ML20155K283

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Proposed Revs, & 0715,to Security Plan for UCLA Training Reactor Acceptable Except for Provision Described in Encl.Requests Response within 30 Days
ML20155K283
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 09/25/1975
From: Goller K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hicks T
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
Shared Package
ML20155H438 List:
References
FOIA-85-196 NUDOCS 8806210161
Download: ML20155K283 (2)


Text

.

[

,1ED STATES . s N .I A P 4EGULATORY C O f. SSION w AsMINovoN o. c. aosss .,

4 &

SEP t 5 ":75 s

.a. 142 The Regents of the University of California Nuclear Energy Laboratory ATTS: Mr. Thomas E. Hicks Director Los Angeles, California 90024 Gentlemen:

We have reviewed your proposed revisions, dated June 20, 1975 and July 15, 1975, to the Security Plan for the UCLA Training Reactor, approved by letter dated January 8, 1975. We find your proposed revisions to be acceptable except for the provision described in ,

the enclosure, which is being withheld from public disclosure.

Within 30 days following receipt of this letter, please provide us with a written response to the comments contained in the enclosure.

Sincerely, i

AuR Gds Karl R. Goller, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors ,

l Division of Reactor Licensing

Enclosure:

Coments on Proposed Revisions  ;

to the UCLA Security Plan 9

^

J 8806210161 PDR 080603 FOIA AFTERCOB5-196 PDR 1

-_ ___ __F/7.--l

I ENCLOSUPG COM4ENTS ON PROPOSED REVISIONS TO T11E UCLA SECURITY PLU At Section D.1. of the plan you state that only one member of the UCLA Police Department will immediately respond to an intrusion alarm and that additional personnel would be available te respond if needed.

Your Security Plan, dated .\ugust 21, 1974, stated that at least two members of the security force would immediately respond. h'e find this change tends to decrease the effectiveness of the security plan for the facility. No explanation is offered for the change, and it appears that no compensating security measures have been provided.

We request, therefore, that you provide justification for this proposed change or revise your plan to reflect the previously approved level of protection. '

e 4

e

- _ _ . . - - -_ ------a - - - - - . , - - - - - - , . , - - - - - ,--,,,e -a--.er v,.---w- m - w - eo~-e --ww.---~~-w- -~~m*-w-