ML20127C243
| ML20127C243 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1984 |
| From: | Sheron B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126J910 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-926 NUDOCS 8411120125 | |
| Download: ML20127C243 (2) | |
Text
I
- s
(
NOV 011984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
George Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch #3 Division of Licensing FROM:
Brian W. Sheron, Chief Reactor Systems Branch Division of Systems Integration
SUBJECT:
BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE REVI.EW.
Plant Name:
Beaver Valley Unit 2 Docket No.:
50-412 Licensing Stage:
OL Responsible Branch:
Licensing Branch #3 Project Manager:
B. Singh Review Branch:
Reactor Systems Branch
~
Review Status:
Awaiting Information The information requested in enclosure 1 is needed to close Open Item'161.
Original signed by:
Brian W. Sheron, Chief Reactor Systems Branch Division of Systems Integration
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
R. W. Houston RSB Section Leaders B. Singh CONTACT:
E. Lantz, RSB x27839
(
DISTRIBUTION Docket File RSB R/F q
RSB P/F: Beaver Valley U
ELantz R/F BSheron
/
LMarsh Elantz d
FFICIAL RECORD COPY f
DSfdSB DSI:RSB 05. R Elgrtiz: gd LMarsh BShe on 11/f/84 11/[ /84 11/
/84
F
(,
(
ENCLOSURE 1 BEAVER VALLEY-2 OPERATING LICENSE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 440.21 In its' August 10, 1984, response to SER Open Item $161, regarding
~' '
the reliability of a residual heat removal system that meets GDC-34, the Duquesne Light Company stated:
"In the event the system is unavailable, the safety grade
~
systems discussed in FSAR Section 5.4.7.4.6 are qualified to perform the function of removing residual heat from the reactor core for normal, abnormal, and design base accident conditions."
However, there is no Section 5.4.7.4.6 in the FSAR.
This response also states:
" Class IE safety-related equipment associated with the ECCS, AFWS, and S/G PORV's are identified in Table 3.11-1."
However, Table 3.11-1 has been removed from the FSAR (Amendment 8).
Thus this response is not acceptable.
To be acceptable, clear descriptions of the shutdown and long term coolihg methods that conform to GDC-34 are needed in the FSAR and also confirmation that all of the components used in these methods are environmentally qualified.
.