ML20138P394
| ML20138P394 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1981 |
| From: | BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138M609 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CP-CPM-6.1, NUDOCS 8511070102 | |
| Download: ML20138P394 (12) | |
Text
r
. 'T s & r
~
p BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE EEECTIV
\\ CPSES NUMBER REVISION gg PACC --
\j' JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM 6.1 4 12/22/81 1 of 6 TITLE: ORIGINATOR: _M/M[M /74##
^
PREPARATION & APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES REVIEWED BY: .
_M,. .t2[V[91
& INSTRUCTIONS E C 6/V / " '
TOECyQA DATE APPROVED BY hr/<C -5 y /M*?A/
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MN4AGER DATE O(LN # (
o.i TABLE OF CONTENTS ,
Section Titl e / /
'l
1.0 REFERENCES
2.0 INTRODUCTION
v, 2.1 PURPOSE 2.2 SCOPE 2.3 GENERAL 2.3.1 Format 2.3.2 Organization 2.3.3 Page Format d 2.3.4 Attachments 2.3.5 Accendices 2.3.6 Instructions 2.3.7 t4umbering l 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PREPARATION 3.1.1 Source Documents 3.2 REVIEW 3.3 RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS 3.4 APPROVALS 3.5 EFFECTIVE DATE 3.6 REVISIONS AND DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICES 3.6.1 General 3.6.2 Document Change Notice Preparation 3.7 CONTROL 3.8 HISTORY FILE o.fi ATTACHMENTS l
Figure 1 Document Change Notice Form 8511070102 851016 PDR FOIA CARDE85-59 PDR
r
~...--....=.:...
i i
JOB 35-1195 COMANCHE PEAX STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ,
t' Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 2 i Notice applicable to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195- CP-CPM 6.1 Rev. 4 .
This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Please replace the following with the attached:
page 3 of 6. <
Reviewed by:
Z-21ff a, -l 2. - /.5 - 8SA Mgi :ator Date Grown & Root Quality Assurance Date h/f Ju .9-14-P/
f.ourcnd b/ : ProjectWeidingEngineer Date
~
f
. 0 S J M 10/4/ 2.-/4~ Y $ 02/14/84 Construction Project Manager Date Effective Date
.e
~~
i AKMO
- E,0,'*5Nbb JOB 35-1195 . cam Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Sheet 1 of 2 Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1 "I
This notice applies to Construe fon Procedure No. 35-1195- Revision .
This change will be incorporated in the next revisien of the procedure.
Change the precedure as follows:
Replace the following page with the attached:
Page 5 of 6 4
l l
Reason for change: Change in requirements This change approved by: Reviewed by:
_ ///JW A
' ~I ginator Date Bro Root Qua ity Assurance Date R iew ~--
' ;// f/
Rwi m d by' .
b :/ .
. TUGC0 QualitWAssurance Dace
& 1 93* '2 ,'?-?2 ' 2l3l82 l
Construct 1cn Project Mahager Cate Effective Date
I PROCEDURE ,
i EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION i DATE PAGE CPSES -
1 JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM 6.1 l 4 ,
12/22/81 l 2 of 6
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix 8 1.2 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) N45.2 1.3 CPSES Safety Analysis Report 1.4 B&R QA Manual
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to describe methods for pre paring, reviewing, approving, changing, revising, controllin ,
and implementing Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES Brown & Root (B&R) Construction jobsite procedures, appendices, and instructions. l-2.2 SCOPE This procedure provides instructions and requirements for those activities identified in Section 2.1. This is to ensure that the B&R Construction jobsite procedures, appendices, and instruc-tions are uniform, consistent, and in agreement with associated or interfacing documents and that they comply with the require-ments of the Quality Assurance Program, the Code, or standard l commitments contained in the CPSES Safety Analysis Report.
2.3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2.3.1 Format 2.3.1.1 Procedures, instructions, and appendices, henceforth referred to as construction documents, should be prepared in a format that is consistent with the one used in this procedure. Procedures should l comply with Paragraph 2.3.2 which discusses procedure organization; instructions and appendices, should be similarly arranged.
2.3.1.2 Construction documents should be prepared using the paragraph decimal numbering system in a " block" format. Section headings (e.g. 1.0, 2.0, 3.0) should be capital letters and underlined.
Main paragraph headings (e.g. 1.1,1.2,1.3) should be in capi-tal letters without an underline. Subparagraph headings (e.g.
1.1.1,1.1.2) should be with initial capitals and lower-cased letters with the entire heading underlined. Items in a series or list should be introduced by a word, phrase, or sentence ending with a colon. Items in the listing should be numbered or lettered sequentially.
~
F PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE !
CPSES JCB 35-1195 ;
I CP-CPM 6.1 4 12/22/81 3 of 6 e 2.3.2 Organization Each construction document should have the following parts: ,
l
- 1. Title Page
- 2. Table of Contents which should include a list of attach-ments, appendices, supplements, etc.
- 3. Introduction section defining the scope of the procedure.
4 Procedure describing the work activity or process.
2.3.3 Pa ge Fo rma t The format of the title strip at the top of the page as it appears in this procedure is mandatory for all pages of con-struction documents. The page number block, "1 of ,
2 of , etc.", shall account for all of the pages.
Attach =ents may be included in the page count, or may be numbered individually. l 2.3.4 Attachments 2.3.4.1 Figures, tables, pictures, etc. used to support or illustrate the document shall be on a page as described in Paragraph 2.3.3.
Attach =ents should be numbered sequentially as attachments.
2.3.4.2 other procedures, instructions, manufacturer's manuals, etc.
may be used to supplement a document. These may be labeled as attachments or supplements to the document and shall be included into the procedure as discussed in Paragraph 2.3.4.1.
2.3.5 Ap pendice s Appendices shall be written only to support or supplement a governing procedure, and shall carry the governing procedure's number plus an alpha designator (example 6.1A).
2.3.6 Instructions When specisi instructions are requfred to accomplish an activity, an Instruution may be prepared. Tnese instructions should be prepared in' a format that best suits the communication need.
Instructions shall comply with all of the other requirements of this procedure.
NOTE: Consideration should always be given to the use of the Operation Traveler (CP-CPM 6.3) instead of preparing documents for unique activities (example setting of the Reactor Pressure Vessel). -
CP-CPM 6.1 Rev 4 DCN #2 02/14/84 Sheet 2 of 2 L..___ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ __m_______________.-______.________-._______.___.-_.____._.__.__m___ _ . . _ _ __m._ ____ _.____._w
r FROCEDURE !
BROWN & ROOT INC. NUMBER ,' REVISION l EFFECTIVE DATE ,
PAGE CPSES 1
JOB 35-1195 -
CP-CPM 6.1 l 4 ,
12/22/81 f 4 of 6 2.3.7 Numbering .
It is the responsibility of the Procedures and Reports coor-dinator to assign numbers to these documents which is consistent with the existing numbering sequences.
3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PREPARATION 3.1.1 Source Documents Documents shall be prepared to include the applicable require-ments of the following:
- 1. CPSES Safety Analysis Report.
- 2. Applicable specifications and drawings.
- 3. Applicable codes and standards.
- 4. Applicable vendor data.
- 5. The B&R Quality Assurance Manual (ASME-related activities only).
- 6. Interfacing procedures, instructions, and appendices.
3.1.2 The document shall be prepared to provide explicit instructions on how to accomplish an activity, and shall provide the appro-priate quantitative or qualitative criteria from the documents discussed in Paragraph 3.1.1. The document shall also reference or provide the necessary forms or checklists to be completed by the personnel accomplishing the activity.
3.2 REVIEW Occuments shall be reviewed by individuals other than the originator. The reviewer shall ensure that the criteria dis-cussed in Paragraph 3.1.1 have been included, and that the docu-ments are clear and do not conflict with interfacing / governing documents.
3.3 RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS Review should be conducted by those organizations affected by the document. Resolution of the review coments shall be accomplished, preferably, by the originator.
i i
I
=-
1 i
T I
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE
. BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES i
JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM 6.1 4 12/22/81 5 of 6 3.4 APPROVALS ,
Procedures, instructions and appendices shall be approved by the BAR Construction Project Pianager or his designee. In addition. l ASME-related documents shall lave the review signature of the B&R Site QA Manager, while non-AS'1E related documents will have the review signature of the TUGC0 QA reoresentative. Documents affect-ing both ASME and non-ASME related activities shall be approved by both the BAR Site QA Manager and a TUGC0 QA representative.
3.5 EFFECTIVE DATE Unless otherwise stated in the document, the effective date will be the date the document was apprJved by the B&R Construction Project Pfanager.
3.6 REVISIONS A'4D DOCUMENT CHA!lGE NOTICES 3.6.1 General Revisions and Document Change Notices shall be prepared, reviewed, and aoproved in the same manner as the original document.
3.6.2 Document Change Notice Preparation Document Change 'lotices (DCf!'s) may tie issued instead of document revisions for the purpose of expediency. OCil's shall be numbered sequentially against the revision of the governing document and shall be prepared on a DC*l form as shown in Attachment 1.
NOTE: No more than 6 DC!4's shall be prepared against a document.
When revising any procedure or instruction, all outstanding DC?l's shall be incorporated.
3.7 CONTROL Upon obtaining the required approvals, the document shall be sub-mitted to the Document Control Center for distribution in accordance with the DCC procedures.
3.8 HISTORY FILE The OCC shall naintain a history file on each construction pro-cedure, instruction, and appendix. This file will contain record cooies of these documents, as well as the associated revisions and change notices.
CPM 6.1 Rev. 4 DCN # 1 2/3/82 Sheet 2 of 2
PROCEDURE I EFFECTfVE BROWN & ROOT, If;C. NUMBER ! REVISION ! OATE ,
PAGE CPSES J08 35-1195 -
l ; i 6 of 6
~
CP-CPM 6.1 ,' 4 i 12/22/81 j FIGURE 1 DOCUMENT CHANGE N0f!CE FORM (Reduced for Illustration) ,
JCB 35 1195 l Comanche Peak Stees Electric Station Construction Peocedure DOC'. MENT CM%E 4TICE MER
[
this nctice ecolies to Constr.ctten Procedure No. 3$.1135 Revis ten '
This change will te incarscrited in the rest revision of tne procedure.
Caerge the procoeure as folle=s:
[
l '
F t
f I
)
P Reason for changer r
This cheege approved by: Reviewed by i grigtnoter ga te grown 4 300% awelity Assarence sete RevieuS4 by!
canstruction Prs;est seneger ate tr'ective sete t I i i'
g, ._
M i
\ .
g n
. . ,. s pu .h i l .~- 3 r
e
! gg PLOyp i i
q yx t'
+, p f ..-. ' y? y g +Q9,p rt / 49 -R \ W
,f.v:.: :fjc ,t =,h$ $$k s'k$$k
\ -
. %. - - 1 r f ze,BM -- -
=
4 a H d,.Edi::@ds
=
. :;_ cr2ro,
@i*:P,F"%p e !. .
^
W.
.i ,
, i 3f j. .I .-
2 t- e.
- s 3, &p .
g A .
l t c.eer/Aa. m .;n 9 v' t
%g. .
r2 tre _-
- =- 4.y._q.,
J/ C y , g _., j -
e y- -- -~
h -~ f ,' .
w-- .
E,--- w ;
p I __
- g,$,7, -- ~ %
1 *[ #.-%4 "-
_ ~*__.$ s 7' %
Q Nie wr w h -- Y. q M" %
O
^
~~
~
MW1ye mq
? T '^
$eD v,0 i
\ o6 .-
@e >
g #e .9 4
ak Steam 6*
f 1
0
.i
.---.--.._--.__,,,,,...-.-.--..~-y..- o.-,,_- m v.-..-,_-r.,__-,_,,
. n _. - . -
9 3
CONIANCIIE PEAK l EAST ELECTRIC STATION LESSON NOTES LESSON: Cuality Assurance AUTH: Ceviney / Cole PROGRAM: General Employee Training REV: 09-3210
- 1. ICCFRSO, Appendix B
REFERENCES:
- 2. CPSES Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 17
- 3. ANSI /ANS-3.2-1982
- 4. Cperations Adrinistrative Control and Quality Assurance Plan S. Statien Administration Manual TEXT:
NOTES:
1 1.0 CUA'.!TY ASSUPASCE - lNTRODUCT CN s .s 1.1 Historically, quality assurance as an accepted discipline has been associ-ated with manufacturing and ccnstruc-tien activities from which it origin-ated as a separate functien. It is identified most clearly with systems of checks, audits, inspections, and other forms of verification that can be applied to products during manu-facture or construction, and prior to the product's placement in service.
1.2 The term " quality assurance" is also used to describe the programs, technical discipline, and organiza-ticnal unit established to implement the special procedural steps that are required to verify and document the -
satisfac;ory completion of work. In this centext, the term quality assurance describes a staff support function to assist in the overall
) goal of assuring the high quality performance of equipment, structures, procedures, and personnel.
2 09-8310 ,
, TEXT: (Continuation sheet . even, NOTES:
- e. Corporate Quali:y Assurance Program Manual -
this document establishes general policies and requirements for the quality assurance program to be implem-I ented for all TUGC0 nuclear power plants.
- f. Operations Administrative Con-trol and Cuality Assurance plan - this document provides a detailed description of how the QA program will be implemented at CPSES. It defines the various responsibilities for such things as: station proced-ures and manuals, reviews and audits, equipr:nt control, radiaticn protection, records keeping, and procurement activ-ities, just to mention a few.
- g. Staticn Administration Manual -
I contains the detailed procedures which are generally applicable to every depart.ent and sectier,s.-
Examples wculd be procedures for clearance and safety tagging, centrol cf deficiencies, and maintenance action requests.
- h. Secticn Manuals - contain the specific "how to" procedures and instructions of the respective organizational sections.
5.2 Importance of Procedural Compliance While working at Ccmanche Peak you will be dealing with many procedures. '
You will have procedures for just about every activity you perform.
These procedures are developed for several reasons. One of the major reasons is to provide assurance that a particular activity is consistently performed in a correct manner. Chose procedures are written and approved g by plant personnel and provide the accepted methods for performing work.
An approved activity dces not mean i
. 10 04-8302
I NOTES:
?. TEXT:(Continuation sheet odd) -
i that this procedure is the only method in existence for perforning the activity. However, it does mean it is the only approved method at Ccmanche Peak.
It is extremely important that activities be accomplished in accord-ance with these approved methods and no others.
If during your work you should find problems with procedures or think you have a better method, discuss this with your supervisor, but do net deviate from the approved Precedure.
Procedure change methcds have been established to implement new ideas and improved procedures.
6.0 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTING 6.' Ce ficiency (See Fig. I)
As previcusly defined, deficiencies
' are primarily writte,.wnen precedural violations cccur.. It is everycne's responsibility to report deficiencies that they have kncwledge of.
The detailed precedure for "Ocntrol of Deficiencies" is fcund in the Station Administraticn Manual.
Basically, any station personnel observing a deficient condition shall ccmplete Secticn A of the Deficiency Report Form (DR) and submit the form to the QA Section. The DR is then assigned a number, recorded in the Deficiency Report Log, reviewed by the QA Supervisor, and sent to the responsible Department Superintendent or Section Supervisor for disposi-tion. The responsible Superintendent or Supervisor determines the appro-priate corrective action required to correct the deficiency, records it on the DR, and'the sends the DR back to the QA Section for review and concur-rence. The QA Supervisor signs the QA Concurrence portion of the DR and 11 04-8302
.