ML20205N064

Affidavit of Rh Strome (Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Contention Number 18).*

ML20205N064
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	03/25/1987
From:	Strome R NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF, PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
To:
Shared Package
ML20205L804	List: ML20205L800 ML20205L934 ML20205M010 ML20205M052 ML20205M092 ML20205M107 ML20205M158 ML20205M198 ML20205M215 ML20205M233 ML20205M646 ML20205M707 ML20205M737 ML20205M753 ML20205M769 ML20205M806 ML20205M871 ML20205M893 ML20205M947 ML20205M981 ML20205N007 ML20205N027 ML20205N064 ML20205N084 ML20205N088 ML20205N112 ML20205N191 ML20205N214 ML20205N234 ML20205N239 ML20205N263 ML20205N267 ML20205N270 ML20205N277 ML20205N282 ML20205N288 ML20205N291 ML20205N296 ML20205N301 ML20205N305 ML20205N311 ML20205N560 ML20205N700 ML20205N814 ML20205N927 ML20205N971 ML20205N977 ML20205P026 ML20205P088 ML20205P126 ... further results
References
OL, NUDOCS 8704020569
Download: ML20205N064 (4)

Text

_ _

' af m

V ,

I l

Dated: March 25, 1987  ;

i I

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

)

In the Matter of )

)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al. ) 50-444-OL

) Off-site Emergency (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) ) Planning Issues

)

)

AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD H. STROME (SAPL CONTENTION NO. 18)

I, RICHARD H. STROME, being on oath, depose and say as follows:

1. The Special Needs Survey conducted by the NHCDA in March, 1986 served to identify persons within the 17 communities of the Seabrook Station EPZ who do not have access to a private vehicle and who, therefore, may require transportation assistance at the time of an emergency.

2. Volume 16 through 32 of the NHRERP comprise all of the 17 New Hampshire Town RERPs. In Section IV of each plan, an attachment to the procedure of the Transportation Coordinator (or equivalent responsible individual)' provides 8704020569 870325 PDR ADOCK 05000443 G PDR

4 1

A the individual town transportation requirements. Included in each list, is a category entitled " Residents Requiring Transportation", which identifies the number of people within this category and the number of buses that have been allotted to meet their needs. These requirements are not f based on an assumption of a specific percentage of the ,

population without cars, but are obtained directly from the NHCDA Special Needs Survey.

3. In each case, the capacity of buses allotted surpasses the number of residents who have indicated that they may require transportation assistance. (A minimum of

-three buses have been allotted to each town regardless of the fact that this capacity far exceeds the requirements in several cases.) The totality of bus resources on which the  !

plans rely is confirmed by letters of agreement contained in

Volume 5 of the NHRERP.

4. The allotment of transportation resources does not' consider the phenomenon known as " ride sharing" which assume i

i that people will, in an emergency, obtain rides in the i personal vehicles of other evacuees. {

5. NHCDA has committed to the FEMA RAC to include  !

language in public information materials and in EBS messages requesting people to provide assistance to others who may be in need.

6. The difference in total numbers of buses shown in Revision 2 local plans and that shown in NHRERP, Volumes 2 i

1 2--

l l-l

y

.i and 4, Appendix I is due to the fact that local plans include-bus numbers for all transit dependent segments of each community. Appendix I~of Volumes 2 and 4 shows the total required only for school populations plus the Rockingham County Nursing Home and Jail. Appendix I will be corrected to be consistent with the local plans. The total number of 482 shown in the Revision 2 local plans reflected the maximum number required at the time Revision 2 of the NHRERP was-issued. The difference no longer has relevance.

Current counts of school populations and other special facility populations, and the most recent results of the

! special needs survey, have increased the maximum number required to 515. This current number of maximum bus requirements does not impact on the sufficiency of 4

resources.

7. It is my opinion that the New Hampshire State and local RERPs identify and provide for the availability of i

transportation resources that amply exceed the capacity I

required for persons who may need transportation assistance at the time of an emergency.

T- ~

'V /) W h_ j Richard H. Strome i 4

l l

1

a i l 1

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK, ss. March 515, 1987 The above-subscribed Richard H. Strome appeared before me and made oath that he had read the foregoing affidavit and that the statements set forth therein are true to the i best of his knowledge.

Before me, M .

Notary Publitt My Commission Expires:

t

.-.- r__...--..__--- .- - - _ . . 7, - , - _ _ _ _ _ , ~ - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ - _ , . - . _ - . - _ , , -

, _