ML20138P508

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft BNL Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Technical Review Team Audit Plan for Area II DBA Testing
ML20138P508
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 07/31/1984
From:
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY
To:
Shared Package
ML20138M609 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 PROC-840731-01, NUDOCS 8511070207
Download: ML20138P508 (29)
v • d • e


Text

r July 31, 1984 Draft of

,]$h.

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT t-AUDIT PLAN for AREA II

~

DBA TESTING Page 1 of 11 1.0 Review regulations, Safety Analysis Reports, and specification requirements which establish the DBA test performance requirements for Service Levd1 I coatings.

1.1 Summarize or provide direct reference to the required performance parameters for coatings at CPSES.

  • 00 O

m b

D p.

O i

e ns 8511070207 B51016 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR

July 31, 1984 Draft of

~S-BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 2 of 11 2.0 Identify DBA tests results (supplied from any source) which apply to CPSES coatings.

2.1 List the applicable reports, coating materials, and significant test variables of each report.

  • 00 G

=

N....

m

~

't?

July 31, 1984 Draft of.

~'

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT

~ ~ " -

AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 3 of 11 3.0 Examine and evaluate available documentary evidence which provides a record of the specific surface preparation tools used for hand and power tool cleaning of ' steel substrates.

  • 10 9II SIV SVII O

e 3.

a JE

July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II 3..

DBA TESTING

~ ~ ~

Page 4 of 11

==

. 4.0 It has been established that there is a time period during which there was no inspection work performed (or inspection records) to establish the acceptance of surface roughness prior to coating application.

Establish that this practice occurred where hand or power-tool cleaning was employed as a surface preparation method.

4.1 verify the reported time period of this practice by a survey of inspection reports.

4.2 Lacking suitable inspection records, examine and evaluate other documents which demonstrate that hand and power tool cleaning performed during the affected period was adequate to provide the degree of surface roughness to provide good coating adhesion.

  • 10 e

'I e

E O

b e

~ _._

July 31, 1984 Draft of

~5-BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 5 of 11 5.0 Lacking documents which plainly establishe that the tools employed provided adequate surface roughness, examine and evaluate other documents providing an engineering basis (supported by testing results) adequate to provide confidence in the suitability of surface preparation work performed by hand and power tool cleaning.

  • 10

=

9 2=

4 9

+

_3.=.

y

July 31, 19 84 Draft of

~h; BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 6 of 11 6.0 Examine DBA qualification test results which provide additional information on the performance of coating systems applied over hand or power-tool cleaned s' teel for the coatings employed at CPSES.

6.1 Establish the basis on which the results of such testing may be applicable to the coating work performed at CPSES.

  • 10 SVII S

e 9

3...

0 9

T..

(

July 31, 19 84 Draft of h-BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II

"~

DBA TESTING Page 7 of 11 7.1 Examine inspection reports (IR's) which record the application of inorganic zinc coatings (e.g. Carboline CZ-ll) or' organic primers (e.g. Carboline 4191) overlapped onto adjacent epoxy coatings at areas of touch-up or repair.

7.2 Examine any DBA tests which provide an analysis of the results of this practice.

7.3 verify that an analysis has been performed to establish the extent of areas at which inorganic zinc-coatings have been applied to epoxy coatings.

7.4 Verify that an analysis has been performed to establish the extent of areas at which organic primers have been applied over epoxy coatings.

i 7.5 Verify that the results of these analyses have resulted in appropriate actions.

  • 15 SIV 9VII

~

h 4

+

T...

--m--

wme-,

July 31, 1984 Draft of

) lf" BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT

~'

AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 8 of 11 8.0 Verify the applicability of DBA testing which serves to qualify coatings applied to equipment or components off-site.

  • 3 6VII e

=

0 S:..

t e

e I

4 I

.=

July 31, 1984 Draft of DI BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT v="

AUDIT PLAN for AREA II

'"~

DBA TESTING Page 9 of 11 9.0 Verify the DBA qualification status of Imperial coatings for use in containment in the sequence llS/1201/11S/1201 or in the sequence 11S/1201/11/1201.

  • 1

@VII

.ao..a 9

O 9

N.

$ mme e

h e

c

.,r e

,,r

July 31, 1984 Draft of

^

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 10 of 11 10.0 Review any DBA test results which describe the performance 1

of coatings applied in sequences other than those supplied by manufacturer's published application bulletins.

10.1 Establish whether the results at such testing are applicable to areas at CPSES where coatings have been applied in sequences not provided by the nanufacturer.

  • 2 9VII G

l O

t 5

t 1

l 1.

A

-.,,,,..n

,e

.n,--._,,,-,re-,

---n-,-.---an-..,

l f

July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT

=.

AUDIT PLAN for AREA II DBA TESTING Page 11 of 11 11.0 Verify that the thicknesses of the coatings tested as reported on Carboline report 401684 correspond to the specified thickness for these materials a's applied at CPSES.

  • 5 E

a O

m S

==

6 e

d 9

s N...

  • N::

,c g

/. N

$ at : e f[ Tff'll\\

s */

AUDIT QUESTION MATRIX

(_l f/

s 31 July 1984

)

'}

9 Pago 1

?

.)

,% l\\.0Nl!k.'

C, ALLEGATION AUDIT AREA NUMBER NUMBER 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

1...OPEN......................S.............................P 2...OPEN......................S...........S..................P 3...OPEN......................S...........S...........S......P 4...OPEN....................................................P 5... RESOLVED..................P..............................

6,...OPEN....................................................P

\\

7... RESOLVED..............................P..................

8... RESOLVED............ no f urther action planned............
9... RESOLVED............ no f urther action planned............

10..OPEN......................P...........S.................S ll.. RESOLVED................................................P r

12.. O P E N...................... S..............................P 13..OPEN....................................................P 14..OPEN..............................................*......

15.. O P E N.,..................... P........... S................. S 16..OUT OF SCOPE........*....................................

17..OPEN..................................P..................

18..OUT OF SCOPE..........................P..................

19.. O P E N................ P................. S..... S............

20.. RESOLVED............ no f urther action planned............

P = primary audit questions S = supporting audit questions

  • = not yet addressed by audit L

9-AUDIT QUESTION MATRIX f[

Pago 2 31 July 1984

. (

ALLEGATION AUDIT AREA NUMBER NUMBER 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

21..OPEN................P.................S..................

22..OPEN........................................*............

23.. RESOLVED............ f urther input requested..............

24..OPEN..................................*..................

25.. RESOLVED..............................*..................

26..OPEN..................................P..................

27.. RE S OLVE D.............................. P..................

28..OPEN..................................P..................

29.. RESOLVED............ no f urther action planned............

30.. RESOLVED....................................;...........:P 31..OPEN....................................................P 32..OUT OF SCOPE.

'.....no further action planned............

33..OPEN.............*...........................P............

34..OPEN..................................P..................

35..OPEN.

......................................P............

36..OPEN....................................................P 37..OPEN................P...................,................

38.. RESOLVED.................................................

l 39.. RESOLVED..............................P..................

40..OPEN..............................................P......

1 P = primary audit questions S = supporting audit questions

  • = not yet addressed by audit L

N AUDIT QUESTION MATRIX o

Paga 3 31 July 1984

.. (

ALLEGATION AUDIT AREA NUMBER NUMBER 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

41..OPEN..................................S...........P......

42..OPEN..................................P..................

43..OPEN..................................P..................

44..OPEN........................................P............

45..OPEN..................................P..................

4.6.. RESOLVED..............................*..................

I 47..OPEN................*....................................

48..OPEN..................................S.................P 49..OPEN..................................P..................

50..OUT OF SCOPE......................................P......

5,1.. O P,EN.................................. P........... S......

52..OPEN..............................................P......

53..OUT OF SCOPE................................P............

5 4.. O U T O F SC O P E........ *....................... *............

5,5..OPEN................*...................................S 56..OUT OF SCOPE.............................................

57..OPZN................*....................................

i 58..OPEN..................................*..................

1 5 9.. O UT O F SCO P E........ *....................................

6 0.. O UT O F SC O P E........ *....................... P............

P = primary audit questions S = supporting audit questions

  • = not yet addressed by audit P

\\

I

.I I

b. r(- [Gda)DE
  • 9 *IT% CIA [

To: g g f.p$'f.

~

.h 2s44 ;, sour 4aa a

m +g i

h h kl ag 1-July 1

b L

iM;

%Q t op. 4 hphl AY.r? NATION

't' ADDIT ARPA M3MBER i

- NUMBER I

.I

. II III IV V

VI VII i

1 i

0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 l

2.0 2.0 7.0 2.0 i

3.0 j

1

$.0

7. 0 l

8.0 9.0 2

10.0 29.0 22.0 3

. 8. 0 9.0 4.0 1.0

2. 0-j 3.0

.c 4.0 i

5.0 6.0 i

5 6

11.0 7

7.0 1.0 i

1 2.0 8

9 i

10 3.0 3.0 12.0 l

4.0 13.0 5.0 6.0 11

.23.0 a

..............................o.......................a.......................................s....

12 5 09

., 3. 0

.i 14.0

'I t ;. *? 'O

5 c.

n 3

(

.i-AUDIT' QUESTION MATRIK i

f Page 2 - 31 July 1984 PAGE.2. eF 4 ALLEGATION AUDIT AREA NDMBER MUMBER I

II III IV V

VI VII t

13 24.0 14 i

4 15.0 j

15 7,.0 4.0

,1 j

16 i

17 5.0 1

6.0

.I

....................................s...............................................................

i 18 7.0 5

is 4.0 8.0 2.0 i.

5.0 3.0 4-.............................

20 21 8.0 30.0

~

~ ~ ~-

22 o

23

......s........................................t...........................

24 g

j 25 r

d

(

26 m

10.0

.,i

.t'.

1 27 i,0.'

10.0 l

7..................

4 29

. 4,. c 1

i 16.0 X.

j

?,

jl j

/ 30 5.

.z,.

.:1, ;/,

t t

I 000.

I V

790.

112.

n~ !i i-4 F

I

.0

. 0 e

V

. 6

.S 3

S G.

0 Sv 0

000.

. 0.

568.

. 9.

.1

=

0

.000.

. 00.

.0

. 000

.0 y

I.

. 234.

.56.

.7

. 890.

. 2.

112i.1 2. 2.

.1 X4

.111.

.11 I8 R9 T1 A

My R l

E Nu BI

.f OJ MI I

UI i

T1 N

S3 E

A 0

P

%.p R

. /.

s

>t 3

A T

Ie T

Dg I Ua DI AP UI

,A 0.

I

.m'c,;a '-

.6 j.'* -.

N O

.::i I

I T

Au y

G Em Ln

. 8. 9

.0

.1

.2

.3

. 4 Lr 1

. 2

. 4

. 5

.6 7

Ai 3

. 3

- 3

. 3

.3 3. 3. 3

.4

. 4

.4

. 4. 4 a

.l!

- iHtu i

L 0 <

I,i 1

<I pt

i1<

Iil1;<1 j

1<1i{:iJ!J 1i

p.

g

.g

  • J

..m :'

.--f-i

+

r.

ADDIT QUESTION MATRIZ

~

Page 4 - 31 July 1984

%GG 4 ef 4

.\\

ALLEGATION AUDIT AREA MN m MDMBER I

II III IV V

VI VII a

45 24.0 46 47 25.0 21.0 48 24.0 49 26.0 g................................................................................................

i

........................................r..........................................................

27.0

8. 0 51 28.0 52 7.0 11.0 53 54

..................................................................................................N 18.0 SS s

S6 57 58 V.

-j[

59 a f i

12.0 60 0

s

...j.....

r+ :

r..-

. v.s s c.

3

-p. f. :,a,, h,,j y

pM

,g

.+

.gk..*.

M.P%^.Q.. '

.a

.jn$ @ llN@ W m r

n p

tv BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 01 - CONCERNING 01 11S/1201/118 OR 11/1201 DBA

/ lg g

  • g *g g i

g ALLOWED BY CCP-40 PARA 4.3.1.2, BUT NOT DBA TESTED PER IMPERIAL LETTER VBR-7697 DATED 8 MAY 78 8

3

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

f

1. EVALUATE AND CHECK AREA FIGURES TROM LICENSEE.

S

2. CONFIRM INCLUSION IN EXEMPTION LOG.

3.

~

m BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 02 - CONCERNING 02 REPAIR SEQUENCING EX: NCR C83-01752 6/23/83 q

--- ACTION ITEMS:---

1. EVALUATE TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION BY LICENSEE.
2. REVIEW AND CHECK AREA FIGURES FROM LICENSES.
3. VERIFY AREAS ARE ENTERED IN EXEMPTION LOG.

q O

tNtfCPSES TRT AttEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALtEGATION NUMBER 03 - CONCERNING 03 305 OvER OTnER MrGR'S EeOxY DBA PERMITTED PER DCA 17, 142, REV. 2, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

S.

1. REVIEW USE OF EXEMPTION IOG.
2. VERIFY WESTINGHOUSE COATINGS ARE IN LOG OR DBAED.

3

3. IF DBA'ED ETC-AUDIT COATING RECORDS & OTHER MANF q

~

f, ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 03 - CONCERNING 03A305 OVER OTHER MFGR'S EPOXY DBA PERMITTED PER DCA 17, 142, REV. 2, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

2.

3.

m m

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 04 - CONCERNING 04 1201 OVER CZ-11 DBA PERMITTED BY DCA 12,374, REV. 1, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY ACCURACY OF AREA FIGURE FROM LICENSEE.

D 2:

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 05 - CONCERNING 05 305 OVER AMERON D-6 DBA PERMITTED BY CCP-30A, REV. 2 PARA 1.3.1, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

m

1. CHECK THICKNESS TESTED VERSUS PROCEDURE.

2.

4 3.

O

s o'

Y r

f

?

E l

l ' ', '..

)

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 06 - CONCERNING. 06 NUTECH 11S OVER FOREIGN OBJECTS DRA.

PERMITTED.BY CCP-40 REV. 5 PARA 4.1.1.3 OVER NAILS, REBAR CHAIRS, WOOD, ETC.,' BUT NOT DBA TESTED

,3

--- ACTION ITEMS --,.

g

1. VERIFY ACCURACY OF AREA FIGURE FROM LICENSEE.

-5 3.

"5

-g BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 07 - CONCERNING CONCRETE COATING REPAIR WON'T FIX CRACKS REPAIR METHOD PER NCR C83-01986 WILL NOT SUCCEED IN REMEDYING CAUSE OF CRACKS AND FLAKING IN COATING

-s

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. PASS ON TO QA / ACTION TO FIX PROCEDURES PER IMPLE
2. VERIFY LICENSEE'S RESPONSE a

-5 3.

a "5

T/

ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMDER 08 - CONCERNING ZINC OVER ZINC RESIDUE ADHESION 9

CCP-30 REV. 11 PARA 4.1.3 ALLOWS THIS BUT ADHESION AND GALVANIC PROTECTION FAILURES WILL RESULT

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

g 2.

D 3.

c ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 09 - CONCERNING THREE COAT SYSTEM OF ZINC DBA og Ol-QP-11. 4. 5 REV. 27 PARA 3.2.4 PERMITS ONLY 2 COATS, BUT 3 COATS HAVE BEEN APPLIED WITH NO DBA

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

2.

'S 3.

S O

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 10 - CONCERNING POWER TOOL SURF. PREP. DBA Q I-Q P-ll. 4. 5, REV. 27 PARA 3.2.2.3 ALLOWS MANY POWER TOOLS - NOT DBA TESTED & DOESN'T GIVE PROFILE

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY NEW PROCEDURE REV. TO SPECIFY PROPER TOOLS
2. INVESTIGATE SIZE OF TOTAL AREA INVOLVED.
3. CHK SAMPLE PANELS-HOW CERTIFIED-RECORDS SHOW TOOLS BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGArzoN nunoLA 11 - CONCERNING PRIMER THICKNESS OF.5 MILS DBA PERMITTED BY DCA 18,489, REV. 1, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY ACCURACY OF AREA FIGURE FROM LICENSEE.

2.

3.

(

s.

r P

A BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)' -. ALLEGATION NUMBER 12 - CONCERNING 102 MIL THICK CDNCRETE COATING DBA jn THIS THICKNESS PERMITTED BY CCP-40, REV. 5, PARA 4.3.1.2, BUT NOT DBA TESTED

-- ACTION.. ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY AREAS ARE PUT IN EXEMPTION LOG.

m

2. EVALUATE / CHECK SIZE OF AREAS INVOLVED.

3.

3 n

m.

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 13 - CONCERNING REACTOR CORE CAVITY COATINGS WILL PAIL i

DUE TO GAMMA AND NEUTRON EXPOSURE, COATINGS WILL NOT SURVIVE LOCA AND DBA RESULTS ARE NOT ADEQUATE S

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY ACCURACY OF AREA FIGURE FROM LICENSEE.

2.

i q

3.

N

)

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 14 - CONCERNING ANYONE CAN CLOSE NCRS/CAN'T tetITE NCRS UNSAT IRS MUST BE WRITTEN AND TRACKING COULD BE LOST

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

).

g

1. REVIEW PROCEDURE REVISIONS.
2. EXAMINE UNSAT IR TRACKING SYSTEM.

CHECK CLOSEOUT.

3

3. EXAMINE SAMPLE QUARTERLY TRENDING OF IRS.

q r

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 15 - CONCERNING CZ-ll OR 191 ON 305 WITHOUT SANDING DBA q

PERMITTED PER CCP-30, REV. 11, PARA 4.4.3.0 WITHOUT SANDING TO MOTTLED TRANSITION, BUT NO DBA TESTS

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. REVIEW PROCEDURES RE: OVERLAPS.

m 2.

3.

S 9

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 16 - CONCERNING COATING DEFECTS DUE TO IMPROPER PRESSURE s

01 HAS WRITTEN VIOLATIONS - HAS IMPROPER PRESSURE CAUSED UNRECORDED HARDWARE DEFICIENCIES?

/

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

2.

)

m 3.

~.

3 ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 17 - CONCERNING INVALID " AIR ACCEPTABILITY TESTS" CIGARETTE FILTERS USED DURING TESTS NOULD INVALIDATE RESULTS AND ALLOW USE OF AIR WITH OIL AND WATER

--- ACTICJi ITEMS ---

9

1. REVIEW FINAL NALKDOWN PROCEDURE FOR CRITERIA.
2. REVIEW RECORDS OF MALKDOWN.
3. WHO'DID IT & WHAT METHOD.

7_.

e

.~,

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 18 - CONCERNING INSPECTORS NOT ALLONED TO ID DEFECTS IDENTIFICATION OF VISUAL DEFECTS NOT PERMITTED DURING BACKFIT INSPECTIONS 3_

1.

ITEMS --

--- ACTION

.m 2.

3.

o o

a R

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 19 - CONCERNING BACKPIT INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS VAGUE QI-QP-11.4-23 AND QI-QP-ll.4-24 ARE VAGUE REGARDING THE METHODS FOR PERFORMING BACKFIT INSPECTIONS q

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

2.

4 m

3.

)

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 20 - CONCERNING NOT CUTTING AROUND DOLLIES

~

CONTRARY TO ADHESION TESTER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS, CUTTING NOT PERFORMED PRIOR TO PULLING

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

2.

3.

g S

n KNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 21 - CONCERNING NO CORRECTION CURVE FOR AD. TESTER CALS.

S DEVIATION CHARTS WERE NEITHER FURNISHED NOR USED IN FIELD

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

m 2.

3.

m BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATIOh DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NMBER 22 - CONCERNING NO ADHESION TESTER TRAINING INSPECTORS REQUIRED TO TAKE READINGS WITHOUT FORMAL TRAINING IN TEST METHOD

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. AUDIT QUALIFICATION / I & T FILES.
2. INTERVIEW QC'S & REVIEW INSTRUCTORS QUALIFICATIONS 3.

m ALLEGATION NUMBER 23 - CONCERNING QC PROGRAM INFERIOR COMPARED.TO OTHERS BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

FOR EXAMPLE ADHESION TAPE TEST NOT ALLOWED

--- ACTION ITEMS ----

1. STAN TO FOLLOW UP TO GET MORE SPECIFICS FR ALLEdER 2.

, *)

3.

A

~

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 24 - CONCERNING COATINGS OVER UNPREPARED SURFACES COATINGS APPLIED OVER RUST AND SCALE INSIDE OF OPEN TUBE STEEL PIPE SUPPORTS

--- ACTION ITEMS --

1. INTERFACE WITH QA RE: IMPROPER USE OF DCA VS. NCR..

m

2. VERIFY ACCURACY OF AREA FIGURE FROM LICENSEE.

3.

3 m

=

9 BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 25 - CONCERNING ACCEPTANCE OF UNACCEPTABLE SEAL COAT 3

OUTSIDE SKIMMER PUMP ROOM IN UNIT 1 ON LINER PLATE SEAL COAT HAD STAINS BUT WAS ACCEPTED q

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. REVIEW INSPEC REPORTS & VERIFY AREA WAS REWORKED.

2.

i 3

3.

S BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 26 - CONCERNING DCAS NOT CONTROLLED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

S

1. REVIEW DCA DISTRIBUTION RECORDS.
2. REVIEW DCA PROCEDURE.

3.

.s c

ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 27 - CONCERNING DCAS ORIGINATED AND APPROVED BY ENOR.

S QA/QC HAS NO INPUT INTO THE REVIEW AND APPRC"AL CYCLE

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. REVIEb3 DCAS TO FIND IF QA/QC REQ'TS WERE AFFECTED.

q 2.

3.

3 BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 28 - CONCERNING DCAS USED INSTEAD OF NCRS APPROX 40% OF DCAS ARE USED TO ADDRESS ISSUES FOR WHICH NCRS SHOULD HAVE DEEN WRITTEN

^

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

l. REVIEW DCA PROCEDURES.
2. REVIEW ISSUED DCAS FOR SCOPE AND CONTENT,

+

3. LETS SEE (1983) CAT REPORT REFERRED TO IN RESPONSE

^

3 BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 29 - CONCERNING DCAS WRITTEN TO OVERCOME PROBLEMS I.E. DCAS WRITTEN TO FACILITATE SCHEDULE EVEN IF THIS MEANS NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURES

-- ACTION ITEMS ---

3 2.

A 3.

r'

7 ALLEGATION NUMBER 30 - CONCERNING DCAS ISSUED TO DOWNGRADE AS-31 TO AS-30 BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) g

/

EG SP-10 CHARGED TO SP-6 SURF. PREP. DOWNGRADES SAFETY TO NON-SAFETY

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY THESE AREAS ARE ON EXEMPTION IOG.

m

)

2.

3.

m N

ALLEGATION NUMBER 31 - CONCERNING SP-6 INTERPRETED AS "BEST EFFORTS" BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

MANAGEMENT TOLD INSPECTORS

  • IF YOU CANNOT GET TO AN AREA, DO NOT WORRY ABOUT IT."

N

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. VERIFY ENTRY ON EXEMPTION LOG OR NOT COATED LOG..

q 2.

3.

9 9

)

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 32 - CONCERNING READING LIST INFO CHANGED AFTER SIGNING

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

S 1.

2.

3.

m-q 4

~

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 33 - CONCERNING LEAD INSPECTOR K - LACK OF EXPERIENCE EG: K IDENTIFIED RUST AS D THIS INFXPERIENCE CAUSED MANY OF THE COATING PROBLEMS

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. AUDIT I&T RECORDS.
2. EVALUATE RATIOS OF I'S II'S AND III'S PAST & NOW.
3. DID QC LEVEL I'S SUPERVISE 7 CONTRARY N45.2.6 3

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 34 - CONCERNING N45.2.2 NOT MET FOR MATERIAL STORAGE

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. INTERVIEW PERSONNEL. REVIEW STORAGE RECORDS.
2. REVIEW PROCEDURE,

)

3. DETERMINE IF COMPLIANCE WITH N45.2.2 IS REQ'D.

3 BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 35 - CONCERNING WORKMANS!!!P AND PAINTER IET & QUALS.

POOR WORK -QUALITY AND DOCUMENTATION REQ'T5 NOT MET FOR PAINTER QUALIFICATIONS AND IN-PROCESS WORK

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. MORE COMPLETE AUDIT OF PAINTEH QUAI. FII.ES/l 70 dilK 2.

e 1.

-y.

/,

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)' - ~ ALLEGATION NUNSER 36 - CONCERE&WG MAT'L TRACEASILITT NDT ALWAYS MAINTAINED q

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

g

1. REVIEW MATERIAL CERTIFICATIONS FROM ETART OF JOS.

4

.2. REVIEW MATERIAL PURCHASES FROM START OF JOS #

3. AUDIT CURRENT USE OF COATING MATERIALS' LOG.

7 3 2

l S

1

h 4

p-)

S

=y e

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUM8ER 37 - CONCERNING BACRFIT RECORDS {I5 CORRECT AND IMPROPER OSAT* PRIMER AREAS NAD 10 MILS, OR DOC. MAPS ARE MtONG, FORGERIES, ACCEPTANCE,WMuGUT INSPECTION p

q

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. AUDIT MAPS OF BACKFIT PROGRAM.

- t f

2. REVIEW STATISTICAL ANAI. ISIS AND IMPACT.

E' '.

a q.-

)

3.

5 3

'i

%i i

9 s

h BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 38 - CONCERNING HIGH DFT CZ-ll GROUND TO ACCEPTABLE DFT THIS NOULD POLISH ZINC AND CAUSE POOR TOPCOAT ADHESION

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

S 2.

h l-

-f 1't R

y I?

~

.I.

SNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATICN DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 39 3 CONCERNING TOPCOATING OLD 305 - SURFACE PREPARATION q

PHENOLINE 305 (1 AND 2 YEARS OLD) BEING TOPCOATED WITN 305 ATTER SOLVENT WIPE ONLY 4

0

- 4 4CTCON ITEMS - -

1. VERIFY THIS PRACTICE PROCEDURALLY ADDRESSED 3 q
2. WHAT SOLVENT WILL BE USED?

3.

T t

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 40 - CONCERNING CLEANING PONER TOOLED SURFACES BRUSHING OR VACUUMING NOT PERFORMED - INSTEAD BLOW DOWN WITH (MAYBE DIRTY) AIR AND RAG WIPE (LINT)

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. INTERVIEW PEOPLE 10 VERIFY METHOD ACTUALLY USED.

2.

o r

)

3.

I j

c

?

?

h s

o t

)

SML/CPSES T4T ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - prt m ? ION NUMBER 41.- CONCERNING SOLVENT WIPING WITN FOREIGN CLEANER l

NOSPITAL DISINFECTANT WITH 24 CHIDRIDES USED TO WIPE PAINTED SURFACES PRIOR 20 REPAIRS

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

q

1. INTERVIEW PERSONNEL TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF USE.
2. INTERFACE WITN OTHER GROUPS REGARDING STAINLESS.

i

)

  • b,
3. REVIEW NCR 8('-R1-01694 F

t 9

I O

O g

I BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

ALLEGATION NUMBER 42 - CONCERNING RICHMOND INSERTS - FOAM AND DUCT TAPE e3 FOAM AND DUCT TAPE ON RICHMOND INSERTS MLS OVERCOATED WITH 115 AND 1201 AND REMAINS BENEATH COATINGS

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

2.

3.

W 9

[NL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 43 - CONCERNING CZ-ll NOT CURED FRIOR 'IO TUPCOATING PROCEDURES NOT FOLLOWED TO DETERMINE IF CZ-ll WAS PROPERLY CURED

-- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. REVIEW RESPONSE AND EVALUATE IMPACT ON HARDWARE.
2. IS CURE CHECK RECORDED ON IRS?

e5

3. WERE AMBIENT CONDITIONS RECORDED DURING CURE 7 S

I BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 44 - CONCERNING " NICKLE TEST" NOT PERFORMED PROPERLY I

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

q

1. REVIEW RESPONSE / IN REGARDS TO C. RUSHINGS INSTRU 2.

3 3.

3:

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 45 - CONCERNING NO REINSPECTION OF DEFECT REPAIRS PRODUCTION JOB TYPE FINAL INSPECTION NOT PERFORMED FOR REPAIR AREAS / REPAIRS NEVER REINSPECTED

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

2.

3.

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 46 - CONCERNING RUST AND FILTH OBSERVED DURING TOOKES I

CONTAMINATES ON SUBSTRATE BENEATH PAINT WERE OBSERVED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF TOOKE GAUGE TESTS

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. TAKE TOOKE IN AREAS DESCRIBED BY ALLEGER?

0

2. INTERVIEW OTHERS TO CONFIRM.

+

3.

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 47 - CONCERNING 25 ELCOMETER ADHESION TESTS ON HANGER m

I:*SPECTORS WERE INSTRUCTED TO PERFORM 25 TESTS - CONTRARY TO PROCEDURES

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

g

1. VERIFY LICENSEE'S RESPONSE BY REVIEWING RECORDS.
2. GET MORE DETAIL FROM ALLEGER RF.: SPECIFIC EXAMPLES 3.

e L

7, b

BNL/CPSES TRT' ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) '

LALLEGATION IIUMBER 48 - CONCERNING COATINGS APPLIED OVER SEISMIC JOINTS.

9 COATINGS WERE APPLIED OVER SEISMIC JOINTS WHICH WERE FILLED WITH FOAM AND WERE NOT TO BE COATED

--- ACTIN ITEMS ---

1.-INVESTIGATE IF THIS WAS CONTRARY TO PROCEDURE.

'q

2. REVIEW PROCEDURES ON THIS SUBJECT.
3. VERIFY INCLUSION IN EXEMPTION LOG SQ FT FIGURES.

9

.R ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 49 - CONCERNING OVERSPRAY ALLOWED AND COMMONPLACE d

OVERSPRAY WAS ALLOWED INTO AREAS THAT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED - THIS IS COMMON q

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

'l. CONFIRM LICENSEE'S RESPONSE VIA INTERVIEWS.

2. REVIEW IRS RE: OVERSPRAY IDENTIFICATION / REMOVAL.!

q

=

3.

?

m,

)

ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 50 -CONCERNINGCOATINGSAPPLIEDWITHOUTQCINSPECTkON

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

3 q

/

1. REVIEW NCRS AND IRS REFERRED TO IN RESPONSE.
2. INTERFACE WITH OI TO PURSUE TECHNICAL DETAILS.

3.

- w m

g

.,/

e, w

ENL/CPSES TRT LLLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 51 - CONCERNING PHENOLINE 305 50/50 MIX WITH THINNER S

THIS THINNING SYSTEM CAUSED THE COATING TO BECOME BRITTLE AND LOSE IMPACT AND ABRASION RESISTANCE

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1.

S 2.

3.

m

,l

^

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 52 - CONCERNING COATINGS ON CONCRETE WITH NO SURF. PREP.

)

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. REVIEW NCRS AND IRS REFERRED TO_JN RESPONSE.
2. RANDOM AUDIT CONC-CURF-PREP RECORDS (SINCE 1981)

)

3. INTERVIEWS TO CONFIRM.

n

~,

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 53 - CONCERNING QC INSPECTORS NOT TO WRITE RFICS QC INSPECTORS WERE NOT TO NRITE REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

e a

1.'. REVIEW TRAINING RECORDS /USE OF JOBSITE FORMS RFIC?

2,.-INTERVIEWS TO CONFIRM RESPONSE..

.s r-e

~

,.~

. s.

b BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 54 - CONCERNING DURING BACRFIT ONLY 1ST UNSAT RECORDED s

_3 ONLY THE FIRST UNSATISFACTORY READING NAS RECORDED EVEN THOUGH OTHERS WERE HIGHER OR LONER

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

,)

. REVIEW BACKFIT REPORTS TO CONFIRM RESPONSE.

3.

~

g ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 55 - CONCERNING REPAIRS NOT PERFORM 5D FOR BACKFIT UNSATS.

AREAS IDENTIFIED BY BACKFIT PROGRAM AS OUT OF RANGE, WERE NOT REMOVED AS REQUIRED s

r

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

j

1. REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING / RECORDING'-JNSPEC 2.

3.

m g

- O CNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 56 - CONCERNING ORIGINAL BACKFIT DOCUMENTS DESTROYED ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION RELATED TO THE BACKFIT FROGRAM WAS DESTROYED BY QC MANAGEMENT

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

ib m

1. INTERFACE WITH OI FOR TECHNICAL MATTERS.

2.

3.

ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 57 - CONCERNING UNIT 2, EL 860 COATING OVER FILTH

,g IN ROOM DIRECTLY OFF ELEVATOR COATINGS WERE APPLIED GVER VARIOUS UNSUITABLE FOREIGN MATTER

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. INDEPENDENTLY CHECK AREA & RECORDS IN BOTH UNITS.

1.

-~

2.

2 3.

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 58. - CONCERNING OC INSPECTIONS WITH INADEQUATE LIGitT PER QI-P-ll.4-1 DEFINES ADEQUATE LIGHTING AS THE MINIMUM FROM A 2 CELL FLASilLIGHT

' b>

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

1. INTERFACE WITl! OI ON TECilNICAL MATTERS.

2.

, I 3.

ENL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2) - ALLEGATION NUMBER 59 - CONCERNING ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSTANDARD COATINGS ON LINER PLATE ABOVE & BELOW POLAR CRANE RAIL AZ 270 TO O

--- ACTION ITEMS ---

g

1. REVIEW ORIGINAL RECORDS FOR THF. AREA IN QUESTION.

2 1.

~

n

,u..

W A

BNL/CPSES TRT ALLEGATION DATA FILE (L2)

O -

SELECTIVE ASSIGNMENTS NERE USED TO ASSURE THAT COATINGS NOULD PASS INSPECTION-ALLEGATION NUMBER 60

- ALSO ONLY l QC SIGNS

--- ACTION ITEMS ----

1 L

2 3

m

=

9 9

f

.- h 9

I m

9 C

m 7

m 9

e 0

  • )

I m

e

.}

e a

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138P508&oldid=4196692"