ML20138P559
| ML20138P559 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1984 |
| From: | BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138M609 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 PROC-840731-05, NUDOCS 8511070235 | |
| Download: ML20138P559 (24) | |
Text
__
1 July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS
-yv Page 1 of 24 Describe the function of the PROTECTIVE COATINGS EXEMPT LOG.
1.0 1.1 Identify the CPSES procedure providing the requirements for the EXEMPT LOG.
1.2 Track the revision history of the procedure, noting substantial revision items.
- 3
,",[5""**"..
s 8511070235 851016 PDR FOIA he GARDE 85-59 PDR
July 31, 1984 Draft of i
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS
" ;~~
Page 2 of 24 20 Verify that the method by which nonconforming coatings are identified, dispositioned, and entered into the EXEMPT LOG corresponds to the requirements of the procedure.
- 3 8vI M
N e
4 s-e t
F i
A, y
I t
de.
/
e
.---,.-,-,,,,-n-_.,
7
,,,,,,,m,.-------.
.r--
i July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
- ~;:~
EXEMPTIONS Page 3 of 24 3.0 Describe the input of each CPSES organizational unit to the process of evaluating items for inclusion in the EXEMPT LOG.
- 3 OOOEOOUUEOOMOOMMOOMMWMM666gMMMWWWWWgMgggggggggggggggggggggggg e
e g
o e+
s d
\\
ali
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS es?
Page 4 of 24 4,0 Verify that the basis for the inclusion of each item which appears in the EXEMPT LOG is provided by the CPSES specification or procedures.
- 3
@IV 4.1 verify that the basis for the inclusion of each item which appears in the EXEMPT LOG is is identified in the EXEMPT LOG entry.
- 3 O
e e
t
- ((.m
July 31, 1984 Drcft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
=?~r-EXEMPTIONS Page 5 of 24 5.0 Verify the functioning of the system by which coatings applied to equipment or components off-site are evaluated for conformance to coating specification requirements and either accepted for the specified service, designated for rework, or identified for inclusion in the EXEMPT LOG, as appropriate.
- 3 BII O
e s
J
... ~.
e e
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
..m.
1 24-EXEMPTIONS Page 6 of 24 6.0 Attach a copy of the EXEMPT LOG for each unit.
For each unit, list the sum of entries for:
a) concrete b) liner plate c) all other steel
- 3 e
i e
6 5
i a*::
--.~.--- -. -
I July 31, 1984 Draft of g
1 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
= =r.
EXEMPTIONS d:b-Page 7 of 24 Verify that an entry (or entries) has been made to the 7.0 EXEMPT LOG for Imperial coatings applied to containment concrete in combinations and/or sequences which have not
- 1 been specifically DBA qualified.
Specific coatings previously identified are those Note:
applied in the sequence llS/1201/11S/1201 or in the-sequence 11S/1201/11/1201.
SII Record or attach copies of the EXEMPT LOG entry number (s),
7.1 the item or area description (s), and area of coatings affected.
or other document which generated the 7.2 Identify the DCA, NCR, entry.
- 1 0
esen f
4 m
b e
- *a
)
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
..[,
EXEMPTIONS Page 8 of 24
[
If an entry has not been made to the EXEMPT LOG for the 8.0 llS/1201/11S/1201 or 11S/1201/11/1201 coated areas:
Record the basis for any decision to exclude these areas from the EXEMPT LOG.
Identify documentation recording the basis of this decision.
8.1 Check whether this analysis evaluated the area of coatings 8.2 affected.
Verify whether an entry is planned or presently in process.
8.3 Record the scheduled date of completion for any projected 8.4 entry.
- 1 8.5 ' Summarize status of interim actions taken to date.
- p. ~
po-O
'7:::
~ ?.f.'
w;;..
1 July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS Fi Page 9 of 24 Verify the accuracy of the basis for determination of area examine inspection 9.0 used in any of the above conclusions; records, drawings, NCR's, DCA's, or other documents as appropriate to establish the basis for area determination.
Identify extrapolations used to arrive at final computation 9.1 of area values.
- 1 b
O 9
9
+
b 4
..!E e
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS Page 10 of 24 10.0 The EXEMPT LOG includes an entry for Carboline CZ-ll primer l
/ Imperial 1201 topcoat applied to Richmond Inserts; see entry #30.
10.1 Verify the accuracy of area value; establish that there is objective evidence providing verification of the accuracy of the area value listed.
10.2 Alternatively, verify by examination of inspection records, drawings, NCR's, DCA's, or other documents as appropriate to establish the basis used for area determination.
- 4 O
4::.
e 4.'.}
,. - -, _.. ~ _ - - - - _ - - _
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT-AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII DIf -~
EXEMPTIONS Page 11 of 24 11.0 Verify that an entry has been made (or is scheduled) in the EXEMPT LOG for Imperial Nutech ills applied over foreign matter (e.g. nails, wood, rebar chairs, bolts) embedding in Concrete.
11.1 Evaluate the basis for calculation of area.
- 6 9
s B
a 4
e gas.
E.'p
---,,--2
,-3,-
-,y,-__,.
_w,--.___-----
---,e--
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS 25 Page 12 of 24 12.0 verify that an entry has been made (or is scheduled) in the EXEMPT LOG for coatings applied over hand or pcuer tool cleaned steel for which there are no inspection records which establish the adequacy of surface preparation.
12.1 Establish the accuracy of area calculation.
- 10 12.2 Identify the document which generated the entry.
e
July 31, 1984 Draft of l
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL L4B CPSES TRT
- c; si AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
=Cl ~
EXEMPTIONS Page 13 of 24 13.0 Verify that an entry has been made (or is scheduled) in the EXEMPT LOG for coatings applied over hand or power tool cleaned steel for which DBA evaluation is not available.
13.1 Establish the accuracy of area calculation.
13.2 Identify the document which generated the entry.
- 10 GII
'l e
e 4
0 9
.::EEr..
4 s.
e e
hi n..
-2
._,._,,,_.n..
_-n-,_e
..m-
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT i"
. AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS Page 14 of 24 14.0 Verify that an analysis has been performed to identify areas at which 11S/1201/11S/1201 has been applied at thicknesses over the nominal designed thickness of the system and up to 102 mils in thickness.
14.1 Examine and evaluate the basis used to determine the size of the areas involved.
14.2 Verify the documentation of this analysis by NCR or DCA.
14.3 Verify that the af fected areas have been (or are scheduled to be) entered in the EXEMPT LOG.
- 12 e
6 on 1::
+*
I 1
l
)
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS Page 15 of 24 (RFIC), dated 15.0 A Request for Information or Clarification,1983, provides that an in could overlap approximately one inch over the surrounding October 20, coating at a repair spot.
A previous RFIC,
/
epoxy (organic) 1983, does not permit inorganic zinc dated January 7, Examine and evaluate the engineering applied over epoxy.
justification for this change of requirements.
15.1 Verify that any appropriate entries have been made to the EXEMPT LOG.
15.2 Examine and evaluate the basis for determination of the.
g affected area, 15.3 verify'the document (s) which generated the EXEMPT LOG entry.
- 15 SII
- A
'l.'{
e;;
July 31, 1984 Draft of
~
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII
=.=5 EXEMPTIONS 3:
Pace 16 of 24 16.0 List the DCA's (and affected areas) which modify construction design requirements for a component or area from specification AS-30 to specification AS-31.
16.1 Determine if each affected area has been entered into the EXEMPT LOG. *30 a
O e
9 e
f' t
a YYeeen f
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT
~
AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII EXEMPTIONS e":
Page 17 of 24 17.0 Identify DCA's which have the effect of modifying surf ace preparation requirements for a component or area to an SP-6 criteria.
17.1 verify that each item has been entered into the EXEMPT LOG (or in the NOT-COATED LOG.*31
_________________________________________________________e a
0 e
4
& 'e'.
E
1 July 31, 1984 Drcft Cf i
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII t...E...
EXEMPTIONS Pace 18 of 24 18.0 Verify that the area affected by each DCA which has the affect of accepting unsatisfactory coating conditions (such l
as thickness, finish, surface preparation) has been entered to the EXEMPT LOG.
- 55 age mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm j-S e
O 4
p:?
s o
i i
$s s,
--.-,m.
,,,__,.,,_-..-..,-._.,mc--.-,_,.%
mm-..,--_.__%,
_,, _._ _,,,,,m
,,yr.,-___m,.
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKRAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII E
EXEMPTIONS Y!?
Page 19 of 24 19.0 verify that there are suitable records identifying the location of limited access or inaccessible areas.
19.1 Establish the surface area of each limited access or inaccessible area.
19.2 verify that each area has been entered into the EXEMPT LOG.
- 31 e
t O
tte O
G i
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII e5 EXEMPTIONS Page 20 of 24 20.0 Identify the level of supervision authorized to designate prior to or upon completion of coating work that an area (or class of areas) is a limited access or inaccessible area.
- 31 20.1 Identify the level of supervision authorized to determine in the field that an area is a limited access or inaccessible area. *31 9
e one e+,s i
s, Cil ??
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII de ~
EXEMPTIONS
$:se-Page 21 of 24 21.0 Verify that there is an entry in the EXEMPT LOG for coatings applied at expansion joints.
- 48 21.1 Review and verify the accuracy of area calculations.
SIV e
I p
J' t-4
,t:!":,
July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT iH AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII 22ij EXEMPTIONS Page 22 of 24 22.0 Verify that an 2nalysis has been conducted which identifies the area of cectings applied for repair or top-coating in sequences not described by procedure.
22.1 Corraborate the determination of the affected areas.
22.2 Verify any NCR's or DCA's generated in response to the analysis, and inclusion of the affected areas in the EXEMPT LOG as appropriate.
- 2 SII OIV 4
0 de b-
.a
July 31, 1984 Draft cf BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT
- s**:
AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII 1:.--
EXEMPTIONS Page 23 of 24 23.0 verify the basis given in DCA 18,489, Rev 1 for entries to the EXEMPT LOG for areas at which primer was applied at.5 mils.
- 11 O
e fu.U'.NN s
??
4h.'
July 31, 1984 Drcft cf BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VII su :.
EXEMPTIONS Page 24 of 24 24.0 Review and verify the area calculated for entry #41 (reactor cavity) to the EXEMPT LOG.
- 13 0
e G
G r-e.
~ 5I.. '.
r..