|
|---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--FACILITY
MONTHYEARML20155K4201976-07-12012 July 1976
Evaluation of UCLA Security Plan
ML20155K3891976-05-10010 May 1976
Evaluation of UCLA Security Plan
1976-07-12
[Table view]
Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20127K2821992-12-31031 December 1992
Final Decommissioning Rept for Boelter Reactor Facility Dismantlement & Final Decommissioning Project
ML20046B8661992-12-31031 December 1992
Final Decommissioning Rept for Boelter Reactor Facility Dismantlement & Final Decommissioning Project.
ML20128G2171992-11-30030 November 1992
Final Release Survey Rept for Boelter Reactor Facility Dismantlement & Final Decommissioning Project
ML20247Q7801989-07-28028 July 1989
Safety Evaluation Re Phase II Decontamination,Dismantlement & Disposition of Component Parts of Reactor.Health Physics Program Provides Adequate Protection to Assure Radiologically Safe Program for Dismantling of Facility
ML20155C6331988-06-0909 June 1988
Rept of UCLA Reactor Decommissioning,Guide for Phase II, Final Phase
ML20211Q3321986-07-14014 July 1986
Safety Evaluation Supporting Decommissioning Plan Phase I, Per 851029 Application.Addl Info,Including Campus Map, Diagram of Lab & Dismantling Organization Chart Encl
ML20138M9051985-10-31031 October 1985
Decommissioning Plan:Phase I:Dismantlement & Radiological Assessment of UCLA Argonaut Reactor Facility
ML20127K1791984-12-31031 December 1984
Annual Rept 1984,Nuclear Energy Lab
ML20080K5581984-02-13013 February 1984
Ro:During Annual Reactor Calibr,Two Control Blades Exhibited Prolonged Drop Times,One Slightly Exceeding Acceptability Limit.Problem Lies within Core.Steady Viscous Drag Indicated Possibly Due to Lubricant Degradation
ML20095L0001983-12-31031 December 1983
Annual Rept 1983,Nuclear Energy Lab
ML20072G6861982-12-31031 December 1982
Nuclear Energy Lab Annual Rept,1982
ML20063E8851982-07-0808 July 1982
Ro:On 820630,during Initial Approach to Criticality,Operator Unable to Take Reactor Critical Due to Constant Engagement of Auto Controller.Caused by Failed Diode in Inhibit Surveillance Circuit.Voltage Diode Added Across Relay Coil
ML20038A9681981-11-16016 November 1981
RO Re Tech Spec Violations Reported on 811029.Procedural Aspects of New & Novel ESA Must Be Reviewed by Radiation Use Committee Prior to Implementation
ML19347E9371981-04-17017 April 1981
Operator Requalification Program
ML19341B5201981-01-26026 January 1981
Ro:On 810120,rods 1 & 4 Dropped to Zero Causing Reactor to Shut Down.Cause Not Determined.Console Returned to Normal. Reactor Returned to Power.Event Will Be Further Investigated
ML19330C7351980-07-29029 July 1980
Annual Rept-UCLA Nuclear Reactor,Jan-Dec 1979.
ML20050A7801980-01-17017 January 1980
Ucla QA Program Submitted Per 10CFR71 Re Univ Intent to Transfer MTR Type Fuel,Irradiated,To Carrier
ML19338D3601980-01-0303 January 1980
Ucla Reactor Is Safe Exhibit B.Fifteen of 22 Pages
ML19309G4041979-12-26026 December 1979
Ro:On 791219,during Routine Operation Involving Use of Pneumatic Sample Transfer Sys,Two Strip Chart Recorders Simultaneously Ceased Inking.High Flux Scram Occurred During Consequent Inkwell Refill.Caused by Operator Error
ML19275B6061979-10-0303 October 1979
Ucla Nuclear Reactor - Is It Safe.
ML19343A1731976-12-31031 December 1976
Atmospheric Dispersion of Ar-41 from Ucla Nuclear Reactor.
ML20155K4201976-07-12012 July 1976
Evaluation of UCLA Security Plan
ML20155K3891976-05-10010 May 1976
Evaluation of UCLA Security Plan
1992-12-31
[Table view] |
Text
_ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._
Docket No. 50-142 UC'_A S e c u ri t y P l an I have reviewed the letter f rom the licensee dated 4/1/76 which consisted of revised pages 1 through 8 (the entire text) of the security plan plus I
- revised figures 11 and 15 of Arpendix A. The revision was necessary, as reported by the licensee, to correct prior errors and update infor ation in response to an 16E inspection and an annual evaluation of the security i
plan by the licensee. The substantive changes in the security plan are as follows:
i
- 1. The steel cesh inner door to the radioactive storage room (containing
- 4. 7 Kg of SNM) is backed by a steel plate.
I
- 2. A new se: tion, "Operational Require ents" has been added which explains the use of the level C, B, and A areas, and the access requirerents i for the radioactive storage room.
l
- 3. The responsibilities of the Laboratery Se urity Of ficer are further specified.
4 The holders of A-level keys have been identified by title; names I have been deltted.
j 5. A statement has been added that only A-level key holders are j authorized to activate and deactivate the intruder detection system i
- in ths reactor room.
1 l
j 1
8806210200 0B0603
! ' PDR FOIA J AFTERCOO5-196 PDR 1
l
- 1. ;
MAY 10 B76
- 6. A code w A known to only two A-level key holders, is now necessary to pe tvation of the alarc system for the radioactive s t c r. is adds an additional degree of security to the area.
- 7. Irovisiens for access to the. same have been further explained.
- 8. The designation of "C" as a controlled access has been r-3ved f rom 9 access points on Figure 11. Each of these otherwise controlled otherwise by level A or B key Ic
- s. '
as emargency exits.
None of the above changes tend to decrease the ef., ,e the security plan, as previously approved by letter to the licensee dated 3/18/76. The security plan, as submitted, continues to meet the require-cents of 10 CFR 50.34(c) and 73.40 and is acceptable.
Sote: Appendix B to the letter of 4/1/76 consists of License A=endment 10 and amanded Technical Specifications, which are not considered a part of
! the security plan. .
Yc C. Richard Van Niel Industrial Secu-ity and l Emergency Planning Branch l i Division of Project Management l
j
. _ . - _ , _ . . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . ,