ML20138P183
| ML20138P183 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1984 |
| From: | Vega A TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138M609 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CP-QP-19.6, NUDOCS 8511060492 | |
| Download: ML20138P183 (3) | |
Text
. -.
PROCEDURE REVISION l ISSUE i
PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO NUMBER i
OATE l
CHU CP-Q P-19. 6 l
7 AUG 0 5 El 1 of 3 i
PREPARED BY
- '!?
/
SURVEILLANCE OF
- E'
~
CONSTRUCTION AND STARTUP/ TURNOVER s
ACTIVITIES
^.~
7
/
CAPPROVED BY:
I.
/M"
/
OATE i
1.0 REFERENCES
~
i 1-A B&R ARE QA Manual
.J
'~2..I
,(
mq _
4 1-B TUGC0 CPSES Quality Assurance Plan 1-C CPSES Section XI Progran Manual f
1-E QI-QP-19.6-1, "CSTS Surveillance Deficiency Reports" 1-F CP-QP-18.0, " Inspection Reports" 1-G CP-QP-17.0, " Corrective Action" i
1-H CP-QP-2.6, " Certification of CSTS Personnel" i
1-I CP-QP-16.0, "Nonconfonnances" 1-J CP-QAP-16.1, " Control of Nonconfonning Itens" i
2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to outline the method used i
by Construction and Startup/ Turnover Surveillance (CSTS) personnel to perform su rveillance of quality rela ted activities to assure compliance to approved instructions, procedures, and/or drmings implementing the requirenents of Reference 1-A,1-B,1-C, and 1-D.
t
%g, N OA l
... -.._,.-.-. ?
- - - - ' - - - ' - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~
PROCEDURE NUMBER REVISION ISSUE PAGE i
OATE i
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES i
- D., n c' r,i; CP-QP-19.6 l
7
"~"
2 of 3 1
l l
2.2 RESPONSIBILITY
{
The TUGC0 QA Manager has overall responsibility for control of quali ty related activities.
The CSTS Supe rvi sor, reporting to the QA Supervi sor is respons ible fo r implementation of this procedure.
1 2.3 DEFINITIONS 1
2.3.1 Nonconfonnances A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quali ty of an item unacceptable or 4
indetenninate.
2.3.2 Deficiency s
A condi tion which viola tes quality assu rance program requirements and requires correct he action.
2.3.3 Concern.
A condition wnich does not violate quality assurance program requirements; however, could be a potential problen or requires some clarification.
t 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 METHODS Surveillance by CSTS shall be perfonned by assigned personnel using detailed checklists prepared from the implementing
~
procedures and approved by the CSTS Supervisor or his designee.
i Assigned surveillance personnel shall verify compliance of the delineated activi ties through observa tion of work activities, discussions with cognizant personnel, and review of objective evidence.
The results of the surveillance activities shall be documented on the checklist for subsequent i
revise by the CSTS Supervisor or his designee.
3.2 REPORTING AND FOLLOWUP A su rveillance report is preparel which includes the following:
1 POf'It PSE 3
- - - +
r
,y.,,
-y
_m--..,_r
-.,,.v.-_-.-
i I
i
! PROCEDURE l REVISION ISSUE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
j DATE PAGE NUMBER i
l CPSES lCP-QP-19.6 l 7
5 3 of 3-i t
a.
Scope b.
Sumna ry Deficiencies (if applicable)
I c.
d.
Concerns (ifapplicable)
Nonconfo nnances identified during surveillance activities shall be documented in accordance with Reference 1-I or 1-J i
as applicable.
Deficiencies identified during suneillance I
activities which require immediate attention shall be i
documented on a Suneillance Deficiency Report in accordance l
with Reference 1-E.
All other descrepancies, including references to reports issued in accordance with References 1-E, 1-I or 1-J, will be documented in the Surveillance Report.
The report is then fomarded to the appropriate CPSES department manager for corrective action as necessary.
A due date for the corrective action response willbe provided based on the severi ty of the di screpancy as detennined by the CSTS Supervisor or his designee.
Follow-up and/or corrective action verification of Surveillance l
Repo rt findings shall be the respons ibili ty of tiie initiator.
NOTE:
When su rveillance activities involve the verification of the physical characteristics of an iten(s), and a pennanent plant recond is desired, the activity shall be documented on an Inspection Report in accordance wi th Reference 1-F.
3.3 FREQUENCY The frequency of surveillance activities shall be in accor-dance with a surveillance schedule prepared by the assigned staff personnel and approved by the CSTS Supenisor.
3.4 CORRECTIVE ACTION The Quality Assurance Supenisor or his designee shall review Surveillance Deficiency Reports for the need for formal corrective action in accordance wi th the provi sions of Reference 1-G.
3.5 FILES Files of completed checklists and Suneillance Reports shall be maintained by CSTS.
i TUGeo CA
_-