Power Engineer

' STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1245 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 03107 ar ~ R '. L. Cloud -

R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES

~125. University-Avenue -

Berkeley, CA 94710

- E. Denison *

~

    • RL.. . CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710.

ECH. Brown

- KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M. Street, N.W. -

Washngton, D.C. 20036 D. F. Fleischaker P.O. Box 1178

- Oklahoma City,.OK 73101 J. Reynolds CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 10951 W. Pico Blvd. -

Suite 300 .

Los Angeles, CA 90064 c.

B. Norton NORTON,' BURKE, BERRY & FRENCH, P.C.

3216 N. 3rd Street Suite 300 -

Phoenix, AZ 85012' A. C. Gehr .

i e

O

  • 4,  %- .,*; -.,&*-.****?, ,

e , - -

,._,,.~,.y, l -- e. , , , .-,.4 , , , , , , , ,.--.w . , _ . , , - , , -, -.m ,n ~,,,m-m, -

=.

SNELL & WILMER' 3100 Valley Bank Center Phoenix,. AZ 95073 i

i

, oo. ,.

I t

t

. me I

.i

.i

'i- .

. . .. a

,Y 2e

" j RE. REEDY, INCORPORATED

?.36 N. Santa Cruz Avende -

Los Gatos, California 95030 * (408) 354-9110 November 15, 1982 '

Dr. W. E. Cooper TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES 130 Second Avenue Waltham, MA 02254

Subject:

RFR, Inc. October 3rd' Friday Look Ahead Report

Dear Dr. Cooper:

Regarding the RFR, Inc. audit of the DCP's implementation of their QA Program, it is planned that an audit exit meeting will be held with the DCP personnel on or about December 10, 1982.

The Diablo Canyon site portion of,the corrective action audit is planned to start November 29, 1982. ,

very truly yo s oge F. eedy, P.E R. . REEDY, INC.

RFR:na cc F. Sestak E. T. Denison one o le ie Roger F. Reedy, P.E. - Engtncertng Consulung fj n e

e-

~

e .

November- 15, 1982 Third Friday Report-Disbursement List j c cc: H. Schierling (2) l

- Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ,

l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l 7920 Norfolk Avenue-Bethesda, Maryland 20114 R. Fray Diablo Canyon Verification Program Manager -

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 215 Market Street

, San Francisco, CA 94106 .

F. Sestak, Jr..

ichief Power Engineer

' STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

,245. Summer Street

' Boston, Massachusetts 03107

'R'. L. Cloud R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Ei Denison -

    • -R'.'L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue B'erkeley, CA 94710 H.lH. Brown

- KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M. Street, N.W. -

Washngton, D.C. 20036 D. F. Fleischaker P.O. Box 1178

. Oklah~oma City, OK 73101 J.'Reynolds CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 10951 W. Pico Blvd. -

Suite 300 .

Los Angeles, CA 90064 B. Norton NORTON, BURKE, BERRY & FRENCH, P.C.

3216 N. 3rd Street Suite 300 -

Phoenix, AZ 85012 A. C. Gehr O

em m en

  • me e P
  • '. 1

>. I s l SNELL & WILMER 3100 Valley Bank Center Phoenix,. AZ 95073 J

i e

i t

t i

4

{ oo. .-

t

- t.

').

i, h

h l

l Ii l

i l

i t

- ~

R.F. REEDY, INCORPORATED 236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Im Gatos, California 95030 * (408) 354-9110 November 15, 1982 Dr..W. E. Cooper TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES 130 Second Avenue Waltham, MA 02254 RPR, Inc., November Program Manager's Report -

- 3rd Friday Report

~ Dear Dr. Cooper Enclosed please find the RFR, Inc. , November Program Manager's Report.

As required by DCNPP-IDVPP-PP-05 and RFR-002, i ndividuals assigned by this organization to the IDVP have completed an acceptable Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest.

Ve ruly yo .

o . Reedy, P .

R. F. REEDY, INC RFR:na cc: F. Sestak l E. T. Denison l *

\ b N

[ Q J 'e -

i Cw 0' l

Roger F. Reedy, PE. -- Engineenng Consulung

7 , . ,, .

RFR, Inc. ..

Program Manager's Report October 3rd Friday Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 WORK ACCOMPLISHED 1.1 Design Chain 1.2 Reviews 1.3 Audits 1.4 Reports 2.0 SCHEDULED WORK FOR NEXT REPORTING PERIOD 2.1 Design Chain 2.2 Reviews 2.3 Audits 3.0 STATUS OF SCHEDULE 4.0 CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS PROGRAM MANAGER'S REPORT 5.0 MEETINGS 4

6.0 CONCLUSION

S A

Roger F. Reedy. PA - Engtncertag Consutung mm

. e. 4 =4 .

rv.- ----,-.-,,-w-e-- m-g..,--rne-. -,-r,v. ---wr , ,,---w---w ,r,- e-m, - - , - - - , , e, s wp , , ~ , . --,,,-,,w, , - , - - - - - m.4- - - , - - ,, - - -,, - ,, - - . - - -

~ .-

1.0 WORK ACCOMPLISHED 1.1 Design Chain ITR completed.

Design chain interface diagrams submitted to TES.

1.2 Reviews .

g Completed 1.3 Completed.

RFR audit of DCP corrective action commenced November 11, 1982 following completion of audit checklists and TES review of checklists.

1.4 Reports 65% completed.

2.0 SCHEDULED WORK FOR NEXT REPORT PERIOD 2.1 Design Chain completed 2.2 Reviews All reviews have been completed.

2.3 Audits Audit of DCP QA Program implementation for corrective action will continue. Completion date is planned for December 3, 1982.

2.4 Reports First draft of RFR, Inc. Review and Audit Report to be _

completed.

. 3.0 STATUS OF SCHEDULE 4

RFR, Inc. Reviews and Audits are progressing as planned and no schedule delays are known or anticipated.

4.0 CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS PROGRAM MANAGER'S REPORT _

None.

Roger F. Reedy. P.E. - Engtncering Consulting m-

-*- p ww e- - - - -+,u --*---e- - + - s----&-----e-w.$+m+ g t,-reg---g -w--- g -.e.,-- -was p. w. ----ie- --r--my-egwe---w- - --e--,----a--e---w--e -

'4 5.0 MEETINGS A TES QA audit of RFR, Inc. IDVP Phase II activities was performed on October 18, 1982. On October 27, 1982, RFR, Inc. had a planning meeting with the DCP at San Francisco to obtain information needed for the RFR, Inc. audit of the DCP corrective action.

6.0 CONCLUSION

S RFR, Inc. has completed their part of the design chain and

, reviews andaudits. An audit of DCP QA program implementation is being conducted by RFR, Inc.

f

-9 1

[

Roger F. Reedy. P.E. - Engineertag Consulting ,

em

  • wa

,.-_s .--,.eg --,.,--y,,,_.-,. .

.m,- , . - - - . -a, , v---m---,-.-. - - , .

,n- , -.c----,w- - , , --,.,w-w-,n, , -gn_,,.e-,-, yam.--~,,-

l

~ 3..V' .

November 15, 1982

  • Third Friday. Report Disbursement List cc : - H. Schierling (2)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20114 R. Fray Diablo Canyon Verification Program Manager PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 215 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94106 F. Sestak, Jr.

Chief Power Engineer STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION g:

245 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02107 s R. L. Cloud R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 E. Denison .

~R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 H. H. Brown KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M. Street, N.W.

Washngton, D.C. 20036 D. F. Fleischaker P.O. Box 1178 Oklahoma City, OK 73101

, J. Reynolds CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

'. 10951 W. Pico Blvd. _

- Suite 300

- Los Angeles, CA 90064

't

, B. Norton 8 NORTON, BURKE, BERRY & FRENCH, P.C.

i- 3216 N. 3rd Street Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85012 _

t A. C. Gehr ,

. ~ .

S e- merge # es-e

  • 4 e ***

.~ , -

SNELL & WILMER ,

3100 Valley Bank Center Phoenix, AZ 95073 -

4 e

y a m 9 em o e' T h e

S 4

+

I g f i

I e

e em

?

em n m * * * * '88"* * * *

, , , . _ _ _- ,, -- - - - - - - ' - ' - - ~ ' - ' ~ ' ~

I

REGUL A TuR r ANF.ORM ATION CISTHIdVTIun 'sY S TF r4 (F103) ,

ACCESSION NOR:821201020o OdC.0 ATE: .82/11/26 NUTARIZto: r40 DOCKET a

. FACIL:50-2/5 Diaolo Canyon Nuclede Power Plant, '

Unit 1, Pacific ba 05000275 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CCOPER,w.E. Teledyne Engineering Services RECIP.NAML HECIPItNI AFFILIATI0t.

DENTON,H.R. Office of Nuclear Reactor Reculation, Director  !

EhGELKEN,R.H. Region 3, ntfice.cf Director MANEATIS,G.A. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

SLBJECT: Forwards "Indepenuent Design verification Prograe Serimonthly Status Hept for Nov 1982." l DISTRIBUTION CODE: 0013S COPIES RECEIyED:LTH ENCL S I L E : _. ,_ __

TITLE: 01ac t o Canyon 450-275) Incepencent Gesign Verification Program NCTES:J hanchett icy POR Occuments. 050002.75 RECIPIENT GOPIES RECIPIENT COPIES 10 CODE /NAFE LTTR ENCL 10 CODE /NAFE LTTR EMCL NRH LB3 BC 1 0 NHR Lo3 LA 1 1 .'

BUCKLEY,B. Oo 1 1 INTERhAL: ELD /NOS1 1 0 IE/DEF/EPLO 11 1 1 I E/ D EG A_D I R 1- 1 IE/ORP DIc 1 1 dTRh'SCHfFRLisD 1 1 NRR/0E/CEB 12 1 1 NRH/DE/EQB 13 1. 1 NRR/0E/GS 14 1 1 NRk/DE/MEB in d 2 t!RR/0E/GAH 16 1 1 NRH/DE/SEB- il 1 1 NRR/DSI/ASB 18 1 1 NRH/OSI/ICSR 1 1 NHR/OSI/PSS 1 1 REG FILE 04 1 1 RGNS 08 2, 2 RM/Ot>AMI/MIe 1 0 EXTERhAL: ACHS 19 lb 16 FEPA-REP OIV 1 1 LPOR 03 d 2 NRC PCR 02 1 1 NSIC 05 1 1 NTIS 1 1 NOTES: 1 1 TOTAL NUMdER OF CuPIES nEwu1RtC: LTTR 45 ENCL 42 t= 4 mee e 4

zjT.

"f' R.F. REEDY, INCORPORATED 236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 * (408) 354-9110 November 15, 1982 Dr. W. E. Cooper TELEDYNE ENGINEERING. SERVICES 130 Second Avenue Waltham, MA 02254 RFR, Inc., November Program Manager's Report -

- 3rd Friday Report

' Dear Dr. Cooper Enclosed please find the RFR, Inc., November Program Manager's Report.

As required by DCNPP-IDVPP-PP-05 and RFR-002, individuals

assigned by this organization to the IDVP have completed an acceptable Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Confl'icts of

~nterest.

Ve *ruly yo .

. g f o F. Reedy, P .

R. F. REEDY, INC RFR:na

  • cca F. Sestak E. T. Denison gc 1

L . I f (* _~

c~

(*, "

. k. ~

'\ ,

I Roger F. Reedy. PE - Engtacenng Consulung

- m. -

. .=

.~ '

i RFR, Inc. ..

'y l Program Manager's Report -

J October

,3rd Friday Report TABLE OF CONTENTS i

r 1.0 WORK ACCOMPLISHED 1.1 besignChain 1.2 Reviews 1.3 Audits 1.4 Reports 2.0 SCHEDULED WORK FOR NEXT REPORTING PERIOD 2.1 Design Chain -

2.2 Reviews 2.3 Audits ., \

3.0 STATUS OF SCHEDULE t 4.0 CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS PROGRAM MANAGER'S REPORT -

i.

5.0 MEETINGS + ,

i "

6.0 CONCLUSION

S ,

? .

.Y t

1 4 L f Rger F. R edy, P.E. - Engineering Consult.ing -

e 4musum .*.

Lee .mo e *

  • 4
  • eoe. . ,.,e 9

o '.* .'.. *  !

I 1.0 WORK ACCOMPLISHED 1.1 Design Chain ITR completed.

Design chain interface diagrams submitted to TES.

1.2 Reviews w -; .; .

Completed 1.3- Completed.

RFR audit of DCP corrective action commenced. November 11, 1982 following completion of audit checklists and TES review of checklists.

1.4 Reports -

65% completed.

2.0 SCHEDULED WORK FOR NEXT REPORT PERIOD -

2.1 Design Chain Completed 2.2 Reviews All reviews have been completed.

2.3 Audits Audit of DCP QA' Program implementation for corrective action will continue. Completion date i s planned for December 3, 1982.

~

2.4 Reports ,

First draft of RFR, Inc. Review and Aud/t Report to be -

completed.

3.0 STATUS OF SCHEDULE .

RFR, Inc. Reviews and Audits are progressing as planned and no schedule delays are known or anticipated.

4.0 CORRECTION TO PREVIOUS PROGRAM MANAGER'S REPORT _

None.

Roger F. Reedy P.E. - Engineering Consulting ' '

GM 6

,* ,...m., , _. _ _ _ _ . . , . . _ , _ ,, _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ , ,

__-,7 y,, __

__g,_

.l, l

l 5.0 , MEETINGS A TES QA audit of RFR, Inc. IDVP Phase II activities was performed on October 18, 1982. On October 27, 1982, RFR, Inc. had a planning meeting with the DCP at San Francisco to obtain information needed for the RFR, Inc. audit of the DCP corrective action.

6.0 CONCLUSION

S . .

RPR, Inc. has completed their part cf the design chain and reviews andaudits. An audit of DCP QA program implementation is being conducted by RFR, Inc.

I.

Roger F. Reedy, P.E. - Engtacering Consulting

. .m..

q, . . .

November 15, 1982 Third Friday Report Disbursement List cc: H. Schierling (2)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20114 R. Fray Diablo Canyon Verification Program Manager

> PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY .

215 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94106 F. Sestak, Jr.

Chief Power Engineer .

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts 02107 R. L. Cloud R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 9'4710 E. Denison R. L. CLOUD & ASSOCIATES 125 University Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 H. H. Brown KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M. Street, N.W.

Washngten, D.C. 20036 D, F. Fleischaker ~

P.O. Box 1178 Oklahoma City, OK 73101

. J. Reynolds CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST 10951 W. Pico Blvd. _

~

Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90064' .

B. Norton NORTON, BURKE, BERRY & FRENCH, P.C.

3216 N. 3rd Street Suite 300 Phoenix, AZ 85012 .

i. C. Gehr s a

m .m O

e ma . we

  • e "

6- 4__ Lt 4APO . sa .N* .

. o. .

~

SNELL & WILMER '

3100 Valley Bank Center '

Phoenix, AZ 95073 -

e a

' = $

G e

e' e 9 N == "u='k %M

  • e e

b e i F a e

e I

l i

i e

e l

l MM 9 e y . . . . . . ~ . .

. p.

0*~~ ' R E G U L A,T u R r I N F 0 H M A T I O fJ DISTHieUTION'SYSTFt* (FIDS)

ACCEOSION NnR:821201020o ovC.DATE: 82/11/26 NOTARIZto: nc DOCKET s 05000275 FACIL:50-275 Diaolo Canyon Nucleae Power Plant, Unit 1, Pacific ba AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CCOPER,h.E. Telecyne Engineering Services RECIP.NAML HECIPItNT AFFILIAT10r.

DENTON,H.R. Office of Nuclear Reactor Reculation, Director EAGELKEN,R.h. Region 3, ntfice of Director MANEATIS,G.A. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

SLBJECT: Forwards "Indepenuent Design Verification Program Serironthly Status Hept for Nov 1982."

OISTRIBUTION CODE: 0013S COPIES RECEIVEU:LTR ENCL SIZE: ..

TITLE: Diaolo Canyon (50-275) Incepenaent Gesign Verification Program NCTES:J Hanchett icy PuR Occuments. 050002.75 ,

RECIPIENT LOPIES RECIPIENT COPIES 10 CODE /NAFE LTTR ENCL 10 CODE /NAFE LTTR EMCL NRH LS3 BC 1 0 NHR Lo3 LA 1 1 .

BUCxLEY,B. Go 1 1 INTERhAL: ELu/HOS1 1 0 IE/DEP/EPLO 11 1 1 I E/ D EQ A _D i d 1- 1 IE/ORP OI4 1 1 dTQh'SCWTFRLTAC 1 1 tJ R R / DE/C E B 12 1 1 NRH/DE/EQB 13 1 1 NRR/0E/GB -

14 1 1 -

NRH/DE/MES 13 2 2 NRR/DE/ GAB 16 1 1 NRH/DE/SEB 11 1 1 NRR/OSI/ASB 18 1 1 NRH/DSI/ICSR 1 1 NHR/OSI/PS8 1- 1 REG FILE 04 1 1 RGN5 08 2, 2-RM/00AMI/MIB 1 0 EXTERhAL: ACHS 19 lb 16 FEMA-REP OIV 1 1 LPOR 03 d 2 NRC POR 02 1 1 NSIC 05 1 1 NTIS 1 1 NOTES: 1 1

~

TOTAL NUMBER OF CUPIES nEwu1RtD: CTTR 4S ' ENCL 42

_ . . . . . .. . . . .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20210P515&oldid=3309140"