ML20210A965

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Package of Miscellaneous Allegation Matl
ML20210A965
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/1985
From:
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML20197F755 List:
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8601270249
Download: ML20210A965 (74)
v • d • e


Text

.',

W~

W

=

W /VfQ.f Review of the MISCELLANEOUS Allegation Category 1.

Missing 2.

Reviewed; no coments 3.

Missing 4.

Reviewed; no comments 5.

Reviewed; one minor coment concerning the last sentence of first paragraph on page 3.

6.

Reviewed; no comments 7.

Missing

8..a) All issues appear to be addressed: however, it is difficult to follow.

I suggest rewriting this such that (a), (b), (c),

and (d) be addressed in order and that paragraphs applicable to be clearly identified.

b)

The first sentence under item 4 is not clear, c) Certain paragraphs (Second person interviewed) could be com-bined into one.

d) On page 4. maximum movement is " acceptable to A-C W, and TUGC0".

What is the acceptance criteria?

I think it should be identified? Also, is this movement acceptable to the NRC staff?

e)

Since issues (c) and (d) seemed to be addressed together in the TER, the author should consider combining them into a single issue under the Characterization Section.

9.'

Missing 0601270249 051212 PDR FOIA G AR DE85-59 PDR 10.

Reviewed; no comments F#/A - ts'-59 11.. Missing 8 9

2 12.

a)

I am not sure the discussion of the generic defects found at Shoreham are germaine to this allegation.

I am not disputing this applicability to Comanche's TDI generators, just their relevance to this allegation.

b)

It is appropriate in the conclusion to cite the recertification.

c) Consideration should be given to rewriting for clarity the first sentence on page 2.

13.

a) Reviewed this and found it difficult to understand.

I con-clude it was the best job that could be done without including drawings.

Sketches if approrpiate for a TER would facilitate understanding of these issues, b) is this the Unit 1 or 2 crane?

If for Unit 1, what about Unit 2 (I assume the crane for Unit 2 is installed)?

c) These allegations appear to be related (loosely) to Hiscel-laneous 21 (AM-25).

Would it be appropriate to combine?

d) Sources for criteria "3/8 inch design gap" on page 3 should be cited.

14 a) Reviewed with editorial coments b) " Actual inspection... by Brown and Root inspectors" is not a sentence.

Contains other typos as noted.

15.

Reviewed; no coments 16.

Reviewed; no coments 17.

a)

Issue is not well characterized.

The NRC staff has " determined

... the most appropriate issue." Characerization of issue should maybe refer to communication protocol related to the IAP.

b) Conclusion makes no direct reference to the issue of material false statements.

c) A sentence of page 2:

"!ssues directly related... the NRC technical staff" seems to indicate that material false statement issues are not within the scope of TRT activities.

If this is true, then the issue should be recharacterized as suggested in (a) above.

.A 3

18.

Reviewed; no comments 19.

Missing 20.

Reviewed; no comment 21.

a) Which unit does this allegation address?

b)

Should this be combined with Hiscellaneous No. 137 c)

Reviewed; no specific comments related to this issue.

22.

Reviewed; no comment 23.

Reviewed; no comment e

~

" ~~

7/30/84 Project Mar.ager

~

~

Staff T. A. Ippolito, f.E00 Assistant 01 Interface R. Wessman, HRR A. Vietti J. Gagliardo. IE R. C. Tang, NRR g,_

7 g71

~

BiR'812 897-2201

- 81R 812 897-2201 B&R 854 897-3166 B&R 854 897-3166 897-4873 Electrical /

Civil / Mechanical QA/QC leader Costings Leader Test Programs Leader Instrumentation Leader J. Calvo. IIRR.

l.. Shao, RES H. Livemore, R III P. Matthews, NRR R. Kefmig, R-l Leader I

I.

I I

I x3216 i_______._.______8 t_-___-

NRR C. Hale

- R IV C. Johnson - R IV A. Mackley - INEL A. Johnscri-R IV S. Hou NRR V. Matson - INEL S. Kirslis - NRR D. Beam

- INEL U. Marini - RTS D.'Jeng G. Cycrs Parameter R. Hubbard - Sandstone T. Curry

- INEL J. Taylor

- BNL W. Smith

- R IV Parameter D. Sumners - INEL V. Lettieri - BNL J. Solan - LLNL J. Devers R. Unite - LLNL C. Hofmayer-INEL

  • M. Bullock - INEL W. Wells

- BNL INEL

  • C. Morton - LLNL P. Chen E. Tho=pson-ETEC M. Elf

- LLNL C. Richards-ETEC L. Jackson - R !!

R. Masterson-Parameter W. Liu

- R II Site Phones V. Ferrarint-Parameter J. Harrison-R III Commercial : (817) 897-3167, 3166, 2201 J. Melanson-Teledyne F. Farmer - INEL T. Langowski-ETEC H. Rockhold-INEL Brown & Root (817) 897-4881, ext. 871, 854 and 812 R. ?hilleo - Parameter R. Hedderick ttNL

  • D. Landers - Parameter R IV NRC Resident:

(817) 897-2201

  • J. Tapia Region IV R. Bangart
8. Cloward, EG1G B. Payne, EG1G Fo/ A 59 J. Corbet. EC1G
  • Part ti=e P. Snyder EG1G

.._ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _,,,,, a,,,,,,. %,,;,.,, 7,,o.,

~

Project Manag2r l

~

T. A. Ippolito AE00 Staff Assistant O! Interface ti h.

J. Gagliardo 1E R. Wessman,ilRR R. C. Tang, NRR 897-3167

,x871 K. Crown 1

1 I

l B&R 812 897-2201 B&R 812 897-2201 B&R 854 897-3166 B&R 854 897-3166 x3216 897-4783

- Electrical /

Civil / Mechanical QA/QC Leader Coatings Leader Test Programs Instrumentation Leader Leader i

Leader

  • J. Calvo, imR L. Shao, RES H. Livermore, R III P. Matthews, NRR
  • R. Kelmig, R-I l

l I

l t-.----

n.----

.s

  • A. Johnson - RIV D._ Jeng

- NRR C. Hale RIV C. Johnson - RIV

  • W. Smith - RIV eR. t!hite

- LLNL

5. Hou

- NRR V. Watson - INEL S. Kirslis - NRR l

C. Hofmayer-INEL T. Curry INEL V. Lettieri - BNL l

R. Hubbard - Sandstone D. Sumners-INEL W. Wells

- BNL I

R. Masterson Parareter M. Bullock-INEL P. Chen

- ETEC C. Norton - LLNL j

l C. Richar'ds-ETEC M. Eli LLNL l

Secretaries E. Thor::pson-ETEC L. Jackson-RI!

Site Phones i

Y. Terry T. Langowski ETEC W. Liu

- RII Commercial:

(817) 897-3167, 3166, 2201 l

  • T. Sredice V. Ferrarint Parareter H. Rockhold INEL l
  • P. Bjerke
  • R. Philleo - Parameter R. Hedderick LLNL Brown and Root:

(817) 897-4881, ext. 871

!

  • n. O'Brien J. Tapia

- RIV S. Strait - LLNL 854, and 812 RIV Secy D. Hansen - INEL J. Schapker RIII J. Melanson-Teledyne V. Nenzel -

INEL NRC Resident:

(817)897-2201(Construction)

D. Landers - Parameter (817) 897-4873 (Operations)

J. Devers Parameter Region IV R. Bangart M75kow

~ ~ IC ' Harbroh "

D. Hunnicutt B. Cloward, EG&G L. Jones J. Cunnins B. Payne, EG&G G. Thomas l

S. Phillips F. Warren L. Rounds l

D. XcIley R. Bonnenberg part tire C. Oberg R. Turner 70/ A-25-51 l

8/n i

-.Fourtde'slion - September. _ -. _15-21,"1984.

' ' ~ '

8/30/84 e

Project Manager T. A. Ippolito AE00 staff

  • Assistant 01 Interface N

A. Vietti J. Gagliardo, IE R. Wessman, HRR

' W. 011u 897-3167 x871 R. C. Tang, NRR K. Brown l

i

' B&R 812 897-2201 B&R 812 897-2201 B&R.854 897-3166 B&R 854 B97-3166 x3216 897-4783

.. Electrical /

Civil /Hechanical QA/QC Leader Coatings Leader Test Programs Instrumentation Leader Leader I

i

~. Leader l

  • J. Calvo, !!RR L. Shao, RES H. Livennore, RIII P. Matthews, NRR
  • R. Kelmig, R-!

l l

I i

i t.____________

RIy C. Johnson RIV

  • W. Smith - RIV
  • A. Johnson - RIV D. Jeng

- NRR C. Hale S. Hou

- NRR V. NatTon INEL S. Kirslis NRR INEL

  • V. Lettieri - BNL
  • C Hofmayer - INEL T. Curry R. Hubbard - Sandstone D. Sumners j INEL
  • W Well5

. BNL Secretaries R. Masterson-Parameter C. Morton - LLNL

  • K.

Baumann P. Chen

- ETEC M. Eli

- LLNL

  • P. Bjerke C. Richards - ETEC L. Jackson - RII Site Phones RIV Secy E. Thompson - ETEC W. Liu

- RI!

Commercial:

(817) 897-3167, 3166, 2201

~*K.

Toms

  • T. Langowski-ETEC R. VanderFeek INEL V. Ferrarint-Parameter P. Chan

- LLNL Brown and Root:

(817) 897-4881, ext. 871

  • R. Philleo - Parameter C. Haughney-Parameter 854, and 812
  • J. Tapia

- RIV D. Schultz - Parameter D. Hansen

- INEL T. Workinger Parameter NRC Resident:

(817)897-2201(Construction)

+

J. Melanson - Teledyne R. Bonnenbero INEL (817) 897-4873 (Operations)

  • D. Landers - Parameter R. Harbron -' INEL.

REGION IV J. Devers

- Parameter H. Mang INEL B. Evans

- INEL R. Bangart M. Skow D. Hunnicutt F. Warren, EG&G J'.

Cummins J. Corbett, EG&G S. Phillips S. Bruske, EG&G D. Kelley L. Jones, EG8G FosA-SS-59

  • part time C. Oberg 6

4

Fi f th 5:ssion - October 1 s.n.,1984 9/21/84 s u., i um. n u. u.

.u.

12,

?

l Project Manager j

, Editors T. A. Ippolito, AEOD Staff W. 011u Assistant R. Hessman, NCR K. Brown J. Gagliardo, IE R. C. Tang, NCR i

897-3167 x871 A. Vietti, NRR l

t 1

B&R 812 897-2201 B &R 812 897-2201 B&R 854 897-3166

  • B&R 854 897-3166 x3216 897-4783 j:

1 I

Electrical /

Civil / Mechanical QA/QC leader Coatings Leader Test Programs l

Instrumentation Leader Leader i

' Leader

  • J. Calvo,!!RR I., Shao, RES H. Livermore, RIII P. Matthews, NRR
  • R. Keimig, R-I f

I l

u___.____.___1_.______.,

i
  • A Johnion - RIV Onsite J. Devers (1st week)

C. Hale RIV

  • W. Smith RIV R. Hubbard (1st week)

V. Hatson INEL

D. Jeng NRR D. Sumners INEL

  • B. Hodgson BNL Secretaries S. Hou NRR C. Morton LLNL I

ADM Secy C. Hofmayer INEL M. Eli LLNL Site Phones

~RIV Secy R. Philleo Parameter

  • H. Liu RII Comercial:

(817)897-3167,3166,2201 IE Secy T. Langowski ETEC R. Vanderbeek INEL R. Masterson Parameter P. Chan LLNL Brown & Root:.(817) 897-4881, ext. 871 V. Ferrarini Parameter C. Haughney Parameter 854, and 812 P. Chen ETEC T. Workinger Parameter s

D. Hansen INEL R. Bonnenberg INEL-NRC Resident:

(817) 897-2201 (Construction)

E. Thompson ETEC R. Harbron INEL (817) 897-4873 (Operations)

  • C. Richards ETEC H. Mang INEL t
  • D. Landers Parameter

-0. E = =

HIR-Region IV r

J. Devers (2nd week)

V. Wenczel INEL R. Bangart D. Kelley I

R. Hubbard (2nd week)

M. Bullock INEL D. Hunnicutt C. Oberg J. Cumins M. Skow (J. Hedderick LLNL Corbe S. Phillips F. Warren, EG8G J._ Jones _tt, EG&G L.'

EG&G

+

Fei A M-M

  • part time J. Melanson, Teledyne b

13

=

$o

~.

a p

)

u~

kN 4

0 N %

%y w

o 0

.t>

s

% x5

'e t, w%

y Q**

w

'a t

i l

V%

b N

Un T+

v,i 4 ~-

s x

go r

tt

r-O f

5 k,

S u

k 7

T b'

s a

3 4

w w

N m

w w

w q

y y

y w

w u

Y E

s t

N g

Q t

m%

k O

"y 7,

M Y

7 y

e s

w I

b u

h k

T Q

y i

V h

T k

Y I

'u v

2 w; W 7

h I

w

v. '.

wh r

2

~

t N-7 w

s

(

7o 4,..

N

~

A 4

W q

s R

Y v'

to L w e

N t w

D

,D Ml

  • D M

,7, v, G%

N N

7' u

T i

y w, k T.3 w

r w.

o s 4 s

N W

4 '

wi T

t-T ta Nl' r

g.-

w Y

N.

\\ b TJ

{'

t ti Y

q a4

?%

T 4

A s

{t-4 w g w-i

~

i %3 k C; 9 d*, 5

(

45 - k kY l4 i

I a

j l

6 i

i l

t i

l e

i f

a s

I N

o

  • R k

Q Q

i M

h t

y i

wb I

5..'

e D

9 O

+

1 14 q

C>

fa Q,

7 4

3 d

N I

I I

1 l

s I

f a

i i

l i

y N

h N

N 5

N 5

N N

i L

U

-i a,

I O

eq n

q s

l T.

?s 'c.

4 E

7 4

't.

o 3 N

U M

h5 3,U I

o 3

a-u x

'e

, u M

O d

D

'd b'

N n:

e

')

u V

.d 4I y!

l Q

37 Q

w x<~~

.tU q %

g 4

,~

~

~

x

(

U

)4 W

3 Q

L. i x

U.

t v

w W

w l-7; u

\\t M

ql

'6 g

't w 1 y

-(

M Ol g

}

k _N h

T N

T 4.

4

=u

%i eg u-a, s-e v x a

e q;

=

~

x.

4 x s

4 o

\\

4 v

M i

e

  • s *,

u y Q %

4 CI ki

'w 5

4 i A t k g

7 %

y, 9

,(-

Y y

ra N

.j 7i

\\

V N

O.

3

{R q, Y, tjT; 24 e'4 C' QU QS u

4 l

T 1

I i

1

+

l l

i i

t i

i I

3 eg eg g

p/p g

N N

N 3

l i

i j

e

COMANCHE PEAK Allcgations R7 solution Sch:dule a

f April May June July August September October i

i i

l l

I i

l l

I I

I i

i i

l l

I I

I l

1.

Plan Approval X

2.

Personnel X----

--X Arrangement

.3.

Obtain Logistic X------- ---X Support 4.'

Develop Review X------------ ---X Packages S.

Task Force x

' Briefing &

Assignments 6.

First Site X------X Review Period 7.

Second Site X

---X Review Period 8.

Third Site X------- (

Review Period 9.

Prepare Final

(........X Draft SSER

10. Management X----X Review 11.

Final Report X----- (

12.

Submit Report to ASLB

(

,a

'o m -

' /[/(

~

f

/

Y kh J

td

/

MtSCELLANE005 f?N(

SUMMARY

Scope of Allegations:

The allegations with a miscellaneous designation covered a wide variety of topics and involved both administrative and construction activities, some safety-related and some nonsafety-related.

In total 25 allegations were designated as miscellaneous; i.e.,

their subject matter did not fall within the scope of responsibility of one of the Technical Review Team's technical disciplines. The 25 allegations were subsequently consolidated into 21 categories, each of which dealt with a general allegation topic. For a description of the allegation topics see Allegations AM-2; AM-3, AM-23(b); AM-4; AM-5; AM-6; AM-7; AM-8, 9, 10; AM-12, AM-13; AM-14, AM-15,16; AM-17; AM-18; AM-19; AM-20; AM-21; AM-22; AM-23(a); AM-24; AM-25; AM-30.

Miscellaneous

'P"I The members of the Miscellaneous Tamm were assembled based on their technical expertise, capabilities, and experience in engineering design, quality assurance and document control, inspection, construction, and regulatory activities. The team included five members from NRC's Region IV of fice with expertise in various technical disciplines and three consultants. Collectively, the team possessed experience well in excess of 50 years in the nuclear power industry and its regulation.

Findings of Miscellaneous issues:

Of the 21 niscellaneous category allegation groupinqs, 2 ware identified as having closely related issues with potential safety significance.

Texas Utilities Electric Company was requested by letter dated November 29, 1984, to provide more information to the NRC staf f before these issues can be resolved.

The first issue having potential safety significance addressed the gap between the reactor pressure vessel insulation and the biological shield wall.

As a result of its review, the team concluded that certain procedural reviews / revisions were necessary and that analyses or testing to verify adequate annulus cooling flow should be conducted.

In addition, the applicant was roquested to initiate a program which would minimite the accumulation of debris in plant areas having critical spacings between components and/or structures.

The applicant was requested to provide information which documents that these actions worn com-pleted or documents that the applicant is committed to complete them (see Allegations AM-3, 23(b)).

The second issue having potential safety significance involves the polar crane rail support system.

The team concluded that a qoneral inspection of the polar crane rail and rail support system should be conducted and that an evaluation of bearing surface gaps and rail movement should be performed.

The applicant was requested to complete these actions.

Fo/A-M-U 6h

. For the remaining 19 miscellaneous allegation categories, no actions on the part of applicant were required as a result of the team's review.

In general, these allegations were dispositioned without requiring further action because they were either unfounded, involved nnnsafety-related issues, or because the identified deficiency had been identified by the applicant's quality assurance / quality control program and corrective actions had been completed.

(

Lo In conclusion, the Miscellaneous 5eam finds that TUEC will have to complete actions and address issues associated with 1) the gap between the reactor pressure vessel reflective insulation and the biological shield wall and

2) the polar crane rail support system. Once these actLops are ccmpleted byTUECandreviewedbytheNRC,theMiscellaneousfeedbtNevesthatno outstanding miscellaneous allegation issues which would preclude licensing of CPSES, Unit 1 exist.

-wa

,f,

' &rd J.

7 I

26 mo e.

I got him upset some other time when Lfound

')

2 mir ara r

in.a PSAR ant wrote a thing on it

.a.

n 3

( At this point. in ene proceeding

}

again goes to his files and removes a docn na sM 4

5 nt.)

job.to worry ~about that shitBe told me, be said.ic. was 6

j he just was there to build 7

it.

Sometimes with.tnat setup they had there it

(

3 8

of hard to tell exac.:

was kind' tise.

tly<who worked for who at any given f

9 10 MR. HERR:.We will try to-identify this 11 see who he worked for, but how did ne thre name to lI aten you? I mean 12

,b wnat did he say to you that caused you to b 13

. e-intimidated?

We had a big argument 14 3

MR. BhRR:

sk All.right I.nnderstand you b d an 5

argument vs.th him, but dizL be say be was goin 4

16 g to beat you up?^

17 No. People don't say that. to ma la more.nnan once.'

19 MR. GRIFFIN:

i Did this guy threaten to fire to you?

21 saic that own area at wnat we saould stay in our

=

we are taking care of and not 3

all other sorts of things happening.

get into That is an unrelated 24

subject, but I found a mistake in the'PSAR and just 3

thougnt I would cring it us to their attention if it 3

was a t

i, TAYLOE A ss2s s snur.n.SSOCIATES l

w.. sum soos I

f wAswrwctow. o.c 2oco.

f0fA N~f

\\

I (202) 293 2s50

} ;if

27

~<

I mistake in their calculations.

He said I am not going to 2

do a goddamn thing about that.

I ain't worried about it.

3 To me leaving a power of ten off of an engineering 4

calculation can make tne bridge fall down or get you an 3

"F" on a test.

I didn't know if it was pertinent or not, 6

but it was a mistake.

7

- (The above referred-te 00

-~;- @

a removed from his files follows:)

9 1

10 U

1"

~

13

~

t.

34 3

16 17 18 19 3

U

(

aa 3

l 24 75 TAYLOE A550 GATE 5 1423 3 JTRIIT. M.W.- SmTI 1004 l

WA3MeeGTON. DE 20006 l-(202) 293-3950 l

l~

l

.c.

t-

..4 i

ggp

. Brown & Root,Inc.

P.O. SOX 1001 GLEN R

. TEXAS 78043 4{

,i.ig I

N J d ' v' 4.

". - A g's, j

. 'I l

. I.'k

' ' i. h 5

)

,. =

1 g

DAT8 ' --

Bo6 ftdt/te12

~

g b

i

  • s on,,
2. 7 DEc 19 77

... h t 8y l

.__._ kg..? - $ \\

l h.a$

..Vm VTE PSAtt-Ic 1.. lL._tge A-t2..

e m

e.y{hy C - (1wai4 muL&.Snuy). pal.LL 02.

b., L ?

LOA:-)2.

57A TVS fn.Af._DGM4M..Ml%/p6_.

E,.

e-

$?N

.W1*- 2000 bd. '/RL4GLff.?.'llo fi5. eEb.-.

8e

}

l A e. 6WEny_ 0F 10, A 2Xto E E..kBL

.. -. ; - -- - --5--

SMWTil<..Noldlip*' /5. !2G.Wull Ent3*'E+T

"'^ 4,---

\\

1$ 141.S9M6,.fRP: Ft6dM ALE-.It%MlZ.-- KG Q.tu.--(LXvXfleb.188mo 'w-fic = 17,82eu? .,c---- s I -- ' - - - - ~ = ~ = - QU h$$ i .w -o OST ACM ANO FeLE FS A FOLLOW WF s... =

I t ~~ 'R. HERR: This is a Brown and Root yellow 1 message and r ply form. ~ ' Yes. 3 4 MR. GRIFFIN: So you found this particular 5 problem anc brought it to tneir attention? p I was just reaciing thbAR. and I 6 . got.to..that. part.. ann.I sawettiat there was something 7 e missing off af this. I saw.it was =issing.. so I _tnid. the ~ 9 othe guy in my office, I saic ney, they = ace a mistaxe He said, yes, sure l10 here,or they left something out. I said well, wnat should we do aoout it? Be saic, 4 Il enough. well, write r thing up to._Bab Murray and.they will_ include 12 .it.in.the. ESAR and. change.it. or. look into it or whatever. 13 So I wrote tne thing. I think tnis was the first one I 14 E- - ever wrcte. .So.I wrmte ine..tning.up.and.it want nur nad he 16 I-just came unglued that we was just supposec to be t l That was one of tneir favorite 18 engineering the system. ceme-:::acks to me and this Utter guy in my of fice, that we 19 If the supposed to re-engineer the system. to , are not arenitect/ engineer decides to maxe a square circle,,that t1 = '. is the way they are going to do it and stick to the 2 procacures. 'nell.,. to me 1 think a p*mn is.ontigated Li 2s you see something that is getting ready to go together 5 4 'TAYLOE ASSOCIATES 'l. 1625 i snrer, aw. - sum too4 wA3HpftmM. D4 '.23006 (202) 293 3950 ..I .g e

-c s T - ir ra -w ,+. 73-a)/ ust cm.r : .,.3 2 1888 gpp g + things that were not by procedare at the plant. He wanted to know if I ha ,s ' e ever pluggad any base plate holes or done any illegal welding out there. I told him yes. He asked me if there was anything that I did that mignt cause serious damage to the plant or the people arounc it. I toic him nc. I felt that I didn't know that much about the stress of welds, that I'm a welder, not an engineer. I felt that I wasr.'t really cualified to say v*.etner it would damage the health and safety of the plant or the people. He asked me about whether or not rod cans were plugged in like they should be. I told him that I had seEn negligence and im;) roper rod centrol, and tha_t I had seen them unplucced long r than they are supposed it be. He asked me about whether or not I kner: anything abaut illegal plug welds in base plates. I told him that I did know about a hole being crilled in the ~ wrong place and their having to fill it in and redo it, using illegal welc filler f material and without 0: being infonned, and then making the hole again in the sa,e I told him about other instances in the north cable spreac room (Unit 72), rea. the'79E yard tunnel of Safeguards fl. In the Sa feguard #1 yard tunnel thert was 3 inproperly installed tube steel. The angles of the tube steel werc cut wron; which by procedure would have left too much gap between the tube steel and the base plate. He asked me about non-Q material being used for Q material on pipe hangers Q and supports. I told him that each crew had their own symbols and they were able D E to stamp whatever numbers they wanted to on the material. D Af ter 1 talked to the NRC investigator, ry@,6 (not sure of spelling), andh my imediate foreman, began treating me differently from what they had before. For instance, M made a C comment later to the foreman of a group I had been loaned out to that same day u b

ey:n J we s 1., w u r, < i e T!a rJ u = l~ u s n chr ao 6u (Tco j r s x m -, o co 5 d d, d. CA ckwM Qk% n, I w.7 e an . g a t W elk J k s +, a, ;% i &~W, u m Cl e ~ wL L waccephhk .i. e 2 rr */ vos ~ C.:0 ~ ? w,h a v'{k diw a. &, t'G ex~~ <.L y p,s..,~4r< J A M % 6eiwn L,renn ve d (O) < h s a M a s yp,+ g/%%=f M sud-f J w J 0; ole y e J sk.c'(cl m il. L deba., w(S %d ha - -et kc 4,i p Q [% r I < t a s,f aAi4 r e v14e L KC$ x 7' *a,4 (c std) 9y - ser y sf >O /f % n o m s h J ts % MJ wE no d:,63 / b caHu, huies m m s.1 9 ! f i 'e 2 y % y ~ s ~ wu < o (v- -(L na U lu <} >v wevu) +t

w. g u,,

p yD og a) < s o Y G t Cwe defc& & R (N bY t~D

h. s (oy & s 4*a ( s(?f/h "J s'b << IcA ws< /c

^/ a a dr,u eh a een dn u l < lh As czAm /H ?.7. 7. / - Ta <- 3 asa s S< & s N m \\ O c !s k 19', r f 7 1 - / -(, ,/* / [ FC A-85-5g ale ,e.

A. i.

. at a..

. ' ;y a.~..k C' N ?. f, /. C ~u '-. ' E :Ur FG,L.E' w. ~ en.n m w az. = ~ op a s.~ n o, m. m A:0 ess='t).u ii w s L,) FCUS TBXV/-/6 609,106 /l,106/C, 6 k u A /y s b a:>u a .&.spkT-ej zu,ee-c;%.a;.~ hi :(,,C.ata w. 9::a:: L-w.aiw.&cwf,,48'.. f T() 6 (- O _ & : $.- ')N6t h k & l. ., & I A _ Y 'li;nuj ".:,c,.v.j' T. 'C-&.O.Ll L/4C &.}.>f ' r.u:-E >&.Jg :<q - c; n..Abth ; F%' E vil M, :k-l1,4 ".ld.u'.p nS. ::.x d .e,tt.v:c"t 'J % a ,o,V M 682l'c[.s vn 'W:,.n p i ' a. ' t' - ) 43 W ,.9 ,< [v v :. & ')k.kiiro L'./.m li's, h,,L.>,). re / o k% x.d44 %<>:ya h (O k f ,,?.w.4'/,J kmx/ t <c-n& bO>'80 ak $Yi .s.:- 7.E tC,w d / r . - -!/.i s .+ < r.e r...>.s, Dp. .1. :.: :i; A .:.p~ a o -r m

  • [.

IJ /,,, a ,)' A '. Wh t *. '. ' ) $t'y,;; :,. **i g I -( pj / 5 b d m & i m w n !N m c$ $ 5{:.+ n.2v &.L wi A W 5.' h~ W(p.[ & -m.a:S.w:%wtvi.Au n a y[ e.E ~&.. dc 8-f.$t NfY i i / f S S c:.,+ u.Q Ct k eIb.d 4l h I l.<t s LY.= 0 $ t: x-ma w-cirs=wsqd{P~=t/S~$6&' :d5~'. 4%,, ..:ent< Wlsj k u a..~jf<f.N T4 * ' :IIbb b/ ~'f .).a/ '. bM' oj'$.b..: as /^ ei!& ~.<.. n..(.' n.-(. u.uiAs a J h &d& n i ilS{&asfeL x+ 4 -m+ a: . :,,b dce.E MP.C. 7. I - CLu C:.bf iO.1 c e.' Airw) w t:Ta L b-+.- ] & - 3 .l.-t:{ FCd'5 T&X/-l --M.24, J O &ll, h /0 & l'2.- 1 ~

e .r

p. ~ A (.W' p4 (F

b 's, SSER 94, 6 1. Allegation Group: g u tc. cue.o q, 4'Ar m ; 2. A11ecation number: Q.A 3. Characterization: h-ss A\\hud me-ene oc rs-6 D+Y,6' ds:0.S te > U N-6 'D AMM-Ob Ill t / f.' j 19 C ?, a 4. Assessment of safety significance: --s.E Iq\\iec <.so e ~.5 * E O* NE. q e c, $,4 is r-P

, t W i-S t-L Dl%E M"

W e D (bLQ's ) PC:C. - A8D'"4 gor e @m (_w mrE. EG emn p ra sa;-ano ac= Trix "a;' me eue N lt ' ' 'If. 4't 2 ht=i=1) D ' M D E'* ~ WEtL ~ / oI u>b.

  • ch cu. @

~ w2..g.e a:~ ~g.- e.me w,e.o=.eu:-x,+ uc n r m .f*O'J . I' Y 'l*L L $$ $W/$$ SW f 4-fYC A t'l $'S / N \\ t '-JV o rr f.i aT IMy r.Gr_- J.oC <TIVE. ANO #C Uy *-~ Q - A--.-r,n e -g m, He;,n Fsu n. -. -- e,, .w dh k, s ~c , yA ##" F *f3* "'"'2-5 l clwa 7 A14'hi~- 'fM E-D' M' L ^M A' h Ju 'f' l' "" YG Mf 9 I C)otF4 y;.' a t. % p.L. .s.- n -s o.ese._s..m p& & d e &,**! !Hicterme arc ge.4-.yk '! Y, r ~ ~,- au n w [f e:rs.+,n-t.h\\f J o b } c e.'{ wtu, M m e uco ou A> eko wT fFgw r.s L 01.A.t.d. \\~x E l e $-(Q. L p[ n:S ciWA-a 6llV.MtEl'1 d IWM m ' '"' ' 2 ubdr[Ndit;,,-3 t d' Mpd 4 Q 8 4ucF* D E c e,M.P rc-EeI p-cNw .m. p. q,c,.ce, A,vn-tr W (nie s, spesegs) mz. om;rm $w.% we wo %s d ~ is w.: Lv, ?a<o?ecDr1oa u rn.s-k a -D g; ;: c w,a & " 4 . ;a M% %o '~ J k & M 1m dd!<,, y ~FG.d. W?*5,g &-em': n sar,u.,,n.e.: y u'f 9 - m,qe w e m e,,g y LAJ k'o*CC C vPe'.J. ':..' c io N ert h, 2x:,re a,a :p [c ,,,,,7,,_ g, ,,,qg,7, 7,g & or. v EE c.s.,'- c,

- ~,. w wrn rw6).

e: t v ~ x Sog. :..r.s a fm / s-doca. &,pw. $ l. k tt $ s, M / 2 R &.*soQh?';lflc^,'< M %c'I AMD -- x wi,nsa n, x.c, =, e iso & %s'NS*""' Y I e.:.m [n u" S o b s+% insKs a m ee-k u.. ---a. i.,tr s ,g,,,A. -q MO ~ene okJ Givu c>ns w 0 %,a opcip.o, q .9,g u. t., ! -. r-5 s c x ?

c. e,. g, _ A %.... %.

p~g~ " -m+. we wdga~ uo 1x,y n,g !Y , %. A 'W pde* ecLe e -m. pix po ,, v.n., dm w.-2-. < MW .B>ll2.1 +. =%

_m 2 a _~ 4-4 s_. E ,.. ~. O A f 9 S O 0D UN' AC{ W hf &M& T Q f M J e "O Y$b"IN4 M $5 WIW NOC-LU% A $7Wd4~~u y 4,o. m iEJ$ @, Q $g$. uy _q(& gg7pjg, 4 t W fggr g g,, w,, 4 ; I UFATS hb k I, ,, A H.ku.

w. (<.,t. e_.A.

+A ewsresc A \\ 's O 9 h -s ,-----.#w--- ,r,,, y,m .3 a

we-**$M-

l).'

){ t ] f) '.

SEER WRITEUP DOCUMENT CONTROL /R0'JTE SHEET [g& G 044 I 2 M s S C GL l* Y M O h Allegation Numbers .$ M /d Subject of Allegation Mst 4,.;av.eA r e_ F., T TRT Group Author: % ~P..if>rt This sheet will be initialed by each reviewer. It stays with all revisions to the SSER writeup and serves as a routing and review record. It will be filed in the work package when the writeup is published. Draft Number Draft 1 2 3 4 I 5 Author e D2 Nf3

  1. 5 Group Leader BLwpi7M

/sf/ ffff Tech. Editor Wes sma n/Vietti J. Gacliardo T. Ippolito Revision humber Final 1 2 3 4 5 Author Tech. Editor Grouc Leader J. Gaoliardo i T. Iopolito l Administrative Writeup integrated into SSER j Potential Violations to Region IV , d<e u uff G Workpackage File Complete Workpackage Returned to Group Leader g.f/M-////h P, g r. f t' r. / L-- ?I ci-. ,... / !/,/.~ +,.. F0lA-85-59 as

/ - s ' /, e e s-L' ^ ,// s' - // ?- ./ L-n,. ~ ' /. w _7 s / Dpz e.d.rt $ k' s,b n s e,. , L_ rq

2. 5

- / /.. M ','/..' /- - /-, /- ,/ /,. e / / /r l' '.'.' ~ t . ~ i z ,/ ---.~ n .,L

t. - : :

- 1 7 .-) Q ~. .,f !.e. e. c,. /)./3 '/ % ;Nj-f ..L / -M< ? - ,e s' e W y ,f_,g fl y / *f t. $ (,, g ,/ / / a /'/ x.- - / _s /.. ~ l /. ,,/,, 7, /* ./ .,/ s.- / <' ~ m r, a' s p-e M

ma2 g Ama--A --_->A ,-_,aa ,,.h,,.a4,._-,,,,.--_,A _,,,._,&.n-,.+-,n, p.A, ./,~ t 8 mM-a O 9 L <* /- .s es-4 /.' / e e

  • * * * " f

'f< e kpfn. ? . -.,/*. ./, d s-a .{ fa ' gA ,e c' rl ,,.s p y a o / w I M b + W f 9* a f /C 'e'.' r* ~. W.s .I - Y_. o

s' 6

<w. s ,a ..? ,a / o.. au.* gp. e. ~r _ m y, - &, w / f \\i A w s M-O') /1'... c's ~., ,p '/ -' . r p.

  • f

~ a-t l / e f' ?&J ' ** A ,o p** s**, ,. "- Jo' e- ,M ~ '.~ h,. sc'.M,,. C f. ic l-I i Y ' l { ,,f

  • k E&
  • AW f

[ p f / rL a Y, i s I // ^ ~ c. \\ "g/.' - o' ,/7.l'.s e e. c e e ) a , yY f ff* v t / nu/ sg... ~ 1. ae,- f j W al A L d h-M' 5' N AJ / O 4 s t.. e *,,,,,,, / *' e' [<./ 'h ,/ [. C (5" ' p e .,_ r r,. ra. -..,,-.m

/ fl... l* l p _,.- pr /* .s /- / a o / f,- y T ' *.f f : " ' ' s ,o k- .7 / ,~, .t. ,/m ^ /, . a -: /. o _e.,. /.. j - <.,.- . T., ,/' ~ &. - J f h *9 e ~ .a &. J s e. \\ b b e /' /- 2 J/._. Y0/f.c G.o c..<<.<-( Q l[t-e,.- jf. *~~, /-. '/ h e', /, $ W /* w ./ C / d m f'A ~,Wc4 /, f /- s g 7 e L e'. / f. sa, _s or ( 88P1 a e "W f ofG W4:mA V t v, /g/1,;/! / y. n.c -' g r a / v .l y 1/ :.' A f <.- e.- , / / ?<- -e,- ~ rgv.c 18 Q. ,,e /r/f-v'

  • .',._i,,,.

/ ./ O . u;.

,) ; ~ 1 L..

  • xv.

kWhN in M ,,; ~ - n -c. =.<. it l c' ~ 4t, ,-c 6.' *.T'. rs :s ~~~. ^,. ** ~- a ' ' ' f- % s dad -teet4 44 West #41b f

  1. 'be " '

.j 7,'/4f-x- 3. ) s u. /. ) a i f /ne ( y ~ /.- si ar c ? ,0 re. r u_, ' / w )

  1. ,/ -

i .. /.' e /,. .pt -s.. w pt" g i / st' N-- q_c R 0 ' ~' >'Y/ t ~ J-- / a. / '. ~,, f 1 /*** s. / <.=. e s

  • \\

A.. / %,r ( Q,, /.* '# * ', '_/ J- .a. , A*' t' s. ' -.

  • a a*

p Y.

  • f'.
    • ~

f g 4.~**- r / ,/ ~ s' s l 6 /)4 ( / ,/U _f f f.s s .~ e. t 4 Sr. i s' l f ){ %0 w g 4 t' e# 0 g M g s sd ,, /

  • s

,i e w.. 0 V .) r, e .( vvmn-~w--r-vm-,sm-,g ,4,g,,..m,4 ,_.,y,,,

,,,^. ...,j. v L. 9* / .Q. '.,, /.~.. . e << : q /. b i4 44>'t g .(* } ,,1-T ~'- ~'- ^'^' / w. J d : s p o.s N e x % c .-/ I '. ._ f

fe s-

- /. // r s' s/ ~ [ - bl{ ! [f WQ.] s% f f b 5 S o N 'Y W

  1. f* ' t y

. ' q,. ,, ~ '

  • e. =,

,r-n . ~ " ^ a - 4 4.<~. ./ c: e, ri fy u&- -@l<esm;, - ~ * , (_ /A /W - e-e / -t c . d "c't. <- s ' < s - '~ %k &c'. . m z z.-z ; ~. z y. w. _ . -n -- n) 9 W w.2/ 0 ~ / 8 c~ =

. = :.. _,, a.ca a&

W c$ h mm el hsf ffc.1'k & Q,

- ?....

/- ,/' /- p, c e - n, u < .- /. . 6. e i. . z,M *. -) G.,,.,/ 7, c. - 1 = =...., e. ,- L - ' s- ,/ y g,, ./ ., / p- / s'"~ ,/ x,,ge,, u, /. _ ',, '? ' ,/ /.. _. A ' ( 0 '* / ' e - '-**/ ~ ',, /'), C /- rt i; . a.. e... g. y ?..

N' = i o w* s / ~ s < M p ~p's. " c-* w -. /.. \\ .p m'- .pp w4 ,. p s h d M [ gy,x[., a /. 7 ,p s f ',s* f=

    • f

(_ _ s* , Jt p i 1 e. / }.' / ( e s' / 7 J s - -f = s. !~ y-s = O /' - p O S / r

P / / / / T,' .,4 s s' e - ~. 'a ,/- - e. p / 9 ),/, /'/ &-// . /

2. /\\

?.r s, y '.. < - /2f ~'&'"- N. f ..s, s

  • C rs V

C . 3 Q, ,s f O M / f fs Y

  • m f

/ ,/ e g g y. Q :'.-, jf y f y.. -/,/ 7 g., .,n,. * - /Y- ./ / w- ,/ a, Je f L' k f l h ~~ .) ?O.. . /) ~ ~ 'w , )(, * Y ' lf, ~ ~ * ~ " me s F.i-m G.:2"3, E - l- - C CVIE; ~ ~~ , 3-- /./_ D - "/ 9 '^c ~ 3,, A . '/_ [,,, o/ ? ,-is. / s /,,4. ef s- < st ' "Q. / /4 4. 7, /o

  • ' /*.

tf g,* w**~~~ f d ./ ,,.</ e4.e. c I

O + u.. x e

s. ~,
7. __f a m p

, A. 4 %.t.nr 7 ava.,u ,o 0 Y ubstzt 6 h td fsyA w Ro/g pax % h d4 pc+bu XAc"a' ,I&rw )la) w As, .cd g 2 nacnqixe8rwkby =;A A a&L,uA+n a _e rW1& dum .%u-Q -me/ Ja,l s<y. 4arsf. uit 1, w s t,s-,, w h t JX L6&Jn e c-q 24 / L,,, . n ;e y,+ ~ ~ " ' ' a,wd /J C L &-ru. / /,* L. i s/ 5, <l J u A.L c cet v (A / 1- ' ' ' -i..aQ g?' /L [,f f 1 / y M _LA D f 1l_l N^b! ^f ! ' wr h }} b) n).w.;L m. a uesa-s u a s s / As >,#1 A 9 E0lA-85-59 se

.6,- aN 9a /ued'A41& au anw a A st,w. oo n cL+tm $km i& AlC A. &A4 /. dl' ;/.at eenu w of /s a % ncyauk /Wb ( Al l g$ g n~a aL; rh L v Y A s u n +-b b p s &j c i,4and p d j a,: cub /

sor, b,$g pIwoiwa.-:.<zAt}-Q,h; 9 ak 25r A f,' '

y / 9 ) 9-4e s %fW'dN<sc. 6-g{8,W 1-a 9'4 /nxr erAgf-ECb 3, 4 L A 1. p?c \\ eryst % c o n > /a ud&' q % .46w.sp 3 6,pade~ w r x di e ac zn n -os.

,g

==m M O s g. " W '"??T& 2p75;;*#C@f'f,,,, ?Ar .y y y,m -,. y g m,,u 2u w -., ...,c ; rm.m f 'M (@% ' M'G C(W,-4) f p' L ,/ n w gr vy y7g.<,.u,rae9,2 rey-t'n h}7'Z']2?:'g^977AW ;W .PP P e a <>.~.w,aryp pc:wdm / A ./- /A'r if c' T dd 9 n 7& cwa 'My ye pim p Y" % 00/ fr*- #Pf /

o( d l f g / e Document Name: AM-21 Requestor's ID: OP15 Author's Name: JKelly/sm Document Coments: SSER AM-21 F0lA-85-59 3 sse

Draft 1 9/17/84 SSER 1. Allegation Group: Miscellaneous, No. 18 2. Allegation Number: AM-21 3. Characterization: '4. Assessment of Safety Significance: The NRC staff reviewed background information pertinent to this allegation, interviewed managers, staff, and technicians affiliated with Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCO), Brown & Root, medical laboratory personnel, and law enforcement officials. The topics for the interviews were: Methodology utilized in conducting drug investigations. Related personnel actions for identified drug abusers. Techniques employed for pre-employment background investigation. Programs for employee supervisory oversight. Programs for employee assistance amoung the permanent party. Nonconformance report (NCR) described (TUGCO) security investigators from the corporate office in Dallas followed up on the allegation of onsite drug abuse by Brown & Root employees. These incidents, as alleged to TUGCO, reportedly occurred in the construction area of Unit 2 and involved personnel from a mixture of a.. m __,,_m..r,m-. , - -... _ _ _ ~,. _,, ,m.,,

- ~ _ 2-trades and fields. Through a series of, interviews beginning with the alleger, the investigators developed information about a number of drug abusers. Based upon the statements of the alleged onsite drug abusers, personnel action was taken to terminate those who were verified as abusers. The NCR was discussed by the NRC staff with TUGC0 corporate officials who supervised and conducted the investigation. They reported that they received an allegation abcat drug abuse onsite by Brown & Root employees. They interviewed the alleger to measure the veracity of the information. Based upon this information, an investigation was organized to employ the sociometric or networking method. Fifty-six person were interviewed to complete the network of 1 relationships. Thirty-nine individuals were invited to support their I statenient throught the use of the polygraph. Thirty-three people i l terminated employment after the results of the statement taking and i interviewing process was referred to the Brown & Root personnel office. TUGC0 applicants for unescorted access to the protected area and security personnel from Burns International, who are contracted to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, Appendix B, are required to provide a specimen for urine analysis which includes a wide rar. ding drug screening. ) This test is a precondition of employment with both companies. These -w- .e.-v.ww,-,-.---%,#,-me--, v..-m--yre..,. .4%,e ew.., a.r,-+ y-, %3-,,,r. -c ,w -e,,.. ,r

e---

+ gm ig-w t,

3-applicants are also subjected to an inde,pth background investigation. l i These techniques are detailed in the SAFEGUARDS edition of the physical security plan. However, these commitments, while being currently met, are not mandatory until the reactor is operational. Further, the t commitments exceed current requirements and industry standards. } On September 13, 1984, the NRC staff determined, through interview and records review, that Brown & Root had not regulatory requirement to give f a physical examination to their employees. It is the corporate policy to give a physical examinat' ion to satisfy the insurance precautions of t workmen's compensation. A urine analysis is performed by qualified lab technicians but does not include a drug screen. I An examinatoin of procedures and materials by NRC staff on September 11, i 1984, reflects that TUGC0 has began a supervisory indoctrination program concerning the recognition of drugs, alcohol, and drug abusers and I abbarent behavior. This is being done in anticipation of operations. It was determined through interview of the county sheriff by the NRC I staff on September 13, 1984, that the law enforcement authorities had been notified of the investigation. 1 5. Conclusion and Staff Position: The NRC staff determined that an NCR had been written on drug abuse reported by a worker. The allegation was verified to be true but had no safety signficance relative to the i --,w---w ,-a%w- -,--,-w-,m-,,3-,,w-wrwn,,-,m,&,-, ~-,-ym-,---cy,-- .&*--*t--ww-~--- e e - w -v - v v -t e-- wnr--'+we-*-- -'*-++'mT-rsNw---

. preparation of the plant. TUGC0 has put into place an effective program for the pre-screening, detection, and treatment of drug and alcohol abusers. The program exceeds requirements and is being practical prior to the time of cormiitment. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ~+ r

4 4 ?. 1 I ~ G p u w M e_ h a. h 1.- c I + - Ae, car ) vraft 1 g/17/34 g 55tR .j I 1. Allegation Group: Miscallaneous. No. 18 f i 2. Allegation Musber: AM.21 h 6 3. Characterization: The NRC staff reviewed backgrowed Assessment of Safety 5tonificance: 4. information pertinent to this allegation, interviewed managers, staff. f and technicians affiliated with Temas Utilities Generating Company l (TUGCO) Brown & Root medical laboratory personnel, and law enforcement officials. The topics for the interviews vers! } Methodology utilfzed in conducting drug imestigations. I Related personnel actions for identified drug abusers. Techniques employed for pre-employment background investigation, h Progras.s for esplayee supervisory oversight. the permanent party. Programs for employee assistance I Monconformance report (NCR) _ described s (TUGCO) security investigators from the corporate office in Dallas followed up on the allegation of eroite drug abuse by Brown & Root I l j These incidents, as alleged to TUGCO. reportedly occurred f a employees. the construction area of Unit 2 and involved personnel from a mixture of f I 6 e a ~ - _ _ --.-r

n._m m _a - 1- = 1 2-1 't trades and fleids. Throwgh a series of interviews beginning with the { alleger. the. investigators developed informatten about a number of drug ' **asers. Based upon the statements of the alleged onsite drug abusers. } personnel action was taken to terminate those who were verified as k abusers. i 6 The NCR was discussed by the lutC staff with TUECO corporate officials who supervised and conducted the investigation. They reported that they received an allegation about drug abuse onsite by Brown & Root t I { employees. They interviewed the alleger to measure the veracity of the I infomation. Based upon this infomation. an investigation was organized i to employ the sociametric or networking method. t Fifty-six person were interviewed to eglete the network of relationships. Thirty-nine individuals were invited to support their statement throught the use of the polygraph. Thirty-three people teminated employment after the results of the statement taking and interviewing process was referred to the Brown & Root personnel office. TUGC0 applicants for unescorted access to the protected arts and security personnel from turns International, who are contracted to meet the 8 '? requ1romants of 50 CFR 73.55. Append 1s S. are rgired ta provide a mpm$ s specimen for urine analysis which includes a wide paed4W drwg scin..N. 3 I This test is a precondition of employment with both companies. These 1 e e L t l f s ____,-,...__._m.____, z,

I i ~ _ -- lI 'appitcants,are also subjected to an indepth background investigation. These techniques are detatted in the SAFEGUAltDS edition of the pegsical ')

security plan. However, these cemitments. while being currently set.

-are not mandatory untti the reactor is operational. Further, the commitments exceed current requirements and industry standards. On September 13. 1984, the IRC staff determined, through interview and records review. that Brown & Itoot had brogulatory requirement to give a physical examination to their employees. It is the corporate policy to

give a physical examination to satisfy the insurance precautions of Ii

' wortmen's compensation. A urine analysts is performed by qualified lab f

technicians but does not incinde a drug screen, f,

h An examinah of procedures and materials by smC staff on Septemher 11 1984 reflects that TUGC0 has began a sepervisory indoctrination program concerning the recognition of drugs, alcohol, and drug abusers and abbarent behavior. This is being done in anticipation of operations. It was determined through interview of the county sheriff by the Mtc staff on September 13. 1984, that the law enforcement autherttles had been notified of the investigation.

5., Conclusion and staff position: The 15tC staff determined that an WCR had l

t been written on drug abuse reported by a worker. The allegation was vertfted to be true but had no safety signficance relative to the I I i I l e

i ) i l-t ) t I -6 3 preparation of the plant. TUGC0 has put into piece en effective program for the pre-screening. detection, and treatment of drug and alcohol .l The program exceeds requirements and is being practice $q.. abusers. tprior to I.r the time of cosmiitment. 1 i t i 7. 8. il 9. + t r 10. l r

l l

l l l S S l t 1 ( I l i t l 7 I

z/. z em 1.A'{.eaa b 6 mp: DNbms pby

s. A(9d Ns L 6 AM R

3.C_nse eszz:icu o e m N D CQ kl G. E O a h a a e e cm, # w @n L' p a b vieuael wuai b c$)A+Cetetns, $N= 0Ys-a.& tY l sn I - oecoavua h umoad h. 1 nueSa-l a.coo do9 pen = axdl l eTra _y aa en me<d % bpas O +6e_.3rd ere wen t, A a 406 cha i cadmgAmpa3k

  • Qa(

c0 p eoau acEas -Fee-IcDadked)erugaWsees ' - r1 & myuno p(e a c o pce._e 6 4 m ea a.. L ...e e .vy ey~rn cpegms. n = -= e en

  • &gesOm e-p 03eeassabcoa%%dp TN(ovtce[ecuuceuce MNcih desce th &

F0lA-85-59 ~ O <\\65'

_a ede% w c,co dedie p&m th se ah R beamget h e %u3q'? e -p a s& amg) aeuse.o3 32cetempfa s 7Ceo gcdLdE, occa tw Ccrw e u.c_.A t eA een:2 e. C& -n 1 u 7M 8(A04) W V o l t/ e 6 MM F& = vCc 3SS puth S,Y m C' e a-w eies eC mecv h mg m to?$ % a.((e Ope hue.sSm cb20pL 4G h a d am A c,P mg aouses.32sedD uga d -ed cP4&a eco W' me omsers em gt e a -as +eb z e r 2 a d o _t d e s e e m o w e e !o Ver't b i eS as afau.seE3;, % >1f2C 6 },3 C h p e d, h 5 C 3.t S S t51 E %3S eB ca0<; <Ae pucsed ava CacS ea@4q_; huesA (L UG CC l Ac A = s,d%g<ao ~g e .a z e WY bh w .) y 1 n c: a s sah nsa M% Sc~de h>e.su ce._ & -ae.cea m.a %s ahA exeo Tevac4 g s M vaas e m e w recQ-6 e H ~ -f6 e_ we dlc_ odcm weked). oc-n

agM k rWn W w gpiespp wearpA T M" p hh j o c h bb g3 j,

"# 3 fo p! ps@p te2841^p e n,ya r pv@%ghti451ja%.

8 T W du s m xa e es m mr &,1gg u M Tyj[ie g < o r p[d [l[u$ b k s' ? w [$e'! h ip fhk 4,a, pJ, g, er8s np l ocQ w1 m sn y, s ns. aan .["as. e e p tDd,,p r$ 4 d hjl 5 " '9 e +3 f 8 [p 4 'y

(5) 4 wkEvscu-% daSe&uAd W are ccc maw rea &w& q w d V a A 6.e x ~ +6 c Q<LA be x cee Rd curretd naej wtreu aad) acfL di g L,,Y) w Wgne in g ca L en subn ~w w e_ n ee_S. T(

d. s N Q J c ou p e b

g9 a e. ]a. w 4&o am%cu1L em aJ pc Lt 3 % p recedey 4c, scaCbs g-p cas h$,wh e-P woM5 pwmeOf e s. am, s ' n b. Mo S Is ' v d p C % pfod;reQL#e% % g%eMe % c.q hos i gc_ %p e c e - e m mgp e c0 el M o n e cQ b e a b e% e # pmsccew e e a Ao6C) s l u.sec s.. % rdQ p'rs. eye seek y u e =ag c a cAte.dp de e 4 h g Sho h di d. o, 4 ma er em g

y

f..

Note.s : hWh&3 . J _,, Zat' ted i:, n, f.*, A u,l't' c.-,s A a e k. S - wL a< y w -, A L h 4,3 # a,u L i J~. & e s w & a f e e'. g Lf Q4/G)C - c =x p.a a.w Do y pp w-G i d pay ~ % Fnm /~ - h 7 + / (, '! .+ ,( ~ '" V ' 1-fS y ' 7 . 3 " y y 4 il ] (o W ~ = r t c " J" e l " l Y G<i iL p 7 ~5 / /f TVL (C ~ 1s G $6 T' r' 3" W 6 '/r $ F0lA-85-59 ra4 s a a

v%2% % /m .-.4 is'r:447 /C J < *'e' ff49c/f;' JZ, Ant'//7 W, A*fs,@4'.,pf4/- fCA )lC/y/7Cg/syp",7 H//f0 /s WN/Ir /J rttI ft/Wc riow bF ritf M4? lsta./E'7 I //st tT'#ft os's 302.1 5ow p rcwcq Wst~ l*'/ M f 1.5 1*H f G G44 $/"AN5 C)f-TAY /dArl*rkf 4 0.7*7 * *,fjg /t /4? w cm.e3 w r.<r, p ner:ny ~ o. A er y*g lr'stAI' 07/?AA p ACEMAS Al#N'I' DA*'f /F /3 'AfE,' g l' 4S fd& Ss)f'E$l/108 (CoK& MM J p y f~ p-pt N fS / .~. 0 { LY f

?::

).3 /$ LlO NO L. /P'C L. 0 Ot> /W D A (/,f ff 8 tl51~,7 s*/Hof f =re r ! grW o,,n e sr a Faro.rcrees,} & *f*Wd { N G@ L I. ,,,r a f fffW o /,M M e N0lC0l- = lJf%'/j9 LbQ s Z,"Z. # dn9dA f /J 7M M ~~a m

  1. W q

M **t f o~e << o w e ' Y 0 '*b C +'I /t*'s/ s}eopadh.3 f 7.w f14+7 ? A sy $ra-m,7 A - ce*rpe y r oll /,q p'q e g \\ diApv/ - A'"f JM NJ4/.hus.:te:cy-tini',7 cv. oiger ? st-*'h< n w.),c 7 W.DM&lO Co,*7'h+* ? vaaf' nat-TNF AL)Jon] w, etwr sa u*r s.o ss eF raeaserio ry 7 - (o,,,. tru " *) rn a. mrx.s o.f rm,,4m np > W & WMq QVhNTy n Asis c . wow piscorp<t0f ocyoy g wvrtf,y r/E /*c4Lborf w6 pin.q wmr's In] ,yous nnicopisnry does e f fAcat/tri/1If '< 1 SAft77 /wrxxfs? m Muw,' ,e c x s,2 Drf # s' w)'! W h$h hW h $/ kk h h?$?lb ana4s ! 's terwert s o*- W f A B CR I2',Gro rs94/' [D *fAf/G ( WA Wit'/Af f i N 4h

WRITEUP DOCUMENT CONTROL / ROUTE S Y SSER Allegation Numbers _ 4 N-21 Subject of Allegation _h ey TRT Group _ RE G r oN , e Author: TLC m / S-4V4c h L G Cu 2RSHAw O SSER writeup and serves as a routing andThis sh I ewer. work package when the writeup is publishedreview record.It stays with It will be filed in the Draft Number Dra f t 1 I 2 I Author 3 4 1 5 Group Leader ifritaxs4w Tech. Editor Wessman/Vietti ). Gaoliardo T. Ippolito 1 Revision Number n Final I j ~~ 1 I 2 I Author 3 I 4 I 5 t Tech. Editor Group Leader J. Gaoliardo t T. Ippolito ) l 1 Administrative J Writeup integrated into SSER _ Workpackage File CompletePotential Violations to Region IV Workpackage Returned to Group Leader O

  • d F01A-85-59

,t s /16 2-

e s ph.,Ji%wUK9 y, M RE M E l M ~ e d7L f ec L/~f dh a e4D .a.aa.u - aw ,vaec..~ a }. c.mm.T fxJ g % kma L y, q / o. l hD7 -A A 0- ,---=-.-y i ,1 i_.. i >i p _ _b,,ua. de e=z.d4. : a - e c= ~ G' E ., fe'en. l* Q _! D: )# &iu)6==,Q n - _ - y g,- - 3 _ y " 3 a f 'l+ a !r eMp$ A ._.. C-QV } & ? L - l ' =c u. V W IrLilfJiiat:__... ^ d .a ThL L er susnk /sa4,; .A thiRc. soy d .x,/ \\ ibv'et m 7} ll 4 Asi& wi w 1hyd sdsIW]W K tTaoasak, s u,~kduop !n thvec . nit u p L

a. not-

... c. s */ go l acaLr Ju a//wj /ed. T r,ie t on mcc Snt 6'llyk IP'74 6 6 p,_ flo,s.V n -wr/O-sy t 2, L s a ct< 6 ff'h n i (luRc. p % J n -9 h U/2c apc% ~/r2-/s-) Pf#a - pat l w ksd a l t

~z-md?i n Gm c. CCI-- h k t) C. Su ~& N NT n Lu u t.c. %, ~J'k[ k nmu'/: NUSC ~ . s v 2 p$.L. k.On ze $.- Ce-t Ein iE l, oa E ng' *, % $ 1 il_ f f Q~ T R $ -_CC L.ls r i A sw,z:9nT_._ - )NSC-CLvN. t ~sa,;_q,.x x __ n 1-km 0$cl C GSwcL fac1 SW. G $' 6L.Ete7C n. r,n kb. 5 Ll W~ Yl-0 S &a.h MO /V, /'t F'/, fno-a. k ('l h stL m b ke C d d a m.. I,/9 78. / ..,L' i Q. y -- ,= y A

i.,

.: a gj, r W, V' a -C ' : ~,Q

, a.-++

-m- _y,. 3_ wf~ g,%Cu 1+::; x" c-- l l W_,, sJ t' 7. %, %- o i9a x; - 7. 3 7.1 l a = .x- -u s = - L-C = t. w A 7 n, l ' -L i0 I 3[w cia M ]. -W -2 ,f[y ?..yn . *,' -=3' w i,~.3 ~1M C. Q s ^ 3; le _f "a= E h,,,~eec,Ua.[sk I&yc hah s % ud (tf y Je ~ I Y C-u ?m 4% p c oan c .9 mpd ud u z i<. Tttl &CCL-L. ddk M. u.% % J u, p a-w ame f t,< y us om w.4% eh : % yc-l-hael a, sik, m c2wJ smp% 5 717 w iu e. h3%-(m[cwM LAS A c_ d cl.n o ". psJf s4k -Jud; /yo-G R., D. s u d ir c

/ n es u.orn 4. r n it. c-ye Ymv ea se._ m+_. ~ L nes n -u ' kk ew a.'e w d& m.v fif-duithwun-. w~ c g_ - y. ux.$$ w a_0 CT&Kb'/n) 2 W n o u> n, ....,;,ic d.dt c-)r!,$1R -s&,.e h_[ X w ._ L ammu ~n cW 1%n,Q_ a%- _ uf-wu cl-. .c %.e o,.v --kc.c- .aec tak ( L oc R.L e cen E f< issi4 l a a/ _.._ W_.. _ _L/T* t.'~ e.s N'7' Cu sr.sl,, C.C.L's re. i a TL<kd~a ! a c L-~s~ e / s c u ~ fa p$s G. / s4 a Ca 7 a E T u z,, dvda/)9~oc..at$t s H uec s n es J a 7Act ar ces e s. ducls nel w u so'- % kv&C ce5. a tr-t m7L-fLMr~6_? L lu)'iv'__._ o ~d, y

q... tfo C.P s

1 w itas - a./s s w .b. le s. i ,,; ca: 1si G V 1h1yL %sma/h u.Ep4( yVHc.-a s cys a-ne J/. - v l e atu e, k #~.!Wb'L I Gie r. \\ % % ~ da duca Q -Jatd ~ i' ,~.ml i e n k c, s -ud 1; y o, q _1 44 nsMe i

E 9e 8 t i ch'a&8 ,a,0crn&iw,% W V ab1 & .L o $7 ... _ /M A .~ d t -yr_nr2L > $7 i nhal f*t, [ C gL.,.___...,_. 4 &I Tk _ - _ m u R l'.h Y L. ~ L_W,;p tW_ a ,A m% ~;s;te_w; w w2L .-.._ mgu.c % Tu JLaRK %L 1 __._A w C; . /_b_2A 1 'a_mn-p < v. %% .-.______\\ yQ,hg&[A : Eh~ ~ _ W o (7 g h ts; g g m 8,mg _ ~ =J' I c. .. C L p g p l % ) I: _V 'N. G u. u i on

1. i e

_. -_.__ h4a Rgyt gessi '.s 9 L.s r 4 c m A },_ .K42 ,hf xYn a ~4 n w r s g..- s ub L uk/ sai~r.- c, The d- "5" y Wg <yt 4,

~ a e a.,Th adfa u

v.cs nc/ } ~ l i d 1 J

- T-a e b I .. _. I J A.S O 9 P h P C ( n>ca.. L 4. VD 2 l &.b~ n-wcn.4 nel p -yh n-i'~$ 't-4a T -M. / &1 a Lc-n_ u ni ~ _... _. a f ~. L P s E.s - d m...o i:</ _..s..i k.,-_b r a TL{_a L_o, Lk.//t/ _x<p 2..wt~on & < n a,aya.cL kB Lopm -4 %.~; s);L .en _ _.%~ c_L a._ 4 wo, -,gl 9 -.%g_ha au'ak d~ $ D J > L c Ps o ' e, w -. JTra r4wta; t44 1t-T ch ZLn u Q Ts Jx m y cb da~A aet n b L.'_ m d T<' /a'W a u / n.. Y k og r l_ ns, t=- _ l ' la 2 f,, 4 ' - -. n ae 46 V a h u , iLaCr*- t x 1 L. l T4 a pn i I 1 A

SSER WRITEUP DOCUMENT C'Ot: TROL / ROUTE SHEET f Allegation Numbers _ A N .2. A Subject of Allegatio< h ~. e- - ~ c-h /Y-H V4e Ah r r r TRT Group lfE d-i c v TE-1 Author: L. E Ez4 EKSNA W l This sheet will be initialed by each reviewer. It stays with all revisions to the SSER writeup and serves as a routing and review record. It will be filed in the work package when the writeup is published. Draft Number Draft 1 2 3 4 5 Author iE ELLEX Siese Group Leader Tech. Editor Wessma n/V ietti J. Gagliardo T. Ippolito i Revision Number Final 1 2 3 4 5 Author Tech. Editor Group Leader J. Gagliardo T. Ippolito Administrative l Writeup integrated into SSER Potential Violations to Region IV Workpackage File Complete j Workpackage Returned to Group Leader 1 j -.-~_r,__.c-. ~,..-,_._-,_m-- ,,.-r,, y ~_.,y,,,_,,,3.~, v c.pm...w_,,-. ,,r.,w,,,_e-m. e-,, -. -

css g OL>94A~) yeab;)> w duy~f iOJ4 1k}Q % lyk~ wL7Lpac. ~ Iab - -. 6a a ~. e w c;g n,,J..,,,, s. s a ivac r u,, e hD7-41 q I o. - O ~ clef,ak. y 1Jk-_ m m m tY =- bewm 3 5; y - f 'y rg m a u m ,w - m-1 w./, ,/- a i = ,,L..1dfu j -y <Qe -er 7y Cr b-p p .D - ~ S J TLt: d y w za a n 1, h & sej f nie. /sa b, hl)IlC. s o n & I I & tl 9 '% ~t~ 4 m) c.niu W Ibape L*bihsIdeW ) R '" K t T o.o s J da.-gulLia ap Wu /?c-s y % vs iroT c. 1

h. $l, a /~ Jg,n soOSJ

.C o JJ a//mElw u.

d. // ec An ace;dur v c,& t -

- m, 6 a &/74 Ffil+4w : Sc-~2 L Lat.L kc, r //os.?re -nc,/o-sy .r a. (~ n c. %J n -d 4 /n. f s,) fire., vec Ape % us~ c. L ded as paat

-g- )~~, N um c. 7" l Thl. (CC L. to u kr. ~ rLJa.D Ln ~.?r~E 'D$ U V C. s o, h~f L Hv<>c. s yp u o.-,d

  • I

_i,,a pavLg. s e, m h Hwes+, hm lo & n -,e of CCL'.c repnT ~ L h YDRL) w r< v r < " L iini,i Q C 'ec d n / L es,r, c'. s I nfwe t. A J //. m.s Gbuch @ach Sk E b?h, Eta 7Q' C Fa Nu. 17 ll W-7~l-b 6 cla. t ;l N c w lun / r, t? 7 /, & 95 n J<sim b c{e b d do m. /,1 9 73. /-A c, s l (- A 1 iy C'.2$ Lg,dk. w r p. v : :r a x. _..Tz c n.agx=~TQmp? 7, w,, +, = ~~ yw. ? i o 7 o_ 1 . k s M, m w! :Q I P ~"l,7 nA wysi

s 7 :&==3 Hi -

y m.w-P---] i,n <3 -u: 5g ^ a~: - xe A l, ;,,,, 3 w; C 'M.S, / !..I g v kk h he J A w ?OT IY LHay b a % s % yoeseero Ho W 6. k .AL ~J a p, h :n s w.:y i W J a 4 ;,<. y %. CC L $, AJ l Jt Tta N adJ giItx J m, k d a, sikfm m cu J%h: cx3 sypus S7ri onue. h p L d J c w M L A 'h f1 c.L c.la.o ". s4 e.Jo d; / H11wc-6 R., M e % s ir egali

-g I b ,.h. oM, c 4)" %n se aag,s, w q r jif/ a,@ % C F E es e, a. ,m m cm~7 wCL u-ac e J& n, v Hi -Jo dk.m \\ HCL / M,w.9J.sA. 07 J x.u>nd,.t-al' d h[ Ete&/n> d a .,:,b d d tc-c X } a w r4 a r c a h m N. c / a c. t ,c 7 +.c i / cw / h Tb u-4v, r u e, .c @z cah ' ku-d acclesk (Loc e) m %de% i, s,% ce m.: T i YT* v N/ Cms ab. m e.s v C.C L. 's re Wan elscu~. fab pT TL< kd~ aG.} % ~u Car 5 7 aD ILA,,.c o,, si / ,~ H v e c clo c % a., d k yJ e w 4 T) w Y l aT CP1 E c. 'T h c) 6 clo h ancl I w# ~ w.s tw c h H i3-C c a.da I oJ,p rg 16 Ch~ss.s &/ at~~t TL%/ rh luj s 1 T[a nt,a th a/A a k utsuMAD. ~ A. n /<.

s. i i,; cct 1 S, s.u L/

eYtkw & s pt tbt a./

asps, re J

d'ywe ath cY u e dw e,,=. vP[.EC?% r. %%~n eQ~Ad e?~/ e /frSuad 't m *e Xc. In-bv e v <. Twt 4. 4 s. 2 - < c a. c,) upaa y a+sMe i ... - - = =. -,.. -.. .......,.......r..... 4. I 4 ,_.-,,-,-------_--_,--,,,,,~,_,--,_._,._.-_._-,,.._m.. ___--...,,_--_,,.__,_-_m----.-. ,---_,,_,,+,r_--.,

9 -t-e d @ e 3 -1, /& c;6m It' md i n a> h 9 em L i. w% eje ~k 7% L n n +dt-bip6t@ c n s$aa,. p,, ? s k d a b O b h %~ s l u J T (0 wra J rD-m h<d,;4 ti c n u ss ~as;k cls,. w w,h 4h 4M ' a# b C' N h/db AIM fra, w C /4 olp my LvU\\w u L , N ., ^ ~ f R ~ ^ +4 _ b; :: ~:,,2Ng, y y 7 M C, [Cua %

  • l* I L{ t Guffon 3,t S

C LLL PSG '.s X,; a ) L b Q s (Tft,,= 4 p ;t t up 9,~., d

  • 1%

s y n ~<1 ., A a nt-s La L h Th e d. m ?.h 'n u d <a r. c O i y n,,9 en Th aby;ha,u ycs 7t d, s e:, s ;. - a. oc/ ,n . C U a.1 L 6sl<.O.e ). e

t' ~T k .il i ei. L hs J,.- V "p n T lh G. Dd r-(wee L,Y6/72-is a-Tla7 Th~ zg y wc n-4 o~-ci D -y g SwT ik rn c r om 1aissa va ~. e e. n a[ CP-[SS N H's n rf r L /

>, & ll(/N 5 W b OT re.$ 0

.wu cd %)>upn,v a, ta,now7 cJR nJ &nnyuw]sNap a,a y a- ~ ke e/9 q-j h-auiakp u, w ~,.; -r-s-s;.any Ao-C <a;L wJ th ivet Fn i4 rh m a a n w $~ J~ J x s p.~. u L p n d b ~ ,J rza rt a,k,,;~ t s 7 x mL 1%T tti Du r/ 'h aTi ~;r< & rb $ua+ ache % LN& ~- t 4 k of -7 rd~cyn ac~pha/ 2 y A -,, 4 / /a sq/p p/ c _/ ,_/ pc F.m / /t //u '; u 'd' ds La hg sui % W I. c

b 1 Document Name: f y h AM 25 l Requestor's ID: I DEDIR02 ,,). ) Author's Name: ( polusny Document Coments: 10/22/84 redraft fr dw diskettes #6002 F0lA-85-59 s37s

I Rev. 1/ 10/25/84 AM-25 / CP6 l SSER Miscellaneous '1, Broken Internal Wires in Polar 2 1. Allega Spg: Crane Festoon Cable

2. g g:

AM-25 i 3. Chara gn: It is alleged that internal wires were broken in the i pola stooned cables and that the polar crane hit unspecified hang operating. i 4. Ass. Safety Significance: The alleger was interviewed by the NRC August 3, 1984, to obtain additional information regarding the n On August 30, 1984, the NRC staff and a Texas Utilities Ela,any (TUEC) quality control (QC) inspector visually examined thi l cables. There was no visible damage on any of the cables. In a review of preoperational inspection megger test data srled that all tests were satisfactory. T f visually inspected the polar crane during three rotations to d'there were any interferences between the crane and supports or clied items. The NRC staff noted no interferences. It is i e

5 possible that the alleger was referring to the problem of the uplift lugs striking the crane girder s'tiffener plate's, which is described in noncon-formance report (NCR) No. M-81-00064; however, this problem was resolved in accordance with DCA No. 11311, Rev. 1. On September 12, 1984, the NRC inspector, accompanied by a Brown & Root (B&R) QC electrical inspector and electrician, opened the two electrical junction boxes that feed the festoons on the polar crane walkway. The inspector visually inspected all of the wires in both boxes and found no broken or non-teminated wires. The NRC staff asked the operator of the crane about problems with the crane, specifically asking if the limit switches cut out properly. The crane operator then demonstrated the operation of the bridge crane, running it until the limit switch cut out and a signal light indicated. Again he stated that there were no problems with the crane. The NRC staff determined from a BAR QC inspection that no records or nonconformance reports existed which may have documented the alleged defective festoon cables, since they were classified as nonsafety-related. The NRC staff found only the records for megger testing which were previously discussed.

t o wn. , 1 jff. g,a f A Y ( D '/' '.. 'I /Cf '40 ' ;(,; C d 5 ' N -- o ~ t ~~ d:.. zw , Qk<ffB-pu,aJ 6 f, e.. ~A kiou ?A}}- ( 6:xeu',it.s'.A AM6/ae I l

  • )

I 1 '.]l1.'.-[f/( C .s. f. JOJJ. < WWM '-l o l/ ~ /** / .,a. e.- y ste-ar ~' opJ wu'll 1w s.4.eO J < ~ dbd.J n '+;$l...~, Jf /I =:n (w: w.aaws w.a y u /#$ l As <U l O ll lG Sl V It/1 o ccai.mi} amAy etlo..ef./.4:pa,'u sm. a.p.d,.i..t., piubb.:, s.s07~ 'ua, i:u. h sII..i.: n,;&ll l$6.f)vje c.onz/;t!i/J#C w O .'.n.y w.x ayed IaT, h c2b 4M9.6 x oyu~..k., w s.A< p).u9 r.'i 9;.~;. JA j< h,,u/.x/c.Oiet g/is?' W.s&.ii n : p' t& y o a t

  • Ci..h :l.!

M;- < n i. t n{ W. !:' Y:., /Y'$ht. - din nm *{!,9' t'!bl Y~.f . l(IJ '<1 :. I G9.T '.A u $ t ' '.'rrt- .u.lL. d ><.'<.x.a u s,4 DT'hc6d%si,%',F6lA45-59 .m. a; m

y;&w gWg,(' * *... g.'u, ~ C !TA e rf Q n j.d.r..sv4c M..:)d. G o d a y h

3. s & j @, g 6 # f w

- a A s' % p '& was n< y. g i- / .;U lx *AM&rL/.q;,y-bc -3y1WJ.4: 4R,e o t -24 92 's: ' ch w w~ b n. s.,x.c s. a W *

  • A+ m<<

w - ~ m-ss e, m

  • a V. i n] y, b '. 0 's

'-1 5 " A,. f 49lC/le'wy - 9 ::q s>,A-(.'el.5-'<Y.N( ghhh /.a/b/!s . l.' Ca,' AbNA.4l.y.vYoffdEwLG GC,P '.bl,? w : A ,u enn { WWJ. Y).l A .A A./T* f f.. ^./ . ^ 0 n/ ~ ? Jn r..3 i .+A 4 a W.ir *.. ~ -v LM-reu<k J A 't M %' &cu ml<4. gw 3t d - M i lf51 ,~ .in .. ;, /. --.. /4 4.u 9 8 g ,s e M W 0T* " Y (o9no')~n Uwa y d.'stusi n s e u d ' ,. /) f.s,:/ ;Y!S D A4.c h-W., bf 4 ?. ;. :-J, a iw / n - ~-! w ma. W /a dat.4. k p$?.22 2:$n-:Lul.!'af-l1: .' W 5 2 b ( S .*' W' *

    • (.f Y

e" Y 'Y.A ~ ~) . f-f$ .r .ov gp+~ J ih ,m.41-c... p. 9 c ~ -. -4 ) ain u w iin-2.4 g .w.,. a = s, W M,i, n w. m, n

..,,.1in. s.

0 4 f././28 u..o+. w t.N&<.. &B ',% wp.u '..v. ; .u;. ys e, w '-A Q ' a 9 .i.*.o.oh wo A % N 1.Nc. ac.<0 Ws'~ A dL c i.'n.:c Ii 0p.A, /#6, n n n +M-F0lA-85-59'

SSER. 1 iw% i Dy y ..f '. a 5' ] ~ 1. Allegation Grouo: b u p c,c>m.y o, M c c s.>._u.A m o c, 3 2. Allegation numbers: d Characterizat(ion:' Li's AC 3. C q lC Q G C VI C S - ?C::cCCUC h'm.- L (c.: " C y : y. .' ** ; '.~

's s'i c L A t cI'$ I N) C Gc-:N C, A.NJD a rJot. N G f. L g ::.e.:3 McTce. Crcr. " G*s

,._;.,,. m. :,., c :...... r m i c J wwemJeNc.,ycosonc.c: s.t .m 4. Assessment of safety signiftcance: JccT c c P M,C $ h.'CL -T /.tv :. L sp ss c

  • gr E Nr.'C u C e y.i e g cp sa c t.tg i c e " pit c, s 'hpc'iX Pc c ca per t p : :. r..~ e n 5.y..

LDn f P. t'.'. ). (. 9 : r. s ' 6(' rec /;icu .\\ireesAu',ar 13 ? O ct. c. - :. ~ ;. + L % t 6 :,. y c,. 7. c.? m. y. 3. p. s'. ? q' &.: n r, c. v [ ~. p pa ::. F c:.c.r. v e n y, P.*. ; ; 'e *. i t., C J., F '.'. 4 ' C c d. L, J~. 2. 0 " i c t; d.. C,,',' t C C C f ;' C E i.,: ' j f s: e l is iJ '", ' ').'" Cf L. A C C. C N' A LJJ C S. h ere c c v u ce

... r w. e s. e c.s.6 i
. zw. c.ec r'c c r x l ' c ' '
  • hs/ t T C FETAI L.Cr) sw C.4 NII

. ~ J PL ' /Ji ic; t,J, Te.t.,V.~,LCC.0 't (, i T O FM(- 9I } '.i c. * :[ J(,7p C O F TO C C/ 5".'; -! 4, go % hv w - -../GT v 'C&:

  • C' "

9; Xo.. k.. 1... s.o E- ~ c,.,,,,,, / ( l,. l. u. a.. ~. ,,,;....7 k 'c.:.. 4 :. : < ~ - ~ ~l " .2-A.*.

  • 't' al '- V T C M2 T-5 f 'Ji Ti ; '/

i. 1 C Vj g L, q t M 'C.1 NJ F W C A 7i0 9 5, c " Hie /;;. 3 C:. ' JC *.i'.I f S. Conclusion and staff position: CE./lC w',i C N P.' C. 9TA5' F C a - c':,,.;:. /

  • b Y.{.. " f 9 'il #

it. A.i. ':. '., C U :'J U CCCC's D C c 'J C '- UDW TU !q[1,, ~ sa . ' ' A:-C:dC A')J 5 ~~ ' ' C C. ', C 7.*.:. T% 'i o i. ( I',. l: 1 L c p :

  • P. t C.i t e. 2. Y t.. L >J 7/ t s 't C r D 1 c ".. U ~ s T..-

VO # J'7V C.5 '.')O L./,.",iot.",**,. 6. Actions zRequired : uw b. >v' 1 e W' t) a y /, .k*y 'N

0. (c9 x

td (r%. p -0/A 59 Q 1 3 \\8\\

ucce s , - -h 8. Attachnents:iETrsrc.TXX-6JDO('"-ICU .; c., c o ugc 2N;ncc iou r;rorcT. f.0 A.4 0 ~I I '4 0 t.e,c $ ppt t,' Gb' bC AN E '1 ' " 7 oc.pseg 9. ReYr'eic oddinhNs!. "I g p n s *n c-rec a vv ee. ' c p.,-;.,: t. J. 4 (, ', a c. Si e (. c,p.c,hy.G.6C24'.10(I'CII'0F' OPE 2*\\~'iC'OII'"#It"'S)

p, c,p r.;. 3, q c.p'. 2 (, C D 'C'.
,te r aw 6h

( 3) (l,,09 VG (2 fA s N IP. & Co 2-f25 10. This statement prepared by: J A C K C# d o r. L,'>l M {!i!$d Name Date Reviewe'd by: Group Leader Date Project Director Date e s 3,3 F0lA-85-59 sJ E-

C0l%f;CHE PEAL; OPEtt ISSUE DATA C0tiTitiUAT1011 SHEET tiRC TRAti:IriG F40. / I i ,L. i; ( i. sL) a 3, Oc,2 -r. c g e.c e.r i c ra T e w e t s c. i s c u -r o e u p e w u s r> w c e A ttj e-T.' *C #iD tJ G.. s> F0 A-85-59 s,..< n, 1.

4 I i O' (v k

N ,2 ict-83co5 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY k OFFICE MEMORA ND UM To ne-tandy.innne Glen Rose. Temas .innunry 6. 1991 C Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station sub g Dum=y Fuel Assembly Receipt l Enclosed for your files are the receiving records for the December 15, 1982 dummy fuel assembly (and RCCA) shipment from Westinghouse. The following copies of records are enclosed: Bill of Lading Notice of Shipment Quality Release Form Fuel Receiving Record - Shipment Report (Form RFO-201-1) Fuel Receiving Record - Container Report (Fore RFO-201-2) Fuel Assembly Inspection Record (Form RF0-201-3) Please contact me if you should have any questions. / .} w c'W llie J. Nfxon ( ' W !WJN/M cc: D. W. Braswell ARMS F0lA-85-59 *=

( COMANCHI PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT NO. X CYCtE NO..nA ' DELIVERY INSPECTION FUEL RECEIVING RECORD - SHIPMENT REPORT DATE/ TIME 82/4/3d /0 ? De aw i Ided,M boose VENDOR: Ai3F (fo k. bb P d/) VENDOR SHIPPING DATE / 12-o7 8'2 CARRIER: r NUMBER OF CONTAINERS: os c [b SITE DELIVERY DATE/ TIME 2/sM.d 9 *3D se SHIPMENT NUMBER: O SHIPMENT BY: AIR

  1. TRUCK RAIL CONTAINER SERIAL NUMBERS: 133

/ / / / / azist,M,/ / / / / DOT /ICC NUMBER: r

  1. iew c.

STACK _ HEIGHT: 1. 2. 3. 4. LOAD RESTRAINS INTACT: __TES / NO ! NOI EXTERNAL DAMAGE: YES COMMENTS: %lsuerY m w er d bruk hoorf re<{tbeh en No ho%r bowM ' GOMe. beep noshes nnded eA Ikk-L h.) ) 00 M rs kd) be CONTAI CLEAN: TES NO VERIFIED SHIPPING PAPERS: / TES NO ' Gov A ? \\n h r_f v S 0 o n b ed o tet e r rueon COMMENTS:

  • 1 I~

MISSING CONTAINERS: TES / NO d hec-ind 4 Domh fa se COMMENTS: v J J DELIVERY VEHICLE STORED IN: NA SHIPMENT RADIATION SURVEY: SAT. UNSAT. 1 O. m Let RadhionProtectionTechnician i b d 87.-- COMPLETED BY A w Lead Net /Juel Receiptf/ uspector (Level II or IIT)/Date ~ l l Form RFO-201-1 l,.' :.1 e L

f O t COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION UNIT NO. i-CTCLE No. i. DELIVERY INSPECTION FUEL RECEIVING RECORD - SHIPMENT REPORT

,s h/

Xa,*J'N Date/ Time .s-/o/p3 / Jo :re' Vendor

  • e.5br\\ A kmC ap o

a r Ca'rrier: CSS # Leu 646 Vendor Shipping Date

  1. -2-ry

/ Bumber of Containerss 4 Site Delivery Date/ Time 5 /4-/g-3 / /.Wra-. Shipment Number: e d o -.2 J uf-Shipment By: AIR [ TRUCK RAIL Container Serial Numbers /7/ / Jo / 4/ / (# / 93_/ F 2.- Seal Numbers Verified: / TES NO Stack Height: 1. 2. / 3, 4. Load Rastrains Intact: / TES ~ NO External Damage:

  • TES

/ NO Connaents: D b!ivern l/Skse !& P ed on bry M4h{ $,'O bM* l Containers Clean: / TES NO / Shipping Papers verified: / TES NO Comments: Missing Containers: TES / NO Comments: Delivery Vehicle Stored In:

  1. ,, / g/2, fm 'f/,z f

[ 'UNSAT. Shipment Radiation Survey: SAT J Y/ Radia' tic 6 Protection Technician F I/I /Iwo 2 / f 4!/'J Inspected BY: (,F6e17ece t Inspg/cfor Date isoA / d REVIEWED BY: b i L(y New Fuel li alpt Engineer Cate F0lA-85-59 Form RFO-201-1 l

J ~ COMA.%.ar., PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION I UNIT NO. i CYCLE NO. 1 DELIVERY INSPECTION FUEL RECEIVTNG RECORD - CO?rrAINER REPORT EXTERNAL C0ffrAINER INSPECTION ShipmentNumber:l[c4o-tJVM Container Serial Number: JR Container Bolts Intact:

  1. YES NO Labels and Marking Intact:

/ YES NO Security Seals on Container: / YES NO Seal Numbers 2 7Je g / J 7,2 $ 9 4 Container Pressure Diff.:

  1. YES NO Remarks:

(Note unusual dents, scrapes, missing parts, or other signs of external damage.) IlrrERNAL CONTAINER INSPECTION Container Opened: fus / Alnn ? t.2 ' Ogoo flrh3 Location Time Data Radiation Survey (Does Not Include Top Nozzle): SAT UNSAT wb-FS w Radiatiod Protection Technician Bolts Missing: SAT UNSAT l NUMBER 4 Accelerometer Tripped: SAT UNSAT NUMBER Container Clean: SAT / UNSAT Fuel Assemblies in Place: SAT / UNSAT Protective Cover Free of Rips, Holes, and Scratches: SAT / UNSAT All Clamps Closed and Tight: SAT UNSAT Loose or Broken Parts Enclosed: SAT / UNSAT L Jt W Shock Mounts in Good Condition: SAT [ UNSAT Container Gasket Appearance: SAT UNSAT Inside Container Clean: SAT UNSAT Form RFO-201-2 Page 1 of 2 b

D w d-e Remarks: s CONTAINER CONTENTS: (When Facing Nameplate - AFT END) Fuel Assembly No. A A3 c-e 7 ANST No. LHs9sx inossa - - - - ~ ~ ~ - Storage Location IN-1 EN-2 INSERT TYPE (Check one) L R Full Length RCCA yt y rL ~ ~ ~~ ~ BPRA i, A ut Source Assembly ye u& Plugging Device po. 3/. pn.ad Einpty ., 4 y,1 Radiation Survey (Top Nozzle) SAT UNSAT wSL b 7 Radiation Protsetion Technician

  • INSPECTION PERFORMED BY:

'N bw / 87 / FuelReceiptInspetor Bate b / S hb REVIEWED BY: L Lead @elReceig' Engineer / Ds)he ~ Form RFO-201-2 Page 2 of 2 i --.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20210A965&oldid=5483532"