ML20151H984
| ML20151H984 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Ginna |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1984 |
| From: | Crutchfield D, Dick G, Wagner M NRC, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151H203 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-26 NUDOCS 8405020330 | |
| Download: ML20151H984 (4) | |
Text
P i
INITIAL NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION AND NOTICING ACTION Docket No. 50-244 Facility: R. E. Ginne Licensee: Rochester Gas & Electric Date of applicationApril 15, 1983 Corporation Request for:
See attached sheet.
Initial Determination:
( XX ) Proposed determination - amendment request involves no significant hazarcs consicera* ions (NSHC).
(
) Final determination - amendment request involves significant hazards considerations (SHC).
Basis fcr Determination:
(
)
License's NSHC discussion has been rtviewed and is accepted.
See attached amendment requ'est.
( XX ) Basis for this determination is. presented in the attached notice.
1
(
) Other (state).
i N)
Y g Yd>5924 y#
! Initial Roticing Action:
( Attach appropriate notice of input for monthly FRN 1.
( XX') Monthly FRN.
Notice of opportunity for hearing (30 days) and request for coments on proposed NSHC determination -- monthly FRN input is attached.
2.
(
)
Indivicual FRN.
Same notice matter as above.
Time coes not allow waiting for next monthly FRN.
3.
(
)
No initial FRN. Valid exigent circumstances exist (evaluated below).
Local necia notice requesting public comments on proposed NSHC cetermination is attached.
4.
(
)
No initial FRN or local media notice.
A valid emergency situation exists (evaluated below) and there is no time for public notice on proposed NSHC determination.
5.
(
)
Individual FRN.
Licensee's claim of exigent or emergency circumstances is invalid (evaluated below).
Notice of opportunity for hearing (30 days) and request for coments on pr' posed NSHC determination is attached.
Letter of o
explanation to licensee is also attached.
6.
(
)
Individual FRN. The amendment request involves SHC.
Notice of opportunity for prior hearing is attached.
Letter to licensee also attached.
Evaluation of exigent er emergency circumstances (if applicable):
Accrovals:
Date l.
Georce F. Dick. Mr.
.#M" O'
/?vn
.o]
3mager)
/I
~
2.
. Dennis M. Crutchfield M/2/Ba (Branch Chief) f]I
.h d A' L
!j,1//e// ',e)64(.+e fi~.o C. Gqr.W l f
tj,c,,g,
- 3., MitYivem 0 n'A 0 Y mb h Frank J. Miraalia
@ E684 (Assistant Director) 5.
Not Applicable (Director, Division of Licensing) i
P pmc%'e, i
A# S/4 4.
UNITED STATES h [3 -
3 ff i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION M
g.;,3.,.,2d r
w-i wAssmcTon, o. c. 2osss
{
.'.... e Augu" "
~
[
Docket No. 50-244
[g) l2,4fi/fw, MEMORANDUM FOR: C rt
- C10,r,k, Chi e f p
Operating Reactors Branch f3, DL FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief ~~ *
- 9 %
Operating React 6rs Branch '!5,'DL y
a
SUBJECT:
REQDEST FDR'POBLICATION IN ' MONTHLY FR NOTICE - NOTJCE
'M$
0F CONSIDERATION'0F ISSUANCE"0'F AMENDHENT TO PROVISIONAL'
'R OPERATING L'ICENSE AND ' PROPOSED NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION DETERMINATION AND OPPORTUNITY FOR A y
HEARING L
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Docket No. 50-244, R. E. Ginna
/+
Nuclear Power Plant, Wayne County, New York 1f> ' ' F, 7 013A 's t 12, j96 3 WyY 4.,
Y>
Date of amendment reauest:
7husqhm NY'h a treens W 5
Description of amendment recuest: The proposed amendment would-appro've n 7fe -
'fAr 4m4.8
-</auyical specifications, (TS) to: (1) include pr:y:Mre:
tec to limit the amount of overtime worked by plant staff members perfortning safety-related functions, and (2) include the requirement that challenses to the pressurizer power operated rel ef va ves (PORV's) or safety valves (SV's) be reported 48 %8t<AApads we< <a&G/
9 3""
no less frequent 1 th na
-144d<uvai kn an onbn.nnual ba$s pu hpo'pe Basis'for'orcoosed no sienificant ha2ards consideration determination:
'j Generic Letter 82-16 requested all Pressurized Power Reactor licensees to 2
review thei,r TS to determine if they were consistent with the. guidance provided with the generic letter.
For items where utilities identified deviations or the absence of~ a specification, they were requested to submit an application for a license amendment. The Ginna iicensee deter-mined that there are no provisions in the TS that address plant sta'
)
overtime or the reporting of PORV or SVJ hallenget
% $ blN& cl Apl U, /9H, W<-
fk f,/f/3 sa A
or~ di b b. k cL w pea % Q1 m 9 =s w.4 Ju<aQin
[
y 4 ne in a:
i J-
/
-..tJ
.jfl - z /
/,v! e 1 J
_t..
i
\\
,/
y
., au u+ A p a+ t. rz w a s.
.u. w a n.
r
(
/
2-The Connission has providdd guidance (48 FR 14870 April 6,,1983)
~
concerning the application of the standards in TO'CFR 56.92 by indi,cating certcin ex'amples of actions likely to involve no significant hazards con-sidera tion..
Example (ii) is a change. that condtitutes, an additionaf libi-
.~
tation, restriction.or control not presently included in the technical 3
specifications:
for example, a more stringent surveillance requirement.
Since staff overtime and PORV and SV challenges are not addressed in the current TS, the proposed changes fall sithin-example'(ii) and therefore, staff proposes to determine that the requested changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
Local Public ' Document Room location:
Rochester Public Library.
115 South Avenue, Rochester, New York 14604.
Attorney for licensee:
Harry, H. Voigt, Esquire, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae,1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W., Suite 1100, Wa s hington, D.,C,.
,20036,,
~
HRC Branch Chief:
Dennis M. Crutchfield
\\
wh gp,.:,
~
~
D nnis M. Crutchfield,' Chief erating Reactors Branch f5 Division of Licensing a_
~~
cc:
Docket ORB f5 Reading G. Dick H. Smith e
,