ML20195B254

Informs That Licensee 770120 Changes to Security Plan for UCLA Nuclear Energy Lab Not Acceptable.Statement for Transmittal to Licensee,Identifying Areas That Must Be Changed,Encl

ML20195B254
Person / Time
Site:	05000142
Issue date:	03/31/1977
From:	Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Lear G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20155H438	List: ML20155H433 ML20155J880 ML20155J917 ML20155K253 ML20155K277 ML20155K283 ML20155K303 ML20155K341 ML20155K368 ML20155K389 ML20155K408 ML20155K417 ML20155K420 ML20155K571 ML20195B206 ML20195B254 ML20195B261 ML20195B278 ML20195B297 ML20195B322 ML20195B345 ML20195B386 ML20195B441 ML20195B532 ML20195B574 ML20195B649 ML20195B674 ML20195B709 ML20195B785 ML20195C045
References
FOIA-85-196 TAC-06519, TAC-6519, NUDOCS 8806210353
Download: ML20195B254 (2)

Text

M p* ** %

f ,c, UNITED STa f ES

[ -[.

I , N.l,7/ . I NUcsE AR REGULATORY COWissiON W ASHING TON. O C 20555

%;k WAP 3 1 19n TAC No.: 6519 Docket No.: 50-142 MEMORANDUM FOR: George E. Lear, Operating Reactors Branch No. 3, DDR FROM: Robert A. Clark, Chief, Operating Reactors Safeguards Branch, 00R

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO REVIEW ASSIGNMENT - REVIEW OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES SECURITY PLAN Licensee: UCLA Review Branch: ORSB Branch and LPM: ORB-3, D. Jaffe i Review Status: Waiting We have reviewed the licensee's letter of January 20, 1977, which included changes to the security plan for the UCLA Nuclear Energy Laboratory. We find areas of the plan that are not acceptable and should be corrected. A statement is attached for transmittal to the licensee thtt identifies the areas that must be changed. This statement is to be withheld from public disclosure.

1 Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Safeguards Branch Division of Operating Reactors

Attachment:

As stated cc: K. R. Goller D. Jaffe J. M. Elliott 8806210353 880603 PDR FOIA AFTERGO85-196 PDR

N3'E-UNIVE3SITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES SECUPITY PLAN Occket Nc. 50-142

1. The plan states there is a one-man foot patrol at least once every one and one-half hours around and through the Engineering Suilding Boeter Hall between the hours of 1630 and 0130. This patrol is to check doors and to see if there is any unusual activity taking place. Tne patrol should be made once every two hours, between the hours of 0130 and 0800 and once every four hours d.: ring all other periods to include weekends and holidays, when the Nuclear Energy Laboratory is unoccupied. Therefore, it is requested that your security plan be changed accordingly.

2. The plan states that the reactor consolc is not considered essential equipment because the reactor controls have been tied to the intrusion detection system. While the level of protection afforded the r,eactor console has been increased; the function of the console has not changed. Consequently, it should continue to be identified as an essential component. Please change your security plan accordingly.

3. The removal of the Sargent and Greenleaf padlocks fror" the crane and concrete plug reduces the effectiveness of the security olan in that control of access to the irradiated fuel element storage pits has been degraded. Consequently, this change in your plan is unacceptable and should not be implemented. Your revised security plan should be modified to reestablish access control.

l l

c __ - . . _ _ _ , . - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ - - . . - . _ - _ _ . _ , _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _

_ _ u-,.