ML20126B123
Text
- - - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _
go..
9,,
UNITED STATES
[
HUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REQloN 1
- * * * *,e#
4H AllJ.NDALE ROAD KINO oF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 18406 Docket No. 50-336 File No. RI-90-A-118 h
Dear subject:
Allegation concerning Hillstone Unit 2 The NRC Region I office has complet9d its followup
't response to the concerns you brought to our attention on July 25 and August 22, 1990, alleging that (1) on July 25, 1990 a jumper-bypass tag on containment radiation monitor RM-8262 should have been cleared and (2) on August 22, 1990 the steam generator level channels A and D were concurrently out-of-cervice, which is a condition prohibited by technical specifications, and proper actions were not being taken.
We found your allegations to be unsubstantiated, however we did determine there to be problems with the jumper bypass tagout.
Our review of these issues has been documented in Inspection Reports 90-14 and 90-18.
We appreciate you informing us of your concerns and feel that our actions in these matters has been responsive to those concerns.
Should you have any additional questions, or if I can be of any assistance in these matters, please call ne collect at (215) 337-5120.
Sincerely, Y
aus.
Donald Haverkamp, hief Reactor Projects Section 4A cc:w/ enclosure Information in this record was dekted W. Raymond
- n accordance with fre m of Information Allegation File (2)
Act, exep; ion F0IA
" - b )
U.,. -
APPEN0!I 4.0 SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECI510NS
$1TE:
O O~1 PANEL ATTENDEES:
d om ALLEGAi!0N WO.:
N b O'O ~ \\ \\ b Chairman -
DATE:
12ho/m (ggg,1(f)34$)
granch Chter. E b u e q t
n h)
Section Chief ( AOC) - E ad-PRIORITY:
High Medium Others -
ha 1.s " 0/t
$AFETY $1GNIFICANCE: Yes h Unknown CONCURRENCE TO CLOSE0VT: 00($)$C CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes No/
(See Allegation Receipt Report)
!$ THE!R A 00L FINDING:
Yes No
!$ CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:
Yes No KAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes No KAS LICENSEE RESPONDE0, TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:
Yes No ACTION:
1)
L t %vt C>
C t.oce]
P}let a)$c9 fA of % Dtr i CV3
~
Wsw c) lssee + ui lis dhd wac our 2) t i\\^ $tb
- bhhch o o Is. aJ ona D &t t e eh vis e
?^n e c oro N "
3)
I e <\\ e r%<ks-k s Cntsl,
\\de&>-NwnsYo}lG&< ht t/n o
V m!sud "
~ f I Sd dkob bar/>fM r 4) t it
$)
NOTES:
f A4-1 h0
APPENDIX 4.0 SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS
$1TE:
/M,//>/n,, L PANEL ATTENDEES:
br_4nc ALLEGATION N 9 O- /d T' C// 8 Chairman - l_inv.1I L OATE:
T/7I/L (Mtg@2345)
Branch Chief k vkoe d h t.
n hj Section Chief (AOC) -
A4 ht PRIORITY:
High Medium Others -
on -DMb No h)
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes BC db CONCURRENCE TO CLOSE0VT: 00 (SeeAllegationReceiptReport)@/
CONF 10ENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes l$ THEIR A 00L FIN 0!NG:
Yes
,)
h
!$ CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:
Yes HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes (ffo l HAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:
Yes
[/
ACTION:
- 1) a.nxI
~J'
,a j
.,anL-cek e cImd400
(
+
k ct[be,cA.
2)
Twc #2 Cjuc 3) 4)
5)
NOTES:
{
A4-1 l
DO
e R i - A olis Page of Detailed Description of Allegation:
15See. M S hew dv vrt6 insce<4v (%+4} m W 7/2S MJ tuer w ksnots e, cd /7 7 5 / cm /dch[m #/nt,b u
ni s>
s Ob7 AIR v)0 s l Mas lv! 3 kev lO be Ol@r<c0 (T c, himm.ou)
~
/ /'
/
//
MO 's b s et nel Etew k Dkoa4 Mc.wasep tul.
I
- gg 9
i WT esmee) l tssrc /fL' flo LWm e<m alleyb bb fl2Iv90
,n i
J
/
Ale /e.
T km n % unns bi-s L Y s usu.
d e., da n 3J,,a n
a a
a g
_Bre b,c.k di+ Oh.J h S/c-kues wa s 'me 6e4ath. hal;%
i i
I tf_V e cd.< d
- L o nnt1 b saJu S c'56c4 k keur( ho l th $te(
)
L% S d to ke bb (4 w [.I n o Rh en A d t'% Mt is t r f th.
d S %* S
. h CA r um, dm.x cr 'W emL de $2 "'reo-+ E~ 6k m eMO t
c u t L,a i A La A-a s " is w e. '
- I.".
&5SL+ vheAo NRC Region I Form 207 (Revised 10/89)
,- r. :-
.?
^
k\\*'Z' -
. W * <.. :. ' ~
' ~. v.
c r;.
i' D..u. :,{y~... <ik,Y) h i h.: w.w...M 4W.. ~ g r e S ;.
,1.f;. i^ c ": w i,. Q..~. '.- %.&
~ >;. 'r
M' u a f'.') P.-j '
ir[..
.9di
....... uw e, e...w.
...s.,.
- u....
- m. ~ r c.........w...
('
,4LLEGATl0N PECEIPT Wed, Aug 22,1990 ALLEGATION NO.: Rl-A-90-Sb t
9 07 AH
/
CilJ St:
hn:
Confidentiality:
Was it requested?
Yes No.X.
Wasit initially granted?
Yes No Was it finally granted by tre allegetton panel?
Yes No Does a confidentiality 6greement reed to be sent to the alleger?
Yes No Has a confidentiality agreement teen sigred?
Yes No Me mo documentirn why it vas granted is attac hed?
Yes No Employer:
NNECO Position /Titlet Facility: MILLSTONE 2 DOCKET NO.: 50-336 5UMMARY: The 'A' channel of the RPS is out of service today to change out a power supply, which inoDs its inDuts including low steam generator (SG) level. Two weet ago, the SG 1evel channel for the ~D' RPS channel ano found that the transmitter was reading low out of
?pecification Adjustment was later made by other l&C personnel to the channel out ut meter which put the channel in specification. but created two errors 311eges that both SG 1evel inps for the "A" and "D" PPS channels are inoperable, a condition not allowed by the Tech Specs. Mr.
stated that this condition is known by l&C and Operation personnel but nothing is being done about it.
NUMBER OF CONCERNS:
2 1 technical 1 wrong doing EMPLOYEE RECEIVING ALLEGATION: Doug Dempsey Information in this record was deleted in accordance with uhe Fr m of information Act, exep;ptions ee 1
F01A. 9 Hl,Y
\\
- -. -. -.. - -. ~
.. ~ -.. -. -
ACTiYlTY.
Y REACTOR FUNCTIONAL AREA: (e) X_ Operations (f) __ Onsite H&S 1
(c)._. Safeguards (g) 0ffsite His (h) 0ther s-l Time Required to Process Request:
1 tion-Hours PECOMMELATION immediate RI followup will be performed on 8/22 to vertfy status of RPS
,0 appropnoteness of licensee actions to disposition problems. Conduct panel meeting ASAP.
a 4
9
?
L V
e w,-----s-+----
--..,--.,,'v.,-
,,,,,._,,.,-,,,,.,-e,,--r-wY,-ver-----wtw w-r r w - v "-
w
~- =~ "
rF=
-