ML20126J981

Requests That Similar Ltr to Encl Draft Be Sent to Applicant Re Issue 7 of Emergency Preparedness Plan.Several Items Require Resolution Before Emergency Plan Acceptable

ML20126J981
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley, 05000000
Issue date:	05/11/1984
From:	Matthews D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20126J910	List: ML20126J908 ML20126J981 ML20127B938 ML20127B965 ML20127C169 ML20127C196 ML20127C243 ML20127C248 ML20127C259 ML20127C298
References
FOIA-84-926 NUDOCS 8506190130
Download: ML20126J981 (3)

Text

.

>R RE0g

![p(l'o, UNITED STATES

', NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k.'.O'#/ ... MAY t t 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: George Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch #3 Division of Licensing, NRR FROM: David B. Matthews, Acting Chief .

Emergency Preparedness Branch Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement GUBJECT: REVIEW 0F EMERGENCY PLAN FOR BEAVER VALLEY We have reviewed Issue 7 of the Emergency Preparedness Plan for Beaver Valley Power Station and find that several items require resolution before we can conclude that the Beaver Valley Power Station Emergency Plan will provide an adequate planning basis for an acceptable state of onsite emergency preparedness.

We request that a letter similar to the enclosed draft with the attached review be sent to the applicant. Please provide this Branch with a copy of the final correspondance. The Emergency Preparedness Branch contact is Gerald E. Simonds (X-24870).

$t/ I "

avid B. Matthews, Acting Chief Emergency Preparedness Branch.

I Division of Emergency Preparedness ,

and Engineering Response  :

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

1. Draft Letter to Licensee- *f"','c

2. NRC Staff Review - J 3 r ,(_e w.i Aae- g ,,/ ft ,,j

.cc: 'E. L. Jordan, IE '

S. A. Schwartz, IE J. N. Grace, IE  ;

C.-R. Van Niel, IE i F. Kantor, IE

' G..E. Simonds. IE

, L. M. Lazo, NRR i y

CONTACT: Gerald E. Simonds IE i 492-4870 8506190130 050306 PDR FOIA CRABER84-926 PDR

lt*

=

DRAFT Docket No. 50-412 i

Gentlemen:

_W e have completed our review of of Issue 7 of the Emergency Plan for the Beaver Valley Power Station. Your plan was reviewed against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47, Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and the guidance criteria set forth in " Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency PlansandPreparednessinSupportofNuclearPowerPlants,"NbRE'G-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Revision 1, November 1980. The guidance document addresses the standards set forth in these revised emergency planning regulations of 10 CFR 50.47 and has been endorsed as Regulatory Guide 1.101, Revision 2

" Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Nuclear Power Reactors."

Dur review has indicated that additional information and commitment are required before we can conclude that your onsite emergency preparedness program is acceptable. Enclosed is our review which includes our comments for which resolution is necessary. Your plan should be revised to address these comments. Please submit the revised plan within 45 days of receipt of this letter.

.r , _ . __ . _ _ . _ , , _ _ . . . _ . - _ . _ _ . . _ . , , _ . - - . . ,_ - , , . _ , , _ , . _ _ _ . .-- _ _ -

Docket No. 50-412 As stated in paragraph 50.47(a)(2), the NRC will base its findings on a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) findings and determinations as to whether the State and local plans are adequate and whether there is reasonable assurance that they can be implemented, and on the NRC assessment as to whether the applicant's onsite emergency plans are adequate with resonable assurance that they can be implemented. In addition, an emergency response exercise with State and local governments designed to test the integrated capability of the emergency preparedness plans must be conducted before operation above 5% of rated power.

, Sincerely,

Enclosure:

13.3 Emergency Preparedness Evaluation W

w