ML20195C045

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Replacement Page 15 of App a of Revised Security Plan for UCLA Training Reactor
ML20195C045
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 08/03/1976
From: Catton I
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
To: Rusch B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20155H438 List:
References
FOIA-85-196 NUDOCS 8806220105
Download: ML20195C045 (2)
v • d • e


Text

g

m. UNIVEllSITY Olt cal.II- (NI A,1.0S ANGELES

' r,\

i ,r ,

HtHa>461

  • liu ts ' IH51% p
  • I Hs A %t.61 F 4 e lus>H9H4
  • 4 4 N 14 H.O
  • 4 4 N F H A Nt 4%M .

{ .

44 % 8 4 1141414144 8 4 4 % I A ( pt'l i '. f.'[",!

brilOO!. 0F ESCthF F ftlNC AND A rrLIFD %CIENCE LOS ANCELt.5, CALIFOltNIA 90034 Augu- 976 T'I' /

e;g -

ef N

SY f ,,*g Bernard C. Rusche, Director C 'S 9/' -

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation s

,,s. #r.0/,43sh U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[-)> h.

t liashington, D. C. 20555 Doc ,# -142

Dear Sir:

. Due to the sensitive nature of the contents of this letter, we request that this document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2. This letter concerns the revised Security Plan for i the UCLA Training reactor dated 'pril 1,1976.

Due to recent events, please replace page 15 of Appendix A.

Sincerely,

(&[62l dz f% 1. (* 77 Dr. Ivan Catton Director Nuclear Energy Laboratory j l

IC;CCA:vi

Enclosure:

page 15 of Appendix A 1

\

i l 6

8052 8806220105 080603 PDR FOIA PDR AFTERGOBS-196 NL'Ct.E AR ENERGY 1. ABOR ATORY IV AN C ATTON. DLiertor

f

' University of California. Los Angelos

  • School of Lnginccring and Applied Seicnco

. NUCLEAR LNLRGY LABORATORY D:ERCLNCY PROCLOURE l July 1976 Room 2567 NEL Lab Phones Boelter Ha1.

825-2040, 825-2825 A. For immediate action upon observance of danger from carthquake, riot, police emer-gency, flood, or enemy attack, shut down reactor, secure facility and assemble in control room if possible.

B. For immediate action upon observance of danger from nuclear hatard*, fire or explost.

proceed to E.

  • 'If 3 out of 6 radiation alarms trip off scale (high) from an undetermined cau .

this constitutes a nuclear hazard: 2 High Bay area monitors, Argon-41 and ef-fluent monitors, and 4 channels of 2 hand and foot counters.

C. For immediate action upon observance of a bomb threat either to the reactor, the lat. [

atory or to the School of Engineering in general, evacuate and notify NRC Region V.  :

D. If alarm in 1540 BH (suberitical and radioactive storage arca) is sounding, evacuate '

.. area and proceed directly to Step E-6. '

E. PROCEED TO: 3

1. Scram reactor, set off alarm, announce evacuation.  ;
2. Shut off ventilation and cooling systems.
3. Take reactor key, health physics suitcase, and available radiation instruments ,

' with you.

4 Proceed directly to Boelter Hall 2000 level patio, securing all doors behind yo'.

5. After gross personal contamination check, follow health physics procedures.
6. Call official personnel in order on list until relieved by one of the following.  !

A. Chuck Ashbaugh 348-6559 19. NRC Region V Operations '

3. Jack Hornor 839-2130 Robert H. Engleken i
3. Maurice Thelia 466-S886 S2-9 486-3141 or 415-486-3.

4 Neill Ostrander 342-8969 30. ERDA Safety 6 SNM Div: Ha-

5. Bill Debley 365-5418 82-9-273-7963 or 415-273-T.  ;

j 6. Ivan Catton 348-5477 21. Calif. State Health (Radia: )

7. Tony Zano 714-540-3695 Safety) 916-322-2073 l
8. Environmental 825-7147 22. State Police i l

Health 6 Safety S25-6995, 825-7298 916-322-2073

9. John Xaufman* 825-6900, 645-1849 23. Calif. Disaster (Radiation
10. John Evraets 475-1358 Safety) 916-421-4990 776-6008 24 NEL-PIA Liability Engincer; 1A.- Harold Brown
12. UCLA Police 35, 825-1491 Nuclear Energy Liability /Fr UCLA Physical Plant 825-1391 Insurance Association, The 13.

14 UCLA Campus Information 33 Exchange, Building 3 Loft .

15. Los Angeles Police Emergency 478-0841 Suite 323/Farmington Av/Fa: l
16. Los Angeles Fire Dept.(Veteran) 473-1155 Conn. 06032 20 -677-7713
17. Los Angeles Sheriff Dept. (WLA) 456-6652
18. NRC Region V Security: 82-9-486-3141 Doug Schuster or 415-486-3141 .

.  ; o.

'. ,. ~. . .

, gEF,I iiai: ....s. -

%; , , , 2.n0 lin0s.l.c_ .ou 4 & ' - "-

'] i t.uG 1 t 1975 i

l i The Regents of the University of California Docket No. 50-142 School of Engineering Los Angeles, California 90024 Attention: Russel O'Neil Deap.pf. Ingineering q

s ss

Gentlemen
'

, This letter refers to the inspection of your activities authorized under.

NRC License No. R-71 conducted by H. D. Schuster of this office on July 29-30,1976. It also refers to the discussion of our inspection findings held by the inspector with Hr. N. Ostrander and members of nis staff on July 30, 1976.

The inspection included examination of activities related to physical protection against industrial sabotage in accordance with applicable requirements of Title 10. Code'of Federal Regulations, Part 73, "Physical Protection of Plants, and Materials." your Security Plan, and license

. conditions pertaining.to physical protection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility personnel and observations by the inspector.

' Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your activities was r.:.t conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as i set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.

The item of noncompliance is categorized into the level as described in i I

our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.

, . This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 i .- 'of the NRC's ."Rules of Practice " Part 2, Title 10. Code of Federal

~ Regulations. Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office within l

20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement of explana- l tion in reply, including: (1) steps which have been or will be taken by you to correct the violation, and the results achieved; (2) steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; end (3) the date when full compliance witn be achieved.

In accorcance with Section 2.790(d) of tne HRC's ' Roles of Practice, Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Hegulations, docunentation of findings of your. control and accounting procedures for safeguarding special

. , .n

  • IE:V

___ g__ . _ _ . . _ . _ . - _ .

......* -_ Schuster;s n2 .Rizzolo_. _ _. . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . . _

..w .. 8/13/76_ _S%3bL _ _ . . _ _ _ _

r.. ac.m u. ..m aa ua o...........,....u........

J?temn a re . E /f

s. .- -

3 i

. 1 University of CaliTornia gut 1 0 1915 s, ,

nuclear materials and your facility security procedures are exempt from disclosure; therefore, the enclosure to this letter, tho inspection report, and your response to the item listed in the enclosure to this  ;

letter will not be placeo in the Public Docu.ent Room and will receive '

limited distrioution. ,i t

Should you have any que discuss thern wishyn ,stjogs. concerning this letter, we will bej glad to Sincorply Atad 8)  !

Vircent ft M '

l t

V. N. Rizzolo, Chief '

Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

A. Notice of Violation l,

,B. IE Inspection Report No.- 50-142/76-01

{

t cc w/ enclosures: i H. V. Brown Environment. Health and i Safety Officer {

t

. 1 i

i i

I l ,

!. e l e l

  • e I  !

t 9 -

, 'XLUA 2.790-4.a. n_o,u,,_ n, ,n,,n, APPENDIX A University of California at Los Angeles .

Docket No. 50-142 '

i License No. R-71 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Based on the results of. t(m,MC inspection conducted on July 29-30. 1976 it appears that;tWbf'your activities was not in full compliance with -

applicable NRC regulations and conditions of your license, as indicsteci I below. I '

l During a key inventory taken August 8.197b it was determined by the j Laboratory Security Officer that one security related key was lost and one security related key was duplicated. It was determined July 30 i 1976 that contrary to good security practices no corrective action had j been taken. , i This is a deficiency.

...... I i

i [

l ,

i i

6 n.r; .7.b

'. c .p ,. )S. st Ih.)). ] 19 ,

.. .J n:.n .

.6, .

i,. .: .;; w n : e >r io t1 J J , . . . a.-

..:iaaWitrEcifR Mi L . .'. O.* i. ',, e~

I l

I I I i

l 1

r -- 7

,-s

....g-. m l ,

E.

O

  • n n ') 9 +v m n na ovu4 & s v i j/>7 1 l

, - ~ - . . . . . . ._

l

-o - .

s

'y -

l ,.  ? C' : MQ w. Ol.\%T.QN l

l p.'.Q l '. I'lW i

G. W. Roy. Crief. Field Coordination and Enforcement Branch. IE:HQ w .p A. .

UNIVERS!7Y0FCdiFORhlAATLOSANGELES DOCKET NO. 50-142 Enclosed is the report of the special physical security inspection conducted on July 29-30. 1976 for the above facility, as a result of that inspection one item of noncompliance avid several security weak-nesses were identified. ,

Security Weaknesses i~

1. Essential equipment is not specifically identified in the Security Plan. (See Report Details.' paragraph 3)

. 2. Ine reactor control room is considered an operational area rather I

than a security area. Large plate glass windows,1/8 inch in l tnickness, separate the control room from the reactor. (See Report Details, paragraph 4)

3. There is need to improve tne procedures pertaining to corrective - 1 action resulting from inspections and inventorics and tc add 1 additional information for bomb threats. l Vulnerabilities We must conclude that UCLA, a non-power reactor licensee, is vulnerable

. "f..to the three man threat. militarily trained, armed with semi-automatic

, . .,.l weapons and an insider's knowledge of the facility. With the exception

.of the materials storage area there are no door alams. The present i 'alam system is concentrated in the reactor high bay. It would be possible to force any of the many doors leading and adjacent to the )

reactor, and then under cover of that room enter the reactor area. Once inside the reactor room, even though an alarm would sound. It is esti-mated that there would be sufficient time to complete a successful act of sabotage and depart by a different door into a multiple array of hallways to avoid apprenension.

c.!d:d ssw th Oncem i ' M V. N. Rizzolo. Chief.*

im.i n wi c . adfeguaros eran'.n #

....... Letter _to UCLA w/riotice._o (. Violation ar1d . _.J E.:V/hc5 IE Inspection Report No

_ ._. W . -- -.

,7..,..,., c,50-14U

, , . ,76 _01_Schaster:sms Rizzolo

..... ._....._~ T T .1: . "T.i g/13n6 - F/ A b6 e.- acw a,.. ..m acu em m........................w.........

~

l f2 52 2 TG---M- .2.ff '

Sent to Wilda Mullinix. HQ w/ enclosures for distribution Letter sent to Accessions i Unit. HQ, for:

' POR, N31C Tic l Central Files (w/ enclosures & memo) l 4

Letter distributed by IE:V:. l i

State of Califo g y y ~ ~" .. .. ,

Cy of ltr w/ Appendix A: Engelken, Johnson

bentw/enclosuresto

W. Martin IE:I W. Kenna. IE:ll J. Hind. IE:111

~

t l

I -.

0 I

E

.. .2k . .. ... /$ .6,, 1

' ' ***' i )

con - - )

^

., v.;n l 1

_..L " r

.I

.,' _ ..:.op#^;f!C 4

. t ., - J, '

i .

I

. i e

i

.! i j .

s t

l 1

I

-- a

, __ _-__m_ _ , _,. .,__m,,,r. _ r., .r,,7___. . ._ ., ,_m._m. m_, -.

y. , , . . . _ . - - , _ , . . - . , , . _ . . . _ _ , _ _

1

" , U. S ELEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION , , , _

  • - . 0FFICt., OF INSPECTION AND ENTORCEMENT . W 4/.

. REGION V II Inspection Report No. 50-142/7A-n1 (trv.1an)

University of California at Docket No. 50-142 Licensee R-71 Los Angeles License No.

I

- Priority

. Group Tacility 04t43ary  ?

,, Location Los Anoeles. California 90024 Type of Tacility Training /Research Reactor Type of Inspection Special. Unannounced. Physical Security Dates of Inspection July 29-30.1976 Dates of Previous Inspection May 20, 1975 l l

Prir.:1 pal Inspectior O"1 O *

$-/S-7 6_

. M. D. Schuster, Physical Protection Inspector Date j Acco:panying Inspectors None ,

Date I Date other Acco=panying Personnel: None Reviewed by . .- b--- F e 3 / y r, D*t*

V. N. Ridolo.'pdef, Safeguards Branch

. - . . . cl / Deco;es

..[..s.c;es i.rr,m,.p: g,. m g a

.l .W'?c %D WITHoqL.sRIC;C '

1 m o v AL W .;y

. 10 (~ D g 70 3 wir,y ... r g

IE:V Forn 219 e

s.-

n .,,ono u A Y h % % % W Y' /Y

. - . y , . , - . -

g

. gy, 2 ,,ye ir mi, _.

. ,3 , 3 a

2. Security Areas The reactor control room is not considered a security area.

(Details, paragraph 4)

3. Procedures Tnere are no provisions for corrective actions as a result of reviews, inspections or inventories. In addition, only limited information is available in the event of a bomb threat. (Details, paragraph 7)

B. Assessment of Licensee's Response to NRC Request for Review and Auonentation of Security At the time of notification to lice.: tees (February 1976), UCLA was considered a safeguards group 5, accordingly they were not notified.

Management Interview The exit interview was hel,d on , July 30, 1976. Attendees were as follows:

UCLA N. Ostrander, Laboratory Manager J. Horner, Resident Health Physicist C. Ashbaugh, Laboratory Security Officer B. Taylor, Research Physicist NRC Region V M. Senuster, Physical Protection Inspector Items Discussed / Scope of Insoection The scope of the special inspection was reiterated to be an examination .

of the licensee's security program and equipment with emphasis on their capabilities to withstand an external attack and included the following areas:

Procedure No. Subject 81705B Pnysical Protection - Security Plan 81710B Physical Protection - Essential Equipment 81715B Physical Protection - Security Areas 81720S Physical Protection - Security Systems t

a ; C i?. ~ 7 ' " - " s - ;;4-MD4W- 4 4 to th g mme

=y *

, g CW2.?on IP 'r,0W ATiGH-

- 3-  !

81725B Physical Protection - Security Organization ,

81730B Physical Protection - Access Control

81745B Physical Protection - Security Program Review l 817508 Physical Protection - Protection of SIN l t

The licensee was advised of the item of noncompliance and replied that prompt correctiye . action would be taken. The licensee indicated they  !

would consider the security weaknesses for possible solutions. With respect to defining essential equipment the licensee indicated they '

would pursue that item with Licensing.  !

I I

l r

t

[

J l

t t

b T

i e i e

j 1

ee

    • - e e og

- U CIA 2.770 lN'??fo ^,T'ON

~

. Details s

1. Time on Site ,

Arrived - 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />, July 29. 1976 Departed - 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br />, July 30, 1976 Total manhours on site - 10

2. Persons Contacted T Zane, Reaclor Supervisor N. Ostrander, Laboratory Manager J. Horner, Resident Healtn Physicist C. Asnbaugh, Laboratory Se:urity Officer J. Carter, Lt. UCLA Police Department
3. Essential Equipment The licensee's new security plan (April 1,1976) paragraph 1. A contains a general description and refers the reader to the attached Appendices A and B for a further description. Essential equipment, if any, for this Argonaut reactor such as; the reactor, reactor coolant system, reactor controls, etc. have not been designated.
4. Security Areas  :

The fuel storage area (radioactive storage room) and the reactor  :

room (reactor high bay) are identified as security areas, access to i which is controlled by an "A" level key.

t The reactor control room is considered an operational area (as are the classrooms) rather than a security area. Access is controlled by the "B" level key. ,

5. Security Systems The licensee's security plan sets forth the controls and a descrip-
  • tion of the lock and key system. A review of the licensee's security log revealed that a key inventory was conducted on 8/18/75.

The following was entered: "Leight lost "C" level key, Police Department made at least one extra "B" level key - marked it as B- ,

14." As a result of that inventor / the licensee had taken no action to correct the noted deficiencies. This was identified as an item of noncompliance.

' [* i U; &
  • L MN* *
  • =me ,%g,, ,

,_ _ ~ ~ _ __ - - --

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20195C045&oldid=3346790"