ML20129F724

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Documents 910215 Telcon Re OI Ongoing Reviews at Plant
ML20129F724
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1991
From: Domby A
TROUTMANSANDERS (FORMERLY TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMA
To: Robinson L
NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20129F106 List:
References
FOIA-94-208 NUDOCS 9610070025
Download: ML20129F724 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ _ - .

.- TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMAN & ASHMORE a panthemsman enctuosmo Paortssion 46 coneonaveo=s ATTORNEYS AT LAW j CANDLER sulLDINO. SUITE #400 l 127 PEACMtagE SimEgt, N.g.

ARTHUR H. DOM BY ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303-asso waite= s osaret osat muuaca 404/068-8000 404-6S8 8743 ,

cae68: neasstmo T E LE cope r m: mod rat-odes i

February 26, 1991 i

Mr. Larry L. Robinson l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

Office of Investigations  ;

Region II~ Field Office  :

101 Marietta Street, N.W.  !

Suite 2900 i Atlanta c Georgia 30323  !

Re: Office of Investigations Ongoing Reviews j at the Voatle Electric Generatina Plant {

l

Dear'Mr. Robinson:

i The purpose of this letter is to document our teleiphone l conversation Friday, February 15th and, in addition, make a  ;

I further request on behalf of my clients. As we discussed, i

j Georgia Power Company, as licensee of the Vogtle Electric  ;

Generating Plant, desires to cooperate with the NRC Office of l

. Investigations (OI) in its review of potential or alleged  :

violations, including its review of the pre-planned October, 1988 injection of hydrogen peroxide into the reactor coolant system of ],

Unit 1 as part of the first refueling outage. Should you wish to )

contact or interview any Georgia Power manager or supervisory i j employee who has or may have authority to represent the Company's l

{ position on any relevant matter, please notify me to coordinate i j your efforts. As selected counsel to Georgia Power for these

matters, I will then inform those employees of the general nature of OI's responsibilities and efforts and the various rights and

{ obligations of. individuals involved in your reviews. ,

Based on our historic interaction, I am confident that this '

l co-o-dination can be achieved in an expeditious manner and  !

without adverse impact on your efforts. In fact, this co- l operation should facilitate your reviews -- oftentimes l

, individuals are naturally reluctant to participate in activities j which are foeeign to their experience. J With re.:rpect to the clients represented by this firm in your l'i 7 l review of the hyc'ro sen peroxide injection and in the August, s

1990, Operational: S'afety Inspection, please inform me if you wish i N l l

t

' 9610070025 960827 I , I l
PDR FOIA- '

a /) I 1 COLAPIN94-208 PDR , , CS M

  • b'

l t

TcouTMAN, SANDE;!S, LOCMECMAN & AShvoitE j

.o  :

1 Mr. Larry L. Robinson  ;

February 26, 1991 i Page 2 i

to contact any of them (other than the one employee who retained separate counsel) prior to doing so. I should note, also, that 4 at least one other employee interviewed by you in the hydrogen peroxide injection matter had a non-attorney as his personal representative.  ;

Please feel free to call me if you have any question as to the position of my clients in these matters. t Very truly yours, _

t j

Arthur H. Domby AHD:njf I

! cc: Mr. R. Patrick Mcdonald e

h

, I i

l i

e i

i 1

3 h

-- -