Text

Responds to 850320 Memo Re SER Input.Div Will Negotiate QA Branch SER Input Submittal Date W/Licensing Project Manager (Lpm) After Lpm Determines When Applicant Will Respond to Remaining Encl Open QA Items
	ML20136F907
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	04/03/1985
From:	Grimes B; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Novak T; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20136E513	List: ML20136E510; ML20136F232; ML20136F795; ML20136F890; ML20136F896; ML20136F907; ML20137K729; ML20137K738; ML20137K742; ML20137K748; ML20137K804;
References
	FOIA-84-663 NUDOCS 8504100395
	Download: ML20136F907 (76)
	v • d • e

{%2;,.(...

kMi-------" -

~ ^ ~ '

^

~

s

~

' ~ ~

('-

g.

' d..

M, j

UNITED STATES t

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION li i

4

(

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 W \\..,**

1 APR 0 3,1985 ij Docket No. 50-424 c'

and 50-425 p

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Thomas M. Novak Assistant Director for" Licensing Division of Licensing t-Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM :

Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

SER INPUT FOR V0GTLE UNITS 1 AND 2

'{

~,

3

}

This is in response to your March 20, 1985, reminder that the SER input for Vogtle is due to DL by. April 1, 1985.

You indicate that if the April 1 date will not be met, an alternative date should be negotiated with the LPM and followed by,a memo to OL.

(V Our SER input for Vogtle was provided by memorandum of December 27, 1984, with s..,,.

8 several open items.

Generally, these have been resolved, but subsequent FSAR amendments have resulted in additional open items.

On March 22, 1985, our staff reviewer met with the LPM and representatives of the applicant.

At that

.j meeting, the applicant committed to make a submittal before April 1, 1985, which will resolve the currently open items.

1 1

Applicant's letter of March 26, 1985 (File: X7BC35, Log: GN-563) responds acceptability to 1 of the 6 open QA items discussed with the applicant at the March 22, 1985, meeting.

The LPH is following up with the applicant to de.termine when the applicant will submit the remaining information and to also determine when the applicant plans to incorporate its latest nuclear organization into the FSAR. We understand the position of Manager, Nuclear Operations has been abolished, and organizational changes at this level will be reflected in the FSAR and-the SER.

We will negotiate the QAB SER input submittal date with the LPM after the LPM determines when the applicant will respond to the remaining open QA items.

For the record, we have enclosed these items.

..l i

- $K 1

q 8.; 4 } /f4 qq S

= &-

i f-,

M f'~

rian K. Grimes, Director.

Y Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, i,J and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

j

2. 2, Open Items m

m

-m.

,, ;L

....a...---..

(

.:{ '

Thomas M. Novak.

(.3..,

']

Distribution:

j QAB Reacing i

QAVT Reading DCS ij J. M. Taylor, IE

/

R. H. Vollmer, IE B. K. Grimes, IE G. T. Ankrum, IE i

J. L. Milhoan, IE 1

J. G. Spraul IE E. Adensam, ADM M. Miller, NRR

-t. r-

^-

t

[ (g) 4

.h 1

i i

1 o

\\

I a

i b

,.n..

IE':QkVT:QAB A

QAB I

Q AB:C

"'I JGSpraul:ric

.J ilhoan GT1 nkrum es l} *(N 4 04// /85 1

04 g.485.

04 1 /85 04/Z-/85 6

) _.

t

.. N. :.

L.uldOnk b lnal:.2'- L..

i.

(

V0GTLE QA OPEN ITEMS y

Vogtle QA program description is acceptable except for the following items which require clarification / commitment after FSAR Amendment 15 and the changes to the Vogtle RG positions submitted by letters dated March 15 and March 26, 1985i 1.

Clarification 1 cf the Vogtle commitment to RG 1.58 includes the statement on FSAR page 1.9-51 that:.

For nuclear operating personnel, VEGP shall apply the requirements of this guide to quality control inspection personnel; however, for personnel performing calibration, installation checkouts, or routine surveillance, the requirements of this guide shall not apply since, as stated in Section 1.2 of ANSI N45.2.6, the requirements of this guide are optional for these personnel.

t 1

Describe how Vogtle will assure the qualification of personnel performing these functions.

2.

TheVogtlepositiononRG1.94onFSARpagei.9-74referstoFSARparagraph 3.8.3.6.2.C.

FSAR paragraph 3.8.3.6.2.C on page 3.8.3-12 states:

"The extent of compliance with ANSI N45.25-1974 is as follows...." It does not indicate what, if iny, of the regulatory guidance and ANSI N45.2.5-1974 what is.r,ts not being met or what, if anything, is being done instead of standard ecommended.

The Vogtle position needs to be clarified in these respects for the operations phase.

3.

Similarly, the response to the parts of question 260.61-4 indicated below will be acceptable if a commitment is added that independent (QA) audits will be performed to verify that the equipment is present, functional, and calibrated; that there are appropriate procedures, they are being used, and they are working effectively; that involved personnel are adequately trained; etc.

Accident-related meteorolo ical data collection equipment (FSAR pages a.

Q260.61-4 and -4a, part A. ).

j t

b.

Radiation protection systems (including necessary equipment and supplies) (FSAR pages Q260.61-4a, -4b, and -4c, part A.8. A through

. A.8.F).

c.

Plant shielding (FSAR page Q260.61-6, part C.2).

d.

, Iodine monitoring system (FSAR page 260.61-8, part C.18).

4.

The Vogtle response to' question 260.62 is acceptable except as noted, below:

~'a.

The response to part A.2 indicates that the " full strength (sic) rod control system" is shown on sheet 82 of FSAR table 3.2-1.

This is

! b.

true,andKhisresponseisacceptableexceptsheet82shows"N"in l

the Q-Lis't..co.lumn. The "N" should be "Y".

~

9 G

I f

f--"-~~~

.... m

= - ~

l.L :-

~:-.a. a _ h12 - N.MWE. i.? L O :

ai$NO$L4.

.c.-

s b.

The pertinent provisions of the Vogtle QA program should be applied to the material handling equipment identified in parts A.6 and 86,7 of question 260.62.

The responses to parts B.1 th' rough B.5 which refer to responses to c.

questions of the 210 series are not acceptable since, per HEB, the responses'to the referenced 210 questions are unacceptable.

5.

The following comments result from the staff review of the March 15, 1985 letter regarding Vogtle RG positions:.

~

3 a.

FSAR section 13.1.3, referred to 'on page 1.9-19, is being reviewed by-j the Licensee Qualification Branch.

~

b.

Clarification 2 added to the VEGP position regarding RG 1.37 (FSAR page 1.9-36) addresses the composition of expendable consumable materials.

It is not clear how (or even if) the clarification differs from the RG.

Clarify.

The same is true for the clarific tion added at the top of page 1.9-38.

Clarify this also.

FSAR amendment 16, at the bottom of page 1.9-38, defines "important c.

nuclear plant items" as " installed systems required for safe shutdown."

Expand this definition to include systems which prevent accidents or mitigate the consequences of accidents or justify not doing so.

d.

Justify the deletion or replace " Prior to installation, weld end preparations will be inspected for any damage which may have occurred during storage," at the top of FSAR page 1.9-40.

Also, it isn't clear how the use of storage bins would be more suitable protection for weld-end preparations than the use of caps and plugs.

Clarify.

e.

The commitment on FSAR page 1.9-51 to SNT-TC-1A-1980 instead on SNT-TC-1A-1975 is ac:eptable if "shall" is inserted in place of the permissive "should" in accordance with ASME File #NI 83-033.

Clarify.

f.

" Exceptions are as follows," added at the bottom of FSAR page 1.9-86 appears to be inappropriate.

Clarify.

g.

Clarify the revised sentence on FSAR page 1.9-93 which reads:

"A supplier may be considered acceptable to supply a "Q" quality commodity of off the shelf items without a survey."

=

9

.(

l 1

l t

^

~

[

l

w+

e a

9 l

r-11

- pi ll

s,,-

iij1 -!!.gi_

igg an EN" fjli" l!

j{l I

- i iI,

,l.

a 11l ll

'i Lj i!!I 1

liji ~~1-lli i

~

gl iih! !!!

a i

r i

11 sjj l

l l

l a

!l l

i il i

i.

i n.,

li i.

li.l i'

i

- ]I I

I ll I

Ei

~ - -

n.,

I

'(J hn-

~

-.:..s... u i a,7

,g' y q 3-g - - -..~.,

.a.z. u s g c g,,

Date ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP

.3/,2-thf initials Date TO: (Name, office symbol scom number, building. Agency / Post)

1. /hr/F~

hlbram 2.

i hve m e C

. S.

4.

E Note and Retum File

_N Per Conversation.

For Clearance

_ Nseel Prepare Reply For Correction N Requested See Me

) For Your Information

_ Circulate Signature investigate ment I

t I Justify

_ bdination Od8P"' f* V "*

azuAnxs 9

b SER.[$$ fgtle.a as y ec h d e d /*I# Tl % "

Refer ~ e e :

. A s, % ere har hee ^ scw e A t a. % e c h n y severet op w Ec ef=se H.*se.

cap p $.t u f s c f <s~~W Lt'is!.$ +!.e epp tod c ~~ 3 C n m. {"le d $ o vn a k t.

O S u do.es s f fe. l w,%

by sL &,. f

b** S

i harsmy l0$ UJNtr.k (JJ e$$~ C[Cte O l{ h(50 Cf %

8 3

D e L.EF( b4i [c[d/He c 01d ei- [c r O 4.

a f e f't } hb t. $ $ $*

8

$4 be'saf h af byt$Crt CtyftLhaYS hn s,,ya+. She o s b fcfloU) *.Ip u..fl. t eb a ( p l<c 1 ] k e Atycksb % o [b r at b b* b.

b d is4.,

D h a, a na eme fupprovels, concurrences, dis I

M W use fis vorm os 4 [E act Il re10

.T ntgetferv 8

ieerences, and.im.i.e tion.

Room No.- eidg.

FROM: (Neme, org. symbol. Agency / Post)

Ea.'S - 3 1 ?

phone No.

bOC.st.

9AAUS

.t v r30 OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev 7-76) p t-102 P*eeseeed of GSA FPtAR Let CrRJ 10!=11.206 1961 0 331 129 (109) e GPC :

/#%

(a.,,

i

.i i

. m. a c 6

i i

VEGP-ESAR-Q i

f Relative Question Section/

Transmittal Questien Subsection Date Amendment

{}

252.1 4.5.1 May 31, 1984 11 252.2 5.2.3 May 31, 1984 10 252.3 5.2.3 May 31, 1984 9

252.4 5.2.3 May 31, 1984 9

17.2.18 l

kl 260.3 17.2.1 Apr. 30, 1984 l

260.4 13.1.2, 17.2.1 Apr. 30, 1984 260.5 17.2.1 Apr. 30, 1984 260.6 17.2.1 Apr. 30, 1984 260.7 17 2.1, 17.2.2, Apr. 30, 1984 4kj 17.2.18 260.8 1.9 Apr. 30, 1984 pq 260.9 1.9, 17.0 Apr. 30, 1984 BS 260.10 17.2.2 Apr. 30, 1984 k

260.11 17.2.2 Apr. 30, 1984 8.,

260.12 17.2.1 Apr. 30, 1984 8

260.13 13.1.3, 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 p

t 260.14 17.2.3 Apr. 30, 1984 K.

N-260.25 17.2.1, 17.2.2, Apr. 30, 1984 g

17.2.3 r,s 260.16 17.2.3 Apr. 30, 1984 Y

260.17 17.2.3 Apr. 30, 1984 260.18 17.0 Apr. 30, 1984 1

260.19 17.2.3 Apr. 30, 1984 l8n 260.20 17.2.3 Apr. 30, 1984 d

260.21 17.2.4 Apr. 30, 1984 jA 260.22 17.0 Apr. 30, 1984

.8 260.23 17.2.5 Apr. 30, 1984

'8 260.24 17.2.5 Apr. 30, 1984 l8 260.25 17.2.6 Apr. 30, 1984 ld 260.26 17.2.6 Apr. 30, 1984 (6

../

- 3 l

260.27 17.2.6 Apr. 30, 1984 260.28 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 l

260.29 17.2.7 Apr. 30, 1984 gll 260.30 17.2.7 Apr. 30, 1984 4,1 260.31 17.2.7 Apr. 30, 1984 FS 260.32 17.2.7 Apr. 30, 1984 f8

~

s 260.33 17.2.8 Apr. 30, 1984 18

.)

260.34 17.2.8 Apr. 30, 1984 g8 i

260.35 17.2.9 Apr. 30, 1984 iB,J 260.36 17.2.9 Apr. 30, 1984 l8 '

260.37 17.2.9 Apr. 30, 1984

.[.

260.38 17.2.9 Apr. 30, 1984 8'

h v/

260.39 17.2.1, 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 l

I iv Amend. 15 3/85 23 il-L m..

m~.

....-.l.a:. Lb.h:. L.... j VEGP-FSAR-Q Relative Question Section/

Transmittal Question Subsection Date Amendment 1

260.40 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 260.41 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 260.42 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 260.43 17.2.10 Apr. 30, 1984 260.44 17.2.11 Apr. 30, 1984

~

260.45 17.2.12 Apr. 30, 1984 260.46 17.2.12 Apr. 30, 1984 260.47 1.9, 17.2.11, Apr. 30, 1984 17.2.12 260.48 17.2.12 Apr. 30, 1984 260.49 17.2.12 Apr. 30, 1984 260.50 17.2.13 Apr. 30, 1984 260.51 17.2.14 Apr. 30, 1984 260.52 17.2.14 Apr. 30, 1984 260.53 17.2.15 Apr. 30, 1984 260.54 17.2.15 Apr. 30, 1984 260.55 17.2.15 Apr. 30, 1984 260.56 17.2.15, 17.2.16 Apr. 30, 1984

,EU 260.57 17.2 Apr. 30, 1984 i

(

260.58 17.2.10, 17.2.11 Apr. 30, 1984 a

260.59 17.2.18 Apr. 30, 1984 260.60 17.2 Apr. 30, 1984 260.61 3.2.2, mise.

Apr. 30, 1984 260.62 3.2.2, 9.1.4, July 3, 1984

~

915 ak---- nrrmrm 2 gna aw===x mgg.W5ygq.,miu 270.1 3.11.5 Sept.

6, 1983 1

-271.1 3.10.B Sept.

6, 1983 15 280.1 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.2 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.3 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.4 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.5 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.6 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984-9 280.7 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.8 9.5.1, 9A, 9B Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.9 9.B Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.10 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.11 9.B Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.12 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 10 280.13 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 9

280.14 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 9

280.15 6.4.1, 9B Apr. 30, 1984 8

l 280.16 9.B Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.17 7.3.12, 9.0 Apr. 30, 1984 8

i s_. <

280.18 9.5.3, 9B Apr. 30, 1984 8

280.19 9.B Apr. 30, 1984 8

281.1 9.1.2 Jan. 23, 1984 5

v Amend. 15 3/85 fL N E.-

. - _ I-

' *0ij$$$5SLNua5

-.___./.....

i O

VECP-ESAR-Q

\\

Question 260.1 Provide an organization chart which clearly differentiates between the onsite and offsite organization elements which function under the quality assurance (QA) p'rogram controls.

Provide an organization chart of the Georgia Power Ccmpany QA department.

Describe the criteria for determining the size of the QA organization under the VEGP QA manager and the quality control (QC) organization under the QC supervisor.

Indicate the approximate number of technical personnel planned for the.se QA and QC organizations during normal operations.

Response

See figure 17.2.1-1 for a revised organization chart which includes onsite and offsite reporting? See paragraph 17.2.1.3j for QA manpower basis and size;'see subsection 17.2.10 for QC manpower basis and size.V See paragraph 17.2.1.4 for the revised offsite engineering description./

i 7.30 l-Ls c-224.,

M

~

g pcF g

(.*]

4 $ /. c r I fe/[cwed QVI

,, g e ba) g c.eu,( A @ m e e. a >

4 C# j??ecb*4

m.. a - l >.

(

Qf-vnt*I'*)

4 l

0 Bla d, I d

Q g 6 >5 ofd @

e/

("h.

d 3,

t 25 Q260.1-1 Amend. 8 7/84 Levr_

. Jk _ - - - -

am _

WM A* 8,$,E!'W"S W1 4MuSW d.-- p

Lik105?$ES GA 2LkDLak:L:

a-

~

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.2 Describe how QA and QC personnel:

A.

Identify quality problems.

B.

Initiate, recommend, or provide solutions.

C.

Verify implementation of problem solution.

's

Response

Actions associated with identification of problems, initiating solutions, and verification of corrective actions are described in subsection 17.2.18 for QA.

Identification of quality problems by QC is described in subsection 17.2.10.

The solution and verification of corrective actions to quality problems is described in subsections 17.2.15 and 17.2.16.

O$-

1 N

819 yy O

4 (s

B (1 26 I

Q260.2-1 Amend. 8 7/84

. -..... ~.

..:A.' l i..i.. l.... s...

*:lb$ 2i... '..

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.3 FSAR paragraph 17.2.1.3.2 indicates the VEGP QA manager has stop-work authority.

Clarify that this authority is in writing and includes the authority to control further processing, deliver, and installation of nonconforming material.

Clarify whether and personnel reporting to the y2GP QA nanager have ne same or similar authority.

%4? V y

hjl lSs#sN9'd g f Y

(.'.i f 0f W i

cd

Response

pt f

f See revised paragraphs 17.2.1.2.2,/17.2.1.3.2, and 17.2.1.3.4 for clarification on stop-work authority.

Ol' 4 (-

OK 8/I'/

l J

27 Q260.3-1 Amend. 8 7/84 l

' E$tO$'S,. $: a-. a. '

. ^ 2 $!5DI32 $

. ; J..T.

b

... h.

... a l

\\

~

i x'T VEGP-FSAR-Q

('

1 i

Question 260.4 FSAR figure 13.1.2-1 shows that the VEGP QC supervisor is a

/ ~5, member of the plant staff.

Describe Georgia Power Company's QA i

overview of the QC function.

For example, QA should review and i

approve QC procedures, should audit QC activities, should test j

and certify QC personnel, etc.

t i.

e r3

Response

\\

r QA participation in the development of procedures, which includes QC procedures, is described in paragraph 17. 2.1. 3. 4.-l E The oversight of.QC by the QA department is described in subsection '17.2.18.- 3 g i

Ok 1

1 i

8/W g3 l

\\

I I

i 4

-l,

,']

(.-

i J

i i

I i

, -s,

'J j

2B I

.Q260.4-1 Amend. 8 7/84 1

r,y

',; p p i g,

., ;.e 'e g:-](jg[

~W q

't ll A

9 j

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.5 Describe measures which assure that designated QA and QC 4

personnel are involved in day-to-day safety-related plant activities (i.e., the QA and QC organizations routinely attend and participate in daily plant work schedule and status meetings a

to assure that they are kept abreast of day-to-day work j

assignments throughout the plant and that there is adequate j)

QA/QC coverage relative to procedural and inspection controls, acceptance criteria, and QA/QC staffing and qualification of personnel to carry out QA/QC assignments).

J

-.Ig_

Response

g The QA department involvement in day-to-day safety-relat I

activities is described in revised paragraph 17.2.1.3.4.FThe QC department involvement in day-to-day safety-related activities is described in revised paragraph 17.2.1.2.2.,

OI V T zy g i

1

.I i

l 1

l f,

7-j * ',

_j l

4 29

-Q260.5-1 Amend. 8 7/84

.{

ut:,ri.:;Q?.i;yl ?

v,f,i, W5;t - -

b-:

e 1

3 1

VEGP-ESAR-Q j

Question 260.6 i

4 Describe Georgia Power Company's qualification requirements for its QA general manager and VEGP QA manager.

(Refer to the

.j NUREG-0800 reference for guidance.)

1 d

Response

d

(

Qualification for the general manager of QA and radiological S

health and safety and the VEGP QA manager.are described in L

paragraph 17.2.1.3.

/

i

.Y 0$

$ $ $f

(

}

l

._/

i

.i I

1 6

4 i

,.r d.

30

..c Q260.6-1 Amend. 8 7/84

-1 d

1 ridcMhMFh2 ^

.. [.]_

d._. _;.

..__.u....

,: ~.

n I

]

VEGP-FSAR-Q V...'

Question 260.7

]

Describe measures which assure that:

A sj A.

Quality-affecting procedures required to implement the j

QA program are consistent with QA program commitments

]! -

and corporate policies and are properly documented, controlled, and made mandatory through a policy statement or equivalen-t document signed by a responsible official.

Identify, by position title, who has responsibility for the policy statement.

?g j

B.

Georgia Power Company's QA organization reviews and l*

documents concurrence with these quality-related procedures.

~

i

Response

Policies for quality affec[ ting documents are described in revised subsection 17.2.2.

Georgia Power Company QA department involvement in procedure review and audit is discussed in paragraph h&

17.2.1.3.4.E and paragraph (u.2.15.G./l7 2 lI

'I y

"A4 j

a a

c -np_ w_ m. J'_ q_

.i.

~. 3 0/c

?

0/EM i

4 f

I i

r.

.s St Q260.7-1 Amend. 8 7/84 Y

I P

1.pME$g? -b_,,

'ji,~l_;.,_,.i,

- f *,, 'l -

.., % s.,

{.

g ['

~

\\,y\\,}C"t.#,

y' U Jn O f-

~,

VEGP-FSAR-Q

,q i (.

]'t Questian 260.8 g., y, [g f g j

Section 1.9 of the ESAR lists numerous exceptions, alternatives, 2/ g 3

and clarifications to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission QA l

guidance provided in the regulatory guides listed on pages 17.1-26, 17.1-27, and 17.2-6 of the Standard Review Plan t

(NUREG-0800):

A.

For each of these regulatory guides, the VEGP position should include words to the effect that " Georgia Power 6

Company commits to implement the regulatory position of 5

this regulatory guide during the operation phase of VEGP except as noted below."

~

Each of the notes should quote the specific guidance 3.

that is being clarified, that an alternative is being

.I provided for, or that an exception is being taken to.

1

+

ij C.

Each note"should then list Georgia Power Ccmpany's position as a clarification, an alternative, or an exception.

Each exception should be justified, and clarifications and alternatives should be discussed as a:propriate.

)

g.7

]

D.

For each note, provide Georgia Power Company's q

assessment whether their position meets the guidance or standard, exceeds it, or fails to meet it.

1 (0O"98)

]a Resconse g

lgM l9 See revised section 1.9.

a

,i I

-r u

k

..n le V(,.N L c-~ -

a

},

t

.e b}ec #

2 C-Q'n,y* p i l.h ',. \\

/^

y

\\

\\., g. g

'j F - [, ^,

g'$

v e.'

~

0- '

j

'~

a 4 c. ', u s ~.. \\-

I

..,N ~'

r.,

^'

q

.j!

1. ' y

~

(-j j

.., ~ 4 '-

s s.

s

.s II

, e-32 s-

'g. -

Amend. 8 7/84 m

~Q260.8-1 Amend. 9 8/84 7

4 1

. s

.o

, - ~

.n-n p

s.,,

.r.

. ~

l

..l

.t I

"n

( %.,

/~

VEGP-ESAR-Q 4

k Question 260.9 1

4 Describe measures which assure that, for structures, systems, j

and components covered by the ASME Soiler and Pressure Vessel i

Code Section III (Classes 1, 2, and 3), the code QA requirements-will be supplemented by the specific guidance addressed in the regulatory positions of the applicable regulatory guides.

j N

Resconse J

'}

Georgia Power Company commitments to the applicable regulatory j

guides are specified in section 1.9 of the ESAR.

Components is covered by ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III are 3-covered by these commitments.

3 m, ~. ll 7

i i;r o few IN q, e di u l

b.,1 O /<_

,a j G9 i

w 2g. B he us i

f g[s r c'f '

a ACC S/

g g.B is C

,5 Wo sc' {

fo S8

$p.1 q

c. tact, [1 c

h L'f }ll

',O'

/

i 33

,Q260.9-1 Amend. 8 7/04

' \\.

,.. :. d.

u... _ _.;

.~. _ - :

.3

-e

-]

VEGP-FSAR-Q

...t.

'J 5

Question 260.10

.i

-1 Describe measures which assure that Georgia Power Company's QA

'j m

organization and the necessary technical organizations determine Q. Q1 and identify the extent QA controls are to be applied to r

specific safety-related structures, systems, and components j)i during the operations phase of VEGP.

,'j

Response

I:

h

?

Subsection 17.2.2 describes the commitments which ensure the proper extent to which QA controls are applied.

Subsection 17.2.2 has also been revised to incorporate specific Standard

.:g Review Plan wording.

d T'

a 6k Y $4 n

l. k j) i

~l

.4

,. )

l 1

t i

?

e.

(: ~

. =.

i. il

., 4 l'

s/

t

-s S '+

,.Q260.10-1.

Amend. 8 7/84 s

.1,.

~*

,~.*'J

(

. i';

%,?.

J...1 e4,.

.. a

_.m.

.....___-_._......m,_

__..m_

I

,?

VEGP-FSAR-Q j

~.. -

Question 260.11 i

i Identify QA procedures which reflect that Appendix B to d

10 CFR 50 will be met during the operations phase of VEGP.

If any of these procedures are not yet issued, indicate the planned

.j date of publication.

9

Response

k' 3

V c'

See revised subsection 17.2.2 for the description of 10 CFR 50, p

Appendix B implementing procedures.

Ti '

lp<..\\

4 n

q i

/[.de r

4

.'2 a.<,k.02 j

o l,-

lP.

' p,r 1 c. t *

l

~

i.*

13 e

^ v J1e

~

l g gy:

/'-

!,JL)C u O

,j

-}

. /~ '

{

l 4

4 t

.:1 i

i

\\((

. // t.

'i

')

l i

i

.w

,(

t

'J i

36

'~. 9

~

j lQ260.11-1 Amend. 8 7/84 j

5.m

,n

_,. - +

p,

~

i VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.12 j

Describe how Georgia Power Company's executive vice t

president-power supply regularly assesses the scope,

status, i

adequacy, and compliance of the QA program to 10 CFR 50, Appendix 3.

These measures should include:

A.

.I Freq.2ent contact with program status through reports, i,1 meetings, and/or audits.

B.

Performance of a preplanned and documented annual i

assessment.

Corrective action is identified and i

tracked.

26 qbf) i Resconse W

6-o s>

See revised paragraphs 17.2.1.1, 17.2.1.1.1, and 17.2.1.3.1 for g

a description of the executive vice president power supply's review and assessment of the QA program.

0/t l

N. _../

i i

hk i

s os/zyyu a

.m

.(

's

'U 3G

.j Q260.12-1 Amend. 8 7/84 m--+.'

m

--.y.

y

'g.-'

g4

_g

'q

. ~'

i _ _ _._ _ __ _

._..i...-. -

VEGP-FSAR-Q

\\

Question 260.13 Describe measures which assure that:

o!"L,-

.I

-( - _

A.

Proficiency tests are given to personnel who/ perform and verify activities affecting quality and r.nac da*

acceptance criteria are developed to determine that these individuals are properly trained and qualified.

g/ m 6.w t

3 g l,fu A '

J.I B.

Certificates of qualifications clearly delineate (1)

J, the specific functions personnel are qualified to fy f c.

perform and (2) the criteria used to qualify personnel in each function.

Proficiencyofpersonnelwho(perform [andverify C.

activities affecting quality is maintained by retraining, reexamining, and/or recertifying.

Response

/

See subsection 17.2.10 for.a,cevision that expands QC personnel f'_-

training and qualifications.

The qualification requirements for

'q '.,

the plant personnel who perform activities affecting quality are discussed in subsection 13.1.3. V l1. 2.I o

-t tdn/ b M. I1/l. sts Cit

-S 6K ew

~;

i i

+

0

.^.

<f t

37 i

Q260.13-1 Amend. 8 7/84

{

,[

J

~

-i

.l r%

1

(

VEGP-ESAR-Q 4

j Question 260.14 1

Item F on FSAR page 17.2.3-2 addresses design interface

.j control.

Clarify that this control assures that structures,

.)j and components are compatible geometrically,

systems, functionally, and with processes and the environment.

l.)

O

Response

e.1

-)

See revised subsection 17.2.3.

OK T.

i s

Y..J 9

i

~.

4 i

{

t i

i. C '.

\\

4

'i 38

,jQ260.14-1 Amend. 8 7/84 s

~_

_____w.

i s

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.15 Describe procedures which require that drawings and

3 specifications be reviewed by the QA organization to assure that

' I (/

the documents are prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance with company procedures and that the documents contain the i

necessary QA requirements such as inspection and test

.t requirements, acceptance requirements, and the extent of documenting inspection and test results.

f h Resconse i

The QA department actione related'to drawings and specifications are the same as for procedure preparation.

QA participates in the development of procedures that control these activities (see paragraph 17.2.1.3.4) and performs in-depth audits of compliance to these procedures (see subsection 17.2.18).

In addition, the QA department performs in-depth technical / design audits to ensure the adequacy of design work.

In regard to independent review of design actions, subsection 17.2.3 discusses the commitments for independent verification.

Subsection 17.2.2 clarifies the controls which ensure proper QA attributes are

(

incorporated into procedures, drawings, and specifications.

Ny fo{p h t,,sr{stf' I

Nf**'^<$ ?'"

Q)L q

do es nd ye ea ew u... b.. J d..e a M a

/

i blL ?

A

\\O of(

"8 21 gv v'

39 j

Q260.15-1 Amend. 8 7/84 il 4

_ _ _ am.,

'I -.

I

, f.3 VEGP-FSAR-Q

{

Question 260.16 Describe guidelines or criteria established by Georgia Power

/.*'

Company for determining the method of design verification

\\. -

(design review, alternate calculations, or tests).

I

Response

{i'/3, The criteria and commJtment for derign verification are included

' "J in subsection 17.2.3;lwhich has been revised to clarify the verifier's responsibilities.

i hk

.I

's., 7, t

(

\\ ~ --

Fl i!

P W

t s

()

i J

f i

i i

i

,/^

t o.

\\

/

~

i i'

HO l

'l Q260.16-1 Amend. 8 7/84 t

il t

,, -}. _..._ __

VEGP-FSAR-Q yf Question 260.17 N

~

Regarding design verification, describe measures which assure c,,s. g

that:

e (f e t & ' p'

$cek',

~

A.

'The verifier is qualified and is not directly g,. 8

s[,. g 4 y[

responsible for the' design.

g.1 #

if other than by qualificationev # 9

.-+'

.}

B.

Design verification,

&f.( Y j

'q testing of a prototype or lead production unit, is 4

O completed prior to release for procurement, 9

manufacturing, and installation or to another 0K organization for use in other design activities.

In i

those cases where this timing cannot be met, the design verification may be deferred, providing that the justification for this action is documented and the fk unverified portion of the design output document and I

=

all design output documents, based on the unverified data, are appropriately identified and controlled.

In all cases, verification is complete prior to relying upon the item to perform its function.

C.

Procedures differentiate between design documents that are verified by design review teams and those which can be verified by review by a single individual.

D.

Design documents subject to QA controls include items such as drawings, specifications, calculations, computer programs, and system descriptions.

E.

The responsibilities of the verifier (s), the areas and features to be verified, the pertinent considerations i

to be verified, and the extent of documentation are identified in procedures.

o

Response

c l

The following-responses correspond to the above questions:

e i

A.

See revised subsection 17.2.3. N ~

~

t O

C i

-1 B.

See revised subsection 17.2.3'(item G).

-C.

Georgia Power Company uses individual and independent verification rather than design review teams.

The i

verifier qualification will ensure the appropriate review process.

t

(

0

/

o

-Q260.17-1

' Amend. 8 7/84 n:

. ~...,.

... _ -...... ~

.=

i

,. ~ ~ _,. -

.....u x

..m, VEGP-FSAR-Q

-$ A D.

The scope of the items covered by QA coptrol is

)

described in revised subsection 17.2.3. ~ e q A r q n.)<w s, ~,> p See7s Dess.

4 d%* opi1'y E.

revised subsecti*on 17.2.3.-7 A w

eg i

ha OK L

?1

~

i fY d

l

)

I s

l' 4

1-i t

li

\\

.~

v A.

.A l'

_ ~Q260.17-2

-Amend. 8 7/84

-v-

. 1i. 5S.im:. sbS2..<

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.18 Describe measures which assure that the following provisions are included, if the verification method is only by test:

A.

Proceduresprovidecriteriathatspecifywhenp4 verification should be by test.

B.

Prototype, component, or feature testing is performed as early as possible prior to installation of plant equipment or prior to the point when the installation b

would become irreversible.

lT t D.1 or Resconse See the responses to questions 260.16 and 260.17.

I

z.(vDsv ~

._ys -

Se. ) Go lb

' & p,,.

q n.2.5 1

~~.

OK l

4 (V

-e-84 2-

~Q260.18-1 Amend. 8 7/84

" ' " ' " " ' ~ ~ -

-m

.. l:,5$$1.010b$$&~5$.'l'..i..:x.u..

m VEGP-ESAR-Q Question 260.19 Describe measures which assure that procedures are establinhed to assure that verified computer codes are certified for use and that their use is specified.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.3.-

O /c.

t 6 K Shy /79 9

4

./~ '

v

~

43 r

Q260.19-1 Amend. 8 7/84 j,

^

..a

'. -.. l;a.s-l'i?5!5 E? $ 0..

.-. a.i l.. c N S 'A1 5.b......Lk%.5-

.. ~.

O

\\

VEGP-ESAR-Q Question 260.20

'l Describe how responsible plant personnel are made aware of design changes / modifications which may affect the performance of their duties.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.3.~l$

0/c d

(##

Ar OK

\\

l

> Q *Y t4 i

t e

i F

h h

(

i

./J M

j lQ260.20-1 Amend. 8 7/84 n

l 8

~'-.

. 1.NWi({;1,f,~.

,g,;._4M' gjj,j]._,

y VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.21 Part B of the second paragraph of FSAR subsection 17.2.4 indicates that qualified personnel knowledgeable in the QA requirements will review procurement documents.

Clarify that these personnel are organizationally independent of personnel who initiated the procurement documents.

Typically, the documents are originated by engineering, health physics, operating, or maintenance personnel and reviewed by QC and/or QA personnel.

If this review is done by personnel outside the QC and/or QA organization, describe the training and qualifications l

of these personnel.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.4. A:s-W s.

.,, g e... r,M" Q

[ \\..d

)

TYEN

\\/oes WD OY

~

9

,o e *

O cwk 4

gg,ff ox g.,

7 N

E.

i.

G' W

..._ - Q260.21-1 Amend. 8 7/84

.,-1' ", -

2.1. ays n: f [3 5.;c.__. r.J.2 m a._ 1_I.$$$1C..

_2.,_'.

4

..a_.

- }

. l.

a' 1

1 s

VEGP-FSAR-Q e

Question 260.22 Describe organizational responsibilities (including the

[fl involvement of Georgia Power Company's QA organization) for:

.1 A.

Procurement planning, t

'd B.

The preparation,' review, approval, and control of procurement documents.

...e

]'

C.

Supplier selection.

4-j D.

Bid evaluations.

~l Review and concurrence of supplier QA programs prior to E.

initiation of activities affected by the program.

Response

The following responses correspond to the above questions:

^

A.

The vice president and general manager-Vogtle nuclear

[

operations is responsible for procurement planning of

]'/

VEGP (see revised subsection 17.2.4)Tl og,

.{

B.

The vice president and general manager-Vogtle nuclear 1

operations, in conjunction with the vice president-engineering and services, is responsible for the preparation, review, approval, and controls of procurement documents (see revised subsection 17.2.4P." OA C.

Selection of suppliers will be made from a qualified supplier list.

The vice president engineering and services will be responsible for preparation and g

Ti control of the qualified supplier list (see subsection i

fc.

17.2.7dfor supplier qualification).

- )

--2 r!

D.

The vice president and general manager-Vogtle nuclear

}

-operations, is responsible for evaluating bids through

.' j appropriate departments.

E.

The vice president and general manager-Vogtle nuclear operations, in conjunction with the vice president-engineering and services, is responsible for review and concurrence of supplier qualifications prior to initiation of activities affected by the program (see revised subsection 17.2.4).

'},

'\\

i I.i

-Q260.22-1 Amend. 8 7/84

&f

~

=

' O.N.3b$ikUN..d _. 2;ua;.____N.hdl.bi._ :....:...~

.:.__a.._-_..

".)

}l;;

.1,

,j A

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.22 Describe organizational responsibilities (including the involvement of Georgia Power Company's QA organization) for:

[

A.

Procurement planning.

s 3/

B.

The preparation, revicv, approval, and control of 3

,lj procurement documents.

T3 C.

Supplier selection.

st D.

Bid evaluations.

hereI,Mordthvt

]

E.

Review and concurr ce of supplier QA programs prior to j

initiation of act vities affected by the program.

\\

gge % J J,; !w not been bdly ssJn.h4 c'-

(w desMIEhr fAey ete' J. fu b)

Georgia Power Company is in the process of developing a nuclear procurement policy manual intended to be applied to all Yh

activities dealing with the procurement of items,

parts, O

x ".. !

materials, and services that have been classified as safety related.

This manual is applicable to all Georgia Power Company personnel, architect / engineers, and supporting agencies involved 1

in obtaining materials and equipment for nuclear application.

The manual will describe organizational and functional responsibilities including:

procurement planning; the preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents; supplier selection; bid evaluations; and review and concurrence of supplier QA programs prior to initiation of activities affected by the program.

v.

cob - [ usedd Y oh suel o muua l si riee d e d,

a b/7

CW6Ver, i T 4.1 fa o

SK N

peg uJ I 6a. Peu o,-

J e s e,. im su4 o.3 u.t

/i=.I re sfca r, I,, 4 S e r.

f h wo.-ds - f4 /~S4#

[" N

.r? / re s,. us n-

.m

- j = O,A

_ - GPC a..Il ruae & cesyse i0 guh we

/

g l

g} h* j b rk.

p <escJ afg/<c 44 wo, dt, j

4 *gs{

h G

l1 4

.Q260.22-1 Amend. 8 7/84 9g 3

L s[Y:.-jf@;

.' ;. Jr%.'... %c M4.;hi. r.:4,.>.

.. ?.

..m m...

{

a s

1 i,

1 i

i

/o i

VEGP-FSAR-Q i

'~. -

Question 260.23 ESAR subsection 17.2.5 s'tates that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, pr5cedures, or drawings.

Describe Georgia Power Company organizational responsibilities for assuring that this is true.

Response

h See revised subsection 17.2.5.-\\

o Ic J.

OF sw r,

{. Ld

'i I

i 1

4 i

i J

i

'i h

1 4

./*,

i.

lI

.V_..-

i i

1 i

1

/

Q260.23-1 Amend. 8 7/84

~

j

~

o'

.,_ N, ril.d$5.555Eh. 5.Ln

~ - - -

1 i

I t

VEGP-FSAR-Q S., /

Questien 260.24 The last sentence of the first paragraph of ESAR paragraph 17.2.5.1 begins with "As applicable."

Define or delete this 3

expression.

It also states that the documents listed will be reviewed and concurred with by a person knowledgeable in j

" quality requirements."

Typically, this person should b'e from

/.

Georgia Power Company's QA and/or QC organization.

The last sentence of the first paragraph of FSAR paragraph 17.2.5.2 also uses the expression " quality requirements" in lieu of " quality 1

assurance requirements."

Clarify.

4 Ij,

Response

,0k Subsection 17.2.5 has been revised to delete "as applicable" and

[hoclarifytheuseof"qualityrequirements"inlieuof" quality assurance requirements."T The review and concurrence of the documents listed in subsection 17.2.5 is discussed in the i

/

response to question 260.4.

I Aoor

_~ /'

l

_ a

}. Q

,Ord C/' e n c w

1 1

)

a

-4 4

1 1

1

)

O

l k.&

-4 1

H6 f

i

'Q260.24-1 Amend. 8 7/84

,m n,_

m

--z-

hClt Ad%;..: '

".._...=..u--...

1 1

..l

'?'N VEGP-FSAR-Q E

l 3

Question 260.25 l

The first paragraph of FSAR subsection 17.2.6 lists documents to be controlled per Georgia Power Company's QA program.

it sj appears that the following documents should be included in the list.

Clarify the following:

-l

.}

A.

Design documents (e.g.,

calculations, specifications, and analyses) including documents related to computer f

codes.

1y B.

Instructions and procedures for such activities as fl fabrication and installation.

l lg -

C.

As-built documents.

y D.

QA and QC manuals.

E.

Topical reports.

F.

Nonconformance reports.

A.

)

Resconse M

Subsection 17.2.6 has been revised to include the above list of yj documents, with the exception of topical reports (not applicable 7!

at Georgia Power Company), to be controlled in accordance with di Georgia Power Cc=pany's QA program.

t 0E 0/f !

j T y/p/

4 U.!

,1;j I

i i%

.i

't.

c.!

j

'g

. :i d

49 ik j

.Q260.25-1 Amend. 8 7/84 1

._,s_

'jh l./ U.

.E.... _..

..e

_m

[l

.6yj

..t 1

~..,

c

(~

l VEGP-FSAR-Q

.r.

Question 260.26

,y Describe measures which assure that someone from Georgia Power R.'

Company's QA organization, or an individual other than the q], O, person who generated the controlled document but qualified in

/

QA, reviews and concurs with the document with regard to QA-related aspects.

.s

($

Response

sb

'J

.i See revised subsection 17.2.67 Qualification of the reviewer is

-j discussed in paragraph,17.2.5.1. N *#

inl726-a/

s i

6K

'?

g.,.'

Oo yEY 4

'{

{

_i

J fC/

lb 1-7 i

v%

.q

.,j

\\

+

t em.

'r s

1 w./

4b 50

?

&j Q260.26-1 Amend. 8 7/84 i

1

.g

-...._ _ s.m - _._.. __......

2 t

]

1 y\\

t

, e,s

,j

.t VEGP-ESAR-Q c, *.

j LI Question 260.27 1.,

{

Item D on ESAR page 17.2.6-2 states that master status lists j) identify document revisions.

Identify the documents so listed, the periodicity of updating, and the personnel (by organi=ation

j titles) who receive the lists.

g fj

Response

(4 09 i

Subsection 17.2.6'has been revised to include document revision vi.

and distribution clarification.

"]

t/

1-M t

14 EY/TV

[]

( _^.

t i

V l

1 l

f H

'I s.

a o

s 1

/

El

,4

(, s

-r Ii'

Q260.27-1 Amend. 8 7/84 Y

f e

e m '- m.,

.4

~es em.

'x.-._.._..

.u 1

2

't

~i

~4i VEGP-FSAR-Q j

7 Question 260.28 5

l Describe measures which assure that maintenance, modification, and inspection procedures are reviewed by qualified personnel 4

1 knowledgeable in QA disciplines (normally the QA organization) to determine:

A.

The need for inspection, identification of inspection personnel, and documentation of inspection results.

B.

That the necessary inspection requirements, methods, and acceptance criteria have been identified.

3

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.10.

0(d oK

.rm.

j u en.

.f.'.i

'Ii

1 I

);

!s

)

.:4 1

1 L

d

. i * (f:..:

~C.;/

i h.

SZ j

Q260.28-1 Amend. 8 7/84

1 r

VEGP-FSAR-Q

\\

Question 260.29 Describe Georgia Power Company organizational responsibilities, including for the control of purchased material, i

equipment, an services.

Resconse The vice president and general manager-nuclear operations is g.

responsible for ensuring qualification of suppliers of safety-related material, equipment, and services.

See revised f

y subsection 17.2.7.l

[f F

C) A

.{.

[ nd e g w d **

ps g n% m I 7. 7. 7-

^

/hd d

^8#

0 "I s

8/2, 7v

-:\\

.'l

]

)

l E

. /-, '.

i 53 Q260.29-1 Amend. 8 7/84

-e

E J

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.30 Clarify that procurement of spare and replacement parts is subject to QA program controls in place when the procurement is made and to technical requirements equal to or better than the originr1 technical requirements or as required to preclude the repetition of defects.

't

s

].

Resconse See revised subsection 17.2.7.-l

[j k

OK aBA%

.v/

r J

t i

r ',,

~

'.._./

i 54 4

'f.Q2 60. 30-1 Amend. 8 7/84

i

c

)

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.31 Item D on FSAR page 17.2.7-2 refers to " Items accepted or

~T released..." Change "or" to "and" or justify not doing so.

' ;)

i i

f.

Response

f k

In justification, " accepted and released" implies that only items that are accepted and released will have inspection status g.-

identified and can be placed in controlled storage or released

+

for issuance.

However, items which are nonconforming can be placed in storage if special storage conditions are required.

j Also, nonconforming items can be released for installation in

[

i accordance with ANSI N45.2.2-1972, sect, ion 5.3.3.

l l

~

Mote:"or usa.s cLS pl f.

J MJ. B i

.w

^

g 1

g

,]

24 pt t

I a

p a

1

\\

]

s./

.I 2

}

!'.! g I

Py j

v I

S S' i

l Q260.31-1 Amend. 8 7/84 1

l a

a.

.t.

m

o.

VEGP-FSAR-Q g

i. _

Question 260.32 j

Describe measures which assure that the supplier furnishes the j

ex following records to the purchaser:

i A.

Documentation that identifies the purchased item and 3

the specific procurement requirements (e.g.,

codes, standards, and specifications) met by the item.

B.

Documentation identifying any procurement requirements p.

(1 that have not been met.

C.

A description of those nonconformances from the procurement requirements dispositioned " accept as is"

]

or " repair."

l Describe how Georgia Power Company reviews and accepts these documents.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.7.

8wp i

{

r.,

t....i

~

4 a

!' d

/S, i

SG i

I Q260.32-1 Amend. 8 7/84 l

a

_~.

\\

VEGP-FSAR-Q

\\

Question 260.33 Part A of FSAR subsection 17.2.8 states that procedures provide for " verification that items received at VEGP are properly j

identified and can be traced to the appropriate documentation Then an exception is taken for off-the-shelf items.

Clarify that the exception does not negate the quotation above.

)

Resconse See revised subsection 17.2.8.

1 OK d e te fe l y d 8.

A excep ha "

OK

Je4xr, I-

\\../

i

'I f

hi i

4 4

e

.I S7

-j

~Q260.33-1 Amend. 8 7/84

-l j

1 J

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.34 Describe measures which assure the verification and documentation of correct item identification prior to release for fabrication, assembly, shipment, and installation.

lesponse j

~'

See revised subsection 17.2.8.- V i

OX 1

El C/C t

l 8 2Y gy l

t

.I O

-( /

-i 58 l

Q26G.34-1 Amend. 8 7/84 a

3 8

m.

a.

3 VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.35 Provide as complete a listing of special processes as possible rather than repeating the four examples given in NUREG-0800.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.9.'\\

B&^

0

'l S +tII a ? s uc l a s brY 0/C h> n 7

~

l

._s f

j P

i t

g

?'

"s

.- (

%.)

1 59 l

0566V

- 'Q260.35-1 Amend. 8 7/84

[

s

. =

a i

N VEGP-ESAR-Q

'l y

Question 260.36 Since it appears that QA's only involvement with special process control is audits, describe the QC organization's responsibflities in this area.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.9.-O a

o/c 02 I 2f 71 1

k_/

\\

k

,i-

'i

%./

e 60 Q260536-1 Amend. 8 7/84

.f

. o

1

~.

..,.....;:. e :

~

~'e._ Q 'gjL Q ;ft,ll;)

~

VECP-FSAR-Q Question 260.37 The second paragraph of FSAR subsection 17.2.9 addresses personnel, equipment, and procedure in the first sentence.

The second sentence addresses qualification of personnel and procedures only and does not address qualification of equipment.

Clarify.

}

s

Response

S@ f See Qvjsed subsection 17.2.9.

t 04(fe Gr (f'ege-i ~

eqa.p,w l c

-3 cque Cc-

'f we #< 4/c O/C

/ c u, f ec N 4

f a'p a ' f ok 8 zy M i

b

O J

t (e l i

JQ260.37 Amend. 8 7/84

-m e:

V~'

'* 4

m~ -, =..

.-m."..*

,....A l

...._;_.,~..

L au bd2^'Jh'Jy(f,%.

+

4

'"--" ~

' - " ~ ~ ~ ~

-s VEGP-FSAR-Q

\\

Question 260.38 Describe measures which assure that procedures are established for recording evidence of acceptable accomplishment of special processes using qualified procedures, equipment, and personnel.

Response

'1 1

See revised subsection 17.2.9.-3 l

i o r(

of 8 of gq i

4

(

N.._ /

s I

(* Z

-i Q260.38-1 Amend. 8 7/84

, a.....

____.___m._..

..-..s...

.~_?i' ;l7f4g-e %:;;~MM..

m -

~ _..

..s VEGP-FSAR-Q t

Question 260.39 Describe measures which assure that procedures provide criteria for determining the accuracy requirements of inspection equipment and criteria for determining when inspections are required or define how and when inspections are performed.

Also clarify that Georgia Power Company's QC specialists and QC inspectors are within the QC supervisor's organization.

l t

Response

l 4

See revised subsection 17.2.10 'and paragraph 17.2.1.2.2. #

O!L df

.f b

i I

i t

,P-t i

a s t

G3

'l Q260.39-1 Amend. 8 7/84 1

.. =...

~ ha.al2$15a L.a :-. L ;.:).l. ::~:.1$$.?.....

(I)}

VEGP-ESAR-Q s.

Question 260.40 The fifth paragraph of FSAR subsection 17.2.10 states that the QC supervisor is responsible for administering and implementing tests and inspections " assigned" to the QC department.

Identify any organi=ation(s) other than the QC department with responsibility for inspection.

Describe measures taken to assure that the inspection procedures, personnel qualification criteria, and independence from undue pressure such as cost and j

j4 schedule are reviewed and found acceptable by the QA i

organization prior to initiation of any inspection activity.

Resconse Departments, other than.the QC department, which will be responsible for performing inspection are:

A.

Engineering department - responsible for performing nuclear fuel inspection.

B.

Warehouse personnel - responsible for performing damage inspection.

I t

-/

C.

Vendors and contractors - responsible for performing inspection as delineated in their contract.

D.

Southern Company Services - responsible for inservice inspection and nondestructive examination.

Refer to revised subsection 17.2.10 for clarification on measures taken to ensure that any personnel who perform inspections will be qualified and that qualification records are documented and kept current.

QA's review to ensure inspection independence from undue pressure, such as cost and schedule, is covered by the system of QA audits discussed in subsection 17.2.18.

+

f,,

4Qe fees %/Ned8dt' f,,,,, g, j g/% f o /,,,.*

u nps /, c_ /,s m /3 c-k J 8 yemes StKT W w hn b* folk *S

" $u. ' p rom il ou im o f "paUy w f r.1 p,.cn.nal '

OK f.'--)

N

[

_Q260.40-1 Amend. 8 7/84 M

D

, a.c. nL.2cC&hUR

.~.

l' VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.41 The last sentence in the sixth paragraph of ESAR subsection 17.2.10 states:

" Procedures containing inspection criteria shall be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that adequate inspection hold points are included and inspection methods are adequate."

Clarify that the reviewing personnel are from Georgia Power Company's QA and QC organization.

Also discuss the review of procedures which do not contain inspection criteria but which, perhaps, should.

Response

la Refer to revised subsection 17.2.10 which incorporates clarification for both this question and question 260.28.

O$

t i

t 2.f s

t s

I r

[

t u

t

?

i 1

1

[

'(

% s-r

', q t

06 f

i

!I

~J.Q260.41-1 Amend. 8 7/84 f

'/

e i

s

. ~. - _ _ -. ~

7...: :: '

. ; +.

, ;.w t. n a L :,G a.,

. ~. ; :.a:.:: 2 c..: :in:.m.,.

.= W.= -

v

/-

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.42 Inclusion of the words " nondestructive examination" in the last sentence in the fifth paragraph of FSAR subsection 17.2.10 unacceptably limits the commitment.

Delete these words or describe in similar detail the qualifications and certification of inspectors for inspections other than nondestructive examination.

s,

Response

s.

See revised subsection 17.2.10.

( NDF ha.c Se ea de.kM 0/(

i

[2,1 79 i

~

i

. s I

i 1

+

(o6 i I Q260.42-1 Amend. 8 7/84 1

.C.%

'- !?%I':Ab $$ubllite CLu $ _.::. 5 8 S $( {E b i b..

i VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.43 Describe measurer. which assure that procedures provide criteria for determining the accuracy requirements of inspection and test equipment and criteria for determining when a test is required or how and when testing activities are performed.

i

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.10.~ 3 1

i OK I

e

(

i 9

i

?

i i*

4 i

1

+

t g

V i

G7 i

l l

-Q2do.43-1 Amend. 8 7/84 l

~

-....1 ;d.G!.NdE' 1:5'lb,?l4h:2..O,:.a.u L:3:: ~ '." '%%i$k'h(,:-,. _ 6 0?.:'.._..

i s

er*

VEGP-FSAR-Q

(

,1

/

Question 2

.44 Describe measures which assure that test prerequisites are met.

Response

5 See revised subsection 17.2.10 for accuracy and criteria.

How testing activities are to be performed is described in

i

( D.

subsection 17.2.11.- l.C.10 i

1._y 1

oK 1 '

4 l

2y TV s.

Q L

fs

.,h d

, +

l 1

t l

O i

68

.]

Q260.44-1 Amend. 8 7/84 4

?;' % : 6 d.h.Qijki Q K -c

': jL:$g@0Ni L '

_ _ a.;._ __

a..-

.i N

-j A

(

VEGP-FSAR-Q l

Question 260.45 l

Since is appears that QA's only involvement with the control of measuring and test equipment is audits, describe the QC

'l organization's responsibilities in this area.

-1

~d

[

Reseense P

The QC department is responsible for monitoring the control of

[r measuring and test equipment for compliance to plant

)

procedures.

QC will verify control of measuring and test

.3 equipment during inspections of work activities.

See revised

],

subsection 17.2.12.-l/

)

'j.

i Ok OfJ (a,

k 4

.j

_l

)

.1 T

1 1

/N.

'l j

69 i.;;

Q260.45-1 Amend. 8 7/84

-:e ' - +.11l nl:Ff:

'cn

,9;:tQJ:-[;),_,

.u s_..._.-

^

^^

i i

..l 4

/

( g; VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.46 4

Identify the organization (s) responsible for the preparation, j

review, and documented concurrence of calibration procedures.

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.12.'"L,j/e.W

g\\

Olc 1.

O[

t 8 4 s u'

,m.

5 i

- 1 e

i N.4 i

9 a,.. /-

70

.a

'1

Q260.46-1 Amend. 8 7/84 s

_~.x t,u iwri;

r g gesQj. -

. w a-

'. I

!.t

.1

-l h

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.47 Item B in FSAR subsection 17.2.11 states that installed process instrumentation at VEGP will not be tagged or labeled with calibration due date.

Describe how Georgia Power Company will 1

assure that such instrumentation is not past due for

j calibration.

,1 d'

Response

The exception included in subsection 17.2.12 (item B) has been j

removed.

The exception or clarification to ANSI N18.7-1976, paragraph 5.2.16, if necessary, will be appropriately covered in

- i, '

section 1.9.

ofC St c

(.

)

g ty T'/

v s

i 4

t l 1

1 I

t

. f' )

Qi i

TI Q260.47-1 Amend. 8 7/84

]

(y.

"~l..

.. % :Qy '.q :'>......_.__:

. - _a -

i

[/

VEGP-ESAR-Q s,,

Question 260.48 Item F and the third paragraph of ESAR subsection 17.2.12 refer to "an authorized level of management."

Clarify what this means.# Also clarify or delete the expression, "when applicable," at the end of the third paragraph.

. 1,

.A Resconse w.

2 1

See revised subsection 17.2.12.

'/

i

~;

WK

'I

- 's e, c de(cp.)

iJ 3

2 f

n.

Dft kec 1w

!'W %pa a su /e+ cts / e, a.ky, b)'

/ 7. 2./2 -Z F 1

m

.J

.{

0/c

~:i

?

flty 4

.i i

3

-I

<l i

i m,

.i 72 Q260.48-1 Amend. 8 7/84

~ (6fNWis. ((

_ Ai_.

..~.. -. - -

~~

'~^

. l~'^

-l 0

\\

.i

(' ~ m',

VEGP-ESAR-Q e

4

- j

\\;

i f

Question 260.49 l

Describe measures which assure that inspection and tests are repeated on items determined to be suspect because of questionable calibration status of measuring and test

. ;t d

equipment.

c.

Response

/

See revised subsection 17.2.12.-

/

4

~

L

.- l,

.i a

d /<.

I a.

I 8h4 14

.. ]

. i 4

d,

}

.i i

1

".1

!id A

R I

i 1

I i

73

.Q260.49-1 Amend. 8 _7/84

i..

.;h.....

9

~

.:t

?;

. :1 iy

-I

(-

.i l

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.50 k

Clarify or delete the following expressions from ESAR subsection 17.2.13:

-l

/

.j A.

As necessary.

8 3j B.

As required.

~

.A C.

To the extent required by these special handling /

'j instructions.

fj Also identify the Georgia Power Company organization responsible 3

for the inspections and surveillance referred to in item A of d.

~

this FSAR subsection.

l Resconse 3

See revised subsection 17.2.13.

(1,,s s f er. b'"'

Q,w. 's, s

+

@ g t-ht" 0 $

) ;c,1 1.s g Psv~"

y j

l b

. fad B /

N'

+V' m

w

,..c o v

l; o(L

.1

.2 W;

f 1

0

%v rv

!i I./' '

i s

V' 4

1

..t

. Q260.50-1 Amend. 8 7/84 cc +

.__:.m_2; _ _.-

i l.,.3, 3.

y VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.51

-]

Clarify that inspection stamps and weld stamps are controlled as per the procedures noted in item A on FSAR page 17.2.14-1.

I ri

'i

Response

.d

[l}

See revised subsection 17.2.14.

adM'"F "I'

V

?!

O f}

,j i

6rf 2 4 - r c/

a i

..~,

J c!

1 I

d 4i t

i 4

.i

!i)

'l tj

--a

,- l 1

1 1

i i

75 I

s Q260.51-1 Amend. 8 7/84 7

--~-~~

~

)

a::

~s y

VEGP-FSAR-Q

)

Question 260.52 Describe procedures to control altering the sequence of ij safety-related tests, inspections, and other operations such

.j that the alterations are subject to the same controls as the d

original.

M

-~

d

]

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.14. g g Ok i

t -

'N dB

(,

i.j O'

a 1ti

-3 Sd I

i

.3

.1 il

j ij gi I

.1 1

l ;; *. %

i t.

/

i l -

?'

i 76

!.i je Q266.52-1 Amend. 8 7/84 f.

lg

.i..-

's t

(

VEGP-ESAR-Q

~

Question 260.53 Describe QA, QC, and other organizational responsibilities for the definition and implementation of activities related to nonconformance control.

Identify the organization (s) responsible for identifying and documenting nonconforming, inoperative, and malfunctioning items to prevent inadvertent Identify the organization (s) with authority and use.

.j responsibility for the disposition of nonconforming items and 1

for the review of the disposition and closecut.

,j 1

,j Resoonse See revised subsection 17.2.15.

Changes were based on most

ecent Hatch Nuclear Plant FSAR commitments, g/

fd~

)

1 1

j

(,

s 77 Q260.53-1 Amend. 8 7/84

. _ _. - -. - - - ~ - -

~'

~

1

't i

m

/ N

{

VEGP-ESAR-Q Question 260.54 Clarify that the nonconformance controls of FSAR subsection 17.2.15 are applicable to computer codes.

1 1

Resconse i]

7';

see revised subsection 17.2.15.-l d

"}

O[

O$

' t 8~2y-gy

~

. (<

4 x../

)i!

o;e i

l t

i i'

f i

i

!i i:

ij-j' i

t.

4 1

/

s I

i',

'Q260.54-1 Amend. 8 7/84 i;. j u

~

(%

VEGP-ESAR-Q

../

s J

Question 260.55 Describe measures which assure that nonconformances are i

corrected or resolved prior to the initiation of the preoperational test program on the item.

7,j

Response

See revised subsection 17.2.15.-1 I ( G e6 *.' " b 5 b l

.I

.i i O/c.

1 Od 1

r.'

5Y

.i i

T a

i 1

I i

i !

4 6

!.f s,

s.

.t

/

79

^l Q260.'55-1 Amend. 8 7/84 I

8 i

a

3 VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.56 j

Identify the Georgia Power Company organi=ation responsible to independently review and analyze nonconfocmance reports and 4j report quality trend information as stated in FSAR subsection 17.2.15 (page 17.2.15-2).

Response

r

/?

1 Subsection 17.2.16'has been revised to incorporate additional information on trends, organizational responsibilities, and implementing details.

These changes are based on recent Hatch 1

Nuclear Plant ESAR commitments and the response to question 260.55.

-1 Y (*"

g

(.g g. #

l l(

([.#3

<h j

a~

0-j

/

ox c

h 5

b1 gu 9

i e

b pW I

/

i:

k i

f

3'l

,,7 ;,:;.

-(Q260.56-1 Amend. 8 7/84 i

.u..

v. ~..

/

(

VEGP-ESAR-Q Question 260.57 Clarify whether Georgia Power Company's QA or QC organization i

reviews and documents concurrence with corrective action ci procedures, is involved in the documented concurrence of the adequacy of the corrective action, verifies proper implementation of corrective action, and closes out the fi corrective action in a timely manner.

i d

-j

Response

Review and concurrence with corrective action procedures are j'

handled in the same manner as other plant procedures.

These

i practices are discussed in subsections 17.2.1, 17.2.3, 17.2.5, and 17.2.9.

With regard to corrective action system implementation, revised subsection 17.2.16 provides additional s

details.

1i I

kWE\\\\ Qa* '

...s i

i ek LV (V I

i l

4

.i I

^

\\), ' \\,_*.

81

,..'l,;Q260,.57-1 Amend. 8 7/84 ra w,

i

[

VECP-FSAR-Q Question 260.58 Describe measures which assure that inspection and test records t

include (in addition to the items listed in FSAR subsections 17.2.10 and 17.2.11):

1 A.

Information related to conditions adverse to quality (inspection records only).

B.

Action taken to resolve any discrepancies noted.

' l

Response

See revised subsections 17.2.10.and 17.2.11. - 16

. 2, y 38

-ll b$

(-

YV/gy 4

'i i

r 1

i

):I!

Is i,

t r

v i

j

' V..

<l 82, i

,_,' ;c,4 0Q260.58-1 Amend. 8 7/84

~ ~

~ ~ ' ~ ~

9

( ~

VEGP-FSAR-Q

\\

Question 260.59 Clarify whether the Georgia Power company QC organization at the VEGP is responsible for any auditing and/or surveillance.

If so, describe measures which sssure that:

A.

QA reviews and concur in the schedule and scope of these activities by QC.

e l

B.

Resu5ts of these activities by QC are provided to QA for review and assessment.

i

Response

The QC department is not responsible for audit activities; the QA department is responsible for auditing activities as discussed in subsection 17.2.18.

The QC department is not committed to surveillance activities.

Any surveillance-

~[

activities above and beyond regulatory requirements will be t

2 performed at the direction of the plant manager.

/

p

{\\

a p c.8e q,ot"1 e

u,,c v.tr

, e p.

/.J '

s f

p 6[

6 a

}W g

2 i

Ok 8/w e 1

B3 t

J Q260.59-1 Amend. 8 7/84

. -..,.. ::...... _ -~.....= :=.:

o

/

VEGP-FSAR-Q Question 260.60 Either delete or clarify what is meant by the word " selectively" when used in front of the word " audit" and in the last paragraph of ESAR subsection 17. 2. 8,' 17. 2.11,' and 17. 2.13.' Also, since the last paragraph of subsections 17.2.4 through 17.2.17 refers to Georgia Power Company's audit program, include a similar reference as the last paragraph of subsections 17.2.2 and 17.2.3 or justify not doing so.

Describe measures used to audit conformance to FSAR commitments.

Response

The word " selectively" has been deleted from subsections 17.2.8, 17.2.11, and.17.2.13.

Reference # o the " audit program" has been t

added to the subsections 17.2.2 and 17.2.3D Subsection 17. 2.18 -1 F has been revised to include auditing commitments.

gk W ( 1,1. 3 ' '

I 7

u)hea.

-c O

et 6]8?v-BY 4

'. /V es j

Q260.60-1 Amend. 8 7/84

m. 7.. g1

.2

,4.

6 s

s

.....L. a.... 2: u.n...

_ 7...

ti Lis_3 3

'O'u rs ro :

7. L.

M ( L140.AN i

W y?.Y W,Y b

( h ! o. 4 7..

Q h

W G~o--9M{42-5~

~

/Lw b~ hw.~

0 IL 2;

3

^

Y. f u m bs' tt q e a 6e_m b & ~ M & I2a & & < r R L<. ~ L % e r )

(%.o n.a.

s%.-c!4_. e m Q M g u i g 4 :. p\\

20,

~ ~. -

.. [

G n

<.D A,

.......... =......

Iy cf & % ' D 1 W d c,,k N &

D I A"

}

C P P-.

50. 54-(

A0

~

hl.dhL.*?Q<

3. GW MwbLd2 M

,w cp FsAse W

t.9 h 6

dec.

esk (u sc mum _.

~

() o e

e- -

A & l. 8, l.

3 > l. / W, I.

u.

3 el O AAEta.<. d

' fY &

'w

. %+ _ Lh s 4 nyA eer @WAf#&,ea (oavW L

.' gzw.mns

.as & 6 9. 2. Q h 1 u> abo Cn.zs3, d c-c h s %

s-sus & W lt 2-3 h

a Ob +M' u.

dem&

6-6m s 4 m

.A L

A

%~

42

2es u

... L a.:

_....%.;.i.

a.

v 0 g.

,.I f A.

I/

M 6

h C

vs k h dLy

.-s g

W6 &

sk~

~

A% &s m

WJ fL' mn s

2A

= cum y

%(

OQA.P d.-t h d 7 f./ A is y

(\\Liw l

M w a a 4. J. x.uh> iW 2/4 % AWm n,uinLuk W 4 &tiv 1 utl h,'

a m --

4 lC=4M_; ').

~

,m l

S i '

l i

i t

(

V' I

i ll 1'

l' s

i -

.A..= 0.;:. w... I. a...a =.il&2ii.s:=

f,

.. hY

-('. k jl _. a c :. _.. E.'. k 1 d. U f J, P E 4 R_. te u

s e "Md to c.pe_. cra. 3tf (g)

QM (w-ia$." f f.5R-Py & A dAu e.e i.70, 02.n, & 3,.

WAL

.0 W 4 S

" C#uh FM (Lu.au~ P~<~fttetns C4 J

N. L.v]e WM ? y__ (Lo

-F9%R-t,hfo-l.. t. G. - 2..L pf I 5 ') asA. ). l. 6. l f

(

1i t -3 ).

I o C F A 5 0. 3 4' p fu2. wh M 7

wew i 4_., MF i

o' 6 -

h n

d.?

w M.. c L

% + u,nu.M,

M ' M O b 'U20, C 8 C c - cu e a - m-w= cts & w

,Md

-W

'e h,.

fMe, t. 70, %

f, 7 (2

)

h b

%2 4 m p, W p uu L + p' qw M

c & m c w ev L

9 a c.s. n c q u a s e s a t u po-a.m th aitww w-LQJa.~ d @.w a%>

U p%mes

% Aa k %

cL c e s t 0.tc,v.c, v.'

' O CER Go. ~5[, VMJ.y

, l O o ct. 2 t M. $ $

kA42-. f.

s a J a k

, a w of._ Y' '

E4 v.Jh Q k._

cpazu w A h..r n 9v.4 $(w 0

3,dj2s-tA &v

( m.M k

Ab n y e

L M v.J o u a~ p u,

^^

m_

.n

,...my'.'.---

w

^

' ;(z'Mk nehw' n.d--

,.p',,

...~- -. s A u s.~..s 54.'

o

.* E.. l r c~,

S YNU% AU*

%d F9A hCr t 70 h d.cn v.+.:.

mta

. p3 y

'eyno & Jpw dadsub c m o9 9 r

, 'c6 aAo udh gk. M A b' k.h au

~

e

... NO.v u f~ g n, p Q '

tMy r,

pn.

. Mum. & & asa n &-6 b. wa x'r= =

w Adh Mm M (M EA~ d b0$o Au

, tb.- hh)sa

,. ' lL." "~

(~"*~ ' P " 7 ?

to d. N 4 ser tvs' a_ v -

d n.S 9

, J 4 <v sudm.

n. s.

e 6

a up u w u/1A.L*k Yu Y LU6 g OA.LL 3.s L'

.L nl., cw s b & ALa%2 in~ fn uxv% -

W*$a I

% M.

~ a - w d;n k &

K h-s

.,sLa % G M L A&L M )~ms

'(W; %a a w.w. u it

~ ~ '

p x f t a i t <!L M g

.eb a w L.

~

cn.

+ pug

.m.

..~ d-J.i... -... w.: ...

..w.tSK.'t. - -..

.ny" ws b 4 k u. L [- s t.

I

. p

-u2 d 4 & w p' 4G W ' :- 1

hq ( % 3

,5

%emy gg-ur p p' W^ &e l

& _W-w.uk

-kies

.bY T

w Yll ngD.,

8

)

.r, L - -

-@ _ h.

p

$h

~

d G4. htWW U.

ORAF 462 Z?

' &y h, t DA J.

a

- _-t.

_ _ _ _ _..hM h6D k]gn.,d

^.x

~pt 's ;-

N A

.ICLHJ2Mh ud

_ <_q.,..m &~, -Q,ym, :. a, a, s oc

.e w

a m~g ;-

,.,t.e p-

+

-e4 7c aa

-ag s,

Ramh '

1 G wg& M-Q n ~ f Q -th,

Al-y l

.,& ru%n,

e s1

. Pyn 6

% & h h tJ 4 i

ts.wawrtwJ _

i

.A< Mi 1 ".

u. %

j,.[~, hd i-

'h il il.

'm

--we

<ms.-

m --

>~---'.s-~

a,a.___..-_...___.--..E--

4 4.e

.-asa

__._m-.a

-4

-t.

-.A

-ma

.-e.s a

1.--.

-a 4

.. :. c,2..,

% tz-In 9:a a - g.n 1 o

\\ fit f

~

asy m w

wa.

k m w

sy Ms V

renw S A n te % hs

&4m 4

@4pp%

M

~ L 1

padurye &

f a m-M,,u a p M.

m gL M J W m

w n k u bl a yu%

u 1k6 %(QvA()

l g_oA A

W ~

I N '( g an 4.g s

~m x w.

2 p"

a a na A p p e p %A - +6 ~g W

3

~

l

.I

Ve.

ac Ai@';g*e.. -

g-a _. B u,-

4.a _

d,_2_;,.,

j f.

_ p M.. _m

.i I

'o UNITED STATES g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

WASHINGTO N. D. C. 20555

(

-l1 j

April 12,1984 1

Docket Nos. 50-424 I

and 50-425 Il J

G MEf10RANDUM FOR: Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing l

Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

J. Nelson Grace, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, 2]

and Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

V0GTLE QUALITY ASSURANCE Applicant:

Georgia Power Company (GPC)

Licensing Stage:

OL iSi Responsible Brancn:

LB #4 j

I

?)

Project Manager:

Melanie Miller Review Status:

Q-1 complete except for QA-list (See Q 260.61)

-f d

The Quality Assurance Branch has reviewed the FSAR section describing the Quality Assurance Program (Section 17) submitted in support of the Operating License application for the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP). We reviewed the FSAR versus Section 17.2 of Revision 2 of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

T Aaditional information (see enclosure) should be requested of GPC to satisfy the staff's current requirements. The last question results from the NRR e

branches' review of the safety-related items controlled by the QA Program.

l If there are any questions regarding tnis review, please contact Jack Spraul

)

on Ext. 24530.

f We suggest a meeting with GPC after they have drafted a response to the enclosure.

1 The meeting should include a tour of the plant site.

3

^

g J. Nelson Grace, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Safeguards,

]

and Inspection Programs

. Office of Inspection and Enforcement i

n

- (d.s

Enclosure:

4..,

LDj Request for Additional l ':

Information I

80 l'.

L:

_ m;

. -i; ~ip-rWilh -

1.

t

.. ~..-.... - -...

"_:t 4

'.T Thomas M. Novak April 12, 1984 q.

DISTRIBUTION:

DCS QASIP Reading QAB Reading JSpraul Reading

1 JNGrace JGPartlow

'S GTAnkrum W

JMilhoan

[6 JSpraul EAdensam, NRR Miller, NRR CUpright, Region II 3.,j Malloy

.1

~1

~.

Sh

j

.-a i

Q

~

.il

,1 1

=i.

(

-i

.O}

J.

IE:QA8 IE: AB' IE:QA8 IE:DD/QASIP IE: IR/QASIP JSpraul: esp 4/,$hoan N nkrum JMi JGPartlow JNGrace 4/;c/84 s/84 4//p/84 4/ /84 4//6/84

.t

,:j r.

u1 H

m

- ~ ~ -

~

~ ~ '

'piM_yia

.m.

m l.

,'j

't t3 S....

v

~. !

Request for Additional Information

~]

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant 260.0 Quality Assurance (QA) 260.1 Provide an organization chart which clearly differentiates between (IAS)*

the onsite and offsite organization elements which function Y

under the QA program controls. Provide an organization chart of the GPC QA Department. Describe the criteria for determining the size of the QA organization under the Vogtle QA Manager and the QC organization under the QC Supervisor.

Indicate the "j

approximate number of technical personnel planned for these QA

.'j and QC organizations during normal operations.

ij 260.2 Describe how QA and QC personnel j

(183) a.

Identify quality problems b.*

Initiate, recomend, or provide solutions c.

Verify implementation of problem solution 260.3 FSAR Section 17.2.1.3.2 indicates the Vogtle QA Manager has 1

(184) stop-work authority. Clarify that this authority is in writing hm,.- )

and includes the authority to control further processing, delivery, V

and installation of nonconforming material. Clarify whether O

QC personnel and personnel reporting to the Vogtle QA Manager have the same or similar authority.

260.4 FSAR Figure 13.1.2-1 shows that the VEGP Quality Control

[

(1081)

Supervisor is a member of the plant staff. Describe GPC's QA overview of the QC function. For example, QA should review and approve QC procedures, should audit QC activities, should test and certify QC personnel, etc.

?

260.5 Describe measures which assure that designated QA and QC

-~ }

(186) personnel are involved in day-to-day safety-related plant activities (i.e., the QA and QC organizations routinely l

attend and participate in daily plant work schedule and status D

meetings to assure that they are kept abreast of day-to-day rj work assignments throughout the plant and that there is S

adequate QA/QC coverage relative to procedural and inspection

'j controls, acceptance criteria, and QA/QC staffing and qualifi-i cation of personnel to carry out QA/QC assignments).

Parenthetical alpha-numeric designations are from Chapter 17 of NUREG-0800.

m l*(a..i

]

,,m

~

s.

., ~.; L

.. --.. :. u -.....:

.}

}

~

q i

O 4

<.. ; Q

2 1

260.6 Describe GPC's qualification requirements for its GMQA and 4

(IC2)

Vogtle QA Manager.

(Refer to the NUREG-0800 reference for guidance.)

1 260.7 Describe measures which assure that 9

(281) 4 a.

quality-a 'ecting procedures required to implement the

[1 QA program are consistent with QA program comitments and corporate policies and are properly documented, controlled, and made mandatory through a policy state-ment or equivalent dccument signed by a responsible official.

Identify; by position title, who has responsibility for the policy statement.

i b.

GPC's QA organization reviews and documents concurrence

j with these quality-related procedures.

~

260.8 Section 1.9 of the VEGP-FSAR lists numerous exceptions, (2B3) alternatives, and clarifications to the NRC QA guidance provided in the Regulatory Guides listed on pages 17.1-26, 17.1-27, and 17.2-6 of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

p i

r j

a.

For each of these Regulatory Guides, the VEGP Position

'O should include words to the effect that "GPC commits to j

implement the Regulatory Position of this Regulatory

i Guide during the operation phase of VEGP except as noted below."

j, I

b.

Each of the notes should quote the specific guidance j

that is being clarified, that an alternative is being provided for, or that an exception is being taken to.

Each note should then list GPC's position and identify 1

c.

j the position as a clarification, an alternative, or an j

exception. Each exception should be justified, and clarifications and alternatives should be discussed as o

appropriate, l

=

d.

For each note, provide GPC's assessment whether GPC's 1

position meets the guidance or standard, exceeds it, or G

fails to meet it.

i h

260.9 Describe measures which assure that, for structures, systems.

(2B3) and components covered by the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III (Classes 1, 2, and 3), the Code QA require-ments will be supplemented by the specific guidance addressed fg in the regulatory positions of the applicable Regulatory Guides.

t

f-

_.. j b

i

't u.-

- ', ~. nu-. -. _ -ww _

m.

n

.,.a g u,._

__.m.._

~

30-a-

3 k-!

W 260.10 Describe measures which assure that GPC's QA organization and (283) the necessary technical organizations determine and identify d

the extent QA controls are to be applied to specific safety-

.)

related structures, systems, and components during the operations 6

phase of VEGP.

1

')

260.11 Identify QA procedures which reflect that Appendix B to 10 CFR

.a (284) 50 will be met during the operations phase of VEGP.

If any 8

of these procedures are not yet issued, indicate the planned date of publication.

260.12 Describe how GPC's Executive Vice President Power Supply regularly E

(2C1) assesses the scope, status, adequacy, and complianca of the QA

]':

program to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8.

These measures should include:

.G

{

a.

Frequent contact with program status through reports, 1

meetings, and/or audits.

b.

Performance of a preplanned and documented annual assess-ment. Corrective action is identified and tracked.

260,13 Describe measures which assure that:

(m l

(20) i j

20 Proficiency tests are given to personnel who perform and a.

1 verify activities affecting quality and that acceptance M

criteria are developed to determine that these individuals are properly trained and qualified.

d b.

Certificates of qualifications clearly delineate (a) the specific functions personnel are qualified to perform 3

and (b) the criteria used to qualify personnel in each function.

,.3

]j Proficiency of personnel who perform and verify activities c.

affecting quality is maintained by retraining, reexamining,

]

and/or recertifying.

3-260.14 Item F on FSAR page 17.2.3-2 addresses design interface control.

q (30)

Clarify that this control assures that structures, systems, and components are compatible geometrically, functionally, and with i

j processes and the environment.

260.15

. Describe procedures which require that drawings and specifica-(3E2).

tions be reviewed by the QA organization to assure that the documents are prepared, reviewed, and approved in accordance j

with company procedures and that the documents contain the i

necessary QA requirements such as inspection and test require-

/g i

O.)

ments, acceptance requirements, and the extent of documenting inspection and test results.

-i iiMj.

~$

y a-

_. -. ~ -

. - - =

1 1

,r

-}

( 4 I

260.16 Describe guidelines or criteria established by GPC for deter-(3E3) mining the method of design verification (design review, I

alternate calculations, or tests).

'i 1

260.17 Regardin1 design verification, describe measures which assure (3E4) that:

6 a.

The verifier is qualified and is not directly respon-sible for the design.

b.

Design verification, if other than by qualification

~

testing of a prototype or lead production unit, is completed prior to release for procurement, manufactur-ing, installation, or to another organization for use

'j in other design activities.

In those cases where this timing cannot be met, the design verification may be deferred, providing that the justification for this action is documented and the unverified portion of the design output document and all design output documents, based on the unverified data, are appropriately identi-fied and controlled.

In all cases, verification is complete prior to relying upon the item to perform its

(,j function.

s._

-l c.

Procedures differentiate between design documents that

]j are verified by design review teams and those which can be verified by review by a single individual.

d.

Design documents subject to QA controls include items such as drawings, specifications, calculations, computer programs, and system descriptions.

e.

The responsibilities of the verifier (s), the areas and features to be verified, the pertinent considerations to t

l be verified, and the extent of documentation are identified in procedures, 1

260.18 Describe measures which assure that the following provisions (3E5) are included if the verification method is only by test:

I; '

a.

Procedures provide criteria that specify when verifica-tion should be by test, b.

Prototype, component, or feature testing is performed as early'as possible prior to installation of plant i

equipment, or prior to the point when the installation

,n would become irreversible, j

V l

s

,- m 260.19 Describe measures which assure that procedures are established (3E6) to assure that verified computer codes are certified for use and that their use is specified.

260.20 Describe how responsible plant personnel are made aware of (17.2.3.2) design changes / modifications which may affect the performance j

of their duties.

260.21 Part 8 of the second paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.4 indicates (4A1) that qualified personnel knowledgeable in the QA requirements will review procurement documents. Clarify that these personnel are organizationally independent of personnel who initiated the procurement documents. Typically, the documents are j

originated by engineering, health physics, operating, or maintenance personnel and reviewed by QC and/or QA personnel.

i If this review is done by personnel outside the QC and/or QA organization, describe the training and qualifications of these personnel.

260.22 Describe organizational responsibilities (including the involve-(481) ment of GPC's QA organization) for:

(1) procurement planning; (2) the preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents; (3) supplier selection; (4) bid evaluations; and

( vl (5) review and concurrence of supplier QA programs prior to initiation of activities affected by the program.

260.23 FSAR Section 17.2.5 states that activities affecting quality (SA) shall be prescrib' d by and accomplished in accordance with e

documented instructions, procedures, or drawings. Describe GPC organizational responsibilities for assuring that this is true.

260.24 The last sentence of the first paragraph of FSAR Section (58) 17.2.5.1 begins with "As applicable." Define or delete this expression.

It also states that the documents listed will be reviewed and concurred with by a person knowledgeable in

" quality requirements." Typically, this person should be from i

GPC's QA and/or QC organization. The last sentence of the first paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.5.2 also uses the expression

i

" quality requirements" in lieu of " quality assurance require-

~~

ments." Clarify.

260.25 The first paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.6 lists documents to be (6A1) controlled per GPC's QA program.

It appears that the following documents should be included in the list. Clarify, a.

Design documents (e.g., calculations, specifications, and analyses) including documents related to computer

[m0; codes.

v' l

y

6-b.

Instructions and procedures for such activities as fabrication and installation, c.

As-built documents.

d.

QA and QC manuals.

Ti e.

Topical reports.

(

f.

Nonconformance reports.

260.26 Describe measures which' assure that someone from GPC's QA (6A2) organization, or an individual uther than the person who generated the controlled document but qualified in QA, reviews and concurs with the document with regard to QA-related aspects.

260.27 Item D on FSAR page 17.2.6-2 states that master status lists (682) identify document revisions.

Identify the documents so listed, the periodicity of updating, and the personnel (by organization titles) who receive the lists.

260.28 Describe r.easures which assure that maintenance, modification, r-(17.2.6.2) and inspection procedures are reviewed by qualified personnel

( s,,

knowledgeable in QA disciplines (normally the QA organization) to determine:

a.

The need for inspection, identification of inspection personnel, and documentation of inspection results.

b.

That the necessary inspection requirements, methods, and acceptance criteria have been identified.

260.29 Describe GPC organizational. responsibilities, including inter-(7A1) faces, for the control of purchased material, equipment, and j

services.

'i 1

260.30 Clarify that procurement of spare and replacement parts is

-l (7A4) subject to QA program controls in place when the procurement 7

is made and to technical requirements equal to or better than j

the original technical requirements, or as required to preclude i

the repetition of defects.

260.31 Item D on FSAR page 17.2.7-2 refers to " Items accepted or (782) released...." Change "or" to "and" or justify not doing so.

260.32 Describe measures which assure that the supplier furnishes the (783) following records to the purchaser:

m

~ [VM a.

Documentation that identifies the purchased item and the specific procurement requirements (e.g., codes, standards, j

and 7ecifications) met by the item.

p 3

b

.\\ k e

]

._--_n i --

~

/'N i 5

b.

Documentation identifying any procurement requirements that have not been met.

ij c.

A description of those nonconformances from the procurement 7j requirements dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair."

=1

}

Describe how GPC reviews and accepts these documents.

i 260.33 Part A of FSAR Section 17.2.8 states that procedures provide for

]

(882)

" verification that items received at VEGP are properly identified d

and can be traced to the appropriate documentation...." Then an exception is taken for off-the-shelf items. Clarify that the y

fj exception does not negate the quotation above.

n j

260.34 Describe measures which assure the verification and documentation (883) of correct item identification prior to release for fabrication,

)

assembly, shipment, and installation.

260.35 Provide as complete a listing of special processes as possible (9A1) rather than repeating the 4 examples given in NUREG-0800.

260.36 Since it appears that QA's only involvement with special process

/"-

(9A2 & 981) control is audits, describe the QC organization's responsibili-

]

Q1 ties in this area.

'I 260.37 The second paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.9 addresses personnel, r

(981) equipment, and procedures in the first sentence. The second 4

sentence addresses qualification of personnel and procedures j

only and does not address qualification of equipment. Clarify.

b 260.38 Describe measures which assure that procedures are established (982) for recording evidence of acceptable accomplishment of special processes using qualified procedures, equipment, and personnel.

A l

260.39 Describe measures which assure that procedures provide criteria 3

(10A) for determining the accuracy requirements of inspection equipment 3

and criteria for determining when inspections are required or define how and when inspections are performed. Also clarify that GPC's quality control specialists and quality control inspectors are within the Quality Control Supervisor's organization.

260.40 The fifth paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.10 states that the QC (1081) supervisor is responsible for administering and implementing.

tests and inspections " assigned" to the QC department.

Identify

^

any organization (s) other than the QC department with responsi-bility for inspection. Describe measures taken to assure that

, p ~.

the inspection procedures, personnel qualification criteria,

'D and independence from undue pressure such as cost and schedule are reviewed and found acceptable by the QA organization prior i

to initiation of any inspection activity.

c y

li,,'

-(-

- __ - ~ __ -

/

4 1

4 p (

260.41 The last sentence in the sixth paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.10 (1081) states: " Procedures containing inspection criteria shall be reviewed by qualified personnel to ensure that adequate inspection hold points are included and inspection methods are adequate."

Clarify that the reviewing personnel are from GPC's QA or QC i

organization. Also discuss the review of procedures which do not contain inspection criteria b'/t which, perhaps, should.

i

'j 260.42 Inclusion of the words " nondestructive examination" in the j.]

(1082) last sentence in the fifth paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.10 L}

unacceptably limits the connitment. Delete these words or describe in similar detail the qualifications and certification j

of inspectors for inspections other than nondestructive examination.

260.43.

Describe measures which assure that procedures provide criteria (10C1 & 11A1) for determining the. accuracy requirements of inspection and

~

i test equipment and criteria for determining when a test is required or how and when testing activities are performed.

260.44 Describe measures which assure that test prerequisites are met.

(11 Big)

(>i 260.45 Since it appears that QA's only involvement with the control (12.2) of measuring and test equipment (M&TE) is audits, describe the i

QC organization's responsibilities in this area.

1 260.46 Identify the organization (s) responsible for the preparation, (12.3) review, and documented concurrence of calibration procedures.

260.47 Item B in FSAR Section 17.2.11 states that installed process (12.5) instrumentation at VEGP will not be tagged or labeled with calibration due date. Describe how GPC will assure that such j

instrumenation is not past due for calibration.

260.48 Item F and the third paragraph of FSAR Section 17.2.12 refer to

,iJ (12.6)

"an authorized level of management." Clarify what this means.

Also clarify or delete the expression, "when applicable " at the end of the third paragraph.

I

.260.49 Describe measures which assure.that inspection and tests are (12.9) repeated on items determined to be suspect because of questionable calibration status of M&TE.

260.50 Clarify or delete the following expressions from FSAR Section (13)

~17.2.13

.cs a.

as necessary b.

as required ji c.

to the extent required by these special handling instructions p

t

{'_

w,..-

^^

~

4 9-k Also identify the GPC organization responsible for the inspections and surveillance referrred to in item A of this FSAR section, t

260.51 Clarify that inspection stamps and weld stamps are controlled l

(14.2) as per the procedures noted in item A on FSAR page 17.2.14-1.

1

-1 260.52 Describe procedures to control altering the sequence of safety-(14.3) related tests, inspections, and other operations such that the alterations are subject to the same controls as the original.

.1

~I 260.53 Describe QA, QC, and other organizational responsibilities for (14.4 & 15.2) the definition and implementation of activities related to nonconformance control.

Identify the organization (s) responsible for identifying and documenting nonconfoming, inoperative, dnd malfunctioning) items to prevent inadvertent use.Identify the organization (s with authority and responsibility for the disposition of nonconforming items and for the review of the disposition and closecut.

260.54 Clarify that the nonconformance controls of FSAR Section 17.2.15 (15.1) are applicable to computer codes.

260.55 Des'cribe measures which assure that nonconformances are corrected (15.'3 )

. or resolved prior to the initiation of the preoperational test program on the item.

t 260.56 Identify the GPC organization responsible to independently review (15.5) and analyze nonconformance reports and report quality trend information as stated in FSAR Section 17.2.15 (page 17.2.15-2).

260.57 Clarify whether GPC's QA or QC organization reviews and documents (16) concurrence with corrective action procedures, is involved in the documented concurrence of the adequacy of the corrective action, verifies proper implementation of corrective action, and closes out the corrective action in a timely manner.

260.58 Describe measures which assure that inspection and test records (17.3) include (in addition to the items listed in FSAR Sections 17.2.10 and 17.2.11):

a.

Information related to conditions adverse to quality (inspection records only).

b.

Action taken to resolve any discrepancies noted.

260.59 Clarify if the GPC QC organization at the VEGP is responsible r

(17.2.18.2) for any auditing and/or surveillance.

If so, describe measures which assure that:

J t

. > + -

-e.

fw..-m-ee f.W.+

w :

e_.

i e

4 10 -

k a.

QA reviews and concurs in the schedule and scope of these activities by QC.

b.

Results of these activities by QC are provided to QA for review and assessment.

260.60 Either delete or clarify what is meant by the word (18)

" selectively" when used in franc of the word " audit" in the i

last paragraph of SAR Sections 17.2.8, 17.2.11, and 17.2.13.

,j Also, since the last paragraph of SAR Sections 17.2.4 through i

17.2.17 refers to GPC's audit program, include a similar 1

reference as the last paragraph of SAR Sections 17.2.2 and 17.2.3 or justify not doing so. Describe measures used to i

audit conformance to SAR connitments.

260.61 Section 17.1.2.2 of the standard format (Regulatory Guide 1.70) requires the identification of safety-related structures, systems, and components controlled by the QA program.

You are requested to supplement and clarify the Vogtle FSAR in accordance with the following (additional clarification may be required when the Mechanical Engineering and Power Systems Branches complete their FSAR review):

a.

The following items do not appear on FSAR Table 3.2.2-1.

Add the appropriate items to the table or justify not doing so.

1.

Fuel assemblies 2.

Underground Category 1 piping and conduits 3.

Site drainage system alterations 4.

Roof scuppers (Category I structures) 5.

Dikes around the refueling, reactor make-up, and condensate tanks.

e 6.

Fuel building radiation monitors 7.

Accident-related meteorological data collection equipment 8.

Radiation protection systems (including necessary equipment and supplies) a)

Radioactive contamination measurement and analysis b)

Personnel monitoring (internal, e.g., whole body k _,o/

counter and external, e.g., TLD system).

s I +===ees-

.er*.e_

emp,essee, m we e een -en a +--.--ww----

-.m-----,-

=

+e

= <

==

L~

a...

~

\\

i 11 -

s c)

Instrument storage, calibration, and maintenance j

program d)

Decontamination facilities, personnel, and equipment e)

Respiratory protection equipment (including testing) f)

Contamination control 9.

Safety-related masonry walls -(see IE Bulletin No. 80-11)

10. Expendable and consumable items necessary for the functional performance of safety-related structures, systems, and components (i.e., weld rod, fuel oil, boric acid, snubber oil, etc.)

11. PORVs, block valves, and their actuators

12. Control rods f

b.

Clarify FSAR Table 3.2.2-1 as noted below or justify not 4

(

doing so.

1.

Sheet 90, item 33 shows the NSCW tower valve house as not being Q-listed. Clarify that this structure shall be subject to the pertinent provision of the Vogtle operational QA program or justify not doing so.

2.

As part of the Control Room HVAC System (Sheet 59),

clarify that the hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, and radiation monitors for the air intakes are subject 4

to the pertinent provisions of the Vogtle operational QA program or justify not doing so.

.3.

Provide a commitment that the safety-related 8

instrumentation and controls (I&C) described in Sections 7.1 through 7.6 of the FSAR plus safety-related I&C for safety-related fluid systems will

~

be subject to the pertinent requirements of the

. FSAR QA program. This can be done by footnote to Table 3.2.2-1.

c. of NUREG-0737, ' Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements' (November 1980) identified numerous

. items that are safety-related and appropriate for OL c

'(

application and therefore should be on Table 3.2.2-1.

L-These items are listed below. Add the appropriate items to Table 3.2.2-1 and provide a commitment that the remaining items are subject to the pertinent requirements of the FSAR operational QA program or justify not doing so.

a.-

i

---AD 22-w

=r-

= - - - -

o-l

, -'x 12 -

NUREG-0737 Clarification Item 1.

Reactor coolant system vents II.B.1 2.

Plant shielding II.B.2 3.

Yalve position indication II.D.3 e

4.

Auxiliary feedwater system II.E.1.2 initiation and flow 5.

Emergency power for.

II.E.1.2 pressurizer heaters 6.

Dedicated hydrogen penetrations II.E.4.1 7.

Containment isolation II.E.4.2 dependability

(

8.

Accident monitoring II.F.1

(

instrumentation a

Containment Water Level Monitor b

Containment Pressure Monitor 9.

Instrumentation for detection II.F.2 of inadequate core cooling

10. Power supplies for pressurizer II.G.1 relief valves, block valves, and level indicators

11. Automatic PORY isolation II.K.3(1)

12. Automatic trip of reactor II.K.3(5) 8 coolant pumps

13. PID controller II.K.3(9) 14 Anticipatory reactor trip II.K.3(12) on turbine trip

15. Power on pump seals II.K.3(25) equipment) plans (and related

, (;

16.

Emergency III.A.1.1/III.A.2

~

(

v

.4 s

w

> 2'. L.=.3 n s sa.

- I

\\

NUREG-0737 Clarification Item

17. Equipment and other items III.A.1.2 associated with'the emergency support facilities 18.

Inplant I radiation monitoring III.D.3.3 g

2

19. Control room habitability III.D.3.4 O

1 I

t 0

4 I

v

)

~w&

y v

69 a e. +e e

e f r=., l

[s

?

v(.;_ r w.

y

~-

e

=

,b#

gem.s a

Q

,o 1

()

-f %

O

\\ \\, f 3

mys A r w;{\\ (t

_:.n<.c/ +, Ut.uw\\.L c(

7 % '%~ - 1

.f.

Lp

'(:5 tJa Q US L w O ',d.

i Jep-t0)vw MSt 2<<r -

'EV

-O c4 h Mc t1 %

sve.

1 LL uk y

W >u;tu e

O 1

ne LO.

b

,0 A* M

,s A

f l '._'.'.

9 t

e

- u

=

b(D. I, l'.dm.,- %. 7 'r ' L I L 4 iw L 'A-h9

' 'I (If V I

. :, -+Ei 6

.i S

, ~.

4,.1,

\\,.

[.' *.L ( e 4,. ' '

.b L

' * ~

. b, ;(

'5

/

i g/m h 3,

~.

tt l W e i11, lie <

+nn i

.s

^

se&~ k ag, A b

H&

L A 1 1/u/u t

y p

to sA h

</acurr d. H <erp us.z lowa, a s

~i~

ed a{

h ee - e a -t, f if.

Sc lead /c s, c t, y

t1U thy

}.ne la e rerpm, ceaJ,,

G.-

oa, y e v, e a.

(

i

-O W/?1 I

l )

l I l*

~..

4;.;.p.. -

.u.,

. - - ~.

s 0

l

~

7

' W 'h j

Pu o fyt M V

+ g,.. s'; 3 l ~~ j s,y p <

M

-'?"~',*'*3.._

- ~ ~I,'> ; -,,k. !' ' s e

,.t :.-+ w'.)

. '.,p. +.'..,, +f,,,-. M-;.

4..

T J.:e. V.?!.*..

E g

p 3

^..{;.}a:q'y 3..:

4 g

e 9

)

1

)b 3

t F

t 3

2 s

l

{

W*

w S cL4L w -

9 a

1).

wn b

~ '

M L M /,'" (' b [" g. y #

mm Y "~gys ' 3

.)b z

My D *- &

,ta te J %?

_gg

.- q :) n;[.

g

~

L:. ~ L ;i Ju Fq

.g l

d W G L /M ~" 1 i

v 1 w~

J j

,7 W n 4.w,

[

8D' T--

' :.z,.

. ~

'a.

G~>

~. ',.e d

' :.Tl '54 s s~.'

.f{f * ' >,

+r

. :,; _ <;.:. cm.w.a,; :.g-t*,,

G f;4'c.

r.

.y

,, A~.. py;.f ;,,s

,.x

..;.._-+,e.w

~'3.... # ( g..

'.s;.

a..j 4 s."

4~, -,,,, g -[ -..* Ajg 3, t+e J Ej

(( - [* ~ *

![,1_f[.

~ $

d Id3

?

i

ML20136F907

Text

SUBJECT:

Enclosure:

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

Response

SUBJECT:

Enclosure:

Navigation menu

Search