ML20195B261
| ML20195B261 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000142 |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1977 |
| From: | Mcpeek E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155H438 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-196 TAC-06519, TAC-6519, NUDOCS 8806210361 | |
| Download: ML20195B261 (2) | |
Text
<
4 0
UNITED STATES
^
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
g W ASHING TON, D.
C.
20555
\\.'..../
6519 Docket No.:
50-142 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Robert A. Clark, Chief, Operating Reactors Safeguards Branch, 00R FROM:
Eugene W. McPeek, Reactor Safeguards Engineer, Operating Reactors Safeguards Branch, D0R
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES SECURITY PLAN A review has been made of proposed changes dated January 20, 1977,'
to the University of California at Los Angeles security plan.
The evaluation of these changes are attached.
'Ty p, d bi$'
Eugene W. McPeek, Reactor Safeguards Engineer Operating Reactors Safeguards Branch Division of Operating Reactors
Attachment:
As stated 8806210361 880603 i
- - - - ~ --
MA: 3. $7' UN:'.'ERSITY 0:
CALIFORMA AT SECURITY PL AN LOS A*iGELES Docket NO. 50-Ic2 1
The plan states there is a one and one-half hours around between the hours of 1630 and 01on Boeter Hall and through check place. doors and to see if the Engineering Building e every the hours of 0130 and 0800The patrol should be rade 30.
This patrol is to Energy Laboratory is unoccupiother periods t and once every four hours durionce v ty taking n s and holidays, when the N your security plan be chang ng all ed.
2.
uclear ed accordingly.
The plan states that the r that detection system.equipnent because the reactor eactor controls have been tied console has been increased; th While the level of prote changed.
n al Consequentl ction afforded the reactor e function of ntrusion essential component. y, it should continue t the console has not-The removal of Please change your securit 3.
o be identified as an that control of access tand concrete plug reduces y plan accordincly.
effectiveness ofpadlocks from the crane has been degraded.
Consequently, this change io the irradiate plan should be modified tounacceptable and should be irnpiemented n your plan isstorage pits ss controlYour revised security reestablish acce.
e
W 3. 577 UN:'JERSITY Ot CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES SECURITY DLA" Docket No. 50-142 l
1.
The plan states there is a one-man foot patrol at least once every one and one-half hours around and through the Engineering Building Boeter Hall between the hours of 1630 and 0130.
This patrol is to check doors and to see if there is any unusual activity taking place.
The patrol should be made once every two hours, between the hours of 0130 and 0800 and once every four hours during all other periods to include weekends and holidays, when the Nuclear Energy Laboratory is unoccupied. Therefore, it is requested that your security pla^ be changed accordingly.
2.
The plan states that the reactor console is not considered essential eavipnent because the reactor controls have been tied to the intrusion detection system. While the level of protection afforded the reactor console has been increased; the function of the console has not' changed.
Consequently, it should continue to be identified as an essential conponent.
Please change your security plan accordingly.
3.
The removal of the Sargent and Greenleaf padlocks from the crane and concrete plug reduces the effectiveness of the security plan in that control of access to the irradiated fuel element storage pits has been degraded. Consequently, this change in your plan is l
unacceptable and should not be implemented.
Your revised security plan should be modified to reestablish access control.
e 1
I