ML20195F411
| ML20195F411 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1982 |
| From: | Douglas Dodson BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20195F283 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 QI-QAP-11.1-28, NUDOCS 8606120116 | |
| Download: ML20195F411 (7) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
y BROWN 1 RCOT, IMC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION CATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 QI-QAP-11.1-28 8 1 f 44 M N IS Iggp A i, TITLE: ORIGINATOR: / / # 2-W ' "
VATE N REVIEWED BY: ) //s-Mz CATE 0F ASME COMPONENT SUPPORTS, CLASS 1, 2, & 3 APPROVED BY: e.,
b'U ///ed f 4 QA Managpr PATE'
.n , c n R N 'I h 1.0 REFERENC i , ,
1-A CP-QAP-2 sonnel Training and Qualification" 1-B QI-QPA-11.1-36 " Inspection and Verification of Salvaged Hangers and Parts" 1-C QI-QAP-10.2-7, " Visual Examination Weldments" 1-D CP-QAP-16.1, " Control of Nonconfonning It - i
. 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This instruction delineates the criteria and requirements to be used when performing installation inspection of ASME component supports, Class 1, 2, and 3. If a conflict exists between this instruction and the support drawing, the drawing shall take precedence.
2.2 RESPONSIBILITY The Component Support QC Superintendent shall be responsible for the inspection of component supports in accordance with this instruction.
2.3 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS All B&R inspectors shall be trained, qualified and certified __.
in accordance with the requirements of Rafara c H -A.
3.0 INSTRUCTION .
I4 3.1 MATERIALS PPlV 61 6 860512 ~i% -
CARDE85-59 PDR
=- r-
/ l l
~
ISSUE BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES
- JOB 35-1195 QI-QAP-11.1-28 8 2 of 4 JAN I 51982 3.1.1 Traceability Marking Transfer During cer:struction activities, the craf t shall trans fer ID markit.5,s to ti.e material being cut, prior to cutting. and log all pertinent infonnation on the " Material Identification Log" (MIL; Attachment 1). _
Prior to cutting, the QC Inspector shall verify material acceptance to the Material Requisition (MR), ID markings are transferred and all pertinent infonnation recorded on the MIL is correct and legible. The QC inspector shall sign
' and date the MIL for acceptable transfer of markings as
. (//0)c correct, legible entries on the MIL.
ht/ (
1
. The MIL shall packages.
become part of the construction hanger NOTE: Prior to division of a bundle of bulk material, each piece of material shall be identified with a heat number. A heat code and purchase order number may be used instead of a heat number. Prior to division, QC shall be notified so that the markings may be verified in accordance with the applicable QA procedures. This inspection shall be documented on an IR and transmitted to the Owner referencing the original RIR number.
3.1.2 Material Traceability Control During fabrication, evidence of material acceptability will be provided through the use of the MIL by the craft. The log shall then be presented to the QC inspector who shall verify by comparing log entries against the identification on the material . Evidence of this verification shall be documented by the inspector's signature and date on the MIL.
The package.
log will remain as part of the construction hanger
' At installation inspection, the QC inspector shal verify NFORMATION the material type, grade. and heat number on the "Q Hanger Inspection Report" (Attachment 2 and 2A) and the Mult1 le Weld p8
~
Data Card (MWDC; Attachment 3), by signing and dating,
- ing the infonnation provided on the " Material Identification og."
Qh.
l When work travelers are used during fabrication o installation, material verification may be made using the e
_S
_ ,_ , . _ . . -.~ *
.. me * * * -- e'> "'
g
f
- l l
ISSUE BROWN & ROOT, INC. ' NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES QI-QAP-11.1-2E 8 3 of 44 JOB 35-1195 pp3$ ,
l Material Requisition as long as the MR number is recorded and verified on the work traveler by the QC inspector and a copy of that MR is attached to the traveler.
3.1.3 Protective Coating Unique Identification Number Transfer' For all coated bulk steel intended for use in the Reactor Building (as designated by the presence of a "QP" unique identification number), the QC inspector shall verify and document the transfer of the "QP" number (prior to cutting) in accordance with QI-QP-11.4-22.
3.1.4 Material Dimensional Control Component support material type and description shall be as shown onCMC's.
applicable the " Bill of Materials" of the drawing and any Component support material " cut lengths"- shall be as shown in the detail sketch of the drawing and any applicable CMC's.
" Bill of Materials" will. not be used to verify material cut length. '
3.1.5 Material Salvaging Component support parts such as structural steel, snubbers, spring cans, etc., may be used on component supports other than those for which they are designated, provided requirements of Reference 1-B are met. If salvaged materials are used, a copy of the Salvaged Hanger Inspection and Verification Report shall be incorporated into the Hanger Package. '
When an item is salvaged for use on a support other than the one for which it was designated, the original support number shall remain distinguishable on the item and shall be suffixed with an "S" to denote the item was salvaged. The QC inspector shall verify that the items description and the original support mark number are recorded in the
' lNFORMAT10h- appropriate spaces provided on the Material Identification 1.og and that the letter! "S" has been properly stamped on COW ,gY the item.
If vendor fabricated hanger parts with ASME Code plates are
)p]a y salvaged and used on hangers other than those for which designated, the Code plate (s) shall remain attached to the item if one or more welds remain. Alternatively, the Code
--.n -.- - .
/ -
~
ISSUE BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES JOB 35-1195 QI-QAP-11.1-2E 8 4 f 44 5M plate (s) may be removed, provided the original support number is transferred to the vendor welded part. Construc-tion shall transmit the code plates (s) to QC by a 3-part memo. QC will subsequently transmit the Code plate (s) to the Owner for filing in the vendor data package. QC shall verify all original support number (s) that are transferred and document the verification by signing the MIL.
4.0 WELDING 4.1 WELDING INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (GENERAL)
Visual Welding Inspection shall be in accordance with Reference 1-C and the requirements of this instruction.
Weld filler material used in the welding of component supports shall be verified using the " Weld Filler Material Log" WFML in the construction " Hanger Package."
NOTE: QC verification of proper and correct entries on the WFML shall be by comparing the Weld Data Card (WDC) to the WFML. This verification shall be documented by the inspector's initials and date on
. tne WFPL.
4.2 WELDING INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS (FIT-UP)
Fit-up (tack welds) inspection shall be required for all welds per Ref.1-C.
NOTE: Cleanliness and fit-up hold points may te inspected simultaneously.
The fit-up gap for butt weld joints shall not exceed 1/8 inch beyond the diameter of the electrode used at the root of the joint.
The fit-up gap for "T" fille't join'ts shall be as small as INl FORET ON practical.; however, it should not exceed 1/16 inch. If the gap is in excess of 1/16 inch but not exceeding 5/32 inch, C,1, ,
this condition will be considered acceptable provided the leg of the fillet weld is increased by the amount of separation in excess of 1/16 inch.
Dy i ~
- m
f y e
. ' ' \ .. . .
~
[ . .
\
ATTACHMEMT To cpp- Sco\ -
6/2.a/82.. 1 JOB NO. 3::.1 e:: N 3 -
42 C E;v;= p 'Gibbs S HI//, Inc.
g ._
~ n JUN 231c82 ARMS .
j(-
- ... INDEXED - >
4 E C C j \._/ g,, s --
B & R CCC CIST, D
'"85 F
j June 21, 198:
.. . PROJECT McR. .
-_. PRC1ECT ENGR. l GTN- 59850 QA McR. l PRC1ECT Cont. EncR,l [
Texas Utilities Generating Cc=pany Post Office Bcx 1002 M CO QA Glen Rose, Texas 76043 pggjgg gg.: n Attention: Mr. J.T. Merritt AM i/ n Manager of Construction & Engineering Gentle =en: -
TEXAS C"'!LITIES GENERATING CCMPANY
~
CCMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION $Y/) Y
,, G&H PROJECTJ:0. 2323
-' INTERPRETATION OF SCOPE UNDER IE-BUL*.,ETIN 79-14 REF: 1) II BULLETIN NO. 79-14 RIV. 1 (7-18-79)
In response to H. Harrison's request, we offer the following as constituting our interpretation of the scope of review under the subject IE Bulletin 79-14.
Paragraph 1, on page 2 of the subject bulletin Ref. (2) requires that: .
A. "The action items that folicw apply to all safety-related piping 2-1/2 inches in diameter and greater and to seismic Category I piping, regardless of sire which was dyna-4cally analyzed by computer.".
The " Description of Circumstances" appearing in Ref. (1) states:
B. .......where design specifications and drawings used to obtain input information for seismic an-alysis of safety-related piping systems, that it is essential for these documents to reflect as-built confieurations. Where subsequent use, Tamage or modifications affect the condition or configuracion 71 Pom Pam393 Seveam Ave 3 'eier 23M?SC27M Engineen a Cetgmom w vem.s vom iceci C,N Cias cao.e:cieesm se vem 2 s rso. consm.eton
7
- f. ,
, ,~ ' % ,_- . .
- k .d M 6N T . "D CPP-800t [ss[2LM.
, s GTN- Texas Utilities Generaging Cc=pany - . ,
._ . f-
. .. . . ~? ,
~
' i . -. -
of safety-related piping systems as described in . ... .A '.
docunents from which seismic analysis input information _.C -
was cbtained, the licensees must consider the need **'
to re-evaluate the seismic analyses to cons der the as-built configuration." : ., ; . .
. q ... . ;-
~
Thus,theprimaryconcernofUSNRCappearhtobethatthe '
results of seismic analyses of safety ra. lated piping, not- I withstanding the original design input, must be consistant with as-built c:mfiguraticns. In practical ta=ns, there must be a .
i high degree of confidence that re-evalua-ion and/or re-analysis :
- of the as-bu'it piping and supports would produce results closely to the results of the original analysis based on design basis ,
configurations. _
..; 1 C. Construed against this interpretation, the safety class systems, or portions thereof, that must be included in the CPSES as-built verification effort are as follows. .
.. 1. All class 1 piping systems and their class 2 and 3 extensions up to and including the first
- anchor or natural, te.. inal point (E.G. equipment or a 3-way, restraint). .
- 2. All class 2 and 3 systems, 2 inches and larger; ,
this would include: i a) all stress problems originally computer analyzed l b) all lines 2h inches and larger originally analyzed by NCMOGRAPHIC or EDS ALTERNATE methods ,
c) portions of 2 inches and under lines connected l to C.2 (b) above that cannot be dynamically l decoupled, and which must therefore be included as part of C.2 (b) problem boundaries.
- 3. All class 2 and 3 high energy lines over 1 inch that were originally ocmputer analyzed to limit the number of postulated breaks.
- 4. Such high energy lines identified by G&E, alboit they are not class 2 and 3, and not within the general intent of the subject bulletin, must be l included when minimum number of breaks were postulated by computerized seismic analysis, i
i i
- . - . -_. ---. . - - . _ . - - - . - _ - . _ . - - . . - _ - . . -. - - - . , . .-.i
\. '
,f., ,
. ~
A TW1f M sNr s To vpp-seei
(= /2a/a .-
GTN- 59850 June 21, 1982 Texas Utilities Generating Company ,
.+'
~~
D. Specifically, the moderate energy lines 2 inches and .
'r ' smaller which were originally analyzed by the nomo- .*- _-
. ~-~ .
' graphic method or using the computer (ADL PIPE Code)
- or by a ecmbination thereof, need not be included in .
'ie as-built effort provided that: .
~
.t. . The lines were inalyzed employing as-built piping geometry;
_'. ] ~
- 2. The supports used in the analfsis were confirmed .
by " layout" preceding analysis;
- 3. The supports were installed on analysis location
~ '.
- - := and within specified construction eclerances; ,
- 4. Significant deviations from D.3 were reviewed by 7-c.- the analysis group with primary responsibility . .
for such;
- 5. The supports were conservatively designed.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
-J- - -
GIBBS & HILL, Inc.
om m 2 . .W.
e 0
p ...
--,' Rchert E. Ballard, Jr.
. Project Manager REBa/MAV/CIC/EH:ek 1 Letter CC: ARMS (B&R Site) OL M. McBay (TUSI Site) lL J. Johnson (TUSI Site) lL H. Harrison /D. Westbrook (TUSI Site) lL J.C. Finneran/J. Ryan/P. C.a.T (TUSI Site) lL E.R. Deem /C. Gay (TUSI Site) lL l G. Krishnan (TUSI Site) lL j
i l
l
-..-.-.c
,,.....vr---,,-,,-,r--p.--. ,-w.-pm.~---..,,r,-..-,,.-.-- .s-,, . - . , . , . , - - . , . , , - . ,x ,,, ..-.e--- ,.---ew ..n- ,-e,,,-r,- e w-
.w:
o.s
- ~
t -
T
'IEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC. PRCCEDURE REVISICN ISSUE PAGE
(' CENTRO 2 7 ~~
,5 CP-EP-4.0 3 DNrE 6-11-82 1 of 3 v v -
IESIGN CENIEL PREPARED BY ((h /
APPEVED BY / e [/j
/ \'r # / /
/ // /
1.0 REFERENCES
{
1-A 'IUGCO/IUSI CPSES CA Plan 1-B CP-EP-4.5 Design Verification .
1-C CP-EP-4.6 Design Change Control 1-D CP-EP-3.0 Organization 1-E CP-EP-6.0 Preparation cf Engineering Procedures 1-F CP-EP-7.0 Control of Engineering Procedures and Instructions 1-G CP-EP-16.3 Control of Reportable Deficiencies 1-H CP-EP-18.0 Control of Records Turnover Activities 2.0 .GENTRAL
(' 2.1 PURPOSE The pirpose of this procedure is to outline general requirements for the site design control program to ensure that activities that affect the design of safety-related or cther designated items will te adequately defined, developed, verified and documented in accordance with the provisions of Reference 1-A. .
2.2 DEFINITIONS 2.2.1 Desicn Process 'Ihe design process consists of technical and management functions which conmence with the identificaticn of design inputs and conclude with the completion of the final design.
2.2.2 Final Design - Approved design output documents or approved changes to tnese dcc m.nts.
~
2.3 RESPCNSIBILITIES
'Ihe Engineering and Construction Manager is responsible for the developnent, inplementation and management of design dccents.
'Ibe Engineering and Construction Manager has specifically delegated the detailed irplementation of the design program to the Managers of Conceptual and Functional Engineering. 'Ihese Managers shall ensure that engineering' design activites are identified, planned and ;
( t- olled in accordance with Paferences 1-A,1-B, and 1-C.
j# E01A-85-59 sh2.
=
1
, ._. ._. - _ . - _ _ _ _m . __ ._ _ _ _ ,
. Y
'IEXAS UTILITIES SERVICES INC. PIOCEDURE REVISICH ISSUE PAGE
( tare CP.-EP-4.0 3 6-11-82 2 of 3 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1.1 Assianment of Design Responsibility te design program shall entrol the design of all safety-related structures ard conponents and any other areas designated by the Engineering and Construction Manager acknowledging the roles of the various organizations. ,
3.1.2 ErxJineering Procedure and Instruction Personnel within the site organization per 1-D shall establish and inglement pcocedures/ instructions as required to inplement the design / engineering program. Engineering Instructions shall be used to mntrol specific design tasks required by the Engineering Procedures. Rese instructions may be for su6 tasks as design planning, design interface ccntol, design input and crotrol of design documents. Se instructions shall be prepared, issued and controlled per the provisions of Reference 1-E and 1-F.
3.2 DESIGN INTERFACE CCNTIOL 3.2.1 Application Design iaterface control shall be gplied when the design activity of one organization, internal or external, includes or affects the design activity of other organizations. Bese considerations shall normally be defined in established procedures / instructions.
3.2.2 tbcumentation When an interface has been identified, the following .shall be prepared with appropriate management approval.
- a. Identification of titles and responsibilities of key personnel,
- b. Establishment of lines of comunicaticn and controls for the flow of design information and changes.
- c. Control and distribution of all documentation.
3.3 tESIGN INPUT Design inputs, upon which final design is based shall be ' identified, M = anted, reviewed and approved on a timely basis. Design inputs shall be detailed enough to provide a consistent basis for naking design decisions, acconplishing design verificaticn and evaluating design changes. ,
. _4. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - __ ___ _ _ _ . . ._ __ _ ___ ___,
- -( - -
'IEXAS UrILITIES SERVICES INC. PRIEDURE REVISICN ISSUE PNZ DATE
(
CP-EP-4.0 3 6-11-82 3 of 3 3.4 CCNTRCL CF DESIGi DOCINENIS Ehgineering procedures and instructions shall cutline cbcument control requirements when applicable, such as:
- a. Document issue and distribution.
- b. Adequate control across design interfaces in accordance with Section 3.3. t
- c. Assurance that proper cbcuments are identified arri available ,
throughout the design program. ,
3.5 [EFICIENCIES AND NTCCNECRMANCES ,
Significant deficiencies and nonconformances discovered during the design process such as deviations to the design bases as reflected in FSAR comnitments, design errors or deviations frczn the @plicable codes or standards shall be documented in accordance with Reference 1-A and 1-G.
3.6 RECORD REIDirICN AND 'IURNCX/ER
'Ihe originating organization / discipline stull assure that sufficient records are prepared as design work progresses to furnish documentary evidence of the quality of the design process and to reflect coupliance with documented Engineering Procedures / Instructions.
Design records required for retention during plant cperation. shall be collected, stored an$ maintained in compliance with Reference 1-H.
-m-N- -
- w- -
t - ----v -w-- w-