ML20196B074
| ML20196B074 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/28/1994 |
| From: | Funk D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Axelson W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20196B028 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-98-341 NUDOCS 9906230069 | |
| Download: ML20196B074 (106) | |
Text
-
m ,
l J
i l
February 28, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR: William L. Axelson, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards FROM: Donald E. Funk Jr., Office Allegation Coordinator
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATION RE: POSSIBLE DUMPING OF RADI0 ACTIVE MATERIALS IN LANDFILLS (AMS N0. RIII-94-A-0026)
On February 23, 1994,- this matter was discussed with E. T. Pawlik of the Office of investigations Region III Field Office, and it was concluded that investigative effort by OI:RIII is not warranted for the reason given below.
Should additional facts or information relating to possible wrongdoing ,
concerning this allegation become available, please notify me promptly. i This allegation will continue to be carried as "open" in the Allegation Management System pending final resolution / closeout by your Division.
Original signed by Donsid Funk Donald E. Funk Jr.
Office Allegation Coordinator A achments:
AMS Form 2/23/94 S. McDuffie memo cc w/ attachments:
RA0:RIII OI:RIII G. L. Shear G. M. McCann BASIS: Willful wrongdoing was not alleged.
1 i
l
' ~
9906230069 990621 PDR FOIA POST 90-341 PDR
-),[ p j
cpg 3 'MDb (
ALLEGATION ACTION PLAN ALLEGATION NO. RIII--A-0026 i
l 1
l Licensee: Uniontown landfill (non-licensee)
Docket / License No: none Assigned Division: DRSS Attached Pertinent Documents: See attached memo dtd 3/3/94 r
/
I. Division Action A. Prepared by:
D.G. Wiedeman
)
3-3-94 Tec St Date B. Reviewed by: G. M. Mc Cann /7 Se C [ fate '
C. Approved by: . If. Shear 2/1/1V Branch Chief Da'te' II. Alleaation Review Board Action A ation Review Board Member hip
(# w M
/ / Approved As Is pvMW gg 1
proved with Modifications as Documented in Plan. , f11b
/ Disapproved for Following Reasons:
ere 6 a4
/
3 .
/ / d 01 Referral l Yes No b/ $Y Q Allegation Review $ rd Chairman 1 l
ALLEGATION / PERIPHERAL ISSUE ACTION PLAN Concerns and any peripheral issues associated with a concern should be documented on a separate page. Each concern and peripheral issue, if any, should be documented in the followup report as is stated in this plan. If there are several concerns in one area, one page can be used. Otherwise, a separate page should be used for each concern.
/ / Concern No. . . / /
Peripheral' Issues Associated with Concern No. 1 Allegers organization is concerned about possible corruption in both State and Federal agencies in charge of characterization and remediation of the Uniontown
- landfill, Uniontown, Ohio. The allegers organization has requested a congressional investigation into this matter and wants the NRC to take over jurisdictional responsibility for this site.
I. Action Evaluation: The following method of resolution is recommended (circle):
A. Send to Licensee Requesting Response in Days with RIII Followup *
- 8. Priority RIII Followup C. Followup During Routine Inspection Within 60 Days D. Followup with Assistance from OI E. No Action - Outside NRC's Charter (describe basis below)
F. No' Action - Without Merit (describe basis below)
G. Refer to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (possible referral to the EPA, Inspector Generals Office)
H. Other (specify)* see note below
.If the proposal.is to send to the licensee, the Action Plan should describe the general areas we expect the licensee to address.
II. Inspector's Actions: The following areas at a minimum will be reviewed during the inspection into the above mentioned concern and/or peripheral issue. (1) The Region will develop a liaison with EPA-Region V (Chicago) for exchange of analytical data. If any indication of byproduct, source or special nuclear materials are found in the environmental samples we will re-board the matter to resolve this issue. Note- a file and document review regarding this site did not disclose any indication that a former or current NRC licensee dumped radioactive material at this site. (2)The issue of wrongdoing should be referred to the EPA, IG's office.
A. Ob.iective
-B. Methods
- 1. Persons to be contacted: Linda Kern, EPA- Region V, Superfund program
- 2. Documents and/or activities to be reviewed: environmental analys es
o
- 3. Time period to be covered: 1960-present
- 4. Locations / specific areas to visit:NA
- 5. Other areas (specify):
Allegation No. Rlll-94-A-0026 1
1 l
l l
L_..
I
.. (
.- s -
1, .
. 'r
( + l 3/14/94 x" E
. l
! OHIO EPA - DIRECTOR'S OFFICE .S f I c/o MR. Gerry Ioannides, Deputy Director ej .C[ j l
P.O. Box 1049 5% 5 @m l l
1800 Watermark Dr. e E S.* !
-Columbus, Ohio 43266-0149 bE$*@ l 5 8 * .C "
Dear Mr.Ioannidos:
...m."
e$E**
As you. suggested on the phone, I am continuing to document og;t* ,
our concerns regarding our OEPA project manager (Dr. Julie !Jm*
e g E ,c ;
, )
Corkran) for the Uniontown IEL Superfund Site. As you will m jj m
- recall, we do not believe that there has been adequate or ;e a -y proper attention by Headquarters regarding this matter.
agaya once again, this is not a personal attack. As taxpayers and ,e o y o ,c concerned stake-holders in this issue, we believe that we eoo5e have every right to take issue with the IEL project U 5 SSU manager's performance - especiaDywhen we see decisions made -
that will directly impact on the health and welfare of our citizens and that of future generations. $
=
Issues that have yet to be resolved include: 7
- Why, when senior OEPA officials said it was " logical and l reasonable" to do full scans for chemicals and radiation in (
wells already found to be contaminated in Northwest Uniontown, was Dr. Corkran the one to make the decision not to test, when she is neither a radiation expert nor a hydrogeologist? Especially since her predecessor said that i MW. 27 was the "well that would tell the story for the people living Northwest" and the fact that the state then found '
radiation 140 times over background in that well. (We believe the former RPM would have definitely ordered this additional testing we are still seeking)... Corkran's judgement and objectivity is being questioned since she demonstrated bias toward this issue when she said that USGS would be " proven wrong", approx, two summers ago i.e., concerning the radial flow and flow to.the Northwest. This was stated in front of witnesses.
- Likewise, we question Corkran's decision to drop two monitoring wells in mid-stream that showed high radiation readings from August of 1992 located South & Southwest and she failed to continue to resample them for the December and March rounds - even though these were supposed to be FOUR seasonal and consecutive rounds! Her uritten explanation that she fulfilled the obligation of doing 10% splits is not ,
/'
an 4
E '
i 1 .
l l l
accepta'ble (by doubling up on samples from just two locations instead of proceeding wk4h with all four locations) . While Dr. Corkran states that she was not aware of the the high l readings obtained from the August round by the time she ;
conducted the December round, this exlanation is still not !
acceptable. With the health and welfare of children at stake, she should have consulted with Headquarters, if money was really an issue, and then ordered these wells located south and southwest to be resampled at whatever point in time she DID learn about the high readings. We find it very hard to believe she didn't know by the March 1993 round! What makes this situation particularly disturbing is the fact that USEPA reportedly lost its radiation filters for the MW 25 Well that is in question here. Therefore we do not have the proper or adequate information about this well that previously showed high radiation. This omission is very serious because this well is in a residential area where residents in close proximity do not have alternate water (southwest). Note: USEPA's ERT report now states that groundwater from IEL moves in this direction, after denying this for all these years and after refusing to give residents southwest alternate water.
Our original letter of 6/13/93 regarding IEL's project manager discusses double standards apd this problem is still occurring. You will recall that Gill Dr. Corkran demanded j written scientific documenation on various issues from our TAG experts, yet she did not hold USEPA to this same standard when USEPA was diseminating info on the radiation to the press, public and elected officials!
We were truly horrified this fall when, in giving an interview with the Akron Beacor Tournal regarding the newly released USGS Report, Dr. Corkr.n said to the effect in the paper that the local flow rejoi.id the regional flow within a few hundred feet. When we called her boss, Robert Princic, seeking the source of her information, HE even thought she got it from the new USGS Report - that's what he said he assumed!
However, it turned out that she acknowledged to us in writing ,
- after the damage was donc, that her source of information l
was from the 1988 RI report of USEPA's - data that was over i FIVE YEARS OLD 1 This double standard business of Corkran's is really getting obscene, because while Corkran was allowed to get away with misleading the public in that story last fall (it was picked up by the AP and reprinted in other media) - she now is acting with indignation about a newpaper article this past i I
week concerning the USEPA's ERT report involving NORTHWEST l I
b
I
~
Uniontown again and in a phone call jnformed us'itet she was getting aLretraction concerning part of the infernction.
. conveyed by the Beacon Journal. If Ms. Carkran 18 so concerned about accuracy, why didn' t she zequart wach a retraction when she was informed public37 at th+ TIC meeting
\
'last fall that her statements regarding the USGS report were seriously misleading the public? It didn't seem to bother
- her in.the least,then. We find this discrepancy odd and quite disturbing.
We believe that the proper party to seek any retraction should be the party-responsible for giving out the quote or in this case the information. Therefore, since it is the FED'S report, they should be the ones filing the complaint and making the corrections to the paper, not Ms.
Corkran. (As we are constantly being reminded by the State EPA whenever it doesn't want to do something - the " lead" on this case is up to the USEPA - not OEPAl Julie can't have it both ways.)
We furthermore question if Ms. Corkran was the source of the
, comment in this same article that indicated that MOST of the residents in the contaminated area already had alternate water. We question if this is a factual statement. EVEN if
- it is, certainly not ALL residents are hooked up - so the official making that statement should be concerned about the rest of those citizens. Also, the water is.just one
. pathway of contamination that was identified by ERT. Yet the i implication is then thatLthere is no health threat. This is :
not known at this time because gases were not tested in the air in these homes by ERT, so such reassurances cannot be !
made regarding health. .
)
Another serious, concern that citzens have regarding Ms.
Corkran is the way she continually responds to' questions that were' addressed to USEPA officials. She continually interupts
. and answers.for USEPA. This has not only taken place at TIC meetings, but took place in the field during.the ERT sampling of Northwest Uniontown, so much so that a resident had to ask Corkran tcr leave their property so that the resident could speak to the ERT officials without being continually interupted or having Corkran answer for the Feds.
While Ms. Corkran continues to appear to be doing the Fed's work for them - in-fact, many observers have asked us just WHO is it that she works for - major concerns that we have continue to go unanswered by Ohio EPA. We would like to see ouriproject manager do something other than always putting 4
3
1 .
1 down and minimizing our concerns.
In our opinion, since 152 tons of toxic gases are generated at this site per year according to experts, Dr.corkran should demand that ALL possible pathways for these poisonous gases be addressed by USEPA from the I.9L site to BOTH Northwest and Southwest Uniontown - rather than giving the appearance of using her power as our RPM to drop critical testing that potentially may be leaving our residents exposed to known and suspected carcinogens.
U; Yours truly, cc: Concerned citizens of Lake Jack VanKley Twp.
Mick Hr.rrison IEL Superfund Site Debra Dawson l
l Ayk.A3 L,a, Aon g a s, M ~A"da.fdopp p
}h fausta-b a am %A an Leb w,d nin e d ~czh,, 6 ppaa, ja $4 a6 ynnbod w!&$ Lys ah) almg> gd laumai W A L4As Magdgaaanyj hsy M 4hvanlld64
" },!e sveaid' f } sew itk ef Aa ,i jus. "$d a,]A xaa# a'uM/a. a
- m l-ts: s -t#
- JT1 a e %3 ca. s=m. sts tJ
- s 3 N- CZ .0- Q 2"
- PJ O Cm Cm l .
- c-t- l (U r0 "t:2 (D DJ M
- i o sia O cn =t*
- Q as -Q ?
- . - e I r lr--. P-..,
- .S.s
Dear Mr. Ross:
I.N.
Alpha, Gross Deta, and Carbon 14 analysesmental Pollution from December 13,1990 to December 18,1990.
for all s ross A copy of the Chain of Custody record is also included in this package. I to Ms. Maka Grogard with Via/s Sample Management Office in Alexandria Virginia l
Please note that none of the Carbon-14 Inter Laboratory Spike OLS), atrix Matrix S Spike Duplicate (MSD) samples analyzed in support of the analysisnce met the r Quality Control samples to be spiked at a levelWelower have already than the samples for this parameter. contacted Viar SMO to infonn them of this proble s
activity greater than 15 pCi/L, and approximately 20 pCi/g.
e Under the terms of our agreement with Viar & Company, these samples shou
/ y analyzed by Alpha Spectrometry to determine which isotopes are respons We have contacted Viar SMO to request authorization for this additional test.
A copy of the letter sent to Ms. Elenor McClean, the Environmental Coordira discussing 'he c.bove items, is included in this package. An addidonal problem the Gross Alpha / Gross Beta analysis of the suspended solids .
wcs approximately 40%50% of the theoretical value. In all but one case,. this NRC acceptance criteria. r.eering prevented u by this contract be used.We strongly believe that these low recoveries u red occur l
dissolved with acid, then the liquid is evaporated. The proced specified that after the filter was placed on the planchet, a drop of alcohol shoul N ignited.
1m ) material available for analysis. This introduces a considerableThis W
b/
ce tiv
/ %[]
~~
p
~]fjf b $ bv! mM C . <
S f l
A S R I
I k
fp E M
P L
M L
A P
e t
e l
E vP ~ a D
I I
e dg a
- D -
e N79 /
1 .
1 5
9 5
9 1 5 5
4 P
1 y T
4 E
4 E
1 2
/
1 V p t e 5 - 4 o 1
,\ 5 / .
1 r o 9 I
u f 'I 0
I
'v
- i Mo m
- n A ~E - E l
-n
, 2 a ~2 2
- I f
c
- k. 4 1
y l
S D
- G r
o C
r o
2 y
p T
S I
Xr iPo s - D i i s s e s
U t
A s 1
s s 1 s
l 1 f I
1 o 1 I T
l B A f o o e l r S r t p A T e a h n .h E _
s a a C _
, b _
u l E a n
in v
l L DF y ,F I i
t s s
i mD aR i DF rr r aR U N o ie t A A s I o r e C N tA n C e tt T l
e C se n I
i p o
O p c e &I O
I T
S l
&I T R e
.c wm c
/
r 0
5 Ct TN e r
O s Me ii TN r t /o i
s u .o n a g n nf 0 u i l ;
ti t
m i e 6 l m0 t .
a
- n r A e 6 s e s -
a C s t L C
A E t
l
_ m o l
iD me o y b
t
/P l
e r it l Mo l e T .O .O te l S
I m U3
- l D p R c E C c e T a
- u E o 1 3 p t 1
S tS i r Ci c E m t e T / t tS p R O
i U d io e T o L 0 4
L C a
r e
d q/ n.
d l E e P T U
- T 1 O a C O O ,n
_ 2D m i
_1 O R F I J /
/E n 2D T Bn O 0 - _
R /E T 7P 0 A .c E
Y 8 3
/
9 0
2 4
U S U
7
/
9 B
A T E
L B 1
3 1 0 S O 1 5 T 6 7 O d
1_
. 4-4 /
_. 5 9 :
5 3N + +
5A / / 3N 4 _
- M - - :
5A 5- _.
0E S 6 M .
0E 2 0 _
0 W
? P l' O _8 l 9 o B _
u
. t r B _
$ o _
t k a s *
(c C n C s O a p
- f. a t e
a i u
t
< a A t l e r
d x y g t
- e p r 5 .-
g h 0i g o 2 r 4 o a # 5e
- 4 n.
s ./
!.f p g c
/ y S
0 1
s y
r 5
/
B e
t 9 9-8u 2i:
t l 0 a 0 -
6 l l
- 3--
- l 1 2n L 2 8: -
]- O 2 9'i 7
I Cn b ec r 3 T- hs.
~C 2 s.
l'~ s- es>
IV f= s.
I r. < .
,r C3 * - - aa e :a W
fU A
813:
1rJ
- -~ \s. ,..
A ^ w% J re m C
- rr g2 Ii ,-.
I, C.11 1
un e
~s ii la y u w
~-Ca 3 % e,. 4, C
'. m. .$
hW
[- }
- i PJ 3e
' DJ !
O O La J e(eg 1 1 b-4 U1 i u n. gi I o o a in m t
.c o c.' (r.A g r- g 1 * - ,
o o
m 7 %
tc C 2
2, s.,
- 'e. I 1
- u y w Go :r 3 U) s
% $ m
.c k ut t- 2 ~n ~
t- s m C m :23 r+ f* tla ::D 3> m c-e 3> e
- Z -
av n ct 3>
J m e-o s BC ro o i
-1 A* ~m O m
>~ oc m c-rea J U1 m
t
---4 O
Z N
t o -O et et t n 86 e--.
C
<n so
[__ _3 t m
c
.-e El ' O a
-s
-s et O
u o r+
+<*-
.H Z r--
e*
ru %J as ou %o EEs C c-s n r- 3> is c. m a> ore un e+ 0 O i
u3 D 22
( _J m o a
-s r.-) cr
- , .B..n - s as o ic-
, > to O O 7 8L ' - '
9 -
, o o
u o **
u oa ri rD ---i
<i m
/. '
- s\ *---
rv --I EA w
s n n-
-o c-t CD su .-q
'\
\
sm ( r1 c-t- r.O oa-4 o 4 NJ c a. '3 su m e- - r
- A s= <ie ga n i r
as - t4 1."
.3 r +--- O , :D 'e-- C ~ '
3 . DJ C3 - m DJ to
[ %m -
'L ;0 fri W
o 3> , u CD C
r- .O
'% m
%J C 01 %. tis 4 -H %. fu C -O + -O f J' U O C.O ~
O t.r' e-*
u O ~ c.t
~.
4 i4
[ 3 .
4'
% C2
(
.j
. A O 3>
-g
\
\
g O' OZ Cr13>
O ~'I PJ Om -
Om o
'JI i ==
l O O E s C E '
~3 o QJ F nD U sD ~ G..
G (~~') C" "9 gb 3>
c-t e--a W 3E3 80' I m o c-t- t * !
c :=r- su DJ 9 I o na C, C.J I
--s s. o' C 11 44 u=: tI)
-s l 1
J:
m !
cm ,-,.
irn a. \
o ,
gl, -
C !
i
--- t lr.C i
r- -. -
1
L Wc R
a e .
F e
.F L i
E . -
1 ! e.iq 9 ; e .
s
.i c? 1 l 2
. N' 4 /
~
.t' 8 L 1 _
- 1 .J' - ..a (
p
- 3 _
s p r 2 /
t r e t 9 u
.s; 0
i c- .
. .- J k i a' a .!. J E r
- A - a -
v .
2 ! 1 d
2 .- - 4 -
3 l _5 y S
c s i
.0 a
r
,4 5 a M
- M ;
_% r
- : l i I
- - s' G
s 3 P u
. I i
D F l OF
.e i aR i aR I mD t A s tA n ..
i e e C e C c .
n -
t t T p T l R .
. ;? e 0 e aI C e 0i e .
o.
- c O g i p ut s
- O Ct f N ! t g - S is i g t.
1 1 u
,. .* / :.
g n n y q
1 e
m0 e 6 t
s G. . t m i r e _. _A0 6 s
.e d A n a C C t. .
l
- .. .r r o l
i n
o l
g .
. l l S e a ME i !
,. R E tS E R c E tS gR
-. )"
3 1 E.
U e T d
! 58 e I d
l e P E
L C : t' C O .
A.
D T 1 O O T 1 U R .
5 2D e - 2D T .
/E
/E /
- 0 - 0 1 i P C- 5C .
L~ /.U / H .
O 9E 9 92
)
c 0_.3 6 6 04 5
. 1.b r5 .
_.,. . 7 i ..
3N 3N 0A 0A -
U M M -
0E 0E W
" ; ,.. 0
) 3 0.P _.l C
u o
r .
.u r k .
t l .
u U C.o Cc "
6 .n a - d t.t e
au m t 2 a4 r
~
g_2 e.- .
u 5 c
r r.3 y
_. ~
y .6 ..
d' S 9 --
0 l .l u 0 l .l 1 2 .
2 M
~
o
L
/ / /t u cx . /s 10/21/92 Sam Windham - Director National Air & Radiation Environmental Lab ,.,3 1504 Avenue A Montgomery, Alabama 36115 -2601 '3 ' q
- 2,d \'
Dear Sam:
6py
(. '
This letter is regarding the two issues I discussed with Dr. 7 ,r Broadway of your lab : the Plutonium finding and the 21 Gross Alpha and Beta " filter " samples in question.
First of all, I regret having to say to you that our citizens' group is having a very difficult time in understanding just why NAREL / USEPA FAILED to acknowledge whatsoever the valid finding of. Plutonium at IEL, when you had the opportunity to do so on two separate occasions during visits to this community in September ( 9/15 and 18th and 9/30, '92).
Given that we have seen Plutonium show up y proviously (in solid portions of IEL grou,ndwater) from the "
invalid " data of-Dec. 1990, this omission in not ~
disclosing to this town all the facts regarding your !
recent findings is greatly disturbing ! i You 9111 recall that during NAREL's visits to Uniontown, it was repeatedly stated to Congressional staffers, the press, and to us, both privately and publicly, that all the radiation found in the " valid" round was " naturally occurring", referring to the radium, uranium and radon found in the groundwater. Everything was minimized to the fullest degree possible.
Indeed, Dr. Broadway, you will recall, behaved as if he had never even seen his own data before, regarding this Plutonium hit, when I showed it to both of you following the public i meeting held on Sept. 30th ! ( He asked if he could borrow my copy for a minute so he could go and write down the sample ID number and look it up when he got back home ). Then, upon i calling me a week ago Friday, he confirmed that of course it ,
was a true hit of Plutonium found at a depth, he said, of 91 feet down in the bore hole. When I reluctantly ~ asked him why NAREL failed to inform the town about this, he offered the explanation that, IF it had been found at the surface it l wouldn't have meant very much, as it would have probably been t from: nuclear fallout. But, he said they were obviously concerned about this reading, because in fact, it was found at a depth Plutonium isn't expected to be found (at 92 feet.)
Sam, are we expected to believe from this explanation of Dr.
Broadway's that NAREL couldn't decipher its own data this summer when reviewing this data before presenting it to the public and our officials ?! Because that is basically what this is indicating to us. Or that you all failed to check N
. ~Gk' l
v
/ f f/] C N/Il f ~
W I ti //
9= ~n~ @
/ humadammal taunt..
l Controls for Environmental Pollution, Inc.
1 1W5 Flosine . P. O. Box 5351. Sante Fa. Now Mexico 8750c'? . Tolanhone 505/9869e4, l t
( '
i FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Santa Fe, New Mexico -- September 29, Controls f or Environnental Pollution, 1992 -- lOn September 28, 1992 a Inc. (CEP) was provided with copy of an EPA Fact Sheet, dated Septeinber 1992, captionod
" Industrial Data."
A copy Excess Landfill of the Fact ShootDeconbar accompanies 1990 lthis Invalidated press release.Radiation d
f CEP believes that the Fact Shoot is < categorically inaccurate and is d issuing this straight. pross reloaco for the purpose of sotting the record \
\
At no timeCEP undarstand did'sEPA work.staff ever work Although EPA with ataff CEP was staff in trying to staff might have, the EPA, Santa Fe and CEP offerod to address any EPA 's Field Studies Branch,through Mr. Gregg bompsey, Chief of the declined.
The results of CEP's work have in fact be,en validated by the contractor for whom CEP performed the laboratory testing.
CEP performed contractor the Work with procedures approved both by the for whom CEP performed the work and by the EPA.
The only non-standard procedure which cEP employed was one required the by deviatecontractor under from its own its contract with CEP.
procedures. At no time did CEP only two analysos whleh CEP performod gave unexpected results.
While duplicate under normal practico CEP would havo immediately undertaken prohibited tosting to verify the resulto of the first tost it wao from doing so under its contract with the contractor.
CEp subsequently sought and obtainod permission from the contractor to do duplicato testing and the new results as expected by CEP were in conformity remaining sanples.with the results of analysos performed on the to the contractor. The results fron the reanalyses were provided Certain samples analyzed by CEP woro assigned identical tracking numbors as a result of the fact these samples were erronoously assigned before theyidentical sainpletonumbers wore provided CEP. by the contractor or the EPA )
i CEP kept custody and has in information. its records complete and accurate chain of s chain of of custody documentation the EPA or the contractor it was apparently due to the f ailureIf M information. to provido him with complots CEP nev r provided, nor wo it ever requested to '
provido, While CIP to offered Mr. Dempsey a copy to provido Mr.of Dempsey itc report to the contractor.
complete roport, Mr. Dempsey declined. with h copy ci the CEP's report was neither illogible, poorly organized or incomplete CEP believoa that the results of its analyses are both accurate and .
reliable based upon the internal quality control measures ecployed by it which meet or exceed NRC and EPA ctandards.
CEP has learned from Mr. John Perrocono of the EPA'o Divicion 5 Offico of Public Mr. Dempsey Affairs that. the Tact Sheet is based solnly upon
'a "impressiona" Mr. Perrecome " assumed" but could not verify that Mr. Dempsey followed proper procedures in donying CEP an opportunity to address tho allegations set forth in the Fact Sheet before the Fact Shuet van disseminated.
CEP believes that Mr. Dempsey's impressions result frcn an unexplained bias against CEP which Mr. Dempsey manifosted prior to the time this CEP distributed any report or completed ita analyses. In regard, CEP has obtained a copy of n January 10, 1991 memorandum fro:n Mr. Denpsey to Ms. Jan Pela of the EPA's Region 5 Samplo press Control Office a copy of the memorandum accompanies thic rtisane.
In this nomorandum Mr. Dempsey statos: '
Uhon we spoke on January 3, you told me that controls for Environmental Pollution (CEP),
Inc., had been eclected to do the sample
.ohio.
analysis for the Landfill Superfund Site in I must caution you in using CEP for data analySio. CEP has an inconcistent track record when analy:ing comploa for EPA. I have direct experience in dealing with laboratory. this analytical In the timo that I uced their servicos, I sonotitoc found it difficult this lab. to validato the data generated by If I had known that CEP wac bidding for this contreet, I would have reconnended seeking other bids.
l * * * *a If you will renombor, I oncouraged you to l
! coloct laboratorieu for the bid prcceau with provan track records. I gavo you nanos of l Several laboratorica that fit thia
- l. doccription.
To the best of CEP's knowledge at no time prior to January 10, 1991, the dato of Mr. Dempsey's memorandum, did CEP ever have any 2
a
,/
. ,/
hil p '
r-hA yb 9
h ibDiOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES Meritorandtini To: Hank Cole From: M Resnikoff, RWMA Date: November 18,1992 Suh. lect: Radiation Measurements at IEL We report here on our review of two boxes of" invalidated" data taken at IEL, the "licalth Assessment" by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, March 1989, radioactivity data taken September 1991, January 1992 and residential and monitoring well sampling results taken May 1992 by Ohio EPA.
General Comments Industrial Excess Landfill (IEL) is located in Lake Township, near Uniontown, Ohio. The landfill operated between 1969 and 1980, receiving an estimated 780,000 tons of waste, including one million gallons ofliquid waste. The site is capped with permeable material and veg::tated. The site was never licensed to receive radioactive materials. During IEL's operating period, commercial radioactive landfills at Maxey Flats, Kentucky (through 1977) and West Valley, New York (through 1974) were available. The Department of Energy had its own landfills at Portsmouth (Ohio),
Paducah (Ky), Oak Ridge (Tenn), but Mound Laboratory (Miamisburg, Ohio) used Maxey Flats untilit became unavailable. Local residents report seeing trucks with nuclear symbols. Based on !8+ years experience working with local residents across the country, this is not an observation I would dismiss out of hand.
IEL is located in an excavated gravel pit above shallow and deep aquifers, probably the worst location for a toxic landfill. Infiltrating water can rapidly move downward to the underlying aquifers. Toxic and radioactive materials would not be adsorbed by such soils. Toxic chemicals, such as vinyl chloride, benzene, chloroform, methylene chloride, lead and cadmium have been measured at IEL, but we have not seen any systematic risk assessment calculation of the hazard or risk to local residents, as is usually carried out for an RI/FS investigation. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry is woefully understaffed and more rigorous calculations could be performed to determine the risk using EPA's IRIS database and standard calculational techniques we have seen at other Rl/FS piojects. For iisk calculations, a person should be assumed to be living on the IEL propetty, using well water, and irrigating a garden. It appears that the greatest.
-a Ma vin Resnikoff,Ph.D.+ Fenior A <xiate 306 West 38th Street, Room 1508+New York,New York 10018+ Telephone (212)629 5612
Radiation Measurements at IEL 11/18/92 Page 3 Since we are neither lawyers nor familiar with the laws and e only legal prec suggesting that inw enforcement agencies look into the matter. ,
Invalidated Data EPA QA auditors. Before discussing the issues .
It is obvious that the USEPA is not a disinterested party to the result that the Rl/FS process must be re-opened, ne,and the risk a remediation design take this additional hazard into account. Almost any measuremem can be critiqued; the US EPA seems to have expended enor to invalidate the results. As we discuss below, many y of s the A criticisms auditors are relatively minor while others are potentially fatal and could results. EPA's OA auditors simply barraged the data with criticisms, ho some would stick. To parody a Shakespeare line, "they protesteth too much."
While it may seem' obvious how to measure radioactivity, it is not just a
~
walking over a landGli with a Geiger counter and seeing the needle .
subtleties are involved, of which local residents should be aware. To l results, measurements must be compared to background levels in the fieldI lab. Then, proper laboratory methods must be followed: the volume the sample must be accurately measured since the results are expressed as ,
concentrations, pCi/l or pCi/g. The geometry and efficiency of the detector must taken into meaningful account, results. particularly to measure samples for sufficient times For the August 1990 sampling and measurements by ESE, counting were too short, panicularly for the small sample sizes employed, leading to!
book and the samples were destroyed in the pro ,
j could not have been recounted, though perhaps the gross a and p measurem !
have been recounted. I therefore agree with the USEPA that the data were .
While agreeing with their basic conclusion, I want to point out that some criti were relatively minor, such as the proper forms for data. Other criticisms r, were in e Radioactive Waste Management Associates u
ts
(
//
N' OIIIO 44632 LLE Since I1930 -
NI"
%%. amt'de muu FRIDAY, OCTOBER 2,199 ient Radiation Lab Miller Rez<
r4 Calls EPA *>
% More' than 150 people jammed Fact Sheet uke Tewnshig i<aliiasi Thersoal
. the Zoning Commission public h ffCategorICal@ inson Amendment 92.i40-ZA,a quest by Hartville Auction, Inc.
Inaccurate" rect =ssify two tracts ofiand from
. Lab Stands Behind Data may Re,';!n*,ia$").l o ,'ns I' ing EPA's fact sheet by Tammy Proctor Commercial General. The propc Controls for Environmental ib!!u- change had been approved by tion, Inc. of Santa Fe, New Mexico Regional Planning Commission. A issued a press release late Tbesday call- nearly three hours of hearing questi and comments, the Zomng Comt
' ' .~j " categorically inaccurate", si n approved the proposal, wt The press release states: "The now g es to the Board of L
- l*s' *d- results of CEP's work han in fact been Township Trustees, wto will scher
- 00 P.M.
validated by the contractor for whom a public hearing within 30 days be!
<by Tim.
.here ws!! CEP performed the laboratory making their decision. i testing." CEP states they followed all Many of the people present at !
es, procedures set by the EPA. "At no time hearing were residents of its willbe and did CEP deviate from its own pro- C verleaf akrnemn nhofAndo !
l cedures." Street, expressing concern about i
CEP claims only twe analyses gave p ssibility ofincreased traffic, po ,
i:nexpected results. CEP consequent- ble decline ofproperty values and I ;
ly sought and obtained permission to f the W atmosphere provided by P o=eiicate iesii"a a#d i8e #ew 1='
' reseits.
j as expected by CEP, were in confor- *"i=" e' esc"r ce" ries 1992 - Floward Miller, Sr., president mity with the results of analyses per-lillage of formed on the remaining samples. The }{artville Auction, plans to move
! caves for results from the reanalyses were pro. Hartville Kitchen restaurant and es should vided to the contractor. Dea market operation to the ares note than In the press release CEP sands by question, w hich comprises two tra .
- If grass. its record keeping and claims they kept ofland located on the south side ofi he leaves, i
an accurate chain of custody. drews Street and the east side of Ka l here is no CEP beliews EPA's in ulidator, man Avenue, nonh of Sta6e Route ( !
GregE Dempsey, was biased toward These tracts are adjacent to land fn i their lab and hase provided a tmg n R ute 619 owned by Mr. Mil I
memorandum to back up their state- and n! ready zoned for commercialv e ment. Thomas Grumbly's March 1992 . Afichac! Ogline, attorney for H:
report also questioned Mr. Dempsey's ville Auction, displayed an arti:
ictiveness impartiality. rendering of the Miller project, wh fhazards ;
The fact sheet released September includes buildings for the restaur. j 16,1992 to citizens and local officials and flea marker operation, and a futi building planned for another ret l
concerned radiation data at IEL.
Controls for Environmental Pollu- enterpnse jn the fumre. He noted t!
tion, Inc. (CPE) stated that at no time the $$ million project could eventu did EPA staff ever work with CEP's . ly generate S75,000 in addi:ional p staff in trying to understand CEP's peny taxes. There is to be an aco I wark. CEP claims, atthough invited, road from Route 619into alarge pai Mr. Dempsey declined a visit with ing area, which Mr. Ogline said shot a <= them. alleviate the present traffic problea Ch.Y.3 This press release resulted from this n ma market days. The tract to 7,a,,,,,, , paper's inquirp. Until September 28, rez ned R 1 includes about 45 ac
- _, l u CEP had never seen the EPA fact n Kaufman and Andrews whi
, , , , , , , sheet. would eventua!!y be sold as 100 ,
l r- : m --
t -
I
x 1 1 i:
1 3 1 ty. s C g/ 50 /7 g 3 9 5 E
~ i 2 0 m m${j S dt D 0 R. 0 Y 4 W0 E.0 T4 0
1 2
1 0
0 5
%pC w;G$
- p. -
i
$ S L
n 5 5 4 1
$ A a/ , '
N v p 0 p 0 0 0 D
C0 iC0 J
n, i 2 1 0 1i F 4
v3$ LL
/ 1 g 0 g/ 71 9 3 I 1 y
, D 10 W0 0 0 6 R. 0 0 yu.
/ Y1 4
E.0 T1 4
9 0 1
9 ;yfN i R
A p 0 p0 D
I 0 0 C3 i
/8 C.3 i 2
/
3 3
0 ! O g 9 g 9 1 0
9 3 C _
O 1 0 W0 1 0 1
1 0 .y;Wd
.q qi H .
R.
Y 60 E.0 T6 4 0 3 . .CN !I E 1 1 1
/ >
M I
C p 0 C.1 p 0 C0 .
0 0 -
A i
/0 i
/8 1
6 0
2 i L g 2 g6 s 5
+- W' s Cf R i 1 0 1 D 0 8 0 W0 0 0 E
Df
. Y 3 E.0 9 0 3 D 2
T3 2
1 8
S _
U d _
,. L _
T p 0 p0 0 0 , ae -: S C1 C.
i 1 1 0
, i 2 l /0 1 0 .
g 4 g 5 1 5 #g f"j 3
i hc; 1 sg D 0 R. 0 W0 E 0 0
0 0
. n62 f Y 3 8 0 .oi I t aa&
T3 0 i
5 5 9 fk e3 i k I
, l- p 0 C.
p0 N N ~
C 0
, ,w $,
D D b /2 i 0 g/ 61 i
/1 g 4 '
l / D 0i W0 .i$
kuf" o
&# / / / R.
Y 10 E.0 -
- n A
- C5-o
/B 3 T1 3
~u iN "
,k"4 0 jr ee d>
, rE W/fb O
/
p0 C0 p0 C0 N N , 2' f
'Y' D D m, .
i i
/9 g/8 e#Of g 6 1 <I D 01 N R. 0 W0 b A Y 2 7
E.0 T2 7
n@lh i h i i
I d#
^
C& l '
Landfill Gaseous Monitorina Well Radon Conceptrations:
Samples of soil gas were collected from the intermediate depth of nine perimeter lanfill gaseous monitoring wells. These wells were the same ones samples during a previous trip to IEL in August, 1991. A duplicate sample was collected from one monitoring well, and an atmospheric blank collected at the end of the sampling. The samples were collected using standard gaseous sampling procedures of the contractor.
During the August trip a blank sample was collected by filling a gas sampling bac with air that had passes through the sampling pump, rather than filling the bag in a negative pressure chamber as is the standard procedure. This sampling pump had been used to collect a sample from a well with a positive radon value {
immediately before the' blank was collected and contained a small I amount of trapped radon which was transfered to the blank sampling bag. A seconc* blank was collected on September 4 and sent to NAREL for analysis. Data for this blank is given below. f Each sampling bag was connected to the NAREL scintillation cell manifold and transfered to a 125 ml cell using our standard procedures for calibration of the cells. The manifold was purged with dry nitrogen between samples. All samples were counted for 400 minutes. The radon concentration is decay corrected to time of collection.
Landfill Gaseous Monitoring Wells NAREL Sample PRC Sample Collection Radon-222 ID Date Time Activity ID (pci/L)
IELR 91.6497 I E--l-R-B 2 9/4 16:25 EDT 0.6 i O.1 IELR 91.7327 IE-2-LG-16-28.7R 9/29 17:30 EDT 38.6 1 1.1 ,
l IE-2-LG- 9-14.6R 9/29 17:43 EDT 528 0.3 IELR 91.7328 IE-2-LG-15-14.7R 9/29 18:00 EDT 936 4.9 IELR IELR 91.7329 91.7330 IE-2-LG-13-18.6R 9/29 18:17 EDT 115 ! 1.9 b 18:26 EDT 512 3.7 IELR IELR 91.7331 91.7332 IE-2-LG-17-21.8R 9/29 IE-2-LG-18-17.6R 9/29 18:34 EDT 71.8 1.5 p[
l I
18:42 EDT 544 3.7 IELR 91.7333 IE-2-LG- 2-19.5R 9/29 .s IELR 91.7334 IE-2-LG-19-27.9R 9/29 18:51 EDT 3590 t10.7 x
<- IELR IELR 91.7335 91.7336 IE-2-LG-19-27.9RD 9/29 IE-2-14-12-27.9R 9/29 18:53 EDT 19:05 EDT 3640 755 1 9.7 4.9 0.8 0.1 IELR 91.7337 IE-2-LG-BLANK 9/30 10: 90 EDT The estimate of the error for each analysis includes the systematic errors for calibration of the scintillation cells and the 2-sigma counting error. The listed error term is in pCi/L.
i
sncorned Citizens of Lake Township
/[ P.O.123, Uniontown, OH 44685 Hr.
NARELSam Windham USEPA
- Director 1504 Avenue A g ((jf '
Hontgomery, Alabama 36115-2601
Dear Sam:
Concerned Citizens of Lake Twp.-(-IEL S just' received our-letter sentyour letter to us dated 11uperfund Site ) has l
immediately respond, point by pointto NAREL ..
We are of Octoberto21. /10, in respd compelled First.of all, you~ acknowledged that Dr disclose-the-Plutonium finding during hi Broadway failed to .
public at the. September'30th meeting s presentation to the this data. was put into the package tha t W.- but say that at least Does Plutonium data and NOT the general c, ven thispublithis !
mean that Cortainly, be the ones to shoulder this burden n ormingof thei ftown ?
so that WE oculd residents absolutely have THE RIGHT information. TOtheKNOWUSEPA kn
_that Plutonium inhaled or ingested-can suchcommon killIt.is critical knowledge tha a person. of have manythis consuming innocent water. childr'en, and pregnant We still women who are Instead of b,eing. honest and forthcomi
-(as radiation),USEPA had-promised.they-would be,regarding thng with this co e
quite to thezealous officials manner to play down ALLit seems s way in in aSeptember it we continually.repea, and " naturally occurring." ting that all the radiatipressbyand eventually the public indicate tcr a Not once did USEPAon was low level dangerous mannyone made radiationthat ANY of your data showed veryeven slightly there, ! 4 when you knew otherwise ? Why was such a spin put out Hext, your failure found US.,
to inform the public by implying at IEL -is really no' different a thaytletter this of response the Plutonium detonations OR even from " spaceclear atmosphere during reentry probewhere weapons fallout may ha
! s" burning up in the 1
.in ourfletter of.10/21 that Dr. WeBroadway, have already relayed to you borehole onsite at 92 feet deepconfirm:the e bottom of a Plutonium results fo i
" concerned" about this finding said.that you were w
l inhich yourthis most Plutonium recent was infactfound. - because of the DEPTH at "may" be However, you indicate attributablelette'r
. layers over periods ofto time." that Plutonium beneath the surface
" materials
' just? meant regular surface soil While we are sure thit you in added to a landfill 1 to a, g ryte, ,t, o tjte point that s used to cover dump waste, we we have been told that the
' . ./
L 1 i
i nuclear trucks brought into IEL indeed mixed or " layered" their waste right into the flyash ! But PLEASE, don 't insult (
our intelligence further than this, because we know that you j are well aware that, in this particular location of this i borehole,the FLOOR of the dump is approx. 25 -30 feet deep...
and this Plutonium sample was retrieved from a depth of 92 feet at the interface of the bedrock !
I It appears that the second half of our letter of October 21 was basically ignored, aside from the rehashing of the " Fact Sheet" distributed in September. You will recall in our letter that we specifically requested the FURTHER analysis of the breakdown of the 21 filtered samples particulate matter, to learn exactly what the radioactive constituents WERE in l the Gross Alpha AND the Gross Beta. It has been very worrisome with regard to the way we have been distracted and diverted away from this information. We have been told that Ohio EPA's Hs. Corkran also requested this Beta breakdown l during your private meeting in September. Originally when I l l spoke to Dr. Broadway about this data on the phone, he said l that we weren't provided with the Beta because, " They didn't think that we 'd be interested in it,.that we only wanted the Alpha" information! Then, we were also told that this breakdown analysis DID take place on the Beta en the 21 filtered samples and that we would receive it. ( John Griggs was to have mailed it out weeks ago to us).
While we are supposed to be thrilled that the four rounds of testing (earlier reneged upon but now reinstated ) are to take place following an extremely wet summer of torrential rains - which are now supposed to tell the story on whether we have a " problem" with radiation or not, we will not rest until some specific concerns are at least addressed UP FRONT, rather than waiting until the summer of 1993, as you suggested. They are as follows:
- 1. Provide ALL the hard data to us as previously requested l
regarding the further breakdown analysis of both the Gross Alpha and Gross Beta of the 21 filtered samples taken from the monitoring wells at IEL that are located in all directions of this site - north, south, east, west and in
- between.
l l 2. Provide a commitment in writing from NAREL to do a thorough radioactive analysis of SOILS taken from various i
depths and directions in the quadrant of this site where the borehole discussed in this letter is located. Complete scans should be performed to include all Transuranics. ( Enough of this ridiculous speculation about space probes etc. DO the l proper scientific testing immediately.)
l
- 3. Come back into town / or release a press statement properly informing the citizens of the true facts regarding your findings thus far. Given the deadliness of Plutonium, 2 '
gq j0517-w~
W RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES April 14,1993 f Ms. Julie Corkran Division of Emergency and Remedial Response Ohio EPA 2110 E. Aurora Road Twinsburg, OII 44087-1969
Dear Ms. Corkran:
After comparing OEPA and NAREL data and methods for measuring gross a at l the IEL landfill, we have the following observations which may be helpful. Both l NAREL and OEPA's May 1992 measurements and particularly OEPA's August 1992 l measurements convince me that radioactive material;; exist at the IEL landfill and must l be accommodated in the remedial design.
The methods for measuring gross a in water by NAREL and OEPA, through TMA Eberline, are t!most identical. Both employ EPA method 900.0 for measuring gross a in water. At your suggestion, we spoke directly with staff at TMA Eberline.
The major difference is that NAREL filters the samples in the field (which can be subject to some uncertainty), then separately measures gross a for the filtrate and solute while TMA Eberline, the subcontractor for OEPA, measures the sample directly without
, filtering it beforehand. The OEPA and NAREL: results nevertheless appear to be comparable. If you look at the attached Table 1, well MW-27s, you'll note the State's results for May 1992 are 25 pCiA, compared to NAREL's 35.1 pCia. The NAREL results are obtained by adding the radioactivity in the filtrate divided by 3.8 (to convert one gallon to one liter) to the radioac:ive concentration in solute, as shown in Table 2. MW-275 is at least 200 feet off-site, on the other side of Cleveland Ave.
~
At the meeting, you and Dr. Broadway indicated that false positives may occur by not first filtering the samp'es. This seems to be somewhat of a red herring. You'll notc, for well MW-27s, that NAREL's solute reading is 33.6 pCia compared to OEPA's 25 pCi/i and that the filtrate accounts for iess than 4% of the above 35.1 pCi/l total. These results are generally ten times higher than background well measurements for Stark County.
Since, as you see from Table 1, NAREL and OEPA's results are comparable, we
- now have some confidence that OEPA's Augus; 1992 readings will be confirmed by _ _
NAREL. OEPA gross a measurements in MW-27S for August 1992 are 140 times Marvin Resnikoff,Ph.D.* Senior Associate 306 West 38th Street, Room 1508+New York,New York 10018* Telephone (212)629 5612
f Ms.Julie Corkrin Page 2
.- ~ _.__
_ ~ -o ,
)
background measurements for Stark County. Gross a measurements 140 times l background cannot be due to naturally occurring radioactivity, as the ATSDR health physicist also agreed. Since the deep wells, such as MW-27D, do not have high gross a levels, the high gross a concentrations in surface wells cannot be due to natural uranium i sources at the site. Some radioactive source must have been brought to the site.
I We are concerned about the excessive length of time for Region 5 and NAREL to l report radiation measurements. While we wait for NAREL to report their August 1992 I results, the design plans continue apace. If the design plans have to be amended when it is 60% or 90% complete, this'may mean considerable delay in remediating the site. Based on the present measurements by OEPA and NAREL, we are convinced that radioactivity exists on the site and that any remediation plans must take this into account.
As I mentioned at the March 10 meeting,in addition to measurements from monitoring wells, core samples should also be taken to. determine the nature of the i radioactive materials on the IEL site. If the source is a distributed source, few core samples are required. If the source of off-site radioactivity is one or many point sources, core sampling will be difficult, but not impossible since, based on recent court testimony end anecdotal information, one can limit the area ofinterest.
In the 19 years I have worked on radioactive waste and landfill issues, including considerable experience with the federa! EPA, I have never encountered this quite perplexing denial and attitude by Region 5. Generally the federal EPA is more flexible, but Region 5 is reluctantly backing into any adgission that radioacdvity exists on the site. Why?
I'd appreciate any comments you have and thank the OEPA for your cooperative approach to resolving problems at the IEL landfill.
p (',/ [ '-
cc: R Alvarez Best ,
C Borello 6
~ 'l7 arvin Resni off
/'~ ,,
l//
,. \
y
t M R:snikoff Notts Page Table 1. IEL Landfill Gross Alpha OEPA NAREL Groundwater Monitoring Aug 92 May 92 May 92 W ell (pCl/L) (pCl/L) (pCl/L)
BH-21S 225 MW 17S 143 . . I t.iW 17D 2 <2.7 -0.64 g MW 23S 193 3.54 MW-2' S"
~
, 4 63.24 t ~7E25S 118 26.2 Ryj(p@W#t94?MMrIM4W419M1MeRM9W35NB1 f.iW 270 <2 <2.7* 1.32 RW 42 <3.5 0.84 RW49 3.5 <3.5 1.67 <
' RW 52 5.1 9.11 I RW-84 2.1 0.48
- trit'um levels In 200,23D and 27D ato 1429,1421,1426 pCM re'Jo.
M R:snikoff Not:s Pago1 Table 2. IEL Landfill Gross Alpha 1 NAREL May 92 Solute +
Monitoring Groundwater Filtrate Filtrate Well (pCl/L) (pCl/ sample) (pCl/L) 1 MW-1S 0.49 4.27 1.61 M W 11 0.52 0.52 MW1D -0.93 1.00 -0.67 MW2D -0.86 1.60 -0.44 MW 3! 3.72 1.97 4.24 MW-3D 1.88 1.88 MW 4S 7.72 143.20 45.40 MW-5S -0.48 5.90 1.07 MW-6S 0.71 0.71 MW 7S 1.36 0.09 1.38 MW-71 0.71 0.39 0.81 MW 71D 1.43 0.04 1,44 MW 7D 1.96 1.38 2.32 MW-83 2.62 27.70 9.91 MW 81 0.76 0.42 -0.65 MW81 2.98 0.73 3.17 MW 8D 1.44 1,44 L
MW-8D 0.53 0.13 0.56 MW 9S -0.47 -0.47 MW91 -0.94 0.72 -0.75 MW9D 0.00 5.09 1.34 MW-10S 0.48 23.20 6.59 MW 101 0.68 1.78 1.15 MW-10D 2.47 2.47 MW 11S -0.24 27.20 6.92 M W 111 0.76 0.19 0.81
- MW-110 0.44 6.15 2.06 MW 121 3.46 27.90 10.80 MW-12D 1.20 34.40 10.25 MW-13S 3.82 8.88 6.16 MW 13SD 2.77 5.30 4.16 M W-131 2.15 0.28 2.22 MW-131D 1.23 0.37 1.33 MW-14S 1.19 40.80 11.93 MW 141 -0.52 1,43 0.14 MW-15S 0.51 3.66 1.47 MW 151 2.09 4.84 3.36 MW 161 0.55 2.81 1.29 MW 17D -0.64 0.64 MW 18S 0.27 0.27 M W 181 1.67 , 1.67 MW 19S 0.24 26.60 7.24
, m ,**'***}*
b l -
-- M.Ri's'n.ik:ff Not s Paga i MW 20S 0.24 0.34 0.33 MW 201 -0.47 0.44 -0.35
, M W 20lO 2.36 0.24 2.42 MW 20D -0.47 1.63 0.04 MW-21S 1.01 0.29 1.09 M W 211 0.45 34.00 9.40
.MW 221 - 1.42 0.58 1.57 M W 221D 0.71 0.31 0.79
. MW 23S 1.26 8.65 3.54 MW 231 0.98 0.66 1.15 MW-23D 6.34 4.84 7.61 MW 24S 60.00 12.30 63.24
- MW 241 0.84 1.45 1.22 MW-25S 26.20 26.20 MW 251 1.01 0.43 1.12 MW 26S 0.50 1.17 0.81 MW 26SD 1.06 0.62 1.22 MW 261 6.30 24.30 12.69 M W 271 1,71 0.37 1.81 .
, MW-27D 1.01 1.18 1.32 .
MW-28D 0.25 1.66 0.19 RW 42 0.77 0.26 0.84 RW46 1,68 0.05' 1.67 RW-52 8.34 2.91 9.11 RW 64 0.23 0.94 0.48
)
l I
- me.~.. _ m .
1 i
l l- -
.2, . . . . . . ._
.%...i C _- ,u. s C n ,... nes L2e raterf Mame; i '-
}
V
% i 5: net ! 6
- f (En -
Car:Sc2 tion Num:zr HT, .
(6n E x 35 ~3 r
- #~ / O 9 ; ' }-l
...s. '...o
"": ~ ..-.~.~:: .. S m::e Numce'- (52) .
Anasys: N> . I - l .:c: :u nr
- f. Ii o , % e ~. ' ( -
~ '7lC - Ca:e Fe:cr:ec:(27) g ^ 2 W / : (22) w Ci 8 Cate :ece:vec:
O '7 ~v -
i Samcle fcen:ificat:en he iuse u.uarv i;rnei / 1 Case t.:,nwe wour lg uonin ht"cla*v o Year l
[ / l / . c; O 3 gg. (q [ ( ,i % p s C, W y i nr Supply Name: (41) 43) H6
- rass.
, I A C1C C n G [26)
Sample Corrected sy: - ! M E ' /d N)
__ U n me t iM Sample /Well Location:
y.anty: & Zip: _-
b3M Phone:
emarks-Non Routine Anaiytical Reques:s ,
Accitional Information-Analyst l C NaCH I HNO 3 tid Tractment C C fcea CuSO, v H PO, C H SO. C Ctner(Exclain) a 24:i2 3
Na:OS 2 t I C Amscen i20$0
- !!r: :ra ~sce*naw.; ?* set.; Bss.C > s l C nrarre i244
- isticn T < e Chr:x.C Scectsr.5) #
l C Caresen i236 .
)
'ite i teent:nestion I C Carco uran i2759 l C C torcane
)
j,,ACIO ISOTOPE 5 (R AOS) oc/I ) *t- 12054 i2000
- 1 -icea. Tc:ai I C Csansz:ne i2454 I 4C40. l 2 -icna. Diss i C Cac:n's i2023 I4041 I 2 -40. a Futec .Q '3' O I C Osia:en i2222.
I4:C3 J I C i 2 C cremcetaane 'EOB) 62403 Eitts. Tcral 4 acas. i 2 f el Sizs i C 0 crcr :memare 1 129U i 404.3 t C Eca. sus:c i C 2 0 :::r-c.3.C. :crecr: care CEC. I I;.40 '
I t42'3 '
C E tr"am : 40 t : Once :s I:9a2 -f 1427- j
.-2 Cesactr. 2 <;275 i C i 2 0 c-': cc ::ane 12N1 Scen: j is:cm. 7 s;25e f 12002.
I 0.cus: '2003 y
a
- -e.isi #20;4 4 < 'f
-I Memssc . a !2021 ,3 8' ,e i C Erec:ran 32:05 i
a1 :ncra (225T E tex m.226 i c:3 _I 2 5 ac:em-i;5 i C E::cr:0r:nve-a I:234 t2004 -
2 :a:en.22- ta:T; 1 C % c. rzte 17.s5 2 -:rce:r;m.40 I C necir.:r cr ! 2CF 12 2 5:r:nte m.49 12:02.
! 2 -eeracr cr 5: rce i2022.
I 12 mexacr crc: ec::: entec:ene #2010 I
[2 Num i2C05 i 2 '..re:re $
~ ! me:nec Urar:vm tec:7 3
..2 .ranium-2:e I C Wr *! 82 0 i4CC3 _i
,'rst'4%20$ t C Maceo i o- t m. -
100? - _I
' ' ;. i n.,rn. 22 3 I v t a rc n c.-:ct 120 5 i C ' erciacmer 1222E ]
l 7:ilh ALMETH At4E5 t THM) ua/l :9a i C hn:acr: ore .-enes 12 4 a
l , 2 . :cre rm 12942 I C Faatser crewrocennre 82 D -
e-~ 2 Itemercrm 12943 I 2 Af?2'2tes (20:0 l f Er:r e::ce crevetrare f2944 I C F e-crarn f2037 f 2 Gioremcensorerreinar.e 12:5&
1 SYNTHETIC ORG ANIC CHEMICALS t2003 (SOC: uo/fii CC 5.ma::ne in: ram I2993 J
l 2 >. s #2:33 'C2C
-I i G To#uene '
E : :C3 t 223 '"
- e. r=w.n i C Tczacrere U 122
- 0 2 er r,.cewrne i G i 12 incriorceinane IUbi
--4 #"
l 10:55 'J .. . n
$ C TreffUr2Ho
' C -creiar-'":e e2005 i G ',vC '* l'MI
! aa::ates 30051 IX J /
2 ~4Acr'cr
)C240 I 9:a:1 i C 2 1 7 3.TC 0 0 #Dionini
' O ..cie tro a:vt t 2 2. - dN "i um
- e;::::sc %.:ence i
e ?ne -
m-= 1 -
l Il .: ::::: i i --
! i_ {
i ,
f
, l-. m.-.%
q -
~
~
t.-ri m - v- g -
.,e,
- 3,f , / i -
(5) Lacorsiory Re
-w
\
_ - .. . - (4) Owner or Purveyer et Water Sucoty Cistricuuen:
(*-01 Chio E? A. Division of Puebe Water Suppiy '
1 r- U .'! 0 i ev. 5 s 351 .3, i s n.. ,
munt
dnUO.ema m -%~ - . . :.
NQC((WM tEP A.~.7M.ENT OF HEA: 7H
- g JN C$ LAOCRATORIES Lsecrater/ Name: _ l i : rrr / 5:reet Car ;ficat:cn Numcer. (47)i I ' 2. 2 Y f_f (51) 3:x2563 . tsu
-:cs. CNo .:0255-CCE3 S mete Num::er (52) ff- .rW 'c M Er %.
Anatysc $b ~
IN .ionn :u ,,, e
.am -
M7'AeDate f ?.e:ccec:(27) D i'f. ?,S' /i(32) i , ei A""") Cate Receivec: O l Sample fder.cfication
.cne Use rMitary t;rno Sarnois Cate %nute cay Year wour I I (7) Monm IO* O) f I ' ! I
[()I 3 : a !() f G f / I [OfGe/ #$
er Supply Name: (M) M)
@ T*N W b -
(36) dl0 Kij k(46)K
%ss: Sample Collected By:
& zp: U MCohr a N -
Sample /Well Location:
bM (- K - Phone:
- nty:
AcditionalInformation-Analyst Remarks-Non Routine Analytical Requests C NaOH IHNO
-f TrCatment C Iced G Other(Explain)
C CuSO,+HPO, G H SO, 2 12452.
la30S 3 4.
I Amicen 120$0.
iart::a ivce <f aw R Pant # 04st.01 l C Atrarine l2434 i
iar*:n 2vce iC. 9ect-C. Soectar.51 I.
. I C Carcarvi 120 6
' b o'ntinestion I C Carcomran 12959 ADiC l'iOTOPES (R ADS) ec/l 14000 <9 i 6 orcare i2054 i
le 3. Tctai I C Cvanar:ne I2454
- i4040.
a.cna. Oiss i C Caconu 1203i iJ041 ict'a. Susca 4, LL 1 C Caiacon 12232 I4100
- 3ea. Totti I C f 2 0<oremceirane *E05l 12408 (4042. !
5 eta. Diss 12043 i cioromerretnane 12931
- Seta. Sus c 122'E i C i 2 Decrcrro.3.CP.sorecrecsneiCBCPt622:0 E srtum 140 i Oscarnca l2951 -
4270 _
~~"-
I C 12.Cicrcreerccane I2041 f tiurN 34 um-: 37 I a275.
i : Dinoseo E 0: - }
Ia254 12032 ~m O<cuar i2033** ~ .I
.c: m 3: I4022 /1 i Am ^
- Octassium-4C ! C frc;traa .m i2005.'~
- =acium-225 I a020.
I C 51cnn -* 12257 ^ *--
14030. rC~
. ac:em-225 i C foic'"oronvenn M2 1203' '>
14C04 2 :ac:n.222 I4174 i C Givenosate - . ' ' 12065 . )
. Sirennum. O I: meotac :cr it T- 12067 C
- l 14172.
2 S:rennum.49 #2102.
t : Hectaccior hexice 'i_ l2042. _ ,
I 2 'rfrum I4005.
I C nexacniorceve:ccentac ene 12010. o i Uncane l
'. Umcirne ':ranium #4C07 i 24u.
~
l
, ! Uranium-234 l 2 Linuron 12d56.
- t.;ransum-235 12008 ~4 'J l C Maneo 12015.
j i4C09 ;
Ursneum.233 I C Metroxvemer 12045 I J l TRIH ALMETH ANES iTHM) ue/l ;2943.
I C Metoracetor 12326.
' ! CP:creecrm i C Pentacr* ore recca s 2G8 12942.__- i 51.mcictm I C Pentacticronitrccente"e 12039 2943. i C ;ntnaiates
_: Srcerocscrnoromemane 12020 12944 I : p.e-! cram
__2 C.orcmoc icrometnane 12037 '
' SYNTHETIC ORG ANIC CHEMICALS (SOC) va/l 6 2 Simar:ne 12458
- 2038 2?Ahs i C Thrram 12991 122a3
- C3 I C Totuene 12020.
12228. j 1 : Texactiene 12985 l _2 Actcnm 122:0 C acreicniente I C t.12 7t:c-'orcemare 12055 12255 C acrirmies t C Trirlurann 12036.
l 12035 I C Yvcare i?105 2 at:ieases 12053 f2063 i 2 J.!)
- -l*crtor #2047 e I C 2 :.T 3 7003 iCics c, i21:0 = .
2 a:ciesto 2043.
~Z a:c'esro fuirenice t20a2 i : La 5 9 'Sveu%~ % T./!L t Z anc esro suitece s
t: 4sm 8 1 a: n
..' _M m tw i 3cqn t
I
=ao m .,,- v e r2 : : .
- I
. t .s ~ r .. y-,a
- . ' N ,. t w r oa - s *:
s (5) Lacorstory File
- A . ,, T. '; i ' r e r: o_
(4) Cwner or Purveyur et Water Supply (1.;) Chio EPA.Divesson of Puctic M *r Suppsy l estt:curien:
- J. S - F ev. 5,' 5 31 .o.
k m
tvom *Gh e' ti / ' " " * ^
E.xc.etlatS 2.0 oc,5CO. 0LWV6 opn-p;te, && tv.m l187 Excer s frorn a, h%a( Ryct reteam OROUND. WATER LEVELS 'AND Fi OW'NEAE THE'!NDUSTRIAL- ~
, 'ENCESS LANDFILL, UNIONTOWN, OHIO .
By E. Scott Bair and S. E. Norris.
Waste, Fraud and Abuse in nSmcT Federal Enviror1 mental Health Research Under an interagency contractual agreement with the Agency for Texic Substar.ces and Dise.ase Registration, the U.S. Geological Surv;y cvaluated geologic and hydrogeologic data available for the An Investigative Study by the Industrici Excess Landfill (IEL) site in Uniontown, Ohio. During Environmental Health Network prsvirus studies, ground-water contamination was detected in and the National Toxics Carnpaign Fund (b:3rvition wells installed at the site and in residential wells nier th9 site.
'One of the coo *spicuous casualtier kt the war agaunst toxic wastes ir the put WItsr levels recorded on del 11ers' logs from'279 wells wete reguntforpublic health officials. More often than anyone would like, fhatt ut<d to characterize the regional ground-water flow system in the concemed cstuens have recerned little sympatity, understanding. or help from
. Gr%s of the IEL site. On the basis of the gross 11thologic dif= state. orfederat health agencies. Instead. officialt have rned to minimi:e ps.
' tsrsncss between the unconsolidated glacial-drift materials and concern, often ierespectise of the situatiort Departments of public health ha
,h3 indurated bedrock, and the inferred differences in their hy- become depanments ofpublic reassurance.'
utulic properties, the flow system in the area of the IEL site was divided into two regional aquifers a shallow, unconfined - Dr Dswd 0:enest and tes L Boden j glacist-drift aquifer and a deeper, semiconfined bedrock aquifer. 8ma Unwsuy 5desat or Punhc Heshh Wu t 33 percent of the drillers' logs were from wells completed irwh and Consequencer Heskh Agency in chi glacial-drift aquifer, whereas 67 percent were from wells P. : so Enwonmemai Heash Problems' comp 1stsd in the bedrock aquifer.
A composite potentiometric-surf ace map of the glacial drif t r t w ifar shows that the IEL site appears to straddle a prominent AT5DR's relationship to the Environmental Protection Agency is an.
gound-witerridgethat trends northeast-southwest. Ground water serious impediment to AT3DR's abiliry to make decisions based on r
..p stortdia!!y away from this ridge, primarily to the northwest the southeast; as a result, flow in the glacial-dtift .
judgments, and to their credibility with the Public. Although ATSDR about _250 people. the entire ATSDR_ budget . current!y 3545 million ifar as the IEL site moves in a radial pattern away from the - ts drawn from'T7aTSU;5eifu'ad program..Each year, the budget 4t s.te in all diteetions. A composite, regional potentrometric- by ATSDR ts worked into EPA's overall Superfund budget, with Cor s':r t,s<w wp of the bedrock aquifer shows a similar elongated making the Gnal appropriation " ATSDR's budget is over 20 times :
Gt M + water ridge trending nottheast-southwest across the notth.
western corner of the IEL sitet however, it does not appear that than that aUocated by the Federal government to CDC.
-hv IEL site strad.11es the ground-water ric1ce in the bedrock b st.t ivmet ric s u r t t.e,*, Many observers believe that AUDR's budgetary ties to EPA deprive of the independence needed to properly do iu job. One of EPA's pt As a consequence of the radial-type of flow petteen in the chauenges at Superfund sites is to involve the responsible parties, sus i glacial-drifC aquifer at the IEL site, the direction of potential chemical companies, in a settlement. A'f3DR'malu21ior.s, in the e-off-site 3ovement of a contaminant would, in large part, depend on disagree with EPA's, may result in a cYaby ADDR for relocation o-ths original location of the contaminant at the IEL site. This additjonal_rytdlLTJtipti anct thus disrupt an impendt"nj settlement radial type of flow pattern stay explain the nonuniform distribu- increastng the costs to be collected from responsible parties.45 Wher tion of some of the contaminants detected in observation wells and ADDR was able to To7ce7 rehictant EPA to fouow up on its recommendations. EPA has sometimes apparently struck back bv pur a s e un t e sit impostng~constratnts on AT3DR's purse st.rines.
u . % m m. -
As a esnsequence of the radie.1-type of flow pattern in the Ohio Uniontown, a
An example raising this concern occurred in 1990. when AT3DR was instrumental m getting EPA to increase its Geld investiganon and mr
.acitt-drift aquifer at the IEL site (fig. 5), the directton of at the Industrial Excess LandGl! Superfund site in Uniontown. Ohio.
'rotsntial off-site movement of a centaminant would, in large part, j . had complained for ye.ars that not enough information existed about
? pend en the original location of the contaminant at the ICL . of groundwater at the landfill. and AT3DR responded by bringing in te. For example, if contaminant A were to intercept the water tale in the northwestern corner of the site, it would flow to the I
.[f Geological Survey team which etmtradicted earlier EPA (dnp Es importantiv, an AT3DR health sovisory warrung people that they we or-hwast away from the site, However, if contaminant B were t from migration of toxic landfill gases played a key role in ersuading i Atercipt the water table in the southern part of the site, it As a result of Y 8 g P .
o'.;1d flow to the southwest away from the site. AT5DR's involvement in Uniontown. however. apparently did not sit sis flow pattern, contaminant A would be found in the north. EPA. Chris BoreUo. a citizen leader in Unientown. recounts thai sh, estern part of the study area but not in the southwestern part, by A13DR's Barry Johnson in front of witnesses that ATSDR lost 5:
c ntestinant B would be found in the southwestern part of the i
.sdy area but not in the northwestern part. This radial type of in [ EPA] funding as r>unishment fg help a congressional hearing into tric matterf,ing Union
. low ptttsrn may explain the nonuniform distribution of some of
.hs etntesinants detected in observation and residential wells, yteticularly if specific contaminants were not disposed of
/g j eifer:1y across the site. It is highly unlikely that specific /\
s:ontarinants were disposed of uniformly across the site.
r b
l OMk0 S. COREN AND ASSOCIATEb RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS (REANALYSIS)
SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-12D w
PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill p0yYi pk NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9216 U
pp ug' COLLECTION DATE: August 27, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 w he . Dro MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 33 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 10.16 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 32 7.2 5.7 Gross Beta 34.7 3.44 2.8 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.024 0.56 1.1 Th-228 5.4 0.84 0.30 l Th-230 5.4 0.83 0.21 Th-232 5.3 0.81 0.16
- U-234 10.8 1.1 0.227
- U-235 0.461 0.214 0.213 i
- U-238 10.2 1.1 0.152 EERF Pu-01 ** Pu-238 0.272 0.193 0.296
- Pu-239 -0.026 0.067 0.269
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 3.10 0.183 --
Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 IELF 92.9213 (U) i IELF 92.9247 (Pu)
Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 IELF 92.9213 (U)
IELF 92.9247 (Pu)
Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X IELF 92.9220X IELF 92.9215X (U, Pu) 9-1 Cy55 ML (%
ypg cf e mt u L. a -s _ - q u so m e 6.m %u% sa.4 w sExp:
nm-
l S. COHEN AND ASSOCIAT:
RADIOANALYTICAL RESUL- O l
~ SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-23S Q) \
PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9238 p
C COLLECTION DATE: August 24, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 30 3,gIU
(
)
6y 00 MEDIA: Filter j NUMBER OF FILTERS: 13 '
SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 10.83 grams 20 COUNTING J ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 120 41 40 Gross Beta 93 20 23 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.79 0.44 0.40 Th-228 7.2 0.88 0.30 i Th-230 6.1 0.80 0.20 Th-232 7.0 0.86 0.19 U-234 8.1 0.85 0.15 U-235 0.42 0.18 0.17 U-238 7.1 0.79 0.17 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 -0.0093 0.018 0.18 Pu-239 -0.019 0.026 0.21
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 0 . ~6 7 7 0.0569 ---
Comments: The alpha spectroscopy analyses were performed on this sample at the request of EPA Region 5.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9251 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9252
, Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9240X l Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9250X l Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9253 l
- The radium-226 analyses were performed by NAREL personnel.
1 I 8
{ S t
S. COHEN AND ASSOCIATE >
i RADIOANALYTICAL RESULT SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-4S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Lanot1AA p 5 D
NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9192 l COLLECTION DATE: August 26, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 i[
l MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: NA SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT: 7.18 grams S T[(
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT:
fc0 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 55 48 73 Gross Beta 160 64 110 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.59 0.31 0.29 Th-228 6.88 0.656 0.20 Th-230 8.59 0.728 0.099 Th-232 5.5 0.58 0.099 U-234 8.5 1.7 0.67 U-235 0.73 0.51 0.67 U-238 6.0 1.4 0.61 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0.099 0.11 0.20 Pu-239 0.099 0.098 0.17
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 13.0 0.301 ---
Comments: Solid material was removed from the individual filters before weighing. The Ra-226 analysis has not been verified by the analyst.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9205 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9206 l Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9190X j Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9200X !
Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9207 i
- The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
9 g
l' S. COHEN AND ASSOCIATES RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-14S l PROJECT: Industrial Excess Lanort._
NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9220 COLLECTION DATE: September 1, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 l MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 53 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 34.24 grams 20 COUNTING ACT' 'ITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi.samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 38 12 10 Gross Beta 61 9.3 11 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.37 0.30 0.36 Th-228 13.0 1.17 0.25 Th-230 12.3 1.13 0.15 Th-232 11.2 1.08 0.13 U-234 18 2.2 0.57 U-235 0.61 0.36 0.21 U-238 19 2.3 0.21 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0 0 2.2 Pu-239 -0.17 0.19 1.4
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 5.12 0.224 ---
Comments: The plutonium chemical yield on this sample was less than 40%. There is insufficient sample to repeat this analysis. There was insufficient sample to repeat the Gross Beta analysis.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9220X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9230
- The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
13 1
0
I' l
S. COHEN AND ASSOCIATES RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS
~
SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-25S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NL.TEL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 99.9243 COLLECTION DATE: August 24, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 MEDIA: Filter NTMBER OF FILTERS: 9 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 5.02 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 51 21 21 Gross Beta 77 18 21 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.088 0.22 0.42 Th-228 3.1 0.52 0.19 Th-230 3.7 0.56 0.14 Th-232 2.9 0.50 0.16 U-234 2 .,3 0.43 0.18 U-235 0.061 0.074 0.14 U-238 2.2 0.41 0.12 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 -0.027 0.070 0.25 Pu-239 0.020 0.040 0.078
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 3:46 0.134 ---
Comments: The alpha spectroscopy analyses were performed on this sample at the request of EPA Region 5.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9251 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9252 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9240X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9250X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9253
- The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
l 13 @
l L
b l
S. COHEN AND ASSOCIATES RADICANALYTICAL RESULTS l
_ SAMPLE IL: IE-7-SD-12D l PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill l NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9216 COLLECTION DATE: August 27, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 33 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT: i 1
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 10.16 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 32 7.2 5.7 Gross Beta 34.7 3.44 2.8 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.024 0.56 1.1 Th-228 5.4 0.84 0.30 Th-230 5.4 0.83 0.21 Th-232 5.3 0.81 0.16 U-234 3.4 0.77 0.30 U-235 0.25 0.19 0.14 U-238 4.8 0.95 0.14 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 -0.010 0.10 0.34 Pu-239 0.10 0.13 0.24
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 3.10 0.183 Comments: The uranium and plutonium chemical yields on this sample were less than 40%.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9220X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9230 i
- The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel. J l
9 I
r S. COREN AND ASSOCIATES RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS l - SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-17S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill {
NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9224 j COLLECTION DATE: August 27, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 19 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT: )
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 10.07 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA l METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pt ./Samp) l EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 31 16 21 Gross Beta 120 13 9.8 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.053 0.20 0.45 !
l Th-228 5.2 0.78 0.33 Th-230 5.0 0.74 0.16 Th-232 5.4 0.78 0.081 U-234 3.7 0.45 0.091 U-235 0.12 0.076 0.078 U-238 3.7 0.45 0.12 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0.020 0.13 0.44 Pu-239 0.039 0.12 0.38
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 5.'18 0.235 ---
Comments: The plutonium chemical yield on this sample was less than 40%. The uranium chemical yield on this sample was greater than 104 % . The alpha spectroscopy analyses were performed on this sample at the request of EPA Region 5.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9220X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9230 The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
17
a S. COHEli AND ASSOCIATES RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS l
- SAMPLE ID : IE-7-SD-18S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9226 COLLECTION DATE: August 25, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 9 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 5.88 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA q METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 32 18 23 Gross Beta 75 17 20 EERF 00-07 Th-227 0.42 0.31 0.18 Th-228 3.4 0.68 0.41 Th-230 3.0 0.61 0.18 Th-232 2.7 0.57 0.16 U-234 3.4 0.65 0.24 U-235 0.11 0.11 0.19 U-238 3.3 0.64 0.19 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0.055 0.15 0.40 Pu-239 0 0 0.35
- EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 3.29 0.188 ---
Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9220X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9230 The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
19
i S. COHEN AND ASSOCIATES RADICANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-7-SD-14S (Laboratory Replicate)
PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.9220X COLLECTION DATE: September 1, 1992 D4 !E RECEIVED: November 23, 1992 MEDIA: Filter NUMBER OF FILTERS: 53 SAMPLE DRY WEIGHT:
SAMPLE WET WEIGHT: 34.24 grams 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 44 17 17 Gross Beta 78 19 27 EERF 00-07 Th-227 1.0 0.49 0.43 1
Th-228 12.7 1.12 0.22 Th-230 11.9 1.08 0.12 Th-232 11.1 1.04 0.067 U-234 19 2.2 0.49 l U-235 0.65 0.36 0.33 U-238 19 2.2 0.43 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0.23 0.86 2.3 Pu-239 -0.23 0.26 1.9
Comments: The plutonium chemical yield on this sample was less than 40%. There is insufficient sample to repeat the analysis. There was insufficient sample to repeat the l Gross Beta analysis. l QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.9228 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.9229 Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9210X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.9220X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.9230
- The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
L 24 i
e
l l
l S. COREN AND ASSOCIATES NATIONAL AIR AND RADIATION ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY 1504 AVENUE A MONTGOMERY ALABAMA 36116-2601
. l RADICANALYTICAL RESULTS
- I SAMPLE ID: IE-6-SD-4S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill, Region 5 NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF 92.4513 i COLLECTION DATE: May 7, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: May 19, 1992 MEDIA: Filter SAMPLE WEIGHT: 2.2795 grams NUMBER OF FILTERS: 13 20 COUNTING ACTIVITY ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/ sample) (pCi/ sample) (pCi/ sample) l EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 143.2 7.34 1.38 Gross Beta 358.4 8.40 1.91 NAREL 00-04 Th-227 -0.03 0.16 0.28 Th-228 0.36 0.25 0.34 Th-230 0.21 0.19 0.26 Th-232 0.13 0.12 0.13 U-234 0.99 0.19 0.06 U-235 0.02 0.03 0.06 U-238 0.45 0.13 0.06 Pu-238 'O.07 0.09 0.24 !
Pu-239 0.01 0.03 0.02 l NAREL Ra-05 Ra-226 0.42 0.10 Comments: The Gross Alpha activity is above the action limit for this analysis. The total alpha activity is 4.4 pCi/ sample. The sample has been re-analyzed to identify the source of the alpha activity. The total beta activity is 2.54 pCi/ sample.
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF 92.4419A Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF 92.4419B l Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.4420X Laboratory Duplicate IELF 92.4510X Reagent Blank RBLK 92.6293 l
l
F "
J' j(ugotg ce rour n.eQ 9,2P) b dou b } Niby s S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS
. . . . .t1 SAMPLE ID: IE-8-GW-07ID PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.01390 i COLLECTION DATE: December 2,1992 DATE RECEIVED: December 10,1992 ;
MEDIA: Water METHOD I RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2cr COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) l l
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 3.0 2.3 3.3 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 2.9 2.4 3.9 EPA 906.0 H-3 '490" 180 280 EERF C-01 C-14 0.66 1.8 3.0 ,
EPA 901.1 Cs-137 - - 4.9 Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.01399 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.01400 12boratory Replicate IELW93.01380X L2boratory Replicate IELW93.01390X Reagent Blank IELW93.01401 12
r
! S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-8-GW-OlS PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.01379 COLLECTION DATE: December 7,1992 DATE RECEIVED: December 10, 1992 MEDIA: Water METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 1.3 3.3 5.8 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 10 4.1 5.9 EPA 906.0 H-3 ' 440~ l80 280 EERF C-01 C-14 1.1 1.9 3.0 EPA 901.1 Cs-137 -- -- 4.3 Comments: I QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.01399 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.01400 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.01380X '
Laboratory Replicate IELW93.01390X Reagent Blank IELW93.01401 i
l 1
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-8-GW-071 PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.01389 COLLECTION DATE: December 2,1992 DATE RECEIVED: December 10, 1992 MEDIA: Water METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 0.12 1.8 3.7 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 6.0 2.6 3.6 EPA 906.0 H3 390 V* 180 280 EERF C-01 C-14 1.4 1.9 3.0 EPA 901.1 Cs-137 - - 4.2 l
1 m
Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.01399 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.01400 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.01380X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.01390X Reagent Blank IELW93.01401 l 11
I S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
l 1418 l-85 Parkway 1
Montgomery, AL 36106 i
RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS l
S AMPLE ID: IE-9-GW-26S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02494 COLLECTION DATE: March 8.1993 DATE RECEIVED: March 10.1993 l MEDIA: Water l l
l i METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA l (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 l Gross Alpha l 1.9 l 2.9 l 4.9 l )
l EPA 900.0 l Gross Beta 2.8 l 2.6 4.2 l EPA 906.0 H-3 390 V* 180 280 EERF C-01 C-14 0.10 1.9 3.1 4 EPA 901.1 Cs-137 --- ---
5.0 l
~
l l
i l l I Comments: -
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.02506 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02507 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02494X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02500X Reagent Blank IELW93.02508 3
S. CchSn & Associatas, Inc.
) 1418 l-85 Parkw y l Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-9-GW-17S LABORATORY REPLICATE PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02470X COLLECTION DATE: March 3.1993 DATE RECEIVED: March 10,1993 MEDIA: Water I METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2c COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) l EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 19 9.0 11 Gioss Beta 86.0 7.33 5.16 f EPA 900.0
! EPA 906.0 330 180 l 280 lH-3 EERF C-01 -1.5 2.0 l 3.4
EPA 901.1 Pb 212 3.3 5.5 - - -
EERF 00-07 7h 227 0.026 0.036 0.061 EERF 0047 Th 228 0.57 0.12 0.12 EERF 00-07 Th 230 0.023 0.021 0.027 EERF 00-07 Th-232 0.013 0.018 0.031 EERF 00-07 U-234 0.24 0.074 0.N5 .
EERF 00-07 0.N3 0.030 0.021 lU-235 i EERF 00-07 U-238 0.15 0.056 0.021 EERF Pu-01 Pu 238 0.0099 g 0.034 s 0.082 i
EERF Pu-01 Pu-239 -0.0066 \ 0.013 0.053 TERF Ra-N Ra-226 7.56 0.169 - - -
Comments:
QA/QC:
Matrix Spike IELW93.02489 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02490 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02470X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02480X Reagent Blank IELW93.02491
'The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
23
S. Cohsn & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkw:y M:ntg::m:ry, AL 36106 l RADIOANALYTICAL RESL1TS SAMPLE ID: IE-9-GW-17S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: LELW93.02470 COLLECTION DATE: March 3.1993 DATE RECEIVED: March 10.1993 MEDIA: Water
'x.
l METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 18 8.5 l 11 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 90.9 7.71 l 4.99 EPA 906 0 H-3 370 l 180 l 280 EERF C-01 lC-14 l 0.10 l 1.9 l 3.1 l l EPA 901.1 Cs-137 ---
l - - - 4.6 EPA 901.1 K-40 94 41 ---
l EERF 00-07 Th 227 0.022 0.029 0.042 EERF 00-07 Th-228 0.54 0.11 0.11 EERF 00-07 Th-230 0.019 0.021 0.030 EERF 00-07 Th-232 -0.0041 0.ON7 0.028 EERF 00-07 U-234 0.20 0.072 0.052 EERF 00-07 U-235 0.050 0.035 0.024 EERF 00-07 U-238 0.14 l 0.060 0.047 EERF Pu-01 Pu-238 0.011 l 0.023 l 0.054 EERF Pu-01 Pu-239 -0 0032 0.0045 0.036 TERF Ra-N Ra-226 6.70 0.157 ---
Comments:
QA/QC: , Matrix Spike IELW93.02489 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02490 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02470X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02480X Reagent Blank IELW93.02491
'The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
2
\
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-9-GW 081 PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02438 COLLECTION DATE: March 1,1993 DATE RECEIVED: March 10,1993 MEDIA: Water NETHOD RADIONtJCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 l Gross Alpha l 1.8 2.1 l- 3.4 l EPA 900.0 Gross Beta l 2.3 2.5 l 4.0 l EPA 906.0 H-3 340 180 280 EERF C-01 C-14 0.78 1.8 3.0 EPA 901.1 Cs 137 --- --- 5.1 Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.02443 Marnx Spike Duplicate IELW93.02444 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02430X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02440X 1 Reagent Blank IELW93.02445 l 16 I
1
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway j Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS ,
I S AMPLE ID: IE-9-GW-SODWC LABORATORY REPLICATE PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02500X )
COLLECTION DATE: March 9,1993 l DATE RECEIVED: March 10.1993 l MEDIA: Water l
METHOD f.ADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2c COUNTING ERROR .\lDA !
(pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 l Gross Alpha l 1.4 l 2.0 l 3.4 ! ,
EPA 900.0 l Gross Beta 2.6 l 2.8 l 4.5 EPA 906.0 H-3 350 180 280 l EERF C-01 C-14 -0.76 2.1 3.4 EPA 901.1 Cs-137 --- --- 5.2 l
l l l l \ l Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.02506 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02507 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02494X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02500X Reagent Blank IELW93.02508 18
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l 85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS l 1
S AMPLE ID: IE-9-GW-01S PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill )
NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02423 COLLECTION DATE: March 4,1993 l
DATE RECEIVED: March 10.1993 l MEDIA: Water METHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR .\lDA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L) f EPA 900.0 ! Gross Alpha 0.12 l 2.9 l 5.7 l l EPA 900.0 l Gross Beta 7.7 l 3.1 l 4.4 ;
EPA 906.0 lH-3 350 V ~ 180 l 280 EERF C-01 lC-14 0.60 1.8 l 3.0 EPA 901.1 lCs-137 --- ---
l 3.9 I
I J
l
! l :
l l
Comments:
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELW93.02443 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02444 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02430X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02440X Reagent Blank IELW93.02445 1
I l
l M/0 S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l 85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 g'j j(
['j ,
r RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS
. , if-e'jq gi SAMPLE ID: IE-8-SD-0,fS PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF93.01488 COLLECTION DATE: November 30, 1992 DATE RECEIVED: December 10, 1992 MEDIA: Filter METHOD RADIONUCIIDE ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) 46 h Gross Alpha 15 15 EPA 900.0 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 82.2 ,! 7.74 5.87
~
EERF 00-N Th-227 0.61 0.22 0.15 EERF 00-04 Th-228 4.1 0.45 0.33 EERF 00-04 Th 230 4.22 0.416 0.065 n-232 3.5 0.38 0.084 EERF 00-04 U-234 4.2 0.54 0.14 EERF 00-04 U-235 0.25 0.12 0.053 EERF 00-04 U-238 4.9 0.59 0.089 EERF 0044 Pu-238 0.N9 0.077 0.17 EERF PU-01 Pu 239 0.093 ', 0.088 0.15 EERF PU-01 TERF Ra44 Ra-226 6.37 , O.182 ---
Comments: '
QA/QC: Matrix Spike IELF93.01502 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF93.01503 Laboratory Replicate IELF93.01490X Laboratory Replicate IELF93.01500X Reagent Blank IELF93.01504 The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel. l 7 ,
1
r-S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: , IE-9-GW-09I PROJECT: Industrial Excess Landfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELW93.02441 COLLECTION DATE: March 3,1993 DATE RECEIVED: March 10.1993 MEDIA: Water NETHOD RADIONUCLIDE ACTIVT1Y 2a COUNTING ERROR N1DA (pCi/L) (pCi/L) (pCi/L)
EPA 900.0 l Gros! Alpha 2.1 l 2.0 l 3.0 l EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 0.27 l 2.6 l 4.6 EPA 906.0 H3 380 180 280 EERF C-01 C-14 0.47 1.8 3.0 EPA 901.1 Cs-137 --- --- 5.1 l l l l l l Comments:
QA/QC: Mardx Spike IELW93.02443 Matrix Spike Duplicate IELW93.02444 Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02430X Laboratory Replicate IELW93.02440X Reagent Blank IELW93.02445 19 I l
1 l
I l
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1418 l-85 Parkway Montgomery, AL 36106 RADIOANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID: IE-8-SD-10S PROJECT: Industrial Excess l2ndfill NAREL SAMPLE NUMBER: IELF93.01507 COLLECTION DATE: December 1,1992 DATE RECEIVED: December 10, 1992 MEDIA: Filter ACTIVITY 2a COUNTING ERROR MDA METHOD RADIONUCLIDE (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) (pCi/Samp) 5.1 4.9 EPA 900.0 Gross Alpha 15 26 4.2 4.2 EPA 900.0 Gross Beta 0.42 0.22 0.18 EERF 00-04 Th-227 1.1 0.32 0.38 EERF 0044 Th-228 0.94 0.22 0.10 EERF 00-04 Th-230 0.99 0.23 0.1I EERF 00-04 Th-232 1.5 0.31 0.13 EERF 0044 U-234 0.061 0.069 0 13 EERF 0044 U-235 1.5 0.31 0.098 EERF 0044 U-238
-0.034 0.084 0.27 EERF PU-01 Pu-238 0.013 0.13 EERF PU-01 Pu-239 -0.0067 1.88 0.0978 "EERF Ra-04 Ra-226 Comments:
Matrix Spike IELF93.01525 QA/QC:
Matrix Spike Duplicate IELF93.01526 12boratory Replicate IELF93.01507X l2boratory Replicate IELF93.01510X l
Laboratory Replicate IELF93.01515X l I2boratory Replicate IELF93.01520X Reagent Blank IELF93.01527 The radium-226 analysis was performed by NAREL personnel.
l 3
l 1
l l i L l
-i 4 ..
7 -
2 s - .-
=
=
= 2 L .
=
1 l I
- l 0 O .
0 S
. 9 S .
s y ..
e 1 y 3 s
t 4 r 4 r 2 o 2 o .
o # - g .
- g .
m e u m e ..
n r u t e u t i a x
d l a c C a r c _C i s O i r .
o r e .
k e m e r m 4 A '
C o A 0 1 W E0 0 1 E0 I .
2- M : O M:
A0 5 A0 /
N4 4 N4 + : D. .
C
/ 5 9: T L
9 5~0 9 -
0 1 3 -
O 1 t) -
4 0 1 s
O 4 0 0 ,
c.
2 9 E 2 9 1 .
'r C M / 9 M / .
O s
v A2 1 :
A2 1
/
kH a E/ n E/
T c T D2 i D2 + 1 f,.
O1 T 1 s R O1 t d m C L 1 h.
o O C e a d U ^
r P e d m t r T e S O l
a.
u El T e E o R p St L m r a St !
o Ec R m
a E c I e r. ar 5 0 p
/
1 T e ) ' i f. -
S l eg e C l n
il ,
X' l i/ O r D l l .
4 y o t 1 o i u,
3 b C cC s C t d m ).
A ep t A i e a s 5 e t l 5 e m r -
m i
t .
o t 1 m e u 1 i r o ., A.
c l i D s i Lm o /
e u NT e NT a 5 p
jL . .
=
e s O r S O nr 0 e C 1
~
T I & og M e I & i/ O r D
.R T l I T l N C e ti w c C e U At cC s .
N
=e I
n At R a s
i A, R a ep t l
FD t ,
=
FD s e u ,
e y 1 s 6 F
4 D f n F l e .,
- a. E a. 2 r S .
r - i t
- s. C T .
a A m l I u J .
S f i l
s A tt.
0 1 o c 1 1 3 : 3- t s .
i - e r -
y 3 .'
t 4 D u e D 4 t
S q m S l 2
N - I A - a h X 2 ri 2 - A m li
- u t
E E c i I
I l o c .
I i ,.
- 0 6 r; r I
9 6 7 p e .._
/ 7 y m 4 - -
E A J 1
/
E 4 4 1
l V2 1 9
I 1 9 5 5
e: D D I
gd I
\ ae E P v E L i L e
c P
M fl e A A R S S
4 7
2 D -
O 2 1 l L C - l i C 0 0 0 9 5 0 S 5
E 1 y 2 y C-4 r - r 5 # 2 o m o O - g u g C r m e i nt e
_ e ut x
d i a r a r cC o C A
O i f p
o r i k e l J r m C a
C o A 9 W
1 0 2 0 2 E0 E0 4 M : O M :
0 A0 - A0
_ 4 N3 N3
_ : w :
C 5 T 6 5 7,
/ 3 5 o
51 L 1 O 1 U 0 .
O 40 S 0 5 0 4 2 9 E 2 9 2 C M / R F /
a r
a A1 1 -
n C1 E/
1 O
/
r E/
_ o T D2 i D2 +
O1 O1 T 4 J
_ r R t
,o O C i d m C L 2 r P e d m e a d U _
.uo El R p T e St i
L m t
r r
a T e St S
E O
L m E c a 5 o / E c R a T e nr 0 p 1 T e S og C l e l
.2 l i/ 0. r D l n
_05 y o t 1 o i s C C
_ 7 b cC A ep t A d m e
o u s 2 e a
_o t
2 e 1 m t
D e
l u
s 1 m i
t r
r a
D
.cim l u NI l
e NT o /
.e s 0 r S O p 1
_M e l & T I & e C -
_ .R I l I T r D _
- w e
c n
C e At s l
A N
U C e At s ,
.N I R a l , R a t
~
, y 1 u
_F P l 4 s E a 2 , e ti C n - r S
_o A m -. l I
S u I f l l N D A U
._ 10 D o c s 3 O 3 t i '
5 - e r - s S -
._ 3 D p e D y 2 _
5 S y m S l -
- - T A - a m ._
X 2 2 n u
_ . O - - A a D E E -
n I I f r O o o ~ _
_ 0 f P 9 1 1 e i
/ 7 7 p l 4 - - y a
_ ,W 1 E E T C
_ / 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 9 9 5 5
_W # #
D
\
e: D I
/,
gd I r ae P v E E
' i L L e P P c M M
- e A A R S S
4
_ 7 2
9 -
0 2 2
2 1 l L
" I I 0 0 U E 4 5 S 0
8 y y 3 r
_ 1
- 3 r 0 # 2 o 0 o 0 - g 3 g
_ 5 r m e 2 e e ut - t
_ x a ia m a a r nC u C
_ p G o i
_ t r O k u o
@ r l h .
C o F 1 T 1 W 0 5 E0 0 -
C- E0 .
M : 0 M :
_ 5 A0 '- A0 .
_ 4 N4 ,
N4 4
_ : + : 3 C 9 T 6 9 .
/ 5 0 L 8 50 0 O
O 8 3
2 0
9 U
S E
0 0
3 0 2 9 +
< 1, ~
_ C H / 7 s U / R T r F2 T2 L 1 1 U 3_
a r E/ E/ S 0 .
D2 c D2 E I m -
s R O1 a n O1 R o
r U
P e C
d ng r i m a
C d
J u El I e o/ t r T e .
o P p 5t i i 5 r a St t L
m Ec t C 0 o / E c i a T e cp p i T e m n
5 l e 0 e C l i r
_ 1. l t t r o l L a n _
- t. y o ei o r 5 i _
_ b C Dm s C ng 0 A i t A o/ d m .
i s 4 e L l 4 e ii 0 e a u m 3,. ~
i t 1 m 1 tC t r _
, l l s i c p r a u NI e NT e o / .
s S O t p .
. 0 r e
3 ~
M e 1 5 T I & e C R l l I T D r o - -
w c l e l N C e
+
+ n At s A U At s .
N I R a i R a t
e 4 y 8 u t
P l 3 s
- i. E a 2 e ti C n - r S ee A m T u I I J
D F t 0 l t O 1 q n 1 e A U 1
3 o 3 s 3
- e t - t-
't
- W p u W y G g l G l f
- i P - e 0 x 2 2 n 3 l
2
- - A - .
u i E -
t l I 0 n t .
v' s
O e
i r
t Y :
5 e
/ ~/ 7 p a 4 - - u h
_h 1
/
E 4 /, E 4
l T
_ e2 1 1 V Y
_ Ml 1
S 5
- # i e D D gd I I ae P E nE
. L L
_ e P P
. t M M
. e A h % E
3
] ,j -
p 2
- 5 2
- iD
- 2 R R O 1 E E
>O - T A
T A
C 0 _
9 W W -
.C u3 y y u0 r r
. - # o o
- r. 50 r g
e g
e t
o5
. d e
m t
a ma u C t F J x r u C
- o. A O i i D
F t t -
a -
k i i t
0
=3 r r r o T T 0 W 0 0 1 E0 E0 2
0- M : M :
A0 A0 5 N0 N5 4 : :
U 2 3
/
O 1 8.
1 1 0 6 L C
O E
1 3
H5 0
9
/
7
/
+
1 3
H5 0
9
/
4
+
J
. T 0 5 0 3 ,
3 cTA nE T E/
D2 3
5 E/
D2 I F R O1 8 O1
, O O C 2 C ,
P e d d nTU El T e T e oO R p St St i
m E c T. E c T t a T e I I e L u P S U U
_ l - l l l S n l S i f
l D y o E i o E i.
- a. 5 b C 1 f C R ,
7 D d r 0 d r G s 2 e e e 3 e h e l
ao t 1 m t t 1 m t r
t i
l i r i i ticw u NT o l Nl o l s O O p ne p / L /
L e I & n/ n i I & n/ o i eM P T oi r C T oi r C mw c C e i C o C e i C o a At t p 0 s At t o C -
nJ t'
+
l R a r 0 t R a n O F o FD et 5 I FD ei. S i r- > t i " _ t i o em i 8 P em s =
v.n E Li e Di c
_ nt s C L r S L ' S T T En i
- 1 I ! I S 1 M l N
r 0 5 E 4 L' 0 i A U
_ o 1 8 . 5 i f - 5 - s 5 W J- W y l
s3 G ? R l o 5 2
- e 2
- a n
rX n,
'. - A tn E E
_ nR I ' m I f m
_ o )_ t " o e t
0 i i C 'I ? 2 r t 4 e p
t
/ 2 r i
2 i
? - y t - y r gW 1 E
4 l I E 4
! i 0? 1 1
]_. 1 I 9 9 pW e 5
D 5
D gd ! I .
a?
- F . E .
- c i I. ,. L .
- . P .
N IW 'vi i
4 A r
S
1 7
2 9 2 R 2 1 E R C - T E
_ 0 A T 9 W A E W b y y
C. r r 5 # o o g
- 0 5
x
- d r
r e
m a u
t C
e m a t
g e
_ b.t u C "
F A O i i
j t - -
0 k i t i ..
D C
r r r o T '
W C
1 0 T I _
1 E0 0 2- M: E0 _ -
A0 M:
3 N0 A0 .c 5
/
4 6
1 8
N0 1
p a
1 _
o 1.
1 3 ~.
u 1 0 5 1 0 6.
s 9 -
4 t
3 / 9 f e
/ 3 /
r H7 + H0 .
a 0 4 1 r E/ 3 E/
u T D2 9 D2 p
u R
O F e O1 C
d 3 O1 C
!,J s
u u
El R p m
T e St T e St d
2 S
a '
Ec I e l U T
L Ec I e 1
L C t l
S l U y o n l S l 7 .
- E i o E b C R C D R _ 7 .
s 1 e t
t r D r e e 2 e .
t 1 m t t m e .
l i 1 t m .
u NT r n
i NT i i s O L r
]
I ,
e I & n/ / O 1. /
1
.R e i I & n/
T oi r C I i
c C e iC p oi '
'n n At t p 0 s C e At i C p I
R a c 0 t t -1 0 4 _
FD et 5 R a r. 0 t i l
e FD et 5 P e i t i ,
__ 1 E Dt
- n. s e
em C L Di r S 1 $ S T ! .
l I .
J 1 l l
? ;
A l
U D t l
2 i t.
I i W y W
y s .
R l G l
- a ,
- a 2 n, 2 n E
- A ..
I 0 E .
m l r r 0
7 o n
,e i
i .
9 2 t t i
/ 5 o 3 e t .
4 - y t
5 p i .
1 E T 7
- y v
/ 4 E T 1 .
2 1 4
?1 ? 1 5 9 .
- 5 e- D .
gd I 0 :
ae 1 ..
F t -
E -
E t
L L
_ e P P c M e .4 .
R 9 9
e 2
5 1
J<
O 2
2 R
[ ,
- A.
1 7"
1 E
T C
f _
t 0 A ^
_ E I
I 9 W .
t L
) 2 y . ,-
C r b3
- o g
]\ t uM r e bC e t
- d m a e
x r u C m taA F O i u _
- t. t i n
1 0 k i t
+3 r r i o r J
C T W 0 T L 1
2- E0 M : E Q L 5 A5 M '
C 4 N4 A
N T u 6 i
/
O O
C 1
3 1
0 9
/
9 7
4 1 7 t
6 0 m-M s H3
/
3 -
T + H -
_. T A 0 9 /
E/ 9 4 f
. O T D2 9 E 2
.p R O1 D 4
, o O C m O 3 t F e d C 3 F u El I e 0 o R p St I 2
m E c T S s a I e L E T 2 S l tJ l L J
0 y l
o S
E i n
S n i
u b C E E s 4 D
e R
d r D R
~i y
rO e d o t 0 m e 5 e e t t 0 c l i t t n u NT r i r
$ s O o l N 2 e
e L p / 0 o 1 M I ?. t / e L p /
.R T oi r i 1 n/ e i w c C e C T oi r r n i C p C C At t p 0 r i C p N I R a c 0 A t P 0 =
FD e '; 5 t
l R e 0 E t i F rt 5
- F e i em i
- a. E s t 1 u _
Di e e7 r s t
i C L Di e A s
i i S l
' S a3 T T r l I 1 l i
, l J 0 s A
I 5
1 l
t r f
'. e 3
1 i
- 2 i A U e n W 9 W-
-- c _
G 1 u e
- s R- i s 2 t - %,
m n 2- .-- i ar E - A t I r m E_
l -
fe ir 3 m .
0 i r "
w s.
? 4 , t i t,e
/ 0 r i 6 a t w 3 - y 0 e +
i r e
_ 1
/
E 4
' T E 1 u
1 e
8' r
2 1 4-i w
61 7 1
=
q 5 9 f i
w 0-e g
ie e
_ w D
gd I 0 ee ae 1 f
e e
s, n?
E l E.
1 t
m
=
_ F
- u. M f i
o5, a
R E M 1
2
/
2 -
9 2' R _
R 0 1 E E 2, - T T O A A 2
Y W W
- 3 y y 9 r r 5
- o o g g 0 r e e C e t t
- d m a m a '
x r u C u C O
a r
O k
t i
i t
i i
u 3 r r r o 1 1 C W 0 0
1 E0 M :
E0 M :
0 J
A5 A6 3 N4 N5 4 : :
G 8 8
/ 0 3 0 Z \
O 8 B O 1 0 4 1 0 4
\
9 - 9 - \
C 3 / / 3 / /
a H2 + H2 +
Jt A
T T E/
D2 1 0 7 E/
1 3 9 \- [
s E T 6 D2 8 s
R O1 O1 e F i
r T
O O P e El C
T e d
C d
U T e .
uO R p m
St St G
s a
E c T e T
L E c T e T
L
't u _
u* S U U
\ _
l l
\ b s ;
e 1 l S n l S n _
l t.
y o E i o E i _
! b C R C R
/ D d r 0 d r .
e i
l s l e e e 2 e e e _
s s i e t
l l m t t 1 m t t _
i r i i r i b u u NT o l NT o l e -
e . s D L p / O L p /
s s M e ! h n/ e i I & n/ e i e
s R T o1 r C T oi r C s c C e i C p C e iC D _
e s 1
%. n At t p 0 s At t p 0 s I R a t 0 t R a c 0 t uF . FD et 5 l FD et 5 l e s , t i u ti u -
e i w
P E
em s em s _
e e s
- a. .
Di Di _
L .
L S r S o
t i r L .
T T Gu . I I I !
s
?
2 l N l t
r 0 0 s A U 4 s A U u 1 0 t 6 i _
a
- s - s t
s 'l
's B y, W y R
F s l l u'x 2
- a n 2
- a n
- a. l
- A - A -
. 8 1
i E E l r m l '+ m a ;
. u o o t
0 i 2
. I 9 1 e t 3 e t
/ 7 p i 7 p i 4 - 9 r - y r gW 1
/
E 4
1 T E l T 4
'c 1 1 9I 9 9
-W 5 5 e D D gd I I ae F v E E i L L
, , . e P P
., c M M e A A R S S
~
2 7
b 2
U 2 R R B 1 E E 2 - T T 0 A A t
l i
s
- 9 W W 3
- 0 y y I...
9- r r .
- o o 5
0 5
r e t g
e t
g e (
d m a m a d
x r u C u C a O i i [
F t t k i i O
r r r 3 o T T 0 W 0 E0 0
1 E0 2 M : M : i A2 A2 q
5 N3 N2 4
/
0 5 8 0
2 7
0 1
3 8 g 0 1 0 4 1 0 4 9 - 9 -
_8 3 / / 3 / /
H1 _ _
s H1 + +
r 1 0 1 7 c.a E/ 5 E/ 2 nov T~ D2 3 D2 G i :
,o nru s
R O
P e El O1 C
T e d
O1 C
T e d j_
o o R p St St s m E c T E c T t a T e L T e L u*
'2 S l U - l U s
s i; l S n l S n a
a t, y E i o E i
! b C R C R
- r. D . d r D d i
s 5 e e e 6 e e s e m 0m t t ai
, t 0 t t r -
l i r i i i c u NT o l NT o 1 s O p n .. O L p / L e /_
eM e I & n/ e 1 I & n/ t,
.R T oi r C T oi r mw .
c n
C e At iC t p 0 s D C e At iC t p 0 s f n l.
I R a c 0 t R a c 0 t or FD et 5 l FD et 5 l u
r.
, ti u t i l P em s em s
- v. E Di e D2 r
e S
n e. C L r S L T T
= l I l I r'o l N l N 2 s A U 8 s A U o I 4 i 4 i
_ r .
- s - s s 'I W y l,
W y
- i. R R l o* 2
- a n 2
- a n
rws - A - A tt i E E
_ ni I f m I f m o o u oi u e
0 i i ci
- 9 3 p
e t 4 e p
t
_ / 6 i 6 i 4 - y r - y r
_ m. 1 E T T E f 1 gw 61
/
2 4
1 9
4 1
9 5 5 v #
4W e gd D
I D
I ae
, P v E E i L L e P P c M M e A A R S S
4 7
2 0 -
0 2 l 2 1 L l
- I
' 0 0 O 5 9 S Q' 1 y 3 y C- 4 r 4 r 3 # 2 o 2 o g - g 0 -
r m e m e 5 e u t u t d i a i a x r c C c C a O i i c r r O k e e O r m m o A 4 A
- C W 0 1 0 1 1
E0 E0 0-5 4
M:
A0 N4 O
/
M :
A0 N4 9 ) -
- + :
5 9 T 9 9
/ 5 0 L 1 5 0 O 1 J t
. 3 O 4 0 S O 4 0 1
, l 2 9 E 2 9 1 C M /
a v
M A2
/ R A2 1
O
'rI
}
1 :
a n E/ / ,
.r E/
.e T D2 i D2 + t ,
R O1 t O1 T 1
.r d m C L 1 ' ,
o O C r P e d m t e a r T e d tJ S 0 bD l u El T e 2
[l
.o R p St Lm r a St E J m E c a S o / E c R >
c O p T e q1 ,
n a T e r r e
i S l eg C l -
- u. 9 l iI O r D l n b 0 y o t i a i m5 b C cC s C t d m A i ,
A ep t s 5 e t l 5 e m e a t 1 m e u 1 m i t r m '
D s i Lm r o mo c l i e NT a 5 o /
e w u NT nr 0 p a ie s O r S O og e C cM e I & T I & .
r D L
.R T l I T i/ O a N C e ti
- w c C e l A U cC s Ag n neN I n At R a s
i ,
At R a ep t l
FD s FD t e u m,F e. y 1 4 D s P l e
f
, n.
. E a 2 r S
- s. C n -
T c_ nt A m l I u
c.s f i l N i
o 1 o c 1 s A i ci 3 i 3 t s
.s D
- t p
r e D y 3 2
- .a S q m S l 4 i is A - a 2 , _
v
- I n
r xa 2 2
- A m uu E E u ns I I '+
o 1
c on .- 0 i
e ci 9 6 6 r; p e
/ 7 7
- 9 m 4 -
gw 1
/
E 4
E 4
' e 1
V 2 1 9
I 1 9 gw 5 -
5 -
g r
D e . D !
gd I -
,- ae E
- P v E _
i L L e P P c M M
, e A A -
R S S
T 4
7 _
2 eO -
iaC 2 1 L n2 - I l
i
- C 0 D 9 S 0 5
uL C 1 y 2 y
- 4 r - r tiO # 2 o m o uD r m e g u g e
a5 e u t i
n t
.x d i a r a
.A r c C o C iF O i f
,o r i k e l Q r m a C o A 9 C 1 W 0 2 0 E0 E0 M : O M :
X T A0 - A0 4 N3 / N3
- +
C 5 r 6 5
/ 51 O
O B
1 40 2 9 L
U S
E 3
0 5
0 5
2 1
0 9
4 2
a ~
a M / R F /
c.av v A1 E/
1
'n C1 E/
1 O
/
ir ne T R
D2 O1 t i D2 O1 T 4
+
,o O C i d m C L 2 J nru P e El T e d m i
e t r a
T e d U S 0 uz o R p St Lm r o St E L t m Ec a 5 o / Ec R u 2 a T e nr 0 p 1 T e S l og e C l G0 y l
o i/ 0 r D l o
n b u5 b C ti cC s C i
C7 A ep t A d m e
'a.x c. i l
t s 2 e 1 m i D t
e l
u s
2 1
e m
i t
r a
r g
0 ~
e i
t z u NT NT o /
t e s O r S O p 1 uM .R e I &
T l T
I I &
T r e C o - ;
mw i e c C e l N C e t n At s A U At s u.N I R a FD i
s
, R a FD t
~
e eF t
, y 1 l
u s P l 4 s w a t.
E a 2 e t i C n - r s EmS A u
m 1
l I
r o f i [ N o 1 D o c D s A U f 3 i 3 i 0 -
5 - e r - s 5 -
3 D p e D y 2 a'
c 5 S
- T y m A
S l
a m X _
2 2 n u
- - A i
'r O D E E~ n
. I I f r u O. o o ~ _
CP 0 9 1 1 e f
i
/ 7 7 p l 4 - - g a
[dm e 1 2 1
/
E 4
1 E
4 1
T C 1 1 9 9 5 5 T~M I e gd D
I D
I k.
\
ae P v E E
' i L L e P P c M M a e A A R S S
- t. - -
J-
- y - .
2 _
r 5 i\ " .
2 - _
2 R - _
R
'O 1 E E L
- C - T T C- 0 A A i- O 7 W W _ 1 i_
L t
O y y iC -
r o
r o
r O g g O r e e .
t t,
i C-x d
e r
m a u C t
ma u C t -
[-
i J _
- O i gb i
--
- t t t
o k i i a a r r r o I T C W 0 0 0-1 E0 M :
E0 M: n A0 A0 0 N0 N5 4
n G 2 . 3
/ 1 8 1 0 o 1 6 c 1 0 7 1 0 4 i
C 3 9
/ /
3/
9 '- ,
c ._
a 1 1 5 + H5 &
r 0 3 0 3 c
a E/ 3 E/ 3~ -
r T D2 3 D2 I
nep R O1 8 O1
, o O C 2 C t P e d d nr El T e T e o ou R p St St _
i m E c T_
Ec T _
t a T e I T e L ;
u P S l U l U l l S n' l S n i0 y o E i o E i
- s. 5 b C R C R 0
l 7
a t s
0 2
1 e
m f
t e
r t
r e 3 1
e m
h t
1
- i. t ao l i r i i v tw u Nl o 1_ NT i. u _
n-eu s
e l 0
&. n/
L p i
r
(
i_
O I &. n/
L p o
r u
c P i oi t C_
T oi m* t n
C e At i C t p 0 s o C e At iC t n 0 -
e.
ni.- - i R a t 0 t R a -
r 0 i ot l - D et 5 ! ,
FD e '. 5 t r- , t i em
?
t i e em i s P s' =
vi E Ei e Di c C L r S L s n.u.
T E.s . 1 I ' n r
I t l n
o 5 r t L' 0 i A u o i 8 : 5 i f - c s s W W l
s a- G ?
J*
R 1 9
S - e - 4, o
tn rx 2 n
2
- A n
E E no I ' m I F s
'r oo 0 t
i e 1 i
e C* ? 2 r- t 4 i r t
/ 2 t j
i 2 p i
? - i e - y r 1 E l 1 E I i
_ . 4 4 07
. Wb l 1 1 ? 9 5 5
_ "M1 e D D gd ! I ao
- F .
E E .
c i L .
, L .
- P e
u mW i W
r l
t l
l l
t r~
N 20 c'd m m
.: f.1 2U l
W W
& W O <
l D- 2 <
! .: id ~3:
l 2H w
'O G- -
w
- e*: o s-
!! I4t o JO 11 y c
m u a
e a m
,( -
u l f J e *U G G G W
-x s- :::3 C) :-) v l
~i 5 (
J E O .s
. .- s 4 at Q .anst .y-g
.y=.
- d
' n s-o 4
Wt 5- , "
LJ 3 >~~
r O O I'..
LaJ O L_
a E .. LAJ O E ..
-}
3;- <O mo F t ZO 2~ O 'La y U
.. j g
--s e 0 f e=O=e @, --*
.=l d
.--e i O I i"n --. O i e *~-
.O ICr- v' J Cr-1 ml% v r w Iltw
+;
m % f
> Os '-
) 4F e' .C I .-- O. ~
LLJ M W C:s wN ) D-L1J L
,.f i; Ct: O .-*l O Cza N O-
- D O U f Q- m o U -
.y uJ -e W- m e **'~
)* D Z " O# W e j \
E= LLJ u > W#
t ru e--- na J LLJ u
- m e {~~ --
J
- s. a c
CD =
e--e D
en c
- D - [
- 3,
.C:s C) o w Cr
- a C. 3 w
v: -
=
\,
y z m
a
- 'e = q :=3 C. l r -
4.m - j a si N m c. a;
,0 e . s. o us .,a, Eig c .u; s i t-W D ..-.
2& Z&
[-
m cu .O - o?i : s J
C.
s.
m s; O .
V c- *"l' s
d ,m a ~ c.:ti cN o h-= O* I W- -*3 ir u ' ,.3 Ot 6 V i.# .s= = '. S we U cd *) .e4 (,J
{ C;" <%" .4 > M C. O 0.s 4
C:: m V
,f GM & .;. C f 2
t cs --
C:: m e c.
gQ 0* I" .
- l w C::3 a. - n', =
aw : l l _
Cg as E nr
[ -~
Lt; o, i;,
6 6 V- ~
y v g,4 . c-d J ~ (n .
- , - C ;
,'; e --
i* ed a " -
o gr-e Z -
Z i,
4 "'. O ~-
Cd ~ -*
i..
e" ei sa 1- v I-(* it :*
- r C3::" ~
~El CD i -
i
$ F X l C .-
Cd. C N! '
'-.=
.a s :
w i <
C
~,
l i
E -
E i ;
e ;
j-1 : C O ,
z Cn N l. w :
W t e
c -
n* ;
nl l' ct -
Q O'*
I "
6.
.--* LtJ:
- 6- u.J , r N
- =::: ;
.--e-c:r ,
j
--*- y Ch* -r Chl @ ;
n' O 1
i
- 3*:! 4*: , 4 cr v - ---*
FTJ u.
' ,, x M,7 * * ;
o'=4
,, L.E e
,,,,,,,,I,
-/ h 1
- s. u. .e -
g O ,,
Q 'J . (I '
I ,
a
2 .
5 2
[s 1
D 2 1
O R ,
. M.
- t. S 1 E
T R
E C C- 0 A T ti S 9 W W A .
iO t ,
t y ,
C- r y -
53 # o r
- O g o - .
t r e g bC-e t e .
ix d
r ma u ma t .
oap s
- O i C
u C _
t i -
I
.O k
r i t _
O. o r i r ,
C T 1
W 0 T ] y>
E0 0 O 3- M : E0 ;-
0 A5 M:
N4 4 A5
- N3 1
- w G
6 : t
/
O 1
9 7
8 0 6 aI O
C 1 0 9 4 1 0 0 7 q t 3/ 9 sT H3 /
3/
1
+ H4 - -
cT .A E/
0 9 0 /
s 9 + _
e G T R
D2 9 E/ 2 I
s F O1 D2 4
,O O C O1 3 e
e T F e d C 3 n _
El 1 e d wU
.O R p St T e 0 2
m Ec T St _
aI e L E c T w S l
U 1 e
.2 l L ,
S l J I
. 0, y o E n l S'
l y
b C i o n R _
_ E D
(
i C R G s 4 e d r D
.o t 0 m e e 5 e d r c l t t 0m e o we u NT i
r i i t t_
s e s 0 o 1 NT r 3
1 V e 1 & i /L p / 0 o 1 I r e l r !
.R 1 oi r i
1 & n ',
e !
w c C e C T o1 n i C p C e r J
e At t p 0 r iC f.
r I R a :.
0 At t P O = J.
- FD e '; 5 t
R a r i r t _.
ti 1
FD et S l _
F em t _
E s t l u _.
ta Di e ei r s i C L Di
- u. i S . ,
T l ' S n I 1 I T o 0 ,
) 4 1
1 I I
1 1 t
- f. 'J 1 e l
r o I n - ; 2 i 3-i
- W 3 W
- s
-. C t ti
- 3 R l As 2 -
i - n. 2 ia t
s a E - e.
e I r m E I n i
0
'r !
i r .-
? 4 - t i
/ 0 p i 6 a t g 3 - ;
. r 0 n i au 1
E t T - u r
/ 4 E S 1
6R 1 4 s 9 1 5 9
- # 3
- t t '
a D gC I D e s: I m l.E. E.
1 e.
a.
- - i ..
c N
! W
~
_ ~
' 2 1
2 2 2 R R O 1 E E Sr - T T 0 A A
=
W W 9
S
+e y r
y r
s -
- o o s g g
-o
- r e
e t
e C t m a
- d m a u C x r u C a
r O
t i
t i
i o
o k i r
o r r c
i W
o 1 E0 0
T E0 0 y R M : M :
- A5 A6 _
a N4 N5 4 :
8 C
/
8 0 3 0 Z L _
B 0
o 1 0 4 1 0 4 g
s _
o 9 - 9 - _
c 3 / / 3 H2
/ / _
h5 a H2 + + _
v 1 0 1 5 _
. 9 c a E/ 7 E/ i D2 6 D2 8 nonr T I
, o R
O P e O1 C
d O1 C
d g ."
ntu El T e T e St i oo R p m
St Ec T E c T e T
L
\u t a T e L \ s S l J l U \
S n I
n \
S l un '.
l l l
a i;
y o E i o E i \
b C R C R D d r D d r t i s l e e e 2 e e e l
i t l m t t 1 m t t
- a. . l i r o
i NT i r o
i l
t . .
u NT l p
s O L p / O L /
- n. e I h n/ e i I &. n/ e r
i C
eiv .R T o1 r C T oi D C e iC D m.i c n
C e At i C t p 0 s At t p 0 s ni I R a i. 0 t R a t. 0 t or FD et 5 l FD et 5 l u
- r. . t i u t i i i P em s em s e
- v. E Di e Ds
- n. . ( .
L r S T
L I
r S T
I E.. l I N
2 l N l r.o 0 s A U 4 s A U o 0 t 6 t s
f i -
si B y, W y F l R l i .
a a o- = 2 n 2 A
n
.i - A -
u E E i l r m l f m e
- u o u 2
i 0 i 3 e
. i 9 1 e t p
t
/ 7 p i 7 i y r - y r 4 -
E l T gw 1
/
E 4
l T 4
1 2 1 9
y,w 9 9 1
5 D #
e D D I
gd I ae E F v E L l L P e P t M M
, e A A R S S
2 0
9 7
2 2
1 R
E R
E 3
2 - T T 9- 0 A A 4 W W 2 )
i8 y y ,
9 r r ,
- o o 5
0 r g
e t
g e (
5 e t
- d m a m a x r u C u C A r
a O i t
i [
L r t i
o k i B
r o T r T r )1 v C W 0 E0 0
1 E0 g 2 M : M :
A2 A2 5 N3 N2 q
,8 5
/
0 4
0 3
1 8
0 0
9
/
2 7
4
/
1 3
0 1
0 9
/
2_
8 4
/
w r
H1 + H1 + _
c.av u
r T
E/
D2 1 O D
3 E/
D2 1 7 2
G F
a nos R O1 O1 I
nru
,o O P e El C
T e d
C T e d 3 o H p St St ,
i o m E c T E c T A
t a T e L T e L u' S l U l U l l S n l S n l '-
y a E i o E i
- a. **
./
?
t b
s D
5 C
e R
d e
r e
D 6
C e
R d
e rn e
l I
t 0 m t t 0 m t t ai, l i r i i r i t u NT o 1 NT o 1 p / O L p /
n .- s O L e I & n/ e 1 e I &. n/ 1 eM .R T o1 r C T o1 r C D
D C e iC m* ,.
c n
C e At iC t p 0 s At t p 0 s n3 I R a t 0 t R a c 0 t or FD et 5 l FD et 5 l u t i u
- r. .
, t i em s em s i P v ,.
I E Di e D i a S r S na C L r T
L T
E l I l I N
l N l
_ r *o 2 s A U 8 s A U o I 4 i 4 i s
f - s -
W st W y ,
R l y
. R l l
a o* w 2
- a n 2 n
r a
- A - A ts E E ne i
I r m I f m o u o u o:e 0 i s Ct a 9 3 e t 4 e t p 6 p i
/ 6 i y r 4 - t s
r -
E E I 1 g 1
/ 4 7 1 4
1 2 1 9
61 9 5 5
W e gd a e D
I 1
D I
P v E E i L L e P P c M M e A A R S S
3 s 7 i 1 2 s
- i O 2 R l t
R O 1 E a E
- 2 - T n T C- 0 A A A 9 W W O
O l
5'f a y k
y C r r r 5
- o t o g c g 0 r e e e \
5
- d e t m a S p t a u x r u C C
- a O i a
- p t m m
d
- 0 k i 3 r r a o T G _
(0 W 0 0 1 E0 E0 0- M: M:
5 A7 A3 4
i N1 N2
- : r _
5 0 5 e
- / 1 2 1 1 t O
O 7 S 1 O 1 0 4 M 0 1 C 9 < M 9 /
3 / A / i s H2 G2 C r 1 1 p
_ c.ar E/ E/
nsr T D2 D2 S I R O1 O1 T O
.o nru P e El C
T e d
C T e d
I N
U 6
o R p St St s i
l t
u 2 o
S a
m E c T e l
l T
L U
S n
E c T e l
l i
l s
y n l
0 y o E i o a a
- a. 5 b C R C n 9 '
7 D d r B A .
8 s 1 e e e 2 e O l
ao t 0 m t t 0 m l -
l i r i i a /
tc ix u NT o l NT r +
ne s O L p / O t 0 e I & n/ e i I & c eM e en
.R T oi ' . C T 5 mw c C e iC D C e p T2 neN I n At R a t p c
0 0 t s At R a S L U
o.
re ,
FD et ti 5 l u
FD a m
S E
em n
iF P s m R va E Di L r e
S a
G ntn C T
Ea r S o
o 2 s l
l A
I N
U 4 5
n f 1 2 i 5 - s -
s3 W y W R l R o5 l
- a -
rX 2 n 2 tO - A - 0 E E 6 nB I f m I E-o u Dt
_ oO 0 i I l CP 9 7 e p
t 8 La
/ 7 i 7 Cb 4 - y r - Uo 1 E T T E NC W /
2 4
1 4
1 21 9 9
,m ' e :
5 D
5
~D
- /'
gd I I
_ ae
_ P vi E E
_ L L
_ e P P c M M e A A ~
R S S
d 4 s
a c
i s
p
! 9
' 2 2
h gE R
R 1
R 0
nT E C- A A T E
9 W A W
rs 1
- C gy
>C t r y
>- # t o r
.5
-0 s5 e r
c g e e o
g p t e
- d S a t
.x a 0 1
a C ma u uC
,j p
m i O t r
m t O a i a 9 r C W 0 T .
1 0- E0 0 s
M E0 5 A1 M : .
N0 4 :
r A1 N0 .a _
5 6 \ .
/ e :
0 1
S 1 t 6 1
.\d
\
M 0 i . ._ _. 7_
0 6_
p in l .
C f M 9 / _-
1 0 4 3 e
r A /
G3 O c i
o -
_. - H3 3 9
/
c.av E 0 I
nsn ~i R
DW Ol i.
T E/
D2
_ l
' i
,o O C I
- _ _ O1 _
nru P e d N _. C El T e d o o R p St s U _- _ T e i
t m Ec i St t a T e s E c T l
u 2 S l y T e L l
0 y l l l U o5 o a l S n b C n .- o E P70 8 A i .
C R i
i s o.
t s 3 0
e m 6 - D 3 e h e
r e
0 l
t K.
l u
i a 1
0 m t t n=e NT r ': . i r
s O t t NT o i
eM e I& c 6 0 L p l
/
.R T e e
1 n/ e mw c C e p 1 oi i
neN I n At R a S
T 6 L2 C e At iC t p r c p .
o U 0 s _
rs FD a S _- R a c 0 t
_J _
FD s
et iF va E h m m
E R . _
t i 5 l u
nt C a _ _
em s L
i G Di e Ea r
- L r S r S T f
o o
1 3
1 3 s I
l A
I N AO-5 -
1 s U
s3 W -
W
- s l
R y o 5 4 D
- 5 R l r X. 2 ,
- a tO -
a . 2 n nG E s _ - A l
Es E oO 0 Dr I f r t
CP 9 3 I a L 9 o
i o _
/ 0 C o_ . 3 e t 3 - Ut
. 0 p i Ntu j' E ---- - -
W /
1 4 - E y
T r
T 2 1 4
_ 51 9 1 AO ,r gW r e 5
D x
,X.
5 9
gd I D ae I P v E i L E e P L c M P e A M R S A S
I i
3 5
3
>O -
-G 2 i
l L
'- E 1
- l I -
d- 0 0 O -
e 2 7 5 S -
oC y 8 y
-C - 0 r 3 r 3 # 1 o 2 o
- g r3 r
2
- e g
m e
-5 e mt u t x
d ua i a a r i C n C p O n o o o t k l u 3 r o l C o P P 8 1 W E 6
C- E M M O 5 A A -
4 N N /
+
C T 8
/ 5 5 L 9 O
O 00 5 9
8 3
2 0
9 U
S E
O 3, ~
C l 9 s u/ . V / R T P4 0 P4 1
cT.A E/
1
/
E/
nsF T R
D2 O1 T 5
+ D2 O1 a m
n I
,o U C L 3' C nq r i m a
J nru R e El l d
e S U
1 T e d
o/ t t -
a i
oo R p m
St E c E
P St E c i 1 t C 5
0 r
o / L t a T e T e c p p i u* S l l e O e C l
l M l i
r l t t r p at y o i o ei S b C C Dm s m y A d m A i t e a_ e L l
~
s 1 e 1 _
Q 5
u l
a., t 9 m t r 0 m s.
r a i t
n-i e
e l
u s
Nh 0
o p
/
i NT O
t r
5 _
e I & T eM R e 1 I
r C
D T I 1 - - _
mw a c C e C e l A
4 f
U n.N !
P At R a t s At R a !
- r. .
- u y 8 2
I P r l
- v. E e s 2
- n. ' - T E A
i r
m E.9 T u l I J f i r o l t o n
- c. A U I o i i - a f i i t 3 e t l
se :
D 1 j.
0 D
- p y 1 e
o! S a 1 S T P -
r s i
- n 2
2 t i 2 '
n n
i E
- v E oi I : i I
- m 0 n Ci -
? o
/ 5 ; i 6 8 7 ., e /
1 E ' :
3 E
/ 4 4 1
2 1
_ 31 9 9 PbM ,
e gd se 5
D I
5 D
F . E E L L e P P M
o R
c e e B S A
7
~
3 5
3
.Q 2
.M 1
L I
L I
- 0 D a O E 9 S t S
,G
, e y B y -
C- r / r
,5 # 2 o a o 0 3 g h g
.5- r 2 e p e .
e - t l t
.x d m a A a A
r u C C F O i s O n s k a o Q r r r ,
C o U G 1 4 1 W _
2- E E 5 0 5
M A
M A
1 2
4 N N / /
5 + +
/ 2 1 5 -
O T 4 6 O 2 0 5 S 0 L 2 2 C
s t
3 2
U4 9
/
9 O
B A4 9
/
U S
E 2 9 D ~
r u.av E/
1
/
E/
1 R n
. s T D2 + D2 . m
.r R O1 T 5 O1 a
., r o O C L 9 C g d r P e d U d n/ e a.
.u El T e 5 T e oi t / J
.u o R p St E St i C r i m 1_
E c R E c t p 3 1 o C _
P S a i e l
T e l
c et G O p
e D L _
.O l n l ti r .
o y o i o em -
- 3 b
A C
d m A C Di L t s A .
F s l e e a 2 e l c c o t O m m t r 0 m u l i a r a i ;
oi
.x
.e u
s O NT ng r
p o
i
/ NT O
o r S Q ~
= M e I & o/ e C I & T T
.w c
.R C e ii tC 5
0 r p T C e l
l I
N
.o n At t p s At s A U~ -
e oN I R a e O t R a i n FD l t l FD s
= I
, ei u y -
et P Dm s l ~
o t
- i. E i e a a c i C L r S n h a.
eeGn ?
l T
I A
l p
'e. A c0 l N e f A i T
e1 1 5 A U k o o - 1 i - s 5 3 t- p ,- s s s4.
o
- y S p o o D i y r r e *5 S a ;; x T G G o n. - t i
s 3 i et 2 e 2 r -
ct - -
t o I E I n a e1 1 I
- u M -
e** 0 l 9 e r
/ 6 p a 6
,W 8
1
/
7 E
4 T
y
'r p.
4 2 l 1 41 ? 9 gh
, 5 5
e D D gd I 1 -
4 ae
,, P v E E i L L e P P c M M M e A A
, R S 5
~
4 7
2
- 0 -
i 2- 2 H' 2 1 l L
- - l I 0 0 D
- 1. F 9 S S HC 2 1 y 3 y 4 r 4 r e
i M # 2 o 2 o
- g - g 0 m e a
' 5 r m e e u t u t x d i a i a
. aF r c C c C O i i O
r r k e e
.Q r m m .'
C o A 1 A '
1 W 0 5 0 j 0 E0 .
E0 3
4 5
- M A0 N4 9
T 0
/
+
6 M :
A0 N4 9:
D %
O O
/ 50 1
4 0 L
U S
8 0
5 3
4 0
0 3 4 .
C 2 9 E 2 9 4 j G
M / R M / .
. T A2 A2 O 1 1 -
A cT nC T E/
D2 i
r t
E/
D2
/
+ L O1 -
I F R t O1 T 2
, O O C I. d tj C L 6 A
r nTU P e d 9 e a d U ,
El T e 2 t r T e S 0 oO R p St Lm r c St E m
i t Ec a 5 o / E c P l
u 2 S a T e l
nv oq 0 p e C_
1 T e l 3, - o l i / O r D n o.0 l l y o t i o i b c C s C t H
l E s 4.C 4 e t ep t l
A 4 e i
m d
e m
a _
aoc t iw nn t
l u
s 1 m NT O
i D e u s
e r S 1
NT O
m i
i Lm nr a 5 0
t p
r o /
i q
r x
eM R e I & T I & og . e C T l I T i/ O r p mw c C e l N C e t i n oN n At s. A U At cC ep s A _
o I R a i R a t r e
- FD s FD t l l a 7 . y 1 e u 1
P l 4 D s Ma 0
t i
E C
a 2
- r e
5 3 w m - m T C : u l !
PC H t D f i D l r D O I o c 1 ! A U dI 3 3 O i i Q
D ,
F.
- I h j
s p
y
- r e
m W
G l
s y '
o
@? T A - ,a P Pw
(
G11 D G i t
Q E
2 E
- i n
u D i I l r o
i L
c f.
- 't 0 s 9 5 6 r
- / 7 7 p e .
- - g r 1 E E I f i
C,4
/ 3 4 a 2 l 1 l 1 f 5
(
Y O
- e 0 D gd 1 1 ae
'- i E E r L L e P P
- . M M
. e A A
. R S S
4 7
2 9 -
' % 2
'% 1 L L
- I I
"- 0 D D 2 9 S S
" 8 y y 9- r 0 r
' 5 # o 1 o 7 g 2 g
' 0 e 5 r 4 e -
e 2 t m t
' x d - a u a a r m C i C r O u n 0
i o k r l D r u o !
C o C P l W 0 0 2'- E0 E0 '
M: M :
5 A0 A0 4 N4 N4 5 9 9
/ 5 0 5 0 0 7 0 3 8
a 4
2 M
C2 0
9
/
3 4
O 0
1 0
P2 0
9
/
4 O
[ o
- T A 1 - 1 -
- F T
M T R
E/
D2 O1 T 2
/
+
E/
D2 O1 T
/
2
+ G
- O O C L 6 C L 6 U U
" O T
U P e El T e d
S O T e d
S '_
R p St E St E _
m E c R E c R O_
~
" -P S a i e l +
T e l
L
- 1 l n l n
"' y o i o a b C C
- A d m A d m l
- H s 4 e e a 4 e e a
" oc t 1 m t v 1 m t r a
" ix e
l u
s NT 0
i r o
p i
/
q NT O
i t o
p
/
i o
~M e 1 & e C I & e C
.R 1 r D T r p w c C e C e e n At s At s ~ _
" .e N I R a FD t
l R a FD t
l ,
- , u u
- F s s ~
P e
- n. E e t
i C r S '
5 u T
" H s
I l
i l l i
D l N D l t
- O 1 s A U I a A U 1
3 i 3 t 3 - s - s
- l'
- W y W y i
G t G l 0
- 4 - a.
1 2 , 7 2 r ?
' ex 1
- i - A r. - A ~
t E R E m I
l + I f u
' o m o i "tI '
0 9 5 e i u
5 e p
n o
/ 7 p r 7 1 4 - y u - y e 1 E T C E l D OW / 4 4 s b2 1 1 I 1 9 9 <
b em e g0 as 5
D I
/
D I
F e E E l L L e P P c M M e A A R S S
OriginO. 1 Pu Vam_, ,
7._
- 239 Pu 238 Pu ._ pCi/1 438 Pu pCi/li20 pCi/1 Sample pCi/1*2O N 0.008 NAREL . Type & ID ID 0.030i Filter 0.011 0.007
.IELF IE-1-BS-6-75D 91.6631 BH6 0.0451
- 0.018 0.005 Filter IELF IE-1-BS-6-65 91.6638 BH6 0.012i 0.010 Filter IELF IE-1-BS-9-49.5 f 91.6961 BH9 i
Container 0.005
] I,abel [ [
.i IE-1-IS-9-49.5 0.021t ll Filter 0.010 /
0.003 L IELF IE-1-BS-10-55 -
91.7075 BH10 0.010i 0.007 0.015 Filter IELF IE-1-BS-FB-02 91.7458 0.0281 0.025 0.010 Water IELW IE-1-1S-08A-45 0.016i 0.011 91.7465 0.012 0.007 pCi/gwet Filter 85 0.081* pCi/gwet IELF IE-1-BS-08A 0.013 91.7470 0.014i 0.027 Soil 0.013 pCi/gwet 0.008 pCi/gdry q l
IELF pCi/gwet 0.096i pCi/gdry IE-1-BS-21-92 0.016i 0.027 l 92.579 0.013 pCi/gdry l pCi/gdry i see
- see attachment l
Tracer Blank attachment for Tracer TBLK for Tracer Blank Blank Results
.l Results
! see i
see attachment Reagent Blank attachment for RBLK for Reagent Blank
_ . . .Results Reagent Blank
_Results
___. I
/
p l ATTACHMENT 6 IEL Repeat Pu Vaules l
239 Pu MDA MDA MAREL ID Sample 238 Pu 239 Pu
! pC1/1120 pCi/1120 238 Pu
' Type & ID pC1/1 pCi/1 0.073to.275 0.752 IELF Filter 91.6631 IE-1-Bs-6
-75D BH6 0.129t0.357 0.936 IELF Filter 91.6638 IE-1-BS-6-65 BE6 0.030ko.193 0.672 l IELF Filter 91.6961 IE-1-BS-9
-49.5 l ma-9 Container Label
.TE-1-IS- 9
-49.5 i
Filter, 3.87 l IELF 917075 IE-1-BS-10 ND
-55 BH10 0.210t2.427 7.06 l IELF Filter 91.7458 IE-1-BS-TB
-02 IRIK Water Not 91.7465 IE-1-15-08 enough A-45 sample to ;
repeat 1,19to.443 10.8 IELF' Filter 91.7470 IE-1-BS-08 A-85 IELS Soil 0.011 92.579 IE-1-BS-21-92 0.022 pCi/gwet (A) 0.003t0.009 0.006t0.007 pC1/gwet pCigwet pC1/gwet 0.013 0.007t0.008 0.025 pCi/gdry 0.004to.011 pC1/gdry pC1/gdry pC1/gdry 0.022 0.006t0.010 0.009t0.011 0.021 pC1/gwet (B) pC1/gwet pC1/gwet pC1/gwet 0.026 0.007ko.012 0.011to.014 0.025 pCi/ gary pC1/gdry pC1/gdry pCi/gdry 0.014 l ND pC1/gwet 0.006t0.007 0.030 pCi/qwet I (C) pC1/gwet ND pC1/gdry pCi/gwet 0.016 0.007t0.009 0.035 pC1/gdry f
PC1/gdry pCi/qdry 0.004t0.008 0.025 0.020 TBLK Tracer Blank ND pCi/ sample for IELS pC1/ sample pC1/ sample pci/ sample 92.579 7.30 4.60 RELK Reagent Blank ND ND pC1/smple pC1/ sample for IEII pC1/ sample pci/ sample 92.57' 0.030 0.025 TBLK Tracer Blank O.003t0.012 ND PC1/ sample for Repeat pC1/ sample pCi/ sample pC1/ sample samples NL 0.0005t0.000 -0.005 -0.004 RELK Res9n t blank 6 pC1/ sample pC1/ sample i
for repeat pC1/ sample l
Sample pC1/ sample
IIbodori% dd J Atavoutsoue casosarony
- UsTOMEA BETZ LABORATORIES. INC.
A / 5 1 Il m - - 2 E
.TTENTION ADO 6 DSS SUSAN OVERBECK 9669 GROGANS MILL RD. }_3ce fi k o i E Sri C.
N w.o o o "M b .P. M E .+. YS S l
J 7"
?.N*
Gar.mn,.dW d j 88ft1 ~
S EM,,d.$8E%,f,.va*
nam = w @ .-:-m,N. =.9 w 2 2di P M ? "0#9780,t;,; m w.:Ji,4 w- l5.6 w09/01/92 egPym
.i@.Y6 u ssis" % m ad,Jf. a.=.m..AEE.liCSn?"Ehn 4guenwn'onocnia=eG9=~~ s swus ascrivto C0RRECTED REPORT "ustomer Date Type of Total Volume identification Collected Analysis _(mil,,, DEifl _
DCi/gl l
l i
08/25/92 Gross Alpha 3998 419 153 C3827500 Gross Beta 355274
- Cs137 <14
.K40 <239
<0.33 H3 of um: born /dd f f-W . L' iY /~0/i[
h/J NMikr/t:0 lLef lJ fdC<L
\
/;,'/:3 / / tl l f t' G lk/s Ox f, klr 3ctyx, I
'*' G 'I
~
C r etu ct I'G*l Ch4C
- f. i. , iii'f/li,LYEf Jo!IS OF h'?30 5 ,I/% a fIE,/ i ll G1 f ks/I
< pas,) /// Sbk- lJ C0[ !d M f' hoc /,1!
,f ld-d
.. . . . . . . . - - ..~n.-. "^oe '
'C
.- .:7 . : . . .
): REPORTED VIA TELEPHONE Or^x aIViA Eberline Cliff Gravel, Data Analyst ca Thermo Analyticallnc. ..ove m ir?l PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y. N.E.
AL 3UQUEROUE NEW MEXICO 87109
- ><oNt tsos) 345 346 r 57
,,(lh p//' k ?
l
. . . ~ . . . . - . .
i
......- .... eve-;os,
' ~W AR . BET 2 LABORATORIES, INC. O'" " ' I t 3
! " O
.& ~'
N SUSAN OVERBECK g 3 j/ m . ,- -
'M'333 9669 GROGANS M1LL RD. U ;. .1-r,- ..
l CITY THE WOODLANDS. TX 77380 S owY b (* 7 W' w.o. NO. "~ 'O '
92-09-025 0 -
O0:
m 0- +l- _YS S Ja.er.-Gross Alpha /Be ta..- r. .
..: r .. .- af . . n.-r n, .: . :- ..
~a ssa2 Tritium,".'.;: 1- 09/01/92
- YTe CF ANALY345.,3, .. _ ,, . ,. .
-Ti.f.N
.. A
- g: ,.i' .'.}
,,,,*3b . ,
? ...' c. !.7. I 'c '. ' PO# 9780 7 ':72EG7.UQY-
.w..*e,
' ,*-r. ,7
- CV570MER OmotR NUM8 EN.q. ; .,, s,- ;, SAu'Lis REClivt0
.:r.omer Date Type of Total Volume
- entification Collected Analysis (21) pCi/1. pCi/ml i C0826500 08/24/32 Gross Alpha 3949 193:75 Gross Beta 210:':55 * ,
Cs137 <14 i K40 <'24 4 H3 <0.34 il i
t 1
I I O l l
h(, . -
\' !
l l
s, /
5 9
)*e f
/
., f )
i v,
n s,,tb- .
. 8 ,-
n-l h) .
, r'
)
., N ' ~
~
m i.,
- s. .
t
= Samples being analyzed for c:ron:ium 90 and po:accium 60 en verk-erdei icG-102-101.
-
- M- c-
-'85*C.9750vtATE Es-CNE
. l_!8AX
- i. s AA Ebertine hen'no isnalytiC2l Inc. '
. . u . ' I: ! ....
u t.s.,;
. .. . . . ....i met.
.ye. -
- PA N A M E.c iCA A' f
- E EwA Y. t.', E. . '
.j'*%'!ROu!. N!w MExtCC Z71:S f.- / L
' rl . ,. '.gy.i,olf r / *- '- " " '-
-:n!'!C5:it!Jes:
A t.. - t .. w. a ca ~ : e c
- .couac gg7 LABORATOR1ES, 1NC.
'D /W "DO A
~*
ATTE NTION SUSAN OVERBECK
- ' " - Y' *
- ADDRESS 9669 GROGANS MILL RD. La rM 4.f-CITY THE WOODLANDS. T,N 77380 f(sdc. b. d Y\r.
- 0 "O* 92-09-025 k - --
1 bater.-Gross Alpha /Seta,. --
G Ad$a7 7'-itidm "-
ng or a nym...
'. '. '. ~
PC*97807 .. _ . l ~j
. . cxcwta oacta avussa ; . ... . . sau*.ss ases vsc 09/01/92 Certomer Date Type of Tot.al Volunie Collected Analysis (gi)
P,- ; .f.; F f.gjc.i
_ic.eft
..,t,ific.ation C0826502 08/24/92 Gross Alpha 3904 116t46 Gross bea 66:39 +
Cs137 <15 K40 <400 H3 <0.33 i
q
- . t
- " .f*~~ -
. - . W
\ '*
,/ .-
r.
w ,
, 1
.- .i .y '
. ..r I
i l
1 1
I l
r Samples being anclyzed for stron:iu: 90 cnd po:ccciun c0 en wen.crdet F90-101101.
- = g::= :: w.
s:-c:.s . :u _.
I h.7 5bSilinG Tnerrno AnalyticalInc. ;;- ; J .- - ... . .
m.: .,.. -
z.. .
ll ? P& f.* A M E C iC A A f f f i>Y.; *, f.' [ ,
41
..iv:::::cui. .'?w ui>:ic: t1::? / ,l -* ' , . < , . , . ' ~.;;7 '
a-: ! !:! ::!.:a
1
.U""E" kg s
... p-4- l BET 2 LABCRATORIES. INC. Ig w ' ' - 1
~~
- ENTioN St: SAN OVERBECK .
-;~9EU 966is GROGAN5 MILI. ED.
~
C'"52 f l
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 y ' ' ,j ._q W.O. NC. C.. a .6 0. ..a...a N 'YS S I l
a'erf r.oss G A1pha @,e_t.a,.;.,g g,,.g3 ,.3 g s, g p.,,,, m y,r,,,., m _,,, m m,_Tritit:a .g ;_' . ,.;;g c+r_.+,s 25 ( po# 9 7807,:L7.f,1..
>.;. 09/01/92 l )
--e ee.Amvsis . ~~~.7. L grd.. s ~ ' N Ofr--.(Ecr c.orewn onetuuusenna Sc sme. . is ai:r.vi- i C0RRECIED RE?C3!
.:::mer Date Type of Total Volume j entification Collected Analysis
.( m l..L -.. pC i /.1. . . .- . pC i/m l 1 q
I 1
i l
i l
t 1
I s ! !
I I
, 1 1
143155 j 10828507 08/27/92 Gross Alpha 3911 Gross Beta 166151
- l Cs137 <15 K40 <303 H3
<0.33 l
i Samples being analyzed for strontium 90 and potassiu: 40 on work order #92-10-101.
.,: :.: . . . . DAGE C:
FAX'
) REPORTED VI A TELEPHCNE iiflA ebertine ..
w..-.*
- v ." ce . .c., . ... .
- nc Analytic 2JInc. appmovE3 sv
.i s . a
- . *PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y. N E. p- / , / c.
.3UQUERQUE. NEW MEXICO 87109 /E, fl.
- ')HE (505) 345 3461 / <'/. ( 1 f!$05)731.$416 154
it ALBUQUERQUE LABORATORY Q
- 3MER BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. g d 1g 5 p\\u' "#,_ .:
vm N SL' SAN OVERSECE on6i
$h S'.[
s DOR E55 9669 GROGANS" MILL'RD. _-- -. .e 7N'92>
CITY T11E WOODLODS. TX 77380 y d.0 NO- 92-08-052
- )):"" ] : : g
_ tar Gross 'dpha/Sete.,__.._ . . . _ ..,...,...,_.a.7 dm rc. -'.\
a.t Tr i t.iu--.m. u. .. .:-.,.=
--_J -. : -. ' = . ...:
PO#97807 - r ".-.',:4.c.:~; .=-' sa"* ss *s:s'v n 08/07/99 ~
1 :'.,X'
- ~ ,
. - ? -
.c.s-.uv.p;nouwsts
..mm s -
I k
.cmer Date Type cf Total Volume 9tification Col.ected Analysis (ml_) ____pCg, L _ g Q/ml _ ___ _
0804518 08/01/92 Gross Alpha 4232 225 86 Gross Beta 292tS6 Cs137 <9.1 K40 314:230 H3 <0.33
, I
- t. , .. I I l l
I I
N i l
I i
l i
i I
imple being analyzed for strontium 90 and potassium 40 on work order #92-10-093 i I
l
-- ote= c7
- ssc:t E: vi A TE.E:-osE t_.l u x ,
.i..'1/ h Cha.rjm'
-- =.
1ermo Analyticallac. ,,, y . . . g ,,
Clif f Gravel, Dat.a Anal.vst :4'
+: nu suearcAN FREEWA Y. N.E.
sucutacut.
- a,
.vtw u!xico e7:09
-.a,ss. 9
/ ,/,Ayttg/ /^ (f.hNhb :--
i
' ;,n . f w il.1 W2 06:20 F-tr .s EFa :E3:0_1 : M3 o--wa w . . . .
~arrouen het: Laterstories. it... A I rrrumos Ms. Sussa overbeck l' l Acompu 96i9 Ororans Mill Ad.
I cTY The Amdlands. TI 77380 y 92-01-14U*
i w.o. M.
- Relee from 5112087 k h %]
Water-Strontium 30. Potassive-40 70 #64146 12/13/91 i
.umwn m .onen m m. I me ., u.. n.: .
l cue.mer Dses Typeet fetal Vol. y
.....-.~.........~..h.r.h Im !
ldentification Wiectas Ans, -
.. .... .i l . ., . . =.- pct /1 _.- ;
l 12/10/91 K-40 4217 1.5 saanle 74121256 2.9+-1.7 48 3r-90
. r l l
I l
l a
)
i I
f I
=
1 i
1 i
O wcnno vi. row . O *=
.' . l l
TlVIA ebertine rhenno Analyticarsne. _ , , . ,
Aa cc.rvs.n=iyAn Mu \
.=...-...-,,,
4L2Ltca'f 40*oE. wtn'a4xomi.4nm
. f 8.*vf **! .453499 i
i
)
(.
I 4 3Kgg -
ai h
BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. '*
.USTOMER TTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK 7 - !
/ 9669 GROGANS MILL RD, ,.
400REss 77380 ctTY THE WOODLANDS, TX hj ,?07,i O;r- RNR_YE ,
- n.0. NO. 92-03-288 03/27/92 P0 #65119 SAMFtts REclivf D CUSToutR onots ,4vueER ater.- Strontium-90, Potassium-40
.YPE OF ANALYSIS Type of pCi/l . . _ _ ,
Date Analysis ,
ustomer Collected ,,
dentif,ication
..-..r-
. .... <0.23 K-40 12/18/92 SR-90 1.7+-1.0 Sample-ID#31220515 IELMW18 4
9 eacg OF 1
Orax -_ '
l A TELEPHCNE
- g st
> 2berline CM'f Gravel, Data Ana
,,..e.a :. , . <
Bly ticalInc*
'sc.m n e s.u v. x g.
j V!.; ?.tEXICO si:c9
' tag.
- s m ~,: .-ovn . i m O5 D AE" BET 2 1.ABORATOR:ES, l .N C . O f.
A TENTION ADDR ESS SL' SAN OVERBECK 9669 GROGANS MILL RD.
W,
, I CITY T}{E WOODLANDS, TX 77380 W.O. NO.
y 92-12-01s -
l
- 30-- -
c_ - F N -
_YS S Water- Gamma, Gross Alpha / Beta, Tritium 97807 12/02/92 l me on=nysis . . . cusicuEn onoem e.uusEn Sw% ES PECElvED l
I i
f I
Customer Date Type of i::entification Collected Analysis pci/1 C1201513 (RW-E2) 11/30/92 Gross Alpha 6.6 3.9 I b 3 m Csl37 <14
({ pyh',.m ..i.u.ci K40 <318 l
s I
f I
i I
i
[ = s=c= s: v:: s_s=-:Ns O =u =:0E :-
1 RA Ebertine hermo AnalyticalInc. _,,, , . , .x. g .. +: .a. . e :
- 1 PAN AMERICAN FREEA A Y, N E.
LBJOUERCUE. NEW MEXICO 87109 l
//l," .';*lD
-:?.E 5:5 345 34??
r.. . . , . . ,
A3
.I y -
/
.3 R.Wiitis.ECGFisDiphE/Bita7.. Gam' i a7.JpitiU5Ni97807MAZb .-Gd 12/08/92
-.,u. . w-
. p tat.N wLisd v'* -~.,- 72;.~.*:,.:--ck uuruyw =w. nswInusaoeow.vuss er. -.. . - - . az se-cas asesiven i
i ' Customer Date Type of I
l ( Identification Collected Analysis pCi/l r~~ ,
C1204555 ( 2 7-S )'- 12/02/92 Gross Alpha <3.3
- Gross Beta 5.7 2.3
. O4.(-"A $,137 "l4*N <
o ' ^, K40 <317
,- g .ij es. L t C, , sk,E.NM .
rW coi \
I 1 :
I a
I g .
5, I
1 I.
Si i - - -
i
!s 1 j C FLEFORTED VIA TELEPHONE CFAX pAGE 0:
~
1
?l lira Eberline Th3rmo AnalyticalInc.
I
'.-.e.a: , . C l i i. r u.-a v e ., . v.a a Analys.
7C21 PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y. N.!.
l!
ALBUCUERQUE. NEW MEXICO 87109 5
PHONE.ISOS) r... 3453461
..... .... . , i
- w. / lllDT 102 l
I L
}
ALBUOUEROUE LABOR ATORY COSTOt.iER BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. D ATTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK ,
ADDRESS 9669 GROGANS MILL RD. l CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 W.O. NO.
T I 92 12-134
[
~ ' ~
Corrected Report -
5-\~, ;
Water- Gross Alpha / Beta, Gamma, Tritium 97807 12/16/92 fvPE OF ANALYS85 CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER $AMPLES Rf CEIVE D I
l Customer Date Type of ;
identification Collected Analysis pCi/l l l
C1214529 (17-S) 12/09/92 Gross Alpha 19113 '
Gross Beta 72!15*
H3 33131949 -
Cs137 < *i 5 K40 <351 c1214525 (17-D) 12/09/92 Gross Alpha 2.511.6 /
Gross Beta <3.5 H3 <361 Cs137 <13 K40- <396
= Sr90 and K40 analyses to be run on this sample and reported separately.
._[ = EPOF? ED VI A TE LEPHONE___ _.. J..F A ),. . . . _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ PAGE OF 1 1
.e pVi Eberline
- hemno AnalytiCalInc. OCf mu n e . Cliff G avel, Data Analyst
- ' iAN A h?ERICAts' FREfw/ Y. tie,
. ?COUEROVE. NEW A!EXICC E) 10F
--.'E o.nc5: it! ?. ( < Mn
. , . , . 147
- 7J
, ALBUQUERQUE LABORATORY CUSTOMER BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. W4 r ATTE NTION SUSAN OVERBECK g,4 I'4 ADDRESS 9669 GROGANS MILL ED. J.qy h.
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 y ~. --
W.o. No. 92-12-033 ,
h'
]-
~ " " - ~ ~
. b w.. .w
- 3CGfos.s.s- .9-
- '.!',.~.-_-.~ ~:;;
1 W, a.t3: I_lpha/.B. 'eta.
au .-e _
_Tyn er Antatnie " " - - .- :l ' ;?..G..am.m.a%itiniG.
.... .. a~
' - '- ., u. - -
~? t . 7807-
-~r-.=.,. .
'custouts omota.wuussa ,,.:.3.- ---M O sau*Lis mECEfvf D 12/04/92 l
?
r i
Date Type of 1 f' identification Customer Collected Analysis oCi/1 l C1202517 (RW-42) 12/01/92 Gross Alpha 3.813.5 Gross Beta <4.0 H3 411:230 V Cs137 <18 K40 <684 !
1
[ =so =Ts via s;s=uCNs : 1. X aOE C'
~MA sbertine Thermo Analyticallnc. ,,,,,v,e,, c;iff c;.3ye,, ata Analys. :i t
?:21 PAN AMERICAN FRE!WA Y. N.E. /
MBUCUEROVE. NEW MEXICO 87109 a .- :E s:s :<!.:st-g3 0l, l n$or /f /M' / _f ?
r-
! ETOMER Be t.Z Labo rft tori es . I tic.
ATTEMTION O y HS. Susan QVerheCN ADDRESS * *t 9669 Grocaris HiJJ Rd.
='
CITY W.O. NO.
The Woodlands. TX 77380 92-01-009 y q(hl
- :30 l ater - Gtoss Alpha / Beta, 6adium-2?'i,228, Tritium 0 C-43 PO #65119 TYPE CF AhM o 12/30/92 CusTOME A ORO4R NUMBER INI.!S R ECEIVf D
- stomer Date Type of Total Vol.
intification Collected Analysis ( all ) pCi/l g pC1/ nil CAMPLE-ID #B1220SJ5 12/18/92 GROSS ALPHA 3434 33+-12 $ O 0 V, g* > s ELMW38
~
- GROSS BETA 50.5+-9.0 H-3_s 1.29+-0.43 Ra-228 3.0+-2.7 Ra-226 5.29+-0.29 3 AMPLE-ID #B1220517 12/18/92 2970
'. ELMW15 GROSS ALPHA 9.6+-6.7 GROSS BETA 9.3+-4.1 H-3 0.63+-0.26 Ra-228 6.0+-3.6 Ra-226 <0.088
y' \
') rT.
1. ; . . . . . r;.-
, 3,
- 0... a
- D e N Lh
. ==sh.
\s, s
., c ., .; -
. 4. c . oW y n,,
,p , .
DucRTsa m :s._smous _
o ,,,x u.c s o, d & ,
A
} WI - Eber!ine }
-' 2l / / 3,.6/ G u
.harmo Analyticsiinc. b/*, ,W .-
. . Da .*. A *.*f ? t:A *; 9 f f;: ,t y, = * [ ......;,,,
I './ f '!: .' e
- J . Ihi .'e - titt l '. '!
. 2 . * *! ":L'i
- ~ . ,* p s; a 1;,
- .'f.;
- .*i?::'? !its )
l 1
I
ALBUQUERQUE LABORATORY currov.:n Et;; LABORATORIES, INC. "
ATTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK 4,4 ADDA ESS 9669 GROGANS MILL RD.
is-CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 7'380 M'7.0 g
W,0, NO. g2.}2 033 y n.
' ~ ~ ~ ' ~
\
b IE Wr$GYo'd D [pi[a Be't5f,7Ga 5aNTH tlEnU d 1S7807 E O N '
M,patiyak NY
+=axmma.x-+-=;=a=x== tL:.,..;.;;;.'.;;;;;g;:.= =~- . . .. . ,, . e. . m 12/04/92 l
Cust mer Date Type of ldantification Collected Analysis pCi/]
l l
l I
i I
g, l
C1202521 (RW-48) 12/01/92 Gross Alpha <2.2 Gross Beta <3.6 H3 3861223 Cs137 <17 K40 (649 l
I I
I l
f
'~
mE8*= E0 via ?E'E3'-ONE
, Eax
~~
- 12E C#
./lA ebedine ermanov*ennc.
'* PAN AMERICAN FPEEWA Y. N.E.
....,..,;,. cm cr e m . Dem m m : =m EU:VEROVE. NEW *.*EXI::27.*:3 l
- q,,ta;upur- (uls?//.'s
$ //17/, ~
/
l 2,
ALBUQUERQUE LABORATORY CUSTOMER BETg LABORATORIES, INC. ,
ATTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK ,.- -
ADDR ESS 9669 GROGANS MILL RD. -
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 W,0, NO. 92 12_041 Ig'V .' I. -
[)}[
~
Supplemental Report -
$2 .
Filtsrs-Gross Alpha / Beta, Gamma 97807 12/08/92 l TYPE OF ANALYSI5 CUSTOMER ORDER NUMBER SAMPL($ RECE lvED l
Customer Date Type of l identification Collected Ana1ysis pCi/ sample cl204557 (27-S) ! 12/02/92 Gross Alpha 55127 Gross Beta 107128 Gamma
- c1204572 (27-D) 12/02/92 Gross Alpha <l.8 ;
Gross Beta <5.5 l Gamma
- 1
= No significant gamma activity detected. j l
l
\ l l l l
l l
i C REPORTED VIA TELEPHONE Dr^x excE Or 1 1
, IRA Ebertine 7'ne(7no Analyticallnc.
teer uvio es cliff Gravel, Data Analyst cm 1021 PAN A AIERICAN f REEWA Y, N.E.
A.' BUQUEROUE, NEtV MEXICO 87109 - '
- "CNT 1505) 345 34G1 v .w , er . . ns .e 103 t I
OUOTOMER BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. Page 16
,, l k
ATTENTION gugAn oyIg3gcg ,j . g ADDR ESS 9669 GROCANS MILL RD. y(# , ,
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 g~,, { _ __ _
W.O. NO. 93-03-116
+
- ? ]-- 0"-
_YS S
. . . . . . . .. ..z . . , .: r~ ='. *"M: . = , . ~r trro-Gross Alpha / Beta, Gar:ma- ' :d 4 i97807 ~.' 03/09/93 2 #' t r ^~ ' l
- ' ' ' ~ ' !
,yy,c ovuuvs.is - ;cusTousa enote:NUM51M"' _' ___
- [
'[ SAMPLES RECElvtD i
l Customer Date Type of I Collected Analysis pci/s ar:ple
]entification l
l OHIO-17-D BET::D0305504 03/03/93 Gross Alpha 8.7 3.7 j Gross Beta 12.324.4 Ac227 <168 Am241 <6.8 )
B1207 <4.6 B1210M <9.8 Co60 <5.7 Cal 37 <7.0 K40 <l52 Ra226 <10 Th227 <23 i l
OEIO-17-S BET::D0305508 03/03/93 Gross Alpha 27.6 8.8 Gross Beta 32.616.9 Ac227 <170 ,
Am241 <6.8 Bi207 <4.7 ,
Bi210M <10 l Cc60 <6.1 j Csl37 <6.6 i K40 <l52 ;
Ra226 19:11 l Th227 <22 ;
I
'OE!O-27-D BETZ:D0308522 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 7.6 3.4 i Gross Beta 12.214.1 l Ac227 <170 Am241 <6.6 Bi207 <4.3 !
Bi210M <9.3 l Cc60 <6.3 l Csl37 <6.5 K40 <l47 '
Ra226 <ll Th227 <20 l l
] REPORTED VIA TELEPHONE FAX PAGE OF I TIT'?A Eberline "U AUUINECUIIUC ,,,aeveosv Cliff Gravel, Data Analyst C
lC21 PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y, N.E. . .
A *.9UQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87109
- 'ONE(SOS)34$.3461 }]3 1
[ 's . .
S y' ' -;:e
..,.r.r... a..e
- CUSTOMER BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. Page 12 #p$
ATTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK .9'd.
l ADDhetiS 9669 GROGANS HILL RD.
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 'T 905 k ..
l W.O. NO- 93-03-114
- ? ] - 0 + .Y. S S
"*ter-Gross-Alpha / Beta,_._.__., ------:. c.- - - - . .- m - .,
. ,cww,,y m,n[N77 03 / 0 9 /9 3
.Ltitu:1, Gemma M-2,0 J.NI,,-((,.' _ _ N. N " ~'.} lj 5,((. o7'@-i.I@l,$fe
_Iyppf. ANAL {$3_.a
- _ - Q_- 7g p_- . o _ . ; au - lCVSTOM(R ORoEFiff.UMBES M*M3hdYf _ *^(SAMPLES REClivED corrected Report Customsr Date Type of Idsntification Collected Analysis pCill y
HIO-17S BETZ:D0305501 03/03/93 Gross Alpha 15.3 12.3 i 0-Gross Beta 82.8215.1 ,', ' ,
y, 761!329 '
cs137 '<26 K40 <361 OHIO-17D BETZ:D0305505 03/03/93 Gross Alpha <1.3 Gross Beta <3.3 H3 <384 Cs137 <26 i K40 <366 OHIO-RW-70BETZ:D0308504 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 2.1!1.8 ,
Gross Beta <3.5 E3 <384 ;
I Cs137 <25 ;
K40 <354 ,
OHIO-RW-42BETZ:D0308507 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 3.7 2.6 Gross Beta 4.0!2.5 E3 <387 cs137 <26
~ K40 <381 OEIO-RW-48BETZ:D0308510 03/05/93 Gross Alpha <2.0 Gross Beta 4.022.3 E3 <387 cs137 <25 K40 <354 OHIO-RW-72BETZ:00308513 03/05/9,3 Gross Alpha 6.1:3.3 Gross Beta <3.7 H3 <386 Cs137 <26 K40 <337 r^ce or OnerOaTeOvirreteesONe O r^x 1 2 T!MA Eberline l .nermo Analyticallac.
i maovEa s t Cliff Gravel, Data Analys -
oc lC21 PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y. N.E.
ALSUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87109 / JU, PHONE (505) 345 3461 C2Y4GMKt7Cs.Kd1C ul W f/ /,0) 114
(- a- l i
ATTE N '.~t O N SUSAN OVERBECK
,. y ADDRESS ,.', j 9669 GRCGANS MI!J RD. ,.
c17Y THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 '
) W.O. NO. 93-03-116 af
--]
E
-. - ~ -. - --.. ...- . . - ~ .
. r.... , , ~ . - --~
Filters-Gross Alpha / Beta,Ga=ma 97807 03/09/93
'PE OF ANALYSl8 -- _a ,-..A_ CU370MER ORDER NUM8ER .,
- % SAMPLE 3 RECilVED Custorner Date Type of Identification,, _ , Colle
. - . .cted . . , - - _
Analysis- - - - - - - pCi/ sample 8 OHIO-27-S "
BETZ: 0308526 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 46114 \ l (rip.,' qgo Gross Beta 42210 / ' "
i
\k . ,
7 < 0 ( , p,
($ / B1207 <4.5
, Bi210M <9.7
,, y p Co60 <6.2
.. nV' cs137 <6.8
,.. K40 <147 Ra226 <11 '
Th227 <22 l
s b REPORTED VIA TELEPHONE CFAX PAGE 7 TIVIA sbertine Thermo Analytical /nc.
- m oveoev cliff Gravel, Data Analyst 21 PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y, N.E.
ALBUQUERQUE. NEW MEXICO 87109 PHONE ISOS) 345 3461 /,
eryruecevr. es.c 152 t
BETZ LABORATORIES, INC. Page 12 O (
ZU . TOM ER ~
l ATTENTION SUSAN OVERBECK ADDRESS 9669 GROGANS MILL RD.
CITY THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 Y -. .
g;
'~
OO w.o.NO. 93-03-114 -3 00 J
= !
.r%ross-Alpha / g,_774 g. o ggg, e '
ta,j$ ;Mt i
iTrl$ E57dE'EMdtti.9)7,hpg/JiscWiJ55$,1/i; dintuwgespragrg~b 578 71yg//th.W84gr$*x$'
MM 03 / 09 / 9 3 g rtrDiMdsW'r?Ae6Ws36HueWiW:m*M'm'. saunts arctivro Corrected Report Custornrr Date Type of Identification Collected Analysis d /J j
OHIO-17S BETZ:D0305501 03/03/93 Gross Alpha 15.3112.3 Gross Beta 82.8 15.1 E3 761 329 Cs137 <26 K40 <361
/
CHIO-17D BETZ:D0305505 03/03/93 Gross Alpha <1.3 Gross Beta <3.3 E3 <384 Cs137 <26 K40 <366 OHIO-RW-70BETZ:00308504 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 2.1tl.8 Gross Beta <3.5 H3 <384 Cs137 <25 K40 <354 OHIO-RW-42BETZ:D0308507 03/05/93 Gross Alpha 3.7 2.6 Gross Beta 4.022.5 E3 <387 Cs137 <26
- K40 <381 OHIO-RW-48BETZ:D0308510 03/05/93 Gross Alpaa <2.0 Gross Beta 4.0:2.3 23 <387 Cs137 <25 K40 <354 Gross Alpha 6.1 3.3 l OMIO-RW-72BETZ:D0308513 03/05/93 Gross Beta <3.7 B3 <
'386 Cs137 <26 K40 <337 r^oe or l REPORTED VI A TELEPHONE Or^x 1 2 m
1 ii A-, Eberline .
Thermo AnalyticalInc. om seemovtosv Cliff Gravel, Data Analyst l o421 PAN AMERICAN FREEWA Y, N.E.
/
l ALBUQUERQUE. NEWMEXICO 87109 PHONg c~...,.(5,05) 345 345 g G4yf }f [/f)
r B.252509
)
contain detailed information about delays associated with EPA's promulgation of each of the foursets ofradiation protection standards.
Factors DelO Factors that have contributed to EPA's delays in promulgating the f l
Radiation Standards' of standards include their low pnority and unsuccessful attempts to )
nevelopment resolve confucts and coordinate with other executive agencies, particuiariv ooE. nac. and oxe.
Low Priority Has Delayed Standards' Development Delays in developing and completing management, disposal, and l standards have resulted, in part, because EPA perceives radiation protection as havmg a lower priority than other EPA aCliVities.
Consequently, EPA's Office of Radiation and Indoor Air has not received
\ the necessary resources to promulgate final standards in a more tim
,% manner. EPA's Science Advisory Board has ranked radia d other than indoor radon) as a low risk to natural ecology r elfare. The Board's September 1990 report, which assessed and compared different enviromnental risks, ranked radiation below other problems such as habitat alteration, stratospheric ozone depletion, global climate chan herbicides / pesticides, and airborne toxics.8 Although the report ranked radiation as a medium cancer risk, it provided no overall ranking of the risk of radiation to human health. +
Officials in the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air said that beca resources are limited throughout the agency, EPA devotes most ofits resources to other activities having congressional orjudicial mandates, such as the Clean Air Act. While the Director of EPA's Office of and Indoor Air acknowledged that having mandates does not ensure that EPA will issue standards in a timely manner, she stated that the lack of such mandates almost guarantees that EPA Will be unable to do so.
Developing radiation standards is a resource-intensive process because EPA's standards must be adequately supported in order to withstand challenges by other federal agencies, interest groups, and the public at large. Even the revision of standards remanded by a federal court, such as the high-level waste standards, may require additional study because more data are available than existed when the standards were first developed.
Despite EPA's increased radioactive waste management responsibilities, the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air's budget from October 1977 to September 1992 decreased about 18 percent once inflation is considered.
8 Board (EPA / SAD-EC 90 021, Sept.1990). Reducing Risic setting Prioritie Page 7 GAo/RCED-93126 EPA's Development of Radiation Protection standards
.z- em 4 $
S As i e $ .:
4 3 %e5g' 4 i t; 'V Sh 9 i pt apAd t .nih-l t
el N di 1$
i is p h
1, D u e o g ui S
e s si ,3s'sTge,a 1 1
,a a k q
i g
1,. > ;
d I So ,
1 i
.. +
e n gpg g
A
/
tm 7,; %,$,44 e
g3 kkk s '. ..., "..l*
' i 4
.. g :
- 16 ..
EE 6 o :4 i
~'** :5.1 5
- 's a
l
- 4
' A1
'.**l.',
~3 9
l 1
,a
- - . s p'.-
- t. i .l :1J.spg \
.6J
>\
'fQ_
i g
4
\
v ~a~ ~ g-p l '
3
'i li f
) '
ww.*
=
~~ ~~~
s;+
/,TJ l
9 ; d . ,
h kk i ,
~
n-s
& \ % ;
3 h'. '
D as s. \g,' i .. 9 fqf 9 f* ,
_ . l!.D .f;,i!'1.":. .M '
0\ 'I.) sl ssa l 0 q
%:a % O a '#
t.I,j,. , o -
~
Ca a s rn, ..
~ ' ~ ~ . . . . _ _ . .
.A .
.t.
gs p ,
1 4 4s $d
.a #'n Uu%s euli ks 3- -
a As ams i y -
o g
t a
i 5 sg e
a3 a: t s
n {o 's1 gks1 s,3sg s - -
G '4 tie 3]e o i
\
.... <so%o .
g 1 ' %g i
,,'.' s s
j gW gl) IS
/ e 3
a ' a
. x-
) ' b M;n cyp i
~ .TpQ:::::, g L
.e u
e e
sin
, i.
y*t kl.$ n 1. .':. .'.,
.n. . .". : l a,- n. , h! .'$
a Ct-9 ._.i.
i h
L S
s a Q ?
il i>
4' w _
__ ti
__ : s;i '
1
9 ' __ _ t a %,, ' >Why
=,
. . \ ..::4. s oa a
pl 'j ..... -
a '-
yr T
{ . .:' ' ~ -
- p 9. O 7n4~ ,
~
h
..&..(-')
P .,...
(s c -
[3p F
en ac o s
- w. . -
3S a e e o s rn- gg/.
i.h.- J
- ~ ~ ' ' '
ii gr- -
) l f viu ,4).fok l y]
!:...i! -5 l
M
) <
S. +I -: a ?. ,
m
,~~ , . , 'n l J
l.kal s 1
! ?- ?!$ ,M: ; 0<
'N
%)D 4'@
A r o N N w .e s -
H e s 4
q) o s?
(k 3
/K si
I '
~
l Senator Metzenbaum i Congressman Dingell Congressman Sawyer
-Senator Glenn Governor Voinovich USEPA Director, Carol Browner .
Region 5 Administrator, Val Adamkus I SAB, c/o Robert Flaak I OEPA, Gerry Ioannides Rod Beals Jack VanKley, AGO Lee Fisher, AG Robert Horowitz, Stark Prosecutor Henry Cole NRC Tom Grumbly, DOE Mick Harrison, esq. GAP Rick Sahli, OEC David Aultman, esq.
Steve Hindall, USGS Dr. Barry Johnson, ATSDR ,
l l
I JLT poncerned Citizens of Lake Township P.O. Box 123 Uniontown, OH 44685
l* 1 l
l l l
statements of concern, which can be substantiated by eye witnesses, video tapes of meetings, transcripts, letters or just the simple review of the facts as they presented themselves regarding our project manager.
An additional example of a serious situation that you have j apparently chosen to ignore or dismiss would be regarding the j million pico curies of Tritium radiation that was 1
" invalidated" by one of your former staff members in Columbus under very questionable circumstances. You should have been j very concerned, because the laboratory itself indicated that the QA/QC was fine, and yet your agency took it upon itself to throw this extremely high reading _out that was found in a !
residential well. The importance of youc staff's decision on l this matter was critical and far reaching. But based on your I letter criticizing me, we take it that citizens shouldn't come to you about such incidents, because it would again be viewed as "a personal attack" and written off. This leads us to wonder about what would happen if one of your own staff had similar concerns about one of their peers or fellow agencies... Would they feel free to tell you about their concerns, or would they feel as I do right now?
Please be informed that I will continue to write about and expose potential wrong doing as president of CCLT and on the behalf of our citizens whenever it is felt necessary, because we care deeply about the residents of Uniontown and wcat to 4 see justice for these people and I want to see children grow J up free from diseases like cancer. Your entire approach to '
this situation is unfortunate and very discouraging to our ,
citizens, because the fate of my community is ultimately in '
the hands of the state, when the o & M is taken over. If you do not act in an open and forthcoming way with people now, we will have no confidence in what your agency does here in the ! '
future in monitoring this site. I used to have very good feelings toward Ohio EPA and was very loyal, continually supporting OEPA*S work here in Uniontown publicly, but no longer.
Sincer ly, !
, h Bu b Christine Borello/ President Concerned Citizens of Lake Twp IEL Superfund Site cc:
following page -
l 3 1 I
1
'/ 1
/ 0 )
1 s .
It appears to those observing this situation that you are trying to divert attention away from the true issues here at IEL,(which~are technical and professional as it relates to judgement and' decision-making and how these factors influence outcome) - by portraying our letters of concern as being
" personal, malicious and wholly unwarranted." What you are then suggesting to us is that the actions and decisions of your staff are not to be held accountable and we, as taxpayers and stakeholders, are not allowed to question them, even if we sincerely believe the health and welfare of our community may be seriously compromised as a result. Then, it we dare to take issue with such actions and decisions, because we haven' t gotten satisfactory answers, 'we era ourselves attacked and our goals questioned, trivialized and l even smeared. 1 Not only am I offended for the sake of all vocal victims of toxic waste in Ohio by this attitude, but I do also take this on a personal level, given my extensive work and with your ,
agency.in the past. Indeed, I. spent countless hours, unpaid, I helping your staff by providing anecdotal information as well I as highly technical information. This was on a daily basis for many years. At one point not too terribly long ago, but prior to Ms. Corkran, I was referred to by an OEPA rep as an
" equal partner", because of my extensive work with your people. (Many times I took alot of " heat" for them in TIC meetings, because as a citizen, I had the ability to verbalize concerns that we had jointly shared and we had previously discussed at length, whereas, OEPA reps were more reluctant because of political pressure - it's just the way things are~and I accepted this role). It was at that time I that your own staff shared such serious concern about what exactly was going on here at IEL concerning the high levels i of radiation being thrown out by some parties in the state, I that they encouraged me to go to the Senators for help, saying that they wanted to talk'to'the Senators' people. We feared reprecussions for these OEPA whistleblowers, and tried to protect them in our own way, by documenting the events, but of course, any reprecussions have been since vehemently denied by your agency.
In your letter to me, you suggest pursuing our concerns about Ms. Corkran to the Ohio Highway Patrol or the IG. We will take this under advisement and consider doing so. However, we still think that you should have been personally concerned and fair about our various complaints from citizens. For the record, we stand by all of our previously written 2
^
Y' .
f&ff$$ PQtC,ulhi(b CD /*y fi) (AUGkgot)fh
- q .f 7/17/94 TO: ' LINDA KERN -REGION 5, USEPA IEL Remedial. Project Manager FROM: CONCERNED CITIZENS OF LAKE TOWNSHIP /IEL SUPERFUND SITE RE:- JULY ~12th' MEMO.FROM KERN & STORM SEWER TESTING The purpose offthis correspondence.is two fold. First, we would like to. register our extreme displeasure regarding your July:12th memo & the. letter that was attached that you felt
" appropriate" to send to the entire TIC committee, apparently because Administrator Browner chose to say some nice words to CCLT president, Chris Borello,'and the TIC in general.
May we point out.that-this was a long-awaited personal correspondence-between Browner and Chris Borellef (and the list designated by Carol Browner to receive "cc s)" of which your name, nor the TIC's, was not among, but that you apparently-had access to internally at EPA. Also, your memo to the TIC was dated the same day that Borello's own copy was received finally from headquarters via a fax. Wd certainly do not share your opinion that it was appropriate or even ethical to distribute Mrs. Borello's response from Browner without seeking her permission. We nardly think that you would have considered doing this if the letter, let's say, had been correspondence between' Browner and Dr. Barry Johnson of ATSDR, even if some complimentary words were used in a closing. paragraph mentioning the TIC process.
If you did this because you feel that it is your responsibility to keep the TIC informed at every moment anything pertinent is said or occurs, we can think of many things that'we have not been privy to that we think we should have been told about that would be important to the TIC. For example, how about~the fact that we've cat all these yearc on this. committee andLwere-not informed by USEPA that (it is our understanding) the PRPs had filed in Federal Court over
- 4. years'ago naming our Lake Township, North Canton, some
- local-schools, our Uniontown fire department and many other entities as third parties to our cleanup costs. Don't you think'we had a-right to know about such critical information that obviously has a tremendous impact on our cleanup and our affected local community taxpayers and financially strapped County; not1to-mentionfour relationship on the TIC with our PRPs lawyers? .Or, have you ever distributed memos to the TIC
.from your frequent meetings'and/or closed door conference 1
Il aut 2 2 e
n l
calls between the State EPA and Region 5, or ATSDR, in which l the IEL case is discussed which we believe would be quite l
informative? Has the TIC ever been "cc'd" on communications l between the PRPS and EPA concerning discussions on remedies and/or costs at this site that have a direct bearing on our community and its future? NO. F69 believe we were singled l out and you took liberties with our letter because we are ,
1 "just citizens", who as usual, are walked on and treated l differently than officials and PRPs. l i
Secondly, we are formally once again requesting that USEPA conduct a thorough analysis of both sediments and gases in storm sewers leading away from the IEL site in various directions, for both VOCs and' radiation. We make this 4 l
request independent of whatever the final report from USGS shows concerning groundwater movement. We base this on the following: g,,,, f 9.; _ c , ' /. >
/4~ w
- Our TAG experts have determined from PRC data that the IEL site generates approx. 150 tons of toxic gases per year.
- It is a scientific fact that gases can migrate independent of groundwater movement. The gases will take "the path of least r esistance". i.e. , they will divert around clay lenses through the sand & gravel, seeking lesser resistance.
- The argument put forth by Ms. Corkran of OEPA at the last meeting where she showed charts of USEPA contractor, PRC's, offsite soil gas analysis does not specifically address the concept of " preferential pathways"- that conduits such as the storm sewers provide. Therefore, indeed, sewers could be channeling volumes of gases away from the site into neighborhoods and such data from soil gas monitoring would not reflect such an occurrence.
- You are aware that large volumes of such toxic VOCs as Benzene and Toluene were dumped at the IEL site & have likewise.shown up in numerous soil gas samples taken by ERT in select areas away from the IEL site last year. Until such preferential pathways are examined fully, EPA cannot state with assurance that IEL is not the source - regardless of groundwater flow direction!
- Your arguments against storm sewer testing for gases and sediments that you and Ms. Corkran put forth to the Stark County Engineers office this spring do not hold up under scrutiny. . It is our understanding that you said that nothing 2._-
n g.* ,
~
\ .
could get from th'a landfill because the slope would all be to the east, given the grade of the landfill. However, you are aware that there is a " dike" along the western side of IEL l
and that water historically has run off of the site to the west because of this slope. You and OEPA were provided at the April ERT meeting held to discuss Northwest Uniontown U8 EPA's own 1987 analysis of dosens of drums that were pulled up from the site on this western boundary in 1985 during the installation of the gas extraction system when ERT dug down eight feet and encountered at least 50 broken barrels. Contrary to what EPA has said to~the County about nothing could get to the sewers on Cleveland west of IEL, l this evidence clearly shows a wide variety of very toxic and l
persistent chemicals, including PCB's and various VOCs and merely represents a fraction of what could have migrated outward not only via soils but through sewers.
i Additionhlly, we have retrieved from our files a clipping I
from the Beacon Journal from either Dec. 1984 or winter of I '85 bearing the headlines, " POISON FOUND IN WATER NEAR STARK LANDFILL," (see enclosure) in which your own ERT project manager at the time reported that high levels of ethylbenzene and toluene were found just "eight feet below the surface".
We believe that both you and Ms. Corkran representing Ohio EPA are quite aware from conversations and reports from the County that the existing storm sewers that we seek testing of are located infront of the IEL site are at exactly the same depth'as the barrel findings and these very high readings that ERT found EIGHT FEET DEEP. If you check, you will learn that this hot spot was found on the western border of IEL, and again, the flow following the topography of this part of the site would be to the west and toward the nearby drain pipes that go north and south along Cleveland Ave. Therefore, both North and South drain pipes should be tested! The County has pinpointed a very good sampling location for you south where it all converges and we are sure they will be happy to locate this for you as they did for us.
Please be sure to forward this letter to your EPA
" investigator" who is currently researching possible sources of pollution in the area trying to link the Northwest well and soil gas contamination. Surely they'll find this relevant.- -
l CONCERNED CITIZENS OF LAKE l TWP./ IEL SUPERFUND SITE I Cc: !
Elliot Laws - USEPA Headauarters I Senator Metzenbaum l Senator Glenn
.[ 1Zd9 EllivL Laws - USEPA Headquarters I Dr. Barry Johnson -'ATSDR
! OEPA DOE NRC l Stark County Officials i PlCk N wvv&or), N Q. ~t:A P ~