ML20129F724
| ML20129F724 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1991 |
| From: | Domby A TROUTMANSANDERS (FORMERLY TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMA |
| To: | Robinson L NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20129F106 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-94-208 NUDOCS 9610070025 | |
| Download: ML20129F724 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMAN & ASHMORE a panthemsman enctuosmo Paortssion 46 coneonaveo=s ATTORNEYS AT LAW j
CANDLER sulLDINO. SUITE #400 l
127 PEACMtagE SimEgt, N.g.
ARTHUR H. DOM BY ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303-asso waite= s osaret osat muuaca 404/068-8000 404-6S8 8743 cae68: neasstmo T E LE cope r m: mod rat-odes i
February 26, 1991 i
Mr. Larry L. Robinson l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Investigations Region II~ Field Office 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Suite 2900 i
Atlanta Georgia 30323 c
Re:
Office of Investigations Ongoing Reviews j
at the Voatle Electric Generatina Plant
{
Dear'Mr. Robinson:
i The purpose of this letter is to document our teleiphone l
conversation Friday, February 15th and, in addition, make a I
further request on behalf of my clients.
As we discussed, j
i Georgia Power Company, as licensee of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, desires to cooperate with the NRC Office of l
Investigations (OI) in its review of potential or alleged violations, including its review of the pre-planned October, 1988
]
injection of hydrogen peroxide into the reactor coolant system of Unit 1 as part of the first refueling outage.
Should you wish to
)
contact or interview any Georgia Power manager or supervisory i
j employee who has or may have authority to represent the Company's l
{
position on any relevant matter, please notify me to coordinate i
j your efforts.
As selected counsel to Georgia Power for these matters, I will then inform those employees of the general nature of OI's responsibilities and efforts and the various rights and
{
obligations of. individuals involved in your reviews.
Based on our historic interaction, I am confident that this l
co-o-dination can be achieved in an expeditious manner and without adverse impact on your efforts.
In fact, this co-l operation should facilitate your reviews -- oftentimes l
individuals are naturally reluctant to participate in activities j
which are foeeign to their experience.
J 7
With re.:rpect to the clients represented by this firm in your l'i review of the hyc'ro sen peroxide injection and in the August, s
1990, Operational: S'afety Inspection, please inform me if you wish i
N l
l t
9610070025 960827 I
I l
/)
I 1
, CS M
- b'
t TcouTMAN, SANDE;!S, LOCMECMAN & AShvoitE j
.o Mr. Larry L. Robinson February 26, 1991 i
Page 2 i
to contact any of them (other than the one employee who retained separate counsel) prior to doing so.
I should note, also, that at least one other employee interviewed by you in the hydrogen 4
peroxide injection matter had a non-attorney as his personal representative.
Please feel free to call me if you have any question as to the position of my clients in these matters.
t Very truly yours, t
j Arthur H. Domby AHD:njf I
cc:
Mr. R.
Patrick Mcdonald e
h I
i l
i e
i i
1 3
h
-