ML20138P255

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 5 to Procedure CP-QP-16.1, Significant Const Deficiencies
ML20138P255
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 07/23/1982
From: Scott B, Tolson R
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138M609 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-QP-16.1, NUDOCS 8511070022
Download: ML20138P255 (6)
v • d • e


Text

___

PROCEDURE REVISICN ISSUE NUMBER '

OATE i PAGE l TEXAS UTILmES GENERATING CC ,

, CMU i l CP-QP-16.1 5 1 of 6 l t ,

i SIGNIFICANT PREPAREDS'Y: [ C6 a;,75 X

CONSTRUCTION ,

i DEFICIENCIES ,

l l APPROVED SY: -

w 7/bl/7

'0 ATE

1.0 REFERENCES

i 1-A Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.55(e) 1-B CP-QP-3.0, CPSES Site Quality Assurance / Quality Control Organization '

2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE i

7 The purpose of this procedure is tg provide a rou tine '

' method for documenting and evaluating significant product l related deficiencies discovered during the construction phase of the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES).

l The procedure includes measures for recognition and identi-l fication of significant deficiencies and a method for eval-uating their significance with the objective of providing ,

prompt notification to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission  !

(NRC) as required by Reference 1-A. ,

2.2 RESPONSIBILITIES The TUGC0 Manager, Quality Assurance, has overall responsi-bility for Quality Assurance activities on CPSES and is ,

i ultimately responsible for evaluating and determining the ,

reportability (to NRC) of significant design and I construction deficiencies within the requirements of Reference 1-A. The TUGC0 Site QA Supervisor is l responsible for recognition and analysis of significant i

construction deficiencies and normally represents the Manager, Quality Assurance, in verbal notification to the j NRC. The principal site QA/QC Staff personnel, as  !

defined in Reference 1-8, are responsible for implementation  !

of this procedure within their functional areas of responsibility. ,

l l CONTROLLED COPY l CONTROL No. ! D 6 L j B511070022 851016 PDR FOIA M85@ _ PDR __ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f i PROCEDURE l  ! ISSUE {

NUMBER l REVISION l' OATE ' PAGE l I TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. '

CPSES lCP-QP-16.1 l 5 f JUL 2 31252 2 of 6 i l i l

, 2.3 DEFINITIONS 2.3.1 Reportable Deficiency As described in Reference 1-A, a reportable deficiency is defined as a deficiency found in design or construction, which, were it to have remained incorrected, could have affected adversely the safety of operation of the Nuclear Power Plant at any time throughout the expected lifetime of the plant, and which represents:

a. A significant breakdown in any portion of the Quality Assurance Program conducted in accordance wi th the requirements of Appendix B; or
b. A significant deficiency in final design as approved and released for construction such that the design does not confom to the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis report or construc. tion permit; or
c. A significant deficiency in construction of, or signi-ficant damage to, a structure, system or component which will require extensive evaluation, extensive redesign, or extensive repair to meet the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis report or construction pemit or to otherwise establish the adequacy of the i structure, system, or component to perfom its intended safety function; or
d. A significant deviation from performance specifications 8 which will require extensive evaluation, extensive  !

redesign, or extensive repair to establish the adequacy of a structure, system, or component to meet the criteria and bases stated in the safety analysis report or construction permit or to otherwise establish the adequacy of the structure, system, or component to perfonn its intended safety function.

2.3.2 Sianificant Construction Deficiencies For purposes of this procedure, significant construction deficiencies are " product" nonconformances which may be reportable in accordance with the above definition. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following types of nonconformances:

I

, , TUGeo CA  !

J j '

i PROCEDURE j REVISION , ISSUE NUMBER j i OATE a PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. ' {

83 CP-QP-16.1 I 5 l 1 I lJUL 2 3 *$22 l 3 of 6 l

l

a. Product failures substantially below specified l acceptance criteria;
b. Apparent product deficiencies or damage to safety-

' related structures, systems or components for which there is no readily obvious routine rework or repair procedure available or specified; i

c. Product deficiencies discovered subsequent to final acceptance by responsible QC personnel;
d. Construction deficiencies which clearly require engineering analysis for resolution;
e. Construction deficiencies which will require further I

testing or evaluation significance in order to detemine the of the nonconformance, including inadequate records.

~

3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 REPORTING Each functional QA/QC Manager / Supervisor shall require personnel under his technical direction ,to promptly verbally report "significant" construction deficiencies as defined herein to his office or in the event of his absence or unavailability, directly to the TUGC0 Site QA Supervisor. If the reported construction deficiency is classified "significant" (See Section 2.3.2) it shall be documented imediately on the Design Construction, Significant Deficiency Analysis Report (SDAR) Form.

Figure 1, and then promptly hand-carried to the TUGC0 t

Site QA Supervisor. Routing procedures for identification and resolution of nonconformances and deficiencies shall then be implemented.

The TUGC0 Site QA Supervisor will complete the Analysis and Conclusion section of the SDAR form although the functional Managers / Supervisors may also participate in i

this effort. The twenty-four hour clock for notification to the NRC may begin when the principal QA/QC Manager / '

Supervisor determines that the construction deficiency .

i is "significant" as defined herein. Consequently, it is '

imperative that the fom be processed in an expeditious t

manner.  ;

i I

l  !

I

, TUGCO oA I

' l PROCEDURE ISSUE I

i NUMBER . REVISION DATE ' PAGE

! TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. l CPSES CP-QP-16.1 5

% 2 3 E2 ! 4 of 6 f

3.2 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION l

The Analysis section of the SDAR form includes direct t quotes from Reference 1-A as well as other items that experience indicates are necessary for considera tion to minimize the reporting of trivia to the NRC, By definition, Reference 1-A only requires the reporting of deficiencies which have adverse safety implication and are significant i.e. "yes" answers to parts 1 and 2 of tne Analysis section of the SDAR Form. It is nonnally impossible to make a timely decision relative to safety aspects and thus the decision to report or not report to the NRC is often based on the significance of the The questions depicted in subsections (a) through deficiency).

(1 of Part 2 are  ;

designed to reach a timely decision on reportability as well as to document the basis for deciding that 'the deficiency is not reportable per the provisions of Reference 1-A, i.e., a "no" answer to the Conclusion section of the SDAR Form. ,

t 3.3 PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION t

l A "yes" answer to the Conclusion section of the SDAR Form l will nonnally result in the following sequence of events: i

a. Verbal notification to the TUGC0 Manager, Quality I Assurance, or his designee, of the nature of the deficiency and the conclusion reached;
b. Verbal notification to the Principal (Resident) NRC j

' Inspector for CPSES or in his absence or availability '

directly to the NRC Region IV office in Arlington. l Texas (817-465-8100). i

c. Completion of the bottom portion of the SDAR Form and distribution to affected personnel, including the TUGC0 Manager, Quality Assurance.

A "no" answer to Parts 1 or 2 of the fann reflects the determination that the deficiency is not reportable per Reference 1-A.

To provide adequate records, record the date and time of the decisions and initial or sign the fann in the space j provided, then distribute and file for future reference.

l i

f ,

3 TUGCo oA

_ -. -=. ._ . . . .. _. . . . _ _ . __ - _ . _ . _ _ _ . __

l l l URE REVISION l NU SER ,

E PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

i 3

I CPSES l  :

1 CP-QP-16.1 l 5 l JUL 2 0 Gi
1 5 of 6 i j >

i i i

i

. .I 3.4 NUMBERING AND FILING  !

I i-A consecutive log of the SDAR forms submitted to the Site

! QA Supervisor is maintained by the TUGC0 Site QA Secretary.

] This log reflects the I. D. Number shown in the upper right hand corner of the fonn, a brief summary of the deficiency, and a notation as to reportability. If reported a unique number is also shown on the log and in the lower right corner of the SDAR form, as follows:

CP-73-7 I

Unique sequential identifier -
Year identified

! Comanche Peak j-Files, including appropriate backup information, are maintained by the TUGC0 Site QA Secretary.

j 3.5 REVIEW OF NONCONFORMANCES -

i j Each ftinctional QA/QC Mana shall review Nonconformance Reports (NCR's)ger/ , in his area Supervisor of responsibility, upon issuance. This review is designed to recognize and identify significant deficiencies as defined in Paragraph 2.3.

i a

j I

I i

r I

i l

f l

TUGCO CA j

,, g g

, _g,,,g ,. , , , , . . , ,, ,,- r-v-,. -,_.-.----.,,,nr. , . , - -

--c. ,--_y_-- ,--.,nm.-mn,.,

.,-----,,aa-,,

I i

PROCEDURE l ISSUE i l i NUMBER ' REVISION i DATE PAGE i TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. '

I  !

CPSES CP-QP-16.1 5 ,.e...

o **-*

s . . . . 6 of 6 FIGURE 1 DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS REPORT I

,,e i

I. i .

e-, . se - ,, e mee.. ;ee ..e L,eu .s, ..

i

  • ='tft :*M *3 18 .:T*.I t ' gr -*t *.Tmak 4. t %3a 88. 5 FTes !i*e
m.u ua:ic.

I

-e** : : . as +- se . .e a*a a se 6 's,e - . ... e . we I

es:3

    • t..t tser* easineersee . sos 96e 6ee ksa4*e ee- et* sf 3.ame seeras ues ee- etee s* er *ectee se
  • 13 :.8 etinere* es-* Joos es t ee .  ; r e.,

hs.ese er er es ta.seev .aesteeres suma ssaea  ; 13

  • a s- eseeu .as s.sss tees . senee s nees s , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • IS O J g
              • k'****** .......................... . . . . . e e ** '11 $ *

. ee ses ser 648 tote scesse s es e stsa , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 13 0 *

.. :.new u ,o. se .*es a . .e we en.e.. .e e.e e.us ..

. ...u eenee.

eneees.ruers..,,..............................* ts ; a

e. ..an wn.e :es a sesee n=e eee .e,w e es . ee. .s e , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ; t2 ; a f

a u.e feud.eav" 4~e esoe Asetest ee , , , , , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 'fl P i e s se : en on e ia se re e ee. 2,-i.e te, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ..: u o

<e, een ees.se eenteest.o..eee.en ,.me . eeeeue ,,,,,,,,,,,,.: ts 0

' se es ess 's6..re se e .se*ee ts t v .stermee ee% erases se eeisesseos .s t*

  • * * * * * * * ' * * * * .....eeo ee.o..e ee.ee........e .....5 *
.e t e6.ses e 'eente ees.se see ees. ese
      • s asemee sort . .ee.e,,,,,,,,,,
  • 13 *,
  • ~e s w ,.

ette.coes toesttee meer !  !** 0 "TI 4 one i .

! t t

. ,e e.ese.e, r .ee , a . .. ,e 4.e e, ees,o,es, i

I p,, u, 3 TUGCOOA

_ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138P255&oldid=2864393"