ML20138P342
| ML20138P342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 09/12/1979 |
| From: | BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138M609 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CP-CPM-5.1, NUDOCS 8511070071 | |
| Download: ML20138P342 (16) | |
Text
, -
- I
~
ARMS
'lhUtAtu I
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE oAMUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
{
JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 1 of 9 A
n
[- 6 39 j
TITLE:
ORIGINATOR:
wf DATE 8[/7[rN
" FIELD PROCUREMENT REVIEWED BY:
ACTIVITIES" u
QA/
DATE APPROVED BY:
[
_M 9-/7-3
'C0715TRUITTUN PRO T MANAGER DATE PCM4/
CONTENTS
1.0 REFERENCES
.4 2.0 GENERAL
!gdN:..y
'i e r
ce 2.1 PURPOSE s.
COPY 2.2 SCOPE 2.3 RESPONSIBILITY 2.4 SPECIAL ITEMS & OPERATIONS CONWb 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PURCHASING FLOW PATH 3.2 SUBCONTRACT FLOW PATH THIS PROCEDURE REPLACES Ho. 35-1195-GCP-4 and 35-1195-QAP 4.1.
lr
,i I
D_I 8511070071 851016 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR Ef;+4t-ase s c+.+a.h, 7.__.+ A eu.,whMikeu;;235tiL-W&.J.f.#m..,,5.d. r.:Ic..;.
~
- - e _ m ARMS
~
m...ncven I
^'
.n DATL
)
JOB 35-1195 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Construction Procedure DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE NUMBER 1
Sheet 1 of 3 x-This notice applies to Construction Procedure No. 35-1195.CP-CPM 5.IRevision 2 This change will be incorporated in the next revision of the procedure.
Change the procedure as follows:
Replace the following pages with the attached:
Page 7 of 9 Page 9 of 9 0
Reason for change: Clarification of flow path for non "Q" subcontract activities.
This change approved by:
Reviewed by:
$hs7N in
/
/I /;h
/ Date Browy & Root QuaPity Assurance Date Originator
% moruo Q CD -
t $lh F C G Quality Assurance Date
,I'.
Reviewed by:
- f gr, h
[/,
ha,-. $ p/
[ 7< f'C' August 7, 1980 Construction Project Manager Date Eff ective Date d
=
=- -
= -mw._, = m., g suw w s.w.
=
- .-.w.u w t.
~&
r-2 ;_
_;...a
.w l
t r-BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE i
ISSUE
()
CPSES i
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 l
9/12/79 l 2 of 9
1.0 REFERENCES
1.1 Brown & Root Administration Procedures,Section V,
" Purchasing, Expediting & Traffic"
--~
1.2 Brown & Root Power Plant Construction Department,
" Manual for Subcontracting" 1.3 Brown & Root Quality Assurance Manu'al 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE 2.1.1 This procedure provides instructions for those persons in-volved in field procurement. These instructions are intend-ed to assure that proper coordination is maintained with Texas Utilities Services Inc. '(TUSI), Gibbs & Hill (G&H),
Brown & Root, Inc. (B&R) Construction, Purchasing and Quali-ty Assurance (QA) throughout the procurement process.
2.2 SCOPE 2.2.1 This procedure covers all procurement activities initiated by B&R Construction except those Non "Q" items which are valued at less than $100 and which do not have extended delivery dates.
These exceptions will be purchased on a petty cash basis utilizing a B&R field requisition as authorization for payment. From the standpoint of administrative flow charts, all other procurement activities will fall into one of the following four categories:
1.
"Q" Item Purchases - The purchase of an item which is the subject of the Quality Assurance (QA) program as defined in Chapter 17 of the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
2.
Non "Q" Item Purchases - The purchase of an item not subject to QA as defined above (primaril r
materials, tools and equipment.)y conventional construction L
L 3.
Subcontracts - Services procured by B&R from another com-pany or organization. Subcontracts, like purchases, may be categorized "Q" or Non "Q".
(
O w m.=.-:a w -
- _ =
---.e-
--aaw,m =
m.-
mm,w,,,, -
i
~
f I
I 1,
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE ISSUE
)
CPSES i
NUMBER i
REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 3 of 9 4.
Change Orders (in any of the above three categories) -
The administrative flow path for a change order will al-ways be the same as for the original procurament action unless otherwise specified herein, or by supporting special
-~
~
instructions issued to supplement this procedure.
2.3 RESPONSIBILITY 2.3.1 The B&R Construction Project Manager is responsible to assure that this procedure is followed by all disciplines within his organization. The B&R site Quality Assurance Manager is respon-sible to assure that this procedure is followed within his or-ganization.
Initiation of any procurement activity must be ap-proved by the B&R Construction Project Manager or his authorized representative.
In no case shall a "Q" item purchase order be issued without QA concurrence. Deviations from thi' procedure s
as may be required to meet an urgent procurement need are per-mitted only for Non "Q" item purchases and subcontracts, and then only by direction of the B&R Construction Project Manager O..
or his authorized representative.
n 2.3.2 Material Procurement Group (MPG) is responsible for maintaining purchase orders and subcontracts in an up-to-date status in re-lation to specifications and drawings.
2.3.3 Site Purchasing is responsible for filing the Purchase Order and any other pertinent commercial / purchasing data in an organ-ized and systematic sequence for records and retrieval purposes.
2.4 SPECIAL ITEMS AND OPERATIONS 2.4.1 Special Instructions and Quality Instructions detailing the implertentation of this procedure will be provided, where necessary, by the disciplines responsible for the various ac-tivities.
'.s
', y O
swA7.G sw
.- p.
. =.. - ma-- n + --
w
~
~
I BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE ISSUE C)
CPSES NUMBER I
REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 4 of 9 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PURCHASING FLOW PATH 3.1.1 The following steps are performed in the total Purchasing Flow Path as shown in Figure A.
1.
TUSI/G&H issues specifications and drawings that de-scribe permanent material, design criteria, and docu-mentation requirements. These documents must have an issue status, at a minimum, of "For Procurement" be-fore B&R can initiate purchasing procedures. This step does not apply to temporary or miscellaneous ma-terials or services that do not require project speci-fications.
2.
The issues of specifications and drawings referenced in Step 1 are distributed through the Document Control Cen-ter to the responsible B&R Construction Engineer. The Construction Engineer makes a material take-off, states O
the design documentation requirements and indicates wheth-er the material is Safety Related or Non-Safety Related and forwards the information to the Material Procurement Group.
3.
The Material Procurement Group reviews the information package for technical, quality, commercial and source requirements. A material requisition and inquiry delin-eating these requirements is completed and submitted to site QA when the material is nuclear safety related.
4.
Site QA reviews and approves the requisition and inquiry.
5.
Purchasing reviews the inquiry and submitts it to qual-ified bidders on the project final bidders' list for quotations.
6.
The qualified bidders receive the Inquiry package, prepare and submit proposals.
O A
k.,.
- s. s w
-r n
m.
ISSUE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE arvtsto" o^Te e^ot O
cases "u" sea JOB 35-1195 i
j
. CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 5 of 9 7.
Site PurcNasing receives the proposals from the various prospective suppliers and forwards them to MPG for tab-ulation.
l 8.
The Materials Procurement Group prepares the bid tabula-tion, makes a detailed evaluation of the proposals, (with consultation from Construction Engineering when i
applicabis) and indicates recommendation (with QA concur-rance) to ;0wner for approval.
9.
After TUSI approval, the Material Procurement Group Reviews the approval, transmits the complete approved package to j
Site Purchasing. At this point, a Letter of Intent may be prepared, co-signed by the B&R Construction Project Manager and the B&R QA Manager and issued to the sucessful supplier. '
l
- 10. Site Purchasing' prepares a formal Purchase Order.
l
- 11. Site QA reviews and approves the fonnal Purchase Order.
O i
- 12. Site Purchasing transmits the formal Purchase Order to the successful bidder.
i t
- 13. The successful bidder provides acceptance of the order i
by signing the Purchase Order Agreenent.
l 3.1. 2 The Purchase Order Agreement can only be modified by a for-mal Change Order or by a Letter of Instruction to the Vendor.
In both cases, when the order is designated as Safety-Related, l
the changes are approved by Site QA and distribution is made l
in the same manner as the original Purchase Order.
e O
E
- .e w;.m..t..
., =; - -
. =r
~
\\'
BROWN & ROOT, INC.
PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
!l l1 JOB 35-1195 l
j
' CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 6 of 9 i
3.2 SUBCONTRACT FLOW PATH 3.2.1 The following steps are performed, in the total Subcontract Flow Path as shown in Figure B.
1.
TUSI/G&H issues specifications and drawings that describe permanent material, design criteria and documentation re-quirements. These documents must have an issue status, at a minimum, of "For Procurement" before B&R can initiate Sub-contrac'. procedures. This step does not apply to temporary or miscellaneous materials or services that do not require project specifications.
2.
The issues of specifications and drawings referenced.in Step 1 are distributed through the Document Control Center to the responsible B&R Construction Engineer who provides a memorandum to the Site Subcontracts Group requesting that the activity be subcontracted.
3.
The Site Subcontracts Group reviews the activity for tech-0+'
nical, quality, consnercial and source requirements and pre-pares the Inquiry Documents.
~
~
4.
Site QA revlews the package adding Quality Program require-ments and approves the Inquiry.
5.
The Inquiry is submitted to TUSI for approval.
6.
After TUSI approval, the Site Subcontracts Group incor-parates comments and submits the formal Inquiry to Project approved bidders for quotations.
7.
Vendors submit proposals.
8.
The Site Subcontracts Group receives and reviews the proposals, prepares a bid tabulation and the Letter of Recommendation.
U D
w,,
l PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE l
T CPSES i
.o I
f CP-CPM-5.1 2
9/12/79 7 of 9 9.
Site QA reviews and approves Letter of Recommendation.
- 10. The Letter of Recomendation is subnitted to TUS! for approval.
- 11. After TUSI approval, the Site Subcontracts Group incor-porates any coments and transmits the complete approved package to B&R Houston Subcontracts. At this point, a Letter of Intent may be issued to the successful bidder provided it is co-signed by the B&R Construction Project Manager and by Site QA Manager (for "Q" subcontracts).
[
- 12. The B&R Houston Subcontracts Group prepares the formal Subcontract draf t.
- 13. Site Subcontracts Group reviews the Subcontract draft.
I
- 14. Site QA reviews and approves the Subcontract Draft.
- 15. The Subcontract draft is submitted to TUSI for approval.
- 16. After TUSI approval, B&R. Houston Subcontracts reviews and incorporates comments to the Subcontract draft and transmits the formal Subcontract to the successful Vendor for acceptance.
- 17.
- The cuccessful Vendor signs and accepts the Subcontract Agreement.
3.P. 2 The Subcontract Agreement can only be modified by a formal Change Order, a Supplemental Agreement or by a Letter of In-struction to the Subcontractors. In all cases, when the order is designated as Safety-Related, the changes are approved by Site QA.
3.2.3 For those subcontracts which are "non-Q" per Section 2.2.1.3, steps 4, 9, and 14 may be omitted.
O M"i C(915.1, Revision 2, CNf 1 8/7/80 ~
Sheet 2 of 3 ny:.s~a m um.;c_r naa.cai.,
]
t a',
ji;l
+
t f
(
W W
4 umO focpm gUCm 1
1 ES > m@4 En
- v
~ *
$2mQ NQN5z Q4 m*
NR O
n*us yu,*
~
im wmf ~ $
s oD t%"*
m
=
o n r n-u u*m N
i t
3, g%m s.
d r.e it d
n t r o
it pO it e
m ce c
cs u
R e
Aa r
t O
S
.hc s
DN
)r n
5 u o
E
)
1P C
V 6
e d
ht d
d r
e ny a
s r
ar n
l, w
a ite y
i oe
,r eh d
b eurt v ero rc mr 9
vqo vof ar sO.
d G1 onf nd d
pu n r e
1 ri oe
- l. n&
eP aeo 5
p til re r
rsd d.
mr E
ptstf '
.e V w G.
Pl.
T an e
o t
f Al eal eP ar
.h e miM cV t
r 5 s R Q qN,,. o v
. me O
autlqoe'
)rd
)r i
e R
.h
) ceuu reo 2or 4 uo m
p t
f rt 1fO 1Pt o
b.
P e
e l
t ee ye y
a v a
ts mo e
- r m
b o
lae e
s l a v
t s
5 s
i rd ut a
1 e
2 pn be h
l pa al n c
d, n
e a
T o
r e
i I o It n
ei u
t l
a do dvt P
.N A
i Srd e
it I
t nl ioa s
al m.
9n pn v
o 9
f
.i Q
ws upe o
o v'ry leam r
e 8d ei.
sro p
o l
m p
b 6
n
.e E
iu n
i y
,,i 4 o 3
RDi Eeoc A.
a 4
lt
.i ee l
nR l
e
.r m
ea t
u e
I!
4
.*q
.o
)d s
ec 3n O
l d
9
- lno T
4
)n n
)if 3 r t
p ti e
A 8
4II 9te 1O I
e sr ss t
b p
P 8
S sa ee h
sf t s o
e/
So l
ye n
n
.h s
t f
ii a
. o t r f1 r
s G
P l u noe p.
4 e
iiat ld i
S I
qry it er i
e g
r ian I
O ue.
o v
pg s
r t c N
U aq I
ro an p
o su a
r C
T l cu lat p es t
e ft er A
G r
i
,ei t p t a S
t os t e t
ueA eh a
n ed t
c no mr R
N ar q bl l c U
t cun a
r pr n
oc o
t P
N l oI T eo m u e
g it a ne t
as rf oP m i c
nt n
t h
e da c
e al eh s
cdr pn o
r w
C ena lOeo o
R e
ept itt u
l id a
O t ap rI c
re ms P
wl r r
a sg r
l bs r e me o
o au et eaP ard na P
f f
Pa l
vc e
e rc d
el nl lt L
ii pon ak s/s A
i Res Pis p
te h aoa Qi l
er.
rt e Ta s
tiii
" n me s
rt r i
.nt
.bt
)d 1
nece n
l sa l
)oe
) ue II e le at ut,
at 4
haras ha M
3 cs 8sm v
l.
t mt me th y
s c
t f
)
t rt nsi rhg on e
enouv e
f h ecor no t ai a
t n ee t o l rt S
oaanS or t.
lOes P
a G
I oi mll e t..g r
t r R
ri a
nedld n
I emu e
epeei i
l m
scs r(q E
e ust r
r 'q iu
.e GI a
e c
I plp lu u smo oe I
ea I.
c"l cn l
rir f
Pro n
ol oll oi e
i rl oll rg o
)teu l
PATAA Pn m
A
.t E
S 2Id r r r
o o....or f
fsbcd f o df 1.
2 3
t io.
c t
n t
E l
ed ro i
1 i
Sa vtt I
0 0
Pn eei 0
H ot a I
N N
8 es.
red G
uns pl n sog p
e si a Ar m 1_
Itl
. om au o
5
).ica
)bc U
r 0ae T
1fd 1fR O
1 g-
~
j $ h,-l b
l1 l
,ll 1~;l,qggT)1 6q
$t er i ;. 3 l4 l
I
\\'
4 C)
O O
l
/
s
?
j I
'.i i
~7
}
}:1 h
'i
[
'O E
'1
-Q o
- !'j
{3 $j
'en f
w c n g,.
b m
k YCo N
?..
m o
.e g
in 11
- go 1
m d
x 5UKollitMLfLDitfalli P
h.
n E
k i
un musar i
I g
_]U51/G681 Raji (NCINttRING R&R J il.500[0MlhAC15 RSA $111 Ot SURCONTRAC10RJ JteRIOR I). Issue Spect-2). Prepare Inne-3). Review, technical. vaality 4). Review, Approve and o
ficattens and randum re,sesting coenercial, and source add eguality progree n
drawings Sukontrac t, re,strements and prepare re9ste enent s. { v i n,. ir,. A 'a d:;- o j w 5). Approves 6). Interterates comments 7). Satelt I O l and swiselts Impstry to ties. M h@ Inga l,r y.. vewers. I @c cn < s 'I R). Review pro sals, g). Review and approve 1 M .N prepare Sld la lation and tetter of Recommendatten lettar of Eecommemiation 80). Approve ll), transmit cauglete 12). Reviews m i ( ) letter of approved package to and prepares h Recommsendation Growe 8 Rest Sukentracters. formal subcon-I y g, tract. ( k 13). Review draf t of
- 14) Approves draf t of Sekeet rac t.
Sekontrac t. [}} b 15). Approves 16). Reviews 17). Accepts 2 g-centrac t. comments to Sub-draft of Sub-and laterporates Sekontrac t. I contract draf t M and transalts gp [ centract to the the formal 5=b-Q p to gm j rt successfut vender. to ym ( ,1, s -4 m h, E E o q s {j w .g Note #1: Steps 4e 9, and 14 may be omitted for Non "Q" subcontracts per Section 2.2.1.3. i r o .},. il N M g o o m g d' y, a I .)
EdiknA '\\ _ h%M M W @ NAM N E 'k-h Qh BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE CPSES NUMBER i REVISION i DATE PAGE g~ JOB 35-1195 n CP-CPM 5.1 2 9/12/79 7 of 9 9. Site QA reviews and approves Letter of Recommendation. 2 2
- 10. The Letter of Recomendation is submitted to TUSI for approval.
- 11. After.TUSI approval, the Site Subcontracts Group incor-parates any comments and transmits the complete approved package.to B&R Houston Subcontracts. At this point, a Letter of Intent may be issued to the successful bidder provided it is co-signed by the B&R Construction Project Manager and by Site QA Manager.
- 12. The B&R Houston Subcontracts Group prepares the formal Subcontract draft.
- 13. Site Subcontracts Group reviews the Subcontract draft.
- 14. Site QA reviews and approves the Subcontract Draft.
~ {
- 15. The Subcontract draft is sutnitted to TUSI for approval.
- 16. After TUSI approval, B&R Houston Subcontracts reviews and incorporates coments to the Subcontract draft and transmits the formal Subcontract to the successful Vendor 0
Agreement. or acceptance. he successful Vendor signs and accepts the Subcontract 3.2.2 The Subcontract Agreement can only be modified by a formal l Change Order, a Supplemental Agreement or by a Letter of In-struction to the Sbucontractors. In all cases, when the order is designated as Safety-Related, the changes are approved by l Site QA. t, O 1 9
x.. . _ m - --- ... ~ e; e. ut - a s I BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE e-CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE ^ JOB 35-1195 j l CP-CPM-5.1 2 9/12/79 l 9 of 9 FIGURE B i,; 2% I 3
- 3 J
a. 2: as ' a, =; '::J A!! g g. =j 3.]
- 2 gv i
- ar 4
._g 3:3 - -55!O. wo -t j
- 2 @
Ee " 13. ". j " : 3 2 * : C 03 J -o a di..s.:.
- 71. 81281 C
si e TR 5 1* 75 fO
- 3
- J C
g" 50 Om-g e .:g g: s =* .c. .2 =i. m. J 1 h = 2 E 2 b g x
- g l.
- g4 a
8 281 et T21 -28 t.x = u s, -i 1 a x1,
- t H
- ra 1 5 i*. 1 3 3" 518 Et
- ! 2
- g. k j :..t * %* "., a., "I 2E a
g* tr O s . =. - %w*3 0 3, 21* .j aa 2: ag. 23 l OJ = g! i F l J'::. f E= E M
- Et 1**
5 e 4. Q
- b 0:3 I.
b. 5 m ig. e..
- 2 5._
s:r t e; f <*x O I dfi di E3 Ei! l 1 . _3 i + 1 1 j .v-1 I
n.. -n - ~, ~ ~ ~. ~ .v } gfg I ? IM-22388 h0 i I INTEROFFICE MEMO i i TO: T. N. Hood !j
SUBJECT:
Recall of Controlled Documents ~ f I The following documents have been voided and need to be recalled from all controlled copy holders. CI-CPM 5.1-1 Rev. 1 Superceded by CP-EI-5.0-2 CI-CPM 5.1-2 Rev. 1 CI-CPM 5.1-3 Rev. 1 CP-CPM 5.1 --=- Rev. 2 Superceded by CP-EP-5.0 t .( l R. M. Darrin Staff Engineer RfC/lah t I L O =. ~ 'N ' 4' '
- m. % g '
[*4- 'L- "j'--" I I 4 pt
.r 3s.~,y gh N:,.;,.y 3.gcyg s;s.g m ,.<e.ysy3~, g ;.pga y.nz g S m yg ity:;y99.um gp.ysn.n'fEC MQf*Ii/f-JMNc. ;,. .,, fddd N 57,' @ h M M N N M SE
- M $ M M *IF $ % W J 5 M N D W N 3 8 8 M <
~ ' ? ""N,T{Ql;g7ji'y,} L-(ty1Sa M ';2:y? \\ w..a sy.' ["it . $..'T* ), n-t-t*- 4 m u 7, e p, .,a Lt %^. L.f. 55' ' p.;;- w. C 'Q f. 6 :: 1 c.;_:;.g. e... t. , 4.7., W, ',' %. .h , 9. 4 f,.,,",..,, c. h. 2 9 ..a. e , we; r-i f t $.s 8 g., y... Ar.:.. C, 1, t<. 7.,. ; 4 l'a i r' 4' 8 6 N k6' I
'_7 Nh[ NN Y 1 L. TMLT Rsio V Oert3f i INSTRUCSCN !SSUE _ EV:S;CN ?AGs 7/AS UT UtE3 CE.NERA7:NG CC. NUMEEg 3-- j C?SES 0W~ i QI-QP-11.4-5 13 MAR 01 1963 1 of NI PRE?.aRED 5Y:/?:wd!c!/,$ - 2/? y/c l INSPECTION OF STEEL l / /
- E f
SUBSTRATE PRIMER ./ 8 [f eW. 7 y' 7 i REPAIR AND SEAL AND AP CCVED BY: 2 r I FINISH COAT APPLICATION: - / ', yi AND RE N R l " APP CVED BY: 7 ~ l (j
- CE
1.0 REFERENCES
1-A O I-Q P-11. 4-1, " Inspection of Steel Subs tra te Surface Preparation and Primer Applicaticn anc Repair" 1-3 CCP-30, " Coating Steel Substrates Insice Reactor Builcings and Radiation Areas" 1-C CCP-30A, "Ccating Steel Substrates Inside Reactor Buildings and Radiation Areas" 1-0 CP-QP-14 0, "Inspecticn Reports" 1-E QI-QP-11.4-22, "GC Verificatien of Protactive Coating; Unicue Identification Number Verification" 2.0 GENERAL @7f f,(h h 3 k( f M %. ti :
- ,. c ri. c..= :n l-2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 4,h !!%; b kl/ f M 'OI.7m
- b. y.12:0-2 The pu rpose of tilis instruction is to cu tline methces utilized by Cuality Centrol perscnnel in inspection of prime r repair and seal and fini sh ccat apolicaticn and repair.
3.0 INSTRUCTION g, ( 3 p. g,,.,g'.!? 3.1 INSPECTION OF PRIPER 7 3.1.1 dicer Inscections Price to Acolicaticn of Seal or Finisn Coat a) QC shall verify that construction has identified each piece with a unique number in accordance with References 1-A, 1-3 and 1-C. The QC Inspector snall maintain a Protective Coating Unique !centification Number Log, Attachment i for all protective ccatings acplicaticn on all steel designated for use in the Reacter Euilding. Subsequent subdivision of ccating steel in tne field or shcp shall te witnessed by QC in accordance with Reference 1-E. mccc c2 .--.n 1
3, s. .....su q q u. y.y S 5 e INSTRUCTION RESIGN [ ISSUE PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. I 803 'QI-QP-11.4-5 13 ,.g g i g3 2 of 24 i l NOTE: A. Unique number may be assigned to a lot of material to be prime coated at the same time. For example, six pieces steel to be ccated l at same time may all have same unique number. i l B. Liner plate is excluded from QP numbers, f Equipment which is icentified with pemanent plant j identification number neec not be identified witn a F Protective Ccatings unicue identifica:icn number. The h" g t' tem " Equipment" is not to inclace pipe hangers, cable A' %y G They will all have protective Ccating unique i tray hangers, conduit supace:s, or struc: ural steel. l \\". k. ", i icent.ificaticn numcers assigned. l l b) For all prime coated items which co not exnibi; 3 i Protective Coatings Unique !centifica:icn Number (QP l 7 l Number) the Inspector shall perfem an a hesicn (Patch) c 3' Test. If acequate cocumentaticn exists tne above is no: applicable. A calibrated Elcome.ter 106 Adhesten Tester t shall be used to verify that the minimum acceptacle tensile of achesicn to the steel subs:ra:e has been l a tta i ned. Eaca test shall censis of three individual dollies tested to failure. (See Notes 1 and 2 celcw.) Criteria: The minimum acceptable streng n per delly shall be 200 psi. If any cne of :ne three dollies shculd test be10w the minimum acceptable streng"tn, the prime coa: snall :e removed to the steel substrate aver :ne entire item. 4 Prime coated items which are acceptable snall te i stamped with a "QP" numcer by Ccnstruc:icn. The CC i Inspector shall maintain a protective ccatings unicue t identification number log for all protective c:atings applications per this section, i j l l Primer repairs, if requi red, shall be perfor::ed in i accordance with Secticn 3.2. NOTE 1: Any
- item, which due to tneir size i
configuration will not accomoda te testing with an Elecceter 106 Adhesien Tester, snall i not be subject to achesion testing. j i i i f l l-TUGCC CA -
Lct. W.- z.x. :(d.m : M y;pg g,[y 3 : 4 L '..
- J_L
- < ; ;_y. ; ' ~- ~ e t l I l INSTRUCTICN ' AEVIStCN I ISSUE agog i NUMBER CATE l i 7 XAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. i CPSES iQI-GP-ll 4-5 l 12 f.fAR 01 19E; 3 of 3 t NOTE 2: For items witn total exposed surface area of 10 square feet or less - each adhesion test i shall consist of only one dolly tested 'to j failure. I c) Verify the primer has cured required amount of time cer Reference 1-B or 1-C, as applicable. d) Perform a visual inspection of the primed surface in accordance with the following: 1. Runs / sags - A 0FT measurement shall be made di:n the Elecmeter OFT (DFT) gage. Runs / sags 5.5 mils or less tnick anich shcw no evidence of f mudcracking (See NOTE) are acceptable. Refer to References 1-8 and 1-C for repair of runs / sags exceecing 5.5 mils. y NOTE: Mudcracking i's defined as irregular g h cracking as in a dried mud puddle. 5. Y Y ky.,- abrading before overcoating. 2. Dry Scray - Must be removed by screening or -q 3. Over Spray - Must be removed before overcoating. 4. Contamination I 011 and crease - unaccectable Emceccec foreien ?. ate-f al s - unacceptatic Sta ms - rust ' rec; anc cinc oxide (wnite) statqs are acceptable provided loose particles are -emoved prior to appl ica ticn of finisn coat. 5. Skips / damaged areas / gross discontinuities such as nolidays or voids - unacceptable. e) The inspector shall perfora a CFT inspection of the cured primer film. A cal ibra ted 0-25 Elecmeter Inspector 0FT gage Model !!I/IE, or equivalent, shall be used. A minimum of five separate spot measurements (See Note 1) spaced evenly over the structure (See Note 2) snall be taken. Since tne magnetic gage is sensitive to gecmetric discentinuities in the steel, measurements less than 1 inch frcm tne ecge or a hole i shall be avoided-where pcssible. (See Note 3) l i i l. 63q9 %qq Q l -}}